yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[HTC Rezound] cjsteier:
I am having an issue that I have never experienced before on any rom. I cannot get the kernel setting to stick. I am using Kernel Tuner and they will set fine, but after say an hour or so the phone will lag like crazy. I will go into Kernel Tuner and the second core will be completely turned down and the first core will be about half way. As soon as a reset them where they were it works great again until the next time. I just flashed Snuzzo's 3.3.5 to see if it would remedy the situation, but it hasn't. The install of the original rom was from a clean wipe as usual. Any ideas what it may be? Thanks for any help.

Also forgot to mention the boot time is very long, longer than anything I have ran.
[HTC Rezound] lancasterv3:
I have never had any luck with kernel tuner, and I have really tried to get the settings to stick but they never have with any kernel. I know there has been talk in the forums about the settings not sticking in kernel tuner, but people have been having good luck with Trickster Mod. I have been using android overclock by jrummy and have had pretty good luck.The only down side with that is you cant control the cores independently but it all honesty I really don't mess with the cores, just set up screen on and screen off profiles. As far as the long boot time I am not sure unless you have a lot off apps starting upon boot.

I was also having pretty good results with ROM toolbox ---->CPU control as far as settings sticking.
[HTC Rezound] Hellraiser69:
ngemprot amiable

was wondering if you could tell me how to update to the latest firmware and radios

or give me a link how to do it thank you.
[HTC Rezound] lancasterv3:
are you s-off or on? if you're s-off you can flash the firmware and radios in hboot.

Sent from my Rezound using Xparent Red Tapatalk 2

---------- Post added at 10:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:21 PM ----------

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2250494

Global update is official.

if you are s-on this guide by brenuga post #59 is great plus the thread it self will give you plenty of directions and downloads for s-on and s-off directions. Dont hesitate to ask if you are unsure or confused during the process but that being said i would kindly have you direct any questions to the above thread so we dont clutter up this one too much. :)

Sent from my Rezound using Xparent Red Tapatalk 2
[HTC Rezound] Hellraiser69:
not sure what u mean by s-on or off if you mean super user i think it is on my phone is unlocked and rooted.
[HTC Rezound] brenuga:
You are most likely s-on. Click the link to that global thread Lancaster linked to. Download firmware.zip from post 35 and follow instructions in post 59.
[HTC Rezound] Hellraiser69:
i dont see that link can you post it for me plz thanks you
[HTC Rezound] brenuga:
Here you go. Look at posts 35 and 59. And read last couple of pages in thread bc I just helped someone learn more about how to update.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2250494
[HTC Rezound] lmt1979:
5-22 build

I "found" the 5-22 build, is there an issue with it? I'm flashing it now to check it out.
[HTC Rezound] Tidewater:
Thanks for the heads up. So how is it? Just downloaded it but should I bother if already on 5-20?
[HTC Rezound] TheBr0ken:
You should probably install the 5-23 build instead ;)
[HTC Rezound] jdmba:
5/23

Downloading ...wadja fix??!?!?
[HTC Rezound] TheBr0ken:
Going to be the last build for a few days, unless we find some major issues. We are bringing in support for multiple devices and will be implementing unified release dates. I'm going to be focusing on overall support and feature additions/updates for Xenon for now. Gotta keep up with the goodies ;)

Sent from my Samsumg Galaxy s3 infused with XenonHD on xda premium
[HTC Rezound] TheBr0ken:
Bunch of framework fixes as we add more devices and find more issues. Also went back to the stock kernel

Sent from my Samsumg Galaxy s3 infused with XenonHD on xda premium
[HTC Rezound] Xsoldier2000:
So I gave it a shot with the Screen @ 25% and that got me a couple extra hours (I also kind of babied it...) for a total of 5 1/2 hours more or less...switched back to the Pacman Rom and ran about 16 1/6 hours with my typical screen brightness.

Not saying there's anything wrong with the ROM, but this ROM just doesn't like MY particular phone. Will try again in a few releases.

This ROM is sweet, and thanks for bringing it to our phone.
[HTC Rezound] brenuga:
Is airplane mode toggle working, do u know?
[HTC Rezound] TheBr0ken:
Works, but same as before. Sadly I've come to the realization that its not ROM related, its something in my build environment. Looks like I'm formatting a PC over the weekend and starting fresh.

Though I haven't needed to use airplane mode for any reason. Guess you could go into *#*#4363#*#* menu and turn off the radios if you need to turn it off for whatever reason

Sent from my Samsumg Galaxy s3 infused with XenonHD on xda premium
[HTC Rezound] armstrongwannabe:
Hey Br0ken,

This version seems to run great so far thanks! Are you running it as well?
[HTC Rezound] TheBr0ken:
I am. Few bugs I'm still finding and will work on getting them resolved

Sent from my HTC Rezound infused with XenonHD on xda premium
[HTC Rezound] armstrongwannabe:
Dang, I spoke too soon. Headphones broke again. Reboot phone then Apollo couldn't find the music. I really think your on too something with this rom, it runs great just weird bugs keep popping up. Let me know if you need anybody to test builds cause I will be glad too!
[HTC Rezound] lmt1979:
WPA2 Wireless Tether

Anyone else tried using the built in wireless tethering with WPA2? I was unable to get it to connect with a windows 8 64 bit machine. Going to try out WPA (1) now just for s & g.

EDIT: WPA working fine retesting WPA2.

EDIT: Both working just fine now..sorry to post haha

MODS can delete.
[HTC Rezound] tholmes8291:
Is there a download mirror? Goo won't download
[HTC Rezound] cjsteier:
Headphones work fine for me. I don't use apollo so can't comment on it working. Clean flash right?
[HTC Rezound] jtio21:
Which gapps do I download?
[HTC Rezound] lancasterv3:
gapps-jb-20130301-signed

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Xparent Red Tapatalk 2
[HTC Rezound] jtio21:
Alright thank you I got them!!!
[HTC Rezound] jtio21:
One more question does WiFi tether app work on here because I still have unlimited data and can't use built in because of it.
[HTC Rezound] bkhorn:
Awesome battery life. I have had no reboots or glitches. I haven't used my phone as I would during the week so tomorrow should be interesting.
[HTC Rezound] TheBr0ken:
I have unlimited data and don't use anything but native tether
[HTC Rezound] jtio21:
Alright thankyou TheBroken really enjoyed the Rom just had to go back to my old one until I made sure I could tether without big red getting mad LOL. :D
[HTC Rezound] TheBr0ken:
No worries, like I said, I've been using native tether a long time without issue
[HTC Rezound] :
Has the rom been taken down? Unable to download it....
[HTC Rezound] TheBr0ken:
It has not, I'll look into it. I'll most likely put up a mirror
[HTC Rezound] :
Ok, thanks. The 5/23 is culprit. Bern trying to dl since last night.

Update: it finally started to DL after 14min of waiting. The dl speed is awful though.
[HTC Rezound] Tha Maxx:
Try to use the goo.im app
[HTC Rezound] :
I used goo, stock browser, chrome, opera, tried all with 4g and wifi. No difference.
[HTC Rezound] Tha Maxx:
Please just bare with it. Even the biggest sites have trouble.
[HTC Rezound] bkhorn:
DELETED
[HTC Rezound] Tha Maxx:
Please take down the mirror
[HTC Rezound] Tha Maxx:
mms fix for those with issues

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=41932974&postcount=5905
[HTC Rezound] pogibry:
Does anybody have this that they can put in their dropbox and provide a download link? I'd be much appreciated :D
[HTC Rezound] :
Took almost 3.5 hrs and timed out twice, but i got it.....

Nice rom, liking smooth and so far no issues.

* will this rom work with snuzzo or hiro kernerls?
[HTC Rezound] pogibry:
Would you be able to throw that in your dropbox and shoot a link? :fingers-crossed:
[HTC Rezound] cjsteier:
Yes, it will work with both of those, Broken just went back to the stock kernel to try and work out and eliminate possible issues. The 5/20 build was actually released with Snuzzo's Kernel.
[HTC Rezound] champdr0id:
With hiro, the only issue I'm having is with kernel tuner shooting my core max freq. down to 386. Got it fixed with CPU master though. I heard mention of newer versions of kernel tuner causing issues.

Sent from my Rezound using Xparent BlueTapatalk 2
[HTC Rezound] TheBr0ken:
I haven't had anything on my phone long enough to test, but I have heard of many issues with Kernel Tuner. Trickster mod is supposed to be good, but again, I haven't tested.
[HTC Rezound] pmania:
I've been trying to download this for a few days and it keeps failing. Any chance of a mirror/something besides goo?
[HTC Rezound] gleggie:
Thanks for this, flashing right now.. this is a PMEN build correct?

Edit: holy snap this thing is smooth
[HTC Rezound] live2die:
yes
[HTC Rezound] netookska05:
Im on the 5/23 build and Apollo keeps force closing. Anyone else experiencing this or know of a fix?
[HTC Rezound] TheBr0ken:
New build is up, lots of changes and lots of goodies added!
[HTC Rezound] jdmba:
THANKS!!! Is there a change-log summary; the Xenon site is basically line item code fixes (such as "split extract script into extracter, makefile writer") and the person who did it :) Would love to know what actually changed, if possible.

Just 2 more hours and the goo-based download will be MINE!
[HTC Rezound] TheBr0ken:
Its a lengthy list of changes. Since the Rez was one of the first non-Nexus devices running this, we had to make many framework changes to accommodate a wider range of products. Doing so has made it work a bit smoother on our device, even from the last build. Pulled in a few CM and AOKP files while trying to keep this as close to ASOP as possible.
[HTC Rezound] OddFutur3:
Although I'm certain I know the answer to this question already: is it safe to dirty flash over the 5-23 build?

Sent from Ceti Alpha V
[HTC Rezound] TheBr0ken:
Not with what has changed
[HTC Rezound] OddFutur3:
Got it, thanks!

Sent from Ceti Alpha V
[HTC Rezound] jtio21:
New version running super smooth. And native WiFi works nice also.
[HTC Rezound] Xsoldier2000:
Holy Crap, this new build is awesome. Flashed this last night and it is super smooth and awesome on battery life....I'm a believer now.

Time to open up the wallet, and show thanks...

EDIT: Just had a hot-reboot of sorts at the lock screen and System UI crashes a lot.
[HTC Rezound] trud9340:
Video recording isn't working for me (video is all scrambled) - am I alone here?

Also, I don't see an option to enable quick-reply and screen wake for text messaging.
[HTC Rezound] Xsoldier2000:
Recording working for me. But I had that issue on the 5/23 build also. 5/29 is tight.
[HTC Rezound] TheBr0ken:
Video recording works fine here as well
[HTC Rezound] winston856:
Everything good on 5/29 so far, would also like a simplified change log please :)
[HTC Rezound] trud9340:
Any suggestions to fix my recording issue? I wiped twice before flashing, I have no idea what would be causing the issue.
[HTC Rezound] lepa71:
Some battery stats would be nice.
[HTC Rezound] winston856:
Spoke too soon, I'm having issues with the camera/gallery and google+ FCing. When I take a photo the gallery says it stopped working then google+ does the same. I don't have any picture sync setup or anything. Very strange, coming from a fresh wipe/install.

Anyone else having those issues? I uninstalled G+ and it's still doing it, even after a reboot. Now the gallery is saying 0 photos/videos available, they are still on the SD card...

Fixed, wiped cache/dalvik and I'm back in business. :)
[HTC Rezound] trud9340:
I downloaded a different camera/video app (CameraMX) and it is recording video just fine. :confused:

Edit: And now the stock camera is working...I have no idea, I guess I'll shut my mouth until it breaks again. Anyways, besides these intermittent camera issues, the ROM is really fast and smooth - noticeably faster than the previous version!
[HTC Rezound] Xsoldier2000:
Ok, on the 5/23 build (stock), I lasted 5.5hrs..., but on the 5/29 build (stock) you can see after 5+hours...it's a HUGE difference. I didn't change usage at all.
[Java for Android App Development] Quinny899:
If you have root, use a system wide thing, don't support an app that incorporates piracy methods

And "why are you on a forum which allows freedom"

Read the goddamn rules, we don't allow that kind of stuff, it's warez and illegal

Also, I don't think you understand what I'm doing by uninstalling it here. I'm protecting my rights, not 'uninstalling a competitor' as you compare it to.

Meanwhile, I'm about to have a mod clean out this thread, including this post
[Java for Android App Development] superkoal:
How the hell did you guys get into developers forum?

Removing ads is the same way illegal than pirating an entire app.

I specifically set prices very low in countries with less developed economy. I would even offer my app for free in some countries if google would let me.
[Java for Android App Development] SifJar:
I don't think it's a terrible idea (unlike a lot of people here, looks like we have a lot of pirates about...*), but I do think there are better ways to go about it, as mentioned in this post http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=41581990&postcount=9

Checking the hash of the app sounds like a pretty simple but reasonably decent method for checking that the app hasn't been patched by some tool like Lucky Patcher. Not sure if there's any way to check the signature on an app to ensure it's been signed with your own keys, but if so that would probably be another good thing to check (seeing as modifications would require re-signing with a different key).

*To people who claim they use it for other purposes; the uses I know for LP are piracy, blocking ads and removing permissions. Blocking ads is pretty much the same as piracy in my mind (devs put the ads there to make money instead of charging for the app, blocking them takes away that revenue), and removing permissions seems to be kinda crappy with LP (force closes etc.). There are much better solutions for both.
[Java for Android App Development] Quinny899:
There's ways of checking if it uses the debug key, which I believe Lucky Patcher signs with, see here:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5578871/android-how-to-get-app-signature
[Java for Android App Development] m11kkaa:
If your app is a game and it's completely native(unity3d, cocos2dx,...) you could do the following:

1) do license checks from within native code(.so file)

2) check signature of apk file from within native code and kill app if it's not valid

3) sign your native libraries and do self checks before execution to prevent people from editing asm code.
[Java for Android App Development] LiquidSolstice:
Wow, some of you guys...

God forbid a developer expect that you compensate him/her for hard work on an application.

If it's worth it for you to go through the trouble of getting outside of the Play Store, cracking it, and sideloading it, clearly it's worth it to you enough to actually pay for it.

As usual with so many Android users, the self-entitlement complex is through the goddamn roof. I get it, being on a forum where you get such amazing aftermarket firmwares and modifications at no cost to you has really gone to your head; it makes you believe that all things Android should be cheap and free but that's really not how it works.

I don't buy the "I use Lucky Patcher to block ads" BS. If you want to block ads, there's a million different ways you can use a hosts file or an app that manages the host file to do that (especially if you're concerned with traffic, that's the ideal solution).

I get the criticism with the idea of removing another app, but I don't buy for even one second that anyone thinks they are justified in pirating the app; this is the mentality that spreads and becomes a huge problem. Many of you just don't see anything wrong in circumventing a payment/compensation system, citing all sorts of reasons that range from potentially/weakly relevant to stupidly shameless.

3 years ago when I first got my HTC Hero, I pirated an app called Slide Screen because it looked really cool but I didn't want to pay for it. On the forum where I got the apk, there was a post from the developer of the app pleading with people to consider actually buying the app because he had put in a ton of effort in to it and was just trying to earn back a little extra income from all his research and self-taught Java lessons.

After that, I completely stopped using pirated apps because I understood; the Play Store is a vicious cesspool that is FULL to the brim of absolute utter crap, especially the "My First Android App"-type applications. It's very hard to gain exposure and with reverse engineering, it's even harder to maintain a unique app because of how easy it is to just turn around and modify someone else's apk and then resell it. It doesn't help that (and this only seems to happen with Android users) Android users are incredibly ignorant of the platform and downrate an *free* app for not having an extravagantly complex addition as though they are entitled to it.

Many of you spend between $300 and $600 on these devices, and many of you pay $50+ a month for a plan to go with them. Is it really so much for you to consider to spend what many call "a cheap fastfood lunch" on an app that you enjoy using, find useful, and get lifetime updates for?

Sadly, XDA users of today are completely unaware of what the "free" in "Freedom of linux" means. Gratis != libre. The freedom that linux brings to the masses is not as in free beer but free speech.

You all need to check your self-entitlement complex, it's clearly outgrown your sense of morality and logic.
[Java for Android App Development] LiquidSolstice:
That applies to other apps that are installed from the Play Store. Last I checked, Lucky Patcher isn't from the Play Store.
[Java for Android App Development] zelendel:
Ok guys CALM down. Now I know this is a heated subject it is plain and simple. If you cant buy the app then dont. It doesnt matter what the reason is, Developers have the right to protect themselves and their apps. While I agree it will never be stopped why not make it a huge PITA for it to be cracked?

I agree with the OP. More Developers should add things like this and the LP remover is a great idea. If you dont like it then too bad. Feel free not to use it.

Now Get this thread back on topic and that is idea to help protect their apps.
[Java for Android App Development] Vinchenzop:
The issue that I have with your 3rd world possibility, is that there are many apps made for free by volunteers to assist in the aid of the less fortunate memebers of deprived communities/countries. These unforunate people aren't in a position to have internet access, so these second-hand devices are given, pre-loaded with educational software. They don't have access to the PlayStore, or any other site that would even give them the possibility of piracy.

While the message behind your post may pull on the heart-strings of others, it is a flawed story that is full of holes. While life isn't about money, someone expecting to receive out, what they put in, isn't an outlandish standard.

Sorry, I was typing when you posted. Back on topic...protect your apps the best you can, but expect someone to make it free, because that's life.
[Java for Android App Development] Magissia:
Checking app's integrity can make two in one, check if it got corrupted in anyway, check if it was patched.

A popup can then, in case of failled check, tell that app is corrupted because it failled integrity check (even if it was not corrupted and just patched, integrity point of view, it's corrupted)

This check should happen at startup and a second time somewhere else to make it look "random", this way it will be more annoying for the cracker to disable this integrity check.

Please keep in mind you'll have to redo checks on your side for each updates.

Another solution may be to require direct account auth, and have a backend server to check if user's account correspond a buyer's mail. This method should not be used with an app not supposed to use internet (because it will be really annoying for the user if trying to use it without a data plan)

Please note i don't know if you get all users mails or only when they refund, may not be applicable, just an idea.

Hope it helps anyone.

Regards
[Java for Android App Development] Tolriq:
Moderation was made with a chainsaw :)

About anti piracy techniques, one of the most effective thing as stated before in this thread is not to kill the app at start and put big messages.

Those are easy to spot and remove.

95% of the hackers that will allow mass distribution of your app won't be users of your app, they just fill requests for the fame.

So adding random checks at places that only real users will trigger is the easy way to go.

You can still let some honeypot easy to track for those, so they think they have cracked the app.

Currently my app is tell to be cracked and spread a lot to internet at each of my release.

But the app is not really cracked it does all the free version support, leading to more installs of a functional app leading users to love your app and then buy it if they can, others would in fact never buy an app so are not good users.

This also brings a lots of publicity, since each time the "hackers" post your app there's a full description with links to PlayStore and your website if you have one.

Piracy is not bad it's free ads :)

Simple checks on crc and signature are obvious to defeat, don't use them as a boolean test but use those values to calculate other one that are useful elsewhere (Easier to do with signature that don't change, crc needs implementing a custom ant build and tools :) )
[Java for Android App Development] coolbud012:
Just my own opinion guys, dont you think the user would delete our app instead of removing lucky patcher or freedom?

Also what if he has replaced his market/play store with the cracked version one?
[Java for Android App Development] Quinny899:
I believe Google now protect from the cracked play store on its servers, and if they do, that's their choice. You'd make no money either way
[Java for Android App Development] coolbud012:
Cracked Play Store is still working...Beside play store what about the other things which I mentioned.
[Java for Android App Development] S.D.Richards:
I believe a pirating user will more likely delete a not working app and look for an alternative then remove LP. Reason is simple, there are usually more app alternatives than to LP. In theory, this behaviour could be a bad thing, if he's one of the try-before-buy people and ends up buying an alternative from another dev.

As far as random checks based on user input or after some time goes, at least for the former there are automated solutions which hit every button, enter all kinds of data in fields, etc. Basically fuzzy vulnerability search tweaked for user input. So if you want to use that, you've got to think long and hard to not scare of legitamte customers.

Self checks are hard to implement in a strong and resistent way, plus your rating can go from 5 to 1 if you ever forget to do it, so you better make sure to add it to your buildsystem.
[Java for Android App Development] Tolriq:
If an hacker have time to build an automated test solution for the app to validate that every action result in the correct result then :

- This is the best hacker in the world so nothing will stop him :)

- He does much more than even me can do on my apps and I'd gladly ask for his test solution :)

And Yatse is still 5 stars so when things are correctly done hackers makes ads for you and users are happy and buy your app :)