yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Asus Transformer TF700] FooFighter312:
Everything's working really great and smooth but the menu button does not work :/

Edit: nvm I found the solution, checking 'show action overflow' under buttons in settings fixes the problem :)
[Asus Transformer TF700] amit_sen:
Hey,

Nice to see u got it to build correctly :good:

Not so nice to see no mention/credit of me in helping you at the very beginning to compile pa :rolleyes:

Iam the guy who compiles pa for tf300t ;)
[Asus Transformer TF700] bryce09:
I am sorry I did not mean to forget to put you on the list. I will as soon as I get home

Actually I started from scratch merged from scratch with the 4.3 build :p
[Asus Transformer TF700] bryce09:
Breaking:

Multi window on my tf700 paranoid android build. No cornerstone credits to omnirom team!

This is wip, I just added their latest changes. Bugs expected!

Anyone interested to see what the future will bring us ?

Gesendet von meinem Asus Transformer Infinity mit Tapatalk-4 now Free
[Asus Transformer TF700] mikew29:
Please share! Multiwindow would rock
[Asus Transformer TF700] yew123:
+1
[Asus Transformer TF700] isualk:
+1
[Asus Transformer TF700] bryce09:
Remember this is wip by OmniRom team.

I dont know if I will support this feature, lets see how useful it is.

To put a window into window mode go to recents and long click on any window, then add to split view.

Windows are being reloaded in split view when started from launcher. (I did not choose this feature)

I have to add that I am really positive about their implementation in comparison to cornerstone. It is really clean and pretty adaptable and configurable at source code level :P. Good stuff is gonna happen with this :)

Happy testing

Rom PA Multiwindow wip
[Asus Transformer TF700] lnx4tw:
I find that I am getting better results with your other r_62 kernel. Is there really a difference in the kernels, or is it just my imagination?

EDIT: I reinstalled the default kernel (by dirty flashing the ROM) and did a usability test of some apps (ie Gmail, browser, Netflix). Afterwards, I installed the r_62 kernel and did the same test with those apps. I am finding that the r_62 kernel provides a much more fluid experience with this rom. After letting the kernel settle, it provides decent battery life with the experience I expect from a tablet like this.
[Asus Transformer TF700] GigaSPX:
Hi I flashed your new WIP ROM that incorporated multiwindow and I'm loving it. I'd just like to report how I think the tablet may restart itself if it goes to sleep with the multiwindow apps on. I'm not sure if it's because of this or something else, but when my tablet sent to sleep with it, it just any like that.

Also how do I turn off screen rotation? I don't see it in quick settings or in the Display settings. Help please? Thanks!
[Asus Transformer TF700] xcom923:
can someone do me a favor and enable the overflow menu under "buttons" and give me a copy of the build prop?
[Asus Transformer TF700] PaintballerAlex07:
Looks like this thread is dead. Any updates planned?
[Asus Transformer TF700] nvan7891:
This thing heen dead since last october. Theres a newer PAC rom, though.
[HTC One X+] shah123:
Right now I am in big trouble. I was trying to automate my phone so that it would turn off my PIN when I am at home and connected to home wifi network using Tasker and Secure Settings, and vise-versa (when I am not home, enable it). But it was not working. In other words, it would detect that I am at home and it would activate the Profile, but it won't be able to disable the PIN. It continued to ask for the PIN.

So in order to make sure that it is taking some action at all after detecting when I am not at home (to test it at work, I changed the "when I am not at home" profile), out of my infinite wisdom, I changed it to actually enable password instead of PIN to see if it asks for the password instead of PIN. That way I would know if the app is able to make any security changes at all.

Sure enough it looked like it has made the password enabled instead of the PIN now. However the keyboard that I get has only the numeric characters, no alphabet. How on earth am I supposed to enter the alpha-numeric password????

I don't know which app messed it up. Is it the Tasker? Is it the Secure Settings plugin? Or is it the SwiftKey keyboard app that is stupid enough to not change from numeric to alpha-numeric.

I have never setup a Password before, only the PIN. I don't even know how the keyboard looks like when you setup the password instead of PIN. I am sure it is supposed to show the alpha-numeric keyboard. But it is NOT.

Please help.

Thanks.
[HTC One X+] shah123:
The issue is resolved. Just for someone else running into this issue, this is what happened. I accidentally ended up in pressing the Emergency Call button and it popped up the dialer. Of course I exit out of it, but now the keyboard I got was the correct keyboard - alpha-numeric, and I was able to enter the password.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] Boylsie:
Hi,

I've tried motochopper, didnt work. I downloaded the sparkyroot and it says it cant find the exploit. I dont know what to do.

I'm on 4.1.1 JB and I really want to root my brand new prime :L

Thanks for the help

EDIT: Motochopper worked this time and i now have superuser access. How would i now go about unlocking the bootloader to install custom roms?
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] sbdags:
Download the unlock tool from the Asus website.
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] QAN:
With PC2002, WM2003 and WM2003SE I had always the COM5 and COM6 ports for bleutooth. Now within WM2005 there is no longer the COM5 port. This port is nessesary when you want to connect to another device with bleutooth. In both version of WM2005 on this forum COM5 is gone. Does anyone know if this is a bug? Can we get it back or do we need to connect to a bleutooth device in another way?
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] patrick_dube:
That's what I did to solve my missing bluetooth port.

settings

Connections

Bluetooth

COM Ports

New Outgoing Port and follor the instructions.

I haven't been able to use The GPS settings in the System Tab... I have not tested fully to be sure that I can't though.
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] QAN:
I have paired my BT GPS and checked the box to use a serial port. But which port is used? I looked into the registry and I cannot find anything. Normaly it should use COM5. But this one is no longer available on the device. I think whe should try to copy the registry setting of WM2003SE to WM2005 for the COM5 port.

The new GPS tool should do something like GPSgate. When you select COM0 on the first tab, marks that this port is used. GPSgate tell me that COM0 is not available. When I remove COM0 and select none, the COM0 port is again available for GPSgate. The problem is that COM0 is not defined as a COM port. You cannot select it. This makes the new tool unusable at the moment.

On tab 2 you have to select the COM port of the GPS. Strangely all the COM ports are available. Also COM5. What does that mean.

I have alse defined on the new third tab of the MS bleutooth settings that the outgoing BT trafic should use COM5 for my BT GPS. Nothing works. Does anyone know how to use the new functionality?
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] Gadzooks112358:
Is it possible to change the settings app to a AOSP theme without root? I have my phone nearly to stock (at least with the way it looks, using the Google keyboard, HoloLauncher, HoloLocker, the stock Gallery apk, and the stock Camera apk from 4.3) and don't like the TouchWiz settings. I do not want to root because last time I did it gave me a yellow triangle and wouldn't do anything and had to exchange it. (luckily, the store is unincorporated and did not charge me $700 for a return of a rooted phone) I would prefer not root again if I can help it, and am wondering if I could swap out the default settings app, or maybe get some better instructions on how to root. I am no stranger as I have rooted a Kindle Fire, a Nexus S, and this phone. I am just scared Verizon will pull the yellow screen on me again and need to know how to get around it
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] Gadzooks112358:
Also, i do know how to change settings on my phone. Sorry if the title is a bit misleading
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] AldenIsRad:
Dude, you must have flashed a custom rom while not unlocked to get the yellow triangle. Just use Casual Exploit for VRAMC3 by Adam Outler. If you get errors, it doesn't brick your phone. Anyways, assuming you want to edit or replace the stock settings, its replacing a system app or editing a system app which requires root and an unlocked bootloader.

Here is the link to Casual. Just be completely stock on Android 4.1.2 with baseband and build ending in VRAMC3 and you should be good to go.

Link to Adam Outler's Casual:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2272066

Just download casual, turn on developer options on your phone with USB Debugging checked on. Plug in the phone to the computer. When it says Device Connected, just press "Do it" and your good to go. Let Casual run its thing. If an error occurs, don't worry, your phone should reboot normally back into your lockscreen.

Hope I helped. Press "Thanks" if I helped you. I don't neccesarily know how to do what you requested in your thread as I haven't touched my settings yet but changing the dpi in it. But, googling it should do the trick. :)
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] Gadzooks112358:
Well I did use the Exynos Exploit to root without needing a computer. I'm not sure if that changed anything. Thanks for the link :) I'll probably just get a custom ROM and change everything to 'Stock'. Idk how to thank someone as I am very new to xda, though...... I would if I knew how (hint hint)
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] AldenIsRad:
I see... You rooted but did not unlock your bootloader which caused your soft brick before. Just follow my link and it should root and unlock your bootloader and then you can get flashing.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] Gadzooks112358:
Thanks guys. I thought it also unlocked my bad :-/ but I am now fully rooted and am running CM 10.1 :)
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] 17mayis:
hi every one i have a a weird problem been using galaxy note stuck rom for 1 year, from last 1 week i wanted to try a costume rom and i installed 2-3 differents roms all went fine no problem during installation. The only problem i have is when i connect to my pc to transfer files to either internal/external the files start sending with 3mbites transfer rates for example then drops to 300k then to 0k then goes back to 1mbiets then drops again to 0 while this happens the phone get freez and only way to hold power button to reset it

i just flashed back to stock rom and it just works fine there only this problem happens when im on costume roms
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] SpyderTracks:
Mtp connection is notoriously dodgy in my experience on cm based roms and aokp. I think there are some threads with fixes or workarounds but haven't really read them.
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kennethsime:
Hi all,

Just ordered a new Nexus 4 and am looking for case recommendations. It comes with the stock bumper free, but I want something more I think.

My previous phone was an HTC Inspire 4G (RIP) and I really liked the CaseMate Toughcase for it, which was pretty similar to the Otterbox Commuter cases (hard plastic outer shell, soft silicone inner padding), especially combined with a screen protector.

While I'm not the clumsiest person in the world, I have dropped before, and will continue to drop, on surfaces ranging from dirt to concrete to hardwood. I'm wondering what the best solution for protecting the glass surfaces on my new phone will be, without going for the extreme of the bombproof OtterBox Defender-type cases. I think my ideal would be along the lines of the Otterbox Commuter, along with a good screen protector.

So, recommendations?

Edit: Can anyone comment on the Ionic Guardian Armor Case or the KaysCase ArmorBox Cover Case? Specifically as it relates to protection and ease of use/taking in and out of pockets?
[General Topics] lox2013:
You may remember that last year, the DMCA exemption on unlocking phones was smacked down. Well it's going into effect this Saturday. So starting tomorrow, unlocking your phone will be officially illegal. Yay.

Unlocking phones without the express consent of the carrier who locked them became illegal thanks to edits to DMCA exemptions back in October, but it's only now that the 90-day grace period is running out. Locked phones purchased in the 90 days after the ruling are still game to be unlocked, but from here on out, for an unlocked phone to be legitimate, it'll have to have been bought that way or come with a permission slip from your carrier.

It's not the first time retracted DMCA exemptions have threatened to mess with your ability to mess with your phone. Jailbreaking and rooting almost became illegal again because of DMCA exemption changes. Fortunately, the same batch of modifications that illegalized unlocking will also protect phone jailbreaking for another three years. But it's still not allowed on tablets. Not than anyone is likely notice that particular indiscretion.

These changes won't, of course, limit you ability to unlock phones anyway, but it will give carriers a bit of a heavier stick to wave at you if they catch you using an unlocked phone they didn't authorize; they can tell. There are also a few technical loopholes. Legacy phones, i.e. "used (or perhaps unused) phones previously purchased or otherwise acquired by a consumer" are still cool to unlock, and that definition has a little bit of play in it. But the practice of unlocking your carrier-discounted phone is still going to be a crime, so get ready to deal with this brave new world, or live the life of an outlaw.
[General Topics] angus454:
Illegal... you know I'm not really going to lose any sleep over this outside of the potential damage to sites and communities like xda. If the carriers do anything more than dole out some sort of fine I'll be surprised. Eventually some carrier will release all their phones like asus did with the tf300t tablet: register,unlock and no problem but your warranty is voided. I think this approach makes sense. I will be interested to see how xda handles the pressure from carriers or manufacturers to limit or remove access to the knowledge of this community.
[General Topics] wolfen69:
T-Mobile will accept any unlocked phone. Plus, I can always buy chinese clones that come unlocked. No big deal.
[General Topics] amemes:
Maybe in the US, but in Europe it's not illegal.
[General Topics] magik300:
I've always wanted to live in US - a country of freedom.
[General Topics] daluke:
Is the unlock illegal only if the equipment in question is under contract?
[General Topics] bbrad:
If your not in the us why post? Nobody cares about how your EU allows phone unlocking now then let the us people do the talking.
[General Topics] P1NK13P13:
Majority of Sprint phones, like mine, come unlocked lol :p
[General Topics] gc84245:
Yay! Just because I paid full price for something doesn't mean I expect to own it or do what I want with it. I am happy to give my carrier hundreds of dollars for something that they have control over.

Seriously though, I refuse to buy a locked phone out of principle. I wish others would do the same.
[General Topics] dubluv1:
:good:
[General Topics] ASMI1:
I am from Tunisia:laugh:
[General Topics] theregkid:
I believe his comment was sarcastic...

I am wondering this as well.
[General Topics] 93fuelslut:
O no my phones illegal ! So is my girlfriend ;)

sent from your moms phone
[General Topics] ccxxx:
Didn't this unlocking refer to unlocking in the sense that you can use it with sim cards from any carrier and not the "unlocking" that means installing your own operating system or getting root privilegues?
[General Topics] Nerviozzo:
There is no any restriction here in Chile, i expect that doesn't change.
[General Topics] ruthlessptizzle:
Yes that's only for the carrier not just unlocking ur phine
[General Topics] daluke:
Haha
[General Topics] jesusprice:
It's also illegal to Jay walk and take the tag off your mattress... so this changes nothing
[General Topics] vikraminside:
Let XDA be governing regulating authority like DMCA. Then standards will be set by xda for dev community. XDA has the potential in my opinion.

Without research world cannot be healed.
[General Topics] bbrad:
What lol. Xda is Dev forum nothing else.
[General Topics] vikraminside:
Why not? Its not just another forum. One cannot learn swimming unless he/she touches waters.

Tomorrow dmca says share your credit card details to that sweet phishing app and oblige. We still play noobs?

This is for dev by dev. Did you or me elect DMCA? :)

Till yesterday one rule today one rule why? So yesterday it was fine today it became crime? The framework should be strong enough to withstand changes.

My point is "we should define standards" for us. I would like to remind our age old definition "internet is not owned by anyone".
[General Topics] bbrad:
I agree we as people can stand up also a lot of people know how to swim without touching water :rolleyes: its not that hard. But again xda is just a forum not a presidency. Stop over thinking this. Nobody is gonna stop unlocking anyway.
[General Topics] vikraminside:
There you are. Agreed. :thumbup: Yea lets continue bricking our phones lols
[General Topics] ccxxx:
Or you could just stop buying carrier locked phones. Vote with your wallet and stuff.
[General Topics] DreadApex:
agreed. best to spend your money elsewhere, when they start losing money, they'll rethink their stance.

This may very-well be the straw that finally breaks that enduring camels back.
[General Topics] worf105:
Hear hear, Well said DreadApex :good:
[General Topics] MekQanik:
"Fuk em, an their (U.S.Corp) Law"
[General Topics] FeintDoxx:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2387612

sent from the lone wolf next door with a Nexus 4 using XDA Premium.
[General Topics] MekQanik:
ha ha, they might not get their corporate way after all. :cowboy:
[General Topics] F2504x4:
This should be posted here as well.

NEWS: Bill to Legalize Phone Unlocking Clears Committee !!!	House Judiciary Committee Approves Cell Phone Unlocking Bill

Washington, D.C. – The House Judiciary Committee today approved the bipartisan Unlocking Consumer Choice and Wireless Competition Act (H.R. 1123), legislation that restores the exemption that permits consumers to unlock their cell phones without the approval of their wireless provider. The Unlocking Consumer Choice and Wireless Competition Act, which passed by voice vote, also allows third parties to assist consumers, when necessary, in unlocking their cell phones further ensuring that all consumers have the ability to unlock their cell phone.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), chief sponsor of the Unlocking Consumer Choice and Wireless Competition Act, and Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet Subcommittee Chairman Howard Coble (R-N.C.) praised today’s Committee vote.

Chairman Goodlatte: “The bipartisan Unlocking Consumer Choice and Wireless Competition Act protects consumer choice by allowing consumers flexibility when it comes to choosing a wireless carrier. This is something that Americans have been asking for and it is imperative that Congress act to restore the exemption that allowed consumers to unlock their cell phones. I am pleased the Committee has approved this important legislation and look forward to a House vote on this bill soon.”

Subcommittee Chairman Coble: “We all live with our phones 24/7, so it is important for consumers to have the flexibility to pick the service plans that work for them.”

For official documentation/press release:

http://judiciary.house.gov/news/2013/07312013.html
[General Topics] mp0890:
I do the same, but it gets very expensive, especially considering subsidies.
[General Topics] gc84245:
Actually it's cheaper for me, because I can choose a cheaper carrier. I save maybe $30/month over 36 months which ends up being a lot more than the subsidy.
[General Topics] axel6630:
With my smartphone I do what I want
[General Topics] ShadowLea:
Yay for the EU... ;)

We have a law that makes it legal since oh...1994...
[General Topics] OneBlueSky:
Eh, not worried. They're welcome to come try to do something if they like. When the phones become free or they pay for it all, THEN they can have a say what I do with them.
[General Topics] olorolo:
Free in words only my friend

from a D3rped out m7
[General Topics] ShadowLea:
Not if the NSA has anything to say about it...
[General Topics] Nishchhal:
Hahaha made me laugh ;)
[General Topics] iArePJ:
xD that's only if they find us
[General Topics] jimmycalhoun:
Don't worry

Some congressmen still have our back: judiciary.house.gov/news/2013/07312013.html
[General Topics] rex28818:
Who cares if its illegal or what so ever...:cool::cool:
[General Topics] 93fuelslut:
So is my jar of moonshine . Which is why it taste even better ;)

sent from your moms phone
[General Topics] aka420:
OMG unlocking is unofficial....
[General Topics] WindMeUp:
Unlocking

Seems like some of the carriers don't really mind providing unlock codes. I used the online chat with AT&T and had my unlock code in 5 minutes. The phone is only a month old and still under subsidy, but I guess they figure there's no risk in providing the code since I'd still have to pay the ETF anyway?
[General Topics] ltc_mkt:
Is rooting illegal in India ?

i want to know whether rooting is illegal in India or not ?

Without root, my minde not consider 'my cell is mine' :(
[General Topics] AllanSim:
Well said!
[General Topics] vanessaem:
Devices can always be relocked so I wouldn't worry or care. ;)
[General Topics] drewwtek:
I think that rooting is fine. Laws would only prevent actual "unlocking" which translates to "unlocking the carrier lock". This doesn't apply to unlocking a device so it can do whole lot more than it was sold to do. ;)
[General Topics] SonicX2014:
I asked Virgin Mobile their thoughts on people that root their androids to remove bloat ware and to upgrade to better OS's and to my surprise I was told it's extremely harmful to cell phone towers and other things. :eek:

This was coming from a tech. Then tech support goes on to tell me how rooting violates Virgin Mobiles polices because it's hacking and being able to gain access to features only tech's and repair personal is only allowed. WHAT?

I almost wanted to laugh at this point. So I asked what if you find out or someone just plain out says YES,

I have a rooted phone and I bought it on eBay that way. The tech on the other end said then Virgin Mobile can and will close down your account and ban it permanently. :confused:

O.k. first off I don't buy into this tech's voodoo bull crap. Second, I bought my phone outright in full and if I didn't root and flash a better ROM, my android would be still using Froyo 2.2.1 which always locked up, glitched, freezing up 3 times a day, spying on me, random boots for no reason, and the no service bug that drains my battery because it doesn't know when to quit looking for a signal that's not there. This was my last statement to the tech at Virgin Mobile just before he dropped the line on me.

Well sir, if you would start updating the ROM's to the latest and greatest, and stop locking the ability to remove crap ware / bloatware, then maybe no one would have to root. (CLICK) That's right, I heard CLICK. guess he had enough of me. :good: :laugh:

My opinion, Cell phone providers, shut the hell up and leave us alone. Rooting is a good thing. Unlocking is a good thing too. If these cell phone providers had any sense, they would be bowing to these Dev's here that go out of their way to improve our phones that are too old. And it helps the manufactures too if you think about it because ROMs get faster bug fixes too.:laugh:
[General Topics] anilyarki:
:D as if we care.
[General Topics] Columbo4Life:
illegal my a$$
[General Topics] merlise:
Here I go, living on the edge with my unlocked phone.