yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Upgrading, Modifying and Unlocking] cruisin-thru:
This might be helpful for rom hacking and linux.

http://www.linuxdevices.com/articles/AT6242500467.html

http://www.linuxdevices.com/articles/AT4800835123.html

http://nms.lcs.mit.edu/~gch/working/ipaq/ipaqflasher
[Moto X General] tags07:
It Live!!! Its Live!!!!

https://sourceforge.net/projects/motox.motorola/files/

Enjoy.
[Moto X General] matt99017d:
I'm a dummy with this stuff, does this open the doors up for the possibility of obtaining root?
[Moto X General] gunnyman:
Doubt it. It's kernel source code
[Moto X General] mattlgroff:
You can get root with any version besides the Retail AT&T and Retail Verizon models. As far as I know, no one is working on a root exploit for those.
[Moto X General] matt99017d:
Boo. I knew it was coming but I'm a poor boy.
[Moto X General] antawnm26:
lol

---------- Post added at 02:42 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:41 AM ----------

Could you explain this is laymen terms? Are you saying that one must flash a rogers software on att/verizon version in order to obtain root? If so is it or would it be possible to go back to your original stock version... So, I am going out on a limb and say that development will be bigger on the dev edition
[Moto X General] mattlgroff:
You cannot flash firmware for another variant with a locked bootloader.

Development will be bigger on the Developer Edition, yes. However, more will come from developers on T-Mobile, Sprint, US Cellular, Rogers, any Brazilian carrier, etc.
[Moto X General] mk1151:
Wouldn't the same root exploit for the Mini, Ultra, and Maxx work on the moto X?

I'd assume someone would work on those.

It should be compatible since it's the same hardware and OS.
[Moto X General] geekabilly:
That's quite an assumption, hombre.
[Moto X General] epinter:
The kernel source for Ultra is the same kernel source for MotoX, only little changes in panel code and makefile.
[Moto X General] geekabilly:
Are you, good Sir, optimistic about the prospect of a root exploit being discovered for the AT&T & VZW devices?
[Moto X General] Dark9781:
What epinter is saying is if a root exploit is discovered for the Ultra then it can easily be modified to gain root on the Moto X.
[Moto X General] hell_lock:
I might give it a shot compiling this kernel. But before that I need the stock kernel.. can anyone please give that to me??

ps-- I dont own this phone. Just doing for getting more experience and learning purposes
[Moto X General] Droyyd:
Does that include moto maker versions?
[Moto X General] mattlgroff:
If its for AT&T or Verizon through Motomaker they will not be unlockable.
[Moto X General] Helvio88:
actually, yes, you can, as long as it's signed.
[Moto X General] mhsbrian:
Well with the kernel source out in the wild we can expect some interesting things here soon, I will be on the watch constantly now.

I expect more cogent hypotheses about root to come for the other models now that we have developer editions out and the kernel source. Being on sprint, I'm already unlocked and waiting for the freight train of development(one hopes).
[Moto X General] mattlgroff:
They use different sigs for each variant and secure version. -_-
[Moto X General] mhsbrian:
I also thought it was funny when I read this, I think the odds of a root exploit are much better than obtaining a signed file... Not meant for your device lol.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] Krishna563:
I have gotten my note 2 water damged. I have dried it out and cleaned it and everything, but there is still one lingering problem. There is a water bubble in the rear camera. I have unassembled it and dried the lens but still its not working properly. So the problem is there is water in the actual rear camera and i wanted to know how to fix it without replacing it.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kintwofan:
Put it in a bag of rice for a day or 2. That should dry everything out
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] EyLaTnOgN:
In a bag full of rice. Oalmeal should work too if youre not inba very asian household.

And rice attracts asians and brings them to your house to fixyour phone ;)
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] adamcooks:
You can also find bulk silica gel at a baking supply store
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] gorjos:
If you have a gas stove you can put the device in the oven for a few nigths (without turn it on) and the minimal heat will dry it. I did that with my old galaxy 550 and worked fine!
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] deeznutz1977:
If everything works except the rear camera, buy a new camera . it only cost 33 dollars http://www.etradesupply.com/oem-samsung-galaxy-note-ii-sgh-t889-back-camera.html
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] Krishna563:
I tried that but there is still water in the rear camera
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kintwofan:
worth a shot, then see deeznutz post above
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] pyraxiate:
The n7100 camera module looks the same. Cant find the factory part numbers for both but it looks like it should work. Only 16 bucks on ebay

http://pages.ebay.com/link/?nav=item.view&id=261268466197
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kintwofan:
Well that website linked by deez has the 7100 camera too. It is only 19 and had a different part number, so if u was a gambling man I'd say it won't work
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] pyraxiate:
Considering the fact the radio, kernel, and OS are pretty much interchangeable between the t889 and n7100, I'd say it uses the same driver. ....... meaning same hardware. Looks identical, same connector, and same drivers...... you think it wont work why?

Both use the tolte kernels and build tree as well.

Besides, I cant imagine Samsung would make multiple camera modules that are all different.... but look alike..... that wouldnt be very cost inefficient for them.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kintwofan:
Based on my stated reasons, the same website list 2 part numbers and 2 different prices.

And to cost efficient why do some have wireless charging and we have to mod ours. The s3 had a thread just like this and you know what, there was a slight size difference they caused it not to work. Will this one work, I don't know I'm just looking at details and made a comment. By the way I'm talking hardware differences. It can be the same core hardware with difference shell causing it not to fit

OH AND THE N7100 IS TO3G THE N7105 IS TOLTE! So you're whole argument is wrong
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] EyLaTnOgN:
BURRNNNN!

For future reference i would take each advice with gratitude and not trying to prove one person wrong. Have an open mind. He is right if you did a little more research you would see he is right.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] pyraxiate:
First of all... the only thing I was wrong about was that the tolte was n7105..... for that, I stand corrected.

HOWEVER.....There is no burn as I am not wrong. Hardware wise the devices are identical as they use the exact same drivers for the cam.

Much like you can use the same driver made for a dlink on a netgear, or belkin wireless card, as long as they all are the same interface ( pci / usb ) and run on the same chipset. Same concept. Different part numbers but the same driver and connection = same device period.

Proof? Refer to this thread... you can port any n7100 rom to an n7105.... and since n7105 is tolte...... as is the t889, all drivers are the same.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2018411

Partitions are laid out differently. ..However....you can modify n7100 roms to work for n7105 and i317. As such, that means the firmware to run the camera module should identical...also meaning the camera hardware is using the same components.

Now.....Since we do use the international note base in some of our t889 builds, ( JediX to name one ), that means the n7105 camera is the same as the t889 at least driver wise.

As long as the connection to the motherboard is the same, which it appears to be, and it has the same driver to control the hardware, he should be good to go. Ill order one next week just to try ......

Never go 100% based on part numbers ... I worked for Ricoh as a field technician ( digital imaging + digital copy equipment ) ...we used the same 5 photo sensors for 30+ machines. All had different part numbers but were all interchangeable. Part numbers were different so there was accountability for which models used sensors more.

One more thing. Some one also documented that when they tore down their phone, there were multiple models printed on the ribbons and other hardware ( i317 , n7105 etc ). Im willing to bet that there are n7100 parts in some of our phones anyway.....
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kintwofan:
Well congratulations you win. I don't waste my time arguing with fools on the internet. I made a very simple comment that if I was a gambling man I would bet it wouldn't work, that's it then you had to turn it into a in right you're wrong thing. So go ahead you win, you're also exactly why I'm getting tired of xda.

Also, I'm not going by part number only. In your rant you missed the fact I said we had this exact scenario on the Verizon s3 and there was a slight difference in size that didn't allow it to fit.

But go in with your Internet gangster self, you're a bad man and the smartest person here.

I'd like to remind you on one thing though. You're talking about the RON being interchangeable. The"drivers" are in the kernel, which is not interchangeable. Try a TO3G kernel on your phone and let me know how that works out.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] pyraxiate:
Wasn't trying to "win" for one. I was merely giving support for my theory. That whole comment was to the person who made the "burnnnnnn" comment. As far as this topic goes, I already said im going to buy the cheaper camera and give it a shot to be sure... its not a big deal to test things out. You keep doing you bro.... I harbor no ill feelings towards you.

Also...I never claimed to be the end all to be all. I DO however have experience as an electrical / mechanical technician and worked on circuit boards / imaging equipment following point to point schematics..... Im not just some Internet made want to be know it all.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] mihaly_n:
Can somebody please post the build.prop for the YAKJUXW?

I need it cause I deleted the old one and I had to search over the internet for one. I was running stock withouth adb so I managed to fastboot boot into CWM and send a cwm zip with the build.prop via sideload but I need replacements please asap...

thank you
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] mihaly_n:
OK back to stock :)

managed to pull the file myself... here for other, and for further reference

# begin build properties
# autogenerated by buildinfo.sh
ro.build.id=JOP40D
ro.build.display.id=JOP40D.I9250XWMA2
ro.build.version.incremental=I9250XWMA2
ro.build.version.sdk=17
ro.build.version.codename=REL
ro.build.version.release=4.2.1
ro.build.date=Fri Jan 25 01:40:33 KST 2013
ro.build.date.utc=1359045633
ro.build.type=user
ro.build.user=dpi.sec
ro.build.host=DELL123
ro.build.tags=release-keys
ro.product.model=Galaxy Nexus
ro.product.brand=samsung
ro.product.name=yakjuxw
ro.product.device=maguro
ro.product.board=tuna
ro.product.cpu.abi=armeabi-v7a
ro.product.cpu.abi2=armeabi
ro.product.manufacturer=samsung
ro.product.locale.language=en
ro.product.locale.region=US
ro.wifi.channels=
ro.board.platform=omap4
# ro.build.product is obsolete; use ro.product.device
ro.build.product=maguro
# Do not try to parse ro.build.description or .fingerprint
ro.build.description=yakjuxw-user 4.2.1 JOP40D I9250XWMA2 release-keys
ro.build.fingerprint=samsung/yakjuxw/maguro:4.2.1/JOP40D/I9250XWMA2:user/release-keys
ro.build.characteristics=nosdcard
# end build properties
#
# system.prop for maguro
#

rild.libpath=/vendor/lib/libsec-ril.so
rild.libargs=-d /dev/ttys0
telephony.lteOnCdmaDevice=0

# Ril sends only one RIL_UNSOL_CALL_RING, so set call_ring.multiple to false
ro.telephony.call_ring.multiple=0

#
# ADDITIONAL_BUILD_PROPERTIES
#
ro.com.android.dateformat=MM-dd-yyyy
ro.com.android.dataroaming=false
ro.url.legal=http://www.google.com/intl/%s/mobile/android/basic/phone-legal.html
ro.url.legal.android_privacy=http://www.google.com/intl/%s/mobile/android/basic/privacy.html
ro.com.google.clientidbase=android-google
ro.error.receiver.system.apps=com.google.android.feedback
ro.error.receiver.default=com.samsung.receiver.error
ro.setupwizard.mode=ENABLED
ro.setupwizard.enterprise_mode=1
ro.config.ringtone=Girtab.ogg
ro.config.notification_sound=Proxima.ogg
ro.config.alarm_alert=Cesium.ogg
ro.carrier=unknown
keyguard.no_require_sim=true
drm.service.enabled=true
wifi.interface=wlan0
media.aac_51_output_enabled=true
ro.opengles.version=131072
ro.sf.lcd_density=320
ro.hwui.disable_scissor_opt=true
dalvik.vm.heapstartsize=8m
dalvik.vm.heapgrowthlimit=96m
dalvik.vm.heapsize=256m
dalvik.vm.heaptargetutilization=0.75
dalvik.vm.heapminfree=512k
dalvik.vm.heapmaxfree=8m
ro.com.google.gmsversion=4.2_r1
dalvik.vm.dexopt-flags=m=y
net.bt.name=Android
dalvik.vm.stack-trace-file=/data/anr/traces.txt
[Nexus 7 (2013) Q&A] mowz9999:
Is anyone else experiencing wifi just cutting out but still shows you are conected? Only fix is to turnwifi off then back on, Is there any different way or should I send it back to google?
[Nexus 7 (2013) Q&A] cazman420:
I am having same issue.
[Nexus 7 (2013) Q&A] huizingajm:
I have had the Google Services(Blue Icons) drop a couple times. One of the times anything i did would not fix it. Finally came back after about 15 minutes. Is that the issue you are having?
[Nexus 7 (2013) Q&A] mowz9999:
No but I think my issue might have been related to the router I was using. I connected to a defferent one now and no drop so far!:cyclops:
[Nexus 7 (2013) Q&A] huizingajm:
I have had issue with that before. I was on a blekin before and after 10 minutes even with stay connected on i would freeze up. My new netgear I have no issues what so ever.
[Nexus 7 (2013) Q&A] mowz9999:
It kind of sucks do that the internet cuts out at wok every 2 min wish there was a fix
[Nexus 7 (2013) Q&A] bob8x:
I have the same problem, it happened twice at home in 2 days while not even once at work....

I noticed a little thing: router config page was accessible like a DNS problem.... Next time I'll try to reach google with direct IP...

Inviato dal mio Nexus 7 usando XDA Premium HD app
[Nexus 7 (2013) Q&A] R930:
No WiFi issues here, I would say it is most likely the router playing up.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mike4peace:
i have s3. i rooted the phone then tried to install flash miui v5 via with but failed -i guess- because phone is lack of cwm. so i installed cwm but the phone wouldnt boot to recover mode, instead there was always original recovery mode. so i tried again and again but still anything change. then i tried to unlock bootloder with a app named ez lock i guess i did it but after something my phone went to download mode by itself and there is nothing else. top left there is no version info. just download mode with a green android guy. i removed battery and take it back, and tried to open download mode again there was infos top left screen this time. but when i tried to enter recovery mode it just load something in cwm recovery then there is again download mode without infos top left.

now im downloading stock rom, hope it'll work. is there anything else i can do guys? please help me, im not good at this stuff..
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kangerX:
Tried to Flash stock firmware ?

sent from the state where marijuana is NOT illegal !!
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] JJEgan:
Bootloader ??? do you actually have a I9300 as bootloader is not locked .

please help me, im not good at this stuff..	That would be due to not bothering to read the faqs and guides first .

My guess is that you have bricked your phone and need a paid for service repair .
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mike4peace:
i tried to flash to stock rom with odin, but somehow it failed to flash :S then phone stucked at a screen that says "firmware upgrade encountered an issue. please select recovery mode in kies & try again. then i found this http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2261153 and my phone opened.

i have a question though, why didnt cwm open in the phone? if it had opened i would've install miui
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] boomboomer:
Things went wrong because you didn't read or follow the many guides on XDA that other members wrote to help you. Guessing what to do can be very expensive.

CWM didn't open because you flashed in onto a stock ROM, which immediately restored a stock recovery.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mike4peace:
but i couldnt install miui because cwm wouldnt open, before that i had stock rom which same now too. anyway now i have rooted 4.1.2 stock rom of samsung with counter 7 :laugh:
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Raiden350:
Hello, I've made some research about the port of the Xperia Z lockscreen for Nexus 4 and I see this lockscreen is available for Touchwiz devices, for some HTC too but I don't find mod for Nexus 4.

Someone can help ? Thanks !

Envoyé depuis mon Nexus 4 en utilisant Tapatalk 4
[Galaxy S 4 General] maxell505:
I am looking to get a Galaxy S4 and I am definately going to get stock android on it. I just don't want to lose all of the S-features like hover and s-view and all of those motions. Is there any way I can get a stock rom with some customizations and also keep all of the features. I am probably not going to use the features but it is just something I can show my friends and stuff.
[Galaxy S 4 General] tollboy:
You must look andriod development section of the s4 at xda (Not original andriod devlopment).

In above forum developers put great efforts to tweak the roms as per their taste. These custom roms are built by modifying/stripping/hacking samsung stock rom. So you will get all the features you want +a custom rom. :)

---------- Post added at 07:53 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:49 AM ----------

http://xdaforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2286

Here is the link for the forum. It is for i9500. Similar exists for i9505
[Galaxy S 4 General] donalgodon:
No, there's not. You must choose between largely useless fluff and stock Android. Just a suggestion: If you really want to have the best experience with stock Android, go for the 9505. With that, you have the option of a) stock ROM b) Google Edition ROM and c) Cyanogen or AOSP ROM all of which run very well on it, but don't on the 9500 thanks to Exynos.
[Sprint HTC One (M7)] SantinoInc:
http://en.miui.com/thread-6831-1-1.html

If any of you guys are MIUI fans and would like to see it get an official port please take the time to make an account for the English MIUI site and vote in the thread listed above. Whichever phone gets more votes will get the official release first.

Thanks for your time!
[Sprint HTC One (M7)] misfit0313:
Already voted!
[Sprint HTC One (M7)] eXplicit815:
I just watched a video of MIUI v5 and that's pretty freakin' impressive. HTC should take a couple notes here. I wonder though, if they decide to officially support the HTC One, is it going to be for International versions only, or would it work completely with Sprint's model? I'd be willing to root my phone to get an official version of this, but only if it's not something we have to port.
[Sprint HTC One (M7)] naturecannon:
Saw a thread exactly like this here last week and voted ::good:

Maybe it was the international HTC one forum where i saw this topic :confused:

EDIT: Nope it was in here REPOST
[Sprint HTC One (M7)] SantinoInc:
oh, didn't see that. well i won't quite apologize for making this thread if it helps lead to more votes for the HTC ONE.

i'm actually contemplating trading my HTC ONE for a S4 because they have a more functional version of MIUI up and running.
[Sprint HTC One (M7)] xadidas4lifex:
it would be official for the international version of the phone.

we have the sprint variant.

the WHOLE WORLD uses GSM.

Sprint uses CDMA.

so we would have to port the official one to work with our radios.
[General Topics] jam-22:
I tried to do the upgrade for the MDA Compact T-Mobile, but it was stuck and on the screen it was showing on the top SERIAL and on the bottom ver 1.0. So please help me out here!
[Galaxy S III Accessories] Badelhas:
I Just saw a review of this case for the galaxy S4 and its perfect. It protects the front and the back at the same time.

Is there anything similar for the S3?
[Galaxy S III Accessories] 1slow4G:
theres a good thread in this forum with pictures and everything.
[Galaxy S III Accessories] Badelhas:
Can you please post the link? Thanks
[Galaxy S III Accessories] 1slow4G:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2377683
[Galaxy S III Accessories] Badelhas:
Thanks but That's not what I asked. I want to know about a Spigen Slim Armor VIEW for our S3, with the front flip cover protection.

http://www.spigen.com/galaxy-s4-case-slim-armor-view.html
[Galaxy S III Accessories] bigun66:
spigen slim armor does not exist for galaxy s3

the case you want is not available for S3.

I'd suggest looking at this one: elago G5 Slim Fit Case for Galaxy S3

9 bucks on Amazon, prime shipping, lots of color choices.

It doesn't provide a lot of protection, but I'd say it's good enough for most drops.

I'm not sure why people want to protect the front screen. I keep my phone in my pocket with keys and other things and have never managed to scratch the gorilla glass.
[Galaxy S III Accessories] Badelhas:
I have the Samsung original protective cover plus on my S3 and it's great. Good protection and excellent design, similar to the phone's design. I thought it was enough. But taking it from my pocket it slipped from my hand. I managed to have good reflexes and made it hit on my foot but after that in landed on the ground. The ground was not plane so the glass broke. Very small and stupid fall and it broke instantly. Everything works but it looks terrible. It's 140 euros to change it on a store or I can try changing it myself for 30 euros, risking damaging the phone forever. That is why I want a case like that but one that is not a horrible pouch, which I don't like. (seems like a condom). I, like yourself, also thought that a non slim and full body case was over the top, like the otterbox defender, until it happened to me.
[Galaxy S III Accessories] 1slow4G:
Ohhh mybad
[Xperia Z Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] battelready:
Which one works the best on the Xperia Z
[Xperia Z Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Apollo89:
Sony's stock Messaging app. But SMS/MMS is so old school. I mainly use WhatsApp and I have Viber too.
[Xperia Z Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dirtyjeff:
I use Handcent SMS which the black theme. It is a free app and I think it looks better than the stock Sony one because the main colour is black. The stock one isn't the best for when it is sitting on my desk at work due to the washed out whites.
[Xperia Z Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ckyy:
Aosp

Gesendet von meinem C6603 mit Tapatalk 4
[Xperia Z Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] warface:
Use Handcent, only because I've always used it on my other handsets.

Stock was perfectly fine for me.
[Xperia Z Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] DoubleYouPee:
Uhhh...who still uses SMS?
[Xperia Z Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kingvortex:
Plenty of people still use SMS.

1. I have unlimited SMS on my plan.

2. You can still send/receive them when data coverage is spotty/non-existent and IM apps may struggle.

3. Everyone has SMS capabilities on their phone, so I can contact anyone without worrying if they use the same messenger as me etc.
[Xperia Z Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] groupama3:
Handcent with darkness theme all the way..
[Xperia Z Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Richy99:
go sms with the dark theme
[Xperia Z Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] 37vincent:
Textra
[Xperia Z Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] luislyricz:
I use icmess beta awesome layout