yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S 4] kevinrubio1:
My settings are :

MIN/MAX : 189 Mhz and 1890 Mhz

Screen Off Profile Mhz: 486 Mhz

Disable Screen Off Mhz Call: Enabled

Screen Off Profile Sched: noop

Screen Off GPU Max Mhz: 200

Which one's do i increase? and 384 isn't an option for me, it's either 378 or 189 (those are the lowest)
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S 4] stevessvt:
Change your min/max to 384(378?)/1890 and your screen off to 5XX, dont remember what that number is...
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S 4] Skipjacks:
I meant 378.

But looking at your settings, first change the 486 max screen off to "No Change". Having that limiter on there could easily be what's causing your problem because the phoen is suddenly trying to perform 3 tasks at once. It's trying to notify you of the incoming call, turn the screen on, and change its' max processor speed to 1890. The change in processor speed is coming from the Kernel app, which has the lowest priority over the other 2 processes. So it's trying to turn the screen on and notify you of the incoming call while it's stuck at 486 Mhz. Only after it handles those tasks is the speed limit raised.

If you didn't have that speed limit then the phone would work at 1890 Mhz to turn the screen on and notify you of the call, and it would take about a half a second to complete.

I promise you it doesn't make much of a difference in battery if the screen off CPU speed is limited. If something runs with the screen off at 486 it just takes longer than it does at 1890. So the CPU is still going to run.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S 4] kevinrubio1:
Okay I increased it to 378 Mhz and my screen off to 594 Mhz! I'll leave my phone to the side for a couple of minutes and see if it has the delay or not!
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S 4] kevinrubio1:
Thanks, that makes perfect sense! I just set it to " Selected Scaling Max" because I couldn't find "No change" , is that the same?
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S 4] Skipjacks:
Yes. Same thing.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S 4] kevinrubio1:
It worked! Thanks skip
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S 4] elesbb:
Great info! But partly incorrect.

Ktweaker is not like your other CPU tweaking apps. The app is not doing the screen on change. The kernel itself is doing that. If you look at the last_kmsg you will see the lines outputting the change. It also contains no screen on receiver which is needed for listening for screen events. :) Ktoonsez has kernel powers, they are better than APIs :) But yes, the max screen off CPU will cause lag when receiving a phone call for the reasons you state. It needs power to do its processes but is limited to the max CPU setting until the screen awakes.

But also increasing the min CPU levels helps too. I also think depending on which governor is used, that only one CPU is allowed to go on when the screen is off. Which is a great battery saver.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S 4] kevinrubio1:
wait so if I set the screen off mhz to 702, I would be fine and I would be saving battery?
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S 4] elesbb:
Yes you would save battery. And that should be high enough to let the processes carry out.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S 4] shoosh1234:
where is the screen setting menu??

i have the same problem how do i find the setting?
[Galaxy S II Themes and Apps] remuntada78:
Hi to all, i've a little problem, i took the mod InkEffect for the ParsLand-jb-9100-xxlsj rom, now in the lockscreen appear a °F

i show you

View attachment 2118791

i want replace the original Swipe screen to unlock , which files should I look for to mod?

I know that to change it i have to go in framework-res.apk, but the zip mod does not contain the framework-res.apk so why?

thanks in advance
[Galaxy S II Themes and Apps] Christian Nothing:
mate i suggest to try this ink effect mod first cuz is made for newer jb version

http://www.4shared.com/zip/ctipODcN/S2_InkEffect_custom_color_XWLS.html
[Galaxy S II Themes and Apps] remuntada78:
thanks i've already tried it but i prefer the note2 version, so there's nothing to do?
[Galaxy S II Themes and Apps] Christian Nothing:
you could disable from settings the lockscreen text .

go to settings > lock screen > lockscreen option > uncheck the "show text on lockscreen" or something like ;)
[Galaxy S II Themes and Apps] remuntada78:
yes i know this,but I would like to change it internally

another little issue when i flashed the mod is the appear this

View attachment 2118944

is the notification led pulse , how can i remove it?
[Galaxy S II Themes and Apps] Christian Nothing:
on which rom are you ?
[Galaxy S II Themes and Apps] remuntada78:
i'm on xwlsd odex ,but i'm usig this tool http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=43130585#post43130585 to re-odex and it work 've already do multiwindows ,extended-menu and other for xwlsd odex
[Galaxy S II Themes and Apps] Christian Nothing:
i dunno mate what to say :(

i suggest you to download a custom rom based on xwlsd and extract the secsettings and framework-res from and flash on your phone and see if the problems are gone :o
[Galaxy S II Themes and Apps] remuntada78:
ok thanks a lot
[Galaxy S II Themes and Apps] Christian Nothing:
hey mate i figure out something :

you can try my modded frameworks + settings and see if it'll gonna fix your problem :)

my framework you can download from here http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=43518996&postcount=65476

and the settings from here http://d-h.st/LPK

but you need to delete the .odex files for the respective apks
[Galaxy S II Themes and Apps] remuntada78:
thanks again i will try
[Galaxy S II Themes and Apps] maskerwsk:
To replace the text decompile framework-res go to res/values/strings search for 'of' or whatever is currently showing and replace with what you want. Decompile....done

Edit - nevermid i reread the post and you said there is no framework lol
[Galaxy S II Themes and Apps] Omar1c:
Hmm will this work with wanam lite?
[Galaxy S II Themes and Apps] Christian Nothing:
yes if the wanamlite rom doesn't have the ink effect activated ;)
[Galaxy S II Themes and Apps] SXUsr:
Any text like this will be in the strings.xml.

...Sent from Zed
[Galaxy S II Themes and Apps] remuntada78:
I solved it by doing me the mod ink effect following this guide http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2034565 and everything is back to normal
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Red_81:
Yes I know it's a long shot. But since the White House is getting more technologically advanced these days I figured it was worth a shot. Here is a petition to make it illegal for the carriers to control the software on a device you own.

http://wh.gov/layx4
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Thermalwolf:
I totally agree with this, but the problem is when you buy the device on contract, you don't technically own it until the end of the two years since you're paying it off during those two years.

But if you buy the device out right off contract I think they should have some form of removal.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Red_81:
I know. I phrased it as consumer owned devices so those who bought the device out right or payed their ETF would qualify. Those still under contract are at the mercy of the carrier. I figure once the contract obligations are met they can unlock the bootloader for the customer similar to unlocking it for use on other networks.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Thermalwolf:
Well I'll sign it either way but this would be a massive legal undertaking :P
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Red_81:
Oh yeah. But since the courts ruled jail breaking was legal this would seem like a common sense extension. Maybe some legal firm wants to make a name for themselves and will take up the cause.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Red_81:
I also think of it this way. Imagine if Ford told you that you could only put Ford approved tires on your vehicle even though it was paid off and you held the title.

Then they claimed it was to keep other Ford drivers safe. However, if you bought the the same Ford in Canada then you could put whatever tires you wanted on it. Doesn't make much sense does it?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] dligon:
I'm starting a petition to stop other petitions from being petitioned especially ones that have been tried before with the same results.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Mike:
There is 0 chance you get the 100,000 signatures you need in 1 month. It was a nice try, but it simply won't happen

Sent from my AT&T Galaxy S4 Running AOKP 4.2.2
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Marvelicious75:
I don't know, I kinda liked the one where Texas petitioned to secede. I signed it, but then again, I'm not from Texas...

As to the OP, best of luck, but I don't think 'long shot' even begins to describe it.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Red_81:
Yes. It will fail. People will take 30 seconds to come here and whine and b@#ch about it but won't take the same amount of time to sign it. Apathy at its finest.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Duffmantp:
I think its just a majority don't want to "Register" anything with the government.

Most of the people on these type of forums and similar forums are hackers/moders (good and/or bad doesnt matter)

They just wont simply register an account with the government to sign the petition.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] AxAtAx:
Bingo...my thought exactly.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] polish_pat:
Guys, this doesn't make any sense. Don't get me wrong, i feel your pain, but you have to understand the fundamentals of business before you start asking a restructuring. When you buy a phone on contract, you are SUBSIDIZING a phone. By definition, a subsidy is: "A sum of money granted by the government or a public body to assist an industry or business so that the price of a commodity or service may remain low or competitive" In this case, its not the government but a corporation, that is funding you so you can purchase a commodity or service. You are taking a good, using a service, subsidized, and have to oblige to their guidelines. It's like if you asked a movie company that sells DVDs to remove copy protection, or a car manufacturer to not lock the car at 230km/h.

As long are you are being subsidized by your carrier, you have to follow their rules. In a carriers head, having an unlock bootloader mean user can fiddle with their phone, use them above their OEM specs, and potentially break them. How many people have bricked, or even fried their phone because of a failed flash or bad OC? A lot, and that in terms mean A LOT more $$$$ for the carriers to replace your phone, because we can all agree if you bring them a phone that is not water damaged, or physically damaged, they will almost certainly just swap it for a refurb one and they will deal with that later.

It sucks, but its not only their right, it's also understandable. If users took a little more precaution when playing around with roms, maybe this would not be the case. So until then, buy unlocked
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] RedIronCrown:
This is not true at all. A subsidized phone still belongs to the customer.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] CAG-man:
Thank you polish_pat for explaining that. I don't know how many times I've tried to explain that to someone.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] polish_pat:
it does, but that doesn't mean you can do what you want with it. It's yours, but with "strings attached"
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] crispyham93:
I really wish something like this works one day.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] RedIronCrown:
Actually, you can do what you want with it. You can sell or modify it as you see fit with no more consequence than if you had bought the phone outright without a contract. There is literally nothing you can do with a purchased phone that you cannot with a subsidized phone.

The subsidy is to get you to sign a service contract, which obligates you to pay for their service for whatever the contract term is. Nothing to do with the hardware.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Red_81:
Which is why I phrased it as a consumer owned device. If gives the carrier an out while you are paying off the subsidy. However, once you paid off the device, At&t should have no say in what goes on the device. Providing an unlocked bootloader at that point would be what we would be looking for.

Remember at one time Jail breaking was considered illegal, but the courts ruled in favor of he consumer.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] krips2003:
Yes you can sell the phone, but you are still locked into 2 year plan. It's not like after selling the phone you can get an upgrade on the same line right away with discounted price. AT&T doesn't care what you do with your phone as long as you are not eligible for an upgrade on discounted price. You can sell it and don't use the phone, still you need to pay them the monthly bill until your contract is over. People who paid full amount without any contracts from AT&T, they have full right to make the petition about this issue.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Slade8525:
the device can be owned by the user technically isnt until its paid off or the contract has been fulfilled (hence its subsidized), the software is licensed for USE only, not modification.

exactly; technically you sign a contract with the expressed and/or implied reasoning that you will not modify the software or you void your warranty.

this is precisely why you should buy unlocked if this concerns you. I fully support development independent of carriers, but there is also a LOT of warranty fraud going on (eg people returning phones they have hard bricked, flashed the wrong kernel/ROM on, etc) so it is a legitimate concern on their end as well. Once you root, you void your warranty. im surprised there is not a way for this to 'phone home' to the carrier or manufacturer and blacklist the serial number of the device.

basically, if you are going to root/flash, you should be financially capable and technically capable of any repair or replacement costs associated with permanently disabling or damaging your device, not 'returning to stock for warranty'; that is fraud.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] polish_pat:
that doesn't change the fact that when you buy from a carrier, you oblige to their rules. Don't know if you've ever purchased a laptop from bestbuy, but i did and it was the worst mistake ever. I bought an asus gaming rig, by default, asus gives its customer a 2 years warranty, with a one year accidental damage, bestbuy breaks that and just give the basic one year and oblige you to pay for the second.

The topic here is not what you can or cannot do with a subsidized vs unsubsidized phone, its about the carrier locking the bootloader and having that changed. If you dont like it, you have 2 options, dont buy from a carrier, or move to canada. Because as you can see, canada doesnt have any such restrictions
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] hapticxchaos:
what about for the people who DONT buy subsidized? shouldnt they be allowed to unlock and flash? its not unheard of for a customer to walk in, gladly pay the 500-700$ for a phone to avoid the contract...shouldnt the carriers offer an option for them? why should we HAVE to buy specific phones for that, yo?

all in all i do see the logic. i just think instead of locking us in, there should be an obvious option to willingly void your warranty and do with what you please.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Slade8525:
thats what Dev/GE editions are for; unlocked bootloader, unsubsidized, off-contract.

there is really no point to this thread, should be locked up.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] RedIronCrown:
No, technically the consumer bought the phone for the subsidized price and now owns it, full stop. The contractual obligation that they agreed to is not tied to the hardware that the consumer bought. There is not even a lien against the phone like there is on a house with a mortgage or a car with a loan (and even in those cases, the consumer still technically owns the house or car).

The contract has nothing to do with the warranty. Anything that will void the warranty of a subsidized phone will do the same for a no-contract phone.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Slade8525:
correct. In car terms, there is the Magnuson-Moss act to protect users from warranty denial for modifying their cars, EG a manufacturer cannot deny full warranty coverage because modifications to stock hardware have been made without proving beyond reasonable doubt the modification caused the damage. There is no such act/rights for phones; hardware and software are treated differently; one is owned, one is licensed. The solution is to buy the google play edition, period. This cleanly circumvents warranty fraud some users try, gives the user an unlocked bootloader, SIM unlocked, a bit more storage space, and keeps everyone out of the gray areas.

i am not familiar with loans liens or mortgages personally, but i do understand legal frameworks and licensee/licensor rights quite well. there is no legal wiggle room. The only thing that will send a clear message to service providers, manufacturers, and software publishers that users want these options is to support and buy the non-subsidized, fully unlocked models. Devs/hackers/modders are a minority, no petition is going to cause change. Heck, we dont even have a single lobbyist or congressperson backing it. In fact, SIM unlocking recently became illegal unless you fulfill certain requirements, and then it is up to the carrier to decide if they will unlock it, so i would say the legal framework and momentum is in fact against us already.

To top it off, the petition is short, vague, and very poorly written. There are no citations made or properly refuted, the wording is well outside normal legal frameworks, and it in no way attempts to clarify or quantify the differences between hardware ownership and software licensing, which is the real underlying issue.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] RedIronCrown:
I don't know, I think there's a sizable portion of the market that is well-served by subsidized phones. There must be large numbers of people who couldn't afford a $650+ phone outright, but can afford a subsidized one with a service contract, especially as they will be paying for service one way or the other anyway. And for many consumers an unlocked bootloader is an obscure feature that they will never use.

That said, there's no technical reason a subsidized phone needs to be locked down. They have what they want from you once you've signed the contract.

Perhaps they're deliberately trying to drive away modders. I can think of a few threads in recent memory where a user messed up their phone when trying to flash a ROM, and returned it for exchange at the point of sale (sometimes multiple times). This is the real reason carriers want the phones locked down, as it reduces exchange and support costs.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] polish_pat:
When you buy through carrier, the carrier honors the warranty, when you buy through OEM, or OEM dealer, its OEM warranty. There are many accounts of people that got their return refused by carrier because the flashcounter was tripped. I have myself returned an unlocked phone bought on a website to Samsung with a screen problem and it was rooted and had custom rom on it and they never gave me a hard time. OEM and Carriers have their own rules and regulations, technically, they should be similar, but they can do what they please at the end of the day.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Slade8525:
the vast majority of people opt for subsidized phones, and it 'hides' the high cost of the device with an even higher premium and long contract. I have bought several off contract, and several international/unlocked phones in the past, including a watchphone (Hyundai W100 back in maybe '08) and used them with AT&T, T-mobile, Bell, Rogers, whatever.

They arent trying to push modders away, just fraudsters. Modders should opt for the GE versions, and the GE versions SHOULD have come out simultaneously; that would have saved them a lot of headaches, but lost AT&T revenue in the end.

The warranty was with OEM if bought in the USA, not carrier, or with retailer for xx days, if bought internationally. Carrier only supports their supplied device AND with only their supplied/included/official software. People that mod, brick/damage and return are comitting fraud.

right on, a lot has to do with warranty liability and fraud.

At this point, since the GE versions came out, i suggest anyone wanting to mod their phone buy one of those; it promotes future updates, newer GE editions of next-gen phones, and easier development for mods; all around win.

On the other hand, i have helped a few people in person or via skype to root/recovery/flash custom ROMs so that they DONT brick their phone, and teach them how to freeze updates/backup, return to stock, etc, but i stress that they did void the warranty and not to commit fraud. Or i'll do it for people that would/could/should benefit from custom ROM stuff like themes or utilities, quicker UI, more storage space/reduced bloatware etc.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Red_81:
Sorry. The petitions only have an 800 character limit. It doesn't give much room for long winded legal explanations with citations.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] wingzero1:
Would like the choice....

All in all - I would like carriers and manufacturers to support unlocking boot loaders - heck they could make a business - "you want your new phone unlocked - sure - that's $20's please and oh your warranty is void" - they could control the market if they chose to. Let the consumer decide. They provide a service - what's one more?:rolleyes:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Kyuta Syuko:
Sadly I might pay an additional $10-$20 to the carrier as a service charge if they unlocked the bootloaders and I wouldn't care if my warranty was void since I pretty much void my warranty as soon as I touch it...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] polish_pat:
please learn to make the distinction between carriers and OEMs. OEMs dont lock bootloaders, carriers do, the proof is just above you, CANADA, land of the true free
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] RedIronCrown:
I don't know that we in Canada are completely immune to bootloader locking, we have only three major carriers and they act in collusion sometimes. Besides, you can buy a bootloader-unlocked S4 in the US, just not from AT&T or Verizon. Hell, we can't even get the Google Play Edition here.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] wingzero1:
Yeah I know the difference carriers and OEMs thanks. But OEMs have to provide the unlock. HtC is a case in point.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] lowandbehold:
Although your points aren't bad, your reasonings are absolutely wrong. Locking the bootloader has nothing to do with trying to prevent bricks or fraud. It is Samsung's way of trying to win contracts to provide phones for businesses and the government. If anything, a locked bootloader will create more bricks and frauds as there will always be ways around it..those ways will just be more difficult and cause more bricks.

The Google Edition's should not be for people wanting an unlocked bootloader. Some people enjoy Touchwiz. To be completely honest, I am surprised Samsung even put out a Google Edition phone. They are trying as hard as they can to distance themselves from Android...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Marvelicious75:
Just as a point of fact, Magnuson-Moss is for 'consumer products', not just cars. Personally, I'd consider a phone a consumer product, though apparently that isn't a foregone conclusion...

From the Wikipedia page:

I tend to agree that the smart thing is to buy the GE, effective voting with your dollar. Unfortunately, AT&T (...and others...) seem inclined to make it difficult for people to get an equivalent experience without their contract.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] informpage:
True, but they want to make sure you don't run away with the phone and not pay your bill.