yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] idrozd:
Good your build cm-10.1, [MENTION=2588207]kalpik[/MENTION], thx.

If possible - do not leave, please assembling this them.

And look, please, if entered into your latest build of 10.1 (23.09.2013) patch latest 'Android os battery drain ' commit?

Thank you.

Good luck.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kalpik:
The latest build has that commit.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] CRXed:
Yes and for me, Android OS dropped to place 4 instead of always being on top! :good:

[MENTION=2588207]kalpik[/MENTION] No need to setup automated builds of 10.1, as 10.1.3 has just been released and it is the end of the line for 10.1

https://plus.google.com/117962666888533781522/posts/5ZRBXyiER4H
[Galaxy S II Android Development] thorazine74:
Any plans for a final 10.1.3 stable build?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kalpik:
Was planning to do one yesterday, but got really busy, and forgot.. Will do one on Monday for sure :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kalpik:
I assure you there is nothing malicious in my zip. I don't touch the zip, it is generated by the CM build scripts :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] archer797:
Yes you can. Trust me, Kalpik builds are amazing and you won't find the need to go back
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ph3n0mII:
Great work kalpik!

I've been on your builds since you first started posting them :good:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Taranis:
Hi [MENTION=2588207]kalpik[/MENTION],

I have one cherry-pick request: touch buttons backlight off when touching the screen (like in Dorimanx kernel; in CM when you touch the screen, backlight is turning on). Is it possible?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kalpik:
I'm afraid I haven't got that deep into the kernel to port that kind of a change. By cherry pick, I meant picking up CM commits that haven't been merged yet. I'm sorry to disappoint you :(
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Edvin73:
I know that CM devs said that other compilers are just placebo but my setting menu scrolling with the official CM Google compiled is a bit choppy but Linaro toolchain compiled is smooth as silk.:D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] markjamezmark:
What's the difference between Your builds and Infected's build? Just asking., ;)

I asked Infected also.. hehe
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kalpik:
I had answered this question here: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=42962962#post42962962

But now I just looked at how infected is compiling his builds: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=42976693#post42976693 , and he's using the GCC Linaro toolchain, instead of the Android Linaro toolchain. That isn't the best way to compile an Android kernel. Also, just look at the instructions! "Save the file and reboot" lol! This again shows he usually has no idea what he's doing or talking about, you can check his replies in the main CM thread, and you'll get an idea yourself.

Just to state some instances, at first when I started making Linaro compiled builds, he mocked me, and said the official builds are much better, and that I think that "I am bigger than CM gods" if I'm trying to do something different. And now, he's compiling Linaro builds with the wrong toolchain himself lol :p

Then when the fimg commit came, and everybody started getting all the pixelated icons, I revert that commit on my build, and the problem was gone on my builds. Later on, codeworkx reverted the same commit on the official nightly, and infected said that I was just doing a workaround, and codeworkx actually "fixed" the problem, when, in fact we both did the exact same thing! He doesn't understand commits on gerrit either.

Oh well, guess I've already said too much. There are a lot of other instances, rest, you decide :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] markjamezmark:
Thanks for the reply. Now I know.. hehe.. I decided to use your builds now.. :highfive:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] RenanAZ:
Using [MENTION=2588207]kalpik[/MENTION] builds and Gemini app to disable App autoruns i`m having the best battery life since i`ve started flashing nightlies (1 year).

Don`t know if its the "Linaro effect" or something else. Tomorrow i`ll get back to official nightlies and share my findings.

Nevertheless, keep up the builds, Your effort is appreciated :victory::cowboy:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kalpik:
Sure thing! Please report back in case you feel any difference in smoothness and battery life between this build and the official build :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] markjamezmark:
When I'm installing your build, I copied it to cmupdater folder on my SD Card and update it using cmupdater, Is it a good idea? May it cause problems? haha, I just tried it and it works.. :victory:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kalpik:
Sure! You can do that. No harm :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] laca77:
Hello

Can I use other kernels ( DorimanX 9.33 ) with Your build?

Thanks

Laca
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kalpik:
You surely can! But in case DorinamX isn't Linaro compiled, you'll lose most of the benefits :(
[Galaxy S II Android Development] beckzz:
Hey,

i think at least dorimanx 8.33 and 9.33 are compiled with Linaro again...that's what the changelog says..

for me, this is the most stable rom i flashed since mcm stopped working on his CM builds.

I use it with this Siyah-like-Kernel: [KERNEL][05/06] Siyah/CM based kernel with Maliv2/r3p1 video drivers

Only problem i had so far was GPS not working, but wiping cache and dalvik fixed it.

Keep on building!

Grz
[Galaxy S II Android Development] CRXed:
What's the difference between the Android Linaro and the GCC Linaro toolchain?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kalpik:
Android Linaro toolchain is optimized for compiling Android kernels. The GCC Linaro toolchain is generic.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] beckzz:
oh..didn't get this...

so my previous post was wrong? i'm a little confused..

Grz
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kalpik:
No! Your comment was correct. DorimanX does use Linaro, so it's all right :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] CRXed:
After Codeworkx implemented the GERRIT44413 fix for the sensors and now that I am using a Linaro build, I can definitely say that battery on CM10.1 is great and it all feels a little smoother.

(using officiall Samsung 2000mAh battery)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] tugler:
do we have still problems with games? :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] CRXed:
Yes
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Connecter:
Hello!

I need a little bit help. Yesterday I posted my problem with the stock browser in the original CM threat. No one response on it. I think some new line in a CM nightly make a strange bug. (See picture) Can someone check and maybe we find the comment in the update with cause the problem. After you typ something in the url bar the bar get black and don´t disappear.

Settings and trying:

Stock CM browser.

Fullscreen & Pie control in browser

Tested new 27.6 and 26.6 original CM and also kalpik 25.6

THX!

Edit:

--> Don´t know why but NoLED causing the problem.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] liquid64:
[MENTION=2588207]kalpik[/MENTION], do you have a set of instructions on properly installing the Linaro toolchain? I have a sane build environment (on BBQLinux) that I have been testing some builds on my i777. I would like to try building with the Linaro toolchain, but I am not sure how to proceed.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kalpik:
You just need to change the arm toolchain line in build/envsetup.sh. Let me know if you need more detailed instructions :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
Wrongly deleted. Sorry.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kalpik:
That's sad! :(

Hope you get it back soon!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
You have read my post... ;) ****y thing really.... Haven't slept... My head hurts.. :/ damn that user !

Enviado do meu GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II Android Development] markjamezmark:
[MENTION=2588207]kalpik[/MENTION], can you gimme the link where I can find the Changelogs or 'What's New?', on latest builds? I already visited github.com/cyanogenmod but I can't find changelogs/what's new..

Thanks..
[Galaxy S II Android Development] CRXed:
CMXLOG: http://10.1.cmxlog.com/?device=i9100

BBQLOG: http://changelog.bbqdroid.org/#/i9100
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kalpik:
I was slow ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kalpik:
I'm sorry I haven't put much information in the OP. I'm just wayyyyyy too busy these days! Good thing that my buildbot is completely automated, so I don't have to do anything on that front. I'll get to add more information in the OP as soon as I get some breathing space! Till then, I'm hoping I, and others on this thread can answer all queries :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] markjamezmark:
LOL! :laugh: , BTW, lets up your thread..
[Galaxy S II Android Development] CRXed:
I am trying to figure out at what time Jenkins builds the official nightlies.....

In the build.prop I can see

Yours : ro.build.date=Fri Jun 28 06:36:48 IST 2013 = 01:06:48 AM GMT

Official: ro.build.date=Fri Jun 28 00:34:27 PDT 2013 = 07:34:27 AM GMT

Is this correct? Meaning....your build is build 6.5 hours earlier than the official build?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] markjamezmark:
I think official is ahead by 2 hours.. :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] CRXed:
How do you figure that?

Timezones are so confusing :p
[Galaxy S II Android Development] markjamezmark:
IST is ahead of GMT by 5 hours 30 minutes, and PDT is ahead of GMT by 7 hours..

That's why I said that official is ahead by 2 hours, to be exact, it is ahead by 1 hour and 30 minutes, ''IF'' I am not mistaken, hehe. To make sure, let's just wait for Kalpik's answer.. :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] markjamezmark:
I made a wrong guess.. haha :p
[Galaxy S II Android Development] CRXed:
PDT is behind GMT by 7 hours..:laugh:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kalpik:
You were on the right path, just that the build times are also different! You only took account of the timezone difference, but not the build time difference ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] markjamezmark:
ahh, I just forgot to consider build times, haha.. :o

The current time here in Philippines is 7:33pm, June 28..
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Taranis:
Flashed June 28 build yesterday and now I have higher "Android OS" power usage. I did full wipe. I'm always removing unneeded APKs and using good quality apps, so it's rather ROM issue. As far as I remember, this bug was reported recently few times in the official nightlies thread (few nightlies ago). On my previous CM nightly I was using Dorimanx kernel and there was no Android OS bug. Maybe someone has same issue?

About Linaro: I thought that I'll notice some changes and I've noticed within few first minutes after flashing, but now I'm using phone as always (same apps etc.) and I can't find any differences.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] CRXed:
Yeah I can see high Android OS too, but maybe it's kernel related. Better discuss this in the official thread.

Battery life with Linaro is better for me though.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] jgcaap:
Something odd. I was really liking this ROM bit batrery life is not so good for me. I ve been able to beat in many ways battery life time with Samsung ROM and with official night lies. I've decided to test the official to see if was the ROM type.

Also this ROM sometimes GPS doesn't turn on.

If I get some log cats can you help? Thanks

Enviado do meu GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II Android Development] CRXed:
These questions belong in the official thread.

Battery life problems should be checked using BBS or Wakelock Detector, both the official ROM and this ROM have perfect battery life. It's different apps/settings that mess it up.

GPS problems are being discussed on the official thread too.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kalpik:
Sorry guys, I'm *really* busy these days! Getting my house re-painted. Will participate more as soon as I get some time :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] feedtheducks:
Hey OP, AWESOME Rom! This is the best 4.2.2 rom i've used. Currently using the 27th build, its running great. I was on chameleon rom (4.1.2) before this. I do have a noob question, anyone can answer. Would I be able to use the 2.2 Jeboo kernel with this rom, even though this rom is XXMS2? Most probably "no" right?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] laleiz:
No. Jeboo is only for Samsung based roms. ;)

Enviado de meu GT-I9100 usando o Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] funkateer2:
Nothing more to say, we're lucky. Wonderful rom, I really enjoy using my S2 with it. Far far better than official Samsung realise or neatrom( respect). Nightlies are stable and funny. Just enjoy. Kalpik one's are Battery friendly and smoother. So, What else..?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ph3n0mII:
From what I understand, and correct me if I'm wrong about any of this, official nightlies aren't always built every day, they can be 12-24 hours late or more sometimes, so sometimes you get the newer changes 'due to appear in the next official nightly' in kalpik's build, before the official nightly with these changes has been built.

If the changes are already committed to github, but jenkins hasn't built yet, but kalpik has, and a commit gets reverted for whatever reason, after kalpik's build is built, but before the official nightly has been built, then to be inline with the official nightly, kalpik would have to build a 2nd version of his nightly to reflect the last minute changes yeh?

Either way, I initially started downloading kalpik's builds mainly so I didnn't have to wait another 12 hours or so for official nightly to be out.

I always check the upcoming changelog so see what's due in the next official nightly, but not all upcoming changes always make it into official nightly, but with usually kalpik's they do, sometimes even with reverts of commits that shouldn't have made it into official nightly to begin with, as far as i can tell, therefore kalpik's builds are ahead of time compared to nightlies, and usually contain at least a few newer upcoming changes, plus the linaro performance and battery life benefits.

In conclusion, it would still be a good idea to use kalipks builds even without the linaro optimised compiling because they are either likely to contain features or fixes that nightlies don't have yet, or at least you'll be getting an 'identical' copy of the new nightly ahead of everyone else, so you can have bragging rights...

'pfft, still on yesterdays nighty are ya? Im on the next one already" :p
[Galaxy S II Android Development] funkateer2:
I think it's a good idea
[Galaxy S II Android Development] CRXed:
All of the above is true.... sometimes the nightlies fail to build for whatever reason and they are delayed.

...but here you are incorrect.

Like said here: http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=43042768&postcount=59 Kalpiks build is build earlier, meaning that he could miss out on some features that will make it into the official nightly if they are merged at the last minute before official build time.

When you say "not all upcoming changes always make it into official nightly, but with usually kalpik's they do", you are misstaken. Kalpik will build with only the changes already merged, and merged commits will be in the official nightly too.

Kalpik's build doesn't have any change in it that has not made it into the nightlies, because he is not cherrypicking the commits, he juist has an automated build system.

That being said, I love this build!

Just check the times of when commits are merged to make sure they have made it into this build and if not.....there is always a next nightly :p
[Galaxy S II Android Development] jgcaap:
In My case is not the apps. But ill disco ver hehe

Enviado do meu GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ph3n0mII:
Sweet, thanks for clarifying that for me, I like to know things :)

Probably wrong place to ask this, but is there a 'usual' reason why some "to be included in next nightly" things don't make it into the official nightly after they have been successfully merged into the git repository several hours earlier?

I seen quite a few times, especially with a big list of upcoming changes, the top 2+ items on the list don't make it in and get pushed to the "to be included in next nightly" instead.

So my understanding then, is that cm-10.1-20130630-UNOFFICIAL-i9100.zip doesn't include:

Add SMS Middleware layer. (android_frameworks_opt_telephony)

Add SMS Middleware layer. (android_frameworks_base)

rootdir: Set permissions for additional ondemand sysfs nodes (android_system_core)

Fix derp. (android_packages_apps_Settings)

Handle cancellation of the 'enabling PrivacyGuard' alert box. (android_packages_apps_Settings)

Due to my great wishful thinking skills, I just assumed kalpik's build had those extra few :cool:

I guess I got confused when he omitted/reverted the FIMG commits before codeworkx also decided to do :angel:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] CRXed:
I think it depends on what changelog you view. I find this one more correct: http://10.1.cmxlog.com/?device=i9100

30th nightly includes everything, except the last 2 SMS Middleware layer changes. It's not in Kalpik's build either yet, because that is build 6,5 hours earlier.

Yeah that was 1 instance where it was easy to fix something a lot of people did not like, so Kalpik reverted it himself.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Taranis:
Previously I've reported high Android OS power usage bug. That's interesting because I'm able to use phone ~4hours, so battery life is not that bad, despite listed "Android OS" in the stats. :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ph3n0mII:
Yeah i've always used cmxlog, but sometimes i have a quick look on bbqlog out of curiosity aswell, to see what 'under the hood' changes there have been, because alot of nightlies have i9100-specific changes that aren't listed on cmxlog.

Regardless of build timestamp, kalipk's builds, which usually contain the exact same commits, are available many hours before official nightlies are listed on cmxlog so I'm slightly confused again, but it doesnt matter, that doesn't change anything :D

Cheers
[Galaxy S II Android Development] jgcaap:
Faster fix semed to havê helped bit . but not as a Sammy ROM

Enviado do meu GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II Android Development] CRXed:
Well, it's simple: Kalpik builds 6 hours sooner than the nighty. So if a commit is merged withing those 6,5 hours, it's not in his build but will be in the official nightly
[Galaxy S II Android Development] RenanAZ:
GPS Fix

Following what was stated in the CM 10.1 official thread:

Disabled "Wi-fi and Network Location"

Disconnected from Wi-fi;

Disconnected Mobile network;

Entered GPS Test > Settings > Clear AGPS.

Got a GPS fix immediately. (was not expecting that )

Restarted the phone and enabled "Wi-fi and Network Location". Got GPS fix after 13 seconds.

I'm using 06/22 [MENTION=2588207]kalpik[/MENTION] Linaro build. Downloading pure CM 01/07 to test it right now.

[EDIT]

With 07/01 build and Wi-fi and Network Location turned on: Waited more then two minutes and no GPS fix.

Disabled Wi-fi and Network Location, and once more GPS fixed in 12 seconds, 5 meters accuracy.

Hope it helps you guys as well :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ph3n0mII:
http://changelog.bbqdroid.org/#/i9100/ shows blank page for me but http://changelog.bbqdroid.org/#/i9100/next shows results :)

Ah ok thanks CRXed, your'e always helpful :)

So I was right in my initial thinking that kalpik's builds are ahead of nightlies, unless of course something gets merged during the time gap, though even then sometimes they still don't make it into official build, like

Add SMS Middleware layer. (android_frameworks_opt_telephony)

Add SMS Middleware layer. (android_frameworks_base)

didn't make it into official Jun 30th nightly even though they were merged into git repo at 2:01pm on the 30th June(or 4:31pm on cmxlog), which i'm assuming is also before kalpik started buliding his 'daily nightly' ?

I have a feeling i'm wrong about that last bit.

Anyway it doesn't matter and lets not too pedantic, now I have a general sense of things, so thanks heaps.

I probably got even more confused from skim reading on page 6...:angel:

http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html :p

Also, is there anyting interesting about the SabreMod toolchain?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] jgcaap:
Wich linaro versipn is in this ROM?

Enviado do meu GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kalpik:
Android Linaro 4.8, 1306.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ph3n0mII:
3rd jul build is 'holy-crap' fast!

/speechless
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pippoaacc:
What about setting up this rom to be incrementally updated via cyandelta? I'm a great fun of that way of upgrading. [MENTION=2588207]kalpik[/MENTION] The developer of cyandelta says that it is so easy to implement it. Just an advice to make this rom as smart as original cm when it comes to update via mobile data :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kalpik:
Cyandelta only supports official CM as of now :( The moment they add support for other ROMs, I'll add this one there :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kalpik:
The 7th July build has FIMG enabled without any crappy icons! Go ahead and enjoy :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] diddly3000:
What's fimg?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kalpik:
Hardware acceleration for rendering text.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ph3n0mII:
Hey kalipk, any chance you can put a post on here just saying what the last commit to be included in your build is, after every build, or just after every few builds?

So then we know all commits above it on cmxlog didn't make it in.

for example, if todays build contained 'up to and uncluding' "recovery: Always allow the CM release key (android_build)":

cm-10.1-20130704-UNOFFICIAL-i9100.zip includes cmxlog commits up to:

recovery: Always allow the CM release key (android_build)

No big deal, but that woud sure be handy :)

Cheers, love your work:good:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kalpik:
I'm just too busy these days! But I do have that in mind. I'll set up a script to generate changelog and upload it along with the build :)

But yeah, please be patient! Actually, my girlfriend has come on a holiday to meet me. She lives in Amsterdam, and me in India, so we only meet every 6 months, and I try to spend as much time with her as possible :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ph3n0mII:
Cool, I have a lot of patience:angel:

I appreciate that your busy, shame you don't get to see her much, so yes you should spend as much time with her as possible :)

cm-10.1-2013xxxx-UNOFFICIAL-i9100.txt changelog file is a great idea, so each build session will upload a text file with the build.zip and it's md5 to copy.com, so we can decide whether we should download it or maybe wait til the next build, say if theres something in particular we're waiting on for example.

Thanks again kalpik:cowboy:

BTW did you know that google chrome auto-suggests "kalpik" from its dictionary if i misspell it? lolz

Cheers
[Galaxy S II Android Development] CRXed:
I can keep her company, i live in Amsterdam :D:cowboy::p

Have fun you guys!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pippoaacc:
How can I find a control to enable/disable it?

Inviato dal mio GT-I9100 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
you don't find one, because it doesn't exist. its already merged in the CM code. all future builds will have it.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] markjamezmark:
[MENTION=2588207]kalpik[/MENTION], can i have a favor? Can you build this ROM for me to make it faster and to have better battery life..? Thanks! :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kalpik:
The source for that ROM is huge! I'll see if I can get to it :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] markjamezmark:
Thank you.. :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] DvWatt:
Hi !

[MENTION=2588207]kalpik[/MENTION] : thanks for doing that for us ;)

Also , wich Linaro toolchain are you using ? 4.8 or SM 4.9 ? ( or other )
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kalpik:
Linaro Android 4.8.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] DvWatt:
Ok.

Are you going to compile with 4.9 ?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kalpik:
No, because 4.9 isn't a stable release.