yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Asus Transformer TF700] sbdags:
Loads of places you can buy a charger from. Or buy a plug adapter, US charger should work in Denmark.
[Asus Transformer TF700] Kosai106:
As I said in the thread, I bought an original charger from Asus, designed to work with the TF700.
[Asus Transformer TF700] sbdags:
Sorry I didn't read your thread properly......

How long are you letting it charge for, could be the battery is completely dead or malfunctioning in the dock.
[Asus Transformer TF700] Kosai106:
It's been charging for well over 48 hours at this point, and still nothing. The tablet gets charged through the dock just fine, but the dock itself stays at 0%.
[Asus Transformer TF700] Kosai106:
I'm gonna go ahead and bump this.

It's been nearly two months, and still no solution. :(
[Asus Transformer TF700] Kosai106:
-Snip-
[Asus Transformer TF700] berndblb:
I would say your dock battery is dead. There's a video on YouTube on how to tear down and replace it. No idea though how much a replacement battery would be...

You wouldn't still be under warranty, would you?
[Asus Transformer TF700] Kosai106:
I should be, the only problem is that I bought the tablet in America, and I live in Denmark, Europe, so idk. Shipping will be expensive, unless I can send it to ASUS Europe?
[Asus Transformer TF700] berndblb:
Call your Asus service center or open a ticket online. They will direct you to the nearest service center. The warranty is worldwide - so you should not have any problems.
[Asus Transformer TF700] svenjens:
Same problem here

It seems I am having exactly the same problem. My dock battery is shown as 0% charged and it is blinking orange.

Was there any solution to this problem? Could this be software related and being fixed by another firmware (by the way: does the dock have its own firmware?)? Or is this more hardware related and the dock battery is just broken and needs a replacement.

I bought my dock used and separated from the TF700. Anyway I will try to contact Asus support to see what their answer is.

Regards

Sven
[Asus Transformer TF700] rmjdees:
tf700 only charges when docked

I have the opposite problem. I got a refurbished tf700 and dock. The tablet will only charge when docked. It won't charge directly from charger.

Tablet was completely dead when it arrived. It's now charged up to 18% (dock started at 53% and is now down to 2%), but still only charges with the dock. Will charge all night to see if that changes anything.

r
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] louisaurio:
Hello, can someone with experience can port the 4.2 Quick Panel from the International Galaxy S3 leaked ROM to our AT&T Galaxy S3.

I refer to the quick panel(The panel with tiles).
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] joshuagalipeau:
not possible as of now, but 4.3 has been spotted on a d2att and is supposed to be released in September. that will bring what you are looking for :)
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] KingFnerb:
So, the kickstand on my phone is shot. The nut on the back just spins and will not tighten causing the kickstand to flop around like a baby seal. Given some rebates, etc. when I got the phone, I did get Best Buy's protection plan. So, basically, they would swap the phone out for free - only one small problem. This phone isn't available in their warehouse. This leaves me with one of two options really:

1. Put up with the kickstand (I've resorted to putting a piece of tape over it and then just putting my phone in a case) until they get some in-stock at which point they would swap it out.

2. Take it in, and since they don't have any in stock, they would transfer me over to a Galaxy S3.

I don't know much about the S3 and how comparable it is to this phone. I guess I'm just curious if anyone else has any kickstand fixes or if they would swap their phone out for an S3 if they could...
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] numel007:
If I were you, I'd just get the S3

Sent from a ReVolted EVO
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] KingFnerb:
Any particular reason why?
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] youdug:
i have both.

the screen is terrible imo. put them side by side and the s3 looks blue.

there is some really good development happening on another forum for it though.

not sure about the development on here. dont really check.

how far from an upgrade are you?

if youre not far from upgrading and you plan on upgrading get the s3. it is worth a lot more on the skreet than the lte and you should have no problem selling it for $175 to 200.
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] KingFnerb:
Yeah, I'm not a fan of the screen either (a couple guys in the office have then) but I'm not due for an upgrade until July next year.
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] polar2792:
I'd go with the S3. Bigger battery I'm pretty sure and its got more active devving going on. Only real downside is the screen. You can get a case with a kickstand.
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] KingFnerb:
Eh, I'm not worried about the kickstand. However, it does seem the general consensus is that the S3 has be more flourishing dev community.

I have to admit, I kinda like sense - that will be the only bummer. I don't like how long it takes to get updates though.
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] numel007:
I really dislike HTC to be honest, this was my first and probably last. The development we get from devs is just incredible like Jamie and untz to name two. But generally development for Samsung is prolonged far after the device is considered obsolete. Hell my brother's Epic still has development.

Sent from a ReVolted EVO

---------- Post added at 02:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:24 PM ----------

Sense looks good, so does Touchwiz if you ask me. Took HTC way too long to get notification bar toggles in Sense

Sent from a ReVolted EVO
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] waterbound:
Just replace the kickstand
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] AarSyl:
Keep in kind that HTC had notification toggles in phones from other carriers.

______________________________

HTC Evo 4G LTE
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] Demetris:
Well after i try to migrate to cm10.2 and tablet didn’t boot after every second reboot i went back to cm10.1 roms.

I went to 10.2 to try to fix the Bexus kernel but alas i have a wife that don’t like messing with her staff [who does? :) ]

So to keep my self out of troubles for time being i had a try to port our youngster brothers kernel am talking about Ovation/Hummingbird or else Nook HD/+.

I tested it first on Cm10.2 but due to the fact that it was buggy i didnt know if it was my kernel faulty or the rom, i flashed 09/10/11 same issue.

So now i went completely back to cm10.1 base turned out it wasnt me at all :(

By the way i have notify Hashcode about the problems we are facing and all will be fixed by due time.

Kernel name is taken from Greek/Cyprus language so a plain translation would mean to you Pellamos=more that awesome more or less.

Kernel is freshly baked from the oven and needs testing so await your feedback.

Download Links

Initial http://tinyw.in/4JMs

1a http://tinyw.in/E8Jl

1b http://tinyw.in/IrzN

1c http://tinyw.in/Vnit

1d http://tinyw.in/Vpvi

1e http://tinyw.in/Mnxa

Source

https://github.com/Ntemis/Pellamos

Enjoy
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] Demetris:
Taking this one too just in case :)
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] topdawg7793:
You do too much! I'll test as soon as possible. Thank you for your hard work and keeping my Nook Tablet relevant haha.
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] topdawg7793:
Tried it for a few hours earlier today and it is stable. Deep sleep and everything is working. Only needs 1.2ghz now ;)
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] Demetris:
Pellamos 1b released.

Pellamos 1c out.

Enjoy.
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] lrs421:
Running 1b charging is slow. Is there a change log for this kernel?
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] mollari:
No deep sleep for me on 1c, doesn't seem like an app waking, previous kernel was NOF Showtime and it slept.
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] Demetris:
[MENTION=4958324]mollari[/MENTION]

Does 1b deep sleeps for you?
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] marcusmarcus:
B did not sleep for me. Haven't tried C. I went back to NOF 3.22 kernel. That has been the best for me.
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] mollari:
Checked it, 1b doesn't sleep too.
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] Demetris:
I released a new 1c can you please test and report?

Thanks
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] mollari:
Flashed it, no deep sleep. :(
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] Demetris:
1d out. Still no deep sleep :(

Looking into it still.
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] swaaye:
Can you try building a kernel that is all the stock code used by CM 10.1 but has your 1.2 GHz overclock built in? Maybe that will still have deep sleep functioning.
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] Demetris:
I didn’t give up am just missing time and a proper charge usb cable.
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] swaaye:
1d seems to have correct CPU idling behavior even after long term usage so that is a positive point. I was having problems with mysterious CPU load preventing the CPU from reducing clock speed on one of your other kernels.
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] Demetris:
Pellamos 1e released.
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] swaaye:
Thanks for continuing to work on this. BTW why no changelog?
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] topdawg7793:
Not sure what the secret sauce is but my Nook is silky smooth again! Performance seems to be on par with your other kernels. I've only left it sitting on my table for a little over ten minutes but it looks like deep sleep is working! Thank you for your hard work!
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] Chunky Monkey:
Tested version e out. Agree it runs smooth and the thanks for the hard work. Don't think I am having the same luck with deep sleep. Chewed through a full charge over night while off...not powered down. By the way you NOF 3.22 seems to deep sleep fine for me.
[Firefox OS General] amorley:
I love Mozilla, but from what I've read it doesn't seem like there is really any point to Firefox OS.

Other than flaming me, could you please list some specifics as to why it's beneficial?

I've talked to a lot of people in person about it and they all seem to talk about potential to grow like Android. The main problem I see with this is that whereas Android filled an obvious gap in the market, Firefox OS is trying to carve a niche in now heavily fortified waters. The fact that Windows Mobile both says they'll be happy for 1% of the market, buys off Nokia and pays off devs to port apps, it should be a pretty clear sign this will be a major challenge for Mozilla when a company with a scrooge mcduck tower of cash is piling money on the issue and still getting limited results.

For the record, I'm going to install it on my of my old devices just to play around with it but in the meantime if anyone could pose a good argument for Firefox OS then I'd all ears. It'd be nice to know the time I'll spend setting it up is worth more than just curiosity and Mozilla sympathy.

Or just flame me and call me a noob :(
[Firefox OS General] tuxor1337:
in my opinion, we definitely need firefox os. if it will be of any advantage for your user experience, is heavily dependent of its success. but it's the only smartphone os, that uses a really open approach. since most apps are shortcuts for browsing to a certain web page on your smartphone, basing the whole os on a browsing engine makes a lot of sense. and it makes lots of things easier for devs.
[Firefox OS General] tux-root:
It seems promising to have a fully custoimizable and open source OS for low end phones. FOS could extend the lifetime of many phones which is a nice perspective instead of throwing away functional hardware.
[Firefox OS General] aristide1997:
FirefoxOS is:

Customisable, free

Hardware UN-requiring

This means that low end phones can use the fos because they don't need powerful hardware, and poorer people in countries like Brazil or Ghana can use modern phones for little price. It's not really meant for our newer phones high-end.
[Firefox OS General] trevh:
defender of the Open Web

Most important is that Firefox OS seems to be the most tangible defence to keep our Open Web environment from becoming closed. With Firefox OS, the millions of new users from Africa, the Middle East, Asia and Central / South America who are now just starting to buy low cost smart-phones will enjoy using, coding and Creating in Java and HTML 5, and be free to ignore 5.1 with its restrictions such as DRM.

Right now, the Web, Free and Open as we know it seems to be dying! Here's what Danny Obrien of the Electronic Frontier Foundation wrote on October 2 (link to full article after the quote):-

… where you cannot cut and paste text; where your browser can’t “Save As…” an image; where the “allowed” uses of saved files are monitored beyond the browser; where JavaScript is sealed away in opaque tombs; and maybe even where we can no longer effectively “View Source” on some sites, is a very different Web from the one we have today. It’s a Web where user agents—browsers—must navigate a nest of enforced duties every time they visit a page.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/10/lowering-your-standards
[Firefox OS General] darkforester67:
I think why people should bother with B2G/Firefox OS is because it's not as complicated as Android - Android has a bunch of stuff that most of the time people won't even bother using so that's one benefit with B2G... Apart from the fact that it's not very hardware dependent, it's also simple and fast and aims at open source which Android seems to be lacking nowadays...
[Firefox OS General] abracs:
Because no Google there..
[Firefox OS General] pathaniya:
Because we like to evolve, have choices and detest monopoly (imagineyou turning into an android ;p)
[Firefox OS General] profler1982:
Becouse is extra
[Firefox OS General] Djaxar:
No google, is the point!
[Firefox OS General] amit.rai:
I would love to see FireFox as an mobile /tablet platform, because it has given middleware which can run webapps. which i feel is far better than any other achievement unlike any other platform where middleware are heavy sometimes VM's to run app in UI. Firefox gives ability to run apps with PC like standards(HTML5, CSS3) etc.

i personally tested and best thing is there search is quite competing with google search for Android. try one .

Lot of other competeres try making webapps as there UI framework but fais may be because there inexperience, i am hoping Firefox with there vast knowledge can create a ecosystem where mobile ui/ PC ui will became synonyms. in that case nothing except a good webkit will solve all issues. till then we can wait.

~Amit
[Firefox OS General] asadotzler:
In 2002 and 2003, the world was saying the same thing about Mozilla's browser. What's the point? IE 6 was pretty amazing (seriously!) when it came out and most Web developers I talked to were happy to have one target client. That sentiment was very different after 2005 when Firefox demonstrated to the world that the Web was stagnating. Most Web developers changed their tunes and started demanding Microsoft release newer versions with modern capabilities and erase IE 6 from the face of the Earth.

Mozilla is a non-profit dedicated to pushing the boundaries of what's possible with Web technology while putting users at the center of their computing experience. We are here with no other agenda. We're not trying to sell ads. We're not trying to sell hardware. We're not trying to grow subscribers. We're trying to put users in more control and to expand the possibilities for the best operating system ever created -- the Web.

That's enough reason for me.

- Asa

(15 year Mozilla veteran)
[Firefox OS General] _AtilA_:
As a developer I love it because I don't need to code twice (at best) if I want my app to work on multiple devices, screen sizes, OSs, future OSs, etc. The WEB is the platform so my app can easily intercomunicate with other webapps regardless of their underlying technology, because the WEB has standards. This will result in better and rich apps with better and rich services WITHOUT being enslaved by any platform/SDK specifics.

FirefoxOS is the next common-sense step on mobile technology and I'm pretty sure we are going to see Boot2Webkit, Boot2Blink, from the other companies... and if we don't, we will see more companies following the same fate as Nokia, Microsoft...
[Firefox OS General] bkerensa:
Because Mozilla is helping build a internet the world needs and has been for years. Mozilla is also the most privacy focused company making software and has won awards backing that.
[Firefox OS General] amorley:
I've been trying hard to get our teams to develop for it but there doesn't seem to be much enthusiasm for it in China... :(
[Firefox OS General] KUPOinyourWINDOW:
I have the Mozilla Flame phone and currently it's stable version is Firefox OS 2.0 and honestly, the improvements they've made make FFOS more unique and beneficial for the user. It's almost up to scratch, just a one or two releases and the features will be there. The speed already is there.
[Firefox OS General] Franzferdinan51:
to be free from the grasps of a company who spys on your every move
[Firefox OS General] Saijin_Naib:
As a user since version 1.0 on a ZTE Open, I have to say that I don't see a single compelling reason for an end-user to buy a FFXOS device, other than possibly price (debatable: many Android handsets fall into nearly the same price point, and the Lumia 520 is basically the same price as the ZTE Open C and better in every possible regard).

I get that it is an incredibly important vision that Mozilla have for the future of HTML5 and apps, but that matters most on the back end for developers and those who provide apps and services. I also understand that Mozilla have made great efforts to ensure that Open WebAPI is as painless as possible for developers to use, and that using very few lines of code, you can write powerful solutions. These are all fantastic things, and the web and technology in general stand to benefit massively from this.

However, from a purely end-user point of view, I find the UI/UX to be lagging severely behind every other platform, not to mention the relatively poor functionality of the stock apps. They do nothing other platforms don't do better.

The performance is abysmal, even on the Flame, and the battery life fluctuates wildly and does not impress me at all given my usage pattern.

I've filed endless amounts of suggestions for expansion and improvements to UI/UX and 99% of the time am met with blind reticence.

The feel I get is not that this is a platform for everyone by everyone, but a platform for a very small subset of the population (which if you analyze what the platform ships with stock and how they market it, Mozilla seems to have no idea who this population is) controlled by a team with a death-grip on it, fingers in their ears, blindfolds on, chanting "This is perfect, this is perfect, you don't know what you're talking about!".

People's tepid response to the platform and its slow adoption rate should stand as testimony to the fact that the platform is far from perfect.

****, the keyboard STILL sucks complete ass even on v2.2 nightly. Something as fundamental as the primary ****ing input method still isn't even done half-assed correct, so what do you think the rest of the experience is like?

Such a frustrating platform... I really wanted this to be the Phoenix that takes the principles and ideals of webOS from the ashes and sets the world of technology on fire, but it looks more like a poof of smoke at this point.

I'll continue daily-driving the Flame, I'll continue filing bugs and suggestions, and I'll likely continue to pull my hair out in frustration. Hopefully at some point all of my frustration will amount to something positive and I'll be able to whole-heartedly endorse this platform to other end-users and evangelize for it. Currently, that is not even a remote possibility.
[Firefox OS General] Warren_Orange:
Because we should be more principled and not support companies that pay no tax.
[Firefox OS General] hevangel:
I wonder how many people are actually using FFOS as their only phone.

I have a ZTE Open, I am downloading and compiling FFOS builds once every few weeks, hack around just for fun.

But I have an Android for my daily use.
[Firefox OS General] Saijin_Naib:
From how many things are still broken and how unaware the Mozilla team seem about how poor UI/UX is, I very much doubt that terribly many people are using it as their only phone.

I am, and it is frustration upon frustration daily. It has improved rapidly, however.
[Firefox OS General] cairnarvon:
Honestly I would tell anyone to stay away from a Firefox OS device. It is understandable that there'll be a few kinks, as it's still in development but the usability is terrible. I don't use it as my main phone, rather only as an mp3 player. If you still want to buy a FX OS device, I'd strongly recommend you try before you buy.
[Firefox OS General] Saijin_Naib:
The music player app is complete balls though. Ugh..
[Firefox OS General] cairnarvon:
Yes it is quite bad but it's better than nothing. ..

Forgot to mention that I think the aims and principles of FX OS are quite noble but it's a shame that Mozilla got into bed with untrustworthy charlatans, like ZTE.
[Firefox OS General] Saijin_Naib:
I completely agree. I support the vision and noble goal behind the project, but the current incarnation is infuriatingly poor, in my opinion.

Why the **** couldn't Mozilla have just teamed up with the webOS Ports/webOS Internals team to turn Open webOS/LuneOS into FFXOS? At least if they had done that, the platform would have started out with amazing UI/UX, awesome system/service integration, flawless Just Type, Text Assist, and every other webOS tool that made using it amazing. I feel like they tried to reinvent the wheel and got stuck when they made a square that sort of rolls if you push it hard enough.

Sure, it works, but it is painful.
[Firefox OS General] Saijin_Naib:
I've been busy on the FireFoxOS bugtracker :P

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglis....com&component=Gaia::Music&product=Firefox OS
[Firefox OS General] KUPOinyourWINDOW:
Regarding the GUI, has anybody here used Firefox OS 2.1 on a Mozilla Flame? I ask because that is what I am currently running and in my opinion it looks brilliant, I prefer the look to Android and iOS. (I haven't used any other mobile operating systems than the ones mentioned though). Edit: Now it's also worth mentioning that Firefox OS is currently aimed at emerging markets. The goal is to allow people who cannot afford a regular smartphone the option of a cheaper Firefox OS device so that they can still access the web from a mobile device. With that said, Firefox OS is a brilliant option and that is why I believe we should bother with Firefox OS.
[Firefox OS General] Saijin_Naib:
Yes, running v3.0 nightly on a Flame. The GUI is tolerable, but the UX and workflow of using the device is an absolute mess.

Being meant for emerging markets doesn't excuse crap UI/UX.
[Firefox OS General] KUPOinyourWINDOW:
You need to be aware of three very important things.

1) The nightly builds of Firefox OS for the Flame are "Shallow Flash" builds, which means the Gaia and Gecko layers are updated but the Gonk layer isn't. This can effect performance and overall "work flow" of a build, for obvious reasons.

2) Firefox OS 2.2 isn't even close to being finished yet. You're running software that won't be considered stable until the end of this year.

3) The quality of a user interface is a measurable thing but mainly it is a case of personal preference. It works, and in my opinion looks quite nice. If you don't like it you don't need to use it. I definitely suggest you build a full flash of a stable version of Firefox OS before you complain about it though.
[Firefox OS General] wrkerr:
After PRISM, many of us are less trusting of Google. Mozilla seems to know their role, and respect the freedom and privacy of their users, unlike Big G.
[Firefox OS General] crislevin:
Got my open c to 2.2. Love it! UI is innovative and beautiful.

I actually can use it as my only phone. It lacks navigation and netflix/hulu, but I have a tab for those.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] stakas:
Can someone help me to put Cyanogenmod on my st15i in the Key West are?

Thanks ancsi@hotmail.com