yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] d_Schizzo:
Thank you!

Yes, i meant that it is not working.

First time i did a dirty flash, and had let it boot for around 5 min. But it didnt boot up. After that i went back to 09/02. Second time, i downloaded the files again and maked a clean install. But i only get bootloop again.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] m1trand1r:
[MENTION=1228651]fusionjack[/MENTION] might be able to give you hand on this ....:good:

Sent from Android 4.2.2:p
[Galaxy S II Android Development] brampower:
I get a bootloop too. MD5 matches :(
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Brightlenny:
I did a full wipe no bootloops. I changed my i/o schedular to row using trickster mod app if that makes a difference to stability.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] migueldbr:
[MENTION=1077833]infected_[/MENTION] does your S2 heat up when using cm10.1?every rom i tried overheats considerably when compared to stock 4.1.2...is it because there is no support from Samsung for 4.2?it always heats up near the camera(cpu i guess). i have no apps causing wakelocks
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Karpfenhai:
Does this happen right after reboot for about 10 - 15 minutes?

Should be mediascanner then.

Ensure you don't use performance governor.

Tapatalked from my Galaxy SII
[Galaxy S II Android Development] migueldbr:
nope, i have already tried to find what causes the phone to heat up more than when using stock, but there isnt anything there to find...and i already tried to underclock but there wasnt much difference...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] thorazine74:
I don't understand, can you please explain, your 10.1 builds contain only the merged changes according to official changelog or do you also add other commits?

I checked OP and logs are relative to latest nightly, so can we guess these are all included?

IMO 10.1 builds would be much more useful if you would keep your own changelog of what official commits actually make it to a specific build or what others you're adding on your own.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
i'm always bugging him lol.. :) going to spare him this time, about my issue.

we don't know if theres gonna be another RC build of 10.1.3, provably and most certain not.. so i'm not going to brainstorm with this anymore... been 5h straight around this... CM code has changed and the fixes/patches some don't work.... i have to start from scratch, and see which commits i need to merge in to the build environment, so it compiles fine with -O3 again...

so... 10.1.3 RC2 compiled with -O3 is gonna be on stand-by for now. 10.1.3 RC2 compiled with -Os, works perfectly fine. all previous builds were with -Os. also think its the best, or one of the best 10.1 builds so far.... :cowboy:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
check the build/sync date of the build... until that time/date all the commits on the changelogs are included.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ngvhoang96:
how can i turn off mobile broadcast. it keep spam me ><
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Vahooli:
freeze or uninstall via titanium backup or similar apps
[Galaxy S II Android Development] d_Schizzo:
If i understand it right, you wont try again to compile an RC2v2 again? :crying:

But ok, your RC2 is running great so far!:good:

How are the CM10.2 with -O3? Better or worse than -Os?

Maybe its time to switch in the next few days...

Greetz,

schizzo
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
some users reports the ROM its faster with -O3 than -Os... placebo, maybe.. seems the same to me, i even benchmarked it, and -Os was equal or even better than -O3.. i was trying to let users decide which one they want me to compile with...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] m1trand1r:
*cough*

ma8 as I can feel between -Os and -O3 the difference is quite obvious on Slim built by [MENTION=1228651]fusionjack[/MENTION]....not on benches but in actual feeling of smoothness and fluidity of rom itself.....it really feels smoother with -O3 than with -Os

I mean one of the games I like..."Gears"....was unplayable with rom built with -Os flag....it stuck and system became unresponsive and then fc of the game.....with -O3 flag....it's running excellent....:good:....and whole system is more responsive aswell....so I think it's not placebo effect....and i'm talking about Android 4.3 btw:good:

Sent from //SlimBean//Android 4.3//:p:good:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ph3n0mII:
last 4 -Os builds have a noticeable lag just when opening sms app for me, the O3's don't...

Other than that, I can't notice any difference, but I like the concept of things being more optimised anyway.

Probably O3 optimisations only provide noticeable performance improvements in very specific scenarios at best.

The way I see it, performance optimisation can sometimes be compared to opening notepad in windows for example...a 50 billion dollar supercomputer won't do it noticeably faster than an old-but-decent model Pentium 3 PC, as you can't improve upon instantaneousness.

There is always the battery usage aspect to consider however...but once again, perhaps it's difficult to test such subtle differences without specialised software or using highly controlled tests.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] k2vmars:
same here, all micro lags in daily use have disappeared with O3.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
yeah... but we are talking about 4.2.2... :)

4.3 i made 2 builds... one with -Os (v1) and other with -O3 (v2) .... both are online to use..

hadn't got any feedback regarding the build compiled with -O3...

and like i said, it's up to the users decide if they want -Os or -O3 on theirs 4.3/10.2 builds...

but thanks for jumping in an give your opinion.

regards.

edit: lol.. ok suddenly, lots of opinions showed up regarding -O3... :) ok... all future builds are gonna be compiled with -O3. 4.3/10.2... i don't think im going to make another 10.1 unless theres another RC which i doubt...

ps: i was around this when i woke up, so im going to finish what i started... a last try with 10.1, SM 4.9 and -O3... using commits from another repo.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kl0ndike:
May be, you should try another version of GCC to avoid -O3 compilation problems
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
i did... using linaro 4.7.4, it compiles without issues and works flawless the builds, both 10.1 and 10.2 ... 4.8 it had a bug with Google Drive. not be able to create a online txt within the app. FC.

but thats not a bad thought...

going to consider another version of GCC, and see hows things flow.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Mr. Death:
Are there any well known problems with 10.2 at the moment? I'd like to move but I need stable phone for use. And I don't have any problems with 10.1... :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kl0ndike:
hmm, which version you used to compile the last broken CM10.1.3 RC2 v2 build -O3, 4.7.4 or 4.8?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
used SaberMod 4.9, and not linaro's.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Karpfenhai:
Same here, Os seems to be laggy, my vote goes for O3.

Tapatalked from my Galaxy SII
[Galaxy S II Android Development] endstille:
hey experience7,

no offense, i'm following infected_ for longer than this thread and i'm aware of the his usage of linaro gcc-toolchain. ;)

as i quoted, he said he changed something.

as my ssd will arrive tomorrow, and i'll build on my own (at least try) i wonder, what he did change since the last build :confused:

thanks again :highfive:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] FredC94:
I'm using trebuchet :o

Well, I cleared the Trebuchet cache and drawer button is get back ...

ty
[Galaxy S II Android Development] mr_zuff:
Use Nova, you won't go back ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] :
Ah, sorry, my bad :D I thought you'd like to know what's special about that builds :)

But yeah, there's definitely something special :b
[Galaxy S II Android Development] foster_chile:
problem gps video

please whatch video problem build junio 30

.youtube.com/watch?v=YJG3UwcTV1s&feature=youtu.be
[Galaxy S II Android Development] :
You could have explained that instead of making a video. Anyways, this also happens with official CM I guess ;) So that's not a LINARO-specific issue and you could/should head over to the official discussion thread. Don't forget to use the search function there.

Thanks,

experience7
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
test build uploading with new patches for FIMG. check CM main thread for info on the patches (don't have enough time !)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kewinh0727:
Just flashed the test build and viber is still pixelated.

When i use the stock theme all icons are good but not viber.

When i use better bean blue (free) thema more of all icons are pixelated.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
Yeah, same here. Pixelated icons also. Already spoke to [MENTION=5247306]ghepeu[/MENTION] about it.

Enviado do meu GT-I9100, usando o Tapatalk 2.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kewinh0727:
Will u have it removed for the 02 build :)?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
yep. unless ghepeu corrected the patches and they are merged.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
compiling new build ! :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kewinh0727:
A build for today without fimg?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Karpfenhai:
Sorry for sounding noobish, but what exactly are the advantages of fimg beside the fact it's an open source gl driver?

Tapatalked from my Galaxy SII
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
yep. synced at 21:50:41.. :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
codeworkx tried to implement it, and ended up removing it, so i really don't think that is of much importance for our rom, or he would continued and fixed it.

just my thoughts.. :)

PS: nightly ONLINE !

EDiT: @Karpfenhai did you take a look at this two http://xdaforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=624784&d=1308036261 | https://github.com/tom3q/openfimg/wiki ?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kewinh0727:
okay so it is todays nightly update and nothing more to it ? (:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
yes. you can check the changelog in OP to see the changes included :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kewinh0727:
oh yeah hehe :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] endstille:
dear infected_

would you mind, checking my question please? :)

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=43122017&postcount=116

thank you in advance :)

ps: after 48hours i connected my device to power yesterday evening... overnight i lost 10% again and google searvices are at 88% usage...

i wonder what triggered them, just loading my battery :(
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
okay, more feedback regarding the 10.2 -O3 build.

made up my mind.

first things first, gonna ditch the 10.1.3 RC2 -O3 build.... i'm just finishing compiling a 10.1 -O3 build with linaro 4.7.4 and sabermod 4.7.4, because i'm curious to check something out..

then...

focus on properly building 10.2 with -O3 ... :cowboy:

more info soon.

thanks everybody.. :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ngvhoang96:
i try but i can't find it in titanium backup or manager application.. any idea?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kl0ndike:
Titanium Backup => Backup/Restore => find "Cell Broadcasts XXXXXXXX" => Freeze => Reboot your device :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
just got a 10.1.3 RC2 -O3 working build! :D

i used linaro arm-linux-androideabi 4.7.4 20130806 (daily build from linaro's homepage) for the ROM code and sabermod arm-eabi 4.7.4 for the kernel code...

all is working fine!

i'll upload for you guys to test.

its going to be named 10.1.3 RC2 v2 ...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kl0ndike:
Cool, man) And it must be, because 4.7.4 is stable. Let's try :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] d_Schizzo:
Yeah, thats great!! :good:

Will test it when iam back at home:cool:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] aceian:
Do games work on this rom.?

It just fc's on other 4.3 roms I tried.

Thanks

Sent from my GT-i9100
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kl0ndike:
Some 3D games are still incompatible to work on i9100 with an open source ARM drivers used in CM due to the magic difference from Sammy's drivers used on stock ROM's. Samsung driver sources are closed and unavailable for today.

I'm using the Beach Buggy Blitz 3D game to test this issue on CM. "Bug-Buggy", haha))

Anyway, everything works for some time (seconds/minutes) and then totally freezes. Looks like some memory overflow control is used by samsung. No one have much time to debug the whole arm drivers to make a patch, but of course, everything is possible for someday

---------- Post added at 01:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:47 PM ----------

__infected, starting to test your 10.1.3 v2, will reply soon.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
build 10.1.3 RC2 v2 compiled with -O3 flag is ONLINE!

I'll ask you guys to heavily test it, please .. ! i'm doing the same right now, after a full wipe.

really, trow it all at it... need to know if its stable using the daily builds of linaro 4.7.4, to compile with.

thank you for your aid on this little project of ours.. :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
thank you! :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kl0ndike:
10.1.3 RC2 v2 (-o3)

A bit faster comparing to -os compiled. May be animation scroll lagging in some scenarios (placebo?)

No global problems found right now (modem,gps,sms,wifi,deep sleep,camera), no bootloops.

Everything works as usual
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
good, good.. i have no issues so far too.. :good:

that's what i like no ear... :)

going to test now 10.2 with SM 4.9 and SM 4.7.4, compiled with -O3...

i was kind of afraid of using -O3, because more that 3 developers told me -O3 could cause issues... and well, it did to my builds, twice in a month a broken libril because of it. switched to -Os, problem with libril gone.

if SM starts to give issues with 10.2 and -O3, i'll compile both builds (10.1 & 10.2) the same way...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kl0ndike:
They were right, it could, because this flag gives serious changes to the compilation process.

http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/2011/10/10/compiling-with-gcc-o3/

-O1 (basic optimization, best debugging)

-O2 (good optimization, always improves performance)

-O3 (best performance, may regress in some areas).

-Os (Optimize for size. -Os enables all -O2 optimizations that do not typically increase code size. It also performs further optimizations designed to reduce code size.

So, it's dangerous to use this feature on unstable and experimental toolchain like 4.9 because of unpredictable results

Did you ever used O2 mode?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
yes. -O2 and -Os are the default flags of CM. i used to compile that way with linaro.

i'm compiling in this instant 10.2 with -O3, using Saber toolchains, 4.9.0 and 4.7.4, lets see the end result...

with 10.1 i did 3 or 4 builds, and always the damn issue with the bootloops.. lets see if im luckier with 10.2... :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kl0ndike:
Os is the code size reducing, which equals the performance regression anyway.

O3 is primarily aimed optimizing the code speed, at the expense of everything else.

It's better to give the custom opts like --strip-debug, --strip-unneeded to the compromised O2 mode.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
i can make a 10.2 build using those flags, and we could compare results, with default CM build and the -O3 build...

"Normal" CM 10.2 is online at CM servers.

-O3 CM 10.2 is building without errors or break the build, soon it will be done and i'll upload.

Then i can make a -O2 with those extra flags.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] szymko1995:
I'm completely messed up. I don't know which build to use. Too much of options.

Keep working. You are great.

I hope soon we will have one cm 10.1 and 10.2 build.

Currently I don't have time to test, but please do it instead of me.

Wysłane z mojego GT-I9100 przy użyciu Tapatalk 4
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
well, 10.2 20130906 compiled ok, using -O3 and SM 4.9 & SM 4.7.4 ...

time to flash! :D

if everything is ok, i'll upload for further testing.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Brightlenny:
I have to say 10.2 05v2 is awesome very battery friendly still on first battery cycle up time 24 hours and still 46% left. Keep up good work
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
builds 10.1.3 RC2 v2 (-O3 compiled) and build 10.2 20130906 (-O3 compiled also) are both ONLINE!

flash at will !!! :D

and please give feedback! :)

many thanks.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kl0ndike:
I've tried both 10.1 RC2 and 10.1 RC2 v2.

v2 is faster, BUT, subjectively, the first one has better interface fluency
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Karpfenhai:
Thx mate, next turn is Monday for me since I'm on a short vacation trip and the fastest I get is edge...good weekend to you guys.

Tapatalked from my Galaxy SII
[Galaxy S II Android Development] gazdajezda:
10.1v2 - it works without problem, so far. But....with 17.07 Gustavo kernel, i guess this is kind of cheating :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] m1trand1r:
Hey guys....jumping in again....just curious....is anyone using dorimanx kernel with this builds and face "root disabled on reboot bug"?

on 10.2 builds?

Sent from //SlimBean//Android 4.3//:p:good:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] iAnoop:
Does sphere camera work this rom?:confused:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] adam1741:
Look at the unofficial gapps by Banks. He has a photosphere camera zip for 4.3 Roms.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
i tested a few days back dori 9.39v8, dual booting with 10.1 and 10.2 for testing purposes, and all apps that needed root were working ok on 10.1 and 10.2, even after reboot.. so i don't know if its a kernel related issue or ROM.. sorry couldn't be more helpful.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ph3n0mII:
I'm on dori beta v5..not a prob for me, loving it.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Karpfenhai:
I'm on 9.40 v2 and I'm facing the same issue, it's kernel related but I don't care since I don't reboot very often... did you try keep root option in stweaks?

Should be for flashing new Rom but who knows..

Tapatalked from my Galaxy SII
[Galaxy S II Android Development] m1trand1r:
don't be sorry ma8....just tell me....did you enable selinux on your 10.2 builds?

:good:

I found a workaround for this thing:good: (2nd post of [MENTION=1228651]fusionjack[/MENTION]s Slim thread:good:.....do you face "random" theme reset on reboot too?

Sent from //SlimBean//Android 4.3//:p:good:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
yes, its enabled by default, in permissive mode.

and no. theme doesn't reset. tested with theme "Black Infinitum Inverted" 4.6.3, rebooted 3 times, all ok.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ephraim:
Hello, tried this solution but the same problem occurred.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
which build are you trying to flash?

i uploaded two versions of 10.1.3 RC2 (read previous pages) and finished right this instant, 10.2 20130907 ..

try this CWM 6.0.2.8 http://www.mediafire.com/?8uttn1sizc07i2u

flash that tar with Odin and flash via CWM recovery, use one of the builds i told you. don't forget the necessary wipes. more info on OP.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ephraim:
I'll try this one. I was trying to install 10.1.3 RC2. Will report back later :)

---------- Post added at 09:27 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:07 PM ----------

The same problem occurred when i tried your last suggestion. Have u tried those build and successfully installed it? Maybe this problem only persist on my device.:(
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
yes, all builds are working and flashable...

something tells me your are not flashin the tar with CWM via Odin right...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ephraim:
Flashed it through mobile odin :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
Use Odin on Windows OS and flash the CWM recovery tar... Let me know then what happens.

Sent from a i9100, a mobile bad ass machine..!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] m1trand1r:
[MENTION=1077833]infected_[/MENTION]

which CM10.2 is latest?

spoonfeed me with a link please:D...lol...

I have a good test thrill today....so....u know what I mean....-O3:good:

Sent from SlimBean/Android 4.2.2/:p
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
lol :D

here you go:

http://www.mediafire.com/download/0wf50gc9yg2z17g/cm-10.2-20130907-INFECTED-i9100.zip

compiled this morning with -O3 .. :) you can tell by the size of the zip. its 10MB more than the -Os.

take it for a test drive mate, and step hard on the accelerator ..! :cowboy:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] m1trand1r:
damn....it's huge:p....191mb:eek:....more than two slimroms together :D.....hopefully it's as fast as it's big:D

thanks for spoonfeeding me.....hehe....:good:

i'm gonna torture it under dorimanx 9.40.v6 if that matters :D:good:

Sent from SlimBean/Android 4.2.2/:p
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
i would try with stock kernel for a couple hours of heavy usage, just to see how the build handles. CM kernel is a bit different than SlimKernel.

then i would turbo-charge it (dori), and step on the gas .. :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] m1trand1r:
hey....too late:p.....I turbo-charged it straight away.....and....i'm impressed by fluidity on 1st boot.....:good:.....it's really good for CM which is not what I really like due to features lack....but 1st impressions are good from my side.....now if I won't be to lazy i'll modify it as I like.....and bloat it with my stuff.....and new report will follow....:good:

Sent from SlimBean/Android 4.2.2/:p
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
going to make a test drive also on that 9.40v6 .. :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] m1trand1r:
note that dorimanx enables selinux in v6 build...but in rom shows as disabled.....and in reality ....i'm chasing "root disabled bug" on Slim rom which your build doesn't have with dorimanx kernel:good:....so....i'll switch back to slim with hope to debug this thing....:)

Sent from SlimBean/Android 4.2.2/:p
[Galaxy S II Android Development] deepongi:
dind't know about SELinux on dori 9.40v6, but you right, it shows disabled.. and can't activate it. so it means its working on the kernel, but on the ROM shows disabled? :confused:

PS: no root problems here.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] m1trand1r:
well I'm following dorimanx through development so I know.....I even asked him to enable selinux :)

I have apps root on every re-boot with your rom....and if I set it to apps & adb....it resets it to apps only on every re-boot ....that's fine.....:)

about...selinux status....I don't know either why it's disabled....edit: it's disabled coz it's not enabled in 9.40v6....I mixed up something ....lol...:p

Sent from SlimBean/Android 4.2.2/:p
[Galaxy S II Android Development] arksoul:
sorry for the silly question, but can I install it "over" the official version of cm? or I need a full wipe?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] m1trand1r:
I guess you can "dirty" flash....but make backup....just in case if anything goes wrong....and as I felt....latest....CM10.2 which [MENTION=1077833]infected_[/MENTION] linked me to...is very fluid & smooth....so...I recommend that one to give it a spin:good:....I never saw CM so smooth..,ever...:D....I think it's on previous page....:good:

Sent from //SlimBean//Android 4.3//:p:good:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] arksoul:
well, let's do this :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] m1trand1r:
NOW:good::D

Sent from //SlimBean//Android 4.3//:p:good:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] rfrenz:
Did the dirty

Did a dirty flash over the 9/5/13 version of CM 10.2; did a kernel cleaner-upper and immediately installed Dorimanx 9.40. Seems to work like a champ and I even still had the right time after boot. Installed a custom boot animation, rebooted into recovery, rebooted and all is fine but root went back to apps only - not a problem for me. Will advise if phone blows up. Thanks infected, seems like a good solid build.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] a-st:
Hey infected_ ;)

Could you pleeeeease provide a "repo diff" of your CM10.2 -O3 build or tell me which patches are needed? ;)

Thanks dude! :good: