yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] Lehocki:
Hello. Ok so I created a ROM what I call MyTWGE (Tuchwiz Google Edition). Followed the instructions, unzipped the stock Verizon OS went into the -app- folder deleted all the Verizon, Samsung and Google apps (only the ones that are download able from Google Play). Replaced the stock launcher with the 5x6 version that I extracted from another zip, replaced the camera with the Google edition camera (download able from GP), replaced the keyboard with the Note2 keyboard (also unzipped from another zip). Looked around and deleted a few more files I found that were connected to some Samsung apps and zipped it up. Flashed the zip yesterday onto the phone and it's ALIVE working.

Thank you for your patience to write up all these instructions. I previously used TB to debloat my phone and that was it, learned a few thing thanks again
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] razz1:
Lol the whole time I was reading this I was waiting for you to say something didn't work out for you but it all did I guess. Nice!!
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] Lehocki:
Yeah running for the past 24h no problems everything works. Thanks

---------- Post added at 02:24 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:07 AM ----------

Only thing that that's annoying is the wifi in the taskbar. I read in one of the posts that I have to go into systemui and some other files within n delete lines 12 through 21 but that didn't work , am guessing I need to decompile systemui to do that. The person in the post didn't clarify and I'm not ready to do that yet. Reason is I don't know anything about programming or linux or decompiler or anything like that. Deleting files I can do replacing some sure. But I'm happy my first attempt to mix something together worked and I'll keep doing it till I actually figure out what it is that I am doing. Thanks again for the post
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] razz1:
Yea. Follow Didacts write ups to get you through it. It's all in framework res apk.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Syn3rgetic:
I was running RC1 of CM10.1 on my i747M. It had a lot of weird screen artifacts so I decided to upgrade. I got the re.bootloader error and knew I had to flash a new bootloader. LK4 in my case. I went ahead and flashed the new bootloader, followed by the ROM but now I'm stuck in the booting screen. I pulled the battery and installed AOKP instead. Same problem. Stuck in bootloader. I'm gonna try to revert to stock and see how that plays out.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Syn3rgetic:
Okay I flashed the latest stock image. I747MVLDMF1 (JB 4.1.2) and it actually booted into the OS.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Syn3rgetic:
Reflashed into AOKP. Boom, Bob's yer uncle.
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TheNerd:]:
I downloaded an apk from the Internet but I can't install it. When I open the apk the install button won't respond to anything. I can only press the cancelation button
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Chromium:
If u have halo on, disable it
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TheNerd:]:
It's okay I got it. But btw I do have halo
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] rexdog1888:
I was wondering if anyone has this and is willing to either PM it to me or post it here. I've searched everywhere and I cannot find the newest one and it isn't letting me download it from Google Play for some reason.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] iwearthebelt:
If you're rooted, as far as I know it won't work. There might be a workaround but I haven't seen one. I prefer Google wallet anyways.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] rexdog1888:
I had seen some people on some forum working on disabling the root check and I had a couple of ideas I wanted to try.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] stanfna:
based on this... http://www.droid-life.com/2013/07/1...ard-if-you-add-a-credit-card-to-your-account/

i would be interested in this as well. :cool:
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] Spider210:
I'd love to know if someone can disable the root check
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] rexdog1888:
I will try(absolutely no promises it'll work) if someone will upload the apk.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] rexdog1888:
This was the source of my renewed effort in getting to work. ;)
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] Ainster:
sorry for post i have fixed the probliem...
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 General] adam_beasley:
Recently my xda has been going off at 11,30am every day, it is the standard alarm clock program included within WM2003, however it is not listed in the panel of times to alarm.

Is there a way of clearing the missing setting from registry?

Its starting to get annoying after a night shift, and its required to be on and near me for important calls and messages.

Thanks
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 General] davidberrysmith:
try these, worked for me.
[Droid RAZR M Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mrnathanman:
Question:will someone help me?

I will begin by saying that I have no idea where the problem exists for my individual situation, and it would be great if I could get some help.

Background:

I used to run Dead Rage 1.2.

Now I have been back and fourth between Skrilax nightlies and Bytecode's cm10.1 with little to no hiccups.

Over time I began to notice a little lag(notification drawer, swiftkey, and basic ui elements).

Problem description:

Then I decided to try some other roms to fix my issues.

When I flash Carbon rom:

- It has no lock screen by default (and I have not been able to fix this in lockscreen settings)

- The home button does not work (neither in pie controls)

- the quick settings panel button in the notification drawer does not open the quick settings( nor can I access the quick settings any other way)

- the home screen apps are strangely and slightly above the software buttons

I saw someone with similar problems in the posts of carbon but it was resolved by a single reflash.

I also tried a relatively new rom called Revolt on droidrzr:

- I experienced similar issues with the home button

- I did not delve into the issues more because the issues were similar to carbon

Explained, further:

As explained above I have flashed without issue before.

I am under the impression that the way to flash is:

1. mount system

2. wipe system

3. repeat

4. reboot recovery

5. mount system

6. flash

I have tried every variation on this set of rules I think is possible for carbon. I initially had TWRP 2.3. I have flashed without rebooting recovery, without mounting system, with a factory reset on the previous rom, wiping cache and delvik as well. If I don't wipe the system I get weird crashes and the home button still doesn't work but it fixes other things like quick settings. Sometimes when I would wipe system, and not do a factory reset, and flash carbon all my apps from the Bytecode build persisted. This made me think it was a recovery problem.

Then I flashed TWRP 2.5. I have similarly tried everything with TWRP 2.5 and get the same results. I have tried 6/21, 6/23, 7/2, 7/4 carbon on both recoveries.

I have a backup of bytecode cm10.1 and I am running that currently.

If some one would help me troubleshoot or fix my problem, I would love to get carbon. And I would be very much appreciative.

If I am in the wrong place please point me.

I did not post in the carbon topic because I do not have more than 10 posts.

I know that people are not paid to help me so I respect when they do.

Also if you need screenshots, I can reflash carbon and take some shots too.
[Droid RAZR M Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jco23:
see post #7 here: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2355676

this should probably be in the Q&A/Help/Troubleshooting section....
[Droid RAZR M Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mrnathanman:
Thank You So Much!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I know its soon and I am still crossing my fingers, but thank you!
[Motorola Atrix HD] rockstar.7:
i has been googled it,but the solution none work,

sometime after i take some photo I receive a message "Camera is unable to initialize."

and I close the camera app and open again the message gone but when I take photo the camera stuck like process want to take photo,

i try to open camera360 then I receive a message "Failed to take picture because of phone rom. Please tap [OK] to take another one."

when I rebooted it's normal again,I was try to clear cache and wipe cache but it's still like that,

I'm in stock Bell rom 4.1.2.

i got this problem when I in stock AT&T 4.1.1 Rom and now I flash it to Bell Rom.

what wrong with my AHD?

sorry for my bad english
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] musicafe:
I currently am running Frosty Bean and it is a fine rom. I would like to try others to compare but run into Google login, apn issues etc.

I've done all the wipe dalvik, system cache, etc.. but haven't been able to get any others to settle in and run.

This isnt my first rodeo I've flashed my Lg g2x tons of times. I see the modems vary here by models.

Any help would be appreciated.

Thanx XDA

Sent from my SGH-T889 Frosty Bean
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] parusia:
Try Tweaked I use to flash Roms every day and sometimes few times a day when I first brought my phone back in November, but since I found Tweaked I don't have the need to go anywhere else. Is a wonderfull Rom and wonderful dev.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] deeznutz1977:
+1 I agree 1000%
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] gshadow325:
A third on Tweaked 2.3 rom.

two things that got me into tweaked away from jedi series roms

*you can hide that stupid blocking icon when you turn on blocking mode

*WORKING group text messaging!!!!!!!!!

it has all the pluses of Jedi Master 14 and more customization ohh yeah working wifi calling tooo:good::good::good::good::good::good:
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] Warrior1975:
Tweaked FTW!! Definitely worth a peak.

sgh-TWEAKED-889©
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] gshadow325:
one other thing i might add to why i like tweaked over Jedi, low battery notification disable. this is especially usefull when you have a 9300mah ZeroLemon battery, where you can stay at 5% for 8 hours..that beep and nag starting at 15% can lasts for hours on end!!
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] xamindar:
Yes, go tweaked. The dev is an actual Dev, not just someone who dumps a bunch of random mods on the rom. He actually knows what he is doing. Try it out!
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kintwofan:
Hey guys, Tweaked is the truth abs by far the best ROM for our phones, but be careful. Some especially this last post are coming off pretty disrespectful to our devs. pmtr3 does some amazing work and a lot of original work. Just don't want this to stay making devs want to quit supporting a community because they feel like it's disrespectful.

By the way xamindar, give it a shot just "dumping random mods" and let me know how stable that turns out. A lot of work goes into even the "basic" ROMs.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] gshadow325:
If i sounded like i was being disrespectful, I apologize. No way did i mean it to come off that way. I appreciate what YOU Developers do for us. I know i cant do what you guys do. Jedi/pmtr3 roms and kernals are great thats why i use it as a reference standard to compare to.

I should have chose my words better since i didnt think that it would offend someone else. sorry
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] Kal-El7:
Tweaked is the business. The dev is super mature, very amazing attitude and personality and his work matches these qualities, bar none. It's also a joy to see a community very, very active. It means that this ROM gets a lot of dialogue in its thread, which leads to great ideas, trials, progress and advancement. I came from another ROM that just went stale. No dialogue. And I've tried other ROMs on XDA which are pretty ingenious and brilliant, but the smoothness of Tweaked, the vision it projects and employs and support it has is amazing. And nothing ever feels broken. More and more conversations are about progression than fixing something that's legitimately broken in the ROM. The Dev is also extremely approachable....if you have ideas, just Private Message (the preferred method) the Dev and you'll see how engaging he becomes. Very, very professional feel to this community. Check it out.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kintwofan:
You didn't offend me and I'm no Dev. I'm just trying to learn. My comment was more directed at the other guy who came off very disrespectful (whether meant or not). I don't want people like pmtr3 or the other real devs to get offended. I mean tweaked is the best, but you can never have to many options.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] Gack69:
To me, Tweaked is the best fit for my tastes. It's rock solid, and like others have already said here, Dwitherell is amazing and his OCD leads to a very polished final product for us to enjoy. :D the degree of customization you have is

Unparalleled. Not only options you set when you flash, but also through TSM parts. The initial Lure for me was the ability to hide that damn annoying persistent notification for Smart stay and blocking mode... Etc.

I could go on and on... But really... Flashing is easy and fun... I recommend trying as many as you want and decide for yourself.

Plus... Tweaked had something no other ROM does.... ALEXIA! ;)
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] gshadow325:
you can block smart stay? OMG do tell, i didnt turn it on cause i hate all thsoe icons on my status bar!
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] Warrior1975:
Well said. Jedi ROMS are awesome as well. Ptmr3 is one hell of a nice guy as well. I'm grateful for all of our devs here, but those two gentlemen are awesome dudes.

sgh-TWEAKED-889©
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] xamindar:
WHAO dude. No need to get offended as I was not directing that towards anyone. I don't think it is very nice of you to throw out other devs names as of trying to defend them for something that wasn't meant towards them either. This can make them look bad.

And your second paragraph is what I am talking about. People who throw random mods together and call it a new rom usually end up creating something very unstable. Point is, tweaked is NOT this.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kintwofan:
Again, I'm not offended I just didn't want it to go there of insulting the hard work or devs do. I may have took your quote wrong as saying that's what the other devs do. So I was just thinking of the biggest ROM and dev we had and said that's not what he does. So for the misunderstanding I'm sorry.

All our devs do great work, but I do agree dwitherell is on another level! He originates mods and has been since the DROID charge!
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] MajorTom_:
Carbon Rom. Easily.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] parusia:
Carbon Rom is a 4.2.2 Rom, the OP is asking about UVBMB4 4.1.2 Roms.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] MajorTom_:
Oh I thought the OP was just stating what they were currently on. It does seem like that.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] AngryDinosaur:
I'm tweaked too, I used to be Jedi x but tweaked really got great built in options, and more to come it seems ;)
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] Kenbals:
I dont know what this phone would be like without Tweaked. Its perfect. Every update is perfecter lol. Dwith is awesome man!!! It shouldve came with Tweaked from factory.

My Note 2 is Tweaked!
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] Gack69:
Is an option in TSM parts! Simply enable it

:D
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] i_guana:
You too eh? I noticed the same thing with my zerolemon and was wondering if it was a flaw in the battery electronics. It seems to fall quicker than you would expect until you get low and it almost hovers there for a day. I'm on X15 and will give Tweaked a try.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] MajorTom_:
Since it's 4.1.2 then I too would go with tweaked
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] janjannsen99:
All of them.

---------- Post added at 03:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:40 PM ----------

Your question is an unanswerable question. It depends solely on what you like. How are we supposed to know that? . Now go in the development section and go READ.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] Warrior1975:
Great answer. Go read. Why even other posting in the thread?

sgh-TWEAKED-889©
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] janjannsen99:
Exactly that's how I find my stuff

---------- Post added at 03:15 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:14 AM ----------

I dont ask what everyone uses. I find what I want. Hey what are you eating tonight. Oh ok I'm going to go eat that too because you said so....
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] Warrior1975:
That's your way, he/she has his. Person is just asking a simple question, asking opinions. Whatever, doesn't really matter, I was just curious as to your "advice".

sgh-TWEAKED-889©
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] janjannsen99:
I domt have any advice to give except tmobile note 2 android development section. Sorry
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] musicafe:
Thanks for the suggestions im gonna give tweaked a try as so far tweaked has the most recommendations so far.

Appreciate the feedback :D
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] derekedw:
Starting a bounty for Google wallet working on the ATT HTC One.

I'll start with $10 for specific ROM and $20 if it can be added to any ROM. Root does not matter for me.

Total

Specific ROM - $10

Any ROM - $20
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] crucial929:
have you not read the other wallet threads? phone lacks a secure element which means wallet wont work ...
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] agreen123:
Upping the bounty another $500

I'll up the bounty by adding US$500 to Derek's bounty. I want my Wallet on my HTC One, either the AT&T version or the Google Edition.

---------- Post added at 07:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:15 PM ----------

Ooops :) LOL...

Last I had heard, it was only that the secure element was not enabled in the ROMs, and that with the proper software it could have been enabled...

So I'm definitely wrong in my understanding? What a bummer... :(
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] derekedw:
Yeah it was my understanding this is a software issue and it might be possible to port from sprint one.

I have read the threads and seen nothing conclusive from a dev.
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] agreen123:
Well, if it is a software/fixable issue, my bounty stands :)
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] derekedw:
Awesome! I'd honestly like to know either way. Seriously considering s4 for this reason.
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] crucial929:
I'd love to have Google wallet, only thing I miss from sprint
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] derekedw:
Then add to the bounty :p
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] Wasuhz:
I will add 30$ to this bounty.
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] badgcoupe:
Count me in for $10 on this
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] jgrimberg1979:
I am in for 10
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] NJGSII:
I would love to put some money into, but I just don't think it will feasible. Our version of the One(which hardware wise is the same as the Google Play Edition as described in the link below) lack the secure element, a piece of hardware that is required for Wallet to work.

http://www.androidpolice.com/2013/07/27/psa-google-wallet-not-compatible-with-the-2013-nexus-7/
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] Tower1972:
I just read that ISIS is set for a nationwide rollout sometime this year, and will require a special SIM to activate that element. Which leads me to believe we have it, just not the means to activate it?!?!
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] NJGSII:
You know what I'm not sure. In theory that could work, but the carriers might still find a way to disable wallet I'm sure. How long Isis has been trying to come out anyway? I've heard of it back all the way in the fall of 2011.
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] Tower1972:
its been awhile alright. I used to have Wallet on my old GNEX, and sort of miss it, but if HTC did infact make these flagship phones without the secure element needed to run Wallet OR ISIS, I will finally have something to be disappointed in with the One :(
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] cmjkxa:
The Isis Sim has a secure element in the sim specifically for Isis. Isis doesn't even use the secure element inside the phone hardware with phones that do have it, thus the need for the SE Sim.
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] Trinition:
You probably don't have a SIM with a secure element right now, but carriers would start giving you one when you asked once ISIS rolls out to your area. And, as I understand it, Google Wallet won't trust a secure element on a SIM card -- only one in the phone. Likewise, ISIS won't trust one in the phone and will only trust one on the SIM.

---------- Post added at 12:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:29 PM ----------

Anyone want to indulge me here?

So Google Wallet is a software application. A secure element is a hardware feature that we do/do-not have depending on who you ask. For the sake of argument, let's say we don't have it.

At the point where the software wants to use that hardware, what is it doing? Is it calling an API in the OS? A function in the kernel? If so, and we have all of these great ROM and kernel developers on XDA, couldn't such an API call or kernel functional call be stubbed to make Google Wallet think there's a secure element when in fact there isn't?

---------- Post added at 12:36 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:32 PM ----------

Count me in for $10.
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] AJerman:
Yes, I have the SE SIM from AT&T, still doesn't work for Wallet, though if anyone thinks they can figure out a way to make Wallet see the SE SIM, I'm down to try it. If you call AT&T they will send you an SE SIM now. They might say they can't, just tell them to double check because they've got em and I'm not in a market for ISIS yet.

I'm converted to GE though and I can't even install ISIS because I guess it doesn't have support for GE, at least not yet. Gotta find the APK somewhere.
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] thatotherguy..:
I need one person running 4.2.2 ge Rom and one running sense 4.2.2 to pm me
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] earbrain:
Will this not work guys?http://blog.al-aqel.com/android/guides/google-wallet-on-unsupported-devices/ In the process of trying when I have time today. eb
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] usmcxdroid:
Tryed it, no luck here. It stays at the first screen where it says it can take up to 5 mins to set up but doesnt go past that. Thanks anyway.
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] earbrain:
Damn, same here.
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] thatotherguy..:
Try this http://db.tt/FYuU4p9x unzip it then move it to system/app set permissions,reboot and try it out, not to sure if it will work but worth a try

The apks only work on 4.2.2
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] usmcxdroid:
No luck with this one either, thanks nonetheless.
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] thatotherguy..:
Did you move both apk?
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] usmcxdroid:
Im i supposed to replace the NFC.apk in system/apps with the one from the .zip? Thanks in advance.
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] thatotherguy..:
Yea move both from the zip
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] bdorr1105:
I am seeking help in the Sprint Forum, we are missing necessary libs and I am trying to pinpoint what it is, the secure element is not hardware, its software related, they did not build the Sprint HTC One any differently than the other HTC Ones except for obviously Radio hardware for CDMA....I am requesting the Libs and trying to get a zip that pushes the NFC lib files.....
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] thatotherguy..:
I have sprint htc one,, I'm just waiting til someone moves both apk I posted in the system/app and tell me if they work
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] bdorr1105:
Someone already did try and they said it did not work, there are specific libs in addition that needs to be included as well
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] thatotherguy..:
He only used one apk, how about you move both and see what happens
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] usmcxdroid:
No it did not work. And it actually send my phone into a loop sort of speak with the mssage that the nfc had stopped working and it was a pain to get it back to normal so definitely not messing with that nfc.apk file anymore lol
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] agreen123:
Anyone try this yet? I would give it a shot, but my phone is running CM...

As I understand it, I can get the stock ROMs from HTC and re-install those, can't I?
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] bdorr1105:
It has been tried I started a whole OP. It's getting stuck on the setting up Wallet for 5 minutes and timing out for what ever reason, this seems like it may not like the build.prop