yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] LAKAME_MAN:
Okay I have this problem in JB TW based ROMs I have tried (SweetROM, ULTIMATE, SuperBean) that whenever an app is gonna force close, the phone soft reboots without the popup "unfortunately, blah blah blah has stopped...". Is this a known issue or I'm the only one facing this? Thanks :D
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Varad297:
try a later build of the ROM in which this particular problem may have been solved. These problems are quite common with the primitive versions of a ROM when it's in the development stages. Try sending PM to the ROM developer if you have such problems.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] XxPixX:
Like Varad said, make sure to also perform a clean install before you flash a ROM. This includes wiping system, preload, cache, dalvik cache, factory reset.

Always make a backup too.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] raylusion:
I have my sgh i337m from claro pr had it rooted try to put font installer fonts and wont boot up!!please help
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] bos_xda_II:
ANYONE WM 2003 SE FULLVERSION ?
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] Guest:
Just look around and youll see a lot... dUh!!
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] Ken_xda:
Dear,

There are only 3 unofficial versions at the moment which are V. 2.02, 2.06 and 2.20.07WWE (the latter one is still under development and is not yet 100% functional) and another 1 official release V2.20CH (Chinese Version)

Cheers,
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] double_ofour:
Ehem!!! let me just correct you... the 2.20 is official release by dopod and the 2.02 and 2.06 are the non official release by someone...

In short there are only 3 active WM2003SE available, 2 are unofficial and 1 is official...

Correct me if im wrong...
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] darren_the:
yes, you are right

but 2 is english , 1 is chinese (CHS)
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] bos_xda_II:
where i can download ?

where i can download ?
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] Ken_xda:
Dear all,

I am right about the statement above and here is the link for download. BTW, thanks to those original developers of these Roms and here you are for the links and downloads

V2.02WWE http://xdaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=74980#74980 (on the very first page)

V 2.06WWE http://xdaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=74980#74980 (on bottom of the first page) Note that there are many customization to this version. However, the differences of each file is rooted in the customization of Extended Rom.

V 2.20.07WWE http://xdaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=74985#74985

All the above are UNOFFICIAL with the latter being under development and not yet 100% functional. However, the rate at which buzz_lightyear and mamaich are after the completion is rapid so stick to the site for update

The only official rom is now in chinese version and the link to that is http://mamaich.kasone.com/imate/chineese_se.rar

Cheers,[/quote][/code]
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] double_ofour:
dUh!! if you look unto the official dopod website. Dopod released the 2.20CHS SE for dopod 696 wich is equivalnt to o2 XDA II... Did you get me? The 2.02 and the 2.06 are the images wich was not realesed and it is only for the developer of the himalaya device wich was stolen (maybe) and posted somewhere else on the net thats why we got it but the 2.20 was not stolen or illegal release becouse dopod actually dopod released it..... Duh!
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] ibba:
dazed and confused!

Out of all the downloads and rom upgrades out there, what is the most stable and comprehensive. This is my first time here and I'm afraid of hurting my baby.
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] henrylim:
Re: dazed and confused!

The fact is, that the 2.20CHS version is the official ROM that is released. All the other 3 versions will work on your device, but depending on your needs, it has varying degree of differences you may have to live with.

IMHO,

2.20WWE ( hack from 2.20CHS, half-translated from Chinese to English by mamaich. Contains the best combination of drivers/default software (e.g. WMP10 mobile, BT settings))

2.02 (better BT settings, same BT stack as 2.06. Poor cleartype. Same software. Faster reset. BT Handsfree implementation not complete. WMP 9 Mobile)

2.06 (Better cleartype. Same software. Slower reset. BT Handsfree configuration missing. WMP 9 Mobile)

All 3 versions have these common issues (I believe):

(a) BT profile will hide on Today items if not use.

(b) Speaker (reported by a few pple, not sure if its true or not).

(c) SDIO does not support Sandisk SD Wifi Combo card (w 256RAM)

(d) There are a number of software that will hang/hard reset/soft reset the device. These are the software that is not built to support WM2003SE.

I would seriously advise you to spend some time and search the forum with the key words WM2003SE, ROM, upgrade.

I understand that there are many discussions on these matters, but it will really benefit you in checking the latest updates.
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] ibba:
Muchas Gracias!

Thanks so much for clarifying it for me. I've been reading the threads half the night and came out more confused than ever.

There seems to be a lot of discussion going on about what is better.

Now I have a better understanding of what is available.

When you say half chinese what does that mean exactly?

Thanks again!

:D
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] henrylim:
That means....

Mamaich has hacked the 2.20CHS ROM to remove some of the Chinese translation mappings from the ROM. I believe the job is incomplete as some of the translations are within the DLL files and are difficult to be removed. The effort result in the 2.20WWE ROM.

Therefore, if you installed the 2.20WWE ROM, you get some of the software still with Chinese characters in the menu items.
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] mudenza:
Then...

Any point in upgrading? Ive got 1.6 wwe, and since all three aren't perfect, might as well wait for a post saying eureka ive got it. or am i wrong? I'm so confused with these posts, thus if it is useful upgrading, can any one briefly sum up what is on average the best rom then please? or shall I wait?

Grazie mille

:D

Steve
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] LnX:
Are you stupid or something? Do you know what UNOFFICIAL and OFFICIAL mean? Read the quote from Ken_xda.

The 2.02, 2.06 and 2.20.07WWE are UNOFFICIAL.

Errr ... yes the 2.20CHS is OFFICIAL but the 2.20.07WWE (translated from chinese to english) is UNOFFICIAL :shock:

if you can count that's a total of 4 different images ...

1) 2.02 - UNOFFICIAL http://xdaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=74980#74980

2) 2.06 - UNOFFICIAL http://xdaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=74980#74980

3) 2.20.07WWE - UNOFFICIAL http://xdaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=74985#74985

4) 2.20CHS - OFFICIAL (DOPOD OR POSTED ON MAMAICH'S WEBSITE)
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] double_ofour:
What the Hell.. 2.20.something is official!!! even if they traslated it to englisg, tagalog, korean but its still came from the official released!!!
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] LnX:
Re: Then...

If you're not up to the challenge of literally "TOASTING" your XDA then I strongly discourage you to upgrade. But if you do understand the consequences then go ahead. :D If I were you I'd wait though since all of the versions have bugs you would have to find the BEST one yourself. Lucky for you if you flashed it the first time and its perfect.

Now if you're up for the challenge and HAVE A LOT OF EXTRA TIME be ready to upgrade/downgrade endlessly to find the BEST version.

Good Luck :D
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] double_ofour:
What the Hell.. 2.20.something is official!!! even if they traslated it to englisg, tagalog, korean but its still came from the official released!!! they still came from the original..
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] LnX:
Hmmm ... there's something wrong with your definition of OFFICIAL you might be using a different dictionary. Yes the 2.20.07WWE came from the official 2.20CHS.

Its UNOFFICIAL simply because it is NOT the OFFICIAL ENGLISH version released by O2. Do you get my point?

Translating it to another language does not make it OFFICIAL. Sheesh :roll:

edited:

It's official CHINESE but it's not official ENGLISH or official GERMAN version. FYI, being a Filipino you should know by now our national language is not TAGALOG its called FILIPINO. TAGALOG is a dialect similar to BISAYA, PANGGALATOK, etc.
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] edsub:
I think we should put an end to an official - unofficial discussion.

Because i like to alsways say something last: All SE versions for non Dopod devices are UNofficial. For Dopod devices there is 1 official SE rom version.

Simply because there were NO roms initially released for these devices. Thus: When focussing on non-Dopod its only a matter of determining how unofficial these roms are. Which is a stupid question in itself, but here we go:

Only for Dopod there is an official (2.20 CHS) SE ROM

For all other Himalaya's all SE ROM's are unofficial:

2.02WWE dcs

2.06WWE mystery man

2.20.07WWE translated from CHS by mamaich

2.20CHS

The 2.02 and 2.06 versions are WWE test versions from presumably HTC.

2.20.07 is the (partial) translated CHS retail version

2.20CHS is the Dopod retail version.

FULL STOP??
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] superperry:
Full stop? Ans = YES.... :)

I agree with edsub...

No more quarrel okay? Let's have a peace in this forum and help each other instead... Some words are offensive to some people (eg. duh!, stupid!..dumb! and so.. on..), so please let's try not to used it. Let's have a happy holiday and hope to find all answer without insulting each other.

PEACE to all yo! (FYI, I am not a priest) :oops:
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] ukmctc:
official or not

OK OK! :twisted:

Unless you purchased the software from a reputable dealer/software warehouse or it came on your PDA when you bought it, its

not official

, if its one from this site or another like it (added too or altered from the original, then its

UN-OFFICIAL

.

I think that should clear up any misunderstanding! :lol:
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] :
in imho then if ones operator put up a romupgrade on their site for their supported devices then it is official

imho then official == legal, recommended upgrade and supported by the place one got the device
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] LnX:
My point exactly

I definitely agree ... good thing some people understand :wink:

The insult started from the "Guest" whom is obviously the same person. Even the capitalization of the "duh!" is the same.

Coincidence?

It ticked me off since he/she started insulting bos_xda_II then after that continued with Ken_xda. The hero in me just couldn't help it. Its not polite to answer a question with "dUh!!" .... :evil:

Ok ... /me made his point. /me stops insult if the "Guest" stops too ... Peace to everyone :D
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] rokujou:
Shame, I was having fun reading it all, too :P just kidding.

er... would you look at that... I posted. All I usually do is read this forum, then finally i contribute a useless post to a topic that lost it's direction ages ago.

rokujou
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] double_ofour:
Sorry to you all guys if i couse trouble... official or unofficial its still SE.. ehehey!! Merry Christmas to you all!!! Peace Be With YOU!! I love you guys..

Hey dud if you are still confused what to upgrade heres how... i hope it will help you.

===========================================

Posted by Sin:

By first flashing with the 2.02.t1WWE ROM (& 1.18.00 Radio + Extended ROM), then setting up BT and detecting all devices but before adding additional software, I ran an ActiveSync backup. The reason I used ActiveSync was to capture the registry and system state but not an image of the whole ROM.

I then flashed with the 2.06.00WWE ROM + 1.18.00 Radio & Extended ROM, but this time I restored from the ActiveSync backup. Rather than what I expected (everything good about 2.06 to be blown away), ActiveSync restore did a merge of the 2 registries and overwrote the files not in use.

The end result came as a surprise:

I now have a version 2.06.00WWE that doesn't hang/delay on reboot, runs faster, looks great with cleartype and now has BT Handsfree as an option. Handsfree works great, though still blocks ActiveSync via BT (a reboot auto disables it) but it doesn't interfere with the radio now.

Are you sure they didn't just rename BT Handsfree in 2.02t1WWE to BT Headset in 2.06.00WWE? (same functionality, just no menu option in the later)

The reason I'm posting this, is not to produce a backup file for installation, but to give those of us playing around with the ROMS's food for thought.

I'm curious what would happen if someone installed an English version, deleted Media player 9 & it's registry as much as possible, then backed up. Then installed the Chinese version (2.20.07CHS with Media Player 10) and restored the original backup over it.

Would you end up with a combined Chinese version in English with Media Player 10?

(Before you ask why I don't try it myself - I need a break so I'm going back to work )

Source: http://xdaforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=14227

===========================================

and if your not using the flashmans files then delete those flashmans file on startup... now ive left in my startup are the "CheckAutoRun, ChgDfLnk, IA_Caller_ID, poutlok, RegNotify, stk" and makes your PPC fast. Try it...

Just install the 2.02 WM2003SE DCS Rom then use ActiveSync backup.. (Dont install anything after the 2.02 was installed just backup after upgraded to 2.02) after the ActiveSync backup were completed reflash again, use the 2.06 WM2003SE Mamaich Rom then Restore the backuped files from ActiveSync... then delete those flashmans... then VOILA!!!

Result: Fast and Stable, For me no hangs for reboot fast load when reboot and more stable... (For me... i dont know for you...)
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 ROM Development] Jim18ph:
hi guys just upgraded to 2.06.00WWE. i tot dat it wud lessen the consumption of battery on my xda,i've heard frm another forum that version 1.72 eats up less batt power. is this true?where can i get this version? &can i downgrade? tnx. appreciate if u cud reply & answer my questions. tnx
[Sony Xperia ZL] keith777:
I'm just curious if anyone has removed it and it is better with no issues. I didn't get the extra one in the box and the one on there already has a hairline scratch that is annoying me, I've never had a screen protector on any smartphone before....
[Sony Xperia ZL] sirsmokey:
i have removed it and no the sony logo doesnt peel off like on the z, i have applied IQ screen protector and it is way better int terms of scratches and fingerprint smudges.
[Sony Xperia ZL] keith777:
Thanks, I'll check into that screen protector. I was curious too if anyone has left it off (without another one) and had any issues - I've read some people saying it has no oleophobic coating so gets a lot of fingerprints. And so I read about a product called Fusso Smartphone http://www.amazon.com/Anti-fingerprint-Oleophobic-SmartPhone-TM-necessary/dp/B008HVBU9O and am thinking maybe this can be used? Or is it good by itself after removing screen protector
[Sony Xperia ZL] sirsmokey:
I would only suggest that u use a screen protector made specifically for your phone brand and model type.

Should you get a protector ? only you can decide what kind of person you are and how to treat things you purchase.

but in my instance

I took my OEM screen protector off a day earlier than when the new one was to arrive. that was a long day, constantly had to remind my self to be careful of where I put my phone. I am quite pleased with IQ s screen protector
[Sony Xperia ZL] kickthefreak:
it mean sony logo still there even i remove the screen protector ?
[Sony Xperia ZL] sirsmokey:
yes it is still there. on the xperia z it does come off
[Sony Xperia ZL] jmarnell:
The screen film that comes stock on the Xperia ZL (as well as the Z) is not a screen protector...it is a film (protector) to help keep the glass from shattering. I have heard and seen the video where the kid decides to remove this level of protection. Why? Because he is crazy. I purchased the Skinomi Tech Skin screen protector (wet application) and installed it right over the stock film and it works beautifully. No degradation of the HD screen quality nor sensitivity of touch. Now, I have both a screen protector on top of the film to protect the screen from shattering as originally shipped from Sony.

I am not sure of the tempered nature of the Sony screens. Definitely not Gorilla Glass 1 or 2 but, I have heard it is from an Asian company that makes similar screens to Gorilla Glass (I thing it is called Dragontrail). I guess you could argue if the screen on the ZL was of the Gorilla Glass quality or better, the point would be mute, and no screen or shatter film protection would be necessary.

Good quality screen protector is a small investment to protect such a beautiful phone.
[Sony Xperia ZL] Ingvarr:
Sorry, but you are incorrect. It is a screen protector. In Japan, it is really common practice to sell phones with factory/service installed screen protector, because it saves person from trouble of trying to apply protector without dust getting under it, also adhesive could be used for more robust installation. So when somebody scratches theirs, they just pop in the service to get protector replaced instead of replacing whole screen - it saves company & user lot of costs.

This film protects glass from shattering to extent, but no more than any screen protector does. Its pointless to install second protector on top of it, this will only reduce backlight brightness & sensitivity (even if slightly).
[Sony Xperia ZL] keith777:
Whatever it is, it sucks. I've never had a screen protector before, the glass feels way better to me, and probably looks a little better. The thing that comes on here scratches so easy - all I ever do it set it down screen up or put it in my pocket with nothing else in that pocket. Not to mention the lint it attracts..

I ordered the Fusso smartphone stuff for applying an oleophobic coating, seems to have gotten mostly good reviews, when I get it i'm removing this screen protector. I'll post results when i'm done..
[Sony Xperia ZL] keith777:
So I removed the screen protector, wasn't hard at all just had to use a pin to get it started. To me, the glass feels way better and looks better. I applied the Fusso smartphone for adding an oleophobic coating last night. So far so good, after being on the phone a little bit this morning I saw some fingerprints and just used my shirt to wipe them off and they came right off - I guess the oleophobic coating is working, although it didn't seem bad even before I put it on the glass. Sony should really abandon the practice of putting a screen protector on new phones ( i don't think anyone else does), maybe include it, but this feels way better to me without it.
[Sony Xperia ZL] WendellGnR:
So... Sony logo really doesn't come off with the screen protector right? Good to know.

A question: Is the screen really scratch resistant? Searched for some videos and didn't find any screen scratch test, etc. I know you're not going to scratch your screen just to test it, but, do you leave it with keys, coins...? Would be glad to know if gets scratched easily or not. And when you take off the screen protector, is there any hard to remove glue on the screen?
[Sony Xperia ZL] Ingvarr:
What do you mean by "really scratch resistant"? Do you mean scratch-proof? Because its not, and there is no such thing as scratch-proof material. If you find something harder than glass, you can scratch it. Ordinary sand is the best example.

If you carry phone in pocket with keys (or in jeans pocket with studs which could contact screen when you move it from/to pocket), I recommend using screen protector.

To remove tackiness which could be left from original one, just use some alcohol to clean it.
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] SnowJim:
Hi,

The S3 LTE is now getting to a good price after the S4 release but is it still a good buy? The problems I see is that it will not get updates and if it does not get updates I suspect that there will be apps that is not possible to run. I have a phone about 2-3 years and I do not play that much on it but I need a stable, fast and flexible phone.

It is possible to install custom rom but there is really not anyone that will work perfect because Samsung is not releasing there code. Also, there might be even less roms to choose from when talking about the LTE version.

It will not be bought on contract.

Is the S3 still a good buy?
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] xXPr0XNinjaXx:
hi dear

I will highly recommend u to buy s4 because more roms more fast stable but if its very expensive u can still go with s3 and u can flash custom roms or just wait for samsung to bring the s4 features to s3.. Hope it helped:fingers-crossed:
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] SnowJim:
Pleas explain, how can S4 be worth about 277 EUR more then S3? And why should there be more roms for S4? Have Samsung decided to releas there code?
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] itsmillertime:
Hey guys, I just got a S3 off of craigslist and have T-Mobile service but still have an AT&T ROM so mobile hotspot, nav and other features aren't working. Is there a T-Mobile RUU available or would I be better off rooting it and going with a custom ROM?
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] itsmillertime:
So T-Mobile Rom on an AT&T device is ok?
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] zeushvk:
Like they have no problems..

Just being cautious.I'll flash and see one and update you!!
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] itsmillertime:
So far I've used the "SAMSUNG GALAXY S3 UNIFIED TOOLKIT V7.0" (http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1746682) to root and install CWM recovery. From recovery I successfully flashed Jelly Beans build 15 (http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1973982) and so far everything appears to be working well except for 4g. In the notification area I have "G" and then "3G" but no 4G even in areas where I could pick it up before flashing.

This is an AT&T S3 (i-747) and I used the i-747 image to root/ flash recovery via the toolkit and then flashed the Tmobile variant of Jelly Beans.
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] itsmillertime:
Figured it all out. Thanks to this thread I was able to successfully flash a T-Mobile i747 engineering rom (http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1771021) which also flashed the modem enabling TMo frequencies. Then I was able to reroot and flash a recovery meant for a t999 so in essence my phone is no longer an i747 but a t999 but with a radio that actually supports 4g/ lte. Basically what the new S3 Tmo is launching. My Jellybeans rom which was based off of a verizon build wouldn't allow 4g so I had to replace it with Darthstalker (http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2014442) which I haven't played around with too much yet but so far is awesome (native tethering works, one of my complaints about other roms). Ah 4G is nice, hit 12Mbps down... So long Sprint... So long Evo "4G"
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] mykull:
thank you for the info! very helpful :)
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] Fatty1212:
What area are you, where you get those dl and up speeds? Thanks for the links! :)
[Kindle Fire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] fiddlefaddle:
Hello guys.. I am not new to the kindle fire 1st generation... however this time its different.

I went from ICS back to stock... but it bricked in the process. I tried different things in the KFU and the KF unbrick utility.

no luck.. PC sees the KF and it installed the drivers. but KFU doesnt see it at all. I did instal the drivers that came with the KFU.

any ideas would be great. thanks
[Kindle Fire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tobiascuypers:
All little more specific instead of "it just bricked" did you notice everything different? Still have FFF? Try to see it in fast boot?