yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[HTC One Mini] xda2_haseeb:
Yeah, there still is no word on the battery i guess. I'm also looking into it, the HTC One X had a great battery life when i used it. HTC One i supposed also has that good or not? What do you say?

Lolx... Now that you mentioned it, i also noticed that i did start a war but it was unintentional :-O
[HTC One Mini] pandaball:
I removed 2 questions with references to the "other flagship from another manufacturer". Those questions would fall under comparison threads and usually get flamed to oblivion :)
[HTC One Mini] ataft:
The camera looks slightly recessed in the picture. Interesting.
[HTC One Mini] nudr01d:
That looks a better idea to me, having it recessed.

Noticed that it also has the flash on top of the lens, is that a new placement?

My One has the flash to the side of the lens. Might be because mine is the silver model or because it's the UK model?
[HTC One Mini] ataft:
Ah you're right, that is different as well.

I wish the camera was recessed in the One. I would use a skin on the back and go caseless if it was like that.
[HTC One Mini] metazcq:
The camera looks slightly recessed in the picture. Interesting.
[HTC One Mini] xda2_haseeb:
Sure, No Problem :)

Its because its HTC One mini, it not due to different color or model :)
[HTC One Mini] I Am Marino:
The mini probably will have equal battery life, I'm sure there'll be a smaller battery.

-Sent from Marino's One-
[HTC One Mini] xda2_haseeb:
I didn't think about it that way before :)
[HTC One Mini] ImJacky:
I'm the only one thinking that a Mini version is useless?
[HTC One Mini] xda2_haseeb:
I wouldn't say it useless, it would be cheaper so i would love to buy it maybe :D
[HTC One Mini] Dryvlyne:
I just got my One yesterday and I was initially unsure whether I would like the size. After having hands-on time with it I actually really like the size. I'm coming from an original HTC EVO 4G and what I find amazing is that even though the One is larger it feels like it weighs slightly less. The only real dislike I have is the placement of the power button... kind of wish it was on one of the sides as it takes some finger stretching to get to when holding in one hand.

BTW, I should mention that my wife also got an iPhone 5 yesterday as well and the One just totally puts it to shame IMO. Somehow the screen on the iPhone 5 seems smaller than my old HTC EVO 4G and it definitely doesn't "pop" as much to the eye as the One. I was honestly kind of surprised in the disparity. And for the record I own a Mac Mini, iPad, and MacBook Pro so it's not like I'm anti-Apple or anything, but when it comes to phones I think Android, in particular the One, just eat the iPhone for lunch.
[HTC One Mini] prit444:
Mini version will be useless...
[HTC One Mini] Nokiacrazi:
Lol what makes you say that? HTC One Mini if it is just a smaller HTC One has the potential to be just as successful. That size market is quite large and I imagine would appeal to a lot of people.

My only concern is if they changed the Mini to a plastic body. Hopefully they keep the metal unibody.
[HTC One Mini] ihavoc:
My sister loves the one except she thinks it is too big. Her husband has a one so she has played with it for a while. She was thrilled when I told her a mini was coming out. She is also coming from an iPhone 4s so that could be apart of the size issue.

So the mini has its place but just not for me.
[HTC One Mini] asofd:
Yeah, no thanks. Gladly sticking to my One.
[HTC One Mini] xda2_haseeb:
Plastic pieces are just on front i guess. Rest is a metallic unibody :D
[HTC One Mini] Myrtana:
Phone won't be useless, I want to upgrade my old Desire and this is probably what I'm looking for! I like design, I like it being small (although it's not too "mini", better than big brother). Rumoured specs are fine (especially for Desire owner, I won't play demanding 3D games anyway and it has smaller resolution than One to compensate). Hope to see the price soon.
[HTC One Mini] gpcorolla85:
That's what she said. Lol. :D

On topic, I think the One Mini is a great idea for the consumer that wants premium in a smaller phone. I know my wife would like the One Mini better than the ONE because her hands are small but doesn't want an iPhone.

Sent from my HTC ONE M7
[HTC One Mini] FitAmp:
I have a black HTC one from telus :) got it the day after it came out . only because it was sold out the day it came out ahaha
[HTC One Mini] jonmorris:
The HTC One Mini will be officially announced tomorrow morning and I hear that it no longer has Infrared or NFC??

I know NFC isn't really taking off massively (although some operators are getting up to speed to allow mobile payments, such as EE in the UK that launched Cash On Tap today) but it seems a rather odd thing to take out.

Infrared is perhaps less of an issue. I used it for a while on my HTC One and then realised I preferred to just use my ordinary remote!
[HTC One Mini] Joshnor713:
My issue is, going off of the leaked comparison photos, the Mini is almost the same size as the One, making me say "what's the point?". If it's not at least half the size of the One, don't bother, because consumers are going to look at it and say, for dealing with just a little bigger phone I could have significantly better specs.

On the recessed camera lens discussion, it's beyond me on why this wasn't done on the One. What makes it worse is that they have already addressed this issue with previous models (i.e. Evo LTE). After fixing something, why break it again!? I never used a case before, but now I have to so I'm able to set down my One without worrying about scratching/cracking the camera lens.
[HTC One Mini] jonmorris:
The One mini isn't much smaller so it's an odd name for sure. It is a much lower spec, and intended to be a lot cheaper (to attract more customers) but mini it isn't.

So far the only company that has made a smaller version of its flagship appears to be Sony with the ZR, but that's not widely available.
[HTC One Mini] xda2_haseeb:
HTC One Mini Is Launched !!

Just in case you guys missed it, HTC One mini has been officially launched by HTC :D
[HTC One Mini] TRiBaL1981:
[YOUTUBE]16FGCnUJPZo[/YOUTUBE]
[HTC One Mini] leungalv:
anyone know when / if the black one is coming out for ATT?
[Nook HD, HD+ General] ian619420:
I like nook hd + specs and i can get a 32gb for around 180 dollars i heard nook now has google play store if so, has anyone tried games like gta 3 vice city nova 3 real racing 3 etc high end games dead trigger on nook hd+ can this tablet be a gaming one?
[Nook HD, HD+ General] Alsaya:
Real Racing 3 is running better than on my iPad2
[Nook HD, HD+ General] rushless:
If you update with CM 10.1 and the new gpu drivers Verygreen posted, bigger YES. Especially if you like emulators. For the price, nothing touches it.

Games play fine and emulators like MAME play faster than on a Tegra 3 tablet (I have two to compare with).

This has become my main Android tablet over the Excite 7.7 and TF300.
[Nook HD, HD+ General] jaudio:
Well I don't play a lot of games. I have played Nova 3,Real Racing and riptide. the Nook HD played all 3 games well
[Nook HD, HD+ General] ian619420:
Did nova 3 have the particle/ debris effects falling from sky? and did real racing 3 have sun shining on car?
[Nook HD, HD+ General] jaudio:
no there are no particles on the Nova 3 game. I don't have real racing 3 on the tablet now but I will this afternoon sometime so I'll check.
[Nook HD, HD+ General] ian619420:
yes there is ......................
[Nook HD, HD+ General] jaudio:
where?. I have the Nabi 2 and the HD plus side by side. I see the debris on the Nabi 2 but I don't see the debris, on the HD Plus.
[Nook HD, HD+ General] rushless:
My guess is the HD will play games better than the HD+ since less than half the pixels to push. I have two Tegra 3 tablets (both 720P) to compare with and testing the TF700 that is 1080p.

NOVA, MC3 and 4 all appear to play similar on all tablets, but when things get real busy, the lower res tablets are smoother. Asphalt 7 is a good example of a game that chokes with the HD+ and the TF700. It is obvious both tablets are struggling with the 1080p. The game is not smooth on either the HD+ or TF700, but smooth as butter on the Excite 7.7 and TF300. The iPad 4 is even higher res than the HD+ and TF700, but plays A7 smooth as butter (it should, with the big accelerated GPU in it and A6X cpu cores). Not fair though, since Gameloft creates on iOS and ports to Android.

Game emulators though are a different story, since all play as good or better on the HD+ compared to the Tegra 3 720p tablets. Makes sense since the emulators are scaling to fill the screen and not really pushing 1080p via the GPU. Case in point, MAMEreloaded is actually smoother on the HD+ than my Tegra tablets.

One thing to keep in mind is that the HD+ appears to not like having less than 1 to 2GB of free storage and appears to get more laggy. I noticed this on stock 2.1 as well and with two different HD+ tablets.

All things considered with CM 10.1 and easy modding, the HD+ is a great tablet for the money- even if a few games play slower. The positives IMO far outweigh the few negatives- even as a gaming tablet.

Added: BTW, all gamepads I have tested work fine via bluetooth and response time is fine, even with arcade games in MAMEreloaded and NES.
[Nook HD, HD+ General] 123421342:
I play mine craft at highest settings with no slow downs.
[Nook HD, HD+ General] acam333:
Has anyone tried gangstar Vegas? How does that game run?

Sent from a long time ago, in a galaxy far far away........
[Galaxy Note 8.0 (Tablet) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooti] benattar:
Feedly widget does nothing. Anyone else experiencing similar?
[Galaxy Note 8.0 (Tablet) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooti] Rpatton:
if you read the feedly blog it says the widgets will be back in version 17. its saying app isnt installed when i try to create a feedly widget.

i was searching for what was wrong and thats what i found

http://blog.feedly.com/2013/06/26/quality-2/
[Galaxy Note 8.0 (Tablet) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooti] popy2006:
Also experienced this.

It just show Feedly logo nad nothing happens if you press it.

Its been a while now, hope the fix is comming soon.

cu

pOpY
[Galaxy S 4 General] jlevy73:
To keep Andrei from going crazy with non-development related questions, I've opened the following thread. That way we keep the development thread for development topics and this for general discussion.
[Galaxy S 4 General] cmd512:
Good deal.

First feature request: Fading in/out LEDs! I've pinged the dev for LightFlow, and while he can implement it on a software level, it would be supremely inefficient and probably drain the battery like crazy.
[Galaxy S 4 General] AndreiLux:
Actually that's something which belongs in the dev thread. If anything you can just post on the issue tracker on Github, I've grown vary of XDA.

There's a new TI LED controller so I can't port the old Philips controls from the old phones. I'll rewrite it eventually but I got other things to do now.
[Galaxy S 4 General] cmd512:
Done, posted on Github!
[Galaxy S 4 General] astoncheah:
just got my s4 one day ago. rooted immediately, flashed omega7.0 and the latest perseus. did not touch anything on the u/v in stweak. no o/c as well. but the antutu score is so low 21000+, i thought it at least supposed to be 27000+?

i tried adam kernel, had the same result. is that normal? did i miss anything?
[Galaxy S 4 General] cmd512:
Congrats, you win the award for the first post about useless benchmark scores in this thread.
[Galaxy S 4 General] astoncheah:
thanks for you response. as i mentioned i got it only one day, without touching anything on u/v & o/c. i guess this is considered lower score than the stock one? i merely care about bench mark, i just want to know is this normal? or i need few days to let it settle down? fyi, i tried more than 10 times and it only score between 20k-21k. perhaps you can be kind enough to give me some idea rather than congrats me.
[Galaxy S 4 General] xtacy1:
It is normal for benchmark to be lower than on stock kernel all devices differ. Following the development of this kernel it has been stated that the kernel is not intended for high benchmarks but more for overall stability, smoothness and better battery life.

Benchmarks is just a number and a high benchmark does not always mean your phone is smooth and performs very well under normal user conditions.

Hope this answers your question and should I be mistaken about anything anyone welcome to rectify me on those points.
[Galaxy S 4 General] astoncheah:
i never meant that perseus is running low on benchmark, in fact, it's the highest between chainfire's cfroot, wanam's adam. i tried all these 3 kernel, all score only between 19k-21k. i just wonder if i have accidentally limited my cpu speed? i will do a factory reset and re-test it.

again, i dont or merely care about benchmark, i just care if my s4 is running normally.
[Galaxy S 4 General] jlevy73:
I have kanged Andrei's response with respect to benchmarks.

Originally Posted by AndreiLux

Samsung cheats during benchmarks by enabling a thermal boost mode which raises the throttling temps by 10°C (90° -> 100°C). I disabled the permissions to this. Practical effects is things like Antutu will give lower scores. This is more realistic of actual performance and I will leave it as such. Benchmark freaks can enable the boost mode manually: /sys/class/thermal/thermal_zone0/boost_mode .

The first throttling speed is 1400MHz and that's why it spends a lot of time there during benchmarking.

Effectively, overclocking on this device makes very little sense unless you can achieve more thermal headroom with undervolting. I personally couldn't get over 1.8GHz on random loads, and couldn't get over 1.7GHz on benchmarking (Antutu 31300).

Nevertheless, the option is there for people who want to stick their phones into their freezers. For everybody else, stop being concerned about numbers.

This seems to affect only a rare number of people and I still don't know the cause. Just cycle the screen once and be done with it.
[Galaxy S 4 General] astoncheah:
"This seems to affect only a rare number of people and I still don't know the cause" guess i am one of them:silly:
[Galaxy S 4 General] bala_gamer:
did you guys note the download link for perseus alpha 4 rc1 on andrei github? :D, dont flash it unless you know whats in there

edit: just flashed it (couldnt resist). based on the newer sources it seems, camera works fine with latest cam firmware
[Galaxy S 4 General] vin_eme:
lets wait for Andrei release......build seems to be a release candidate....so its should not be for long.... :)
[Galaxy S 4 General] GSeeker:
Thanks for sharing bro but i'm too stupid to find the link would you mind sharing more please?:victory:

update: found it: deleted. sorry
[Galaxy S 4 General] IIIPowerIII:
I received mine yesterday, rooted, flashed doc rom to remove bloatware, flashed perseus kernel.

I ran a few antutu and I was getting 27-28k without changing any setting.
[Galaxy S 4 General] bala_gamer:
[MENTION=1141092]GSeeker[/MENTION]

Pls remove the link since we dont know the nature of the version or lets wait unitl andrei unveils it.
[Galaxy S 4 General] Xphoid:
:D
[Galaxy S 4 General] astoncheah:
[MENTION=252981]Power[/MENTION], What rom are you running? I suspect it's rom related.

I'm using omega 7, one of the user experienced the same as mine. Going to flash new rom.
[Galaxy S 4 General] HassanM:
With Omega / Perseus, is your camera still working????
[Galaxy S 4 General] jlevy73:
From recovery flash Perseus kernel + Camera Fix https://www.dropbox.com/s/20kyqg154h8w198/camera-ISP-fw.MEAplusFix.zip

Then reboot. Your camera should be working.
[Galaxy S 4 General] HassanM:
Thanks for your help... Plz go thru the images and plz plz advise

By the way I just tried Camera HdR with same settings except changing Max Freq Blank value back to 1.6 ghz (In SetCpu)... Everything was Ok... Probably something to to with SetCpu...
[Galaxy S 4 General] HassanM:
Edit... from the previous post #181
[Galaxy S 4 General] Xphoid:
It seems that your and my default voltage values are same...

And I'm pretty sure that if you CF Benchmark with 1,8-1,9 or maybe even 1,6-1,7GHz max CPU your device will shut down... and either you will need to remove battery or put it on charge to turn it on... don't know if you ever tried... but this is what i get if overvolted freqs... in my case 1,8-1,9 even don't work with default voltage values...

As a brief explanation for what i do;

UVd little cores -25

UVd big cores upto & incl. 1,6GHz -75

UVd 1,7GHz -87,5

1,8GHz -112,5

1,9GHz -87,5

Stopped trying 2,0... never works... I mean through CF Benchmark never works...

on GPU I UV'd -50 all freqs except 700MHz... left it as it is... tough works well like this, I don't use 700 as daily...
[Galaxy S 4 General] farid993:
Thanks guys because it is in update list in Playstore and i had to cancel it every time.
[Galaxy S 4 General] HassanM:
Does UVing effect the overall performance in terms of compromising high performance and benchmarking.. My phone is pretty much OV'd CPU/GPU... U mush have noticed it in the images.. Anyway what do u suggest?? Just wondering does SetCpu overrides the settings in STweaks?? What I mean is if max scaling freq set in Stweaks is 1.6 and the one in SetCpu is 1.7.... Which one of these 2 takes affect???

Thanks....

Thanks...
[Galaxy S 4 General] Xphoid:
I don't think giving more/less energy compromise performance... We need to give right amount of energy as far as i experience to make the device work properly and stable... as i mentioned before, default voltages shuts down my device @ 1,8 & 1,9GHz....

thanks to [MENTION=4745870]mw86[/MENTION] i found my best working values...

and my advice is to adjust in the same concept... BTW i don't use any part of SetCPU... only S-Tweaks and init.d scripts...
[Galaxy S 4 General] xXthelordXx03:
from where do u get those settings and how can i use your settings ????

please answer me
[Galaxy S 4 General] hotheabilly:
Thats my own tweaked voltage and settings. If you want to test it, first step is go to /data/.perseus you'll see default.profile in that folder, rename it to backup.profile in case something goes wrong.

Then if you done that, copy all of the values I posted before, go to /data/.perseus again and open default.profile with root explorer or something like that. Delete all the values inside your default.profile and replace it with my values you copied before. Then save it, reboot and you all way set :)

1700Mhz A15 and 1400Mhz A7 running together with 640Mhz PowerVR SGX.
[Galaxy S 4 General] mw86:
I'll try to explain to the best of my abilities.

-for a given frequency undervolt yes can effect performance and usability and no different than overvoltage. These cpus are so sensitive that even on woth same default table will have chance that for overclock, one may need more or less volt than the next person. Drop too far, add too much and for some just leaving stock volt on overclock mhz can all destabilize a mhz just the same.

-answer on which takes effect I would say the last you applied. Setcpu has the ability to set the max higher than stweaks same as stweaks can ovveride set cpu. Basically last app to set the cpu will be using that mhz. So both can override each other over and over if you were to go back and forth and set a new max in set cpu and again in stweaks.

-to answer the inquiry you originally had I will point out how this cpu scales on ondemand-sec.

Up scale: 250>600>1200>1600

600 is up step level L

1200 is up step level H and High Freq Zone

1600 is max freq blank

Add overclock but leave stock on demand tunables.

250>600>1200>1600>1800

That's with the tunables left stock.

Set max freq zone to same as OC max and scaling changes.

250>600>1200>1800

The issues you had were not caused by these tunables, they only effect scaling.

Therefore the issue you saw was overclock related. 1.8ghz was crashing on you.

So why would setting max freq blank to 1800mhz do that? Well before you said it stable when max freq blank was 1600 stock. You were hitting first 1600mhz on camera open and that must of been enough as it may not have scaled up from there. Now when you changed to max freq blank of 1800mhz, you crashed because it went right from 1200mhz to 1800mhz and the load was too much. Sometimes sudden fast applied loads to cpu can crash a frequency more easier than a gradual load on the cpu at overclock mhz. Example screen on can push cpu hard and reveal some instabilities even a bench sometimes may not show.

Edit: I might as well cover A7 overclock too.

A7 stock scaling into A15 first step.

250>600>1200

That's minimum to up step level L and up step level H / high frequency zone following.

Add A7 overclock but leave stock up step Level L.

250>650/700/750 *fails to step up to A15 1200

The requirements to cluster migrate if I am stating this correctly is it must meet A7 max then step can step to A15 cores and vice versa down step must rest at A15 minimum 800mhz for a cycle before it can cluster migrate to a7. So Up Step Level L is important for it to be set to your A7 max and also is no problem set to a higher value of A7 max than you currently are using. So wether you overclock your a7 max leave up step level the new stock mhz of 750 (1500mhz) and it will scale properly, which is the default now in latest perseus kernel.

Up step level L 750mhz

250>600/650/700/750>1200

Even if the set max A7 is 600 or 750 it will try to run 750mhz and the highest A7 max is applied anyway.

I could be wrong but I think this is the way it handles.
[Galaxy S 4 General] HassanM:
Thanks alot for your help... Its indeed very useful information....
[Galaxy S 4 General] HassanM:
Hi friends...

Im on Omega v10/ Perseus 7.2/Crossbreeder 7/ Xposed.....

I luv listening to music very loud... Ive increased the audio settings using Stweaks.... Ive posted a screenshot of my Stweaks Audio settings...

Recently Ive noticed that when im playing music (JetAudio), music keeps pausing on its own at high volumes... Sometimes it does and sometimes it doesnt... Its very frustrating.... Not sure whats causing it and why???

Has anyone experienced this kinda thing?

Anyway can plz help me fixing this issue...

Thanks in advance....
[Galaxy S 4 General] mw86:
All i could say is maybe your pushing the built in amplifier too far and it's showing signs of failure on those extreme volumes. On smaller boosts I have never had that issue, but haven't had the issue at all before to be honest. Perhaps voltage protection cuts it off when an unsafe load is pushed through the audio amplifier section.
[Galaxy S 4 General] HassanM:
Thanks mate... what do u recommend?
[Galaxy S 4 General] mw86:
Well let's say your adding +8db to the speaker or headphones?!? I would set one to no boost and test for the issues, drop one db till it stops then add speaker boost back test the same way. Consider as another aspect as another user suggested the +db on the equalizers can push thw overall volume on a frequency too high and cause it so there too see if you need to keep one of them just a few db lower to prevent that from happening.
[Galaxy S 4 General] croach246:
Save your ears, turn it down a tad

Lol
[Galaxy S 4 General] mattjgay:
I see there is some display options which i have played with but not got the desired result, anyway to increase auto screen brightness in stweaks?

I find it a bit dull even at +5 on the slider.
[Galaxy S 4 General] HassanM:
Hi friends

Im on Omega v11 / Perseus 7.2 / Crossbreeder 7 / Xposed Installer....

My phone's running perfectly fine and smooth except Im experiencing lag in my Phone Log...

My Contacts ang Messaging dont seem to have it... Theyre both pretty much lag free and smooth...

Can anyone plz shed some light on it???

Thanks
[Galaxy S 4 General] mw86:
None of us know the way you have your phone setup. Could you post a bunch of info of your setup? You can raise your tunables a little to give some boost but it will allow for more battery drain. Are you using any mods or scripts or anything?
[Galaxy S 4 General] HassanM:
Thanks for replying.... By the way what r u referring to as tunables??? I did mention what all I have installed on my phone... I mean certain parameters should I look into?