yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] triavq:
Im not overcloecked and I get 60 fps. have you updated to the lastest 0.81?

here are my settings:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] niikko:
Yes, I have the last Ver of ppsspp (downloaded today 06/27)

With your config i'm getting 45-50 fps with frameskipping on, and 30-34 without frameskipping, and i am having this "lag" problem with other games like Modern Combat 3, Dead Trigger, etc... can be a modem/radio issue?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] triavq:
Hmmmm... What rom are you using? I'm using the stock telus jb ROM with the at&t modem. Are you sure you're not interchanging vps vs fps? I get 60 fps and ~45 to 60 vps, but it still runs smooth enough that I would play it. I'll make a short video later tonight so you can see how it runs on my note. Try closing all your running apps before you play it.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] niikko:
Sorry, Sorry Sorry, I'm confusing, i'm talking about the VPS... not FPS, i reach to 60 FPS but with VPS at 30-50 isnt very smooth...

i'm using the Padawan JB v2 ROM...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] triavq:
Ahhh OK. My vps dips to 30 sometimes, like when a match just starts. But its usually around 50 and that's fairly playable IMO. If you are using the phase kernel, try overclocking and see if you get better results. Although I don't think it would male much of a difference. If the phase kernel can oc GPU then it might make things run smoother
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] niikko:
Can overlock the GPU? HOW?! XD, since i installed i'm trying to OC the GPU with the "Trickster MOD" APP, that's included with the ROM, and i'm using that kernel (phase kernel) and these app always return the "OC" to 266 when i apply the changes... i tried to OC at 300 and 320, always same problem...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] triavq:
I haven't personally used the phase kerenl so if the oc isn't sticking, try looking around the padawan thread for a solution
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] jonno95:
I'm worried about the losing the exploit that gives us the ability to flash roms. Does anyone know how to disable the OTA in a stock rooted rom. I think this is how they did it for the S3

My guess is that my question will be updated by djrbliss on his original thread soon, so maybe nm.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] Neuspadrin:
I froze FWUpgrade.apk and renamed /etc/security/otacerts.zip to otacerts.zip.bak. Anything I missed? Not sure my method is right.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S 4] Proweedsmoker:
Edit: Damn you guys respond fast! I will try Neuspadrins method also...

Edit2: Found this idea while browsing my favorite rom dev site... Dunno if this works or not, but I haven't seen any I'll effect yet. ..

In the system/app folder, rename the file wssyncmlnps.apk to .apk.bak

Is not the same file he suggested for the AT&T version, but its dang close.

All credits go to Scotts rom.com (sscroler) here I think is How'is spelled... Just wanted to share.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] chalmar81:
Sorry if asked before but I didn't find an answer so I need some help. I have a galaxy note 2 through sprint. I have rooted it so that I could flash roms. The roms I used weren't that great and I only flashed it so I could wifi tether and get better reception. My problem is I just unrooted my phone back to stock because I saw an ota update that I wanted but when I try to accept the update the loading bar reaches half way and stops. My phone is back to original stock 4.1.2 baseband LJ1build is MA7 and kernal is back in jan 29 2013.The android that has his door opened while the update is loading ends up having a red triangle sign with a exclamation point inside which I think means error. I just want to know if kies will work or did I do something wrong and what steps do I take to fix it. My phone is a great phone but I have missed calls and text messages and data hangups alot. I've updated my prl and profile but no dice on fixing my reception. My friend called while i was im front of her and my phone never rang not once but it was ringing on her end before it went to voicemail. Sorry for long story just wanted to give as much info to help answer questions for troubleshooting. Please reply. Thank you.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] patrao_n:
which recovery do you have? if you turn the phone off and then hold volume up, the home button, and power button until recovery comes up. what do you see?

sent from my bad a$$ note 2
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] mr pnut:
K if your baseband is lj1 and build number is ma7 your not on original stock,root your phone again and go to this link im going to post for you follow the directions and you would be back to original stock update version mc2

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2086769
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] chalmar81:
Ok I'll try it and let you know the results. Thanks.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] neebi007:
Actually you are not back to stock or unrooted. You need to find the original stock ROM then flash your phone with Odin from PC.

:*: Neebi :*:

--------------

Hit Thanks if I could be any help.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] chalmar81:
stock recovery
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] chalmar81:
I tried it and it worked. I'm on stock and my baseband and build is MC2. My kernal is updated to. My signal still sucks but i think it's sprint. Once i get off of work i will update prl and profile and see what other steps i can take to improve it. I have one more question? What's the best rom that uses stock and touch wiz and deletes bloatware and increases performance? Also is MC2 the latest update and if not what is? Thanks again for helping me!!!:good:
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] mr pnut:
Nice...glad to see you got it, but there's only two roms that are base off the new update mc2 me personally will go with synergy Rom it's smooth,fast & and good on battery life.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] laj13:
Just in case you still cant recieve calls you may have to call sprint and have them send a "refresh" signal to your phone. Read the post below. I had a problem similar to this one.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=41856780
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] chalmar81:
I sold my note 2 from sprint cancelled my service and bought a s4 from tmobile. I went to sprint in my area and they told me the towers were the problem and they didn't know how long it would take to fix it. They gave me a card with a number that resends a signal to my phone but no credit was issued to my bill so I left them.
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] Delfin:
Hello together,

because I want to work with Voice-Dial controlled from a BT-Headset, I try to find a solution for upgrading the BT-stack.

Also would this allow to use BT-Headset for music and video....(Mediaplayer,etc.)

Did anyone have an idea in which way we can integrate a headset-profil??

May be, anyone can post the related files and registry-entries from a other device, that uses Widcomm/Broadcom-Stack.

Thanx

Delfin
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] :
Handsfree - would be nice for the BMW Car BT as well

Yes, the handsfree Profile in the MDA III is missing and it hurts badly. I can't make it work with my BMW BT Carkit.

Does anyone know how to integrate Handsfree into the MDA III?
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] gratefuled:
I alos would like to see this get fixed.

Just before this site had technical difficulties and lost several weeks worth of posts, there was a thread on this very topic.

It seem to me that progress was being made, but the current BT Profile only allows for Phone audio, not audio from device.

Even the not so good iPAQ 6315 had audion from device support.

I suppose first that I-Mate should fix the BT Profile all together, which is unstable on my PDA2K.
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] Nighthawk:
Just to clear this up....

The PDA2K does have handsfree profile. The profile only supports handsfree for phone.

What everyone is asking about is the ability to transfer audio from device to a bluetooth device (headset etc.). Is this profile called handsfree or something else, have read posts where someone mentioned it was called a different profile name?
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] babj615:
...Hmmmm....

In a recent online conversation with a "club i-mate" tech rep- I asked about the so-called "Hands Free" profile they advertise the PDA2K as being compliant with....

ME: "My other bluetooth phone would allow me to simply speak the contacts name via my wireless headset and the phone would dial.....With my PDA2K I have to actually use the phone to dial out.......This is not a 'TRUE Handsfree OPeration'....."

Club i-mate: "True."

ME: "So the PDA2K doesn't really support 'Hands Free' profile as advertised, but rather ONLY 'Headset' profile?"

Club i-mate: "Yes."

I have been VERY pleased with all of my PDA2K EXCEPT for the Bluetooth functions. They totally dropped the ball with the Bluetooth on this device....
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] Nighthawk:
Interesting news.

Have you tried with voice software on the PDA2K?

Tomorrow (Saturday night now) I will break out the car kit and headset and see what I can learn. The car kit (nothing special, just Supertooth) allows both headset and handsfree, different button combo to activate.
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] babj615:
Yes, I have Microsoft Voice Command on my PDA2K.

However, It requires activation by pressing a button on the PDA2K- and will only accept voice commands directly- via its own microphone- It will not activate/accept speech via a wireless headset, like ALL my previous bluetooth phones....

Again, this is not a true hands free mode- and it is entirely a limitation of the firmware/bluetooth radio stack Carrier Devices is using in the PDA2K at this time....

...for instance, with my SE T610, I could leave my phone in my jacket pocket or briefcase- in the trunk of my car, and still activate/voice dial anyone in my contact list simply by pressing one button on my wireless headset....

...as well, I could accept incoming calls just the same, as a tone would be heard in the headset, and a single press would accept the call. The PDA2K will not allow this. My PDA2K will not automatically find/activate my headset when an incoming call is made- it wont even let me use the headset 'unless' I have an active link to it- but when you keep an active link to ANY bluetooth headset and turn the unit off, it will repeatedly turn itself back on and run the battery nearly dead in a couple hours. I discovered this the hard way.

ABSOLUTELY USELESS bluetooth software in the PDA2K.....
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] d3vil:
I'm using SE HBH60 headset with Qtek 9090, if i receive a call and bt headset is off, i can just simply turn it on and press the button on the headset and the call is answered...If it's on already, i hear a ring in the headset and can answer the call by just pressing the button in the headset.
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] babj615:
"...simply turn it on AND press a button on the headset and call is answered..."

Would you care to exaggerate here?

When I recieve calls, if I do not have an active link to my bluetooth headsets, I cannot answer with them... I must first go inot bluetooth manager and click on headset and click on 'connect'- which can take more than a few seconds each time I do....

I have tried this woth my Motorola, several Bluespoon's and my in-car handsfree system.... None will work unless the connection was made 'live' before the call, and then the PDA2K will not stay shut off, thus draining the battery...........
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] Nighthawk:
I think part of problem is the required button press, which isn't required on your other phones.
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] :
BlueAngel and BT Headset

When you have your bluetooth headset connected and the PDA enters the standby mode (for example, you don't use it for few minutes), if you receive a call does the headset automatically reconnect?

I'm using 9090 with Nokia HDW-3 BT headset, and I'm in trouble when I put my PDA in stand by leaving BT activated and the headset connected. It seems that after few minutes of standby the headset disconnects, but PDA's BT led is still flashing... Maybe is there any power saving feature in PDA's bluetooth stack so when in standby it disconnects the headset?
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] irblinx:
BMW bt car kit

The Xda IIs works fine with handsfree profile BT devices (such as car kits), I have personally tried it with a BMW built in jobby (X5) & a Nokia ck 7w. It also works fine with BT headsets.

I can only assume that the other providers/networks have made the same mistake that O2 did with the XdaII, i.e. use the Microsoft BT stuff which does NOT support hands-free, only headset profiles.

Perhaps one of the clever folk on here can suggest a way to get the O2 version on your phones?
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] :
Also microsoft voice command does not support activation by bluetooth headsets, its not a fault of the imate, just no software to accept the voice dial command from the bluetooth headset
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] Looking Glass:
BMW BT with XDAII?

Would you please irblinx be more specific about how have you been able to made ANY kind of call through your XDAII?

My BMW series 5 built in BT hands free simply fails to Connect to the XDAII. I'm carrying a SE T68 just to use my car hands free system. Stupid way of using an 1000+ $ BMW extra.

Any help is wellcome!

:?
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] irblinx:
some confusion here (at least partly due to O2 giving the new model a confusing name!), the xda II does NOT work with car kits.

Only the new IIs works
[MDA III, XDA III, PDA2k, 9090 General] Magellano:
Headset profile for PDA2K/9090

Sorry for my poor English :cry:

I need "HEADSET profile" for my PDA2K

Now all headset work with headset and hands free, but i nead "force" the headset mode with PDA2K

In headset mode (no hands free) I can use one headset for more devices, like PDA2K, notebbok, cellular phone.

In hands free mode the headset work with a device at time.

Regards
[Sony Xperia ZL] nutzuTo:
Seams like the new update screw up the GPS because now it takes more than a min to lock in the GPS before was so fast like within seconds :( anyone has the same problem??is there a way to fix the gsp??
[Sony Xperia ZL] Linwood.Ferguson:
No issue at all C6506 USA generic. Near instant before and after.
[Sony Xperia ZL] nutzuTo:
It may be the location :( cuz in downtown Toronto took me almost 2 min to lock in the GPS :(
[Galaxy Note 3 General] anonymous572:
This is my dream. Galaxy Note III or Note II with Google quick updates, like Nexus devices. Maybe some kind of petition to Samsung or Google will contribute for this?

Galaxy S4 Google Edition:

http://reviews.cnet.com/smartphones/samsung-galaxy-s4-google/4505-6452_7-35761621.html
[Galaxy Note 3 General] Elsydeon:
I can barely see this making sense on the S4, but I really don't think it'd make sense with the Galaxy Note series. If you strip away Touchwiz, you're left with a big screen, powerful hardware, and a S-pen that would have absolutely zero integration with the OS. I love stock Android, but being the Note is heavily centered around the S-pen, and S-pen is so deeply entrenched in Touchwiz, this is one case where I think I'd rather have Touchwiz.
[Galaxy Note 3 General] anonymous572:
One of the reason I use Note series devices is S Pen. It perfectly and 100% works with CyanogenMod ROMs, why this will not work with official Google ROM??? For now I'm not using any of Samsung apps, and I find that Quill is perfect replacement for S Note. And there are many cool apps for just drawing like Drawing Pad, Doodledroid, AirBrush and others. Also Handrite is nice app. Besides Android 4.x and above have full support for wacom pen.
[Galaxy Note 3 General] TigerDNA:
Because SPen is native in touchwiz framework.. Not just in 3rd party spps that support a stylus. In TW it works in any browser on the keyboard in any app and the button can be set for lots of thing. Note with out at least option for TW is dumb. Any I have never used my note for "art".

How many ROMs have you actually used?
[Galaxy Note 3 General] anonymous572:
Android itself support wacom stylus actions. It will fully work at clean Android as well as TW.

I used many different ROMs at Note and Note 2. CM\Paranoid\TW stock and custom and many others. My current ROM is in my signature.
[Galaxy Note 3 General] tuxonhtc:
Not really interested in AOSP ROM on Note devices - that's a downgrade as far as I'm concerned. For full functionality, it's de-bloated touchwiz based ROMs for me.
[Galaxy Note 3 General] sanke1:
There are AOSP ROMS which do have S-Pen functionality. Try those. Eg. Liquid Smooth 2.4
[Galaxy Note 3 General] sohebq:
I would better buying a nexus series phone rather than ruining my note 2 or 3. The samsung phones looks best with samsung adons. I used to hate touchwiz and only started using it since note 2 because of integrated features. So I will never have auch wish.

sent from: The New S-Pen :)
[Galaxy Note 3 General] mrBira:
Do you, or anyone else, know if it's possible to get stock camera functions (like recording in high speed and slowmotion) in aosp-based roms?

Skickat från min GT-N7100 via Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy Note 3 General] tuxonhtc:
Yeah not exactly. Those that are dependent on touchwiz framework (eg. screenshot, airview) are not available on any AOSP ROM. S Pen is functional on most ROMs, AOSP or otherwise, that's besides the point - hence the "full functionality" part.
[Galaxy Note 3 General] PJay_:
True but now with the S4 around we could say it more a Touchwiz feature than a S Pen feature, things like pressure sensitivity work well with apps that offer compatibility. To be fair, would still use a custom rom, even when it ships with stock hehe. So yeah, can do that now already.

What would be great are the revealed sources of some prop hardware modules.
[Galaxy Note 3 General] xdapao3:
I do hope that they will put out a "Google Edition" too but I will most definitely NOT buy it.

I DO like VERY MUCH Samsung added mods, apps, services, widgets, settings and personalizations (minus the launcher which I replace with Nova Launcher Prime).

I deactivate, of course, the few things which I don't use so they don't affect me in the slightest. I would have to do the same even on a "stock Android" for a few things anyway, so no gain/loss here.

The reason I want a Note III "Google Edition" to exist is very simple: if I keep a Note III for longer than it gets official Samsung updates and a major new version of Android with killer features comes out I can always flash the stock Android ROM! :victory:

Or, for example, it could still be getting updates but not for the new Android versions. It has happened with my old Galaxy S: in the end it was still being updated (heck, it is STILL getting new ROMs!!) but it never got ICS, the new ROMs are still GB based.

So both things may in fact happen. I kept my OG Note for 15 months, for example, which is a not so short time in the smartphone and mobile operating systems world...
[Galaxy Note 3 General] Gede:
Fine, a Note 3 Google edition.

Better even (for me) a 5,9 inch superfast phone without pen and gimmicks.

First thing I do is install Nova so I can reach all my apps from the homepage and disable as much unwanted / unneeded stuff as I can. (My S2 looks the same as my Note 2 now) and use (g) mail, g calendar, news apps, browser(s) nav progs, FB, and some utils.

But I am not a S penner.

I just have the note for size and speed. No pen or touchwiz needed.
[Galaxy Note 3 General] Sandata:
Omg shut up samsung, take my money and give me note3 nexus edition & it would be nice if its golden and active edition. Ill jiust wait for this every year now and then :)

_____________________

Via GT-N71OO using XDA_Elite_App
[Galaxy Note 3 General] abauer:
That idea of having a Google Edition I see as a downgrade compared to TW with Spen embedded in functionality almost everywhere, I just love the Spen, and make such an extensive use as I find it impossible now to do without it. As for a bigger screen, if they could manage to fit a bigger one on an size identical as GN2 that might be very tempting, if they decide to manage extra battery with a thinner body they already have my money, otherwise even if gn3 would be around by the time my gn2 will get broken, bcs it will, I would be buying again a gn2 if Samsung updates would continue.

Oh, I forgot, a plastic unbreakable screen, please that is just bs, unless the battery is flexible, the motherboard, etc etc, but who in their right mind would want to sell an indestructible device. Octa core, dodeca core, 24 core, lol, that is all bs to me, a Google edition 64 bit I would consider a real upgrade. But that might be some years away, maybe when GN5 would be around.

Peace.
[Galaxy Note 3 General] farfromovin:
I would buy a N3 Google Edition as soon as I possibly could. I love the options and no nonsense approach that AOSP has. Over the last couple versions, Nexus devices have always been a step down in the hardware compared to other Android devices.
[Galaxy Note 3 General] TigerDNA:
OP I think you're missing the point. A Honda Accord can drive on dirt roads but doing so won't let you experience all the car has to offer. Yes, the SPen WILL work perfectly fine with out TW but not having TW will cause a loss of functionality, period.
[Galaxy Note 3 General] anonymous572:
TouchWiz is a loss of functionality, speed and stability of normal Android ROM. There is no problem to port all S Pen features to clean Android ROM from Google.
[Galaxy Note 3 General] HellRa1SeR:
The only reason I've not migrated to other custom ROMs is beacuse of the Spen integration in Touchwiz. I really dont like TouchWiz but i do use it. :(
[Galaxy Note 3 General] tuxonhtc:
What functionality are you referring to exactly, that Touchwiz lacks and AOSP has? I have had next to no lags on most Touchwiz ROMs - and they're stable too. Obviously stock, unrooted is a touch laggy (i.e. notification lag, but that's it), but it's no issue once you switch to a good touchwiz based ROM.
[Galaxy Note 3 General] bharatgoyal:
Note 2 or note 3 google edition should be much much cheaper than the toichwiz versions .

Sent from my Note II

---------- Post added at 05:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:23 PM ----------

Which is a good touchwiz based rom that doesn't lag for our note 2? Which one do u use ?

Sent from my Note II
[Galaxy Note 3 General] Postal Psycho:
Please Samsung take my money. I don't know how long I'd hold out when the regular note 3 comes out. Please tell us ahead of time that there's going to be a Google edition so I don't go crazy. Sticking with my note2 until then.
[Galaxy Note 3 General] tuxonhtc:
I did use Project AOSP in the past with Perseus (did set responsiveness to a little higher) and had zero lags anywhere (except a small lag immediately after waking from deep sleep/booting up - which obviously is normal). Now I'm using X Note and there are really minor lag sometimes - but this is with floating multiwindows, so that's different. And I'm really being picky here.

Oh, and I never use touchwiz launcher, always used Nova obviously.
[Galaxy Note 3 General] daz_2000:
People like to slag off touchwiz because they think it makes them look cool. Touchwiz has improved no end.
[Galaxy Note 3 General] AlluXX:
True and not.... I loved Sense one time over anything but when tried Jb aosp roms, i realized how senseless that was.

Touchwiz is the same. Its great but some people just get bored with it, some not.
[Galaxy Note 3 General] tuxonhtc:
+1 - that does seem the case. Obviously it has it's share of flaws - but it offers plenty of functionality too. I really like AOSP - but all the touchwiz hate seems to be just "everything-except-AOSP-sucks" syndrome.
[Galaxy Note 3 General] sebtorres82:
I don't know, I (weird but true) like Touchwiz interface and features more than stock Android
[Galaxy Note 3 General] Postal Psycho:
Oh, the one thing keeping me from switching to AOSP on my note 2 is the lack of TV out. I would like to be able to use my MHL adapter for the tv. Samsung, please release drivers? Is note 3 going to be Exynos again?