yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[One (M7) Themes and Apps] philbaines:
What theme is that your on? Looks amazing and just what I have been looking for!

Please do tell!
[One (M7) Themes and Apps] Emwhyk:
Share these Icons bro
[One (M7) Themes and Apps] hello00:
http://browse.deviantart.com/art/Pearl-Line-reflecttion-94680697
[One (M7) Themes and Apps] davie81.dt:
That screen shot is immense! Any advice on how we could look to imitate......
[One (M7) Themes and Apps] davie81.dt:
Hi, Can you let me know the name of the clock widget you're using? It's superb
[One (M7) Themes and Apps] eskimosound:
4 years late but you can put any logo you want in statusbar using Xtended Settings on Google Play...

But you all know that now!!
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dev.ahchew:
I had the repository error and, It is like

ahchew@ahchew:~$ git clone git://github.com/TheMuppets/proprietary_vendor_samsung/i9300.git -b cm-10.1

Cloning into 'i9300'...

fatal: remote error:

TheMuppets/proprietary_vendor_samsung/i9300.git is not a valid repository name

Email support@github.com for help

Like This. All Is Matchin. Isn't it?

I would like to know my error's begenning. (Can You just understand, (My english is very not goooood...))
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] danarama:
If you go to:

https://github.com/TheMuppets/proprietary_vendor_samsung/tree/cm-10.1/i9300

And select the "git read only" button. Then press copy to clipboard, you'll find what you're actually wanting to clone is:

git://github.com/TheMuppets/proprietary_vendor_samsung.git
[Galaxy S II Android Development] n00b42:
[Topic]

I occasionally built RootBox for i9100 myself to include pdroid support.

As i was asked if i could provide a download for them i started this thread.

So far I only sync the official repo, patch the pdroid files from https://github.com/OpenPDroid/ and built the ROM.

For information about the official ROM or the pdroid project see the referenced topics below.

[Files]

I don't provide any sort of warranty, but i use(d) these ROMs myself and would not upload them if i had problems with them.

http://msdigital.de/files/RootBox/

(As i do it myself every new Download - i would recommend to check the file's md5 checksum on your device)

Changelog
"RootBox-JB-i9100-Unofficial-n00b42-pdroid-20130705"
* No changes (to official) besides pdroid patch
* Tested for two days w/o issues
** If problems with "android.process.acore" then backup your contacts and clear contact storage data

"RootBox-JB-i9100-Unofficial-n00b42-pdroid-20130612"
* No changes (to official) besides pdroid patch
* Testing it right now

[Credits]

All credits go to bajee11 for his awesome ROM and FFU5y and all others who work on OpenPdroid

[Future]

*I'm new to building, so if there are problems originating from me building the ROM contact me.

*Perhaps i will remove some apps or media files i never used, but will point it out if i do so

[References]

RootBox: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1806401

OpenPdroid: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2098156

n00b
[Galaxy S II Android Development] MPooZD:
Screenshots ?

Changelogs ?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] n00b42:
I didn't change anything of the original RootBox ROM besides applying the OpenPdroid patches.

For media / changelogs please look at the referenced official RootBox and OpenPdroid topics.

Regards

n00b
[Galaxy S II Android Development] :
Thx n00b,

But could you plz build another release over RB stable V4.0?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] n00b42:
I would like to do so, but currently i dont have a clue how to do it, as i only know how to build the lastest commited version and don't know how to "get back" to 4.0.

I already asked some guys and am currently waiting for a response if someone could help me with it.

If i manage to build it somehow, or if the RIL issue in the current nightlies is fixed, i will build it and post it here.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] :
I searched on github too but didn't find how to obtain previous version.

github is definetely not a real git or svn repos :(

Best solution is to ask bajee to give you a link to his v4.0 sources if possible.

Thx to keep us informed.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] leechseed:
Whats the difference of this ROM and RootBox with patching OpenPDroid afterwards?

Just curious:) would love to give v4 a try.

also bump:D

Greetz

SlimBean-b6|KangBang-v1.1|i9100¬Tapa2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] GreatVortex:
OpenPDroid is a set of modifications to the Android framework and libraries which allows fine-tuning of the data which applications are able to retrieve about your device, your account, your messages, and more. Specifically, it is a Privacy service provider (using the PDroid 1.51 interface) forked from CollegeDev's PDroid 2.0, which is itself an extension of Syvat's PDroid.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] leechseed:
Hey,

sorry for confusion - i know what pdroid is/does, just wanted to know whats the difference of thos rom to straight rootbox with pdroid patches (which are flashed after rom flash - generated with autopatcher) ;)

Greetz

SlimBean-b6|KangBang-v1.1|i9100¬Tapa2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] :
Thx Leech,

I completely forgot autopatcher.

I did give it a try but was unsuccessfull to patch RB v4.0 with openpdroid.

Autopatcher fails and gives me this error :

I'll have to move to autopatcher thread.

Stay tuned!

UPDATE :

What mateorod says about RootBox and autopatcher/openpdroid :

So we should wait for next openpdroid release or another solution could be to remove the breaking mms.apk from ZIP before patching.

I'll try this tomorrow.

CHEERS
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Chema_F:
Just followed a link to this thread from RB i9100 Support thread.

I'm actually on i9505 but my i9100 kept on RB v4.0 built from sources.

I only wanted you to know that my repo is still synced with 4.0 sources. I did the last sync just a couple of hours after Bajee released RB v4.0

However I don't know how to patch those Pdroid files. Feel free to contact me if you want me to do something.

GT-I9505 -- Omega v3.1 -- CWM 6.0.3.2.2 -- Sent from Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II Android Development] samsungmario:
You guys are doing a fanstastic job! Now if we can just patch the latest 6/11 nightly with HALO that would be incredible! I tried patching with AutoPatcher but it failed. Best to patch while building which I don't know how to do. Cheers.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] n00b42:
thx for the offer. but as the nightlies seem to work again for i9100, i will use the latest code again.

Building it right now. Will upload today.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] n00b42:
Just built latest nightly which includes HALO.

RootBox-JB-i9100-Unofficial-n00b42-pdroid-20130611

Testing it right now, so far no issues. Already uploaded it.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pSyCh¤_O_O:
So let me get it right....will mm.apk conflict with pdroid?...or is it only when using autopatcher?

Not finished uploading N00b?

RootBOX latest

DorimanX latest

Link to DorimanX Discussion Thread
[Galaxy S II Android Development] n00b42:
Sry, my server quota was exceeded but FTP didnt throw any errors, deleted all files but the newest one, will upload them on another server soon.

Dont know if theres problems with mms.apk,

sms etc works fine, never sent/get mms myself.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] :
Hi Noob.

I just downloaded and flashed your build. It's rebooting rigtt now.

If problems with your FTP server, I'll make your build availaible on my Mega repos soon (See link in my sig)

MMS.apk problem is only when trying to autopatch RB. I tried to remove mms.apk from ROM.zip before autopatching but still unsuccessfull. Problem is fagment.smali or framework.jar related.

So atm auto-patcher + RootBox + openpdroid are not fully compatible.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] n00b42:
Thanks for the offer, but i have another server i can use with much more space than the current one, but no access from here, so will do that later.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] :
No problem ma8.

I'm uploading your build on my MEGA Mirror anyway.

[UPDATE]

Just found one issue :

When Wifi is activated and connected, Mobile network is disconnected :(

Can someone else confirm this or is it just me?

If someone is interested, V6supercharger patches for RB v4.0, 11-06 nightly and 11-06-pdroid buidsl are available in [Mods] folder too ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] n00b42:
Just built and uploaded todays nightly which includes some bugfixes according to bajee11.

RootBox-JB-i9100-Unofficial-n00b42-pdroid-20130612

Testing it right now, so far no issues found.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pSyCh¤_O_O:
Not found any bugs on 0611 till now

Thanks n00b ;)

RootBOX latest

DorimanX latest

Link to DorimanX Discussion Thread
[Galaxy S II Android Development] kepeto:
waiting for latest build :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] n00b42:
last 2 days built did not finish...

but had no time to look into it up to now...

will provide an update when it finishs again...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Grimmy1st:
Today's stable would be nice... one of the rb guys is busy with other things, so Martine not so many nightlies next time...?

thanks in advance!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] n00b42:
As mentioned before i have no possibility to patch a stable version, as there are no branches or whatever which allow to checkout the stable version. If someone knows if there exist some branch or similar where i can sync the codebase to built using the stables codebase, let me know how.

I was able to built using todays code base, but unfortunately the ROM resulted in spamming "android.process.acore" shutdown errors, even with full wipe including data/sdcard/cache/dalvik formatting.

The error persisted with different kernels and after reflashing.

Therefore i label it unusable.

sry, i was looking forward to an updated version too.

As Bajee paused RB development i am afraid that problems with newer nightlies (or the codebase at all) will not be fixed in near future.. altough i hope my fears proove wrong...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Makishima:
Is it possible to flash the new version over the previous rootbox nightly? Will it work as an update or does it need to be treated as completely separate and needs full wipe?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] n00b42:
i am using the last uploaded version (05.07) for around 2 days now, without any issues*, coming from 4.1 without full wipe

( * as i did not do a fullwipe, i encountered issues with "...acore" error messages; backup your contacts and clearing "calendar storage" helped)

Regards

n00b
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Makishima:
I was quite skeptical about installing the latest version but, as I heard from a friend, he had no problems with it. He did a full wipe. Will you be updating the thread with the latest version any time soon? Because if so, I am going to wait for it.

Thanks for the reply.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] n00b42:
"RootBox-JB-i9100-Unofficial-n00b42-pdroid-20130705"

is already uploaded and as mentioned runs fine for 2 days now.

Don't know if i have the time to build new version soon, as i m on vacation for some time.

Regards

n00b
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Makishima:
Sorry, I meant the 20130707 version, I might have not made it clear.

Okay then I will install the latest you've built.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Makishima:
So far it looks just fine. No problem with the latest build. If anything comes up, I'll report. By the way, when I flashed it the dpi settings were set to 180, the one I use. I did a full wipe. How is this possible? I had made a backup of my hybrid settings but I had to restore a nandroid backup before flashing this and it said I had no settings backup.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Makishima:
There is a problem. Well, a few, but only one major.

Major one: - The phone has SODed twice and both times when it booted the battery was at 17%, although before the SOD it was 40-50%. I noticed that after a bit it started going up, slowly, but both times it was at 17% so I don't think it was normal. The kernel I use is 9.34 Dorimanx, but I doubt the kernel is at fault, since it worked perfectly with the official nightlies, and every other ROM I've tried. No undervolting as well.

Minor ones: - In power menu, instead of Reboot, it says Download, but when you press it, It shows the normal options. And then below the Reboot, Recovery, etc options it says 'Cancel | Download'.

- When the battery is very low it says 'Connect your charger !@#$' (or some symbols along these lines'. But this might be happening because of the major problem as the battery hasn't dropped normally that low since I installed, only with the two SODs.

- When the phone reboots, I insert my pin code and for a bit it says 'SIM is PUK locked' in the status bar. But this might also be a result of the major problem, I don't know.

I'm not sure if these were your build's faults entirely, but searching on the official Rootbox threads I didn't see any mentions of such problems. I did a full wipe as well. I might try the previous version to see if it has any similar problems, but I'm kind of tired of setting it up from scratch again. Anyway, hope this helps, and enjoy your vacation.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] n00b42:
I didn't encounter those problems myself.

I only had 1-2 freezes on high system load with high input speed where i had to power off and on again.

Perhaps next built solves those problems for you, but i can not promise when i will built.

Bajee announced a stable/final 4.2.2 version before moving to 4.3, when it is released i will try to build using that version.

Regards

n00b
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Makishima:
I think I know the reason for those problems now. I've moved on to Cyanogenmod, but even so I encountered similar problems. The problem seems to have been just performing a full wipe and not wiping cache and dalvik cache. Not entirely sure, but this negligence was sure to at some point give me problems. I will try the final version, perhaps. To be honest, Pdroid is no more a requirement for me, as I have found an app that does pretty much the same thing. Thanks anyway.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] samsungmario:
It's been awhile since your last post. Are you still keeping this project going? It would be nice to have a patch on the latest Rootbox if you have the time for it. Can you post how to build rootbox and patch it? I tried building rootbox without much success.

Cheers!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] n00b42:
Hi, sry for the delay, as the RB project is currently delayed as the programmer currently can not spend a lot of time for it, i looked out for another ROM, but came back to RB as most others i tried didnt satisfy me the way RB does/did.

The problem is, that RB only provides the newest codebase, no older snapshots (e.g. of stable builds), therefore i often (as now too) cannot build using this codebase, as there are bugs/errors which stop the build process.

I asked in the autopatcher ( http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1719408 ) thread if they could support RB and they did it. ( http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=45361469 )

I successfully generated a update.zip patch for the RB 4.2 stable and pdroid seems to work as expected.

Recommend to try that yourself, worked fine for me, as said before :)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] jelebi:
Hello,

Sorry for my poor english, I try as much as possible.

I followed this tutorial on my Galaxy Nexus with the official ROM JB 4.2.2 and ubuntuTouch Saucy in 2nd ROM.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2183721

I use the kernel lk_gnex_Hyuni_Dual_jb42_v.zip provided.

But when I boot ROM on the 2nd, I am running CyanogenMod logo loop (bootloop).

I have no CM ROM installed on my phone.

I download :

- saucy-preinstalled-touch-armel+maguro.zip

- saucy-preinstalled-touch-armhf.zip

- Kernel : http://www.4shared.com/zip/dE6mqokX/lk_gnex_Hyuni_Dual_jb42_v.html?

I fix install script :

- In "saucy-preinstalled-touch-armel+maguro.zip" i modified "/META-INF/com/google/android/updater-script" by

assert(getprop("ro.product.device") == "maguro" || getprop("ro.build.product") == "maguro");
mount("ext4", "EMMC", "/dev/block/platform/omap/omap_hsmmc.0/by-name/system", "/system");
package_extract_file("system/bin/backuptool.sh", "/tmp/backuptool.sh");
package_extract_file("system/bin/backuptool.functions", "/tmp/backuptool.functions");
set_perm(0, 0, 0777, "/tmp/backuptool.sh");
set_perm(0, 0, 0644, "/tmp/backuptool.functions");
run_program("/tmp/backuptool.sh", "backup");
unmount("/system");
show_progress(0.500000, 0);
[STRIKE]format("ext4", "EMMC", "/dev/block/platform/omap/omap_hsmmc.0/by-name/system", "0", "/system");[/STRIKE]
mount("ext4", "EMMC", "/dev/block/platform/omap/omap_hsmmc.0/by-name/[B]cache[/B]", "/system");
package_extract_dir("system", "/system");
symlink("/factory/hdcp.keys", "/system/vendor/firmware/hdcp.keys"); ...
...
show_progress(0.200000, 10);
package_extract_file("boot.img", "/dev/block/platform/omap/omap_hsmmc.0/by-name/boot");
show_progress(0.100000, 0);
ui_print("Fixing fs_size in crypto footer...");
assert(samsung.fs_size_fix());
unmount("/system");

- In "saucy-preinstalled-touch-armhf.zip" i modified "/META-INF/com/google/android/updater-script" by

ui_print("");
ui_print("Welcome to the Ubuntu RootFS Updater");
ui_print("");

show_progress(1.000000, 60);

ui_print("Mounting system and userdata partitions...");
[B]mount("ext4", "EMMC", "/dev/block/platform/omap/omap_hsmmc.0/by-name/cache", "/system");[/B]
[B]mount("ext4", "EMMC", "/dev/block/mmcblk0p12","/data");[/B]
set_progress(0.100000); ...
...

- Push files to my phone.

- Reboot in recovery with TWRP.

- Wipe cache.

- Install in the order saucy-preinstalled-touch-armel+maguro.zip & saucy-preinstalled-touch-armhf.zip.

- Install this kernel

- I reboot; 1st ROM ok; But the 2nd I have a sceen locked to CyanogenMod logo (instead of ubuntu).

Have you a answer? Thx
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] beekay201:
About the dual booting issue: post in that dev thread, better chances to get help IMO, since it's a specific issue; and you're seeing cyanogenmod boot anim because Ubuntu touch is based of it

a maguro wrote this.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] jelebi:
Ok thank you.

I can't post to dev forum, because of newbie status of my account.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] beekay201:
Engage in conversation with other xda members, ask pertinent questions in the right places, learn and help others learn or redirect them to the available resources, stickied on this forum.

a manta wrote this.
[Upgrading, Modifying and Unlocking] Daan:
Hi,

I have a big problem with a XDA i buyed yesterday.

The original rom was an italian rom, so i just wanted to upgrade to a english rom.

But the whole update failed with error 012 and my XDA isn't starting up anymore (i see two bars with the XDA first time alignment screen as background)

Now i want to flash it, just wrote the nk.nbf image to an sdcard (with XDArit) with the 3.5 option.

But it doesn't start at the diagnostics menu.

Just load's to the bootloader menu

If i just choose any option like BOOT ->SD than i get an error "CARD FAIL" if there's no card it says "NO CARD" so it's recognizing the card...

Has someone succeed to boot from an SD card with the 5.22 bootloader?
[Galaxy S 4 Active General] joshuadjohnson22:
Important links for the Galaxy S4 active:

Get 50% off Samsung Accessories by registering here

***Software Mod links***

Nottach + Xposed Framework works here

Get Google Wallet here

Original boot animation mod here

Phone Call Recording here

Speed up TouchWiz Mod here

If I left anything out let me know!

Reviews and stuff:

***********************************************************************************************************

Videos:

Unboxing

My initial post-unboxing thoughts

My screen comparison with the HTC One

Water Test

S4 Compared to the S4 Active

***********************************************************************************************************

Finally a galaxy we can view in the sunlight with the LCD. This is what I have been waiting for :). Ugly buttons and 8 mp camera but I will take it.

What do you think? It would make me mad if I had the S4, kinda like the skyrocket with the s2. I say hurry up and release AT&T....

(I hid the below photos because the pictures are big and cause annoyance if always up)

Colors:

Compared + other pictures:

Full review from GSM arena can be found here

http://www.androidcentral.com/samsung-announces-water-resistant-galaxy-s4-active

http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_officially_announces_the_galaxy_s4_active-news-6161.php
[Galaxy S 4 Active General] viper_insane:
On the fence here 1) 3 feet is hardly waterproof, so you could drop it in the toilet, not the pool. 2) Maybe a July release, not sure I would wait if I did not have the S4 in my hands now... 3) and most important, only 16gb. As a dude who waited the 2 weeks to get a 32, this is a non starter for me...

It is killer that its a user replaceable battery.
[Galaxy S 4 Active General] mattdm:
It's a very interesting device...if the Moto X doesn't turn out to be the über-phone I'm hoping for, I may sell my current S4 and pick up one of these.
[Galaxy S 4 Active General] joshuadjohnson22:
Yeah, but it is still worth it IMO. I wish they packed more GB in but looks good, LCD is huge for me. My HTC One will keep my busy until I can grab this beauty
[Galaxy S 4 Active General] Norcalz71:
I MIGHT have to upgrade again when this release, waterproof/dust proof is a flagship level not-dumbed-down (except camera) phone is about the most sought-after feature for me that I can think of that is not yet widely available. I hope it sells really well so that the next iteration of the galaxy line (and other manufacturers) will feature a flagship level, truly rugged device. More depth on the waterproofing (say 10 meters?) would be nice, but hey its a start. Think it visually looks great too for what it is.
[Galaxy S 4 Active General] joshuadjohnson22:
It probably can go deeper but they have to say that just in case there are complications. Just as long as you don't make it a practice to submerge very deep you should be ok. Personally I will just use it for mistakes like toilet and if I bring it to the pool but forget. I don't plan on purposely bringing my phone into the water.

I agree, I have high hopes, it looks nice, adds the feature I want (reason I avoided the S4 was the screen) I just hope AT&T decide to keep the bootloader unlocked :fingers-crossed:
[Galaxy S 4 Active General] Norcalz71:
agreed. I spend summer on the water and winter on the snow, even decent waterproofing is a hell of a feature to me.
[Galaxy S 4 Active General] rschauby:
So how much bulkier is this thing? A rugged phone is very appealing.
[Galaxy S 4 Active General] joshuadjohnson22:
did you click to see the photos? It is just a tad bit bigger, not too much
[Galaxy S 4 Active General] mattdm:
Did you not see the pictures in the OP? It doesn't look that much more bulky...
[Galaxy S 4 Active General] Slade8525:
wow surprised this wasnt vaporware. might switch if the screen is brighter.
[Galaxy S 4 Active General] alex6speed:
Yup ... was about to say it probably would survive deeper depths, just not as long as your dive down lower.

Sounds good for people looking for a rugged phone, goes to the beach and stays on the shallow end, or your creepy voyeur at the local pool (if you're the last person list, please leave! :p).
[Galaxy S 4 Active General] rschauby:
I was assuming that was a "fake" picture. If it's the real thing than that's pretty awesome.
[Galaxy S 4 Active General] joshuadjohnson22:
It is real if you click the link below the pictures you will see the rest of the review and pictures of it in the hand
[Galaxy S 4 Active General] blyndfyre:
http://m.neogaf.com/showthread.php?t=577369
[Galaxy S 4 Active General] Slade8525:
buttons are ugly, but logical. im ok with 8mp camera and LCD rather than amoled; id rather have a brighter lcd over amoled