yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[One (M7) Android Development] expertzero1:
It depends on the radios. Probably poor signal thus 2 bar. Doesn't connect. If it detects a higher signal, it will connect to let.
[One (M7) Android Development] syaoran68:
Yea I flashed the new 3250.20 radio. Seems to get slightly worse signal for me on hspap so I swapped back to a 3250.13. Wierdly both end in 04L so I'm not sure what the difference is. The 3250.20 is a TMOUS radio while the 3250.13 is a WWE radio. O well. The phone is finally working good with the settings I have now so. I'm not going to play with it. Maybe when the new ViperONE comes out.
[One (M7) Android Development] vvtc:
Does anyone have the build.prop from the new T-Mobile OTA update? I have flashed the new T-Mobile radio (4A.17.3250.20_10.40.1150.04L) that supposedly improves reception and LTE connectivity, but I noticed no difference, it may even be slightly worse.

Maybe T-Mobile tweaked some settings in build.prop?
[One (M7) Android Development] shanedd1123:
I got that radio running on my AT&T HTC one and got much fast download and upload speed on LTE tested with speed test app and also one more bar in my house ...NYC

HTC One GE Convered 2.14.1700.15
[One (M7) Android Development] smartanks:
does anyone have the radio for 2.24.707.3 firmware ?
[One (M7) Android Development] vcdwelt:
Latest T-Mobile US Radio is up :)

--> T-Mobile US 4A.17.3250.20_10.40.1150.04L (flashable Zip)
[One (M7) Android Development] Omegaclawe:
So, I have the HTC J One (Japanese KDDI Au version of the phone(Haha, I get an SD Card)), and I figured I could spread the love by pulling its radio.

...at least, I assume I did it right.

Anyway, here it is for anyone stupid crazy enough to try it:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3153931/radio_firmware.img
[One (M7) Android Development] shanedd1123:
What's the radio number ?

HTC One GE Convered 2.14.1700.15
[One (M7) Android Development] BB88:
I think it's because Rogers tried to force the phone to use the faster networks (LTE > HSPA > GSM/EDGE) and LTE is usually the weakest of all. If you force your phone to be on GSM only, you gets more bars/stronger signal.
[One (M7) Android Development] donmarkoni:
How did you pull it? What commands? I'm asking cause it looks wrong, like you pulled some pretty much empty partition. :confused:
[One (M7) Android Development] kopeko:
i'm new here, a little confused is it ok to flash Radio?

which one should i pick? i dont see "4A.17.3250.14_10.39.1150.04D" on the list, just 04L and im not sure if it works

HTC ONE m7 GSM Thailand

ROM : ARHD 2.0 Google Play edition

version: 4.2.2

Kernel : ElementalX 3.4

Base : 4A.17.3250.14_10.39.1150.04D

Build : 2.14.1700.15
[One (M7) Android Development] jonata:
it's better radio from 2.17 or the new from 4.2.2 ?

ask because in my case before upgrade firmware &radio my conversation was more clean ...

anyone has the same ?

tke for help
[One (M7) Android Development] ElBeaner:
Here is another collection of radios

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2325569
[One (M7) Android Development] cc999:
New ATT radio

There is a new ATT radio just released, will you post?

http://www.androidcentral.com/att-htc-one-receiving-update-enable-new-frequency-bands

CC
[One (M7) Android Development] sluflyer06:
+1 Been looking for it since yesterday :)
[One (M7) Android Development] wzu7:
go here
[One (M7) Android Development] sluflyer06:
Yep, just found it a minute ago. Works well.
[One (M7) Android Development] vcdwelt:
ATT_Radio_4A.17.3250.20_10.40.1150.04L added
[One (M7) Android Development] aamitabh28:
Can someone please tell me steps to flash a radio concisely ?

I have s off and I am supercid

Thanks alot
[One (M7) Android Development] donmarkoni:
Just flash it in recovery. Can't be easier. ;)

RadioUpdate_4A.17.3250.20_10.40.1150.04L.zip (mirror)

BTW, vcdwelt, new T-Mob and ATT radios are the same. Difference in size is from following zeros (at the end of file), which is empty space in partition anyway.
[One (M7) Android Development] ElBeaner:
Any improvements on dl/ul speeds on the new AT&T radio?
[One (M7) Android Development] CheesyNutz:
I have notice a improvement and noticed an improvement in battery

Sent from my METAL PHONE not some plastic phone bloated phone
[One (M7) Android Development] ElBeaner:
Ok so I have a dilemma

Don the file you posted is 21.92MB but the same file on page 1(DEvHost link) is only 21.3MB

Not sure which to use?
[One (M7) Android Development] descenpet:
if it is the same, it won't make a difference.

file size difference on flashable zips usually come from different compression of zip even if the img is exactly the same.
[One (M7) Android Development] ElBeaner:
Ok, now the other question I have is will this enable the LTE 2/5 bands like it says in

http://www.androidcentral.com/att-htc-one-receiving-update-enable-new-frequency-bands

I'm basically a newb when it comes to the package updates and am wondering how a 250mb update = 21.3MB
[One (M7) Android Development] descenpet:
i don't think just the radio will enable band 2 and 5, considering people have been cross flashing radios for a long time and it doesn't change the bands.
[One (M7) Android Development] ElBeaner:
So we have to wait until the update is incorporated into current roms? Jsut wondering cause where I live/work LTE is extremely congested and hoping it might help.

I mean it's sad that I get better speeds on HSPA+ than on LTE
[One (M7) Android Development] descenpet:
roms doesn't change the bands either so it will be either something similar to firmware flashing or you might just have to go back stock and take the ota.
[One (M7) Android Development] ElBeaner:
Was hoping not to have to do that.
[One (M7) Android Development] yeyoeddy:
Does it have a big difference the new ATT radio update here where i am with 3 bars i get 23 to 33mbps download and 13mbps upload. I am now on 4A.17.3250.14_10.39.1150.04L do you guys think I should update or stay with this one im using now?
[One (M7) Android Development] wzu7:
someone got 4.3 GE Radio 4A.18.3263.15_10.38h.1157.04L ?
[One (M7) Android Development] HTC_Phone:
Here's the radio pulled from the Android 4.3 Google Play Edition Dump:

Yes this is a flashable zip ;)

Info: 4A.18.3263.15_10.38h.1157.04L

Link: Here

Flash and enjoy!
[One (M7) Android Development] d3sm0nd:
Will this work on sense roms?
[One (M7) Android Development] donmarkoni:
Seriously??? :eek: Have you read anything on XDA? Do you even have any knowledge about smart phones and Android? :confused:

Of course it works. It's radio module, raw partition image of radio module.
[One (M7) Android Development] maxal:
Hi, do does anyone have a copy of 2.24.401.1 (WWE) firmware radio please.
[One (M7) Android Development] born_fisherman:
Any noticeable differences with the 4.3 radio versus the radio from latest Att update?
[One (M7) Android Development] vcdwelt:
Check first post, 709 should be the same as 401. Will try to verify this. Maybe someone knows better, please answer ;)

--> Radio from 2.24.709.1 base - 4A.17.3250.14_10.39.1150.04L (flashable Zip)

There is no Radio from 4.3 because there is no 4.3 for the One...
[One (M7) Android Development] maxal:
There is no Radio from 4.3 because there is no 4.3 for the One...[/QUOTE]

I think he means the radio that came with the GE 4.3 update for the HTC One

Here http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2390249
[One (M7) Android Development] vcdwelt:
I think he means the radio that came with the GE 4.3 update for the HTC One[/QUOTE]

Oh missed this release. Didn't check my NewsReader Today :D

Ok, willtr to grab the Radio anywhere
[One (M7) Android Development] HTC_Phone:
Here's my post with the latest radio :)

Link
[One (M7) Android Development] daffie:
The new 4.3 GE radio cut my wifi speeds in half :) So it's back to radio version 4A.17.3250.14_10.39.1150.04L for me...
[One (M7) Android Development] mobileman88:
Ouch. Seems ok for me though. What router are you using and which wifi standard are you using? I am ok using g & n
[LG Optimus G (International)] wargreymon89:
Has anyone got the new google camera to work with 13MP or gotten the PhotoSphere to work?

This camera Im talking about: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2341996

Can only select 8MP in the settings and when you start PhotoSphere and align it, nothing happens.

Im using Paranoid Android rom from 26th June and F93 0.6 Kernel, tried with Kite r30 and was same. Anyone had any luck with other roms and/or kernel variations?
[LG Optimus G (International)] Miniricho:
Just downloaded it and had the same problem.

Problem a ui error.
[LG Optimus G (International)] scufutz:
Same here ... when on photossfera galery fc
[LG Optimus G (International)] kimitza:
Well,here we go again.photosphere will not work on non nexus devices.google made it like this.it needs heavy coding to make it work,but it will stop on next update.photosphere worked on our g,on an early cm build by chad,because his kernel is based on a modified nexus4 source.but not anymore.photosphere is the cherry pic from google for the nexus line.

Sent from LG E975 pwd by CM 10.1
[LG Optimus G (International)] wargreymon89:
If you have that then unistall all gallery you have (be sure to backup them) and install new one as a normal app. Then you can launch the PhotoSphere.

But it does work, and it works on many different phones and brands with this camera, so your point is mute. Of course it may be patched out in the future, but I guess only Google developers know when or if that happens.

I wonder if the greyed out camera has to do with why we dont get 13MP.
[LG Optimus G (International)] kimitza:
I watched the thread,this new camera apk does not automatically brings photosphere. Again,i'm gonna quote chadouming,one of the top developers for our g :"if you want photosphere,buy a nexus".there is more than the camera.apk and gallery.apk.you also need to patch the kernel with the necessary lines to make it functional.

End of story.so,unless you are a dev and you know how to make it work,be my guest and go ahead.but any other discussions are useless and unproductive.

Ps,if the camera it's coming from a nexus device,of course we won't have 13mpx,nexus has 8mpx camera.not to mention the kernel. Don't get me wrong,i would love to have photosphere working on g,but repeating same things over and over and opening new threads for nothing is not going to help.

Sent from LG E975 pwd by CM 10.1
[LG Optimus G (International)] wargreymon89:
You clearly have no idea where this new camera is from. It's from HTC one and Samsung gs4 which do have 13mp(the s4). So the camera should handle 13mp. As for photosphere it's not that it's blocked and crashes, it just doesn't take the picture. It may not work for us, but it does work for lots of other phones, so I wanted to rule out it's not PA.

EDIT: I just tested with the stock based korean rom for geeb and it worked with photosphere, still just 8MP though.

EDIT2: Just realized geeb is just 8MP. Guess I will KDZ back and try on E975 stock.

EDIT3: Stock E975 didnt give 13MP either, but you can use PhotoSphere, and you can use both cameras at same time, dont even need root to install.
[LG Optimus G (International)] Widyoist:
I was hoping it would replace the LG camera.it works but iamnot impressed.it is just like Snap Camera HDR.apk..with slightly wider view.
[LG Optimus G (International)] pv2008:
Camera on Chad's CM10.1

Hi,

Since I can't post in the developer thread yet, I hope this is the correct place to ask about Chad's CM10.1 for the LG e975.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2229806 "CM10.1 for Intl Optimus G (E975)"

Does anyone know what is the status of the camera in Chad's CM10.1? I had been using CM10.1 official but decided to try out Chad's version, using the latest nightly cm-10.1-20130709-Unofficial-geehrc_intl.zip. In my case the camera won't focus? Just checking here to see if anyone has similar problems because the posts in that thread seem to suggest the focusing issue has been fixed.

Thanks.
[LG Optimus G (International)] antonio.talamo:
for me work

hello, I have a 975 (italian) model, and I can confirm that photospere work perfectly. The only problem is the 8MP resolution. Is strange becouse my apk is from galaxy s4 that have a 13MP camera. Anyway I'm more than satisfacted to have photospere, and I can confirm too that android camera and LG camera are both installed and both work togheter (same for the gallery!)

bye bye
[LG Optimus G (International)] pv2008:
Hi

Good to know focusing does work! Just curious how you managed to have photosphere working? I thought that is only available on a real Nexus 4?
[LG Optimus G (International)] Luis_D1:
I installed it and it just appeared there as an option. Like HDR.
[LG Optimus G (International)] wargreymon89:
Just install like a normal app apk. Apparently Google edition phones that aren't nexus get photosphere also, which this is from.
[LG Optimus G (International)] lachyzee:
Installs on my Aus E975K CM 10.1.2 after I uninstalled the existing Gallery2 app, but restricted to 8MP. Also photosphere will open, but not take anything or show the scene (sits on "Align to Start").

I have reinstalled the old Gallery too, and the two camera apps seem to sit alongside each other just fine.
[LG Optimus G (International)] wargreymon89:
You have to be on stock for photosphere to work. But it should be fixable for cm if they want and find why.
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] icevapor:
This is the first phone I've owned where I ordered a case. My old phones (6800, Touch pro, touch pro 2, epic 4g... ) never really needed it as they had enough "plastic protection" (bulk) that dropping them didn't really cause much damage.

The more I think about it, the less it seems that a full case would really be necessary or beneficial. So my question, Is a case covering the back of the phone really necessary?

My thoughts on why its NOT:

Most (I would guess 99%) of drops end up hiting corners, not the front or back. Watch as many drop test videos as you want... how many of them drop flat on there back.... and out of those that drop flat on their back... how many land on a rock or something that pushes up past the rim (find one... I couldn't).

There isn't much need to protect on the back of the phone. If I were to drop my phone from head height and it landed flat on its back... on a rock... I would probably only crack the back cover.. which only costs like 3 bucks.

Protection from dirt... not. People like to say that a full back case would protect the phone from dirt. What they forget is that dirt will work its way into the case and small movements between the case and the phone will cause the phone to scratch on that dirt.

Doesn't really protect the camera. The only thing protecting the camera in the rim... which a bumper case has.

Also, I think a lot of the cases out there (the slim tpu cases, excluding the tech21 d30 case) probably don't provide much protection against screen cracking. Screen cracking seems to happen when you have a decent point load on the phone. More solid cases like aluminum bumpers, hard chell cases help distribute the point load to a larger surface area on the phone... causing less damage. Its like getting punched in the gut vs getting punched in the gut covered but a wood board. Either way your body still feels the full force of the blow, just one way the force is distributed over a larger area of your body.

Thoughts?
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] reaeg:
I had the same thought about the bumper and posted a thread asking for bumper recommendations here: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2334648

What I got in response was mostly people ignoring my post and recommending different types of full case. I get the impression that most forum posters don't actually read posts before they reply but merely react to the title.

I agree with you about the bumper providing almost as much protection as a case but I think to keep the screen from cracking you need a soft bumper like TPU at least as an inner layer. If the phone lands on a corner with a hard bumper it will still have a lot of force concentrated in a small area will have no cushioning to dampen the impact.
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] DKYang:
It's not necessary, but it's still possible of something hitting the back case or the back case dropping onto something. You just need to outweigh the pros and cons yourself, then decide what to go with. If I was only worried about my phone being dropped, then I would get the bumper since I'm usually never in a environment with debris all over the ground. But I've had couple instances where things were dropped onto my phone. So I just buy a full case myself.
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] xykosomatik:
The necessity of having any case at all is dictated by your aversion to any inconvenience caused by a momentary ooops moment leading to a cracked screen or dented phone. Repair? Replace? I'd rather prevent my phone getting damaged in the first place.

Tapatalked via Galaxy S4 on Smart LTE
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] norml:
I think bumper/tpu cases in general are more for cosmetics and minor protection. And because of the chincy bezel on the s4, for example, ppl at work who like to put their phones glass side down. As well as protecting the camera and having a more flat back when using it on a desk/table. I myself own the neo hybrid and I don't think they offer any "REALLY GREAT" protection. Something in the middle would be the uag, which I think I will be ordering soon. It has the best of both worlds, IMO. And if you think ur gonna drop ur phone a lot for whatever reasons(clumsiness,blue collar work, or "you just never know"), I would go with a heavy duty full case for maximum protection from spiegen or otterbox.
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] icevapor:
I ordered a couple (http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=42676653&postcount=22) bumpers and should get them soon. I think bumpers aren't the "popular" thing so thats why you didn't get a very good bumper response.

As for tpu for inner layer, most of the aluminum bumpers provide a small tpu layer (very small)... but I don't think its really necessary. A rigid bumper like the aluminum ones will still distribute the force through the 2 sides of the phone if hit in the corner. Its just like my board on the stomach analogy in the OP. There is no soft layer between the wood board and your gut,,, but it doesn't hurt as bad because the load is spread out over a larger space.

The softer inner layer just help absorb the impact... to help not jar internals.

I didn't think about dropping something on my phone, ha. I've never done that. I guess that is a use case...

Every time I've ever dropped my phone, the corners get dinged... even my old old phones that took years of dropping, the front and backs look perfect... the corners look messed up.
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] PoRco1x:
The back is more prone to scratching than the front tbh, and I'd assume that having a rounded off flat back would cause less drops than a bumper with a lip on both sides

The poetic atmosphere case is pretty good, let's you see the back of the phone
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] icevapor:
That could be... but does it matter... a new back cover is only a couple bucks, way cheaper than a pricey case :). That said... I might bet an imitation neo hybrid... cause they make the phone look sweet.

My point of this thread is kinda questioning the untested idea that the whole case provides more protection than the open back.... from falls. You could probably argue that it doesn't based on the low probability of a back hit.
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] reaeg:
That's a very good point.

Personally, I'd change the board analogy slightly. A dropped phone is more like strapping a board to yourself and running into something. In that case, having a layer of something soft between yourself and the board would be a nice bonus. I've always thought the ideal protection would be a rigid outer layer with a soft inner layer for exactly that reason; the outer layer distributes the impact over a large area and the inner layer absorbs that distributed impact.

Another concern I had with the aluminum bumpers was that you have metal directly against the screen which isn't ideal but I saw another user mention adding a layer of neoprene tape in between which could actually give that rigid outer layer, soft inner layer in a bumper that I've been after.

Please post your impressions when you get the bumpers. I'd be especially interested in hearing about the impact on signal performance. I've heard half say they decrease signal strength and half say there's no effect.

---------- Post added at 12:18 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:12 AM ----------

I think a bumper could offer great drop protection if designed well. The heavy duty cases protect the screen with nothing more than a lip. The screen is the most breakable part of the phone so there's not much point in protecting the back more than the screen. A chain is only as strong as its weakest link.
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] Xcor3:
There isn't really any point to make this thread. Its all personal opinions and choice if you want a bumper or full case.
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] icevapor:
The 2 bumpers I ordered look like they have a rubber/plastic barrier in between the aluminum and the phone. Some online show it, some don't.

I'll post infor when I get them.
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] high kick:
i had the same thought process as you. the back cover getting scratched is no big deal, because i can always get a replacement back cover for relatively cheap. the front isn't a concern due to a screen protector. what my biggest worry was the sides getting dinged or scratched. so after using slim cases, i figured i'd get a bumper case and see if liked it better. i bought the roocase from amazon and i liked it a lot (i got the white for my white S4). it looked SO much better in person, too. however, i wound up returning it because it made swiping annoying, because the lip was a little higher and it covered the screen just a little bit more than my slim cases. if that doesn't bother you, i would definitely check out the roocase (it's really cheap and it's free 2-day shipping with amazon prime). as for me, i'm going to maybe check out an aluminum bumper and see if that feels better.
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] pacion:
Alternative option of aluminum bumper for GS4 fabricated by DevilCase.

There is a video on their FB fan page. It seems like they just released bumpers for GS4 in few days ago, but can't find it at Amazon's marketplace yet.

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Devilcase-Aluminum-Alloy-Bumper-Series/448520031891616

Some people discussed their bumpers for HTC One and had some reviews on its product. What do you guys think?

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2316315&highlight=devilcase
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] h311sdr0id:
Just wanted to share the Camera App that I took out of Sammobile's 4.3 Leaked Firmware for the Galaxy S4.

I just installed it regularly on my Odex ROM, and everything seems to work.

Should be the same on Deodex.

It's one APK, but it installs the Camera, and Gallery.

Enjoy.

Credits: Sammobile

Download:

GalleryGoogle.apk
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] jrocc24:
thanks!

awesome been looking for this :laugh:
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] dansan382:
does it give the option to change the storage location? i installed the camera that leaked from the google edition phones but it doesnt have that option.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] jscarano:
+1 Good question. I would like to know too.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] Bizmaniz:
Video doesn't seem to work well, anybody else experiencing the same?
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] HwaA18:
+1 on the video
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] Mayze23:
+1 Video is borked but photosohere works perfectly!
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] Tada10:
Wow you guys really have up your video recording capability for photo sphere?

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S4
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] bucklyv:
... Not giving it up, just loading both cameras and galleries and using the ome that works the best for the situation.

I loaded this on CleanROM 1.5 R2 and it is perfect... though video is not as good as the stock camera.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] Mayze23:
Still have TW video recording. I'll only use the 4.3 camera for photosphere.