yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 Software Upgrading] ghagus:
Yes pls. I hope O2 releases this much needed patch upgrade which hopefully fix their inferior product to something that can be useful for day to day use.
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 Software Upgrading] alvinf:
o2 asia romeer

Hi!

I too was looking for it but so far none yet. The next best thing is to use the cooked rom and then reflash the ext rom.

I have a Dopod Blue Angel but i have last updated iMate Arabic ROM with O2 Asia ExtROM and the O2 splash.

Everything looks like an O2 but with updated software.

My Device Info:

Rom ver: 1.31.00 WWE

Rom date: 12/13/04

Radio ver: 1.06.02

Protocol ver: 1337.38

ExtRom ver: 1.12.925 WWE
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] esmX24:
Hello, idk if I'm posting in the right area so please forgive me for any mistakes i made but i have two questions if anyone would kindly answer for me. I recently installed P.A.C Man Rom and for the most part i love it, the only problem i seem to get is the battery life drains pretty quickly & the phone gets a little warm when the screen is on. I don't know if that's normal but I'm wondering if i underclock it would that possibly fix my two problems I'm having and if so could anyone recommend what i should set it to and which is the best governor to use.

Thank You in advance for your guy's help with my newbie questions lol
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] IXChicharitoXI:
You could try another kernal but it won't help cause we don't know what exactly your battery is.

I suggest going on Google and type, "Betterbatterystats xda" on Google and download the latest version. It's an app that tells you about your battery usage in depth so you will see what exactly is killing your battery.

Did you just flash the rom? If you did, wait a few days for everything to settle down. Battery should get better as a day or two progress.

I suggest taking a look at these threads. Plenty of great advice and tips for you to read.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1969741

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2309604
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] DocHoliday77:
Aldo check your baseband. If you are currently on MD5, try using the LJC modem. A few people have reported similar things when using this baseband with CM/AOSP based roms.
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] esmX24:
Thank You for the info. I had just flashed the rom & never signed into the play store yet, so i had no apps. I was messing around in the settings changing launcher options and stuff when i noticed it getting warm
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] esmX24:
I just changed to the modem you mentioned so i'm going to wait and see if that made any difference. Thanks for your help :)
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] DocHoliday77:
No problem. Looking forward to hearing if it helps.
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] IXChicharitoXI:
You do have a playstore right? If I'm not mistaken you need to flash gapps after pacman to get the playstore.
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] esmX24:
Heyy guys sorry it took me so long to re-post. I've been away on vacation & haven't visited xda in a while, but i can confirm changing the modem did help. My device seems to not heat up anymore. Thanks for you help guys i appreciate it :)
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] DocHoliday77:
Anytime! Glad to hear it helped! And thanks for reporting back!
[Oppo Find 5] michiil:
Hey guys,

im trying to build cm on my own but i get an error every time..

target thumb C++: camera-wrapper.msm8960 <= device/oppo/find5/camerawrapper/CameraWrapper.cpp
device/oppo/find5/camerawrapper/CameraWrapper.cpp: In function 'int camera_device_open(const hw_module_t*, char const*, hw_device_t**)':
device/oppo/find5/camerawrapper/CameraWrapper.cpp:553:134: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value [-Wparentheses]
make: *** Keine Regel vorhanden, um das Target »vendor/oppo/find5/proprietary/etc/firmware/dsps.b00«,
benötigt von »/home/michi/290GB/android/system/out/target/product/find5/system/etc/firmware/dsps.b00«, zu erstellen. Schluss.
make: *** Warte auf noch nicht beendete Prozesse...

could someone help me? :confused:

Edit:

okay got it building now.. the problem was the ./extract-files.sh. i pulled the blobs myself and got it working :D
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] LeslieKawiti:
Has anybody got the offline voice control for android 4.1.2+ working, If yes would love to know the rom and how you did it?
[HTC Inspire 4G] Cremnomaniac:
I've got my Inspire rooted and working pretty well, but still S-ON with RADIO: 12.69a.60.29U_26.17.14.11_m. I'm now looking at flashing a new ROM.

After looking at a lot of ROMs, reading about Radios, I've begun to wonder about Radio compatibility. For example the Android Revolution recommends a different Radio than I have. Some ROMs suggest flashing the Inspiremod which also recommends an different Radio.

From reading various threads it is stated clearly that S-OFF is required to "Fastboot Flash" a radio.zip.

banangranola,

and glevitan wrote,

If ROMs/inspiremod recommend other radios and I can't flash a radio s-on, I assume radio performance will suffer.

Given the additional risks associated with Radio flashing I might prefer to avoid it. However, it seems to put a serious limit on the ROMs I can use. What's the alternative? Is there a way to flash radio S-ON?

I was reading about using "fastboot boot recoveryname.img" to flash a ROM without doing the fastboot of Boot.img. Would this work for Radio?

I'm guessing not, but thought I'd ask.
[HTC Inspire 4G] bananagranola:
Try flashing the ROM without flashing the radio. If wifi, bluetooth, data, and all those other fun radio things work fine, don't worry about it. Radio recommendations are merely recommendations, not requirements. Of course, however, if you do notice a performance problem, then you'll need to weigh the decision for yourself. And no, I don't think fastboot flashing the image will work.
[HTC Inspire 4G] Cremnomaniac:
That's what I'll do, just flash it.

One other question about radio-

I've tried to research this but the radio issue is still confusing. With so many ROMs built for the DHD, and I assume configured for Europe, how's that effect use in North America? I've found patches (AGPS patch and inspiremod), but is it the ROM or Radio that determines network protocols?
[HTC Inspire 4G] bananagranola:
I had an I4G, and I used many DHD ROMs without seeing any radio or reception issues. I don't know anything more in-depth than that.
[HTC Inspire 4G] Cremnomaniac:
Well, if I come up with anything I'll post it.

Edit: By the way I flashed my first ROM today. Went smoothly. Been tweaking and testing today. :)
[HTC Inspire 4G] bananagranola:
Welcome to the dark side. Flashoholicism awaits.
[HTC Inspire 4G] Lussardi:
i have the same issue

which do you recommend flashing rom? I'm interested in a jelly bean .. I'm on the stock and the same radio you mentioned in the first post, I have ROOT and CWM and unlocked bootloader

Thanx in advance
[HTC Inspire 4G] Cremnomaniac:
I don't. I don't have the experience, and if you spend a little time reading other posts which ask the SAME question you'll find an answer.

The answer is there are too many, and too many variations to say which is best for you.

Guess you'll just have to do some homework. :cool:

Now that I'm home I have links to ROMs that others have compiled. Good luck.

Development list... ROMs, Kernels and more

DHD Development List: ROMs, Kernels, and More
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] pityful:
Xperia Z or Next Keyboard for cm10.1

Where i can find it? :crying:

:crying:I'm using Haven Droid sorry im new to xda :crying:
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] pityful:
:D

OK thanks i will try thanks btw :D
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] elpin:
Hey guys, just got my S4. Excited about the features and the new S Voice. It tells me it can wake up the phone by voice command which is like totally awesome. You know like in Star Trek they always call the computer to do some stuff for them haha. So I wanted to do the same but it seems you first have to click the home button and then unlock by voice. So it's more like Unlock by voice rather than Wake-up by voice.

Is it possible to make the phone actually waking up by voice without having to touch the home button first?
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] HS™:
Well as of now its not available we myte get in the future but would be battery killer as for that we need to have som modification in kernal which can wake device from sleep with voice if i m not wrong
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] elpin:
I see, thanks.
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jadajada:
Like topic said, when I set the brightness slider to auto, I can drag it from -5 to +5. What is this and how does it affect the autobrightness?I find the phone to be too dark in a lit room and to bright in a dark room. Will dragging it either way make a difference? And what does it do? Is "auto" not "auto"?
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] slig:
Is it really so hard to understand? When brightness is set to auto you can use this slider to make screen more or less bright in the same conditions. Another words if you think that auto brightness sets illumination always too dark you can drag slider right or too bright drag it left. But unfortunately if your screen is too dark in one condition and too bright in another this slider won't help you.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] lavemetoo:
I installed new ROM (signature) and pressed a button in the notification line.

Then a new circle appeared on the left side, which I cannot drag&drop into recycler. Also I do not know what setting it is.

Any help much appreciated.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] lavemetoo:
[solved]

ok, found out, it is a HALO notification and I was able to delete by dragging it to the right down und pull it to the appearing recycler on the top
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] spikey001:
Does anyone know of a kernel for the DHD that has the frandom module support or if not is there maybe a compatible one?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] blacque:
...what this means: "Mount and storage > format /system & format /preload"

does it mean that if i format i will lose every single piece of data on my sd card and internal storage? if so why is this recommended because i imagine it would wipe out the zip that is stored either on external or internal storage, how would i proceed to flash in that situation? is it safe to format mount and storage without worrying about data such as zips and folders that conatin large game files?

please give me a detailed explanation

thanks in advance
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] AA1973:
Mounts and storage

These let you directly format any of these partitions. This should be used with extreme caution as formatting any of these partitions will result in losing all data on them, especially the boot and system partitions. Formatting the system partition will remove your ROM and leave your phone without an operating system unless you restore or flash another one before rebooting your device.

* Okay if you want to flash a new Rom:

format /system > will format everything in /system

* Okay if coming from TW and switch to AOSP/CM:

format /preload > will format everything in /preload

+++++++++!!!!!!! CAUTION!!!!! +++++++++

format /emmc >

format /sdcard >

format /sd-ext >

Those will wipe your internal and external SD.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] deekai:
it will not wipe your whole internal storage or for short your personal files. /preload & /system are just system folders where your phones stores all the system files system apps, etc, just like "Program Files" in you Windows Computer

Hope that helps

So go ahead and wipe clean before flashing a new rom, just make sure you have rooted your phone already and installed a safe kernel...
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] blacque:
Thanks for your help.
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] ghagus:
I just bought the device three weeks ago, and since then i have learned several problems with mine.

1. twice my speaker / microphone do not work, i can make a phone call and connect to the other person, but i cannot hear anything and he cannot hear anything. i tested this on my office phone also. so it seems the speaker and mic just went dead. soft reset fixed it.

2. i use blue tooth handsfree and the sound quality is horrendous. i tried with so many different types of headset, different brands. if the device is close to the headset (around 20 cm) the sound is clear, but as soon as it's out of line of sight, or a bit far (50 cm and beyond) it makes crackling noise.

Mind you i do not have a lot of stuff in my XDA it's pretty much standard, except for one/two games I installed.

Last problem, battery life is TERRIBLE. Probably last me at most two days with moderate usage. One time i forgot to bring my charger home on weekend, and it died, and I could not use it for the whole of Sunday.

My question is, is this the quality of XDA or my device is defective?

thanks.
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] tnsai:
Hmm i also noticed the same thing with mine..(just bought it a few days ago)

i installed a battery meter display and i can see thhat it goes down a few percent in about an hour or so with s ome moderate usage such as playing some games and making calls..

i'm gonna do a stress test and see how long it lasts ono standby
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] ghagus:
For the battery problem, even before I bought it, I had read several reviews on it, and they did mention that battery life on XDA IIs is not very good, I just didn't realize how bad it is.

But for the other problems (speaker & bluetooth), i never expected them to exist at all. Especially not from a 800US$ device.
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] Mikee4fun:
Get use to it the XDA IIs is the biggest piece of crap ever designed. I had one and threw it in the furnace. Buy an XDA IIi. Its faster, better and accually works!!!

Mike
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] numanoids:
Must be nice having money to burn, I appreciate everyone has their own opinions, but personally I find the device rather useful!
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] Mikee4fun:
Usefull? LMAO I couldn't find the XDA IIs usefull if you ask me. Haveing to softboot multiple times. The XDA IIs screen looked like you left the device in a smoking room! All yellow and washed out I thought I was going to puke!!! I paid $800 US for a brick!!! The XDA II was way better. Now that I have a XDA IIi, I would say it tops the chart as the best HTC device to date. The XDA IIi has a brighter screen then the XDA II, it is way faster, and the WIFI works great. Oh I forgot to mention, the bluetooth accually works as well. :D

Mike
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] irblinx:
Extremely rose tinted glasses view on the Xda II from most people on here. If you all cast your minds back you should remember that bluetooth only worked properly when the last ROM update came out (shortly before the lauch of the IIs). No built in wifi, no support for BT handsfree profile, I could go on.

For the record, my old II is the cupboard @ work, with it's ugly sd wifi card stivking out of the top. The IIs is a far better machine, in addition to using one day in, day out myself , I support 15 other users at work, I would never have let them loose with the II without buying a lot of extra software as the WiFi setup for example was only for those in the know!

The general whinging about the screen colour is a joke, most people wouldn't even notice unless it's pointed out.

As for the processor speed increase in the IIi, so what? I've never yet felt the need for more speed! The IIs is still a long way from perfect but as soon as the ROM update is released the only real choice between it and the IIi will be what colour/weight you prefer & whether you ke the keyboard!
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] Mikee4fun:
No support for BT handsfree profile with an XDA II? Are you smoking somthing? Becasue I sure had it and it worked fine for me. And irblinx don't slide the XDA IIs down too much! LMAO :lol: Because all it won't stay in place much longer. Bottom line is the XDA IIs is a pyle!!! The only positive was having WIFI otherwise its a waste of money. And for stating that unless the yellow screen was pointed out to people they wouldn't notice it, well they must be living in a smoke room and had vasoline rubbed in there glasses.

Mike
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] Dirky:
I've had my XDA iis for a few weeks and I am finding it rather "buggy"!

It might almost be bearable if it was only a PDA but the fact it is a phone too, I really cant do with it being unreliable.

I put the new ROM update on it today and it seems to have fixed my problem with the XDA turning on every couple of mins or so when it was

paired with my headset, however I noticed the sound quality on the BT headset was now the worst I had heard it! CRACKLE!!! HISSS!!!!

Poooo!

Has anybody had any sucess getting a refund or swaping it for another phone?

It does not seem to perform as advertised?!

D
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] DaveLFC:
There are as many horror stories going around with the IIi as the IIs, at least the IIs is quad band. Other than the size, lack of keyboard and weight there is little difference. I wavered before buying the IIs after hearing some very bad reports about the IIi.

My mate has a II and is very happy, you are happy with your IIi and others are happy with the IIs. We all have opinions on our phones and you obviously have yours and have made it very clear several times on here.
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] Mikee4fun:
Yes Dave I have :) I am happy you like your XDA IIs.
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] irblinx:
Not sure about your comments on BT there Mike4fun, because whilst the O2 Xda II had support for BT Headset profile (which actually worked properly when O2 released the final ROM!!) it never, to my knowledge, supported handsfree (i.e. BT car kits).

As for the yellow screen, of the 15+ users at work none have ever mentioned discolouration of the screen. I have noticed it but I can compare the II side by side with the IIs and do have the advantage of reading this forum.

For the record, here's my considered opinion of the various models

Xda I:

Pros = wow, a whole new world at the time

Cons = only Dual Band, poor battery life & volatile memory only meant constantly losing data, ariel made it uncomfortable in the pocket. Poor performance as a phone

Xda II:

Pros = No sticky up ariel, tri-band, backup battery allows swapping batteries, vga backpack (leave your laptop behind at last)

Cons = BT support ropey until final ROM release, sound quality from mic during phone calls (only!) terrible

Xda IIs:

Pros = Keyboard (if you like that sort of thing), WM2003SE (portrait or landscape modes, ambassador you're spoiling us!), built in (and easy to use) WiFi, lots of additional BT profiles supported

Cons = size & weight, sound quality from mic during phone calls (only!) terrible, BT support at launch ropey (still not fixed at build 3900), Latest ROM seems to crash more, where's the backpack O2? Yellowy screen (yawn)

Xda IIi:

Pros: Less size and weight than IIs, faster processor

Cons: See IIs, if you really want a keyboard you have to cart an extra bit of kit around

Xda Mini: Not used so I haven't a clue

Let's be honest, none of the models has yet managed to be really useful as a phone, and the O2 Active nonsense is best removed before you even start to try using them. But all in all they have improved model on model, if you preferred the case on the II then the obvious upgrade path is now the IIi, however if you already own a IIs there is absolutely no reason to swap it for a IIi. And when push comes to shove I just prefer black to silver!!

Roll on the III, IV etc so we can once again pick our favourites and happily slag the others :)
[LG Optimus 4X HD] zaro143:
Hello 4x owners,

Below is the link for the camera app of 4.3 i have tested it with 4x no root required working fine. photosphere not working it seems!!!!

http://android.hdblog.it/2013/06/27...e-galleria-di-ones4-google-edition-per-tutti/
[LG Optimus 4X HD] alberteske:
with photosphere working

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2063406&page=576

and direct link:

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_fGBfBq-dl2M21QVk5Eb0JDQ0E/preview
[LG Optimus 4X HD] SnXo:
Photosphere is working great

Photosphere for me is working on my IceColdJelly thats Based on CM-10.1.0 i´ve implemented the Camera-app. Everything works well with the cam!

greets SnXo
[LG Optimus 4X HD] UncleRipper:
for me work everything!!!

photosphere work like a charm:D

and it is sooo faster than 4.2.2 camera app!
[LG Optimus 4X HD] scarfaceq:
It didn't work for me at first either. Just remove your old camera apk (gallery2.apk) and replace it with the new one. Hope this solves your problem as it solved mine. :)

---------- Post added at 09:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:52 PM ----------

Anyway, thanks for this app! It's great, much better and a lot faster/less laggy than any other stock and with photosphere, it is just awesome! ;) I really love it.
[LG Optimus 4X HD] varadinum:
GREAT

Thanks

My approach:

system - app - delete gallery2 apk - camera 4.3 apk insert - reboot - 4.3 camera apk install from external sd card - done.

CM 10.1 SlimBean+Kernel Optimus Prime 1.9

LG-P880 mit Tapatalk
[LG Optimus 4X HD] AlderCass:
So what's new about the 4.3 camera? The interface looks the same in the screenshots I've seen, is it just performance improvements?
[LG Optimus 4X HD] varadinum:
Performance is better.First does the photosphere.

(For me, previously, the photosphere is not working.)
[LG Optimus 4X HD] masmoe:
Work like charm following your approach :good:
[LG Optimus 4X HD] UncleRipper:
little question here:

why in my p880 i have the exposure settings -1 0 +1

in my galaxy nexus they are +3 +2 +1 0 -1 -2 -3 ?

its software related or are hardware sensor related?

can someone answer me?
[LG Optimus 4X HD] brunek:
In root explorer I dont have gallery2 apk. I have cameraapp3.akp and camerapp3.odex..:confused: I`m on JB stock,rooted..
[LG Optimus 4X HD] Dadovvv:
Is there any way to fix FC on photosphere, stock v20a with root?
[LG Optimus 4X HD] Adam77Root:
Photosphere doesn't work on 4.1.X and below.
[LG Optimus 4X HD] Flying_Bear:
use the camera ported from nexus4, it has photosphere aswell, which works properly ;)
[LG Optimus 4X HD] Dadovvv:
are u sure ? ? Because i tried this apk with 2 devices and everything works perfect including photosphera (samsung galaxy s3 mini android 4.1.2 , samsung galaxy s2 android 4.1.2) only on LG i get FC
[LG Optimus 4X HD] kdeuley:
All is working well on XenonHD
[LG Optimus 4X HD] Flying_Bear:
I know hox has issues as well
[LG Optimus 4X HD] UncleRipper:
little question here:

why in my p880 i have the exposure values -1 0 +1

in my galaxy nexus they are +3 +2 +1 0 -1 -2 -3 ?

its software related or are hardware sensor related?:confused:

can someone answer me?:confused:
[LG Optimus 4X HD] Flying_Bear:
it's not just you, i have the same selection. also, there is no hdr option in this camera app for me, while it's there for some other devices. my guess is, the app just misreads what our device is capable of. no way to fix it, afaik.
[LG Optimus 4X HD] sPEADy:
[MENTION=3506654]Flying_Bear[/MENTION]

Where can I get this does it work with latest CM 10.1?

I did try to search but no success.

Thank you.

Like what I said hit " Thanks" Button.
[LG Optimus 4X HD] Flying_Bear:
4.3 camera, this one, should work on cm10.1. if you have problems, delete gallery2.apk (or rename it) from system/app, then try installing.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2182850&highlight=photosphere

and here is photosphere camera from nexus4, which has working photosphere for our jb 4.1.2 20x official releases ;)
[LG Optimus 4X HD] sPEADy:
I was searching here in Themes in Apps :mad:

Thanks for the quick reply though.
[LG Optimus 4X HD] Adam77Root:
Just checked. You are right. It indeed works on 4.1.

Sent from my LG-P880
[LG Optimus 4X HD] Dadovvv:
Can u find a way to fix FC on our device with stock v20 rooted? pls :)