yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[One (M7) General] Ludacrisvp:
I've found an app that seems to be working OK.

Its called light flow and its in the play store.

You can have the green LED or the red LED or both of them on together creating an odd color at different angles, it is orange when looking directly at it but some angles you will only see red and others only green. It also allows some control of the capacitive lights as part of the notification as well.

It can be a complex app to use and you might need to have a rooted device to use all the options.
[One (M7) General] paky79:


---------- Post added at 07:16 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:15 PM ----------

Are you to set the timeout?
[One (M7) General] skyline72:
Any battery calibration app to recommend ?
[One (M7) General] paky79:
Ok understand but trying lightflow application I'm not able anymore to Swype to unlock. I noticed that with the application on the Swype is disabled e phone is unlocked with just one touch...maybe some unknown bug :(
[One (M7) General] Bhavpreet:
red + green does not make yellow, it makes brown, so having them both flash at the same time would produce a very odd colour based on the angle. You really only have two options, red or green, unless it is a multi-led and htc decided not to implement it (which i doubt)

its well known that the One takes a long time to go from 99 to 100%, theres nothing wrong with your battery. It takes long, upto 30 minutes long sometimes, and isnt really neccesary since you can unplug your phone at 90% and keep it healthy.
[One (M7) General] flashflash:
I have used Tasker. Notification triggers a event that refreshes the led light every 5 mins. Keeps it flashing until you unlock the phone. Works perfectly.

Coming from a S3, I can't believe HTC still has this stupid 5 minute timer. I thought it was crap when I had a desire.
[One (M7) General] maverick1103:
It's an accessibility feature, I installed floating notifications app the other day and I had to enable it in the accessibility settings menu, as soon as I turned it on the Swype up to unlock stopped working and you only had to touch anywhere to unlock the screen. I emailed the dev who explained it was a HTC bug, so hopefully they will fix this on the up and coming update.
[One (M7) General] Ludacrisvp:
No. Red and green light will make a yellow to yellow orange color. Mixing light is not the same as paint. This is how LCD TVs work, they have red blue and green light that is used to make all of the colors.

Light flow allows you to have both LEDs on together making what the application calls dark amber.

If there is a blue led as well nobody has found it yet.
[One (M7) General] goguxxx:
Mine just goes red when charging or battery low and green on notifications. Stuff like lightflow doesnt even work for me.
[One (M7) General] THUDUK:
Is it just me, but I can hardly see the tiny little notification light
[One (M7) General] Ludacrisvp:
Its not just you. Its a bit too stealthy for me which is why i have used light flow to enable the capacitive button lights to be additional notification LEDs.

Likely need to have root and enable the compatibility mode and direct control mode in the app.
[One (M7) General] asdqwe143:
It would be better if we can costumize the color of the LED,like blue and green for diferrent notifs and red for charging

Sent from Htc one - RGUI v2 using xda-developers app
[One (M7) General] cschmitt:
FYI, on CM you can customize the notification LED per app. The LED only responds to red and green RGB color values, for example if you set 0x0000FF then the LED doesn't illuminate at all. If you set 0xFFFF00 then it simply blinks red. From my testing, it appears that there is a red and green LED (or bi-color) and only a one of the two colors can be 'on' at a given time.
[One (M7) General] all2i:
I dont think there is any other colours.
[One (M7) General] bun_b:
How to set the tasker to make it work?? It's too complicated to me...

please help

:(
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] boonwuilow:
Hi guy...

I am trying to port some custom rom from other device which share similar specification for example, screen res, processor and gpu to X10 Mini Pro

Now my target are some rom from Galaxy Mini or LG Optimus Me by following this tutorial http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1908008

After I follow every instruction on that tutorial, i can flash the ROM on recovery with no prob, but the phone stuck on nAa kernel screen...

Can anyone guide me on what is required in X10 mini Pro in order for the phone to boot up?

I have try deleting the apps, fonts, framework and media and replacing them from port rom folder as shown on the tutorial...

Are there anything which are specific to X10 Mini Pro that should not be delete?

My current kernel is nAa 14 ...

My base rom would be MiniCM7 http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1415026

And the rom i am trying to port is LG UI 3.0 (based on CM7) from LG Optimus Me http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1995399
[Sony Ericsson XPERIA X10 Mini] Enthydor:
Shouldn't this thread be in the Q&A section? Not in General.
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] pinsicchio:
can anybody upload me the sms apk from cm9? thanks
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] x102x96x:
Hi

Is there any tool for nexus devices on PC like pc companion or kies or HTC sync???

Sent via my Sony Xperia Z | C6602
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mihahn:
What do you wanna do with that tool?

Backup is in the cloud via your google account, updating goes over the air and repairing/reflashing stock rom goes via a nexus toolkit (check xda dev or general section). What else? :)

Sent from my SK17i running stock ics (.587)
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] x102x96x:
Official nexus toolkit from google

Sent via my Google Nexus 7 | 32GB.WiFi
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] justlaxin13:
Just wondering if there is a specific answer as to whether the IR blaster will/can work in custom ROMs.I have read/heard that in some ROMs, like CM 10.1 I believe, that it doesn't work "yet". So should I assume that it's catch-as-catch-can?

For full disclosure, I'm still using my N4 but am strongly considering grabbing an S4, primarily because I can't stand the N4 battery life anymore, want LTE again ( I had an S3 briefly) and a better camera would be nice. But, I will almost certainly root and flash something more stock but definitely want to keep the IR functionality.

Thanks in advance for the help.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] snakecharmer23:
It's highly unlikely that custom non-TouchWiz roms like CM10.1 will be able to use the IR blaster. I'm hopeful that the upcoming Google Edition of the GS4 will have functionality so it can be ported to AOSP roms.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] justlaxin13:
Really? I'm not a developer by any stretch, but does that mean that they have no way of accessing the hardware? What if you were to use a 3rd party remote app, like Peel?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] C13v3r0n3:
Push the SamsungWatchOn app to your phone and see if it works.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] thacounty:
It doesn't. I tried it. There are no drivers for the IR Blaster. I would say unless the Google edition has it we are SOL. No apps work it that I tried, and I tried most all of them in the Play Store.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] eskomo:
The Google edition of the S4 will not use the Samsung apps or make use of some of the hardware from what I understand. No S-view or gestures or temp sensors or IR or any of that. Which is a huge bummer if you ask me. We don't need T-Wiz but make use of the hardware and capabilities at least.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] ZPaul2Fresh8:
Just do yourself a favor and download Smart Remote. Problem solved.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] snakecharmer23:
I'm no dev either.... but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night!

I'll be keeping my fingers crossed that the Google version won't leave half the hardware useless.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] freebee269:
my comment is not to bash, it's just my opinion. i get that people want to run stock android because they are used to it from other devices or they may just like the look and feel of it. i like stock android also, just not on my gs4. there is hardware on this phone that stock android can not take advantage of. like all the sensors and aspects of the camera. i just cant bring myself to have stock android knowing that i paid for a phone that can do other things yet i cant use those other things. i dont know what the google edition of gs4 will have, but something tells me it will just be like us putting an aosp rom on our devices right now and not having the drivers to take advantage of the other aspects of the phone hardware. makes me feel like why did i buy this phone with these sensors on it if i cant use them? i should have instead got a different phone that has a 1080p screen with a quad core cpu with ext sdcard, minus the extra gs4 hardware that makes it unique, so that the stock android can take full advantage of.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] @rbiter:
What about touch squid? Does that work?

Sent from my GT-N7100
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] freebee269:
no ir blaster driver in rom = no app that can run the hardware. needs to be a touchwiz based custom rom. like mdob rom.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] Thermalwolf:
I'm 100% positive they will make use of the IR Blaster or atleast include simple drivers for developers to run with.

Let me make this clear, Samsung is NOT going to produce the device with an IR device on the developer edition if they don't plan on giving Google drivers. As if Samsung is gonna waste money on perfectly good IR Blasters to never ever be used....

It's either gonna have the IR Blaster and have simple functionality, or the hardware will be scrapped to save money.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] dligon:
WELL you might as well cross your fingers, toes, eyes, and hold your breath.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] deppy:
Samsung includes an 'irda' driver in their open source, isn't that the driver? If that's the case, couldn't someone compile that driver into a kernel and then we could use apps like Smart Remote?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] polish_pat:
No rom will work if the Samsung Framework is not installed. If it were as easy as just installing the IR driver in the ROM, i'm pretty sure all roms would be compatible with it by now, or some dev would create a patch for it
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] sabre31:
Nothing to see here you need Touchwiz to use it. I would not bet on the Google edition having it. Google will not have all the bells and whistles like everybody things.

You need ir blaster stick with stock rom and forget the rest.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] deppy:
The framework is definitely needed for stuff like WatchOn or anything that calls the IR Blaster through the framework, but an app like SmartRemote that calls the hardware directly through the drivers wouldn't need the framework.

I didn't look too much at the irda drivers but I an fairly certain that one could just compile support for that in and if the app is non-samsung that the support should be there the same as any external ir blaster.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] flinttownbrown:
I doubt the actual hardware will be scrapped. This would require a change to their hardware manufacturing process which will be a costly change for them. It seems that the Qualcomm S4s are almost completely identical less firmware and software changes, which would occur after the hardware build.

Because the production volumes of the S4 are so high, the cost of adding these sensors is probably trivial, either cents or fractions of a cent per unit. Changing the production lines to modify the manufacturing, after all of the labor, QC, etc., is likely to cost more per phone than simply including the part, at least at the production volumes we can reasonably expect to see.

Given the volumes on this edition of the S4 will most likely be nowhere near the volumes of the ATT or VZW standard models, the cheapest way for Samsung to create this SKU would be to re-badge the existing hardware with the vanilla software. After all, this is exactly what they did with the i337m.

Of course, this doesn't guarantee drivers will be available for the IR. However, this model is targeted to the enthusiast market, and they would likely see sales of the new SKU cannibalized by other models if they didn't include basic functionality.

After all, why would I buy the Google edition with no IR support when I can go buy the T-Mobile model, with a choice of carrier subsidy, if the end result is essentially the same? I could just buy that one and flash CM10 or equivalent if I don't get IR either way, and I can get that from my friendly neighborhood retail outlet.

Since this model seems to be marketed to enthusiasts, the amount of loss they would sustain by not including an IR driver could be substantial enough that it wouldn't make economic sense to have created the additional SKU in the first place.

Again, this is all speculation, but this is where I'd place my bet. Now watch, since I've stated this, Murphy's Law will kick in and I will be completely wrong...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] zelendel:
Well if the follow the HTC model the IR blaster will just be disabled

Wayne Tech Nexus
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] thacounty:
Exactly. They just announced it wouldn't work because stock Android doesn't support IR.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] polish_pat:
the drivers are closed source, so if they are not integrated in the framework, they wont work
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] djdef80:
I was really bummed out to hear that I couldn't use S Health in the slim rom. I'm new to flashing custom roms. Can you explain why the hardware drivers from TW roms can't be loaded on asop roms? Do the drivers not work like regular Linux drivers?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] zelendel:
No all the drivers are closed sourced. Unlike the open source drivers that linux offers for most hardware. Like my laptop. There is no Open source driver for my lan card so no internet in Linux.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] djdef80:
So the drivers need to be recompiled for the different kernel in asop, and because the source is closed on the drivers we are sol. Is that about the gist of it?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] zelendel:
Pretty much as the AOSP kernel is not compatable with the closed sourced drivers. Unless they open the drivers we are SOL until open source drivers are made and released. I dont see this happening anytime concidering the GE version of the HTC has the IR disabled and I have a feeling most of the sensors on the GS4GE will be the same.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] polish_pat:
the drivers themselves are closed sources, they will work if samsung frameworks is included in the rom, which means that only stock touchwiz based roms are compatible with the features exclusive like S Health, thermometer and IR blaster
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] wdouglass:
I think our only chance is IR Blaster support in 4.3. Both recent 'google edition' phones have the hardware. There is a rumored nexus coming in the next 6ish months which, fingers crossed, has IR hardware

This is all speculation, but I think the chances of this happening are pretty high in my opinion. Here's to hoping...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] skullassfreak:
It seems like quite a waste that they wouldn't include drivers. It would be more of a "nexus (4)" experience tho haha
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] zelendel:
Oh I have a feeling that the nexus will have all the new sensors that are available like all the ones in the S4

Wayne Tech Nexus
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshootin] Cusa:
We can't have best of both worlds. I hate the living crap of touch wiz and I want to be on cm10.1 so bad but I can't live without all the cool features that stock ROM has.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337
[HTC Inspire 4G] greece forever:
hello gyus..my first post so im asking sorry for everything.....;););)

ihave a full rooted inspire 4g bought from usa....but inpite all my effods i cant get a 4g sisnal even 3g...only edge...and unfortunatelly with all the roms i have used...and i used a lot.is there any solution for my problem???im from europe greece and my carrier is cosmote..i double checked my apn settings...my carrier cant help me cause they dont understand why my phone does that....help me please and i will hit the thanks button as many times as you like:p:p:p:p:good::good:
[HTC Inspire 4G] enigma2446:
The inspire will toggle between 3g and H to conserve battery. Kinda like a on demand thing when needed it will switch. You can try and download tweakker from the market and pick ur carrier and let it do its thing and see if that helps.

< Coming to you live from the planet One X >
[HTC Inspire 4G] greece forever:
I have tryied this but it couldn't help me.its not a apn problem...my settings are surely correct.Does anyone knows how to configure my radio or my signal bandwidth with built.prop?..is there a way to configure my signal bandwidth so I can.least get a 3 g signal?
[HTC Inspire 4G] enigma2446:
Let me ask you this do u get any signal at all? Or a x where the bars are?

< Coming to you live from the planet One X >
[HTC Inspire 4G] greece forever:
I have signal my friend but its always edge or 2g....I can't get 3g signal or internet connection with 3g signal....only edge or gprs

So when I use data connection my internet just sucks.....
[HTC Inspire 4G] enigma2446:
Under network settings are toy set to gsm only? Or gsm/cdma auto?

< Coming to you live from the planet One X >
[HTC Inspire 4G] greece forever:
Wcdma /auto or CDMA preferred...
[HTC Inspire 4G] enigma2446:
Ok seeing that the sim door is part of the radio itself for the antenna u could have bad connecting points. I had had no bars and hardly any data till I replaced the back door cover. Or u could mod it with some copper strip. I hit a new door on ebay for 3 bucks

< Coming to you live from the planet One X >
[HTC Inspire 4G] greece forever:
I did it but this haven't fix my problem...does anyone knows how to configure the settings of 4g with built prop editor?or someother kind of solution?
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] jmro20:
My phone's hardware buttons (menu, back, home, search) are not working. I want to know if there is a rom that I could install that will let me use the soft keys (on screen buttons)? Is there a way to fix this?

Thanks!!
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] richardlibeau:
Sounds like a hardware issue but they do have roms you can use pie or nav bar options. Try cm 10.1 rom, aokp, anything jellybean.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] hatememarkz:
What ROM u using try the madaco xposed toolbox they have a mod that will give u soft keys

linaro cm10.1

uber 1.1

like a rokc ;) :thumbs up:
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] jmro20:
Currently T-Mobile Stock ROM Jelly Bean 4.1.2 Baseband T989UVMC6 unrooted. I have never installed a custom rom or rooted it.what Rom and Mod will you suggest.

Thanks
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] richardlibeau:
Go to development thread and you will find roms, kernels, recovery, and root options
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] jmro20:
I've been looking into the development section but I don't know what rom to install. I can't find one that says that you can have the soft keys. Please help!! If someone is using a ROM that allowed the use of on- screen navigation keys on this phone please let me know.

Thanks!
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] meekrawb:
AOKP 4.2.2 and Slimbean 4.2.2 both have soft buttons for sure. The rest of the 4.2.2 ROMs probably have it too.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] jmro20:
I'll try that and let you know.

Thanks again!
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] richardlibeau:
Thanks for helping him out I was busy and couldn't answer.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] JoeGrimm:
Button Savior is an app on the market that will give you the option for soft keys that will be on the screen, the really nice thing about this app is it works on any rom and has a hide tab feature so that you don't have to give up any screen space.

play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.smart.swkey&hl=en
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] jmro20:
I installed slimbox rom and it is working for me. Thanks all for the help.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] hatememarkz:
Bro it's slim bean don't disrespect the beanz :D:thumbup::p

ss beanz T989
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] jmro20:
my bad!!

Ups!! My bad Slim Bean!! Nice rom by the way!! And the soft keys working great!!
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] baz:
Hi I just got SynCE 0.90 working fine with kernel 2.6.x

In case you didn't know synCE is the linux (open source) version of Activesync

homepage at http://synce.sourceforge.net/

I used this with pocket PC 2003SE on blueangel

It also works fine with synce-kde, just like activesync

here is the updated snippet from the wiki:

I ran it on a 2.6.9 kernel and I added this to my ipaq.h:

(look for this)

#define HTC_VENDOR_ID 0x0bb4

#define HTC_WALLABY_ID 0x00ce

#define HTC_HIMALAYA_ID 0x0a02

(new part here)

#define HTC_BLUEANGEL_ID 0x0a05

(end new part)

And this to my ipaq.c (/usr/src/linux/drivers/usb/serial/)

(look for this)

{ USB_DEVICE(HTC_VENDOR_ID, HTC_WALLABY_ID) },

{ USB_DEVICE(HTC_VENDOR_ID, HTC_HIMALAYA_ID) },

(new part here)

{ USB_DEVICE(HTC_VENDOR_ID, HTC_BLUEANGEL_ID) },

(end new part)

In the ipaq_id_table to be precise.

hope this helps (and the wiki is updated when online)

Barry
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] Guest:
Uau!!!

Do you know is everything is syncable? (calendar, contact,..)
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] onurd:
cannot make it work under suse 9.1 kernel 2.6.8.x

I've been trying to make Syncce under Suse 9.1 with kernel 2.6.8.x work. But no luck. Any suggestions or tips?
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] baz:
synce can sync with kde using Multisync. http://synce.sourceforge.net/synce/multisync_guide.php

I havn't used it myself, but I read good things.

As for the problem with Suse 9.1 with kernel 2.6.8.x you would have to be more specific.

did you modprobe usbserial and ipaq after modifyig the source, rebuilding the kernel, and rebooting?

If you did all of the above and you still have problems then post your dmesg output with the above loaded and the device pluged in.
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] metnik:
cool! is this bluangel specific or could work also with xda-mini, ...?

Do u use synce with usb or bluetooth? tnx
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] baz:
you will ned to get the device id for the mini to make it work, but thats easy

the blueangel is 0x0a05, you see this when you use the tool usbview

click on ipaq, and then look for

Product Id: 0a05 (this will say a different device id)

change the above code, and replace the device id of the mini.

I have successfully used both bluetooth and usb to sync my pda.

check out http://synce.sourceforge.net/