yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Nexus 10 General] hessan:
Still, the rendering of the bigger number of pixels uses more power. Not sure about percentages though. This is specially important when running 3D games or other graphics-intensive apps. But I still credit your point about the back-light being a great deal of it.
[Nexus 10 General] PoisonWolf:
If that's the case, the iPhone 4 and iPhone 4S should have gotten worse battery life than their Android counterparts back in the day. Did that happen? No. The energy footprint on ARM devices are so minute that the backlighting still takes the trophy in terms of energy footprint.
[Nexus 10 General] xboxfanj:
Apple only has a small set of fairly similar devices to support. All have the same series of GPU, similar hardware, and iOS is a less resource intensive OS. There are too many differing factors to fairly compare battery on two devices on the two OS's.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] quywz:
1.use kitchen extract rom from N7000ZSLO2_N7000OZSLO2_N7000XXLSO_HOME.tar.md5, then deodex rom.

2.copy android.policy.jar to sdcard.(android.policy.jar is unmodified.)

3.use dexopt-wrapper reodex ,get android.policy.odex.

4.copy android.policy.odex to /system/framework/android.policy.odex and set 644 permissions

5.reboot device and stay at samsung logo frame

now,How to deal with this problem? help,thx.

process

adb shell
su

busybox cp -f /data/local/tmp/odex/dexopt-wrapper /system/bin/dexopt-wrapper
chmod 755 /system/bin/dexopt-wrapper

busybox cp -f /system/framework/android.policy.jar /system/framework/android.policy.jar.bak
busybox cp -f /system/framework/android.policy.odex /system/framework/android.policy.odex.bak

rm /system/framework/android.policy.odex
busybox cp -f /data/local/tmp/odex/android.policy.jar /system/framework/android.policy.jar
dexopt-wrapper /system/framework/android.policy.jar /system/framework/android.policy.odex
busybox dd if=/system/framework/android.policy.odex.bak of= /system/framework/android.policy.odex bs=1 count=20 skip=52 seek=52 conv=notrunc

rm /system/framework/android.policy.jar
busybox cp -f /system/framework/android.policy.jar.bak /system/framework/android.policy.jar

rm /system/framework/android.policy.jar.bak
rm /system/framework/android.policy.odex.bak

chmod 644 /system/framework/android.policy.odex
reboot

attach file is logcat information.The log file alway display "DexOpt: Some deps went away"
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ThaiDai:
What Rom are you using?

But more important: Why do you want to do this?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] nokiamodeln91:
If you using a deodexed rom, you don't need an odexed jar
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] quywz:
offical rom:N7000ZSLO2_N7000OZSLO2_N7000XXLSO_HOME.tar

i want to add a recovery menu item.

now after update file,device status:

framework-res.apk OK

android.policy.jar fail
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] quywz:
in framework folder,all is odex.so if i want to modify a jar, must need an odex file.i want to update file as little as possible.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] quywz:
update.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Einril:
Is there a reason you're copying the .odex signature to /data/local/tmp/odex/android.policy.odex instead of /system/framework/android.policy.odex ? With your script, /system/framework/android.policy.odex remains unsigned.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] quywz:
sorry,In this thread,I write wrong.

The actual operation is "busybox dd if=/system/framework/android.policy.odex.bak of= /system/framework/android.policy.odex bs=1 count=20 skip=52 seek=52 conv=notrunc".but the result is same.

if=/system/framework/android.policy.odex.bak is input file.

of = /system/framework/android.policy.odex is output file.

copy .odex signature from /system/framework/android.policy.odex.bak to /system/framework/android.policy.odex.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Einril:
So what you're doing is :

1. optimize /system/framework/android.policy.jar to create /system/framework/android.policy.odex

2. copy the signature from /system/framework/android.policy.odex.bak to /data/local/tmp/odex/android.policy.odex

3. copy /data/local/tmp/odex/android.policy.odex to /system/framework/android.policy.odex

Am I right ? If I am, you're deleting the .odex file created from android.policy.jar, and replacing it with another one.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] quywz:
sorry,In this thread,I write wrong.

The actual operation is "busybox dd if=/system/framework/android.policy.odex.bak of= /system/framework/android.policy.odex bs=1 count=20 skip=52 seek=52 conv=notrunc".but the result is same.

if=/system/framework/android.policy.odex.bak is input file.

of = /system/framework/android.policy.odex is output file.

copy .odex signature from /system/framework/android.policy.odex.bak to /system/framework/android.policy.odex.

1.right

2.copy .odex signature from /system/framework/android.policy.odex.bak to /system/framework/android.policy.odex.above is my copy wrong.

3.used new signed /system/framework/android.policy.odex.

4.reboot,device stay at logo frame
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] quywz:
edit.invalid context
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Einril:
Is the attached script the entire script ?

If it is, why are you only copying the .odex files from /data/local/tmp/odex/ to /system/framework/, and not android.policy.jar and framework.jar ?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] quywz:
yes,entire script.

somebody tell me "Pls use original jar".I tried to use new jar.but the result is same.:crying:
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Einril:
You don't set the permissions for the files any longer. Is there a reason for that ? Permissions should be 644 I guess.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] quywz:
I tried you said,isnt reason.I had set Permissions 755 and 777,all invalid :crying:

I dont understand why fail.I am finding reason....
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Einril:
Hum, I personally don't find any error in your script then... Maybe this is due to an error in the new files (framework-res.apk, framework.jar or android.policy.jar). I guess you modified them, and maybe you did some mistakes :/
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] quywz:
thx.

I tried to update files one by one.after update framework-res.apk is ok.android.policy.jar is fail.so I dont modfiy android.policy.ja.then optimized it. updating android.policy.odex refer to attached script(not including framework part).but device is NG.

I dont find a NG reason.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] quywz:
today ,I found a problem.dexopt-wrapper android.policy.jar and get android.policy.odex.Compare origial android.policy.odex,we fond dex's magic is different.origial android.policy.odex is "dex035", new origial android.policy.odex is "dex036".if i manually modify different,device is still stay.I guss if i manually modify different,odex's checknum is wrong.what do lead to new odex's magic change?is API Level ?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Einril:
In dexFile.h :

/* current version, encoded in 4 bytes of ASCII */
#define DEX_MAGIC_VERS "036\0"

/*
* older but still-recognized version (corresponding to Android API
* levels 13 and earlier
*/
#define DEX_MAGIC_VERS_API_13 "035\0"

So yes, your dexopt-wrapper uses an API level >= 14 (ICS and JB), whereas your original ROM file must be older.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] quywz:
offical rom version is 4.1.2.so API level should is 16.but extract odex from device is 035.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] quywz:
where download dexFile.h?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Einril:
https://github.com/android/platform_dalvik/blob/master/libdex/DexFile.h

I don't know why the original version magic byte is 0x35, sorry :/
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] quywz:
It doesn't matter.I just found this problem today.which api level?10~13?

running os verson on my device is offical 4.1.2.By theory,the api level is 16 or 17.but .......
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] quywz:
attach file is logcat information.The log file alway display "DexOpt: Some deps went away"
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] xxshabsxx:
Hi there!

I've searched and have no found an answer to my question, in both google and XDA.

I'm trying to change the docked icons on my i9505 (the icons at the bottom of the launcher homescreen). This appears to be the same problem with the S2 on the official Samsung JB release that I could not also edit the dock icons. This is rather frustrating because I would like to remove the browser (internet) icon and change it to chrome.

I'm running the official ROM (XXUAMDE) which is the official Australian ROM.

I have also rooted my phone using Chainfires CF Auto Root

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

On a second question, is there a way to mod the hand gestures (specifically jump) to work with all scrolling applications, such as chrome, spotify etc...? Or will I have to wait until the developers of the respective applications work on that?

Regards,

Alex.
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kevlarman:
In order to move the dock icons, you'll need to edit the others.xml file in /system/csc and change <CscFeature_Launcher_ReplaceHotseatAreaInEditMode> from TRUE to FALSE.
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] well versed:
My others.xml file doesn't have that line? I added it and set it to FALSE but I still cannot move the App tray icon.
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kevlarman:
Really? I'm running the same ROM and can see it in the middle of the file.
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] well versed:
Which ROM are you running? I'm on stock rooted w/ motochopper. And by setting it to FALSE you can move your App Tray icon?
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kevlarman:
Stock with CF root. Yes i can move my icons.
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] xxshabsxx:
Thanks so much man it worked just rebooted after. I searched for days to no avail.

Not sure why anyone else would have issues it should be the same others.xml file.
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ViGiLaNtE351:
Works perfectly

I have been wanting to do this sincei got phone in April. Works perfectly and takes just 2 mins to get it sorted!

Cheers
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Qbancelli:
http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/05/09/new-nexus-7-to-be-highlight-of-google-io-analyst-says

http://www.androidauthority.com/nexus-7-android-4-3-jelly-bean-snapdragon-s4-pro-206454/

First day buy for me.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] mvan4310:
Hmm, Now I get to decide if I should wait for the announcement, or return my Nexus 7 now....
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] BlazinThat:
Looks like I bought mine at the wrong time, oh well.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] pegasus912:
If these specs are accurate, I'm a little concerned about battery life. Doesn't the current gen Nexus 7 have a 4350 mah battery? With a 1080p screen and slightly smaller battery you'd be lucky to get decent battery life even with a more efficient soc. They should have stuck with current resolution or improved battery capacity.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Razorblood:
Looks good but yes concerned about battery life. Also needs 2GB of Ram. But if its $199 for 16GB and $249 for 32GB then its a first day buy for me.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Qbancelli:
Not concerned.

There is no way Google wiil put out a Nexus 7 successor with much worst battery life.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] PVL_93_RU:
Fake
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] microskomp:
i'll be there...

if the specs for the next generation of nexus 7 come even anywhere close to this, i am [IN]. the funniest part of this is the timing... tomorrow i am giving my self-rooted, completely customized and "fully loaded" 1st gen nexus 7 to a good buddy of mine as a gesture of kindness since his ex just left him earlier this week and stole his laptop pc (and much other stuff). i guess karma is on my side right now! ;)
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] chismay:
to be honest....... whats everyone getting excited about? all i see is added cam.?
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] gc84245:
I just bought a used Nexus 7 for a good price, so no 2nd generation Nexus 7 for me...

Oh well, I saved a lot of money and got it a few months earlier (who knows how long it will take us to get it here in Canada, especially if it sells out fast again).

I don't care about the camera since I don't plan to take pictures with it and I have a camera in my smartphone. Slightly better screen and processor is nice but not worth the extra money.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Tommy-Geenexus:
I just bought a nexus and dont need any better specs, for me there's no need to upgrade,if everything runs fast no need for next nexus.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] alicarbovader:
So I was planning for N7 1st gen, but I think I can wait a lil bit more, considering that we have a Qualcomm powered quadcore cpu... The HD front camera + 5MP rear camera are on the line too...... hoping that it will be woth the wait........
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Hreidmar:
It's almost 100% sure that the next gen Nexus 7 will be available but if you wait for the announcement the price of first gen will drop REALLY low, considering that the next one will also sell really cheap.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] lolcopter:
Rear camera is a waste of resources
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Qbancelli:
Another rumor:

"The chipset of choice would be the latest Snapdragon 800 (a.k.a beast) instead of any older model."

http://vr-zone.com/articles/updated...ution-display-and-a-snapdragon-800/20038.html
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Dark Spark:
Agree..
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Ohgami_Ichiro:
I was under the impression that the SD 800 wasn't going to be availible for a few more months (in the Fall iirc)
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] BamAlmighty:
I doubt we will see a Snap Dragon 800 with the existing price point.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] vbanagas:
If Google is planning to release the new Nexus 7 at I/O then it wouldn't include the SnapDragon 800 because as was stated it won't reach production until fall.

I sure hope these specs are true though because I consider that a good upgrade over the current Nexus 7 and will buy it as soon as possible.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] turdbogls:
why did i just read the above post in a VERY loud voice inside my head?

anyway, i dont see this shipping with the SD800, i could see the 600 though but if they are going to keep it the same price point, i would be just peachy with the S4 Pro. its kinda what i figured they would do to keep the price lower, give this a speed increase, a resolution bump, a RAM bump, and a rear camera.

they need two versions for the same price. one with rear camera and S4 Pro, one with no rear camera and Snapdragon 600 :)
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Cor-master:
To each their own I guess.

I mean it's not like I would complain if the new nexus 7 came out with 400ppi, just don't feel it's necessary.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] *child:
I think the higher pixel density does make reading easier, especially over long periods of time
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Cor-master:
I just played with a nook hd and wow, it's screen is phenomenal. How many ppi does it have? Honestly now that it has play store support, I'd probably recommend it over the nexus 7 to anyone in the cheap tablet market who doesn't need GPS or a camera. Quite a bit faster too.

Hope the new nexus 7 has a screen like that
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] BlackFire27:
Lol I'm already half blind. 768 is just fine with me.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Macmee:
As an iPad 3 and Nexus 7 owner yes the iPad's screen kicks the N7's butt.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] PVL_93_RU:
facepalm

That's because iPad 3's screen has almost twice the resolution of N7's one
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Macmee:
That's kind of my point........
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] PVL_93_RU:
Don't mix "density" and "resolution"

N7 density = 216 ppi

iPad 3 density = 264 ppi

Main reason why pad's screen "kicks butt" of N7 is due to Ultra HD resolition, of course that is way better than what N7 offers with its HD display

ppi difference in 50 points shouldn't make THAT much of a difference, plus pad's screen is almost 3 inches biggers, which basically equals both densities
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Macmee:
Oh for crying out loud.

I meant exactly what I said, and what I said is exactly my opinion. I said nothing specifically of pixel density or resolution I said I prefer my iPad's screen to the N7s. It has a higher resolution, higher DPI, better colours IMO and is a larger screen.

You would do well not to put words in my mouth.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] veeman:
What is that little round thing under the home button and to the left a little? :eek:

They're official google images too.

http://www.google.com/nexus/7/
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] FitAmp:
It looks exactly like a light sensor but on the bottom left... Weird
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] PVL_93_RU:
Maybe LED indicator?
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] sgt. meow:
You mean the Notification Pulse thing?
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] PVL_93_RU:
Not exactly, I mean the LED indicator similar to Galaxy Nexus, the placement is pretty much the same (below the screen, but on GNex it's centered unlike on the picture above)
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] sgt. meow:
They are both the same thing aren't they? Or at least they both serve the same purpose - notifications.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] PVL_93_RU:
Oh, then I mistook the name, I just never saw anyone call it "Notification Pulse"
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] player911:
I don't see it. Maybe my Monitors colors are off.

I took a screenshot and screwed with the colors in Adobe Fireworks:

I can really see it now, and I circled it. Very odd that it is off center.

Whats odd too is the image is named, "n7-product-hero.png" from their website.

I'm hoping they bring back the trackball... and an IR Blaster!
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] PVL_93_RU:
I definately can't see that one on my N7, and this is definately not a proximity sensor (since it is placed to the right of the front facing camera)

Is this a teaser for new N7?
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] gc84245:
If you turn your nexus upside down it's in the same spot. Don't know if that's a coincidence or not...
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] PVL_93_RU:
Do you think that Google would really post the pics with N7 being upside down?

Besides, look at the pic - you can definitely see that it's not
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] gc84245:
Wasn't the Nexus 4 upside down?

Anyways, that's not what I'm saying...just saying it's something to think about.

Sent from XDA app
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] veeman:
The "thing" on the bottom seems to be larger than the proximity sensor near the camera. I'm not sure if it's just an oops by one of the Google graphic designers or if it's a hint at something.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Kumczak:
Hello.

I'm currently considering buying the new, yet-to-be-announced Nexus 7. On the internet there are still only some rumours, based on stuff like this one:

https://www.bluetooth.org/tpg/QLI_viewQDL.cfm?qid=20905

Could anyone tell me - based on earlier experiences (Bluetoot SIGs for other devices prior to their release), how long can it take now for the device to be relased?

Also - do you think the price of new N7 will be higher than of the current one?

Thanks in advance :)

Cheers :)
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] gc84245:
If there is a new one, it will be more expensive than the old one because the old one will drop in price. No one knows exactly how much it will cost or when (and if) it will be released.

Sent from XDA app
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] sgt. meow:
If Google follows their device-release patterns, the new Nexus won't be out before November (??). Or at least I think so.

You can never be sure with Google.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Kumczak:
I was rather thinking - will the new device cost the same as the N7 costs now? I mean - if now the cheapest version is ~200$, will the cheapest version of the new N7 also cost 200$? What do you think?

Aww, November is so far away. Many people hope Google will release the refreshed N7 in the same time as the original one, it is around June-July. I hope that too, but i have no idea how would they announce it, as there are no special events in the June, except for GAUC - Google Analytics User Conference in Australia, but i don't know if it's the kind of event that is meant to annouce any new devices.

Thanks for answers :)

Cheers
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] gc84245:
Just to be clear, no one here knows the answer, and anyone who thinks they know is an idiot. All we can do is guess, and your guess is as good as anyone's.

That being said, I guess it will be the same.

Sent from XDA app
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Cor-master:
Yeah there is no proof whatsoever the second generation nexus 7 exists at the moment. The current one had a ton of proof leading up to io. Rumors started after CES when Asus showed off the memo 370T and announced a release date. A couple months later and Asus mysteriously cancels the memo 370T, and a tablet with the model number "me370T" running an unannounced android 4.1 hits the fcc. There was nearly news or rumors for months leading up to the announcement.

Right now we have rumors from "unnamed" sources, no physic proof whatsoever. I believe their definitely will be a second generation nexus 7 but when no one has a clue. Right now their is no true competitor to the nexus 7 so google is probably not too worried about it.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] astarothvie:
new nexus 7

here's a video for google map dated 29 May 2013. That's how we do expect :)

youtu.be/HfzOzkCrWoc?t=54s
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] PVL_93_RU:
I always wondered - how do they do street view in places like parks? Do they use photosphere-like devices or wrap cameras around a helmet on a guy's head?
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] player911:
But the new iPad Mini will be out in Sept. Google needs to stay ahead of Apple like they've always done.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] b22ri22an:
all rumors point toward a july release, there are confirmed shipment of displays and touchscreen controllers for the device leaked by the manufacturers, this puts it on track for a early june beta and a late june completion. i would say a third week of july release and a second week of june annoucment and pre oder. but take that with a grain of salt as i know nothing :)
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] veeman:
I think it's similar to the one on the street view cars but attached to a person.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] sgt. meow:
http://blog.gsmarena.com/purported-...s-an-appearance-in-a-promo-google-maps-video/

If this is gonna be the new N7, I am speechless. It is possibly the stupidest design ever.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Kumczak:
I also hope it won't look like this. Kinda crappy.

I've done a little 'research' on the Bluetooth SIG of 1st-gen Nexus 7

BT SIG date: May 18, 2012,

Nexus 7 release date: July 13, 2012

https://www.bluetooth.org/tpg/QLI_viewQDL.cfm?qid=19478

New BT SIG date: May 27, 2013

next-gen Nexus 7 release date: July 2013?

These are just my speculations or maybe wishes, lol.

Cheers
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] johnny15:
It's a ZTE Optik not the next gen N7. You don't have to be speechless anymore. ;)
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] Cor-master:
Yeah I googled zte optik, exactly what they are showing. People are taking stabs in the dark, why not just wait and see?
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] sgt. meow:
Thank you both. That's the worst-designed tablet I have seen in 3 years. Can never be a Nexus, let alone the latest one.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] BamAlmighty:
Google needs to borrow design elements from the Chrome Pixel and they will have a winner.
[Nexus 7 (2013) General] IRX120:
I bet Google will wait till November and update all 3 of their devices and android. Just in time for Christmas and it makes sense as they did this last year

Sent from my Nexus 4 @1.72 GHz on Stock 4.2.2