yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] glcK23:
2013 nexus 7 :good:
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] tweaked:
Nexus 7 flo.

I think its supposed to be a sarcastic joke on the I Pad. get it. Pad, NFlo. :laugh:

Ok, I wasn't really laughing and I don't really think the above.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Username invalid:
Nexus 7 Nakasi

Nexus 7 Nakasig

Nexus 7 Flo
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] hfase:
Is "flo" the codename?

I am trying to get some ROMs going on for this as I might buy one Wed but I am still confused as to what the device codename is. :(

I will search around some more though I guess.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Crooke356:
I started to create a thread on this last night but figured I'd wait for someone else to do it. To make it easy on deciding, gather as many opinions on the official nickname as possible and after a pre determined count, take the average and hopefully enough people will recognize it as the 'nickname'.

My vote Nexus 7.2 (N7.2)
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Sib64:
No, Nakasi (Wifi) & Nakasig (3G) are for the previous version of Nexus 7.

And if you go to the Google Git, you will see that the nickname is FLO => Google Git = android / device/asus/flo ;)
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Username invalid:
Yes, that is how to distinguish them.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] tweaked:
Yeah flo is the code name.... Haha

But google can KISS MAH GRI-YITS!. I ain't using it.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Sn00ky:
How about NexTus? :D
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] hfase:
Thank you! I just get weary relying on Google results, and prefer confirmation.

Last time I bought a device I just googled it and thought I was going to get a "Sunfire" (Photon 4G) but ended up with a "Asanti" (Photon Q LTE)...
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] conan1600:
Nexus 7 B
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] BoneXDA:
"My Next Device"
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] RojasTKD:
Yeah, who knows. I'd prefer a better naming convention. I'm sticking with Nexus 7 (2013).

I can see some confusing coming from this, especially when people start looking for accessories. I already read a Best Buy review where the guy mention how much his daughter loved the tablet he got her, but the hers doesn't have a rear camera.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] XBIRDIE98:
Google's Support website refers to it as the "Nexus 7 (2013)" while last year's model is referred to as "Nexus 7 (2012)". For the moment, this convention seems reasonable, but I think calling it "Nexus 7 (2nd generation)" or "Nexus 7 flo" is equally clear.

Link: https://support.google.com/nexus/7/answer/3257354?hl=en&ref_topic=3042498
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] dragonboydbboy:
So, nobody else finds the name "flo" funny? Anybody from Colorado or Washington?...
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] HKSpeed:
What does FHD stand for?

I thought the 2012 Nexus 7 was called "grouper"

Sent from my phone.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] eep2378:
"Flo Jo" :D
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] IamPro:
My bad mother****er tablet
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] RojasTKD:
Note from Florida, and I don't get it...

I assumed it was, "Full HD", because of the 1080P display (1920 x 1200).
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] dragonboydbboy:
Flo was a cannabis cup winner...

Not a coincidence I think, Google!
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] negroplasty:
Actually, isn't the codename Razor? I thought it was Razor and the board name is flo. Similar to how the Nexus 4 is the Occam and board name is mako.

Device - Codename - Board name

Nexus 4 - Occam - mako

Nexus 7 (2013) Wifi - Razor - flo

See: https://developers.google.com/android/nexus/images#occam
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] mi7chy:
Unofficially, N7 Retina or N7 FHD.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] arcanexvi:
It's proper marketing name is Nexus 7 (2013)
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] cdmoore74:
2013 is smart but not cool. Flo is fine but it's more of a product code word. Nexus 7 FHD sounds cheap and what about next year?

Google should have done Nexus 7 R2. So when the 10 incher gets updated they can call it Nexus 10 R2. Next year Nexus 7 R3 and so on.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] lacrossev:
Its a good thing the 2013 is fairly light, or there might be some "man my flo is heavy" misunderstandings here and there.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] BrianDigital:
but what fish is FLO

FLOunder?
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] player911:
Flo is the internal name. My galaxy nexus is called Tuna... But I sure as hell don't want to call my phone Tuna all day. Lol

Also what does OG Nexus 7 mean referring to last gen? "Old Gen"?

I like Nexus 7 razor cause that's what it feels like.

The first gen was just referred to as N7. I hate typing first gen, second gen, new, old, OG, FHD, etc

I think I'm just gonna used what was referred to earlier as N71 and N72.

Quick and easy.

Sent from Nexus 7 FHD from XDA Premium HD
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] zaclimon:
Why just not calling it N7 2nd gen and/or writing N7v2 when we want to specify it? Looks like apple marketing with their *new* ipad.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] brainard52:
ro.build.product and ro.product.board are flo, but ro.product.name is razor. Maybe this can clear some things up.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] droidnext:
They just simply call Nexus 7 2013 so when next year it will be Nexus 7 2014. Just like cars, people ask what car you have?? I have 2013 Mustang.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] androidtoy09:
Agree, I hope everyone can just settle with Nexus7 2013 and call it a day.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Sib64:
Maybe its' the end

I think that I have find the answer:

If you go to the Git of the device, and search a little bit, you will see that:

source ../../../common/clear-factory-images-variables.sh
BUILD=741250
[B][COLOR="Blue"]DEVICE=flo[/COLOR]
[COLOR="Red"]PRODUCT=razor[/COLOR][/B]
VERSION=jss15
#SRCPREFIX=signed-
BOOTLOADER=flo-03.10.2
source ../../../common/generate-factory-images-common.sh
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] player911:
So technically the Device is called the Razor. The internal name is Flo.

So Nexus Razor? NR?

Sent from Nexus 7 FHD from XDA Premium HD
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] TheManii:
I didnt bother reading the middle pages, but:

Wifi Model:

Marketing name: Nexus 7

Play market url: Nexus 7 (2013)

Name in help pages: Nexus 7 (2013)

Rom branch name: Razor

Device name: Flo

Board name: Flo

Motherboard model number: ME371K

Device model number: K008

LTE Model differences:

Marketing name: Nexus 7

Play market url: unknown

name in help pages: Nexus 7 (2013) LTE

Rom branch name: Razorg

Device name: Deb

Board Name: Deb (unconfirmed)

Motherboard model number: ME371KL (unconfirmed)

Device model number: K009

These will be revealed when the 2013 N7 LTE is actually released

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Goog refers to it as the Nexus 7 (2013) and Nexus 7 (2013) LTE in their help pages.

For the purposes of the xda wiki pages, I refer to them in the same manner.

Calling it Nexus razor is definitely "wrong" as noone refers to the N4 as the nexus occam.

For the GN, the rom branch name is only brought up when it's relevent: usually when otas are involved.

Calling it flo would be "correct" in the context of roms though, as roms usually have the device name in their filenames to refer to what device it's for.

Like how grouper/tilapia roms shouldn't be assumed to be compatible unless the author states so, deb and flo roms shouldn't either.

You can call it whatever the hell you want as noone's going to stop you, as long as it's unambiguous.

It doesnt necessarily mean that you're using the "correct" name though.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Some background info:

Some devices have multiple rom branches for a device:

Galaxy Nexus GSM:

rom branch name:

Takju: models bought via play in the us

Yakju: models bought everywhere else

YakjuXX: models supported by samsung directly and not google

All GN's have the same board name, but different device names:

Board name: tuna

device name:

GSM GN: maguro

vzw GN: toro

spr GN: toroplus

Some devices have similar roms, but not identical ones:

Nexus 7 wifi:

device name: grouper

rom branch name: nakasi

nexus 7 3g

device name: tilapia

rom branch name: nakasig

Update: added deb's primary rom branch: razorg

Update: added model number: K009
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Sib64:
Thanks for all the information

So if we use "Flo" as name for this device, it would be better than "razor", is it correct ?
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] lyrad12:
flo? is that name of the character from diner dash? i vote for nexus7pro. lol
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] TheManii:
IF you're refering only to the 2013 N7 wifi: yes.

If you want to refer to them both, just say "2013 N7" (or N7 2013/whatever) without reference to wifi/LTE

If you want to specifically refer to their boards (for rom purposes), it's: flo/deb

Though I would not expect it to, asus or goog could put out a 2nd rom for flo devices.

If that happened then calling it razor could become ambiguous if the roms are more or less compatable.

Yakju and takju are virtually identical beyond the fact takju has google wallet included in the rom.

Any mods to one branch rom should be valid on the other generally.

I really wouldnt expect this to happen, but it's not impossible.

While these were never in the wild, there were 3 branch roms for the N4/mako:

occam: the primary branch 99.9995% of people have

occamf: an unknown branch rom that was demoed with 4.3 before google IO13

full_mako: a generic branch name used by LG when building their factory rom for mako

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] player911:
The purpose of this thread really is to find a shorthand when typing on the go using a mobile. For example Nexus7 = N7. I don't want to type out "New Nexus 7 (2013-07-31 013403) Flo Razor Ultimate Pro" each time. lol

I'm just thinking something like ON7 or NN7, or N71 or N72. Something quick.

Like N7HD. I like that. I think I'll stick with that.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] zaclimon:
I know I proposed this a couple of pages ago but why not use these names:

Development names: Flo/Deb (razor would be used but it's rare that it is used, like occam for the N4)

"Normal names": N7v2, N7G2, Even N7mk2 loool. Or N7HD as well as N7FHD or N7S4 (because of it's chipset).
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Geodude074:
learned onuxesu

I'm going to start calling it the N7v2. :good:
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] [TSON]:
nexus 7 sponsored by progressive

(Put me down for Nexus 7 HD. Easy to remember. N7HD. None of this Nexus 7.2 "my screen is .2 inches bigger than the old one!" confusion)
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] rkennison:
I say we call it "Bob". No confusion with the other nexus 7 that way.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] blackhand1001:
I would have been much happier with that lol than just flo. Although names like grouper, tilapia, and wingray are still much cooler sounding for tablets.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Waynato:
N72 sounds good
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Tondern:
That sounds like some old Nokia phone.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] player911:
I like the N7HD. Easy enough.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] zaclimon:
What if a new generation comes out? it will likely take on an HD display like this one too.

Anyway it'll be what it be. I'll adopt either N7HD, N7v2 or N7 2nd gen.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] thenrik:
Hi:

Anything but Flo. Nexus 7 2013 makes the most sense to me.

Tom
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] catlog:
Nexus 7 2013 or Flo.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] shreddintyres:
Since we dont know whether there is going to be a difference between the Wifi and LTE versions, lets just assume there will be because the radios will definitely be different eg different RIL so we should have something to designate that is 2nd gen and wifi. my suggestions:

N7-2W

N7WHD-2

N7-2 (Wifi) and for the LTE version N7-2 (LTE)

I wouldnt be averse to calling it the N7r (short for N7 razor)

N7F2 (N7 Flo 2nd gen)

etc

or something along these lines.

maybe a poll of the most popular is in order to get a community decision on the name.

Any how that's my 2 cents

- Cheers
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] bigneckbeard:
FLO is the name of a fish from Finding Nemo. Thanks for deleting my post mod.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Moscow Desire:
Considering this was already determined starting at,

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=44047013&postcount=3

Why continue as it's redundant?

(and you know why your other post was deleted) ;)

MD
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] tillingmygrave:
I vote for N7II [Nexus 7 IInd Edition]
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] lorddralnu:
I like what was stated earlier:

Name for Development - Flo (for the wifi version)

Name for other uses - N7v2 and N7v2 LTE (if you need to distinguish the LTE version that is)

and if N7v2 is too difficult, then N7 2.

This method provides expandability without causing confusion

Done.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] juryben:
Amazon.com calls it Nexus 7 FHD. I like that.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] stealthj:
That's not right though. It should not be called FHD. FHD is the name for 1080p resolution (1920x1080), our device has a WUXGA resolution (1920x1200)...

so i like Nexus 7 2 more

or... the new nexus 7 as my friends refer to it
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] player911:
I'm sticking with N7HD

Sent from Nexus 7 FHD from XDA Premium HD
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] californiarailroader:
The device formerly known as the Nexus 7 :D
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] e.mote:
Call it N7, and OG N7 for the gen1.

A nick is good as long as people know what you're referring to. Since this is the gen2 forum, by default people associate N7 with new N7 unless you specify OG N7. There may be some confusion for the next few weeks, and you can specify 'new N7' if you deem it necessary, but it probably isn't.

When comparisons between different gens are done, then apply gen1/gen2/v1/v2/year, etc. Again the point is as long as people understand what the nick refers to, and no more. KISS.

Tech toys get old fast, especially for techies. OG N7 is already yesterday's news. N7 now refers to the "new" N7. For next year, recurse.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] californiarailroader:
No, no, THIS is the Flo I grew up with!
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] cyberprodigy:
I've seen people call it the Nexus 7.2 as well which makes no sense to me whatsoever since the "7" is meant to represent the 7-inch screen size.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Muhaimen Ayyub:
Simplicity is Better.

My vote is New Nexus 7.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Gytole:
Its most definitely called the "Flo". You guys need to get with it. Get it? Haha
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Qoaa:
I've been calling it Nexus 7 2nd gen

:)

my other device is an old ipod touch 3rd gen so the "gen" thing has stuck with me.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] RojasTKD:
That will only work until the next "New" Nexus 7 arrives next year.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Xanthius Balaraw:
I always hear Nexus 7 2nd gen
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] TheManii:
Looks like the model number for deb is K009

Until someone does a teardown on it, I'm going to assume it's internally the ME371KL

Updated long post with info, I'll keep it updated up to launch time
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Chasroach:
CPU-Z identifies the model as Nexus 7 (razor).
[General Questions and Answers] randun:
Is there a Forum here that discusses tablet-laptop hybrids in general rather than by specific model?

Thanks.
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 General] KT:
hi iam using o2 mini

and i just upgraded its rom to the 1.11 qtek version

but

when i connect via active syn using the microsoft stack on both mini and my laptop ..

it keeps on saying OPENING PORT asnd then says that the port is busy or being used by some other device

i have matched the port available to the one in active syn

but

its not working

tried other ports too

dont know what to do ???!!?!?!?!?!?!?

PLEASE HELP
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 General] duke911:
check this link

http://howardforums.com/showthread.php?t=544932
[JAM, MDA Compact, S100 General] KT:
THANKS A LOT FOR THAT LINK MAN

IT SOLVED MY PROBLEM

THANKS A TON

APPRECIATE IT
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] czobor:
Hi.

I've started following this guide: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Porting

Here is my progress:

https://github.com/czobor/android_device_samsung_ariesve/tree/phablet-saucy

https://github.com/czobor/samsung-kernel-msm7x30/tree/phablet-saucy

What else is needed to get it boot?

You can try building it if you follow Xistance's great guide: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1915412, just at

write

repo init -u git@github.com:czobor/android.git -b phablet-saucy

XDA:DevDB Information

Ubuntu Touch, a ROM for the Samsung Galaxy S I9000

Contributors

czobor

Version Information

Status: Testing

Created 2013-09-15

Last Updated 2013-09-15
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] krislibaeer:
you need the vendor files https://github.com/ivendor/android_vendor_samsung_ariesve/tree/jellybean branch jellybean

and have fun it is not that easy :)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] czobor:
I know, but we shouldn't modificate that.

Tapatalk 4 Bétával küldve GT-I9001-ről
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] mrjraider:
Good luck with this project :)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] TheTechnolgyhelper:
Good luck :)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] android_smiley:
Good Luck! PM me when you will need a tester ;)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] metalrules321:
Oh my !! this looks interesting. I'll be keeping a close watch on this project. Good luck mate. Awaiting more progress :D
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] chrisg4:
good luck with your project
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Xistance:
You are going to need a few more kernel changes that aren't in the guide to get it to boot. Have fun and good luck though :).
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] edisile:
:fingers-crossed:

Hope you will get it to boot. If you need testers I'm here too.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] 1989mayank:
This looks interesting..... all the best :)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] czobor:
Nevermind, got it.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] czobor:
First test release

First succesfull build.

Ubuntu touch comes ino files.

The first one:

http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-to.../current/saucy-preinstalled-phablet-armhf.zip

The second one:

http://d-h.st/JLd

Please test them, but note that Ubuntu Touch for Galaxy S Plus is provided with no warranty. You are installing this software at your own risk. You may be violating your warranty.

Flash them in this order.

Perhaps you'll need cm10.1 before starting flashing anything, and perhaps you'll have to wipe everything. (source: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2188621)

There's no warranty that it'll boot!

I didn't test it.

Edit: chekkko10 wrote it doesn't boot :(

Edit: he sad it boots, but after some seconds the device powers off.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] edisile:
:highfive: I'll give it a sort tomorrow. Hope that it will boot.

My signature:
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] speedwayfan75:
Hope that too. So, we have to flash both files?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] edisile:
Yeah, first one is Ubuntu, the second one device related.

My signature:
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] czobor:
Yes. The first one is prebuilt, the second one isn't.

Edit: 1 sec...

Tapatalk 4 Bétával küldve GT-I9001-ről
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] czobor:
Sorry for double.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] speedwayfan75:
Thanks guys, i'll try it definitively tomorrow and give you feedback.:D
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Xistance:
I might be able to get it booting. I'll send you the changes by tomorrow as I can't build currently.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Luzmo:
Tried the test build, doesn't boot. No bootanimation, just black screen for a while and shut down.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] coronero:
Same as others reported:

- black screen on boot with the buttons backlight always on, and then restarts.

Thanks for the build attempts anyway. Will be glad to test future builds.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] edisile:
Same here... Backlight always on for 2-3 minutes then sudden shutdown. At least you managed to build it. Keep going on.

My signature:
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] :
hey mate nice work ...

using daily ubuntu images or MWC one ..?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] czobor:
Two new test releases, with minimal modifications, so don't except too much, but perhaps...

The instructions are the same, just replace the ubuntu_touch_test1-ariesve.zip with ubuntu_touch_test2-ariesve.zip or ubuntu_touch_tes3-ariesve.zip

test 2

http://d-h.st/Eyn

test 3

http://d-h.st/B3B
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] coronero:
test build2 - restarted after about 15-20 secs, shutdown second time

test build3 - shutdown after a minute or so
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] edisile:
Shutdowns with both... With test 3 after much more time than test 2.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] XeLLaR*:
Well done, czobor. Keep it up :thumbup:
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] czobor:
One more...

http://d-h.st/r6P

Please flash this zip before, and just after it flash this: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-to.../current/saucy-preinstalled-phablet-armhf.zip

So not like I previously sad.

Do a full wipe, including cache, dalvik cache and data.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] android_smiley:
Gonna test in 10 minutes and report after it :D

Thanks! :D
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] sapsa:
Monitoring this right know.... interesting
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] milkec:
I can not wait your opinion.

This is something really new for our cell phone.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Calin:
So guys its rebooting again or its remaining stable?

P.S I can't test it because I'm on holidays
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] edisile:
I'll give it a shot tomorrow. Right now I'm out.

My Signature:
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] metalrules321:
Well..this project certainly looks very intriguing and Im all down for it, unfortunately the progress seems to be going *really* slow. No offence OP :)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] android_smiley:
Sadly not working.

Same problem as before but it doesn't turns off. At least the the button light is working :p

Keep up the great work! :D

---------- Post added at 09:38 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:36 PM ----------

Why is it saying something with phablet?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] coronero:
No success yet with build 4 either - shutdown after about a minute. (flashed as czobor said - first the test build, afterwards the ubuntu image).
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] czobor:
This one comes with just a repo sync, includes sqlite, but I din't know if it is what we need.

test 5

http://d-h.st/Osl

Insatll:

1. ubuntu_touch_test5-ariesve.zip

2. saucy-preinstalled-phablet-armhf.zip
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Xistance:
My build already had sqlite3 and it didn't boot. Can't say the same about yours though as I didn't test. It just seems to me like it doesn't deploy ubuntu properly.

Edit: It seems as though ubuntu gets deployed to /data/ and there isn't enough space in that partition. We could try editing the updater_script to deploy it to /sdcard/ but this would take around 1GB of user space.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] edisile:
Well, for now is just a test build so is ok also if you make it boot from sdcard... The priority is making it work, everything else should come later.