yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] zalooa:
Interesting Problem

Hello again,

I want to say thanks for this guide again for such an elegant method to the quick unlock.

I am trying to execute this type of code for android 4.3,

The problem is there is no PasswordUnlockScreen.smali anywhere.

I have decompiled some other ones that might have it but unfortunately I am sadly lost :(

I was wondering if there was any way to start in the right direction to get this going for Android 4.3, I guess it seems easy when you are trying to apply a mod that has the same files at least and the mystery unfolds that way, but when the file is missing altogether or even worse called something else, I am clueless, how would you search for something like this to begin with, I do not want to bug you but any help you can offer that can get me hunting in the right direction can allow me to research the area more.

Thanks again for everything even if you do not want to help, you got me going through all my roms and just decompiling and messing with the code so it helps to know we got a tutorial for almost everything here.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] CNexus:
I would suggest looking for S4 tutorials that show how to create this mod on 4.2.2 and 4.3, as those will be the most similar to our MK3 code
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] zalooa:
That is a good place to get started. THANKS!
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Unknownforce:
I didn't know such tutorials existed? If there is I'd like to see them myself! I messed around trying to get this working a long time ago and kinda gave up cause they completely changed the way the lock screen functions code-wise... :/
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] sbreen94:
I haven't seen anything :/
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] jacknicholson:
Not sure if they'd work on TouchWiz, but there a couple quick pin unlock Xposed modules floating around for 4.2+ (or at least feature it, like GravityBox).

Regarding Xposed, though -- would anyone care to whip this up into a module, perhaps with AOSP compatibility? (Hopefully not derailing the thread too much here.)
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] zalooa:
Good to know

I havent even begun to look, I am aware of an Xposed framework that can do it but it has consquences if you change your pin in one location and not the other.

I prefer this native method.

The whole code has been bamboozled. This is going to be a mission. For now, I will have to keep researching and decompiling android.policy.jar and others to find the truth

- Mulder and Scully
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] loserskater:
If you can get the setting done, then decompile a CM android.policy and compare these two files with your files.

/smali/com/android/internal/policy/impl/keyguard/KeyguardAbsKeyInputView.smali
/smali/com/android/internal/policy/impl/keyguard/KeyguardAbsKeyInputView$2.smali

I may or may not update this guide for 4.3.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] sbreen94:
Do it! :) :) :) would be awesome
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Unknownforce:
Ew, Xposed... Have no desire to use this to mess with framework stuff, native mods work far more reliably.

The setting is easy. You're saying that it lives in KeyguardAbsKeyInputView now, I was looking in the Password/PIN "View" files before, I'll see what I can figure out.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] CNexus:
Would be great if you can. Especially since smali is the devil for most of us
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Unknownforce:
I don't mind it, it's obviously not as clean as C++ but I can follow it fairly well for the most part.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Unknownforce:
[MENTION=1016795]loserskater[/MENTION] This is what I've come up with, but I'm just getting bootloops if I have PIN or Password Lock screens enabled.

http://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=23252070760975405

I included the original files, the modded files and CM's files as well.

Edit: By the way, it boot loops regardless of the Quick Unlock Setting. The functionality of the checkbox itself works just fine and all the xml references are in place, ID's are in place, etc. What I mean is SecSettings mod is fine, if I have an unmodded android.policy.jar in place with the modded SecSettings, there are no issues. The option obviously does nothing, but it's there and toggles properly.

Also, if I'm on another lock screen option other than pin or password before flashing the mod, then apply the mod. The system works just fine, but then setting a pin or password lock screen causes the phone to not come back on after the screen turns off, then bootloops cause it's always locked of course.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] loserskater:
Updated android.policy for 4.3. Didn't update the settings though. Although it shouldn't be too much different...

[MENTION=1354510]Unknownforce[/MENTION] I looked at your files and it looks good to me... You should be able to get a logcat even though it's not fully booted. If you could post that I can try and see what's causing the issue.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] sbreen94:
Thanks loserskater
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] loserskater:
Modified the 4.3 how-to. You need to increase the locals in onFinishInflate().

[MENTION=1354510]Unknownforce[/MENTION]: try increasing yours to 5.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Unknownforce:
I tried using v2 instead but still did the same thing, not sure, but for some reason it's not able to read the setting from SecSettings. So I just said screw it, removed it from the Settings and just added it as an option to select during the install of my ROMs with AROMA. If you want to change it, you just re-flash the ROM right on top of itself. I made one of the first selection "Change Mods" which doesn't do a full wipe and just changes files based on the selections that are made. Not as quick as a setting in the menus, but it works none-the-less, and it's fairly easy to do. Besides, I figure most people that use it are just going to have it on all the time anyways, so they don't really need the option available anyways ;)
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Many40:
Hi [MENTION=1016795]loserskater[/MENTION],

I've just implemented your mod into s2 (i9100) / JB 4.1.2 XWMS2 - works great. However I'm wondering if there is also a doable way to make a similar mod for SIM PIN unlock screen (during booting OS). If you could give a proper direction / hint to that it would be appreciated.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] tdunham:
[MENTION=1016795]loserskater[/MENTION]

Trying to adapt this to a newer build than 4.3. If you happen to have any newly modified KeyguardAbsKeyInputView$2.smali for me to try that would be awesome. Just asking. ;)
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] tdunham:
[MENTION=1016795]loserskater[/MENTION]

Ok, disregard previous. I always seem to come to a resolution shortly after I ask for help. :rolleyes:

I will post some additional info regarding modding 4.4.2 but the modifications are now located in keyguard.apk so I have to post my information with that in mind since android.policy.jar no longer contains the smali code necessary for this modification on our build.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] CNexus:
[MENTION=1042140]tdunham[/MENTION]

I hope that you'll be adding the above to your mega thread ;):D:thumbup:

Nice work :thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] tdunham:
Just added it. Thanks.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] sbreen94:
Thanks man!
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] nambavuong:
hello, can I ask u guide for android 5.0 pls :D I juz want to mod it for android 5.0 Lollipop :D thank you sir!
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] schnidex:
I have an even stranger request.. I'd like to mod it for 4.4.4 on a Sony Xperia Z3 Compact!

Is this possible? I don't pretend to be a coder but I'm determined to get this on my phone - somehow..

:fingers-crossed:
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] tdunham:
[GUIDE][HOW TO] Quick PIN Unlock And Scramble Pad For Lollipop

Credits [MENTION=3512588]txr33[/MENTION]
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] tdunham:
[MENTION=1016795]loserskater[/MENTION]

Please post to the OP.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] loserskater:
Thanks. Updated OP
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] husainbeg786786:
Hello Bro, i have samsung galaxy s5 (sm-g900i) android 5.0 lollipop

i am new here

i want this mod on my s5

but i can't get what to do.. :eek::eek:

can i get a flashable zip for this mod?? pleaseeeeeee:(:(

thanks :good:
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] tdunham:
No, it is not possible due to the system files involved in making this work.

You would have to find someone capable enough to do this for your exact phone and android build. We cannot do this for you.

And it would really help if it was someone with the sm-g900i so it can be tested and troubleshot since this is a pretty involved modification.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Rahulmsinghvi:
Can you create one for marshmallow?
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] krikz:
Can we do this on marshmallow? I'm running [MENTION=5699300]sulthan[/MENTION]xda unofficial CM13 on my Oneplus One. I tried using gravity box for this feature,but its buggy. Everything goes wrong when i enable gravity box in Xposed. Please help
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] tdunham:
This modification is for touchwiz. I don't know if it can be adapted to cm.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] krikz:
Okay..
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] KR_:
Does this work in Marshmallow?

Samsung A3 2016
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Eklondh:
Is there anything like this for newer systems? Like Nougat and Pie?
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 General] dinoignacio:
I installed V2r's Skin2Choose and then uninstalled it soon after.

Now everytime I turn on my xdaii I get an error message saying "Cannot execute \Windows\V2r\Skin2Choose 3.5\onCHange.exe"

it's very annoying.

does anyone know how i can remove this.

thanks.

Dino
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 General] Rudegar:
windows\startup

and remove the program that cause that
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 General] dinoignacio:
nope i trieed that. it's not there.

i did find a program that cleared it out of the notifications list.

http://www.scarybearsoftware.com/ppc_cn_overview.html

problem solved

whew,
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] marcochapita:
Hey Guys, i just wanna share this case,because many people has talked about the case but i dont know if anyone got one.i Have one of this, and one Neo Hybrid.

Definitly this one gives more protection but makes the phone a little bigger as well.

on everyday use, i use the Neo Hybrid,but when i know im going to a place like a club or something i know i have the possibility that my S4 drops on the floor i put the SlimArmor.
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] MMakoto:
Oh wow, that indent is so deep on the camera lens and flash, it seems like trouble on the long run with dust trapped inside.
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] whytechapel_x:
Lol looks like it came in the wrong box. How do you guys think this red one looks with the white S4?
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] x4sper:
nice that lip looks good. the other slim armor thread turned into a slim armor bashing thread but this looks good. did you receive this in the neo hybrid packaging? if so it's fake
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] wannabeswede:
Did you just push yours into your case with the TPU and the shell already mated?

My phone doesn't stay in well and there is more of the Silver bezel showing than what I see in your pictures.

Even with just the TPU case by itself the bezel is showing
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] galaxy1026:
i ordered one from amazon and i didnt notice that it will dispacth after 3 weeks time. i try to cancel but to late. hope it will arrive original one and not in the neo hybrid case which i believe its fake :)))

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] inphamous36:
Are you sure you can't cancel it? Amazon doesn't charge you until it ships. ..
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] marcochapita:
in my opinion youre phone cuz its white maybe it looks better with blue color.the red i think its not going to look so good.
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] marcochapita:
no i didnt receive it in this package, i put it there so i could show you that even the original ones fits on that package as well,because so many people get theres on that kind of package.so it makes no diference fake or original, mine broght the serial number to confirm its autentic, and a label inside the case itself to proof that was the real thing :laugh: but how can you tell if its fake or not without the numbers?i like to know those kind of things.
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] marcochapita:
yes i saw in a review on youtube its better to put the phone in to the case when they already mated its easy and i can confirm that,the other way around i take more time to put it through.

im going to put some more pictures today just you to see more detail of the cover. but i guess was you didnt put the phone on the cover that is already mated that can be youre problem.mine i think is doing the job is suposed to do.very protective and still not so big,but a little bigger than the neo hybrid that is the case im loving right now.
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] flipq88:
Did you buy it from Spigen themselves? Or from ebay and it came from hong kong?

That's os easy to find out

Sent from Flip's Galaxy S4
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] marcochapita:
I bought from spigen but not from ebay. From amazon.uk ;)

Sent from my GT-I9505
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] x4sper:
No serial number? Mine has numbers.

-- Sent from my Palm Pre using Forums
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] ErebusRaze:
I got this case on black last night for my black S4. Coming from Otterbox this case will not protect against decent drops as its far too thin. Its nice for low maybe 3 foot drops. My only grip is that the gloss hard Cover shows finger prints heavily. Extremely heavily. And, it's hard to wipe off even with a cloth or shirt, etc. Nice designed case though. More for looks than protection.
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] phazes:
Awesome case. Out of all the ones I have used, this one so far is definitely my favorite.
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] marcochapita:
my brough numbers its autentic ;) i said before.
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] marcochapita:
i think it can protect fare enough because its made of tpu material and on top of that plastic. i had on my S3 only a skin case that doesnt protect at all,it only spare me at the riscs on the camera when i put it on top of a table.so for me this one protects really well because im not planed to get my s4 fall of my hand at a great distance.its only an extra protection if im unlucky at some point. because as i told before i only use this case when i go to a club at night or to a place that is full of people. on every day use i use the Neo Hybrid that i prefered. i really like more neo Hybrid and that one protects even less :p but my only concern is when i put on top of a table or something to not make scratches on the back camera lens :cool:
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] AVTR1337:
sorry but this slim armor is fake

i ordered mine directly from spigen SPG in california und it looks different.
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] marcochapita:
but they send me the number, :eek: and i bought from spigen uk on amazon :( either way protects so its better then my slim cover that i used on S3 that cost me only 3£ :p so if its fake its fake,thanks anyway for let me know.
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] j3poysy:
looks nice.
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] Sp1tfire:
His case covers too much of the phone's screen, mine shows the silver bezel. I inserted the serial number found on the sticker on original.spigen.com and it's a genuine product, so I assume his is a fake. Looks pretty similar to the original though, except for the power button's shape and the large lip that covers the screen.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] JoJo2211:
I always buy my phones from eBay and last year when the S3 came out the price of brand new S3 locked to AT&T was around $535-550. But this year the S4 prices have incredibly held up very well... well over $600. I can't remember the last time a branded Galaxy S line commanded such price.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] freemeech:
Bought mine for 700$ shipped on release day off EBay...best purchase I've made this year!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] j510:
On contract doesnt make a difference for me. Bought mine for $81
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] TBayTom:
I think the GS4 is selling for a higher price off contract compared to what the GS3 costed when it was released. I don't remember the GS3 costing $650 at launch. I bought my GS3 for $475 brand new off ebay a month after launch.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Orion575:
I got mine S4(AT&T) two days ago from Craigslist for $550, sealed in a box, couldn't be happier :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] barondebxl:
Wow you lucky guy!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Nitroglycerin:
I paid exactly 0.00$ for my S4. Technically I was given 8$ to buy it.

I traded in my wife's iPhone 4S. Best buy gave me 220$ for it and the S4 on contract was 212$. So I gave my iPhone 5 to my wife, and walked out of Best Buy with a brand new Galaxy S4 and an 8$ gift card lol

Couldn't be happier and I LOOOOVE the S4!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] eak1080:
Did about the same thing, ditched my HTC One X at Best Buy and paid $87 for the S4 and a case on launch day. Thing has been a beast ever since.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] aygriffith:
That screams of a future IMEI lock. I'm happy to sell on CL but I've been burned lately with working phones that suddenly come up IMEI locked 2 months later for issues AT&T or T-Mobile can't seem to tell me about.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] iB4STiD:
if only the price held up as well as the iPhone, Just sold my iPhone 5 for 475, not as much as I thought, but then again bought my 5 in sep
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] cinnabar:
wow... that's way better than AT&T's trade in program. Was is a 32/64 GB?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Nitroglycerin:
No, I traded in a 16GB, but Best Buy's trade in program has always been great. Newer phones tend to be under what you could potentially get selling it (they wanted to give me 350$ for my factory unlocked and jailbroken i5 when I could sell it for 500$ on eBay) but other phones were definitely higher, like the 4S.

I always try Best Buy first because they usually give the most.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] hfxzack:
Worth every dollar IMO
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Orion575:
May be, but I'm not using my S4 with the AT&T, I'm using it on Straight Talk pre-paid
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Firedcylinder:
They can still lock it. It's a nationwide database that all the carriers use.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] aygriffith:
Doesn't matter, if it's locked on AT&T or T-Mo it's locked on any prepaid carrier using the same network.

Just a FYI.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Orion575:
Well it works fine so far and hopefully they are not gonna lock it in a future !
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Firedcylinder:
Yeah I hope they don't either.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S 4 General] Orion575:
May be I had to keep an HTC One instead of getting an S4:)
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] djmax81:
Back to stock rom with root....I got no clue why developer never mention lill bugs like switched of charging animation bug , camera Gallery broken + spen not wifi tethering etc. working at this stage ...

But a tip for users who flash CM or AOKP build .that it still Beta version no clue why Devs do not make it clear for Users on post...that its beta version for note 2 yut...and Note 2 is such a awesome hardware till now that it only worth with stock rom ..support only..like multi window n Spen features rich ...cheers ....fellow Galaxy note 2 users .....No offense to any person just not worth it at all.
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] BenRoark:
Fixed.
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] djmax81:
Charging off animation ....still presents and wifi ...

Which rom u talking abt I tried all latest update.
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] BenRoark:
My first post was kinda in response to sweeping statements and value judgements made by you about the work of AOSP/AOKP Devs, but anyway...

I've tried pretty much all the AOSP/AOKP ROMs that are currently published on XDA, and the following presented absolutely no issues for me whatsoever in my usage of them:

- SentinelROM

- LiquidSmooth

- RootBox (unofficial)

- Slim Bean

I certainly didn't have any issues with WiFi but, I have to say, I don't give a flying $%#* what my screen-off charging animation looks like, so I never paid attention to it (and, therefore, can't comment on it).
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] djmax81:
@ Mr BenRoark

I give No Rats Ass Either .that how and what your Usage is or was .. but wanted make it clear .....and click point Stock is Stock is an Stock is the best as per my scale .... else like its less gay .so wanted to share ...with other Users .though i'm also into Development for Android on other devises ... and do not think CM or whatever rom it worth a even try ....at this stage ...if u wanna kill your phone then go ahead .i'm happy with Sammy's rom...

Cheers :good::good:
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] bushako:
I find almost everything satisfiable with aosp such as Slimbean or CM such as Sentinel except for the battery performances. I get almost half the battery life compared to stock based and that about it. However, everything you've mentioned in OP is irrelevant as most of them have been fixed and a few such as battery logo when charging is not important.
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] D3_:
Seeing as you're basically copy and pasting your posts from the Rootbox thread into this one, I'll do the ssme:

He's hardly trolling. Do you even know the meaning of the word? It doesn't mean disagreeing.

Why would you expect a rom which has nighties being released to be perfectly stable with every single feature working? Nightly is pretty much synonymous for beta when it comes to ROMs imo.

Also, you have to realise that not everyone's needs are similar to yours. I personally never used multiwindow and rarely even use the S-pen, even though it technically works just as well on ROMs like this (and for my purpose of note taking it actually works better seeing as I can now use the S-pen button as an eraser rather than taking a screenshot)

Also the fact that this is on 4.2.2 and I can use lockscreen widgets is a huge plus over stock for me, dashclock is immensely useful.

Although some parts of it are out of context (see the rootbox thread to read it in context) my points still stand.
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Primokorn:
In 4.2.2 ROMs we have new features and we lost a few ones. A choice must be done between custom stock based ROMs and AOSP based ROMs.

I often see some claims because S-Pen doesn't work, MultiWindow, AirView... You have to understand what you flash!

Since I tried AOSP I never came back to Stock based ROMs. Atm I have Rootbox rom by Bajee and everything is working fine with one nightly per week.

Concerning charging animation bug, I remember that flashing a custom kernel solved this issue (Redpill kernel I think but the battery life is not very good except of Hyperdroid).

Of course we have bugs on AOSP Roms but don't forget that Samsung FWs also have big issues! SDS & Exynos exploit have been patched a long time after the discovery, Aroma Installer crashes on some Custom ROMs,...

Samsung official products aren't always good too. Just have a look at Samsung Kies which generates a lot of damages!
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] FloatingFatMan:
Why would anyone with more than half a brain expect Samsung specific features like multiwindow or the S-Pen, to work on CM or AOKP? Do you even know what CM or AOKP roms ARE?