yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 General] SL:
Downloading it. Lets hope it is everything we hope for!!!!!
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 General] jokz23:
i don´t have the password for the imate link....

can anyone give a direct link for the wwe or upload it to the ftp?

thnx
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 General] cane:
Hi,

go to ftp://ftp.clubimate.com/

and download

PDA2k_WWE_14000_176_11200.exe

or

PDA2k_Arabic_14000_169_11200.exe

or

PDA2k_French_14002_167_11200.exe

Regards
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 General] SL:
I am uploading to the upload section as I am typing.

Give it some time for the upload to complete.
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 General] plemax:
So no WM 2005...too bad.
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 General] SL:
LOL WM2005 will costs us some $$$. It is not going to be free.
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 General] plemax:
I agree just give me that goddamn thing. :lol:
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 General] plemax:
http://www.clubimate.com/support/PDA2K/ROM/PDA2k_WWE_14000_176_11200.exe
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 General] mwang:
MDAIIIuser :

I already upload to BA upload folder,please move to wiki,Thanks
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 General] double_ofour:
I think this thread should be move in "Blue Angel" section not in Himalaya
[LG Optimus L9 P760, P765, P768, P769] toonani172:
Hi guys,i was trying to flash this rom ,but then something went wrong with my phone and it boots into LG Security Error screen

I can't get it to S/W update ,i can get it into LG recovery but when the lg support tool can flash it over 4%,it's stuck there

i think it has something to do with my bootloader being locked and i tried to flash a unlocked-bootloader-required Rom

Help me ,please :(
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sprocket87:
I've got a rooted HTC One on T-Mobile that has worked fine for a couple months. Last week I got a SIM card error a few times and the cell connection was lost until I rebooted, at which point the SIM card error went away and the cell connection (voice and data) worked again.

As of yesterday, my cell connection is not working at all, no bars of service. I do not have a SIM card error displaying in my status bar either. Everything looks fine, just no cell service. It's not a network problem; my wife's phone works fine.

I've tried checking my mobile data settings and pulling and re-inserting my SIM card, but the problem still exists.

Fortunately WiFi works fine so I can still make calls when I have a connection, but obviously this is not sustainable. So... What do I do?

I'm rooted but running the stock ROM. Would it be worth it to flash and wipe? Really seems like a hardware issue to me. Do I have to contact HTC directly about warranty repair/replacement? How long does that process take and is my being rooted going to cause an issue?

Sad :(
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] biohaz55:
Get a sim card replacement and try that
[General Questions and Answers] Rasritz:
Can anyone tell me how to go back to the list of songs in an album in Poweramp? When I start playing a song and want to go back to look at the other songs on the album, it always seems to send me back out to the main menu.

Thanks
[General Questions and Answers] abhi7395:
Touch in this area, you will back to album songs...:D

View attachment 2146495
[General Questions and Answers] Rasritz:
Awesome!! Thanks for that!
[Android General] gbl08ma:
I was looking at the mt_cpufreq.c file in the leaked kernel source for the MTK 6589 SoC (the one running at 1.2 GHz), at https://github.com/varunchitre15/MT...atek/platform/mt6589/kernel/core/mt_cpufreq.c

I noticed there were frequency settings above 1209 MHz defined there. The highest one, DVFS_F0_0 goes above 1.7 GHz.

The code that seems to define the maximum frequency starts on line 1573 of that file. It relies on the returned value of PTP_get_ptp_level to define it. Since PTP_get_ptp_level is just a external header on that file, I needed to search the git repo to find its definition. Turns out it is in this file mt_ptp.c. Pay special attention to line 1018 and below: https://github.com/varunchitre15/MT...ek/platform/mt6589/kernel/core/mt_ptp.c#L1018

There's this interesting bit:

#if defined(MTK_FORCE_CPU_89T)
return 3; // 1.5GHz
#else

By returning 3, this function tells the frequency scaling driver that the CPU can go up to a 1.5 GHz clock.

I think I read the 6589T also has a higher GPU clock, and it can handle 2 GB of RAM with no problems. I'm not saying that the difference between the 6589 and the 6589T is just a kernel config, in fact, the chip most likely got a new revision. This source code leaked before there was any talk of a turbo revision of the 6589, so I think it's safe to assume that on newer code trees there may be fixes for the 2 GB of RAM and a higher GPU clock.

But I wonder, if the 6589 (not T) is able to go up to 1.5 GHz or even 1.7 GHz. It would be good if someone could compile that kernel with some modifications to make it think it will be running on a 6589T (adding a #define MTK_FORCE_CPU_89T should be enough) and see if it works fine. Since that source code came from a Acer model, maybe it would be easier to start tests on that device (because we can be sure the source is 100% compatible). I think it may run, but it may heat a lot or it may drive the voltage of the CPU up to a point where the phone's PCB is not prepared to deliver, causing damage (maybe the T revision chip fixes this).
[Android General] guyrandom:
have you done any more digging or testing on this?

Just noticed that Jiayu have released a MTK6589T version of the G3S for only $5 extra - could it be just a simple software unlock?

thanks :)
[Android General] Spekkie88:
My guess is that it really is only a kernel setting considering that the Jiayu G3S comes with both chips within 2 weeks. Besides this is a really easy way for mediatek to sell a wide range of SoC's (just varying the voltages/clockspeeds). The main thing I wonder if this also controls the clockspeed of the GPU, since that clock is different as well, considering the MKT6589 and MKT6589T.
[Android General] cryingrock:
http://www.ini3e.com/thread-2610-1-1.html

This chinese article confirms that the only difference is clock speed.
[Android General] gbl08ma:
It would be really good if someone who can already compile custom kernels for any MT6589 phone, could make that little modification and check the results - worst case scenario, the chip would get too hot and break forever... but since it seems to have a lot of temperature monitoring in place, I don't think that would happen.

I could do it myself, but I'm not going to download 8 GB of Android source, on my limited home connection, just to apply the MT6589 patches available on GitHub, which probably wouldn't work out-of-the-box since they are for a Acer phone and mine's a Zopo 910.

Bothering people at Zopo to do it is out of question, since they are interested in selling the Zopo C2 which comes with this "turbo" kernel config.

As for the GPU clock, on this kernel source there doesn't seem to be anything controlling that based on the MTK_FORCE_CPU_89T define. But this may be just because this is an old source tree - the one they have been distributing for their clients more recently, for the 6589T, may already have the changes for the GPU clock.

The ideal situation would be to have a kernel which can allow all the possible CPU and GPU frequencies, and these would be controlled and limited on the userspace.
[Android General] cartmanotfat:
It would be awesome ! Please devs, do something for us :)
[Android General] kartikoli:
is there anyone working on this
[Android General] OpenMinded:
I looked at it shortly, and noticed a lot of stuff is missing to compile it.

But why not look at it yourself?

Start by git cloning the cm10.1 tree and compile for a device that is supported, to get an idea of how it works.

People who manage to compile the source, please post, because from there we can come close to building CM10.1.
[Android General] gbl08ma:
The sources on that Github are meant to be merged with the JB source tree, you're aware of that when you say it's missing things, right?

Here are sources for another MTK 6589 device:

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=43650399&postcount=10
[Android General] Mbariah:
this group is working on a Cyanogenmod for mtk6589 devices...http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=41345830
[Android General] gowtham121:
http://wikogeek.com/ (Select CINK 5) complete kernel source (800 Mb compressed) with build scripts.
[Android General] Mbariah:
All we now need is someone with a Cink Five to join this forum...Hopefully someone will be willing to test your kernel..

Anyone out there with a Cink Five???
[Android General] gbl08ma:
Apparently the Cink Five is targeted at the French market, so probably one will have better luck asking in a French Android forum.

Any French speakers here?
[Android General] frans0023:
Hi I'm a Wiko cink five user from France. I can give a try but I need stability. If you think it's stable enough, no problem, I can test it.

Thank you for your work !
[Android General] gbl08ma:
To be honest, I think it wouldn't even boot, let alone be stable...

But if you can make a backup of the existing boot.img, then flash my one, and don't mind spending a hour or so without the phone, you could revert to the original boot.img if mine didn't work.

I don't know if Wiko released any updates for the Cink Five or if you have one installed, but that would make it easier to get the current boot.img for backup.
[Android General] frans0023:
No problem for me, send me the file and I will give a try. Just tell me what I have to check, maybe you want the logcat ?

Only boot.img is written when you flash a kernel ?

If it's only that, I could boot on recovery (twrp) and backup the file with "adb pull", then push yours ?

I have to sleep, good night :p

Envoyé depuis mon CINK FIVE avec Tapatalk
[Android General] gbl08ma:
Actually, boot.img is the name of the file on the computer, to be updated with SP Flash tools. I don't know if Wink ever released an update to be flashed this way (but since you have TWRP, probably you have used it).

On the phone (or with recovery), I know a kernel can be flashed with a update.zip.

Right now I don't even know how to create a boot.img file, I only have the zImage. I'm trying to get a way to repack my boot.img so that I can try it on my Zopo...

And then I'll have to solve the problem of the kernel modules (these may be harder to restore since they are in the system partition I think)...

Also:

Is it just me, or the Cink Five is the same as the Fly IQ451? Turns out the zImage I compiled was with the config for the s9201b board, which is the IQ451.

From the pictures of the case, it seems to be the same... but, with Chinese phones, the case means little.

The source tree came configured to use the tinno89_jb config but I changed it because I couldn't compile with it.
[Android General] gowtham121:
Aw yeah, you atleast tried to compile the kernel :) Let's hope the CINK Five guy can test your kernel (P.S: A engineering build please, so that I can access Thermal settings in MTK Tools)
[Android General] gbl08ma:
I think you guys still haven't understood very well that my kernel most likely won't even get to the Android boot logo (I bet it will stop in the early kernel boot stages with some kernel panic).

Furthermore I need a boot.img for the Cink Five so I can put my zImage in there. Otherwise it will never be compatible.

Also, I think the build type is set on the Android building process. I can only build a kernel. I don't have a good enough internet connection to download the Android source, and my computer with 8 GB of RAM lacks the necessary 16 GB (!!!) for compiling.
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] abchtc:
I am currently on CWM 5.5.0.4. I was previously on 5.0.2.7 and with great difficulty and after scouring the forums, I was able to find a way to get 5.5.0.4 installed and running (using this file via odi - ClockworkMod_Recovery_v5.5.0.4_P75xx.tar).

However, in order to get CM10.1 (JB) rom on my p4wifi, I understand I need a 6.x CWM recovery. I have tried to install every possible version 6.x I can find, both in odin and via adb. It installs ok, but when I select it from bootloader, it just freezes at a black screen, so I have to reboot manually.

I have tried a full unroot / factory restore to stock ICS, then tried a fresh install of CWM 6.0.3.3 - but same problem (it installs ok via odin, but whenever I select recovery from bootloader, I get a black screen).

Anyone have any ideas/suggestions on how I can get a 6.x CWM working on my tab....

thanks - Adam
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] eushaun99:
Did you try the one from http://droidbasement.com/db-blog/? Just flash it via Odin and it should work fine. If it doesn't, then try twrp from InfamousAOKP thread.
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] abchtc:
Thanks for input/suggestions. A new 6.0.3.4 CWM became available today on droidbasement - gave it a go, but no good. Installs from odin no problems, but goes to black screen (then reboots) whenever I select recovery from bootloader menu.

Tried TWRP also, and got exactly the same symptoms.

So I guess its 5.5.0.4 and ICS for now on my SGT10.1.....
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] eushaun99:
Then try starting from scratch. Reflash stock ICS, then flash cwm 6.0.3.4. I dunno if it will work, but reflash to stock always fixes problems.
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] abchtc:
Tried a flash of latest US stock ICS (with factory reset), then tried cwm 6.0.3.4 (and twrp) - no good.

Tried a flash of the Hong Kong stock ICS (that's where tablet came from), then cwm 6034 (and twrp) - no good.

Tried a flash of stock Honeycomb, then cwm 6034 - no good.

I can't think of anything else I can try.

My tablet seems to have a few quirks, and is quite particular about the custom recovery it will run. I have also had similar problems with installing custom kernals (I can install A1 Kernal for ICS version 1.59SE ok, but every other newer version of the Kernal I attempt to install will freeze on startup. Yoda's Kernal will also not cooperate).

I seem to have the eMMC brickbug (according to the app), and my bootloader is one of those locked ones (no padlock on startup screen), so not sure if these have anything to do with my issues.

cheers.
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] eushaun99:
Maybe its the way you flash? Try the flashable zip and img versions of twrp. Probably won't work, but heck, just try it. :D

Different note, how do you know if your tab is locked or unlocked? All this while I didn't have to do anything special to my tab to root it.
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] abchtc:
Yeah - I have tried using a zip and also flashing an img version via adb, same problem.

I even had a go at trying to nvflash the 6.x CWM recovery, and that's when I discovered my SGT is apparently 'locked bootloader', because nvflash returns a "0x4" error, which according to forums, means bootloader is locked and you cannot use nvflash.
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] eushaun99:
Hey you didn't told me that you had a 10.1v. There is another forum for it. I think your bootloader may be the problem. See here http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=29501723 and here http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1064793.
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] abchtc:
I don't have the 10.1V - its definitely the GT-P7510 (P4wifi). I found discussion on forums about locked vs unlocked bootloaders for the GT10.1, but it appears the GT10.1 bootloader cannot be unlocked. I can't even be sure that the bootloader is the problem.

I have accepted my tab will not get the opportunity to taste jelly bean, so I'll probably just wait for the Nexus 10 gen 2 to come out later this year. Two years use of my GT10.1 is a good run..
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] eushaun99:
I saw in another thread another guy has the same problem and he said you both have 10.1v. Let's just hope that pershoot sees this and helps you out then.
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] EricGagne:
Adam,

I have the very same problem. I've been fighting with this for a week now and nothing will do, my tab just won't run the latest TWRP or CMW Recovery.

I researched the eMMC Brickbug and it doesn't seem to be related. If I understand it correctly, it just means your tab is susceptible to getting bricked if you try to flash and ICS 4.0.4 rom.

I think there is just something in our hardware that makes it incompatible with recent recoveries.
[Galaxy S III I9305 (4G LTE + 2GB RAM) Q&A, Help & ] DiegoTriches:
i just buy a s3 i9305 and wish know what the best stable custom rom actually in your opinion. Rom that have less bugs. Sorry the english. Thanks
[Galaxy S III I9305 (4G LTE + 2GB RAM) Q&A, Help & ] JJEgan:
79 Posts you should know better .

NO best rom what rom threads allowed .

jje
[Galaxy S III I9305 (4G LTE + 2GB RAM) Q&A, Help & ] Towle:
^^You got it.

Thread closed.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] sakisosf:
Hi guys,today I was trying to compile a kernel for my lww but when I type 'make' it shows some errors.

This my errors

sakis@sakis-desktop:~/android/kernel/kernel$ make

CHK include/linux/version.h

make[1]: `include/asm-arm/mach-types.h' is up to date.

CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h

SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-arm

CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh

CC init/main.o

In file included from include/linux/mempolicy.h:62:0,

from init/main.c:52:

include/linux/pagemap.h: In function 'fault_in_pages_readable':

include/linux/pagemap.h:415:16: error: variable 'c' set but not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]

cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

make[1]: *** [init/main.o] Error 1

make: *** [init] Error 2

sakis@sakis-desktop:~/android/kernel/kernel$

I tried with make -j2 too but nothing
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] mdfzhi:
its not an actual error, its a warning. default kernel Makefile treat warning as dangerous thus force stopping compile process.

cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

just surpress the warning in Makefile, from

KBUILD_CFLAGS := -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs \
-Werror \
-fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common \
-Werror-implicit-function-declaration \
-Wno-format-security \
-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks

to

KBUILD_CFLAGS := -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs \
-Werror \
-fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common \
-Werror-implicit-function-declaration \
-Wno-format-security \
-Wno-unused-but-set-variable \
-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] sakisosf:
Thanks but now I get this:

CHK include/linux/version.h
SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-arm
make[1]: `include/asm-arm/mach-types.h' is up to date.
CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
CC scripts/mod/empty.o
MKELF scripts/mod/elfconfig.h
HOSTCC scripts/mod/file2alias.o
HOSTCC scripts/mod/sumversion.o
HOSTCC scripts/mod/modpost.o
scripts/mod/modpost.c: In function ‘get_markers’:
scripts/mod/modpost.c:1562:12: προειδοποίηση: ignoring return value of ‘asprintf’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
scripts/mod/modpost.c: In function ‘add_marker’:
scripts/mod/modpost.c:1982:10: προειδοποίηση: ignoring return value of ‘asprintf’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
HOSTLD scripts/mod/modpost
CC kernel/bounds.s
GEN include/linux/bounds.h
CC arch/arm/kernel/asm-offsets.s
GEN include/asm/asm-offsets.h
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
CC init/main.o
CHK include/linux/compile.h
CC init/do_mounts.o
CC arch/arm/kernel/compat.o
CC arch/arm/kernel/elf.o
CC init/do_mounts_rd.o
CC init/do_mounts_initrd.o
CC init/do_mounts_md.o
AS arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.o
AS arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.o
CC arch/arm/kernel/irq.o
CC init/initramfs.o
CC init/calibrate.o
CC init/version.o
CC arch/arm/kernel/process.o
LD init/mounts.o
LD init/built-in.o
CC arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.o
CC arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.o
arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c: In function 'dma_free_coherent':
arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c:448:25: error: array subscript is above array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds]
arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c: In function '__dma_alloc':
arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c:260:25: error: array subscript is above array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds]
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/arm/mm] Error 2
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
CC arch/arm/kernel/return_address.o
CC arch/arm/kernel/setup.o
CC arch/arm/kernel/signal.o
CC arch/arm/kernel/sys_arm.o
CC arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.o
CC arch/arm/kernel/time.o
CC arch/arm/kernel/traps.o
CC arch/arm/kernel/armksyms.o
CC arch/arm/kernel/module.o
CC arch/arm/kernel/bios32.o
CC arch/arm/kernel/isa.o
CC arch/arm/kernel/machine_kexec.o
AS arch/arm/kernel/relocate_kernel.o
arch/arm/kernel/relocate_kernel.S: Assembler messages:
arch/arm/kernel/relocate_kernel.S:20: Error: backward ref to unknown label "0:"
arch/arm/kernel/relocate_kernel.S:26: Error: backward ref to unknown label "0:"
arch/arm/kernel/relocate_kernel.S:37: Error: backward ref to unknown label "0:"
arch/arm/kernel/relocate_kernel.S:45: Error: backward ref to unknown label "0:"
make[1]: *** [arch/arm/kernel/relocate_kernel.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make: *** [arch/arm/kernel] Error 2
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] mihahn:
Please use code blocks for terminal output/codes. Type

code

So [code.] and [/code.] and remove the . behind the e;)
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] sakisosf:
Done
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] sakisosf:
Finally I got boot.img but I didnt try yet.The size of the boot.img is 20mb,is it normal?
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Anaximandros:
Im looking for a ROM or maybe a Kernel would work as well?

Either way some sort of software that would give me a reasonably stock android experience, but would also disable the capacitive buttons on the ONE and add android on-screen buttons.

Anyone care to point me in the right direction?
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] API124:
Hello,

Before couple months I removed com.sec.android.app.factorytest. Now I made factory reset. Now I turned on the tablet, it shows configuration screen and it writes, that com.sec.android.app.factorytest crashed, so I can't finish factory reset and because this screen appears averytime I turn on the tablet, I can't use tablet.

Is any way how to access root folder from PC and copy com.sec.android.app.factorytest in the app folder.

If it exists, please can you upload factory test. I will copy it into app folder.

I can use both Windows and Linux OS.

Or is any way, how to cancel factory reset? (I guess not)

Or any another suggestions?
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] eushaun99:
It would be useful to say what ROM are you on. Just reflash that ROM.
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] API124:
Official 3.2. It's not 10.1, but 8.9. It doesn't matter, because it's the same hardware (also same display).

Is it possible to brick device by reflashing?

When I will flash, what if I will flash android 4.0.4? will there be any difference in flashing?
[Galaxy Tab 10.1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] eushaun99:
Just download stock 3.2 or 4.0.4 from www.sammobile.com, boot into download mode, connect to PC and flash via Odin. Given you're rooted, I'm sure you know how to do that.
[Java for Android App Development] tripplemin:
Hi,

I was wondering if I could create a whole android game with animations and everything with and ide such as android studio? Also can games such as candy crush saga it angry birds be made with ide's such as android studio and eclipse?
[Java for Android App Development] nikwen:
Of course, you can. Every app that can be made, can be developed using these IDEs.
[Java for Android App Development] musol:
Yes, for 2D games I use andengine libs and eclipse IDE to develop(you can use android studio) and for 3D games I use jmonkey Engine with the JMonkey IDE(netbeans) but you can use too with the eclipse or android studio.