yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] colakzd:
Hi everyone!

I am experiencing some strange problems and I am hoping that someone could help me as I have tried everything i knew so far.

I experience this problem on every 4.2 ROM such as Supernexus, Temasek Cyanogenmod etc.

Every time I restart my phone (GT-i9300) no one can hear me during a call and I can't hear nothing either. The call is placed but there is no sound.

I have tried deleting everything(internal memory, cache, dalvik..) reflashing several times still the same, flashing other basebands, still not working.

This does not happen on ROMs based on Samsung offical firmware.

Thank you!
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Glebun:
This is a known issue, use search.

Enable dialpad and/or lockscreen sounds
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] colakzd:
I just found that out in one of the threads. Thank you!
[Galaxy S II General] tryptophane:
This thread is intended for (ongoing) developper discussion about the EXIF bug in the camera of cm 10.1. The discussion began in the official cm 10.1 thread, but we felt it would be better to continue in an own thread.

The subject is about to find how to fix the two last tags in the EXIF data of pictures shot with the camera from cm 10.1 which don't contain proper values, ShutterSpeedValue and ExposureTime. The other bugs in the EXIF were already fixed by ghepeu during the last days.
[Galaxy S II General] tryptophane:
Let's begin right now:

Yes the values are re-occuring, for example I very often get 405 and 505. They are not random and they depend on how much light there is while taking the picture (which is logical for shutter speed). More light = higher value.

To see the values I inserted a log output statement in my local sources and use the app aLogcat to retrieve it (is this a noob method?)
[Galaxy S II General] beggar23:
First of all: thanks a lot for starting a separate thread for this issue here!

What seems to be interesting is if the structure of the value for ShutterSpeedValue might indeed be like xyz, while x stands for the actual shutter speed and xy stand for something else.

So if someone can log a fair number of shutter speed values (gained while taking pictures in the dark, in the sunlight etc) and list them, we were able to have look

if the first digit x, after calculating with the help of the given formula, is in the reach of possible shutter speeds, like 1/8, 1/16, 1/32 and so on.

if the last two digits yz have re-occuring values, so that we could try to extrapolate their nature and maybe real purpose.

It is all just a guess and my possibly naive thoughts might lead to nowhere. But, anyway... :angel:
[Galaxy S II General] opaco23:
Looking at EXIF of old images taken with stock ROM:

$ exiv2 -u -pv print 20120126_121609.jpg
...
0x9201 Photo ShutterSpeedValue SRational 1 432/100
...

Maybe you need to use a fixed denominator of 100?
[Galaxy S II General] ghepeu:
That's interesting, can you print the hex values too ('-h' flag)?

Could you do that for all the values? I'd like to see if there are other things that we're missing, I have no idea what most of them mean so I don't know if what we're getting is sane.

Thank you.
[Galaxy S II General] tryptophane:
I think I got it now, thanks to the hint from opaco23 :) Very useful params that you used for exiv2 ;)

with this in exynos_exif.c:

exif_attributes->shutter_speed.num = shutter_speed;

exif_attributes->shutter_speed.den = 100;

I get what seems to be proper values in the EXIF tag:

$ exiv2 -u -pv print IMG_20130507_221211.jpg

0x9201 Photo ShutterSpeedValue SRational 1 564/100

$ exiv2 -p a IMG_20130507_221211.jpg

Exif.Photo.ShutterSpeedValue SRational 1 1/50 s

564 is the value of the shutter_speed variable in exynos_exif.c. I think this should be correct.
[Galaxy S II General] opaco23:
Sorry for slow reply. Attached is output of "exiv2 -u -PExgnycvh print foo.jpg", and I also checked

my other photos (not many, I didn't use the camera often), and the ShutterSpeedValue

is always N/100.
[Galaxy S II General] tryptophane:
Hmmm, still have no solution for exposure time... I don't understand the relation to shutter speed now... But we have to calculate exposure time from shutter speed value, as the camera always gives back zero for exposure time...

This is for an old picture I shot with stock samsung firmware before I switched to cm:

$ exiv2 -u -pv print 20120804_212207.jpg

0x829a Photo ExposureTime Rational 1 1/20

0x9201 Photo ShutterSpeedValue SRational 1 432/100

$ exiv2 -p a print 20120804_212207.jpg

Exif.Photo.ExposureTime Rational 1 1/20 s

Exif.Photo.ShutterSpeedValue SRational 1 1/20 s

In the second representation of the data, it's the same value for exposure time and shutter speed. But the interesting one is the first. I don't know how the 432/100 can be converted to 1/20.

ghepeu is right, we should also check all the other EXIF values for plausibility...

But now I'm tired and go to sleep ;)
[Galaxy S II General] ghepeu:
Thank you!

Yes, I think that with that change the ShutterSpeedValue is ok.

I was looking to the other tags, and there are some differences in FNumber and the various SomethingAperture. As far as i can see, all those differences depend on the macros found in hardware/samsung/exynos4/hal/include/Exif.h, becase they round the value to int so soon that a big error is carried on to the calculations in exynos_exif.c.

The attached patches for Exif.h and exynos_exif.c change the macros, a few defines and some calculations to keep two decimal places of precision and the results i get seem ok. I don't know if we can modify that file, though, it seems it was originally samsung code and maybe it should be left as it is.

Incidentally this seems to have fixed the BrightnessValue too, now it gives me ~100 cd/m² on a picture of my monitor, before it gave huge values.

What do you think?

PS. the change for ShutterSpeedValue is included to, and a fix for a typo.
[Galaxy S II General] tryptophane:
Hey, nice work again! :cowboy:

Maybe you could change this (let's avoid magic numbers ;) ):

- exif_attributes->shutter_speed.den = 100;

+ exif_attributes->shutter_speed.den = EXIF_DEF_APEX_DEN

Where did you take the number 265 from? I mean, why not 260?

-#define EXIF_DEF_FNUMBER_NUM 26 /* 2.6 */

+#define EXIF_DEF_FNUMBER_NUM 265 /* 2.65 */

As far as I can see here at work (with the rather bad app "Jpeg Exif Viewer") the values look ok compared to old pictures of mine. BrightnessValue looks plausible now.

As cm doesn''t use samsung's blobs anymore for writing the exif data, I guess it should be ok to modify exif.h...

Your patch for exynos_exif.c has an explicit path in the header, had to edit it in order to be able to apply it. Not shure if the exif.h patch would have worked, I edited its header without trying to apply it in the original version. It's better to have old and new file in the same folder before creating the patch, but you know it ;)

We still lack a correct value for ExposureTime. Don't know if this could be of help (taken from the Exif 2.2 specs from exif.org):

ShutterSpeedValue (Tv) = - log 2 (exposure time)

Hey you have 76 thanks for 14 posts, that's not bad, almost as good as Codeworkx's ratio ;)
[Galaxy S II General] tryptophane:
Maybe I was a little bit hasty with this statement, I don't know which other samsung devices the changes could affect...
[Galaxy S II General] ghepeu:
I thought about it, but since shutter speed is not directly related to the other values that use that constant I didn't want to tie it to them. Shouldn't be an issue, though.

It comes from opaco23 and stone_ship data. It make sense to use it, imho, if the camera blob used it instead of 2.6.

Thanks, that's what happen when you post things late at night... I replaced the patch on my previous post.

It could, I'll take a look this evening.
[Galaxy S II General] tryptophane:
Yeah, saw it was very late ;) What timezone are you in?
[Galaxy S II General] Darius_bd:
.

Excellent work being done here, keep it up ;)

Idk if it helps, but in the old pics I have taken with early CM10 (with Samsung;s blobs, right?) the ExposureTime value range goes from ~1/5518 secs (value "0.000181225084816106" secs) to ~1/14secs (value "0.0714285746216774" secs) and additionally 1/2 or 0.5 secs for night mode.

The ShutterSpeed ranges from 12.4300003051758 to 3.82999992370605 (comment on the Exif Pilot prog: The unit is the APEX (Additive System of Photographic Exposure) setting.). Maybe the raw values rather refer to the Exposure than the Speed? Like 1/504?

There's a thing also that I dont know if it has some influence. Afaik, there are two camera models for the i9100, one made by Sony and the other by Samsung. I dont know if they may output different data, or since both are serviced by a Fujitsu chip, the output is the same. Just FYI.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1765679
[Galaxy S II General] tryptophane:
Hi ghepeu, has there been any more progress from your side? Did you submit your last changes?
[Galaxy S II General] ghepeu:
Had a couple of very busy days :/ I'll submit both patches later and we'll see if changes to Exif.h are allowed or not.
[Galaxy S II General] tryptophane:
Hi ghepeu,

this fixes the ExposureTime bug:

in Exif.h, add:

#define APEX_SHUTTER_TO_EXPOSURE(x) (int) (pow(10, x /100.0 * log10(2.0)))

in exynos_exif.c:

exif_attributes->exposure_time.num = 1;

exif_attributes->exposure_time.den = APEX_SHUTTER_TO_EXPOSURE(shutter_speed);

Not shure if the function should be named APEX_* though...
[Galaxy S II General] tryptophane:
People are reporting in the cm10.1 thread that EXIF-data is not shown well in Picasa... I'm not willing to test it, because I don't want to use all those google services. Don't even have a G+ account... But maybe this will be fixed anyway by the last modificatons...
[Galaxy S II General] ghepeu:
That's fantastic! Wouldn't pow(2, x / 100) work all the same, though?
[G2 and Desire Z Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] yeegf:
Vision pvt ship s-off

Hboot-0.85.0005

microp-0425

Radio-26.03.02.18_m3

emmc-boot

Oct 11 2010, 20:10:38

Unrooted

Reboot upon load to lock screen.

Tried multiple roms.

Factory reset followed by cache wipe.

Then rom is installed, no gapp package was installed.

Permissions unfixed and phone was restarted.

*edit- tried restart after permissions fixed. Not working still

Could it be that it's overheating? Doesn't feel hot

Any experience or idea what is going on?
[G2 and Desire Z Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] demkantor:
first try to get a logcat if possible then i would start by seeing which emmc i have.

then, either way, i would proceed to rooting the proper way as in following the xda wiki to root.

after this i would update my radio and recovery then flash a known stable rom

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1983163
[G2 and Desire Z Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] yeegf:
It's impossible to pull a logcat without adb, everytime i get to lockscreen it just reboot.

could it be that I flashed a desire z rom and my g2 isn't compaitible with it?
[G2 and Desire Z Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] demkantor:
you can have a logcat running while its booting until it restarts, or you can let it restart, boot to recovery and pull a last_kmsg

I also would recommend trying another rom
[One (M7) Accessories] relic120:
Obviously it says Droid DNA but you can see the image it is holding an HTC One perfectly.

http://www.monoprice.com/products/product.asp?c_id=108&cp_id=10833&cs_id=1083308&p_id=10258&seq=1&format=1#largeimage
[One (M7) Accessories] HYE_TECH:
Thanks for that. I really like the oem car dock but I'm not paying $60 for it especially with the way that I change devices lol...

$23 isn't bad and it does look like it'll do the job

Sent personally from the HTC one & only
[Defy General] gundisalvus:
I wonder if it is normal to listen to low volume and poor quality via BLUETOOTH? I use a Motorola S305 headset.

When using the factory stock rom, player volume 20-30% earpiece volume to 50%, is perfect listening.

Now with this rom, player volume to 60-70%, earpiece volume to 100%, you hear ugly, as with interference.

Is there any way to improve or fix this problem?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quisiera saber si es normal que se escuche con volumen tan bajo y mala calidad via BLUETOOTH? Uso un auricular Motorola S305.

Cuando usaba el rom stock de fábrica, volumen del reproductor al 20-30%, volumen del auricular al 50 %, se escuchaba perfecto.

Ahora con esta rom, volumen del reproductor al 60-70%, volumen del auricular al 100%, se escucha feo, como con interferencia.

Hay alguna forma de mejorar o arreglar este problema?
[General Topics] azizramly:
Hai all,

i have XDA so can i change my XDA battery? if yes how can i does it? and where can i buy a new battery? and can i change it without sending it to service centre.

Thank you
[General Topics] Biso007:
you have to be fully aware of the PIN assignment and the connectors diagram ... and excellent in soldering too :)
[General Topics] Rudegar:
http://www.pdasmart.com/pdaphone.htm

xda spareparts
[General Topics] r1kde:
I just removed the old battery and inseted a new one took about 3mins so easy. case will align the battery. I got mine from e-bay.
[HTC One X] acoustiq:
Hi guys,

I have a OneX from a friend and it seems to have a few bugs. I want to get it 100% stock and get all the updates.It runs on stock ROM now, but it was rooted, there were a bunch of crazy apps, a lot of trash, so I want to get it clean.

This is what I managed to find about it:

CID: HTC__032

HBoot says:

*** UNLOCKED ***
ENDEAVORU PVT SHIP S-ON RL
HBOOT-1.39.0000
CPLR-None
MICROP-None
RADIO-5.1204.162.29
eMMC-bootmode: disabled
CPU-bootmode: disabled
HW secure boot: enabled
MODEM PATH: OFF
Dec 17 2012, 13:59:37

Recovery: CWM based 6.0.2.7

Settings - About:

Android version 4.1.1
Sense 4+
Software number: 3.14.401.31
HTC SDK API level 4.63
HTCEXtension_Sense45_1

Kernel 3.1.10-g9fb8f80
root@abm030#1
SMP PREEMPT

Baseband 5.1204.162.29

Buid Number 3.14.401.31 CL128187 release-keys

Browser version Webkit 534.30

I know there are a few small OTA updates after this version, but if I get it to check for updates, it says there's nothing new. There's an update in the downloads dir - seems to ignore it. My guess is the software is messed up, so:

- I want to install the latest available JellyBean RUU

- Run all the available OTA updates

I've looked through htcdev.com/resources and http://www.androidfiles.org/ruu/?developer=Endeavor but it's a bit much for me :D

My only problem is that I don't know how to select the proper RUU for it. Please help with a link or something that can take me to the proper RUU.

I can handle the rest, but I really need your help in selecting the files.

Thank you in advance for any help / hints.

Cheers!
[HTC One X] matt95:
i need your main-version, type

fastboot getvar version-main
[HTC One X] acoustiq:
Here it is:

version-main: 3.14.401.31
[HTC One X] TToivanen:
All you have to do is download this: http://www.androidfiles.org/ruu/sec...Radio_5.1204.162.29_release_302015_signed.exe

Then relock the bootloader by typing 'fastboot oem lock' in fastboot.

While still in fastboot mode, run the ruu exe by right clicking and selecting 'run as administrator'

Sent from my IceCold One X
[HTC One X] acoustiq:
Thanks for the help guys, the RUU is installed.

However, I could only find a single, minor OTA update, for the Contacts app [about 1.2MB] and now it says there's nothing else available.

Any idea how recent that RUU is? I remember from my own HOX that there were about 3 or 4 updates after the JB upgrade.
[HTC One X] matt95:
if i am not wrong that is the 2nd JB update, i think you're missing the newer two
[HTC One X] acoustiq:
Is there anything I can do to get the latest updates?
[HTC One X] matt95:
have you tried rebooting the phone?
[HTC One X] acoustiq:
Yes, of course... No good.
[HTC One X] matt95:
try this

1- Go to Settings > Apps > All

2- Find Google Services Framework.

3- Force Stop.

4- Clear Data.

5- Check again the updates avaiable
[HTC One X] acoustiq:
I just did it, no change...

"Your phone is up to date..."

All I want is to make sure I get any future updates, nothing more. Otherwise I would've gone with a different ROM... Any other ideas?
[HTC One X] matt95:
finished my ideas :rolleyes:
[HTC One X] acoustiq:
Well, thank you for getting me this far, at least the phone is clean and works fine now :)

If anyone has any other ideas, I'm all ears :D.
[HTC One X] matt95:
no problems mate ;) i'll let you know if i have any other idea
[HTC One X] Mr Hofs:
My idea here :

Most HTC 032 cids did get the 3.18 update. But no 3.19 or 3.20 !

They pulled the 3.18 update because of the many WiFi problems that have been reported.

The 3.19 or 3.20 update is not released so that's why you don't get a update now anymore. :)

You are actually up to date now ;)
[HTC One X] matt95:
didn't know that ;)
[HTC One X] acoustiq:
I got the 3.20 update today... Sure took a while :rolleyes:
[HTC One X] Mr Hofs:
See ;)
[HTC One X] Verexa:
Problem finding RUU for 3.20.401.1

I have been looking for an RUU for 3.20.401.1, which I fear doesn't exist and only exists in OTA form.

I'm trying to return to the default HTC ROM and think that I require to do it through a clockworkmod backup, and flashing a boot.img and recovery.img.

The thing is will that 100% restore it back so that when I relock the bootloader it would load up correctly and allow me to recieve future OTA updates?
[HTC One X] gray_08j:
For give me if am at the wrong thread. Yesterday I received my new HTC ONE. coz I got tired of waiting for the latest OTA on JB. Same goes with the RUU for my HTC ONE S villec2. What happened was I accidentally bricked my phone but one guy here really helped me to a point to at least install the luxandroid rom. its working fine thanks to him.

Now, I just wanted to make sure before I do anything on my ONE in the future. I'd would like to make sure I can revert it back to the way it was before, not just by making a back but preventing the same thing to happen like on my One S.

Is there an Existing RUU for HTC ONE version-main: 3.62.401.1, CID HTC_J15, HBOOT 1.55.0000?

If there is. Can you guys direct me where I can get it. Your reply would be greatly appreciated mates.

Thanks in Advance. ;)
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] carosati3:
Does anyone know of an app that will hide a specific group message and then any reply to it? Trying to setup a surprise party for my wife and don't want to spoil it.
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] bx10r:
Hoping someone can help me with this....id like to make the attached pic into my wallpaper/lockscreen but just cant get it right. ifu see it looks a bit grainy. its the only pic i have so if anything else is needed then i guess i'll throw the idea out the window..any help is appreciated...THE BIKE IS MY MAIN CONCERN
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] jrosetto:
The resolution is to small on the picture. You need a new picture.
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] bx10r:
damn...oh well. Thanks...
[Xperia Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Irwan Fauzi:
hi guys..

i dont know what caused this problem.. well my device is a little hot, does overheating cause device to reboot? how to prevent my device from overheating? im on jokawildv3 249-1400 mhz, smartassv2, sio. please help guys.

EDIT: Solved

I send my play to sony and they said its not hardware issue, its the gold thing which connect between battery and phone. Sony already fix this and now im happy :eek:
[Xperia Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Bakisha:
Yes, most likely overclocing is reason for rebooting. Is it stable and cool (just worm, not hot) on stock speed?

In worst case, it is maybe battery's fault (which may degraded over time under hot enviroment)
[Xperia Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Irwan Fauzi:
i try everything i can, undervolt, underclock, buy new original battery but it still happen.
[Xperia Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Bakisha:
Make backup, flash stock rom. If it still happening, then maybe your Play's hardware is dieing...
[Xperia Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Irwan Fauzi:
will do..
[Xperia Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] chery2k:
Yes overheating does cause your device to reboot. The solution is to lower your frequency or overclock.
[Xperia Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] |SavageD|:
80% chance it is a dying hardware. Try going back to stock ROM and stay there. Don't install any kernels and overclocking stuff. If reboots still occurs....then sorry bro, time to move on. :crying:
[Xperia Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Irwan Fauzi:
Yea i think its hardware issue, i still didnt flash stock yet because i dont have laptop/pc atm. Maybe ill take my play to sony, the problem is its gonna take at least a month.. T.T
[Nook HD, HD+ General] TonyBigs:
It is noticed that while listening through headphones that the sound is being affected by some sort of 3D/spacial/EQ process that might give the impression of "punch" for movies but at the expense of phase-y sounding vocals and smeared high notes for music.
[Nook HD, HD+ General] rushless:
Yikes. Thst stuff is not good for music quality. No way to turn off? The settings options seems kind of scarce.
[Nook HD, HD+ General] TonyBigs:
After playing around with various music players and headphones it seems that the audio is now OK.

Not sure what happened. It may have been a headphone jack issue. Audio sounds great now.
[Nook HD, HD+ General] TonyBigs:
Oooops!

There is an issue with sound quality. Compared it to a Rockbox'ed Sandisk Clip Zip with a very wide stereo track 2-channel stereo track (fyi -- Brook Benton's "Kiddio" 1960). There is some EQ bast boost and high frequency crossfeed that narrows the stereo separation. I'm going to boot from CM and see if the problem persists.
[Nook HD, HD+ General] rushless:
For video I would not notice the issue, but could get to me listening to music with my Klipsch S4 buds.

Update:

It is not bad. Seems part of the issue is low gain which can be increased with Volume+ or other similar app function.

Volume+ did the trick for me. Jamming to some Coheed at the moment. Sounds as good as my other tablets now :)
[Nook HD, HD+ General] TonyBigs:
The problem was never with volume -- I think stock has plenty of volume for driving Audio Technica ATH-900x. The problem is with some sort of audio processing that affects the soundstage and frequency response.
[Nook HD, HD+ General] rushless:
I am not hearing it using the Google player app. Gain is not the same as volume. Both need to correlate or weak quality.
[Nook HD, HD+ General] TonyBigs:
SRS processing is used and applied at the headphone output. See HD+ file \system\etc\srs_processing.cfg
[Nook HD, HD+ General] cybertec69:
This is what I use, have my settings set to Jazz "my preference", audio sounds great, not talking about low resolution MP3's.

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.smartandroidapps.equalizer
[Nook HD, HD+ General] rushless:
I understand the config issue, but I am not hearing it. I should hear the sound manipulation with cymbal decay as example, but not hearing it. Weird.
[Nook HD, HD+ General] TonyBigs:
Playback in CM 10.1 has the correct stereo image.
[Nook HD, HD+ General] NookHD.w:
so am I

so am I ,after checking