yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] blakeslee14:
Got everything working on Stock with the recommended Settings and a slight undervolt. It Runs Silky!

One question though... If I am going to leave the ondemand governor controls alone.. Do I need to still check set on Boot? Thanks!
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] jarylw:
No clue what you meant by this but it's the same for performance. When dragging the slider past 450 and reopening the app, it is back at 450mhz.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] hiazn:
Hmm dunno then, couldve sworn that's what faux said awhile back in the thread... Do a search you'll e what he posted in the past about that very topic
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] faux123:
Overclocking has not been enabled for GPU. You need to wait for next version. 450 MHz is the default max clock.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] pdubzzle:
It seems like every time I install a U kernel it never installs properly, it always boot loops M kernels are fine any ideas? Shostock rom, / att / MDL.. I am currently running the 004m_r3

---------- Post added at 01:26 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:17 AM ----------

moved to att
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] jm6001:
For some reason when I installed this with wanams latest rom MF4 I was getting serous battery drain. It has worked flawless before this experience though.. ROM problem or is it because this kernels for MEA? Any help is appreciated!
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] hiazn:
From a few posts back...
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] harise100:
No 006 on the way?

GT-I9505 update 2 sources are on Samsung server.

My home grown kernel based on them works great with MF4 ROMs. Only Nfc is broken.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] boterkaaseneieren:
No no no don't ask for anything just wait and be patient. Call it xda on written rules.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] harise100:
Be cool.

I had to merge my own changes too, I know how much work it can be.

It was just intended as a tip.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] boterkaaseneieren:
I give you a tip, seen posts of you and your kernel. Xda/sharing:good:
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] harise100:
The problem is, on xda you can get in trouble, if your sources are not properly published, credited, and what not!

See Angelo and the Abyss Kernel history.

No thanks!
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] boterkaaseneieren:
Than publish them with the kernel. It's up to you. Think about it.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] harise100:
I have learned how to build a kernel from XDA university and with Wanams help a month ago.

I made 11 enhancements to the code and my phone runs perfect for MY needs. :)

Learn it yourself if you need another kernel on xda. :p
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] lambstone:
I'm just wondering, since Eco Mode is for battery savings, will frequent toggling of EcoMode result in higher battery usage?

I've set a Tasker Profile to toggle EcoMode when screen is off so I am not sure if that would make a difference.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] faux123:
No need. screen off == 1 core... even better than eco mode ;)
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] lambstone:
Oooh, that's good to know. Cheers!
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] sniperwolf64:
Hi is this Kernel good for Omega 6.0?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] mike216:
Yes it is

SGH-M919_Omega, the end result
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] pride_kr:
No, its not...

Iam having battery drain issues with MF4, and MF2... had a much better battery life with MEA and this kernel 005.

Going back to MEA

Originally Posted by faux123 View Post

Mismatching ROM/kernel is not recommended and it's a crapshoot as far as battery and compatibility are concerned. Only MDK kernel source is available from Samsung officially ...
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] faux123:
Looking for Beta Testers to join in IRC for Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-9505 TouchWiz kernels with MEA/MF2 ROMs :D IRC: #faux-kernels

http://webchat.freenode.net/ <== webclient
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] faux123:
006 is official!

MDX for (MDB~MDM ROM bases)

MEA for (MEA/MF2 ROM bases)

Enjoy!
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] mundixx:
I can't find it here.. http://faux.androidro.ms/jflte/jb42/
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] faux123:
it should be there...
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] mundixx:
Yep, it is now. Must've been uploading at that time. Thanks!
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] nweaver11:
Sorry for the stupid question but which do I choosen for stock TX...MEA or MDX?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] draagon:
Hi, it was said that mismatching rom and kernel is not good. So is 006 compatible or still a mismatching kernel for MF4?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] faux123:
there's no source for MF4, but I heard MEA is working fine with it... What ya gonna do :p
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] revolt1:
which one is for beans? vzw
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] faux123:
Check with your ROM chef to see what base he's using...
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] revolt1:
mdk
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] faux123:
then you have your answer ;)
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] revolt1:
mdx boot loop on me
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] faux123:
Try mainline.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] revolt1:
mea?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] mike216:
No M-stands for main. No over clocking. Your phone might not be able to boot because of the over clocking capabilities

SGH-M919_Omega, the end result
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] revolt1:
faux I used the 004 with over clock
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] brizey:
Mine looped and runs fine on KT over 2GHz.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] mike216:
It's hard to say my friend. Not sure why KT is fine and faux isn't? Are you sure you have the correct kernel version?

SGH-M919_Omega, the end result
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] brizey:
Yep.

I am wondering if my overclock setting stuck somehow. I have a "performance" set up in KTweaks that OC's to 2.1 with a voltage bump. I froze KT's app before flashing faux, but I am wondering now if the oc setting stuck but the voltage bump did not. My SOC is stable to about 2.0 at "stock" voltages on KT but I need to bump to get to 2.1. I would try to do a clean ROM flash but I don't feel like screwing around with wallet, etc.

I used faux's kernels for months at a time on my N7 and I am pretty sure the ultimate kernels do not default to overclocked...they just can be overclocked.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] mike216:
I would agree that I can boot KT because they don't default to max. Maybe try removing Ktweaker then flash

SGH-M919_Omega, the end result
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] -Zork-:
Is the 006 mea are the same for Mf4?

Enviado desde mi GT-I9505 usando Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] milicigoran:
Which one do we use for mf2 based roms?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] bigblue95z:
Look back a page or 2.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] HikingMoose:
My apologies if this has been asked, but it's hard to look through 172 pages. But is there a version that is compatable with an MDL based Verizon ROM?

Sent from my SCH-R970 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] tokoam:
I am running a 9505 rom on my I337 on ATT using fauxclock in the download section of his program its giving me kernel for 9505 which is jflteeur-faux is there anything i can edit maybe in the build prop to change this to my att version which is jflteatt ?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] faux123:
Your build.prop got changed :( change it back via root or es explorer
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] faux123:
MDX
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] tokoam:
Faux may I ask what I really need to change there is alot of mumbo jumbo in there.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] SyNiK4l:
anyone try any of the 006's on MDK? Faux do you by chance know if they may work?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] faux123:
I am using Tmobile MDX on the latest Tmobile ROM and it works perfectly.. I am running u version myself ;)
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] SyNiK4l:
awesome just wanted to make sure I understood the build thing correctly. I now see. MDX covers the range...sorry for re-asking lol. Thanks Faux. Love the kernel. as always.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] vgomez916:
006 running great on sprint rom. Keep up the good work :)
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] julioton:
Sorry for the question...but...what version to use for ME2(international LTE GT—9505)?

Enviado desde mi GT-I9505 usando Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] faux123:
Mirror Site updated with 006 downloads!
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] apeiron6:
Use MDX version :)
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] amihaila:
What can i use foor ME2? I'm using now 03u and had various problems with 04 and 05. I'm on ME2 Djemby Rom.

Thanks
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] apeiron6:
Use 6 MDX version
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] lukemo:
I don't know why, but it seems that with 006u MEA battery drain on Omega 6.0 ROM is much worse than 005. Is it possible? I think I'm going to revert back to 005u.

EDIT: just have seen now that battery drain may be caused by a new app installed. Removed and now checking again 006u drain.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] Netskyliner:
And for Omega rom V6 BMF4?

Edit BMF8 is coming too:)
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] Moz007:
006 U works perfectly ! Do you think 600Mhz GPU is not to much ?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] f100cleveland:
These are the values I change in mine and it detects the correct kernel:

ro.product.model=SAMSUNG SGH-I337

ro.product.device=jflteatt

ro.build.product=jflteatt

Hope that helps.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] nathsgames:
Running perfectly on mine thanks. Omega 6.0.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] fidorulz:
Can I use any of the new kernels on goldeneye since it's based on XXUBMF2

Using canadian phone
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] AnonymeLex:
Hey guys,

I'm on XXUAMDF (French Stock Version), and I installed 006u-MDX_r2, but it seems in faux clock that i cant go further than 1.89 ghz...
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] ludow:
Same here with ME2 version (XXUAME2) plus vibration is stuck at 100%.

EDIT: Vibration is ok now. Fauxclock was crashing at boot. But max clock is 1.89ghz wirh MDX_r2.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] HikingMoose:
Thank you so much sir. I'll be trying it tonight after work.

Sent from my SCH-R970 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] ramon.nmgn:
What about omega rom v6 MF4?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] deathg0d:
Hi i realised something when using faux kernel.

when i filash faux kernel and i go About -> Secure Boot Satus : missing

when i flash adam/KT kernel and i go About -> Secure Boot Status : not missing

what happened?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] :
u and m MEA versions work fine for me. using it on a 337m running foxhound 0.6, which is MF4 based.

-- [MENTION=3332811]faux123[/MENTION]

on a side note...why was the 450 gpu step removed from u? just wondering if there was a reason for that. thanks!
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] blakeslee14:
006 mdx u is working great.

My only issues is that faux clock doesn't remember custom governor control settings. Any thoughts on why?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] ex-28:
hi all rogers i337m here , i flashed

jflteatt-faux123-005m.zip

all was working good but my dual camera stoped working , so i flashed

jflteatt-faux123-004m_r3.zip

now stuck at the "samsung galaxy S4 screen , i tried reflashing the jflteatt-faux123-004m_r3.zip but still get same results.

my build is amdj

reflashed it and this time i cleard the cache and all is fine !

however dual camera is still broken , extremelly lagged.

i tried reading back in the threads about this but came up empty ,
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] coolpepp:
We are using an extended battery so it does matter to much how bad the battery drain is unless its crazy. Can someone please recommend some governer settings to overclock using ondemand? Also can someone please recommend the iosched settings for the sdcard? Thank you.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] kantjer:
There are setting recommendations for both performance and battery on the first page of this thread.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] ex-28:
edt worked after rebooting 3 times. weird.......
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] coolpepp:
Where does it say anything about ondemand overclocking the governor or iosched sdcard settings? I don't think it does. If I follow the OC recommended settings it says to use ondemand but it does not mention on demand governer settings.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] ludow:
Hi,

there is something wrong with jflteeur-faux123-006u-MDX_r2.zip or here. :silly:

I can clock CPU to 1.89 ghz only. Never had problems before.

(XXUAME2)
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] faux123:
Try again.. It was late last night and I was 1/2 sleep.. uploaded the wrong files :p
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] ludow:
Thanks mate. That did the trick. :D

Cheers!
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] Moz007:
Sorry, i ask again, 600Mhz GPU is not too high for hardware ?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] Metallice:
The reason you didn't get an answer is because there isn't one.

You will have to find out. Every chip is different.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] faux123:
600 MHz booted fine on my own amazing phone (can do 2.3 GHz without breaking a sweat). Unfortunately it's not stable for most users. I have removed the option.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] Moz007:
My chip seem to be able to handle it but the % of gain is very huge ! :eek:
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] GODSPD:
can someone please advise me which kernel I can install on my s4 lte international - running Omega ROM v6 and had the MEA firmware prior but due to the modem upgrade to get wifi working the build number is now MF4... I did try 006u-MEA but phone would not boot, so had to revert to the old one... Which can I flash in that case?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] faux123:
try m version :p
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] Easton999GS:
Faux i can run 2.1GHz with 627 MHz GPU on Ktoonz kernel flawlessly, but i cant boot on the 006u kernel. I think there is an issue with the kernel. Is it possible that you make the kernel run with stock settings on boot and we overclock it as we please?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] CC268:
My ROM doesn't say whether it is MEA, MDM, or the other one under Build Number...just says CleanROM Odex
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] boterkaaseneieren:
Stupid question, what's the differences between mdx and mdx_r2?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] AnonymeLex:
I can now go up more than 1.89 ghz, but i still cant reach 600 mhz on gpu -》mdx_r2
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] faux123:
Removed GPU oc.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] AnonymeLex:
Why ? :(

---------- Post added at 11:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:25 PM ----------

Can we use MF8 with this kernel ?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] design12:
Hi there just wanted to verify something..I have the tmobile version of the S4 and im running the stock tmobile rom with the MDL base. So from what I been reading in the last couple of pages for the version 006m I would choose the mdx version as my base correct? Just wanna make sure thanks.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] Moz007:
I am running MF8 with 006 U and no problem.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] CC268:
Somone please help...Is this ROM ==> http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2305781

MEA or MDX?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] BlackGURU:
I think MEA is for the international Version, so this might be MDX or MDK Actually
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] CC268:
Well it is in the Verizon folder...wouldn't that be in the international folder...?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] ggrant3876:
A noob question, I just went back to stock and rerooted. Going to run stock rooted for a bit. The 006 kernel I'm not sure mdx or mea, I know which is the OC GPU already.

Thanks in advance.

Edit:

I'm a T-Mo M-919.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] BlackGURU:
What Do You Mean
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] CC268:
There is both mdx and mea in the verizon folder...so your saying mea is for Verizon International version? This is just really frustrating..
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] HikingMoose:
So both mdx kernels failed and aborted on mdx builds with Verizon's clean Rom. I'm on a jflteusc device. That might be why.

I know you have a ton on your plate, but is there anyway of getting a jflteusc version?

Sent from my SCH-R970 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] CC268:
so....use MEA for verizon then?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] :
No. Verizon base is not at MEA.

I took a look at a couple other ROMs in the Android thread. most recent builds are using MDK...in fact..the threads in the VZW sub forum said that in the OP...I stopped after looking at 5 different ROMs. One of the ROMs even had MDK right in the title of the thread....

MD...meaning MDX is the kernel you want.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] ex-28:
I was totally confused at first as well as to what version to install
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] EVOme:
OP says for MDB~MDM ROM base users, use 004_r3.....Yet when you visit the site you see this? Which is it?

jfltevzw-faux123-004m_r3.zip

jfltevzw-faux123-004u_r3.zip

That whole OP is rather confusing, TBH
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] faux123:
Not sure why it's confusing...

It's very clear what to flash if you read the change log.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] HikingMoose:
Maybe (I wont hold my breath) Faux will make a kernel for us USC users. It would be amazing, and we have our own awesome forum with a bunch of skilled users and a few developer types, so we could offer support for ourselves. We wouldn't ask tons of questions all day, everyday. So please consider it Faux, it would be appreciated!

Sent from my SCH-R970 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] harise100:
It sounds harder than it actually is... I am a Windows developer, Linux is mostly uncharted territory for me. :)

If it ever fully works, I maybe post it, but don't expect any fancy modding.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] luuranko3:
Me and works aw3some thank you faux!!!
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] Mr_Q:
So.. what about the open source implementation found here:

https://code.google.com/p/exfat/

Is it possible to implement this in the kernel instead of the Samsung source code?

You might also want to take a look here:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=38182488#post38182488
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] iamnotkurtcobain:
Will there be cm10.1 support? Please!!!!! :)

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9505 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] boterkaaseneieren:
There is not even a cm10.1 worth flashing. Andd the one that is posted has its own kernel. What's wrong with that one?

Please don't ask for eta's.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] thuglifesk:
I tried to flash this on the canadian variant but it said assert failed
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] boterkaaseneieren:
The Canadian model is jfltecan.

See no kernel for you here
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] Trev420:
Uhm I've been using a cm10.1 'worth flashing' on my tmobile gs4. What's wrong with building a kernel for it?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] thuglifesk:
Y no canadian love faux?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] faux123:
Lol, blame Samsung :p
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] myname70:
While flashing thru TWRP it says assert failed no jflte.... ( i am with I9505, ME2 rooted ROM, EU)

PS: How can I find what si my model - jftleeur or another?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] :
Actually, the SGH-M919V source is already released. But.. the better question is:

Why no canadian devs to show canadian S4 love?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] thuglifesk:
Y is this device any different than any other samsung devices. I was runnin faux on my s3

---------- Post added at 05:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:20 PM ----------

I have the i337m
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] boterkaaseneieren:
I am just very careful with the only kernel dev for I9505. He just released it. And asking for more is not polite.

If you see his started threads than your question is answered. He made aosp kernels. So in time there will be more. Just be patient.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] RoseN-95:
Battery compared to stock?

And I do have to flash a recovery in Odin and then install the kernel from the recovery, right?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] myname70:
Where/how to find what is mine version?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] btemtd:
Not sure why u all of a sudden u got 26k antutu after flashing this kerbel. For me its exactly the same no performance increase what so ever.. so faux..... xda users must pay to control your kernel?
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] damador:
i call this donation :) didnt had chance to use his work yet ( he didint programed for note) but reading other galaxy forums seems taht he deserve it :)
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] Swanseatom:
Not must, many alternative apps if you don't want to pay. However, Paying the small price for the awesome apps supports the developer to keep bringing us these awesome things.
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] tvhak:
what delete? tried to delete but didn't help so i guess i deleted the wrong

thanks
[Galaxy S 4 i9505 Original Android Development] faux123:
ok... I will add support for USC... it was really quiet before... but once I get enough signal-to-noise ratio, then I start to notice you guys ;)

EDIT:

BTW, I need 100% stock boot.img from USC's latest OFFICIAL ROM and I need to know what BASE (MDB/MDL/MDK/MDM or MEA/MF4 etc). I also need to know if the boot loader is LOCKED or not (ie, do I need to loki or not)