yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] marjune23:
Tnx master [MENTION=3445281]pedestre[/MENTION] for the latest 4.13...will flash within today and will report back if there will be any issue...
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Andreas75k:
Confirmed here as well. At first I thought it was my fault for dirty flashing too many versions of NeatRom on top of each other, so I clean flashed and didn't restore anything, not even a single user app. Problem still there.

Apolo 4.12 and earlier works great, and I never before had any problem with light, regular or v0, but now even regular of 4.13 has this issue. I'm reverting back to 4.12 until there is a fix. But as 4.12 worked perfectly, not really a problem. :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pedestre:
OK, so the issue happens in sammy ROMS, I understood it was in 4.3.1, but I think is in Sammy.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Andreas75k:
Yes, it's Apolo 4.13 for Sammy 4.1.2 which causes problems.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Raagh:
why i would disagree with you? zzmoove/noop was my first choice ever on apolo kernel :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Karpfenhai:
Seriously? Do you count the downloads?

I should stop sharing the kernel locally, I have at least 4 others running your kernel.. and kk ifs rock stable for me...

Thx for not letting us down, I'll spread the word :D

Tapatalked from my Galaxy SII
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pedestre:
hahahaha, no, I don't count them, it is only the Google info about Apolo Configurator ..:)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] adipurn:
The problem on samy apolo 4.13
[Galaxy S II Android Development] tghandour:
Yes you should install 6.2 with weird numbers and alpha tags :D

Sent From My Galaxy S2

Running SlimSaber 4.3.1-05122013-r3p2-s3cfb

Powered by Apolo Kernel V6.2R-r3p2-s3cfb
[Galaxy S II Android Development] dox81:
Issue happens on my phone, also. Neatrom 5.3.1. Apolo 4.13 runs very smooth, and since I don't use tethering, all good for me :D seems that battery life is slightly improved...or maybe it's to soon to tell
[Galaxy S II Android Development] fedett92:
This is THE kernel for gs2.. No doubt.

Amazing battery life, even in performance profile, amazing performance and stability.. I can't ask for anything more.

Inviato dal mio GT-I9100 utilizzando Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pedestre:
OK, drivers issue.

Uploading 4.13 with the same drivers, now at least in my device hot spot works fine.

Sorry for the inconveniences, I didn't test hot spot, I always forget
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Zytrel:
Just flashed the current 4.13 light, it seems the current version replaces mali drivers, resulting in my phone being stuck on Samsung logo during boot.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pedestre:
Sorry, my mistake, reflash rom without wipes, I'm uploading right version right now

Edit:You've got the correct light version now online I think
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Zytrel:
Yup, current versions are working as expected. Thx.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Andreas75k:
New version working great, thanks!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Super-Bosnian:
need help!!!!

i am on BamRom 4.4.1 and can someone tells me how to choose wich kernel version to use... how can i check mali drivers version on my phone
[Galaxy S II Android Development] metalgearhathaway:
Cheers for the new release! Christmas has come early!

Testing on light 6.2 before trying other versions :good:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pedestre:
start with light or regular

about mali drivers version, check the op of the rom thread. New mali driver are usually in the main features

PLeasee read OP ¡¡
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Vahooli:
but if i dont need wifi whili my screen is off i turned that off , so i need that and it should be on :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pedestre:
If you don't use mobile data, I can't help you. Better WiFi on off works fine, turning off Wi-Fi with screen off, working 3g or 2g, but no Wi-Fi
[Galaxy S II Android Development] jenaplisken:
I dont understand. I use 6.1 with cyanogen. Can upgrade to 6.2? Or i risk something?

Inviato dal mio GT-I8190N con Tapatalk 4
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Karpfenhai:
[MENTION=3445281]pedestre[/MENTION], something had changed on today's cm11 nightly, we have the several thousand percent battery issue back.. can you tell how you fixed this in the first place and / or provide a patch?

Thx in advance.

Edit: from what I've read, this should be related to ramdisk size? Does it help?

Tapatalked from my Galaxy SII
[Galaxy S II Android Development] yavu:
Is here https://drive.google.com/folderview...&usp=sharing&tid=0B2vvNPeYi5c1R1dIQ0ZPbFIwZk0 know the fixed 4.13 kernel? If it get a new name 4.14 then it would be clear.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pedestre:
If they have changed the ramdisk, the only solution is building a new kernel with the changes.

Yes of course, both mirror and wuala have the fixed versions.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Karpfenhai:
So we are screwed, as well as all gustavo users, couldn't you guys merge your powers to get this fixed in no time? Synergy can lead to unexpected advantages... :D:cool:

Btw, it's not device specific, it affects all custom kernels on several device.

It's most likely related to the recent battery dock commits:

I

Or to this one --> http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/55465/

Hope you can make it before Christmas!

Edit: maybe there are just some values exchanged?

Thx!

Tapatalked from my Galaxy SII
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pedestre:
I'll try , but I can promise anything, because I'm not going to be at home for Christmas, so I won't be able to build anything.

I'll try this week to look into it, but I don't have too much time
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Karpfenhai:
You are truly a very nice person, thx again for your efforts, I'm sure the community will be grateful for that.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] txx3:
can someone give some Feedback if sammy 4.13 is more battery friendly then 4.12 ...i cant tell from the changelog ...if it's to early to say ..pls let me know

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II Android Development] yavu:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1682765&page=333
[Galaxy S II Android Development] txx3:
deep sleep is better, but rest is worse?...well i use my phone all the time deep sleep is secondary to me

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Mako0:
Hi guys, is possible to get softkeys lights after screen-unlock, and not after wake the phone??

I'm using a black background in lockscreen and if the softkeys were off, the effect will be more cool

Any suggestions??
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Mako0:
sorry double post..
[Galaxy S II Android Development] vrwmiaris1:
Hey guys which one is better from the 3 available ?I'm on slim Kat 4.4.2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] tghandour:
For KK 4.4.x you have to use none of the 3.. You have to use V7 instead.. :D

https://www.wuala.com/pedestre/Pruebas/?key=sOgZD3lrpfq2

Sent From My Galaxy S2

Running SlimSaber 4.3.1-05122013-r3p2-s3cfb

Powered by Apolo Kernel V6.2R-r3p2-s3cfb
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Karpfenhai:
But if you're currently using a build newer 16.12., wait for a new kernel that will appear soon.

The current one suffers the battery percentage bug due to recent ramdisk changes.

Regards.

Tapatalked from my Galaxy SII
[Galaxy S II Android Development] nutij3:
[MENTION=3445281]pedestre[/MENTION] hi! Can you tell me how to turn blnww on? I select it apolo configurator but nothing change, I try to set normal BLN too but don't working! I press save on boot every time and try to restart phone but nothing change, I'm on slimsaber 5/12 please help me, I use apolo 6.2, in apolo 6.1 I set blnww but don't know how I do it to make it work with notification. Thanks you for the attention!

Inviato dal mio GT-I9100 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pedestre:
OK bln issue, I think there is a bug in last version ramdisk ( 6.2). I'm going to fix it.

For now, you can do this to make bln work:

- Delete Apolo folder in /system (if it exists)

- Flash 6.1

- Reboot

- Flash 6.2 (it should work now)

Sorryyy

Edit: I think it only affects to 6.2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] myszonokr:
Apolo 4.13 - thanks for Christmas gift.

wytapatalkowane
[Galaxy S II Android Development] nutij3:
When 'im back to home i'll try, for now thanks you a lot!!!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pedestre:
beta 2 for Cyanogenmods kitkat 4.4.2. They go with Mali 3 drivers.

Thanks Karpfenhai for your help testing it

- fixed battery settings

- CWM stock recovery (restores fine)

Regards

https://www.wuala.com/pedestre/Pruebas/?key=sOgZD3lrpfq2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] roozbeh158:
Thanks.tuis version 4.13 very very smooth than old version.

I Install 4.13 ext v2 and underclock too 800 but my phone very very smooth.my home key before 4.13 heve buge but with 4.13 no buge.

Thanks
[Galaxy S II Android Development] txx3:
I got no buge (lol) with 4.13 thanks man!

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II Android Development] 089man:
Can I used this version for pound rom kitkat 4.4.2 based on cm?

What are the difficult between light, regular, v1.....im confused what the newest beta2?

I search very battery friendly settings.

I9100 Tapatalk 4, Rom1 Pound Rom 4.4 Kitkat
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pedestre:
Yes, I think you can (but I haven't tested). It is based in CM and have new mali patch included, so it should work.

About light, regular, etc, I recommend you read OP.

-----------------------------

By the way this Beta2 (remember for kitkat base CM) has included latest 6.2 changes (linux, bfq, wifi drivers, row)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Holgott:
Let me guess, that last beta is not for omni rom, right?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pedestre:
No, if you read carefully it says for CM based. As far as I know, the battery bug was in latest CM ROMS, but kernel for omni roms had new wifi drivers and linux update included. When I have to update OMNI for any bug, I will include bfq and row update.

Feedback about BETA 2 is appreciated,

Thankss¡¡
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Holgott:
Along that bln not being saved after reboot-bug, all is fine here with latest 7. kernel and omni, so no need to update.

TY Pedestre for your hard and genius work
[Galaxy S II Android Development] j1gga84:
Has 7.0 Beta2 for CM Mali v3 also s3cfb included as Beta1 ?

Regards
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pedestre:
Yes, of course, when I say mali v3, I mean everything screen and gpu drivers

Regards¡¡
[Galaxy S II Android Development] vrwmiaris1:
So on Slim i flash omni kernel?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Karpfenhai:
The kernel works just perfect, but it seems to use slightly more power on v1 as old beta did on v0 with my setup:

Maybe it's related to noop governor but I'll keep trying.

So far Pegasusq and row is giving me better battery backup, even better than slp/cfq.

Will report...

Btw, bln does work.

Tapatalked from my Galaxy SII
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pedestre:
Yes, it is on OP, for Slimkat you should use OMNI. Please follow the instrutions in OP about superuser and installation order

Regards ¡¡
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pedestre:
Added in wuala and mirror version 6.2b fixing the issue with BLN and WIFI in fresh installations (if you updated from 6.1 probably you haven't noticed anything, that's what happened to me :p).

Regards ¡¡
[Galaxy S II Android Development] joaonuno:
Pedestre,

I've installed 6.2b on latest pacman nightly (19-12) and it didn't boot. the phone shows the first 'logo' and before the boot animation it shuts down.

installed 6.2 again and it boots ok.

Don't know if it's rom or kernel related, but for the first time after flashing the rom a cyanogen setup appeared. maybe they did something new....

regards
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pedestre:
I can't tell you, bootloops are a pain the neck in aosp. I don't know why they happen.

Both kernels are identical except for the init script that is executed now
[Galaxy S II Android Development] 089man:
Hi, thanks for answer, I read all from op, but I don't understand what's version from beta2 folder I must take. V2, v1, v0, or light etc. with pound rom 4.4.2. Mali 3 cm based.

I9100 Tapatalk 4, Rom1 Pound Rom 4.4 Kitkat
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pedestre:
Did you read the voltages section? There, it is explained the different Apolo versions
[Galaxy S II Android Development] joaonuno:
strangely it was not a bootloop (i think) because the phone didn't restart it just switched off.

i will try installing again later to see if it was something i did wrong.

edit: flashed 6.2b over 6.2 (without kernel wipe script) and all seems ok
[Galaxy S II Android Development] 089man:
No, I read only the kitkat section with spoiler. I'm new here and it's first time with Apollo. Used only dori before and there is that all in one and no different kernels for undervolting etc. There are profiles that can changed...

OK now I understand, all on beta2 section are Mali3. Difficult is voltage settings.. Recommend is regular

I9100 Tapatalk 4, Rom1 Pound Rom 4.4 Kitkat
[Galaxy S II Android Development] metalgearhathaway:
Things run differently here to Dorimanx, nice to have two great kernels to pick from considering the age of this device! :good:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Jsilver73:
Hey [MENTION=3445281]pedestre[/MENTION] - please could you upload the cm11 builds with twrp if you have time? Carbon unofficial is due to start offering open delta updates but they will only work with twrp. Many thanks for your awesome work :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pedestre:
Probably you'll have to wait, my current twrp doesn't restore fine in kit Kat.

Tomorrow I'll try to dedicated some time to twrp but I'm not sure if I'll have enough time to finish it and on Saturday I'll start my Christmas vacations and I won't build anything till 2014
[Galaxy S II Android Development] michaelz93:
Noob question: Slimsaber 4.3 is not like 4.4 right? Apolo 6.2b can work normally?

Sorry for this question I'm just curious

Edit: By difference i mean biuld source or something like that, in 4.4 I know they use like omni, and in 4.3 the kernel is complety compatible right?

Enviado desde mi GT-I9100 mediante Tapatalk
[Galaxy S II Android Development] metalgearhathaway:
Just wondering how many people use the "Light" edition? Having tried the regular vs the Light version, I notice that as per the OP the undervolting on my model results in issues achieving and maintaining deep sleep. With the Light version I get the best ever deep sleep and therefore best battery life I have witnessed across all the many kernels I have tested.

On Dori kernel cpu check, I know that I have a group 3 device, which I believe is perhaps the most common model, therefore I simply wondered if all users that know they were group 3 cpu users, are they using light for best battery usage :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Zytrel:
I've been playing with the different versions for quite some time now, and ended up using the Light version.

The Extreme versions are just too much for my phone it seems, usually crashing or rebooting after around 3-5 days.

For some time then I went with the Regular version. It seemed to be running ok, but I encountered two crashes after an uptime of around 15-20 days. Sure, that's not much but still, I'm a stability freak and thus I'm now running the Light version for around two months now, without a single crash.

Battery wise I didn't see much difference between Regular and Extreme, but the Regular seems to drain a little bit less than Light. For me it's not that much of a difference that would warrant running the Regular instead of Light in trade for the chance (albeit small) of having the phone crash or reboot (which always happens at the worst time possible :laugh:)

In short, after a lot of tinkering I just stopped caring and went with the stock option. Those chip developers know their thing and I decided to trust that the values they chose just make sense. :)

EDIT: On a sidenote, I also rated group 3 with dori.

Regards,

zy.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Karpfenhai:
My device is group 2, im using v1 or v0, v2 doesn't even boot.

Never tried regular or light :D

Regards

Tapatalked from my Galaxy SII
[Galaxy S II Android Development] metalgearhathaway:
I'd really suggest to everyone that the Light version is port of call rather than the regular one :good:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] yavu:
I use apolo kernel 4.13 regular since some hours. Can you tell me how I can find out which group my device has? thanks
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Karpfenhai:
Afaik only dori's kernel with stweaks can show this, but no clue how reliable these figures are...

Tapatalked from my Galaxy SII
[Galaxy S II Android Development] yavu:
My device is almost 1 year old. It's one of the last produced equipment. Can it be derived from this?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] It_ler:
Thanks for the suggestion.

But what is good on your phone might be different on another one ;)

Samsung has change the chips even for the same S2 model during the production time, and every chip reacts a little bit different on undervolting.

BTW, I can only use light and regular versions on my phone.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] puckshock:
May I ask how you switched from Dorimanx over to Apolo?

I ran the GS2KernelWipe script, installed Apolo 6.2b Light, wiped cache and dalvik, and could not boot into Carbon 4.3.1. Tried reverting back to Dorimanx 9.43 and it wouldn't boot either.

I did see the 3rd post so I'm guessing you can't flash this kernel without a clean wipe?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] sien1996:
just want to ask are you using carbon linaro by infected(the one that he halted development on)? cause if yes like when i was using it there would be tons of times before on no matter what kernel ( i even tried stock) :( it just wouldn't boot up and stay on the carbon logo. cause i liked that rom.. wasnt too bloated and had the right amount of features :D well good luck hope you found a solution and hope you had a nandroid and a titanium backup of your apps and data... ouch..

Cheerio :D

Tapatalked from a S2 powered by Dorimanx kernel!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Karpfenhai:
I know it's OT, but if someone is interested in a special cm10.2 edition containing almost all useful carbon patches but not the full package, drop me a pm. But development has stopped, u have to take it as it is.

Tapatalked from my Galaxy SII
[Galaxy S II Android Development] tghandour:
Yah Apolo 6.2b is fully compatible and very stable with Slim Saber 4.3.1..

Sent From My Galaxy S2

Running SlimSaber 4.3.1-05122013-r3p2-s3cfb

Powered by Apolo Kernel V6.2R-r3p2-s3cfb
[Galaxy S II Android Development] yavu:
@ pedestre

Does samsung energy saving feauture function on apolo 4.13?

Does the regular and extreme versions cause bad gpu performance in cause of undervolting compared to stock values?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pedestre:
Samsung energy saving : I think the frequency part works, brightness I don't know (probably no). Never used this kind of features, I prefer to control them by myself

About UV, no, I don't think so

Regards¡¡
[Galaxy S II Android Development] TheGovernment:
Hello all.

Could anyone that has a working '4.13 Apolo Regular' version, provide me with their MD5sum?

Thanks.

PS. You can get it with root explorer (or their other file manager app that is FREE) by longpressing Apolo 4.13 Regular.zip and pressing 'properties'
[Galaxy S II Android Development] yavu:
82848f3c21a20edc4cf3b065072545ab
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Andreas75k:
Confirmed
[Galaxy S II Android Development] TheGovernment:
Thx guys.

Turns out i had different MD5, which would explain my bootloops :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Zytrel:
Deleted. Sorry.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pedestre:
Maybe your ROM is mali v2? In that case take a look to the OP, you have to flash a zip to update your ROM libs

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

More : OMNI - kitkat Beta 2 with TWRP recovery added to beta folder (super Beta, no tested enough)

https://www.wuala.com/pedestre/Pruebas/Betas kitkat (Android 4.4)/BETA2/?key=sOgZD3lrpfq2

Probably TWRP will be the only recovery in Apolo in the future (in AOSP), because is a touch recovery, it is quick and it restores flawless. I haven't tested enough but I have made two backups and I have restored them between 4.4 and 4.3 and everything was fine.

I haven't tested this version enough but I don't have more time to dedicate to this and I am officcially in my Christmas holidays (If I don't want that my wife kill me :laugh:)

Merry Christmas to you all ¡¡
[Galaxy S II Android Development] TheGovernment:
Actually the reason for my bootloops was only a bad download.

Now it's fixed and I'm using your regular apolo 4.13 version. :)

Merry Christmas to you too, mate! Wish you the best!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Karpfenhai:
Does it restore CWM backups?

Feliz Navidad mate!

Tapatalked from my Galaxy SII
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pedestre:
I don't think so, but I don't really know.

Feliz Navidad!!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] jomaga:
Hi Pedestre

I have a problem with 7.0 Beta2 and PoundRom (kitkat 4.4.2)

This is what happens:

- I started with Beta1 Regular (Apolo 7.0 r3p2 s3fb Beta1 Regular CWM) All is working great with the wonderful PhilZ recovery. 85% battery

- Flashed the new Beta 2 (Apolo 7.0 CM Beta2 Regular CWM). When phona starts, battery show a 1% level and theres no Battery page in Settings/device. Tried also with Light version.

- Flashed again Beta1. Battery is 81% again. Battery page returned. All working fine

There's only one version for mali3 drivers in this Beta2, right?

Do you have any hint?

Thanks in advance, and Feliz Navidad!

Btw, why the new Beta2 don't have Philz recovery?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pedestre:
The update tried to correct exactly this issue. Maybe some Roms don't have the latest changes in ramdisk , in this case you should use beta 1. It's difficult kitkat right now, because there are many changes in ramdisk and that affects a lot to kernel. I hope the Roms will be more stables in the future and these kind of thinks don't happen, but right now is what we have. That's why I keep these kernels in beta phase.

Only mali 3, yes

About recovery, philz recovery doesn't restore right among different android bases (bootloop in second reboot), so I decided to use stock recovery. Now I'm thinking of using TWRP recovery
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Karpfenhai:
Additionally, roms compiled after December 15. need beta 2, prior roms beta 1, check your build date before downloading!

Tapatalked from my Galaxy SII
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Christiaan91:
Can't get BLNWW or BLN to work.

Using kernel 7.0 OMNI beta 2 regular TWRP

Do you need a logcat?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pedestre:
Does the test work?

Use a kernel cleaner and wipe cache and dalvik and test
[Galaxy S II Android Development] :
You have just 34 pages to read, find it out.

[MENTION=3780512]bodomfan[/MENTION] with Dori and Siyah I had a big drain while on 3g, no matter what settings.

Speedmod, Hirox, Philz, Jeboo were good, but Apolo... For me it's the best, hat's down.

Sent from my S2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] cnjax:
I think this guy is just trolling the thread

GT-I9100 powered by

NeatRom Lite 4.7

Apollo 4.7 v1

JB Reloaded + MYLR blue theme
[Galaxy S II Android Development] bodomfan:
I agree with you :cool:

Sent from my Galaxy S2 Running Neatrom with Blueginger Theme
[Galaxy S II Android Development] lestervai:
why there's many ApolloJb 4.7 to choose from?

Extreme V0? V1? V2? Light? Regular?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] readon1:
Just for fun
[Galaxy S II Android Development] :
Dude, you are joking, right ?

And now you want what, that I explain to you what is already written in the first post. C'mon...

Sent from my S2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] lestervai:
thanks man! sorry this is my first time flashing a kernel. im confused so i asked.