yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Sprint HTC One (M7)] BMP7777:
You can probably get wifi functionality indefinitely but if your account goes into collections, then you will likely have a bad ESN flashed to your device. There are workarounds for that as well as anything else to a point, but I don't know the ins and outs of that sort of thing. I do know that it is possible but difficult to flash to a prepaid carrier. They have to 1) be CDMA and 2) have CDMA service available where you are. You will either need to get that company to flash for you or get whats called CDMA Tool to flash to another carrier. I have the software but have never used it so I really can't give any more info than this.......
[Upgrading, Modifying and Unlocking] se7encircles:
Used app framaroot one click done rooted and verified. But still can't read root folders.i am a complete noob at this and this phone has no recovery or ROMS i would be very grateful and thankful if anyone could help me come up or devolope a recovery or ROM for this phone.i understand computers and doing research and self teaching any help for a noob would be great.
[Upgrading, Modifying and Unlocking] se7encircles:
OK root is , working great as well as busy box. Can anyone help come up or build a ROM for this phone I'm a noob.
[Upgrading, Modifying and Unlocking] jesslegentil:
Hi, I just got the same phone and would love to room. I have rooted three different android phones in the past but can find little information on this on. Could you walk us through it?:confused:
[Samsung Galaxy Mini] johnkepil:
where's the link download of jana's rom 6.7 for mini s5570? :(
[Member-Found Deals] Chirpout:
85% off any 2 items with code "labor85"

http://us4.campaign-archive1.com/?u=fd16f77903326a7818ed3126d&id=d1fc6a8e85&e=aab2df346d
[Member-Found Deals] Knight-Rider:
Just bought 7 front/back protectors for my gs4 paid $10.50 would've been almost $60. I've stopped using Zagg for almost a year now been using Xtreme ever since. Price is better and it's smoother than Zagg.
[Transformer TF300T Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] brandonharrison10:
Hello folks!

I purchased a bricked TF300t from ebay. I knew it was bricked when I bought it, but I asked the original owner a bunch of questions before buying and it seemed like I could fix it. Well he wasn't completely honest about the issues it had and now I am stuck in a bootloop. It will load the ASUS splash screen, then it will begin to load the rom by showing the metallic looking asus splash screen with the spinning circle. It will spin for a little while, freeze, then reboot.

I was able to flash the stock JB 4.2 rom via the sdcard and the stock recovery (yes it is the JB bootloader) and this is where it lands me. I was hoping to use a TWRP or ClockworkMod recovery, but when I boot to the bootloader and it says fastboot protocol is on, neither of my Windows 8x64 pc will recognize it. Not just that it can't find the right driver, but that it doesn't see anything at all has been connected. Nothing in the device manager, no sound effects, nada. I have no blobs, so APX is worthless to me (and it doesn't find anything in apx mode either). I have used universal ADB drivers, Naked drivers, Driving Ms. Daisy, all to no avail. I have also tried to connect it to a 64 bit windows 7 machine with no luck. I am using the stock USB cable as well.

Basically I need a way to get out of the bootloop, a way to make fastboot work, or to flash a new recovery via sd-card (which I don't even think is possible). Any suggestions would be appreciated.

Oh, and before you give me the standard forum-snob response, "Google is your friend. Search the forums. Your issue has been answered," I have been wrestling with this problem for over a month, and have Googled my brains out. I have dome my due diligence. If you think the answer is out there, put up or shut up. Give me a link.
[Transformer TF300T Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] graphdarnell:
If they know, they wouldn't give you the Google-is-your-friend thing. But sarcasm won't get you far either, I'm afraid. People are willing to help, but nobody owes anybody anything up here. Your due diligence is for your own good, and counts for little here. No need to remind them to put up with you. You're asking for help you're not paying for, remember?

Now to the matter at hand: is it possible that the cable and/or the I/O port is bad? That takes place quite often. A wrong push might bend the tiny pins inside (happened to me, I had to replace the ribbon cable ). Some have gone through 2 or 3 USB cables before getting the thing to work. There have been cases where the PC couldn't connect with the tab in fastboot mode because the drivers did not install correctly or it's Win 7 64, etc... But if you can verify software validity PC-side, then it can't be anything other than physical non-connectivity. You might be barking up the wrong tree by focusing solely on firmware tab-side.
[Transformer TF300T Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] brandonharrison10:
First off, thanks for your reply! Secondly, I am sorry that my original post came off sounding so harsh! It didn't sound so bad in my head (but rereading it I think you are right). Sorry if I offended. I have edited my original post to remove some of the snarkiness.

Also, it may be a bad IO port, but when I plug it into the computer while on the bootloader menu, for example, the tablet freezes for just a moment as if it is getting ready for communication with my pc.. I hope the IO port is not bad, but even if it is, any other ideas that anyone can give me would be welcome.
[Transformer TF300T Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] graphdarnell:
I read your OP again. Your problem is interesting. I assume at this point your tab is stuck at the bootloader with at least 2 icons (RCK and Wipe Data), since if you can load the 4.2 rom, you can use Goo manager to download the custom recovery. But even if stuck at fastboot page, you should be able to select RCK and flash back to 4.1 with the official zip (104220 unzipped once) on SD card. I've done this after selecting the wipe data icon (while you're on official rom with no custom recovery installed, it's safe to wipe data). Once you succeed at downgrading to 4.1, you can work your way back up to 4.2. Have you tried this?
[Transformer TF300T Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TwStD:
Emphasis is my own. Sorry to go grave digging but I'm running into issues with my tablet trying to fastboot with win 7 x64. Is this a known issue or was that just a dig at Microsoft?
[Transformer TF300T Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] graphdarnell:
There were reports of people running into problems using W7 64. I've used it, and it's not so much problems as it is it'd act weird sometimes. So I mostly used W7 32. Hope that answers your question.
[Transformer TF300T Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] pyraxiate:
I only use X64. No issues here, I just use the drivers posted on the sticky ( http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1697227 Post 2 Under "Utilities 300T 300TG" ). I didnt have any luck with the universal drivers though. One thing that DID make a difference for me was whether I plugged it into a USB port on the front ( from the motherboard header ) or directly to the motherboard in the rear. Rear worked where front didnt ( on 2 different computers ). It might have something to do with the length of the cable + connecting in multiple spots. My external USB drives / Wireless adapters work perfect on the front ports, and one computer is brand new ( Intel extreme board + 3770K ). The new rig has USB3 on the front as well.
[Transformer TF300T Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TwStD:
To be fair, I am on a ME301T but the hardware and most of the software is nearly identical. I'll try the drivers you recommended.
[Transformer TF300T Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] pyraxiate:
Also try different usb ports as well. Its weird, but fixed my issue. Also on laptops, some have daughterboards or small ribbons connecting to some of the USB ports. Its worth a shot trying different ports on a laptop as well.

Let us know if it works !

If not, it could be your dock connector as mentioned earlier. Luckily, they are cheap though.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/OEM-ASUS-TF...216?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item1e7a699730
[Transformer TF300T Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TwStD:
OK, will do. Thanks!
[Transformer TF300T Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Buster99:
try using a Linux. and install adb and fastboot drivers. win8 is a pain in the butt with android. i switched to Linux mint as a main os for everything android. also check the forum here. I posted a guide to reflash from a softbrick as long as fastboot is working.

Unrecoverable bootloader error but not Bricked!

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=44244313

Unrecoverable bootloader error but not Bricked!

gl

buster
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 Software Upgrading] aminsamizadeh:
All the time i try different ROMs on my XDA mini I get Checksum error at the end...(i replaced the 416 bytes of mine with destination ROM)

How serious is this error...?

Any tool to check the checksum before uploading to device.?

I found out some people mentioned that by soft reseting the device should work properly...

i haven't tried soft reseting after getting checksum error...

I'm abit comfused about byte replacing..some says 416..some 420..some 220...

Would you help me with thesae issues...
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 Software Upgrading] iDG:
The number of bytes that need to be replaced is actually 412.

416 bytes will work too, but you're actually overwritting the first four bytes of the replacement rom with the ones from the backup, but in all the rom I've checked these four bytes are always the same...

If you copy LESS THAN 412 bytes, the rom loader will report "Not allow update!" and no update will be performed.

The checksum error is currently unavoidable because nobody has figured how to calculate it. Only your original backup of the rom will upload without the error.
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 Software Upgrading] aminsamizadeh:
Thanks for your Technical Information...

If i change the the 416 Bytes and after updating checksum error appears...what should i do? i read in some threads that some people after getting this error have reset(soft) their devices and continued working with their new ROM...

Is it accurate action?
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 Software Upgrading] iDG:
The soft reset is required after the update, because the device will still be in "boot monitor" mode. The reset is required even with your original backup rom (which will not give you the "Checksum Error").
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 Software Upgrading] aminsamizadeh:
I mean after getting checksum error..soft reseting will make the device work properly with the ROM which has checksum error.

does it harm the Device..?
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 Software Upgrading] iDG:
Let the bootloader finish the rom update and display the "Checksum error", the remove the SD card and perform a soft reset. The checksum error is unavoidable and completely harmless.
[Galaxy Note II Themes and Apps] fausto88:
I cant connect with my samsung f6500. I have Thunder lite Rom and Adam kernel

Wysyłane z mojego GT-N7100 za pomocą Tapatalk 2
[T-Mobile HTC One (M7)] nviz22:
Can you get LTE on T-Mobile's Network with the AT&T model of the HTC One?
[T-Mobile HTC One (M7)] irrelephant:
Nope... But you can get att LTE with a tmobile phone...
[HTC First] iviagic:
Anyone got one of these?/will it work?

:)
[HTC First] killall-q:
Yes, I have a USB OTG cable and it works for low power USB drives.
[Nexus 4 General] thiagox:
Hello guys,

in several sites I see people talking about the Moto X, many classify it as a octa-core smartphone (dual-core 1.7ghz Krait processor + single-core contextual computing + single-core natural language processor + quad-core Adreno 320 GPU).

Anyway... below is a link to a document which (as I understand it) itself Qualcomm explains that Adreno 320 of our N4 is also quad-core, in other words the N4 can also be considered a octa-core smartphone (of this view point).

I am raising this topic, due to the fact that the launch of the Moto X generated a great noise, which in my humble opinion is exaggerated due to the fact that it does not innovated much. And of course it has come with a price quite salty for your hardware configuration.

Link: http://www.qualcomm.com/media/releases/2011/02/14/qualcomm-announces-next-generation-snapdragon-mobile-chipset-family

If anyone has interest in manifest, feel free! :D
[Nexus 4 General] Marcb:
The Moto X does innovate, but not within the geeks and processor whores...

It inovates in having the always "on" mic dedicated chip, the Moto Maker, the active notifications...

In many times innovation does not come in form of faster processors...
[Nexus 4 General] fortunz:
The moto x would have been a great phone at a nexus price. The screen is the densest non-pentile AMOLED screen out there that I'm aware of. But the price is how it generated all that hype, the price rumors buoyed everything else. By the time the real price surfaced, there were already a bunch of low information followers in the mass market who were fascinated by the colors and motomaker, and didn't know much else. That's where the x8 branding came in handy, making it seem to these folks like a higher end device. It's not bad, those two cpu cores are krait 300 while our 4 are krait 200. Unless you're using some form of windowed or multiscreen (doing one thing on phone while streaming another to HDTV) multitasking, it's probably a wash between the two.

All things being equal, I'd rather have the moto x. At more than double the price (16gb n4 $250 vs 16gb Moto x $575), all things are definitely not equal.
[Nexus 4 General] ziddey:
This is exactly why I am a huge fan of AMOLED and I'm extremely surprised it's not being capitalized on more.

We don't need the pixel density all the time. We don't need the entire 4.7" screen all the time. With amoled, we could potentially see huge battery savings. I wouldn't mind texting in half-res.
[Nexus 4 General] sandy-achar:
AMOLED screens have a very high change of screen burn. And it tends to deteriorate faster. Also the colours are too saturated for my taste. But can't argue with the battery saving part of it. Anyway I would prefer a IPS screen anyday.
[Nexus 4 General] jadeisjaded:
I'd like AMOLED just for battery saving, but I definitely prefer IPS too
[Nexus 4 General] thiagox:
Amoled screens really are very saturated, colors like yellow and gray often appear greenish/orange, whatever.

I think the IPS screens are closer to reality, though when you have the brightness at maximum, are desaturated.
[Nexus 4 General] Smallsmx3:
I had a couple devices with amoled. I definitely don't think there's any battery savings with those panels
[Nexus 4 General] ziddey:
Right, in current usages, there really isn't. The "best" that has been done to accomodate them was the dark status bar / theme starting in Gingerbread. Otherwise, bright/colorful images will actually consume more than a traditional LCD backlight.

What I would like to see are reduced usage modes-- by effectively lowering the pixel density / resolution, say by disabling every other set of RGB, power consumption could effectively be halved. I would have no problem with say a green-only half-res mode for texting.

I guess though the issue is "how often am I texting" vs "how often am I doing something else that would benefit from a full-fledged display"

I could imagine a power-saving e-reader mode being useful...
[Nexus 4 General] albundy2010:
Counting GPU cores is nonsense. The moto x is a dual core and the nexus 4 is a quad. Period end of story.

And Samsung's PR strikes again. Amoled screens don't save power.
[Nexus 4 General] eksasol:
I do like the wide viewing angle, super deep black, and wide color gamut though (just need to be calibrated correctly like a wide gamut monitor). I agree I don't see a difference in battery life.

I avoid Motorola for their locked bootloader and poor updates though.
[Nexus 4 General] Reamer09:
This is what kept me away from the Moto X and when the N4 price dropped to $199 it was a no brainer.

Sent from my Nexus 10
[Nexus 4 General] TreatnHerRight:
N4 gonna be my first non Motorola Phone. #LetTheModdingBegin
[Nexus 4 General] Reamer09:
You've been depriving yourself. I like their build quality and battery life (from what I hear), but I refuse to get a phone that's almost guaranteed to never have the bootloader unlocked.

Sent from my Nexus 4
[Nexus 4 General] Marcb:
But the Moto X has a locked bootloader?!
[Nexus 4 General] Ace42:
But, but the Tegra 4 has 72 GPU cores so it's better than everything, even a single core titan.
[Nexus 4 General] Xmaster8:
Actually Titan has 2688 CUDA cores btw... :)
[Nexus 4 General] shadehh:
Owned!
[Nexus 4 General] boltthrower56:
That is what apple has been doing for years now , google has been taking clues from it's heavy-weight rival.

It's not necessarily bad but quite frankly , i don't want the hardware race to end because the competition is driving companies to make better and better hardware. As we all know , in the end , it all comes down to hardware. There is no denying that the pc industry is dying and i don't wanna give up the performance aspect just because a phone can identify a woman's bra size...
[Nexus 4 General] albundy2010:
Not true.

Apple has always put the best silicon possible in their devices.

They just aren't stupid enough to put s chip in their running at insane clocks and voltages.

They actually design their own cores in the SoC. Compared to any android OEM apple cares more about performance.

They hired some of the best in the game in the chip industry over the years. Invested a ton a money into designing the chips. They care big time.

People saying otherwise simple have no clue what they are talking about.
[Nexus 4 General] Marcb:
Read the whole interview: http://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57597452-94/top-motorola-engineer-defends-moto-x-specs-q-a/

He's absolutelly right...

The processor "penis size" race has to stop...

Innovation does not come in the form of faster processors... that should be just a tool to make the real innovation works...

It's how the user will interact with the phone, what your phone can do to make your life easier...

Android doesn't even use the 4 cores we have available... 90% of time it uses 2 cores for most tasks... and 2 cores at 1.5Ghz is already really fast for anything out there...

Check the Moto X benchmarks... they are better than the Nexus 4 and the phone only has 2 cores...

Mediatek announced the first 8 core processor, which is just ridiculous...

The manufactures should focus on improving today's processors and new technologies instead of just bumping the speeds and cores...

Intel has been doing a damn good job at this in the PC and now with the mobile processors...
[Nexus 4 General] Ace42:
Wow was the sarcasm that hard to see? :what:
[Nexus 4 General] Reamer09:
Also, does anyone know that all 8 cores can be accessed at the same time? This is another big difference between Intel and AMD. AMD has the octacore processor but only one core will run at the full clock rate at a given time while Intel chips can actually make use of their multicore chips 100%.

Disclaimer: I own an AMD FX-8120 and can confirm that only one core will run at 100% load. I cannot prove the claims of the Intel chipset.

Sent from my Nexus 4
[Nexus 4 General] albundy2010:
Motorola marketing nonsense.

Specs do matter. This type of PR nonsense is what you ( moto) needs to say when they are late with a product. One that is launching at a time when krait 400 devices are out.

The processor race needs to never stop. It just needs to change directions. The entire let's ramp up clockspeeds on each chip way higher than what the optimal clock speed is needs to stop. Pumping as much voltage into the these chips that are in modern Intel desktop chips to achieve the clocks.

But to imply that people should stop pushing the silicon is nonsense. There is a reason that devices are coming that fan record 4k video, video hdr, play the demanding games at respectable frame rates without slowing to a crawl with thermal throttling.

I get what your saying and I agree to a extent. But that entire PR crap from moto is a bunch of nonsense. Specs matter. Performance matters

The SoC venders are constantly improving the chips and are not just focusing on clocks and cores. That's just PR nonsense from somebody having to defend a product with a old SoC launching on a new flagship for a flagship price.
[Nexus 4 General] ferrocene:
This is BS or we'd have smartphones and all the other technologies we enjoy now back in the 90s or 80s. You can "innovate" all you want but without 4.0 GHz 22nm processors you wouldn't have the low power laptop and phone CPUs you currently enjoy. You said it yourself above.

It sounds like marketing talk to me, PR someone who knows nothing about high tech history.

Improving today's processors IS bumping up speed and cores. Wtf, I mean, what else is a processor supposed to do? Again you contradict yourself. Photo lithography at 22nm is pretty damn hard to do and they should NOT stop trying to go smaller.

Also, these are totally 2 different disciplines and companies. Just because arm or Intel is making better hardware doesn't stop a software company from innovating all they like.

**** Tracy innovated a TV watch in the 30s but it took cutting edge technology to make it a reality.
[Nexus 4 General] Xmaster8:
Thats the problem of Bulldozer (FX-8120/FX-8150) generation beacuse of new architecture. There were some patches for Windows to improve performance but not im not sure if all cores can run at max speed at once (which would be idioticly insane) :D

For more info search google : windows amd bulldozer patch
[Nexus 4 General] zim2dive:
a lot of the "improvement" focus is actually on IPC (instructions per cycle).. ie. a 2GHz i7 is "faster" (more efficient) than a 2GHz Pentium from 5 years ago. More pipelines, out of order execution, etc. Do more at the same speed and avoid being thermally throttled so you can run at full speed for longer. In a tablet or desktop, you can afford the room for more cooling and keep cranking the GHz.

According to Wikipedia, the Moto X has an MSM8960DT with dual-core Krait 300.. our N4's have an APQ8064 with quad Krait 200.. so the 2 cpu cores in the Moto X are 1 generation newer.. but our N4's have 4 cores. someone may have benchmark #'s, but I don't think we have to feel inferior with the Krait 200 vs. 300.

*IF* the Moto X had come out at the $300 rumored price I would have considered getting one, but only for the official LTE support to see if the signal was better than the mediocre reception I get on my N4 from TMo. (maybe would be no better, and/or not sure how much depends on the antenna design)

All of these phones have more CPU oomph than I ever use. 8 CPU cores would be nothing more than the result of marketing hype. There is no consumer need for that, at least not until software compilers really learn how to take a single task and spread it out over multiple cores. Even in the CAD/tool world, SW ability to do this has been depressingly slow to occur.. on a task with a 10 hour runtime, they maybe figure out how to parallel-ize 10% of that... so 1 hour of your job can run 4x as fast.. ok, great, it still takes 9:15 :)

Consumers always thing "moar" cores is better.. but they are getting very little return for these extra cores. We'd be better off using that section of the chip for other specialty cores, like the always-on mic, language processing, etc.

I suppose on the one hand, Moto claiming 8 cores on here isn't the worst thing... ie. if they can start to "count" the specialty (non CPU) cores, and that satisfies the marketing mania.. then we may end up with chips that do "more" for us (via these "other" cores), vs. simply throwing more CPU cores at us, which we aren't likely to use.