yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tiru.adi13:
Download an app like trickster mod. Settings for all of that should be there.

Sent from my Nexus 4

------------------------------------

Devices:

LG Google Nexus 4 16 GB

Samsung Google Nexus 10 32 GB

Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini ST15i (Retired * Sold)

Nokia C7 (Sold)

HTC TyTn II (Sold)

Motorola RAZR v3 (broken)

Sony Ericsson W705 (broken)

------------------------------------
[LG Optimus G Pro] starteam:
my G Pro is korean F240L,it cannot support EDGE; When I change its GPRS's 02508 to 1 (edge support)by QXDM, cannot succeed

how to make it support EDGE??? F240L 's communication spec:

Cellular:Phone

Cellular:Networks: GSM850, GSM900, GSM1800, GSM1900, UMTS2100 (B1)

Cellular-Data:Links: GPRS, EDGE, UMTS, HSDPA, HSUPA, HSPA+

Cellular;Antenna: Internal antenna

Call_Alert: 72 -chord melody (polyphonic)

Vibrating+Alert: Supported

Speakerphone:: Supported

Phone:Controller: Qualcomm MDM9615M

Secondary+Cellular:Phone

Dual:Cellular_Network-Operation: Selectable cellular module

Secondary-Cellular-Networks: CDMA1800 (BC4), LTE2100 (B1), LTE850 (B5)

Secondary:Cellular-Data+Links: cdmaOne, CDMA2000 1xRTT, CDMA2000 1xEV-DO Rel. 0, CDMA2000 1xEV-DO Rev A, CDMA2000 1xEV-DO Rev B, LTE

Secondary;Cellular-Antenna: Internal antenna

Secondary;Phone;Controller: Qualcomm MDM9615M
[LG Optimus G Pro] Billy Madison:
Yes, it's well known that U+ smartphones don't support EDGE, all of them. You were better bought F240S if you need EDGE support
[LG Optimus G Pro] starteam:
but at present, 240S not support EDGE too.
[Acer Iconia A700 and A510] SnoPoX:
Hello xda users,

I want to know if there is a way to increase the volume of the A701, especially the headphone output (I dont want to stress people around me with the build in speaker)?

Under normal circumstances the volume is great but e.g when travelling by train or plane I sometimes wish the volume would be a little higher, because of the noise from the environment.

I dont want to damage my ears, of course I know that high volume isnt good for health!

My SGS2 and my S+ got a higher volume through a new custom Kernel. Unfortunately there is no custom Kernel for the A701

Some media players can increase the volume of audio, but then it sounds messed up and its of course not systemwide (e.g. emulators etc).

Can anyone help me with this question?

I am running an almost untouched 4.1.1. Stock (Build Acer_AV051_A701_1.028.00_EMEA_DE, Image Acer_AV051_A701_RV05RC08_EMEA_DE) with Unlocked Bootloader and it's rootet.
[Acer Iconia A700 and A510] jamart3d:
Check out "Speaker Boost", ymmv

By omega centauri, works for headphone too.
[Acer Iconia A700 and A510] SnoPoX:
Thank you for your answer, I will give it a try. Sometimes the solution is so easy :D I also read about "AlsaMixer" in the comments, if Speaker Boost doesnt work I will try AlsaMixer.

Thanks a lot! :)
[Acer Iconia A700 and A510] Moscow Desire:
There's an easier method than that.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=43546491#post43546491

You have to be rooted though.

MD
[Acer Iconia A700 and A510] SnoPoX:
Duuuude! I wonder why I didn't find that earlier though I used search... Thanks to both of you :)
[Acer Iconia A700 and A510] Moscow Desire:
Ha Ha, only because I didn't post it till yesterday :laugh::laugh::laugh: Was such a simple edit I didn't see a need to. Sometimes I forget to post things ;)

Now, for a good audio mod, I advise

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2191223

Use the CortexAx with NEON driver

Also, I use the Creative Zen IR samples.

You have to play with the settings, and you'll drop a couple notches in loudness, but the clarity and bass more than makes up for it.

Will probably cook it all into my Rom

Also, if you're running my Rom, I've cooked up a nifty little 30 step volume mod, rather than the 15 step (stock).
[Galaxy S 4 General] xclub_101:
Nlow that the S4 Active i9295 is officially out - should it be added to this forum?

EDIT:

If you feel that a forum for i9295 should exist (either as a separate forum or a sub-forum here or in some other place) PLEASE POST YOUR REQUEST IN THIS THREAD:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1660354
[Galaxy S 4 General] xclub_101:
Oh, and for f**k-sake, if you vote NO can you please at least make a post and explain why? It seems to be the same CPU and cellular hardware as in the i9505 and the remaining differences to i9505 are very small - much smaller than between i9500 and i9505!
[Galaxy S 4 General] tonio155:
The drivers are different between S4 and S4 Active, at least the screen (I am not sure about camera). However, yes, in my opinion should be added to this forum.

If it were up to me, I would create a forum for S4 with S600 (i9505, Active and Google Edition) and a different on for the i9500
[Galaxy S 4 General] sasha007:
No It shouldn't be added .!
[Galaxy S 4 General] dublinz:
What argument are u use as against ? Can you read before post please , second post in particular.... :)

No great difference, much closer to i0505 than 9500 so therefore yes it should be in same thread
[Galaxy S 4 General] spamtrash:
I think that adding another device is brilliant idea.

We have i9500, i9505, duos, let's have some more.

It will give the mods brilliant opportunity for more work related with sorting out posts and the newbies will be more confused having such spread in mods, tweaks. In general, they will have much better possibility to brick their phone.

I already see the future posts: why my I9295 does not have.... or what shall I do if I flashed I9505 ROM into I9295...

Let's have some fun observing this, and let's incorporate one more device to the one which already contains 3... :):)
[Galaxy S 4 General] John Chu:
See how many people are using it.
[Galaxy S 4 General] Mi|enko:
Realistically, the Active, 9500, and 9505 should be broken up. The US Carrier S4's should be merged to the 9505.
[Galaxy S 4 General] xclub_101:
1. Keep your day job, being funny is not your thing.

2. The S3 versions are spread among like 10+ forums and there are still plenty of confused posters.

3. You will still absolutely f**k things if you write stuff from i9500 on i9505, so according to your "logic" the current status is already wrong.
[Galaxy S 4 General] xclub_101:
This definitely has some better logic.

On the other hand I really don't know what is the general mod position related to so many separate forums.
[Galaxy S 4 General] spamtrash:
1. I'm not intending to take yours, so cool down

2. So what? This forum shall follow bad example bcs of that?

3. See the post above yours.
[Galaxy S 4 General] sorg:
That's good idea.

I don't see a reason to merge I9500 and I9505 - they are totally different phones. I9500 is much closer to I9300 than I9505.

From other side i don't understand why US versions have separate forums while they are 99% the same as I9505. Even ROMs are interchangeable (with little to none exceptions).

SoC should be taken in account while deciding how to group devices.

I really don't see a logic of S4 forum divisions!

from my point of view there should be following forums:

1) GT-I9500 + GT-I9502 + SHV-E300

2) GT-I9505 + All US variants

3) Probably I9295 should have separate forum
[Galaxy S 4 General] 1337RYoN:
This is how I'd classify if the decisions were up to me

Galaxy S4 Main Forum

-- Galaxy S4 I9500

---- All the sub fora (Dev, themes etc)

-- Galaxy S4 I9505 & I9505G

---- All the sub fora

-- Galaxy S4 Zoom

---- Sub fora

-- Galaxy S4 Active (depending on drivers, might be merged with I9500)

---- Sub fora

-- Galaxy S4 LTE-A

---- Sub fora

-- Galaxy S4 Mini

----Sub fora

Blame Samsung for releasing 7(!!!!) different versions of the same phone. This seems to be the most reasonable way to classify it as some vary slightly (I9505 and I9505G) while some have massive differences in hardware (LTE-A and Zoom)

Honestly, I don't think there's a simple way of classifying this. First place owners of the Active and Zoom are gonna look is the Galaxy S4 forum on xda. That's where the fora for the different variations have to be, I suppose. (Now we'll have to have sub-sub-fora!) [MENTION=4184142]Jonny[/MENTION]
[Galaxy S 4 General] Jonny:
^This. Samsung releasing this many variants is an absolute joke IMO.

As for the restructuring that was proposed, there is a thread in General Discussion > About XDA-Developers.com for new device forum/subforum requests which is monitored by svetius and some senior mods who pass the requests up to the admins. I suggest posting your proposal there ;)
[Galaxy S 4 General] 1337RYoN:
Thanks, I'll post my suggestion there.

The two original variants were acceptable enough, as different regions occasionally have different hardware. It started getting simply ridiculous from Active and now the LTE-A version is pissing many S4 users off.

I like Samsung but their quantity over quality' attitude towards products coupled with their monotonous design are really beginning to get to me.

I'm not saying their products are crap but they don't seem to be doing enough to distinguish their non-flagships from other devices and even among their own products. Just look at the number of devices released from 2012-2013, I think that's even more than the number of products Apple has in total.

Samsung Y U DO THIS ?! :banghead::mad:
[Galaxy S 4 General] LeJolly:
LTE-A is only for Koreans, so I don't sed the problem in that.

I'd like an S4 Active, BUT IT HAS NO ROOT METHODS NOR CUSTOM ROMS AND IT MOST LIKELY WILL NEVER GET THE LATTER (at least not stable CM/PA/AOKP).

So as you said, Samsung Y U DO DIS?!?
[Galaxy S 4 General] 1337RYoN:
Yes, the E330S is exclusive to Korean carriers. However, do you really think that they won't be releasing an international version soon? One equipped with the S800?

It may not be as soon as a couple of months, but it is definitely coming sooner or later.
[Galaxy S 4 General] LeJolly:
Maybe :/ I'm just going to get Nexus 5 and be done with it!
[Galaxy S 4 General] The-Dark-Knight:
Disagree. Looked for an S4 Active/ i9295 Forum. But I'm also ok with sub sub Forums. Imo every device should have their on areas.
[Galaxy S 4 General] timonoj:
I don't mind where you put it, but you SHOULD put it somewhere! Right now random posts on the active are growing almost offtopic-like in different subforums, that's not very adequate.
[Galaxy S 4 General] avsquare:
Problem of Samsung releasing too many variants and products this year :laugh:

I think some experience devs who are able to look into the architecture of S4 Active should make the call. If it's essentially the same where the same ROM from S4 is interchangable with S4 Active, then S4 Active can just go to the international I9505 section. If not, I guess a sub forum under international S4 should be in order :good:
[Galaxy S 4 General] timonoj:
Camera hardware and screen controller should be different drivers already, so I don't think ROMs will be compatible. It's their call, but I believe on an independent subforum.
[Galaxy S 4 General] axelpix:
general forum structure required

It's not just the question of adding the S4 active or not. I think that all the S4 doghter phones should find their place.

Galaxy S4 (main forum)

with these sub forums:

- GT-I9505 (all Snapdragon 600 variants - european open, Google, american carriers)

- GT-I9500 (Exynos variants)

- GT-I???? (Snapdragon 800 variant)

- GT-I9295 (S4 active)

- GT-I9195 (S4 mini)

- GT-I???? (S4 Zoom)

- GT-I???? ...what might come later

Under each device section we could have the relevant sub sections and nobody will mix between incompatible devices.
[Galaxy S 4 General] nephridium:
I agree, devices that differ in hardware should get their own subforums so device specific firmwares and topics can be posted there and don't clog up the "main" S4 section. The devices may be named similarly by Samsung, but that's likely rather due to marketing than technical reasons.

Case in point, the S4 Active has a different screen, camera setup etc. It's essentially a different phone that requires its own firmwares, cases... Same goes for the Camera, the Mini and any other upcoming models. Only reason it should still be a subforum of the SGS4 subforum is that many people will probably drop by there first while searching for topics on their "S4".
[Galaxy S 4 General] apd:
I agree that it needs a subforum to s4 but because of its essentially the same phone as the 9505. Hopefully all we will need to do is learn how to modify the screen and camera drivers and then use 9505 roms.

Also a subforum will help development and we desperately need a custom recovery (for which again we just need the screen drivers)
[Galaxy S 4 General] GreenBot:
+1

Just Got a I9295. It looks wonderful. Definitely should get added to the great xda family!
[Galaxy S 4 General] txingu:
In my opinion, all the s4 family should be added into the S4 forum. With different sections for all.

All are S4 phones, different hardware, but all are S4 phones.
[Galaxy S 4 General] timonoj:
Any updates on this? Did anyone contact the mods?
[Galaxy S 4 General] xclub_101:
Well, EVERYONE should vote in the special thread that is linked in my top post. After you add your vote there and after a week or so you see nothing changed then you should just send a PM to one of the mods - apparently everything is done only when enough requests for it are posted!
[Galaxy S 4 General] skrapi:
If we start adding every single Galaxy S4 into this Forum we are going to have loads of confused people trying to figure out where to go... Samsung are a bunch of idiots with what they are doing, bringing the same phone out for different purposes. 1 phone that does all of what they are trying to achieve is enough.

I think it will just be a pain looking for what you want on here.
[Galaxy S 4 General] aurelm:
If we don't it's going to be even more confusing and people will flash the wrong stuff on the wrong device.

There should be a forum with galaxy s4 and subforums for all vriations (30 or whatever number is going to be soon).

Yes, the active should be added as a forum as we now have the first root and the first cwm.
[Galaxy S 4 General] timonoj:
Yeah, we can all agree it´s a piece of crap to have 7 phones under the same branding. But just making a single forum for the 7 of them is even crappier, for people to try to figure which ROM applies to them, or which news are really for their model. we DO NEED subforums for each model.
[Galaxy S 4 General] timonoj:
It seems we'll be having some good news...upcoming CM support:

http://forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/75768-galaxy-s4-active-i9295-incoming-soon/
[Galaxy S 4 General] DannySchaukens:
Got also i9295.

Danny Schaukens Service. Grtz from Belgium!
[Galaxy S 4 General] timonoj:
Please then go ask for a specific dedicated forum on this thread:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1660354
[Galaxy S 4 General] Epsylon3:
I posted this on cm forum yes. UPS delivery Monday

But, i heard there are also variants of the S4 active (AT&T seems to use another ref with some other LTE bands and a locked bootloader, not sure yet)

Envoyé depuis mon GT-I9103 (CM 10.2)
[Galaxy S 4 General] bouncy:
i own one so yes
[Galaxy S 4 General] Epsylon3:
I got it :) already tried to flash a cm jactive 10.2 build

But without success.. only the recovery is ready to be flashed from sources. I need to enumerate the required vendor blobs lib/hw etc...
[Galaxy S 4 General] timonoj:
So it turns out, there´s finally a full forum for the S4 Active!

http://xdaforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2463
[Galaxy S 4 General] m0e_03:
what about s4 with snapdragon 800 processor (the i9506)? o_O"
[Galaxy S 4 General] aragonit:
Even if it has very similar hardware, the internals seem to differ enough to prevent devs from making working ROMs.

Camera is definitely different, other parts are likely to be incompatible too.

If it is added to the forum, the SGH-I537, which has totally different problems, would need to have it's own part.
[Xperia Tablet Z Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] snorfu:
hi folks,

does anybody know if there will be a similar mehtod to unlock the bootloader like s-off for htc phones? i really want to open the bootloader through the sony site but i really worry about warranty...i know that damages, e.g. display defect still is covered by warranty but i don´t trust sony...
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] Waelhh90:
man !

just i flash it with CMW?
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] Dmitry Budnikov:
Installation aborted

Hi,

installation has been aborted by installing via CWM.

SXP, JB Moonbreaker 3.0, Phantom kernel 1.1.0a, 4.2.A.1.100.
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] minello09:
it seems to work. i made a test before with speednet app and it showed like 6-7 mb speed. After tweak 8-8,3
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] Dmitry Budnikov:
How?

How did you do it? CWM? I even can't find the sysctl.conf file at the system/etc way...
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] .:S!NA:.:
Could you give a detailed explanation?
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] C00ldUdE8655:
yup or you could move it to system/etc with rw-r--r-- permissions
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] C00ldUdE8655:
hmm seems error in creating in zip sry for it

other method is you can extract zip an move sysctl.cfg to system/etc with correct permissions:good:
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] C00ldUdE8655:
thxx:good::laugh:
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] C00ldUdE8655:
you just need to extract the zip n place sysctl.cfg to system/etc with corect permisions n njoy fastest internet
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] Pandemic:
[MENTION=5284952]C00ldUdE8655[/MENTION]

Can you use edit button and do you know what i mean?

You spam man, 4 replies after eachother is spam ! You can use cut and copy;)

:::[ Pandemic ..:: JB MoonBreakers 4 Ever :.

Sent From My Xperia P !! Which Old Dinky Toy Device Else !!
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] $aMeUL l@ZeR:
workeed for me from 6.8 mbps to 7.6 mbps

yipeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

keep it up
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] lebartman:
You take so much of your free time to moderate those forums, please ask to be in that list, so that it will be official.:good:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lK5rP103OL3StU3q9iqwX9LU_k8XABeSQIAT3EHCqgM/edit?hl=en_GB&authkey=CIWz1JkM#
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] Pandemic:
Yeah indeed [MENTION=2081125]lebartman[/MENTION]

but im not an RC anymore so i have no chance :(:(
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] Encang_Rojali:
Good tasted :rolleyes:

Sent From C6603 Using xda premium
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] Pandemic:
why 2 threads with kinda same thing??

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2334492
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] C00ldUdE8655:
previous 1 didn't. optimizes like did 1. dis is massive 1 hehe bro try dis one itz amazing
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] C00ldUdE8655:
it should b working on all xperiasss try it n post ur review [MENTION]@wasim9283[MENTION]
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] $aMeUL l@ZeR:
yup previous 1 was nt gus as this
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] minello09:
i didn t flash, i only edited the file with text editor end pasting it to etc setting permittions and reeboting.. i didn't have any sysctl.conf file in the folder in any case 3g seems to work better now.
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] $aMeUL l@ZeR:
just place it in system/etc with corect permisions then reboot

i can feel d diffrence itz amazing:good:
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] kudaj316:
its weird i dont have sysctl.conf in system/etc.... i was gonna backup the original but i dont have it there
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] JohnLouise:
there's no sysctl.conf file on fw b.100 on XPU.
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] mousemeat:
Yeah, nope....copied the file there and now internet won't even work....
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] C00ldUdE8655:
as mentioned on first post [MENTION=4807329]olujnap316[/MENTION] you need to move sysctl.cfg in system/etc

i knw dis file is nt located der but hv 2 move it.... :good:
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] C00ldUdE8655:
yea i know [MENTION=4918688]JohnLouise[/MENTION] derz no file named sysctl.cfg u juz need to move extracted file in system/etc **HERE** wid corect permisions
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] C00ldUdE8655:
it wont hapn dis tweaks works on all xperias 2012's:p
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] C00ldUdE8655:
reserved:laugh:
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] $aMeUL l@ZeR:
thnx bro:good:
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] dulehak:
Question

For this I must have init.d and script for activating sysctl.conf file?
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] C00ldUdE8655:
no need just flash the zip...:good:
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] AxperiaU:
Alright, this for some reason reduced my net speed considerably. How do i revert to the original settings?
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] C00ldUdE8655:
[MENTION=4910437]AxperiaU[/MENTION]

ohhkk... you can try reinstalling

or juzz remove it from system/etc:fingers-crossed:
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] AxperiaU:
Thank You, did that already :)
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] constantineV:
Hi everyone I've currently upgraded my galaxy S4 with the latest firmware,updates prior to upgrading i was rooted I was wondering if there is a root available for the latest update which reads on my phone below.

I9505DVUBME4' (Baseband Version) also the Kernel Version is

3.40-768421

se-infra@R0210-01 #1

THU MAY 30 00:56 31 KST 2013

Thanks for any help greatly appreciated.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] najaboy:
For states, it appears you're using an i9505. As such, you should probably ask your question in that device's forum rather than in this one.
[HTC Desire X] ajsiryj:
When the battery is inserted, my Desire X will automatically boot. The bootlogo will appear for ten seconds, and immediately shut off. Then (to my extreme annoyance) the process will begin all over again. And again. And again. Connecting my device to an outlet has no effect, nor taking the battery out for an extended period of time and reinserting it.

I am able to access hboot, but attempting to select anything (literally anything) on the phone results in the device restarting and thus entering the endless boot cycle. My bootloader is locked (HBOOT-1.25.0002, RADIO-1.15.40.04, eMMC-boot); I haven't bothered messing around with my phone. Neither of my computers (Windows 7 and 8) are able to recognise the device whilst in the bootloader. It appears I am missing some drivers. Updating to the latest version of HTC Sync Manager had no effect.

What I find particularly odd is that even when my phone isn't connected to a power source, the orange LED will still glow if the battery is inserted. I noticed this a few days ago when it was functioning properly (except the LED of course), perhaps there's an unlikely connection?

Any suggestions, methods, or other advice for restoring my phone would be sincerely appreciated. I do apologise if I my inquiry is ignorant or a waste of time, I will admit electronics are not my area of expertise.
[HTC Desire X] HellIsCool:
In hboot try to do reset it will clear all your data in phone but your phone will start as i had also faced same problem but after this my phone start..
[HTC Desire X] ReSkid:
Did you try charging your battery for a few hours? Then try restarting.
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] darrellj1988:
i am trying to root my gti9505 and got everything done as it said but wen i try and open superSU it says "there is no SU binary installed, and SuperSU cannot install it. this is a problem" is there anyway i can install a super su binary myself?

can any1 help me wit a solution plz ta
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] eejee:
Download a busybox installer from Play Store and install busybox.

Verstuurd van mijn GT-P5100 met Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] darrellj1988:
Its says it wasnt rioted properly but I can confirm to you that I did the root the right way..

I flashed a custom rom nd it bricked it so I flashed the stock firmware thru odin nd now it says it hasnt been rooted properly! Any ideas?
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] robogo1982:
CF-Root, maybe?
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] eejee:
It is normal to lose root (and custom recovery) after flashing firmware.

Verstuurd van mijn GT-P5100 met Tapatalk
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] darrellj1988:
Wat is CF root?
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] eejee:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2219803

Verstuurd van mijn GT-P5100 met Tapatalk