yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] jeep447:
Hey man I have to apologize because I responded to your question the first time you asked, but then I got so wrapped up working on my own stuff that I completely forgot to follow up with you on it. On top of that I was also wrong about successfully using wifi direct with this rom, because I just realized that I was using a friends phone (who was on a different rom at the time) to do a wifi direct transfer with on the day you asked. So I just checked mine and I can at least confirm that I am also unable to use wifi direct, and like you said the option doesn't even show up like it should under the systems "share" options, even though I verified I was connected to the other device in the wifi direct settings. I tried 5 different file managers and I've got the same results on most of them because they bring up the systems share menu (which wifi direct is missing from for some reason), but File Expert actually brings up it's own menu which actually has wifi direct as an option, but whenever I try to use it it always just times out. I also noticed that sometimes when you try to doing wifi direct with File Expert, it will actually crash the wifi direct connection between my phone and the other one. So I know it doesn't help much but maybe it'll make ya feel better at least knowing that you're not the only one having that issue on this rom. It's definitely strange because I have used wifi direct several times on other aosp roms so I'm pretty confident that it's not just an aosp issue, and I'm not sure how to do it but I'll look into getting it reported as a possible bug. Hopefully it's something that can be squashed because it's a really awesome feature to have especially when you transfer between devices a lot. Sorry I couldn't be more help man.

Sent from the bag phone in my Pontiac Fierro
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] starche_old:
Yep, I found it. In trigger options I unchecked the very last checkbox. Works as expected :)

Still didn't fix Swype though. Hopefully I'll have a bit more time tomorrow. In the same time - if you using Swype, do you have the same issue?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] makailey:
You can also adjust the width of the trigger so it doesn't even come close to keyboard. I use swype with no issues. Just look in the same area and you will see how to shrink trigger area.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] atmos929:
Oh my God, thank you very much for testing... you bring some reassurance to my heart lol...

I was concerned about the possibility that actually no one ever uses wifi direct, I also asked in another ROMs thread and got no response either, apparently not everyone needs to use it, I tried 3 different AOSP ROMs (latest releases of course) and the issue is present in all of them...

I was also concerned that this was one of the so called "CM10.1 known issues" that several AOSP ROM threads talk about, but they never specify, so it is good to know that you have used it in past ROM releases.

Thank you!... If you think there is anything I can do to help... let me know.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] starche_old:
I played with that slider for a while and found optimal for myself.

IDK why Swype doesn't stick as primary keyboard. It's really annoying to switch keyboard from stock to Swype every time I'm typing smth... I never saw that before not I heard any rods like that
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] jeep447:
No problem at all man and I know what you mean because I'm really surprised more people haven't asked about it yet. I used to use it almost daily awhile back because I had a few different devices that I was working with, and it was awesome being able to transfer a rom (or whatever) to the other devices with wifi direct because it was way faster than downloading it on each one. Since I've been on this rom I haven't needed to use it because I got rid of the other phones, so it's kind of a bummer knowing it doesn't work at the moment :( This rom just runs so smoothly and my battery life is so ridiculous that I still couldn't leave it behind even if I needed it though, so hopefully it'll get fixed. I'm not sure if you've looked into it or not but there is at least possible work around because there are a bunch of apps on Play that let you transfer files through wifi direct, but the only downside is that both devices need to have the app in order to do the transfer. Other than that though it should at least be a way to do it if need be, but I haven't tried one myself yet so I unfortunately can't verify that they'll work. I'm definitely not trying to plug another rom or anything, but I will say the aosp rom that I successfully used wifi direct with was Liquid, but that was also a couple of months ago so it's always possible that it could be a bug in the newer cm10 base (which would explain why multiple other roms are having the issue), but hard telling. Anyway I'll definitely let ya know if I get anywhere with it and like I said I really hope it gets ironed out because it's an awesome feature to have. :D

Sent from the bag phone in my Pontiac Fierro
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] feerlessleadr:
Love the new version, amazing battery (probably better than my TW ROMs).

However, something has come up in the latest version that I haven't seen mentioned. I use 'car mode' when I put my phone into a car dock quite a bit (where it activates a car app, and when the home button is pressed, it brings you to the car app, and not the launcher).

I noticed that on the most recent version, when I hit the home button when I'm in car mode, nothing happens anymore. This happens both on the physical button, as well as the navigation bar home button (if I have that enabled).

Is there something that I am missing (maybe a setting that I accidentally activated)? Is anyone else running into this issue?

I just did a fully clean install, and everything else seems to be working fine, except for this.

Thanks
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] kimpelry:
OK I have ran three battery cycles since being on devil kernel, the difference in the battery for me is slight if any I still get 24 - 36 hours with 3 -4 hours of screen time

Sent from Jack's castle atop the beanstalk
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Zugshad:
Has anyone had an issue since the update with using wifi ap? I used it on the last version and only thing since I've updated to the new version of this and updated to new version of devil (was using 25 when works) haven't seen anyone post on this since updated, if not any suggestions?

Sent from my Beanstalked Note 2 with Tapatalk 4.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Killamurk:
I am having a issue with the camera .. In video mode it will not auto focus and it will not focus when I tap the screen for it to focus the videos record very blurri
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] starche_old:
Try deck 24.6, works fine. That's not to mention that Wi-Fi as well as USB tethering works perfectly. There were reports with the same issue, that makes me think it's more CM/AOSP bug rather the ROM related issue. note this been fixed. Here's the link:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=40410021

One more thing. I'm running latest Beanstalk 1.275 and there was an issue for me: Swype keyboard used to be kinda disabled. What I mean: whatever I'm opening to type all the times stock keyboard is on, although last time I selected Swype. Never mind, long tap on space bar and select Swype. With new devil kernel Swype stays, i.e. I don't need to select it all the time. I know, that's sounds really weird, but it is what it is. I'm happy :)

How fast we can expect 4.3? Will 4.3 been compiled from CM/AOSP sources directly or that means way more effort and time involved in porting 4.3 on this ROM?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] bkeaver:
Your probably asking in the wrong thread since this is a port of the original. I would go to the original rom thread and ask that. You will probably get a better answer ;)

Sent from my SGH-i317 Note 2 on Tapatalk 2 - running on Beanstalk powered goodness!!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] starche_old:
Actual what I meant is how fast after 4.3 will show up in CM we can get 4.3 in Beanstalk? :)

Sent from SGH-i317m
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] bkeaver:
And again since Willl03 is not the developer of beanstalk it would be probably better to ask in the thread that actually develops the rom. Willl03 just ports and adds his touches to it...

I think Scott would be the first to put it out this is why I say this... not being difficult just trying to direct you where you may get the best answer to your question :)

Sent from my SGH-i317 Note 2 on Tapatalk 2 - running on Beanstalk powered goodness!!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] starche_old:
I see what you mean. Thanks :)

Sent from SGH-i317m
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] otisman:
I'm sure once Scott get beanstalk to 4.3 and willl03 get what he needs we all in beanstalkville will be happy happy aloha family

Sent from my GT-N7105 using Xparent Red Tapatalk 2
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] makailey:
Amen brother
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] johntortorella:
It is just me or is wi-fi weaker on AOSP? I get full bars at home and at work, and in those same spots on AOSP, I get one bar less. Not sure if speed really degrades though.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] wase4711:
there is absolute no corelation between signal strength and the number of bars you see..

if you want to compare signal strength, you need a app that will tell you the signal level in dbm...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] johntortorella:
Thanks for the quick reply!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] tkjeeper:
Wtf? Really? Why are they there? Learn something new everyday!

tkjeeper out
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] userdefind:
Can some one tell me more about dBm is it better to have a higher number or lower. Also if anyone is having a problem with mobile data and your on rogers or bell I believe I have a fix for it. This is only if your getting less then 3mbs. After this small fix I have been getting up to 10mbs on h+ and DC
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] wase4711:
they are there to give you a RELATIVE, graphic representation of what your signal might be; however, the ONLY way to know how strong your signal is is to get an app that measures it in dbm....there are several network signal measurement program in the play store, so if you really want to know what your signal strength is, you gotta use one of those programs...and, of course you know that the LOWER the DBM number, the stronger your signal is...

The signal bars look nice and colorful, but, they are by no means accurate...

If you've been around long enough, you know that you have had phones/roms that showed one bar or less, and the signal was loud and clear, and also have had times with full bars, and the signal was weak and worthless.....

---------- Post added at 04:14 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:12 PM ----------

see my post below yours...the strongest DBM you will ever see is -55; when your DBM is over 100, you are gonna start losing all signal...103 is the highest I can go and still get some sort of data/signal on my phone..
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Rocket42:
You can look in settings/about phone/ status to see your dbm

Sent from my SGH-i317

Using SkyBlue Xparent Tapatalk
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] wase4711:
thanks Rocket; I forgot about that!!

Its been so long since I cared about signal strength, I forgot about that one..:good:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] willl03:
Yep! Many things have to be redone for 4.3 and Scott the BeanStalk dev is a one man army. His newborn landed few days ago so 4.3 release will depend how much the baby drools and cry :P

Until then there's a new version to play with, will get on it in the next few days
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ruinkhan:
BeansTalk has the option to show signal bar as dBm style (settings-->System--->status bar--->signal styles), getting -101 at work.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] tkjeeper:
Wait, its not Scott of cleanrom is it? Prob not.

tkjeeper out
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] willl03:
scott.hart.bti

original thread

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2091900
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Zugshad:
Just FYI, it was the new update of devil 27.2 that appears to be the culprit of the wifi ap issue, updated to 27.6 and that fixed, thanks to whoever pointed the update our

Sent from my Beanstalked Note 2 with Tapatalk 4.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Old Man Dave:
Devil just updated to 28. I'm just putting it on - I'll let you know if I see any issues.

Sent from the Great White North.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Zugshad:
Lol well dang, so far no issues with this one, so I'll give a few and update

Sent from my Beanstalked Note 2 with Tapatalk 4.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Killamurk:
I don't see the download to the Deck 24.6 .. Also is there a 4.3 camera?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Zugshad:
The link is for devil kernel think deck was atypo/auto correct, and as the post above me looks like up to 28 now

Sent from my Beanstalked Note 2 with Tapatalk 4.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Killamurk:
I don't understand should I flash the devil kernel to fix the camera issue or does the devil kernel comes with a better camera apk?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] johntortorella:
Is there any way to fix the force closes in advanced settings > sound? And I might have to try the devil kernel, so much discussion about it! Been running the neak one that comes with the rom.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] feerlessleadr:
Just wanted to give my question one more chance...Anyone else experience this?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] infamous916:
My phone freezes up then just reboots

Sent From A Soul Stealing Ginger Using Note II Tapatalk 4 Beta
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Zugshad:
no.. devil kernel that he linked was in referance to my issue wiht the wifi ap i believe.. the kernel is not going to do anything for you with the camera issue.. if you scroll back a few pages, there were several pages of camera issues discussed and some links/attachments posted for fix.. so scroll back or do a search and I believe your issue has already been discussed and solutions resolved..
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] userdefind:
You are right man there are meany fixes in a post or two way back there

---------- Post added at 05:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:29 PM ----------

Just installed the devil kernel and no it doesn't fix it
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] eZdubzitmk4:
I made a thread for a camera fix
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] teddygreen17:
Hi all, I download the ROM and its great. I have one question though. It seems that folks on here like to talk about kernels and such. What the difference between the preloaded kernel for this ROM and say the devil kernel. Is it worth my investment?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] RogerP15:
Had this ROM for a few days now and I'm loving it! Lately though it has been freezing or doing random reboots.

Anyone else having this issue?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] vmatt:
I am experiencing reboots no freezes and it seems to be app related.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] userdefind:
The devil kernel has OC and dual boot and a better audio setup but that's the only diff really. There are some other things just make a backup give it a try and if you don't like it restore back. I have used both and like the devil better

---------- Post added at 08:11 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:08 PM ----------

Are you using a torrent downloader there was a problem with that a little back. Something about it making the CPU work more then what it needed and make it reboot. Something like that might be happening to you but with a other app
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] vmatt:
Yes ttorrent seemed to have been the culprit. No big deal love the rom appreciate all the effort.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] userdefind:
Might want to looking into crossbreed maybe update it. OE use a different torrent downloader because lately mine has been fine. Just make sure your crossbreed is working right. Sounds weird but that was my problem
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] RogerP15:
I'm not using torrent. Any ideas why mine would freeze or do random reboot?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] infamous916:
I'm going back to stock I think until I get my hands on 4.3

Sent From A Soul Stealing Ginger Using Note II Tapatalk 4 Beta
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] tkjeeper:
That's a shame...cya.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] infamous916:
This rom is causing complete system crash and for no reason. It almost cost me my job today cause my boss thought I hung up on her when I had to pull the battery to boot it, I just can't afford that kinda bug on my main phone, don't get me wrong I love this ROM I just can't take that risk

Sent From A Soul Stealing Ginger Using Note II Tapatalk 4 Beta
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] GetPatriotized:
For some reason Android debugging doesn't stay on. Every now and then (titanium backup) asks me to re-enable it.

and in CPU Spy, it's always running at 1600 MHz. A little in deep sleep but nothing in between! This is coming from a clean install.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] userdefind:
For titanium mine did that too but it still work fine don't know why it dose that but its still working
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Rocket42:
Hmmm. Not having any issues at all here. No reboots ...no freezing..nothing but beanstalk goodness as always.

Sent from my SGH-i317

Using SkyBlue Xparent Tapatalk
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] otisman:
+1 on that rocket aloha family

Sent from my SGH-I317 using Xparent Red Tapatalk 2
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] userdefind:
If anyone is still having a problem with random reboots play pm me so I can help you. I had the same problem and its fixed now
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Liquidmetal6:
Holy hell the battery life of this ROM is unreal. Unplugged at 12 PM yesterday, used it all day, unplugged all night, used it all today, still at 50% with the ZeroLemon. Let's see if we can get to day 4....
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] GetPatriotized:
I get that too but sometimes it's really unchecked.

Written on Note 2 running BeanStalk *The Fine-Tuned AOSP*
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] jeep447:
No offense man but I highly doubt the rom itself is causing the crashes, but anything is always possible I guess. I've been running the last 4 versions of Beanstalk and I haven't had a single random reboot since day one. I have had a couple of apps go haywire and cause some strange things after restoring the data from a previous build, but getting rid of the restored data and reinstalling the app has always solved the problem for me. I'm not just saying you're 100% wrong though because every device and every situation is different, it just sounds weird hearing "this rom caused this" because for me it's been the most stable rom I've ever had. EVER! :D

Sent from the bag phone in my Pontiac Fierro
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] infamous916:
I did a full wipe and fresh start and still had the same issues, I'm on a weird model of att Gt-N7105

Sent From A Soul Stealing Ginger Using Note II Tapatalk 4 Beta
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] PsyCl0ne:
A weird model? Is there a chance your download could be corrupt?

~PsyCl0ne
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Senyaka:
Try a new download. When I first flashed this, I had some weird issues with the status bar and a few other bugs. Turned out to be a bad download. When I tried again, I had no issues. :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Jonathanpeyton:
Doesnt "GT" signify Tablet? Im running BS on my SGN-13I7.I was nder the assumption. that this particular version of Beanstalk was for phones... (however I am posting this with a GT-8013, but Im running a ROM made for tablets on it) ....could that be causing your issues?

Sent from my GT-N8013 using Xparent Purple Tapatalk 2
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] RichMD:
My phone is an AT&T LTE Note 2. My phone also shows GT-N7105 which is really just the LTE international version. Your build.prop controls what shows in "about phone".
[MENTION=4927175]infamous916[/MENTION] - I agree you should try a new download, full wipe and try flashing the ROM without restoring any apps initially just to prove that the ROM is solid before you try other apps. Restoring system data could cause lots of problems.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] vmatt:
Mine is att SGH i317 but now identifying as gtn7105 wth?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] RichMD:
We have the same phone and mine shows the same thing. What shows in "about phone" is not that important. It does have some impact on what the Play Store will say is compatible (or even show) and S-Pen functionality can be affected. As an example, I've had my phone show as a "Galaxy Nexus" when setting up Google Wallet. Some S-Pen functionality would be affected and additional apps would be available but that's it. After getting Google Wallet working, I would change the build.prop to show the correct phone "SGH I317". I don't worry about what is shows. Many ROMs (particularly 4.2.2 which isn't released for our model) are based on the international version and simply leave the build.prop from that version.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] vmatt:
Appreciate the explanation rom works great despite its identity crisis lol.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] infamous916:
I did that and I only have more issues now lol my internal storage has now split and I can't find my original until I plug into a computer anyone know a fix?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] jeep447:
Yeah just like some other people were saying I'd also try grabbing another copy of the rom and try flashing it again, but I know exactly what you mean about the job thing. The only thing is though you're always taking a risk no matter what rom you're flashing (even if it's stock) or what kind of modding you're doing, because anything can always go wrong at any time and even a completely stock phone can have the hiccups every now and then. I had the same thing happen a couple of years ago and I almost lost my job over it too, because I flashed a rom and then that night I set my alarm for the next morning, but I woke up 2 hours late because the phone had froze up overnight. It definitely sucks but you also can't blame anybody but yourself for messing with it to begin with (and just to clarify I'm definitely not saying that's what you were doing), but it's just hard not to with all of the benefits you get out of it in the long run. Anyway hopefully you get it worked out because this is a ridiculously solid rom from my experience anyway :D

Sent from the bag phone in my Pontiac Fierro
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] infamous916:
Its stable now but I lost all of my SD card, it fully wiped
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ruinkhan:
Some Devs write this in their threads for a reason.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] infamous916:
I never said the OP was the cause, I'm merely stating what happened in case anyone knew a fix
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] userdefind:
9 hours with out a post what gives. Well let me break the silence with a small request. Sorry if that's not aloud here my bad. But it would be really sweet if we could change the little icon that shows up with your using the spen and hovering over the screen. Also would like to say will you really out did your self. I'm loving it like MC Donalds
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] userdefind:
I really hope everyone is camping or something all most a whole day with no other post. I miss the family
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] nowy57:
same to me !

unreal !

:)

but it is true ..

:)

zerolemon 9300mAh
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Neva Eva Forget 1984:
Waiting for the new update... should be out soon... you'll see the masses back...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] infamous916:
I can't wait for a 4.3 custom rom , I got stock 4.3 :(
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] PsyCl0ne:
Hahaha poor muffin! Only stock 4.3!?! :p

~PsyCl0ne
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] infamous916:
Honestly its not much different from 4.2.2 you don't really notice a lot of changes, 5.0 and 5.1 are gonna be the ones to get excited about
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] SwimDrewid:
Been trying out that new mibox rom all weekend.

But now I'm back to beanstalkville - stability and battery life cannot be beat!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Xelstyle:
Went to try Jedi to see whether I wanted to go back to Touchwiz or not. Took a good minute and I realized that even with the themes and whatnot, the elegance of this ROM was the way to go.