yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] P a T i L d ^ . ^ b:
Hello

Can XtremeBean V3 be ported the xperia ray ?::laugh::la:laugh:
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Men_in_black007:
Ported!!
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] JovieBrett:
If you want a pure stock based Android, try to flash CM10.1 for your Arc: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2147958

Flash the kernel (boot.img) using Flashtool or you can also use this for flashing kernels and unlocking/relocking bootloader: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1560613

HEY! just forgot something to tell you before you flash custom roms:

Before trying to use any roms, flash this Arc S firmware: https://hotfile.com/dl/167361348/43349db/LT18i_4.1.B.0.587_(1254-2716).ftf.html

to your device using Flashtool.

-It's safe!

-It will increase your System ROM memory to enable installation of JB roms completely.

-EDIT-

Here's a screenshot that will help you to flash the ArcS firmware pack, give credits to him :)

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=24824342&postcount=223
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Marviinn:
How is CM10.1 4.2.2 android running on an Arc? How does it compare to ICS and is it fluent?
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] JovieBrett:
Mmmm... as of now the Build0722: http://legacyxperia.basketbuild.com/index.php?dir=main/cm10.1/anzu/nightlies/

Is just fine, no lags and the bug of random reboots have been fixed ;) (Tested on my friend's Arc) It's much better if you'll partitioned your SD card and have a Link2SD on it :)

-EDIT-

ICS and JB 4.1 is ALOT stable than the JB 4.2 right now cause some parts of camera is not partially working correctly in 4.2 (Sorry I forgot to told u bout that)

Here you can try FreeXperiaProject's CM10 for Anzu: http://www.freexperiaproject.com/

Stable enough for daily use but I think FM Radio is still not working there (Correct me if I'm wrong, not sure about it)
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Marviinn:
Oh ok, might try it then. I'm actually on GB now with Gin2Jellybean. Why would Link2SD make my device faster though? :)
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] JovieBrett:
It's not compulsory, just suggesting if you want 'cause in the line of 2011 Xperia Devices, almost all of these devices has an internal memory of just 320MB and for most users, it is not enough to have that very small capacity of storage so instead of moving apps to SD card (sometimes moving apps to sd card may slow the apps to load at startup) a developer created an app that links and moves all the selected apps to the 2nd partition of the SD card which is Link2SD (available on Playstore)

Guide for partitioning and all about Link2SD: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2142844

Also check my previous post, I've edited and added some details that you might not read :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] xXPr0XNinjaXx:
True Aokp Rom

Based on Aokp milestone

Some apps from me

some tweaks

Nova Launcher

this is version 1 so might not have lot of mods or tweaks

but ill add more in the next versions

Adfree,Cm Kernel

Flash Player

Galaxy s4 ui Sounds :D

:good::good::good::good::good::good:

ScreenShots

Cridts and Thanks

Whole Aokp Team

Baji

and Every developer of aokp Roms :good:

Dont Forget To Thanks Them They Are Awesome!

If u like the rom u can thanks me also i Apriciate it :D

Download http://d-h.st/nlx

Gappshttp://goo.im/gapps/gapps-jb-20130301-signed.zip
[Galaxy S II Android Development] YoUnEs DeX:
thanks

but not screanshote and linke to

Download

Gapps
[Galaxy S II Android Development] xXPr0XNinjaXx:
Soryy guys working on my internet is gone :[ will upload it tommoro with more apps
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Jonny:
Thread closed. Placeholder threads are not allowed. OP please contact me when you have links ready and I'll reopen this thread.

Edit: Thread reopened.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] xXPr0XNinjaXx:
Reserved The Links Have Been Added :DDD
[Galaxy S II Android Development] xXPr0XNinjaXx:
how can i upload them i cant
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ab-samy:
Go to this site: http://imageshack.us/

Sign up and upload your screenshot, you will get direct link of your image and edit your post click on insert image paste your image link save changes. that's it.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] xXPr0XNinjaXx:
Thaaanks Mate I bookmark that site now i can upload more screenshot but now i uploaded them on dropbox thanks ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Christian Nothing:
None of those posted screenshots are working ;)

I suggest you to use the ab-samy's method :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] xXPr0XNinjaXx:
Are you using xda app cause its not showing on xda app but on pc its working fine
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Christian Nothing:
Lol yes :D

is working on Web view .
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] macklalt:
Hey is there a way of porting the Galaxy SIV features like eye tracking and etc? Chinease made it in their clone of SIV so i thought why can't we do it too? :D I am running a N7100 international version.
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] aukhan:
nobody done it so far
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] UtkarshGupta:
No. Tw framework and it's features are closed source. So no.
[myTouch 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] krsboimo0o0o:
I have had this phone for over a year and the power button is getting harder to activate. I also have a nook color, when I plug the nook up it powers on. Is there a way to have something similar on the mt4g? Power on through USB or charge. Thanks.
[myTouch 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] N_otori0us_:
I dunno if it can with ADB. But what if you hold the volume down and power button to get into bootloader. How is you power button failing, can you get me a picture?
[myTouch 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] L473ncy:
Could it be that your flex cable is getting worn out or just not actuating the power properly (ie. like with a microswitch, eventually the "springiness" of the switch won't properly let the microswitch activate) If you don't get what I mean, like the inside housing of this microswitch; http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f8/Microswitch.jpg

Based on this post it seems the mobo flex cable is what depressed an internal switch to turn the device/screen on and off. http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1591388

The last part of your post though, do you mean that you turn off the phone every night and turn it back on the next morning? Does this only happen when the phone is off and it acts normally when turning the screen on and off?
[myTouch 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] krsboimo0o0o:
Well problem solved. I flashed the cwm touch 8.5 I think. Anyways it boots up into recovery when plugged in. I can live with that. I will miss 4xt. Thanks again guys n gals.
[myTouch 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Lka1988:
Forgive me if this sounds ignorant, but is this a common HTC issue? I own a Glacier and an HD7, and I've seen power button issues for both of them.
[myTouch 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] krsboimo0o0o:
Well the issue was pressing the power button would do nothing 95% of the time and 5% would turn the device on. So, problem solved with the cwm touch recovery, except it boots in to recovery mode and is touch sensitive. That's good enough for me though. I just need to be careful when turning the device on.
[myTouch 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jbpanache:
i have the same issue with my phone...power button is completely broken..,

but i managed to map the search key (hardly use this button) with the power button using the button remapper found here (http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=850464)

For reboot, i just connect it to any power outlet and it turns on into CWM touch recovery...

i can live with it until the next nexus..:p
[myTouch 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tuxkamen:
If you feel comfortable opening up the bevel of the phone, you may want to check and see if the pieces of the power switch are still seated properly. I had a similar issue (which I wrote about here) that was entirely due to the pieces of the switch going off-center, making the button less responsive over time and eventually completely useless. The symptom was that the power button seemed to have less and less actuation to it.

Links:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1603616 (Kevininthebox's power button takeapart guide)

My experience with it is at the bottom.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hellpearl:
Siyah-Dorimanx is compatibility ? if so what version is the most suitable... thanks: Confused:
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Paul Blake:
Siyah - latest build

Dorimanx - 8.xx

Send from my SGS2 I9100 with HassanROM and latest DorimanX 8.xx kernel
[Desire HD Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] selengege:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2322603

this tread for xperia z 4.2.2..

i hope any develop can port to dhd..

thanks..
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] Ronv:
Hi,

I f i have an existing contact , and i get a call from him but from a new phone number.

How can i add his new number from the phone list to the existing contact.

Ron
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] jimVmax:
Hi Ron!

If you go into your Call History list and then find the number you want, with your stylus press and hold on the number, it will then give you a drop down menu. The top one Save to Contacts will get you to the contact to save it.

I hope this helps, StayLucky Jim :wink:
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] Ronv:
Jim,

i want to add it to existing contact ,

The only opsion that i get is to create a new contact with the phone number.

Ron
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] Bassey:
Yeah, it's a pain unless you buy one of the phone replacement softwares out there (like phoneplus) that let's you copy the number to the clipboard.

I just do create contact, then copy the number, delete the (almost) blank contact, open up the one I want and paste it in. It's sounds long winded but, in reality, only takes a few seconds. Still more than it should though!

I would recommend getting something like phoneplus if you use it as a phone quite a bit. As a dedicated phone, the XDA's are a bit weak (but, as I rarely use it as a phone, that's not something that bothers me).
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] Ronv:
Thank .I using the phonePlus,

I though there might be a better solution.
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] buchay:
is it so difficult to build a small applicaion or registry entry etc to add a contact to an existing one???

developers???? gurus???????
[Motorola Droid RAZR] Arachnida:
Hello!

Lately I've been suffering from a battery problem, I will explain what happens.

I charge my phone completely and then I start using it... when it hits 30% left, the next drop is 20 instead of 29%. For example... If it takes 3 minutes to go down from 84% to 83%... that's the same time it takes from 30% to 20%.

It also happens when it hits 14%, instead of dropping to 13% it drops to 4%.

How can I fix this? I've been told that it's an issue of flashing too many ROM's

Actual ROM; Carbon 1.7 Stable version

Previous ROM: D-WIZ JBX.

P.S: I've been facing this issue for months now, I think it started with D-WIZ.

Thanks :D
[Motorola Droid RAZR] bazul007:
I am also having these problems yesterday i flashed aokp rom it all went well but today it was showing 70% and as soon as i put the mobile data on it showed 49%
[Motorola Droid RAZR] agustincards14:
I've had the same problem and I cannot seem to find a solution. My battery also INCREASES from about 80% to 100 when I'm charging an almost dead battery
[Motorola Droid RAZR] anurag.dj2u:
Why don't you guys calibrate your battery once . Let me know if it works or not . If not then ill look out for something else.

Please hit the thanks :thumbup: if i ever helped ya !! :D:D
[Motorola Droid RAZR] neo.ank:
How old is your phone.?

Its common for old batteries to incorrectly display battery data. This simply happens because the battd daemon uses the estimation based on checkpoints and voltage of the battery. When the battery gets old, the actual charge stored is less than the reported value and results in wrong calculation by battd.

If your device is pretty old, it is in a sense normal. However if its new then it might be some problem.

PS: The battery calibration is a myth! The /data/system/batterystats.bin file is not related to battery charge/life/status (exactly as Google devs stated earlier).

In case of our Razr, charge the battery to 100% and keep charging for few hours after that. Then disconnect it battd will display correct 99%. That's all you need when changing ROMs or batteries! Do not waste your time on "battery calibration"!
[Motorola Droid RAZR] Arachnida:
I also get the 80% to 100% when charging :(

Well my razr is almost 10 months old!

So there is no way to repair it? :\
[Motorola Droid RAZR] Markos96:
What I usually when I switch ROMs is I will both download battery calibration, and keep the charge at 100% for a couple of hours after. That way there is no doubt that it truly is at 100%, and Battery Calibration can do the job well :) hope this helps!
[Motorola Droid RAZR] neo.ank:
I wouldn't consider it very old. I think in your case it can be fixed. There were some files that needed to be replaced. don't remember it exactly but will look into it.
[Motorola Droid RAZR] thenowherekid:
Mine does this to. Not sure if there are dead battery cells or if its associated with rom.
[Motorola Droid RAZR] r4zrm4xxx:
Having this issue also calibrate don't help me unless I'm doing it wrong..... RAZR maxx
[Motorola Droid RAZR] Arachnida:
Thanks :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] linkin275:
Petition to Samsung and At&t to unlock the bootloader. Please sign the petition, share and pass along.

http://www.change.org/petitions/samsung-usa-at-t-unlock-the-bootloader-of-the-galaxy-s4-sgh-i337-2
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] alphadog00:
Why? Has this been successful with any other phone? I have never seen any evidence that AT&T cares. Samsung designed this way because AT&T wanted it this way, so petitioning Samsung won't matter. The only thing that will matter is not buying from AT&T (or Verizon) in the future.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Thermalwolf:
This. OP I feel your hope and frustration but it won't do much. Samsung just makes the device to how AT&T specifies and AT&T just really doesn't care. Like the one guy said, we just gotta stop buying the service and considering T-Mobile eased on the contracts and didn't lock there boot loader, it won't be that bad.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] lgkahn:
yep not upgrading my s3.. just like I don't support apple with locked down

OS's.. I will not get locked phones from att and will switch when contract is up if they don't get their act together.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] toxicpaulution:
I'd get a nexus if it had replaceable battery and an external sd card :/
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] geoldr:
This.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Shammyh:
Galaxy S4 Google Edition.

Sent from my SGH-I337
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] toxicpaulution:
When a 32gb nexus is $350 and the 32gb GS4 GE Will be around 700 dollars? I'd rather have spent it on two Nexus 4's :) but then again I'd have a stupid smartphone if I got the GE S4 since I'd have all the sensors and nothing to use them with. That sir is a waste.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Shammyh:
And where is it official that the Google Edition will not include any functionality for all the new sensors, etc? You do release that Samsung has the source code right? And as one of Google's closest manufacturing partners.... It's still rather unlikely that they'd ship a $650 flagship phone with all its key features gimped... Right?

I mean, it totally could happen, but I find it rather unlikely that it'll be that much worse than a regular GS4. And before you go on a "it's all baked into TouchJizz therefore it can't work without it" style rant, that's simply not true. Again, Samsung designed the fricking phone, I'm pretty sure they can expose an intelligent interface to their fancy new sensors without the TW framework if they wanted.

Nothing is set in stone yet, but don't assume that these types of questions haven't been thought of, and possible solutions found, by the smart folks at Google and Samsung.

The $$$ on the other hand versus a Nexus 4, is a different question. Clearly the GS4 is a much better phone, but a 2x more expensive phone? Probably not.

Sent from my SGH-I337
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] imitenotbecrazy:
Uhh because a lot of that stuff isn't built into aosp yet?? Same reason why they already said the One Google edition won't use the IR blaster. Its not that Samsung isn't capable of doing it, its that I doubt Google will let them being that its supposed to be stripped down vanilla android. Verizon messed with the galaxy nexus and are rumored to have been discluded from further nexuses because of it. We could also all shut up and stop speculating until it comes out
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] toxicpaulution:
How much is a 16gb unlocked galaxy S4? 625$

http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00BV1NKCW/ref=redir_mdp_mobile

How much is 2 nexus 4's? 600$

https://play.google.com/store/devices/details/Nexus_4_8GB?id=nexus_4_8gb&hl=en

so technically you can get two cheaper for the price of one. And you speak as if I don't think Google could add those features in, I know they made the code. But I also know that they are going to follow the footsteps HTC did when they released their Google edition. Its the lines of Google edition to make it as bone stock as possible. As long as the OS runs with the camera and calling that's what matters to them. Yes maybe down the road Samsung will give an update for the sensors, but that will be down the road. Also the GE won't be the last of the line. When they ship the red,blue,brown, and purple they will be shipped with standard touchwiz.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] kelvinw273:
Only has 26 signatures, I don't think ATT or Samsung will even give this a 2nd thought or even make its way into a meeting agenda at the corporate level.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Shammyh:
It only has 26 signatures because most of us know that there is not sufficient user-base outrage for this practice to change.

The logic is as follows:

Group 1) I'd garner that 70-80% of all AT&T Galaxy S4 owners are unaware of what Linux is, let alone it's relation to their phone. So forget about bootloaders, and signing chains, and stuff like that. It's all greek to them. They just want to browse the web, visit Facebook, and send text messages. If it happens on a slim phone with a big pretty screen, then they're happy.

Group 2) There's maybe another 10-15% who actually understand the underlying concepts of Android/Linux etc, but who have no interest in modifying their phones. Those are techy or semi-techy people, who again, really just want to browse the web, use apps, and have a slim pretty phone.

Group 3) That leaves about 5-10% who actually desire to "modify" anything about their phone, and have any technical ability to do so.

Group 4) Out of that 5-10%, many of those people don't understand the intricacies of the boot process (or signature signing), and just "follow directions closely" to get what they want, and go home happy. That's probably the majority of visitors to XDA, which leaves....

Group 5) At most 5% of all AT&T Galaxy S4 users. These people actually understand how Android/Linux/boot chain process works, at least at a higher level. Don't ask them to read the source code, but they get the general idea.

Group 6) These are the people who actually understand and actually decide/agree to spend their time signing the petition.

Now to be fair, these numbers are as accurate as either the 2004 presidential election results or the number of secret NSA warrants issued every year. Aka, they're not very accurate. But I think you get the picture.

Even in the best case scenario, where you get 100% of Group 5 to sign, and god forbid, maybe even 100% of Group 4, that's still barely enough of a user base for AT&T to even consider your argument. And there's likely no reason they'd acquiesce anyway. While it's a big bummer to us modders, I'm sure there is a reason AT&T chose to go to the trouble of "locking the bootloader". In theory, it's a nice idea if you're selling to, I dunno, the government, or a big corporation... Your sales pitch is: "We use hardware in the phone to prevent modifying, so that when you go visit China, or wherever, we can 100% guarantee that no software bugs were installed in your phone. Secure bootloader means we can guarantee the entire process from boot up, to application loading, meaning your data is secure in our hands." Or some bullsh1t like that. Believe me, the reason at&t did it is for profit, but not to profit by screwing us modders over, to profit by engaging in a sales pitch to a select but profitable group of customers (who aren't you or me).

So long story short, it's a lost cause.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] cotasa:
you have serious problems in math..

by the way, many people could be in the group that "just fallows directions closely" and still would like the bootloader to get unlocked (because someone with knowledge will take that advantage, create roms or whatever and share them with obviously, the "easy instructions to fallow"..
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Shammyh:
Lol, which is what I said... Granted in a rambling way, and duh, I pulled those numbers out of my butt. Which I also alluded to.

Either way, point stands that no petition is gonna change the situation. And that less than 30 people have signed said petition. That part ain't math, or subjective.

And as I also said, there's still the plane option...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] alphadog00:
Even if there were 100K signatures, unless people buy a different product so that the carrier sees it hurting their revenue, they have no incentive.

How many people ditched AT&T to buy the t-mobile version? Not many. So an unlocked boot loader, even with cheaper data plans, is not enough to fuel consumer outrage.

Petitions are meaningless if there are no consequences. If t-mo ever gets better coverage, I may switch, but until then any threat to leave by me is empty. I think AT&T knows that.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] cyrusalmighty:
I signed petition and I sent it to many friends via email to bring attention to the matter. Maybe someone can post in Facebook and any other sites?? Im also considering donation towards bounty for developers who unlock bootloader or alternative methods of adding recovery.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] atari800:
I think what will add weight to this issue is the fact that you cannot do a factory data reset and that KIES complains about the firmware.

Some people with legit issues contacting Samsung for support may be instructed to "power off unit - hold volume down and power on - blah blah blah" which gets you to the android screen with message "cannot boot into normal mode"

Samsung cannot even suggest to anyone to reapply firmware to fix issues at this time.

How do I know this? I called them because I get "Unfortunately, Music has stopped" error message when I use the default music player and asked for help. I was given several things to try which got nowhere and then they wanted to open a ticket to ship my phone in for repair, which I declined saying "I need my phone as it is my primary source of communication for home and work and cannot be without it for weeks". Then I got the survey at the end, to which I complimented the support effort but am beyond upset with Samsungs product as a simple thing like Music not working requires me to ship back the phone. $700 for a phone that "just about works" definitely will influence my next purchase.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] thanitos:
Why is the s3 unlocked but not the s4? I had the Sony ion and decided to get a new phone, my contract isn't up for a year and some change so I just bought it out right off eBay for 310$ brand new. Its unlocked and when I had my s2 I had tasks AOKP running on it. So why lock the 4?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] mg2195:
Because ATT is no longer supporting unlocked devices, so from here on out EVERY ATT device will have a locked bootloader...