yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] .c0dy:
First two options didnt work. Trying number 3 now :D

Nope: Still the same error. I simply cant get the patches picked.

here the git status

DevDistro samsung-kernel-jfltexx # git status
# On branch aosp-4.2.2
# Changes to be committed:
#
#	modified: Makefile
#	modified: arch/arm/Makefile
#	modified: arch/arm/mach-msm/Makefile
#	modified: drivers/gpu/Makefile
#	modified: drivers/gpu/ion/Makefile
#	modified: drivers/gpu/ion/msm/Makefile
#	modified: drivers/gpu/msm/Makefile
#	modified: init/Kconfig
#
# Unmerged paths:
# (use "git add/rm <file>..." as appropriate to mark resolution)
#
#	deleted by us: arch/arm/configs/jf_brood_defconfig
#	deleted by us: build_clean
#	deleted by us: build_dirty
#

EDIT:

Now step by step:

Each Git status after each step

After cloning

DevDistro samsung-kernel-jfltexx # git status
# On branch aosp-4.2.2
nothing to commit (working directory clean)

After adding git remote - no changes

After fetching

DevDistro samsung-kernel-jfltexx # git fetch bare
warning: no common commits
remote: Counting objects: 50312, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (40130/40130), done.
remote: Total 50312 (delta 9686), reused 50269 (delta 9643)
Receiving objects: 100% (50312/50312), 130.96 MiB | 709 KiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (9686/9686), done.
From https://github.com/broodplank/android-kernel-samsung-jfltexx
* [new branch] jb-4.2 -> bare/jb-4.2
* [new branch] jb-4.3 -> bare/jb-4.3
DevDistro samsung-kernel-jfltexx # git status
# On branch aosp-4.2.2
nothing to commit (working directory clean)

Cherry-pick:

DevDistro samsung-kernel-jfltexx # git cherry-pick 69b6e56fb4151f547368fc77d5ad682fbf99ea7b
error: could not apply 69b6e56... Switch to Linaro, credits to Albinoman887 and ktoonsez
hint: after resolving the conflicts, mark the corrected paths
hint: with 'git add <paths>' or 'git rm <paths>'
hint: and commit the result with 'git commit'

DevDistro samsung-kernel-jfltexx # git status
# On branch aosp-4.2.2
# Changes to be committed:
#
#	modified: Makefile
#	modified: arch/arm/Makefile
#	modified: arch/arm/mach-msm/Makefile
#	modified: drivers/gpu/Makefile
#	modified: drivers/gpu/ion/Makefile
#	modified: drivers/gpu/ion/msm/Makefile
#	modified: drivers/gpu/msm/Makefile
#	modified: init/Kconfig
#
# Unmerged paths:
# (use "git add/rm <file>..." as appropriate to mark resolution)
#
#	deleted by us: arch/arm/configs/jf_brood_defconfig
#	deleted by us: build_clean
#	deleted by us: build_dirty
#
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] .c0dy:
Damn this is annoying.

It says it can not apply the patches. But it's changeing the files anyway.

Now it even cant execute the toolchain-binaries anymore. -.- I'm going crazy!

EDIT: Nvm. I've just read on the toolchain-thread, that i'll need a 64-Bit-System for these toolchains or rebuild them myself on a 32-Bit-System.

EDIT 2: Building the toolchain for 32-bit atm and will try again afterwards
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] harise100:
Why so complicated?

I'm using the pre-built Google NDK tool chains. No problems.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] .c0dy:
They are not based on linaro, right?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] harise100:
Don't know. Does it matter?

I can compile with O3 and the result is different than using no flags or O2.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] .c0dy:
Well, i just found a thread of Ezekeel where he compared the different toolchains.

It seems that they do not really make any difference.

So maybe it IS just the flags, that do the difference.

Will try the google TC :)

Thanks
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] broodplank1337:
Wow did you actually build on a 32bit system all the time? Since that makes it way harder to complete the job. 32 bit is outdated in linux and should not be used for android developing,

And yes it does matter a lot what toolchain you are using. either choose for plain arm-eabi from google (With some linaro based optimizations inside, but NOT ALL) or use a real linaro toolchain, the one I use is specially optimized. there is MAJOR difference in how the kernel runs (as in smoothness, battery life etc) when it's compiled with different toolchains, anyways, I think you really need to use 64bit OS, if your pc doesn't support it then you should use a VM (like devdistro) if that's possible. Android developing on a 32bit system is just not right ;)

edit: lol I see you are already using DevDistro in the log you posted, so that means your building on 64bit right? (or have you named your pc devdistro?)
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] .c0dy:
Nono. The 32-bit is just the "Fun-PC" at work hehe.

at home i use VM with devdistro. There i got enough power. i7 @ 4.5GHz, 16GB RAM, SSD's (got the vm on the Samsung 840 Pro SSD) and all stuff like that :P

EDIT: But that still cant be the problem with the cherry-picks.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] broodplank1337:
ah ok, was already thinking how you built it on a 32bit machine hehe.

Oh and your home pc sounds awesome! If you would install a native linux installation (dualboot) the kernel would build in like a minute :)
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] .c0dy:
I could give the VM a bit more resources :D It's pretty nice as it is. I can compile the kernel in about 4-5 minutes and play Battlefield 3 on my windows-system at the same time :D haha.

Just a few more minutes and i'm back home. Then i can try to find a solution for the cherries!!! :fingers-crossed:

EDIT: I just saw, that the VM only got 1 Core :P So i gave it 4 cores now and 2GB RAM. Should speed up the process a bit :D
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] broodplank1337:
Updated sources to 3.4.54
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] broodplank1337:
2 NEW branches for Android 4.3.

https://github.com/broodplank/samsung-kernel-jfltexx/tree/aosp-4.3

and

https://github.com/broodplank/samsung-kernel-jfltexx/tree/tw-4.3

NOT TESTED YET. I'm compiling AOSP 4.3 atm XD

This could be the solution to custom 4.3 kernels hopefully!
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] broodplank1337:
whahahaha idd fingers crossed

compiling it right now, will post test 4.3 kernel if it works

ok its not fully compiling, not suprised by that, although the number of errors is not that worse, if someone spends a few hours on this it could be fixed ;)
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] boterkaaseneieren:
Are you going to post it here?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] hailmary:
Broodplank.do it.we are waiting like piranhas:D
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] thehacker911:
Great instructions! Everything worked out wonderfully! Can you perhaps tell me how I change the kernel name? My to the Settings -> About the unit -> Kernel Version. 3.4.54-xxx to 3.4.54-my-kernel-name? Thanks

Edit: It is a TW 4.2.2 Kernel...

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9505 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] broodplank1337:
Thanks! That's good to hear. to change the kernel name you can open the .confg file and search for the localversion string, something like this:

CONFIG_LOCALVERSION="-Kernel_Version_here_no_spaces_allowed"

or use "make xconfig" and then search (control+f) for version. you can add the name there like this: "-kernel_name_no_spaces"
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] thehacker911:
Thanks will try it out! Thank you!

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9505 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] broodplank1337:
Updated sources 4.2.2 AOSP/TW to 3.4.55
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] broodplank1337:
Guys, the kernel source for 4.3 is out (sources from samsung). Happy custom kernel developing ;)

https://github.com/broodplank/samsung-kernel-jfltexx

branch aosp-4.3 (became default branch)
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] harise100:
Will you ever update this to 3.4.59+?

Or can you tell me how to update the sources myself ?

Thanks in advance.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] thehacker911:
Hi I have made ​​an update to the toolchain (gcc 4.7). Now I can not quite ready to create the kernel. Are you a link to the current Toolcahin?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Android Development] broodplank1337:
going to patch it now to 3.4.60 :)

and look at post #2

Take this one: http://www.mediafire.com/download/i...linaro_4.7.4-2013.07-build_2013_07_12.tar.bz2.

And im actually not a hyperink you know. im a human ;)
[T-Mobile HTC One (M7)] shadowmike:
So far since tmo enabled lte in Cleveland I've accumulated a lot of data traffic
[About XDA developers] tim_programmer:
I am new to this community (this may even be one of my first posts, i cant remeber) but ive read alot of what is going on.

this is no matter what people say a good site....but recently its unbearably slow which is really killing the community sharing help etc, the ftp got wiped out, im sure alot of the members who put worki into that are extremely annoyed, and finally there are so many people on the forum posing the same old 'help i did this' stuff...which leads to the conclusion that the faqs need an update.

well i am unsure of who the admin(s) are but it looks like you guys are struggling or do not have the time to solve these issues on your own.... which i can appreciate.

so i for one would like to offer some help...and im sure the older more experienced members would lend a hand too.

my initial thoughts would be to get some of you veterans to update the faqs try to incorporate the whole upgrading and downgrading as simply as possible... far too many ppl are trying 2005. o and a nice clear sign about the mda3 unlocking.

the other thing i feel is a necessary step is to make the ftp readonly to normal users and have a set of superusers with write access...these would be the people that use it the most or are well respected members...if someone other than them have something worth uploading then they need to send it to a superuser to check and do... its a minor point but it would provide some security without hindering those superusers that need to upload regularly.

finally the slowness.. i dont know whats causing it but theres a solution to every problem...if the server has a low throughput im sure i read somewhere someones company was willing to donate a dedicated server to our cause...wouldnt evev need donations with that.

well theres my 2 pence what do you guys think? i want this community to keep going..the only way thats gonna happen is by putting some effort in!

Tim :)
[About XDA developers] Anton.Valleyman:
I wholeheartedly agree.

In recent months there has been a real decline in the quality of this forum, and though it's not particularly anyone's fault, there is SO much repetition and laziness by so many people who post the same questions AGAIN and AGAIN without taking the time to search first. There's fresh examples of this within the past day!

I don't know how others feel, but as far as I'm concerned there are certain rules that should be followed if a forum is to keep it's usefulness and keep to a structured order. I used to run one many moons ago so I know what I'm talking about. Firstly, people seem to post wherever they want, regardless of content. I can't count the number of times I've seen "help crashed my XDA2 going up to WM2003SE" in General or Development/Hacking. 99 times out of 100 it will be the Country ID error, something I've read about so many times I could now fix in my sleep. I can understand people's panic when this happens as it happened to me as well, but what I did was calm down, get on here and search for Country ID errors. Low and behold, DCS and edSub to the rescue and within half an hour I was back on the road to Upgradeville.

Secondly, there's been a general increase in the rudeness of people posting; from new members and old. Some think that it's OK to post half their question in the Subject, then go "anyone got any ideas?". Then when there's no response within a few hours, the same poster is back saying "no one seen this?" or with some insult about people not helping. Even I've had an odd dig the odd time, so I know how easily it happens.

Thirdly, the WM2005 interest is hacking me off. I can appreciate it if it solves the problems of those using it over 2003SE, but (and I can't believe I'M saying this) just cos it's out there doesn't mean we have to have it - especially considering the risks of such a topic. I'm no legal expert on this but I know MS have been coming down HARD on ANYONE hosting or posting screenshots / divulging information about an alpha product (AFAIK). I wish the moderators would remove this, and then emphasise, as they have done on tekguru, that they will not comment / tolerate any hosting or screenshots etc. I don't want to see this site shut down, and I've posted about it before, only to find a few days later some idiot HAS uploaded the files to the FTP. I bet it hasn't helped the recent slowness, quite aside from its illegality!!

http://www.tekguru.co.uk/phpBB2/index.php?article=5813

I agree Tim, I too would love to lend a hand where needed. I would be happy to help with constructing more up to date FAQs like on tekguru, and I completely agree that FTP needs to be readonly to all new users and most regular members also (prob inc me :shock: ). This site needs to get back on track, as it's still by far the most useful and helpsite resource for XDA/MDA/whatever and I would hate to see it go down the pan.

Ant
[About XDA developers] tim_programmer:
glad to see i'm not the only one willing to lend a hand :)

if we can get a few more people willing to help then it wont take very long at all to get this place going well again
[About XDA developers] unapproachable2kx:
I think Admins have abandoned XDA-Developers site time ago,but in some topics I read that they were busy with the Xanadux Project(Linux port),try to ask more to Peter Poelman e Lumpistefan about admins. 8)

So,I agree partially,there is no return from hold Win2k5,we need to keep it, we are a community,we will not share it in the FTP for security but need to know more about it,reverse it. You can't stop the knowoledge! Also Win2k3SE for XDA2,it is not officially announced,but you can read plenty of posts.

Some minor things to Upgrade,Improve in this site are:

-Create a CHAT in the site: Many users will benefit to this live communication,not only posts.

-NEW Profiles: add XDA3,Magician,etc..options

-Avatars disappeared, admin told it is for couple of weeks,some months ago.

-Improve the Search engine: Did you try to search something? it will return too many post,unrelated.

-Find and fix why XDA-Developers is so slow.
[About XDA developers] tim_programmer:
heh you just reminded me...the chat thing

i thought it would be nice to do an irc channel :)

and thanks for the info i will email peter... if the admins are busy with xanadux thats fine (im quite interested in the project) but we could do with someone to step in and keep this place running (peter?) and to organise a team to do what we all see as the issues.

as to the legality of win mob 2005...ive never cared about legal issues personally...but from the point of view of admin it must be removed off of xda dev...if someone hosts it somewhere and links it in a foum be it on their head... but xda dev cannot host it for their own safety
[About XDA developers] Anton.Valleyman:
Exactly, MS have shut down sites for simply having posted screenshots, or at least told them in no uncertain terms, to remove them. To find we have uploaded installation files to this site is a big concern to me and MUST be sorted.
[About XDA developers] Mouseman1463:
Count me in!

Hi all,

I've been scrounging through these forums for a while now and have learnt a lot - cheers to all with the knowledge who are willing to share. I've managed to unlock XDA 1, 2 and 2s (ok, had to pay to sim unlock MDA3 - but found the link here! ;-) ) recently as mentioned we have a painfully slow site, a simple search provides 50 pages of mostly unrelated threads, 10 pages of which are all about the same thing! I'm more than happy to help sort out some proper FAQ pages; I've cocked up on ROM flashing due to country ID too! It's a panicky situation - none of us wants a 200-400 pound paperweight! In short - count me in for hands on help, I'd love to learn more but also help the others out a bit.

Mike
[About XDA developers] tim_programmer:
well i sent a pm to peter and no reply as yet (its only been a day so im not giving up yet) but i just read another post of someone tring to get in contact and he seemed to have very little luck... im running out of ideas here i want to help but if the main ppl are not around then we cant really do much... it looks like the admin team have gone completely awol ... im almost tempted to say we should find someon willing to do free hosting (someone mentioned it in one of th forums) and mirror the site...but that defeats the idea of having one nice place... id raher fix than replace....anyone got any ideas?
[About XDA developers] LumpiStefan:
I'm far away being an admin or anything else here. :roll: I'm just a normal user as you are...

But I've talked to a few of the xda-deveolpers team at the fair cebit in the middle of march. They have lot of work, so this maybe the point why they aren't so often in the forum. And i think for 99% the community just works well without any of those "admins"...

The profiles (XDA and XDA II) are a special patch for the phpBB-Software. Sadly this patch do not allow more than two profiles. This is the case why only those 2 profiles exists and why the forum is splitted in seperate sections (XDA, XDA II, MAgician, Blueangel, ...)

Regards

Stefan
[About XDA developers] tim_programmer:
hey thanks for the info lumpistefan

tis a bit of a shame we cant get hold of someone able to solve the slowness and ftp issue!

with regards to the faq's im gonna try and make an introduction to the himalaya cover sim lock flashing and a few other important things in my spare time if anyone feels like working on the other hansets feel free.. my plan is to do it over next couple of weeks and post it for review make sure i cover everything.
[About XDA developers] flintanis:
Looks like the site is starting to get quicker again.

Well done to who ever fixed this.

Much more enjoyable browsing through the posts.

Keep up the good work.
[About XDA developers] cruisin-thru:
Amphetamine dust on the cpu did the trick.
[About XDA developers] dcs:
Thank you tim_programmer for starting this topic.

I am coming towards the end of a project that's been keeping me busy. Once finished, I would be happy to lend a hand also.

Whilst lumpistefan has a point about admins, I believe they are needed. Human nature dictates that while the cat's away the mice will play. Trouble is, some of the mice (the 1%) are turning into rats :)

As regards WM2005, although I don't agree in censorship in that we should be able to discuss it, etc., it is obvious that Microsoft are not going to tolerate very much and we (the site) are on very thin ice by allowing hosting of content and links, etc. Again, it is the admins duty to sort this out. We have pushed the envelope with stuff before, but that involved already released products.

Some of us reverse, some of us hack. We can still do that when WM2005 is released officially (in whatever language :) )
[About XDA developers] tim_programmer:
i agree server has got quicker...tis nice

with regards to wm2005 its only the hosting im concerned with everything else like discussing hacking reverse engineering go for it!
[About XDA developers] SiliconS:
Ummm.... (I'm feeling like I might regret this...) it wouldn't be that hard to start an alternative website for these machines. Not that I wish to minimise the huge contribution made by xda-developers.com to the understanding and improving ;) of these HTC devices, but if the admins on this site don't have the time to moderate it and manage it and don't respond to offers of help or support then perhaps we should form an alternative?

I'm a web developer and have worked in the past with the Minerva forum/website package ( www.project-minerva.org ) and it's very very good when you're looking for a website-in-a-box. It wouldn't be so hard to set it up and try to take some of the load off xda-developers.com while acknowledging the work that's been done here so far.

Edit - as for the site getting quicker, well it isn't for me. Just took 5 minutes to submit this post...

I don't often look at this site these days because the speed is so bad. It'll be losing regulars already I'm sure. :(
[About XDA developers] willpower102:
wow. this hasn't been posted in in forever. Sorry to revive this but there is some good info here. I want to help get this site back on track as well. I have tons of free time to dedicate as well.
[About XDA developers] kevino:
Yep, got to agree. The main problem is lazyness by posters. No one reads http://xdaforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=4534.

There are so many infringements of 1,2,and 5.

But what can you do ? You can't just ban people, because its normally just done once or twice by somebody when they are desperate for a solution.

The problem here is, as was said higher up, the number of threads on the same subject almost makes the search useless because it is hard to find the one with the definitive answer. I try to help people but when you see a question that has been asked numerous times before you think "why should I bother, I'll have to search to point hime in the correct direction, so why can't he"

What I did suggest was that duplicated posts/repeated topics were moved to a repetition bin, and deleted after a week. But at the moment the amount of work for the mods each day would be huge.
[About XDA developers] dahquim:
I agree with everythig that has been said in this post, I have been browsing xda-developers for about 3 years now, altho i have only been registered about a year, as my contribution has been very little.

However i feel that my knowledge has increase greatly, mainly due to this site, and i would love to help with FAQ's, Admin, Reviews, and anything else you guys want help with. I dont have a lot of free time, but any that i do have i will gladly donate to xda-developers in the hope that we can make this site what it used to be.

I think it is obvious that something needs to be done, but at the moment we only have suggestions and unless someone steps forward with a solution that is all this post is going to be. (this sounds a bit harsh, sorry).

So here's to keeping the community alive.

Dahquim
[About XDA developers] findus:
This would be a massive task, sure, but a site this big could do with more moderators to move and delete duplicate posts. There are a lot of people who have been a member of this site for quite some time who I am sure wouldn't mind chipping in to help if they were asked, I know I would like the chance to give more back to this site after the help, support and knowledge I have gained. How many moderators do we have at the moment? Just my thoughts, I love this forum and would love to help improve it.