yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kingxklick:
Not pestering at all sorry forgot to answer that question.

Implementing the code for it, it will be implemented and enabled next release (#3)

Thanks man much appreciated.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kingxklick:
Yah man np upload and post it and I'll take a look.

If I remember correctly perseus kernel doesn't use voodoo sound engine which is why nothing happens it's not in use or enabled. He has an updated sound engine but it's not voodoo.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kingxklick:
Posted a download mirror per your requests :)

Kernel #3 is completed just been testing everything to be safe. Release aimed for today (the 23rd)
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] master.peterm:
King I've been following you since the g1 days.... Any eta on that eris2g1 update :P
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kingxklick:
Haha didn't know people even used g1's anymore.

Release tonight guys changelog almost done.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] Tiffany84:
Will do. Thank you very much. By the way, didn't you use to build kernels for the EVO 4g? I remember someone with a similar name building some of the best kernels for that device.

Edit: Here is the boot.img from Miui.

http://d-h.st/qYP

Thanks again.

Sent from my SGH-T889 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kingxklick:
Haha ah the good ol snapdragon days. Good to see you around still.

Ok cool ill post a boot.img for miui and see if that doesn't fix a few things.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] Tiffany84:
That would be so awesome. I'd really appreciate it. So nice to see you back. Those EVO kernels were out of control and I mean that in a good way. A very good way.

Sent from my SGH-T889 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] Zombtastic:
Is cm/aosp support gonna be in #3? Or is that something you're working on getting in later on?
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kingxklick:
Kernel #3 live guys. Changelog coming up as we speak
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kingxklick:
I'm looking into it.

If I remember correctly it requires a whole new source tree but I'll start looking into that especially over the weekend because I'd love to port my kernel over to the aosp side of things. If anyone could shed light on this it'd save me some time. I've always been a htc guy so I have my moments of uncertainty on small things like this :p

Changelog live for kernel #3 btw.

Enjoy all.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] scottPilgrim:
anybody else seeing 8700 quadrant scores with #3??

dat fsync disabled

also, regarding the fsync, does this "dynamic fsync" have any kind of safety feature in case there is a crash when the screen in on?

if i'm not mistaken, screen on = fsync disabled and screen off = enabled

the logical issue i see there is that most reboots/issues occur during live use, when the screen is on.

an example of a safety feature that i am talking about would be say a kernel panic is detected, all cache is flushed immediately.

?

thanks, still running strong.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] Tiffany84:
If you ever need somewhere to host your work feel free to send me a pm.

Sent from my SGH-T889 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] anhmuonm:
Hey King, thanks for the newest version#3 of your kernel work. I am actually using your kernel ver.2 with MyROM Revolution 7.1. It works perfectly fine with very amazing battery life, more than 1 day. I don't know whether or not I should update to ver. 3 of your kernel. I check your OP and don't really see a major change in ver. 3. So I may pass it this time. Anyway, thank you for your hard work!
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] rmriggin:
Love the performance but my exfat formatted sd card still doesn't work with king kernel =(.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kingxklick:
Have you tried using the exfat support script for now?
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kingxklick:
It's up to you buddy. I'm a if it ain't broken why fix it guy myself but there are a few good things added in 3 like charge control fsync and a few other notable changes. Cool thing is if for some reason you don't like it, kernel #2 is just a flash away and you're right back where you were with no issues. The beauty of just swapping the kernel. :)
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] scottPilgrim:
having issues now... not quite sure why, it was running great then started locking up for a few seconds, touchscreen would become unresponsive, etc... maybe just a bad download. gonna re-install it and if it does it again i will pull a log for you sir.

In the meantime, not sure why devs have started to not do this like they used to, but an MD5 summary for downloads would be useful. Throwing the dice if you flash a corrupt download...

from terminal, you can do it...

su (for root access, not sure if you need it, but requires no time to type simply 2 characters and push enter)

md5sum /mnt/extSdCard/king2.zip (as an example... just type the file path and file name)

you will get a generated md5 sum of the file.

keep up the good work
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] rmriggin:
I have not looked into that option. Thought it was for cm10.1/aosp based roms unless I'm looking at the wrong script mod.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] sargentmajord:
Hey just a heads up I don't know what u did to kernel #3 but it destroyed RAM performance :/
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kingxklick:
Yah ill remember to post that in the future good point
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kingxklick:
Hmm Haven't heard that yet.

To be honest with u my rams benchmarking higher I can post a screeny. Which is surprising it should be around the same to ne honest.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] ROM_MAN:
Here are my best quadrant score with the king kernel #3 oc to 1.9
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] sargentmajord:
Yeah idk what happened but my ram performance was cut in half :confused:
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] jonjinbae:
So what is the typical on screen times you guys are getting?
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kingxklick:
I'll try to remember to look for that in settings but what I will say is I charge my phone every few days now it's real convenient I love it.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] jay661972:
This kernel is fast only issue im having opening some apps it lags, ie. Phone, messaging. Not sure why but no biggie just wanted to point out
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kingxklick:
Just faced a pretty scary situation while testing for 2ghz overclock. It's just not worth it imo. Ended up having to restore from nandroid which luckily fixed it thank God.

Going to allocate my time towards better more reliable ways to speed things up overall like I have been.

The extra voltage and instability that comes with 2ghz just isn't worth it. There's a reason every kernel tops out below 2ghz.

Had to try it to see for myself I guess. I did implement a couple additions I've been meaning to and plan on a few more so #4 is coming along.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] robl45:
couple of questions before I try this. By default, does it overclock or is it just standard unless you change the settings? What app is recommended to change the settings?

Does nandroid on this phone restore the previous kernel? I know on my Epic, when you did a nandroid, and restored, it restored everything but left the same kernel.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] sargentmajord:
Carbon rom is clocked at 2 GHz an they use trinity kernel an it runs just fine so ur either not compiling the kernel right or u should ask for some help from other devs that have gotten 2 GHz stable I even remember a time that I got the note 2 stable at 2.142 GHz stable I think it was originally either trinity or perseus an idk why they down clocked it it was pretty disappointing when they did
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] scottPilgrim:
Because there is absolutely no reason to push your hardware like that... Just because it is stable doesn't mean you aren't damaging something
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] sargentmajord:
Umm yeah there is there are people who like to have an OC like that even though there is no real world advantage to it but I guarantee u that after 2 yrs ur going to want to push ur hardware like that just to get phone to work cuz look at the droid bionic best smartphone on the market in 2011 but now u have to OC it to 1.5 GHz just to get it to function with today's apps so don't be an idiot an think there is no reason to do this yeah for now it's just for bragging rights but once this phone reaches it's EOL those bragging rights become something that keeps the phone going till ur next contract or have enough money for a new phone an the Exynos can handle up to 2.3 GHz without issues so 2 GHz is a walk in the park so don't act like u know what the hardware can handle when u don't even do ur research first hell the Exynos needs to OCed to 2 GHz just to stay on par with the Snapdragon S4 Pro at 1.780 GHz since qualcoms cpu is 15% more powerful I don't mean to be rude but ignorant people tick me off
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] Mnementh666:
Damn dude. Punctuation. It's your friend.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] sargentmajord:
I give to craps about punctuation especially on mobile
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] Tiffany84:
I'm not trying to be rude but instead of saying he's not compiling correctly or he's doing something wrong why don't you build your own kernel? The way your acting is no way to get someone to do something for you.

Sent from my SGH-T889 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] Mnementh666:
Please show me a reliable source that states the Exynos 4412 can be safely clocked to 2.3 ghz. I've done just a bit of googling, but all I'm seeing is the Sammy docs that 1.4 - 1.6 ghz clocks, and a lot of devs having issues running >1.8.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] Tiffany84:
Delete
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] sargentmajord:
It was a suggestion cuz he saying something is impossible when other devs have done it i suggested that he ask someone an i don't need to build my own kernel an i am not saying he has to do it he is free to do what he wants but when u say something is impossible when other devs have done it just shows ignorance instead of asking a dev who has done it for a little assistance

---------- Post added at 03:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:01 PM ----------

This is why I should have saved my set cpu of 2.3 GHz I'll try an find it but not exynos processors can do it mine was one of the lucky ones also googling specs isn't going to tell u anything cuz most manufactures do not post the max clock speed that an cpu can meet if they can't post a 95% success rate plus most manufacturers severely underclock for instance the i7 3770k runs perfectly at 4.5 GHz but is underclocked to 3.5 GHz
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] Mnementh666:
I didn't say you *couldn't*. I said show me a reliable source. OC'ing your personal SGN2 to 2.3ghz isn't anything. I OC'd my G2/DZ from 800mhz to 2.0ghz, but that's moot.

My point is you said

which I call shenanigans on.

Your phone =/= all Exynos 4412's. Maybe you got a good batch. Great on ya. Just because you can do it on your phone doesn't mean that everyone can. And given the possibility of burning up the CPU or other permanent damage result from a 50% OC, I believe the dev for this kernel is taking the right path.

Have a nice day.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] sargentmajord:
Well the thing is carbon rom is at 2 GHz after flashing so tell me why nobody has burned up their cpus then cuz they compiled the kernel so it uses less volts an still maintain an OC it's all about voltage that will kill a cpu not the frequency OCing is an art form u have to find the balance between the right amount of voltage to supply the additional OC without giving it to much which results in heat an damage to the cpu u could easily clock the Exynos up to 4 GHz with the proper cooling but since it's in a phone the cooling is highly impractical so u have to find the proper voltage that will power the higher frequence without causing more heat an possible damage an carbon rom has succeeded in doing just that
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] scottPilgrim:
Umm, excuse me? Who the hell are you again? Sorry but I promise you I know a lot more about this stuff than you do sergeantlovesD

You are a moron. Do us all a favor and take your ranting logic elsewhere. This is a forum with intelligence, not people who don't know how to use a comma or period.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] sargentmajord:
Lmao just cuz i don't have time to do punctuation doesn't me i am not intelligent I am the one that created the fxz an help build the Hob for the droid razr an droid bionic during the leaked updates I am the one who told everyone about the bionic get JB months before it was released I am the one who reported the Motorola ghost phone(not to mention the us cellular an t mobile variants still have to drop by the FCC which they will in about a week or 2) who do u think supports 69,000 members on droidrzr.com lol u think I don't know anything well that's where ur sorely mistaken I single handlely stole over 5000 members from Droid forums cuz they followed me an SamuriHL because of the information we provide I was just trying to provide useful information for the developer but u guys took it out of context
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kingxklick:
Lol that's my point exactly. I have to agree with scott. Have you seen how much voltage is being used to get those frequencies to run stable? It's just not worth the damage over time for a tiny speed boost.

I might increase the voltage and try one more time we'll see.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kingxklick:
And I never once said it's impossible......

Why would i say it's impossible after using it last night lol. What I did say is I don't like how much voltage is needed for it to run 100% stable.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] sargentmajord:
Umm should be able to accomplish 2 GHz at 13000 if not 13500 mv I have 19820 stable at 12500 mv which I have to do with my gpu OCed at 800 mhz cuz if I don't the cpu will hit 80c an throttle to 800 mhz an again i am not saying this to be rude at all I just saying that giving up an saying that this is impossible when other devs have done it doesn't mean it's not possible
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] scottPilgrim:
English bro. Try it.

Awesome you have been able to UV like a mad man to get it to run stable without reboots and other issues. The problem is not everyone has the same chip set. What is stable for one is not even close for another. What damages one (over short or long periods of time) will not damage the other, and the other way around.

I never claimed to "know everything" as you accused me of. You, however, came in here with your awesome credentials (which aren't much so stuff it) being critical.

Do us all a favor and stfu with your bro knowledge.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kingxklick:
Once again never said it was impossible lol
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] sargentmajord:
An that's not what I am understanding hundreds of people that are running carbon rom are at 2 GHz with no problems hell the nexus 4 got a bump from 1.7 to 1.8 what am I missing?
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] scottPilgrim:
I talk to morfic pretty regularly I'll talk to him about it and see what he says about it.

But honestly, the thing you are missing is that just because you are not having a reboot every day, or when playing a graphically intense game for 2 hours, doesn't mean you are not putting unnecessary wear and tear on your hardware.

I'm sure they have a safety factor. But it is not worth it in my opinion to find out what that is. Tell me of a game that you can play clocked at 2 GHz that you can't play at 1.6.... The fact of the matter is you can't. There aren't any games on the market right now that max this device past its performance limits. So why risk damaging a $700 device?

Over clocking is overrated. Period. A slight over clock is useful, just a little bit extra, but anything past 1.8 on this device is simply unnecessary. Period. There is no reason to push your hardware like that at all. You are talking about a difference in 800 MHz of overall processing power out of 8 GHz.

Basically 7.2 GHz or 8... No difference in noticeable performance at all. None.

So say what you want about what you think is safe for your device, good for you. The fact of the matter is you are not an engineer, nor do you have the knowledge to say what is stable and what isn't. Just because it seems so, doesn't mean it is.

That is what you are missing.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kingxklick:
All I will say is there's a reason every kernel released ends up topping its highest frequency around 1.8 1.9 ghz in the end. Sure they may have released a 2.0 or even 2.1 oc as a proof of concept but end up taking it out eventually. There's a reason for this. Think about what im sayin thats all im sayin. Haha :p let's be happy its memorial day.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] sargentmajord:
Soo just a suggestion what happens once the device reaches EOL that overated OC will keep the phone going cuz there are some people that can't change out new phones every 4 to 5 months like u or i can I mean this phone is just to tinker with an see how far I can take it i already have the latest an greatest phones an continue to get them but lol i like to see how far a device can go before it craps out xD
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] scottPilgrim:
That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Assuming you are saying EOL = end of life, which refers to the devices service like (speaking of material half life).

Here is where your logic is flawed... Try to follow this:

You state that most people cannot buy a new device before their contracts will allow them. This is true. So here is a question: do you honestly think that running your processor nearly 40% faster, is going to have no effect on the material half life of the device?

You are like.... That guy who buys a Ferrari, puts a turbo charger on it, simply because you have this compulsory need to be able to go as fast as possible even though you are already the fastest car on the road. No reason whatsoever, simply because you want to push its limits.

See, most people are satisfied with the speed provided already, because they understand it is more than enough to do what they do on a daily basis, whether it be driving to work, or going to the track, it gets the job done and much more.

You are able to get a device every 4 to 5 months, therefore you don't care about running your device into the dirt if that's what happens to it. You'll just get another one. You are 1% of the users on this site.

Another issue is that most people cannot accurately and intelligently weigh the risks of running their devices this aggressive and will do it simply because they can.

Bottom line is king is being responsible by not haphazardly tossing some crazy clock rate into his kernels because he understands what I just explained to you - devs are responsible for the damage of a device if they are being irresponsible and not looking out for newer users who have very little technical prowess.

Throwing a little disclaimer in there saying "I'm not responsible for blah blah blah..." No, you are. Sorry. Tossing a 16 year old the keys of a Lamborghini and saying "OK be careful son" is bad parenting. I think you see my point.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kingxklick:
Added a few things you all asked for, would love to release tonight. If I have the time I definately will. Keep an eye out for it.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] Tiffany84:
I just wanted to say every statement you've made has been SOOO on point. I wouldn't continue to waste your time.

Sent from my SGH-T889 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] sargentmajord:
U think what u want but u try running ur note 2 2 yrs from now without an OC an tell me if it still functions decently these phones are computers an what happens when technology advances an u don't have the money for the next latest an greatest hardware well u OC ur current hardware to keep up until u can get new hardware it's a fact that OCing is needed especially at the pace that technology goes an well of people are stupid enough to flash something there phone can't handle so be but I'll tell u now flashing a kernel with a high OC won't destroy a phone if it can't handle it takes time for the processor to break down an finally not work the worst u will get from this are freeze ups an reboots which tell u if ur OC is to high also set cpu has something called a long bench test an if u get higher than a 200 ms when u have the cpu maxed then ur OC is to high an ur causing harm I am just stating facts u guys are the one that misinterpreted what I was trying to say to shorten it all in a few words I was saying that 2 GHz is possible without causing damage if done right it has been proven an works on all devices also that when a phone is near or at EOL it will require an OC to function until u can get a new device I have given proof of that as well
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] scottPilgrim:
I tried reallll hard to read that. Made it about half way.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] kingxklick:
Come guys let's stay on topic please you've both made your points.

Still testing #4

Added things you've all been asking for. And something extra I hope ;) still testing

Thank you all :)
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] i_guana:
One last point about overclocking:

One thing that always needs to be understood about how overclocking seems to barely improve real-world performance is component timing. Each component of the compute system inside a modern smartphone has been designed to follow extremely strict timings between the CPU, RAM and other components. These BUS timings way heavily on the affects of overclocking. Take a PC as an example. if you overclock the CPU but don't leave the the BUS and RAM timing synchronized with the CPU you will actually lose performance which in turn requires even more overclocking just to make up for the asynchronous environment you've created. Overclocking your phone creates such an environment making your phone less efficient and having to work harder to do the same functions. Keep this in mind when you're thinking about overclocking. I gave up on it. Too much cost for too little reward.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] robl45:
Could somone help me with these questions please? Would like to run the kernel but need to know the answers before I flash it.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] TmobileDash12:
If my memory serves me correctly, isn't this the guy who was banned from XDA back in the G1 days?

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=7027241&postcount=19
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] VECTUS:
OK the op was a a puppy of perma banned member kingklick so op was perma banned again. All links removed. Sorry everyone...
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] RRibeiro:
Hello all.

I have facebook installed and I want to use the floating SMS notifications, anyone know how to turn it on?

I had it working once, but cince I installed a new Rom, I can put it working.

Thanks
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tuxonhtc:
You mean chatheads right? Install facebook messenger, settings->Notifications->chat heads
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] RRibeiro:
Thanks, going to try it.
[Asus Transformer TF700] BoosterSilver:
I'm running CROMI-X 4.4.1 Whenever the screen is off the tab constantly beeps every 2 seconds. It charges fine enough and the beeping stops as soon as the screen is turned on. Is anyone else having this problem? Could it be a problem with the charging port or cord? I couldn't find anything in settings to turn this off. It's making it really hard to sleep at night when I normally charge it.:eek:
[Asus Transformer TF700] ShadowLea:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2241818

Something like that?

Just mute it. The toggle is the speaker icon in the notification panel's Quick Settings.
[Asus Transformer TF700] BoosterSilver:
Thanks. I was hoping there was a way to keep it so I'd still have my normal sound notifications on and stop the beeping/chiming. Oh well.