yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S III I9305 (4G LTE + 2GB RAM) Q&A, Help & ] anguslaw:
Yes, faster but not noticeable.

Then you buy the bigger battery with 256 us dollars
[Galaxy S III I9305 (4G LTE + 2GB RAM) Q&A, Help & ] Glebun:
i9500 is not available in the US/UK, and it's better. I've explained why above
[Galaxy S III I9305 (4G LTE + 2GB RAM) Q&A, Help & ] kevindd992002:
Alright. Do both have LTE support though?
[Galaxy S III I9305 (4G LTE + 2GB RAM) Q&A, Help & ] Glebun:
yes AFAIK. A google search will tell you for sure
[Galaxy S III I9305 (4G LTE + 2GB RAM) Q&A, Help & ] kevindd992002:
Based on what I just read in another thread, the 9500 DOES NOT SUPPORT LTE. Only the 9505 does, so that's one thing to consider when choosing between the two.
[Galaxy S III I9305 (4G LTE + 2GB RAM) Q&A, Help & ] Glebun:
so yeah, as I said, should've googled it. It DOES support LTE

http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i9500_galaxy_s4-5125.php
[Galaxy S III I9305 (4G LTE + 2GB RAM) Q&A, Help & ] kevindd992002:
That information there is wrong. There are very many people in this forum that already confirmed that there are three variants of the S4. The GT-I9500, the GT-9505, and the SHV-E300S/K.

GT-I9500 - Exynos (Octa-core) CPU, no LTE support

GT-I9505 - Snapdragon 600 (Quad-core), with LTE support

SHV-E300S/K - Exynos (Octa-core) CPU, with LTE support

Here's a long thread on it for your reference: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2210169
[Galaxy S III I9305 (4G LTE + 2GB RAM) Q&A, Help & ] Glebun:
Watch the unveiling. CEO says that the i9500 DOES support LTE
[Galaxy S III I9305 (4G LTE + 2GB RAM) Q&A, Help & ] kevindd992002:
I don't understand? Some people already have the 9500 and 9505 and they can confirm that the 9500 doesn't have the LTE modem. Am I missing something here?
[Galaxy S III I9305 (4G LTE + 2GB RAM) Q&A, Help & ] Glebun:
yeah, apparently, it doesn't. which is really weird
[Galaxy S III I9305 (4G LTE + 2GB RAM) Q&A, Help & ] GR0S:
i9505, at least new games will be qualcomm optimized, also Cyanogen will run better on i9505
[Galaxy S III I9305 (4G LTE + 2GB RAM) Q&A, Help & ] kevindd992002:
This is not uncommon for Samsung. I was expecting something like this. I'm glad we agreed on this finally, lol.
[Galaxy S III I9305 (4G LTE + 2GB RAM) Q&A, Help & ] Glebun:
it's weird because I remember the CEO saying that it will support LTE
[Galaxy S III I9305 (4G LTE + 2GB RAM) Q&A, Help & ] anguslaw:
The CEO said that the Exynos (Octa-core) CPU supports LTE, he didn't say the phone GT-I9500 have LTE. Please do not mislead people.

The CEO just wanted to clarify that their EXYNOS cpu has the ability to support LTE, he didn't say they have enable the LTE ability in GT-I9500.

The CEO also said that both cpu of I9500 and I9505 have pretty much the same performance to general users. So, end of the story, no need to think too much which performs better.

Just decide depending on Lte or 3G.

They have both version because in some place on earth, LTE network is not developed yet ( such as India) , there is no need to have LTE device there now or in a foreseeable future.

But in Hong Kong, the LTE network is well developed, so, people in Hong Kong , etc, will most likely want a LTE phone . Therefore, if the LTE network is developing in your area or will developed in the near future and you will be using this phone for around 2 years, you probably want a LTE version.
[Galaxy S III I9305 (4G LTE + 2GB RAM) Q&A, Help & ] kevindd992002:
I couldn't agree more. I forgot to mention earlier about the Exynos CPU being able to "support" LTE but the actual 9500 doesn't have an LTE modem on it.
[Galaxy S III I9305 (4G LTE + 2GB RAM) Q&A, Help & ] r.dalangin:
Been thinking of the same thing

The thing is, will the i9305 work with HSPA+ if it can't get and lte signal, or will it revert to old fashioned 3g? I also have the i9300 and was thinking of getting the lte version, because i am after the 2GB of RAM. Everything else in the s3 is perfect for me and im not thinking of upgrading to the S4.:good:
[Galaxy S III I9305 (4G LTE + 2GB RAM) Q&A, Help & ] kevindd992002:
Yes, of course it will revert to 3G/3.5G if it doesn't get an LTE signal.
[Galaxy S III I9305 (4G LTE + 2GB RAM) Q&A, Help & ] kevindd992002:
If I decide in updating to the LTE version of the S3, would the i9305 be the best choice among all the other variants?

Thanks.
[Galaxy S III I9305 (4G LTE + 2GB RAM) Q&A, Help & ] drop_by:
I'd say I9305 would be the best S3 variant to get
[Galaxy S III I9305 (4G LTE + 2GB RAM) Q&A, Help & ] kevindd992002:
But we were talking about in another thread that it isn't "natively" compatible with Globe's LTE?
[Galaxy S III I9305 (4G LTE + 2GB RAM) Q&A, Help & ] omair.shabir:
You need to check the frequency that is used by globe for thier lte network and see if the i9305 supports that
[Galaxy S III I9305 (4G LTE + 2GB RAM) Q&A, Help & ] kevindd992002:
I am 101% sure that the i9305 supports Globe's LTE frequency, that is a very basic thing to look for. My concern here is that there are reports that the i9305 still doesn't work with Globe's LTE because there is no official i9305 firmware for the Philippines.
[Motorola Atrix HD] achmedkb01:
Anyone having email issues with pac rom v22 on AHD?
[Motorola Atrix HD] Byakko Custom:
How and what recovery did you use to flash the rom?
[Motorola Atrix HD] achmedkb01:
I used epinters cwm with the flash tool, mounted sys, flashed rom and gapps whipped caches and factory reset....it was working fine last night but today has been acting up....
[Motorola Atrix HD] achmedkb01:
ANYONE

ANYONE
[Motorola Atrix HD] achmedkb01:
Email issue

Still having the same issue
[Motorola Atrix HD] deeje00:
Try the newest one..

Sent from my PACMAN MATRIX HD MAXX
[Motorola Atrix HD] Byakko Custom:
If needed, just update to the new CWM,

Get the latest nightly,

Then flash like normal;

Factory Reset, Format /System, Flash ROM+gapps+whateverelseyouflash, Wipe Cache & Dalvik, Reboot.

If you have problems with PA Preferences after booting into the ROM, flash the Paranoid-Fix in the OP's post.

That should (hopefully) solve your problems.
[Kindle Fire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] akazim96:
OK as Far as I was concerned, I had rooted my Kindle, and I had installed TWRP and FFF

but then it didnt

so I tried reinstalling them both. Even thought he tool said I installed TWRP it wouldnt work, howver I Tried installing FFF again and this time my kindle wouldnt boot up it just stays at the normal "Kindle Fire" boot up screen

I have tried all the Unbrick Utilities and nothing is working.

The kindle turns on and stays for ever and ever INfinity on the boot up screen

Any Help would be greatly appreciated.

Akazim96
[Kindle Fire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] soupmagnet:
Start with getting a factory cable.
[Kindle Fire Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] akazim96:
Unbrick

So if I get a factory cable I should be able to unbrick it?
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] CheesyNutz:
http://www.droid-life.com/2013/04/2...-against-htc-one-over-duplicated-microphones/

As if the HTC One hasn’t seen enough setbacks already before its launch, a new court ruling against HTC in the Netherlands looks to make it even worse. Nokia has been awarded a preliminary injunction against the HTC One centering around high-amplitude microphones that are found in the phone. The microphones found inside the One are the exact same as the mics found in the Lumia 720, and that is no good for HTC.

The same company makes the microphones for HTC and Nokia, but Nokia says that the components of these mics in particular were made specifically for Nokia. While this could be a mistake on HTC’s part, it could have been the fault of the microphone manufacturer in this case. In the meantime the One is facing more setbacks.

HTC says they are “disappointed” in the decision from the court and that they will “explore alternate solutions immediately.”

Existing phones using the components face no sales ban

Dutch courts find HTC 'blameless' in Nokia's microphone dispute, but sales of offending parts halted for six months

The full details have emerged about yesterday's actions in the Netherlands, where a court was said to have handed down a preliminary injunction against the HTC one on behalf of Nokia. According to the district court filing, the courts have imposed a 10-month ban on ST Microelectronics selling any of the dual-membrane microphone pieces that were designed and co-developed by Nokia. Apparently, some miscommunication led ST Micro to believe that the exclusivity agreement for Nokia was only six months, when it was actually 12. As a penalty the terms were extended a further six months, during which time ST Micro is not allowed to sell the parts to anyone other than Nokia.

We don't make this up, we just report it.

The courts found HTC "blameless", as they could not know the details of a confidential agreement between Nokia and ST Micro, and they face no penalties. Nor are their products banned in the Netherlands or anywhere else. They will not be allowed to source the components from ST Micro for six months, though -- which could easily lead to supply issues and expensive re-engineering for future HTC One shipments. HTC has issued a statement saying in part that they "do not expect this decision to have any immediate impact on our handset sales." But they certainly can't be happy.
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] BarryH_GEG:
Vendors like Nokia have third parties like STMicroelectronics build components using their designs and specs all the time. That doesn't give the third party license to reuse or resell what they received from a vendor when the component in question was "exclusive." If it wasn't clearly exclusive Nokia wouldn't have been granted an injuction in less than a week. But HTC's to blame too. Their legal department should have screened every component used in the one to make sure it wasn't violating another company's patent or designs. Since the part is an HTC device they bear the responsibility but will most likely go after STM for the damages they suffer. Assuming STM's big enough to absorb them.
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] ryude:
HTC just can't catch a break. I like their phones though.
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] SirSigma:
I felt kind of mixed over this when I heard about it considering I own both phones.
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] nugzo:
This might be the end of HTC. They were counting on the ONE to help them out.. It wont if its banned!! I just dont think they can afford to keep up after this. Very sad because i love HTC phones.
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] californiarailroader:
Nobody is going to "ban" HTC, it's the part in question that is the issue, and I'm sure it'll get worked out. Nokia is still trying to make a comeback themselves, they can hardly afford to get in a fight.
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] Hunt3r.j2:
It's pretty much guaranteed that STM was breaching contract when they decided to do this. HTC is at fault for trusting suppliers to follow the law and honor contracts, so I guess it's time to try and preach jeremiads of how HTC is going to go bankrupt.
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] gunnyman:
The Apple injunction didn't end them last year, but yeah HTC is becoming the betamax of Android, while Samsung is VHS. (You won't understand this if you're not old like me)

---------- Post added at 07:17 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:16 AM ----------

Nokia has patents, that's the only thing keeping them from going under.

If Nokia had gone with Android instead of Windows phone they'd be on top again.
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] nugzo:
Im not talking about banning HTC, talking about banning the ONE. Kind of like how apple tried to ban the One X. The difference is Nokia is right here...They have a great case!!..i think they would win in a fight against struggling HTC. Dont get me wrong.. I love HTC and wish them all the luck. Hopefully it's not their fault and its the mic manufacturers fault.. Either way this hurts HTC very badly!! I dont know what i'd do if i had to switch manufacturers..I guess i can hope that Google shows up with an awesome Motorola device!!
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] raqball:
Do you have some insider knowledge that lets you know they have a great case?

The One won't get banned. HTC and Nokia will work out a licensing deal if it's needed..

Love how stuff like this always get blown way out of proportion..
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] gunnyman:
I'm not worried about a ban, but any more delays getting this phone to market can only hurt a company that's already in a precarious situation.
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] UMGixxer:
I wonder how this will affect the release of the black version.
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] BarryH_GEG:
The only reason there wasn't a ban in the EU is because Nokia's mic technology is only patented in the U.S. I'm sure Nokia's already filing with the ITC seeking both an importation ban and stop-sale on the One.

This is from the international forum...

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2246517&page=5

In a normal world issues like this wouldn't happen. Upon finding that STM (assumingly inadvertently) offered their technology to another company, Nokia would just say "OK, pay me $X as a license fee per unit and we'll call it good." But just like Apple vs. Samsung, it isn't about money it's about inflicting pain and damage on your competitors. As Hamdir pointed out, HTC and Nokia have a blood feud going because of HTC's entry in the Windows Mobile world which was Nokia's turf. Nokia's going to use the STM issue to inflict as much pain as they can on HTC (via STM). And unlike some of these tussles which are ambiguous this one's pretty black and white. So I'd guess any type of settlement is unlikely and that HTC will have to come up with another microphone to use.

And since the mic technology is patented in the U.S. there’s no doubt Nokia will file for an emergency injunction against HTC with the ITC seeking to bar the importation of the One. In U.S. law there’s a saying “ignorantia legis neminem excusat.” Translated from Latin it’s “ignorance of the law excuses no one.” HTC’s legal department should have verified well in advance that any of the components (theirs or third parties) used in the One didn’t violate any patents or use agreements. So the fact that STM sold them Nokia’s technology won’t allow HTC to claim “victim” status; at least not in the U.S. As someone said earlier, HTC’s contract with STM will hold STM responsible for the impact of this issue but it won’t prevent the ITC from taking action against HTC for using the offending part.

Changing out the mic isn’t as simple as it sounds though. The good news is that the mic chip isn't on the motherboard; it's on the daughter board which minimizes the reengineering work. But HTC's going to have design a new daughter board to accommodate the new mic and then modify all the s/w to account for the change in performance characteristics. A new daughter board may require FCC and CE re-certification. HTC's assembles their phones but components like the mother and daughter board arrive pre-assembled from someone else. So HTC's got to find a new mic, work with a partner to redesign the daughter board, get it in to production, and possibly have to have it re-certified. It's not a fast or trivial exercise.
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] CheesyNutz:
updated OP with more
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] BarryH_GEG:
This is a translation of the actual court order. STM can't sell the mics to anyone but Nokia until March 2014 or until an existing arbitration case that's being heard in Finland (Nokia's home town) decides otherwise. And the difference between the finding in the EU and whatever happens in the U.S. is that the technology used in the mic is patented by Nokia here. The ITC (not the courts) will decide whether to issue a non-importation order and/or a stop-sale. They are the same body that halted the One X in the U.S. when Apple filed a complaint over the use of the app-picker s/w patent. Dealing with a patent violation is different than dealing with an exclusivity agreement and whether HTC knew or didn't know that what STM provided was patented by someone else won't leave them "blameless" in the eyes of the patent tribunal.

One factor that HTC (or other customers) can not be that they receive a product that ST towards them was them that contractually obliged not (yet) provide known. They are therefore not acted unlawfully against Nokia in ST Tufnell microphones to buy. Therefore - now an absolute right of Nokia is missing - no legal presence which ST could base to return of the Tufnell delivered enforce microphones themselves against HTC (or other customers). Under those circumstances, a recall no appropriate form of compensation. 4.10. The advanced penalty will be maximized. 4.11. ST will be largely if convicted. Unsuccessful party in the proceedings The costs on the part of Nokia are estimated at: - summons EUR 104,00 - 589,00 registry - attorney fees 816.00 Total 1509.00 EUR 5. The decision The court 5.1. ST commands to stop after the service of this judgment immediately the supply of dual-diaphragm Microphones (Tufnell) to any person other than Nokia and keep up to March 1, 2014 or until the arbitration between the parties in Helsinki discontinued otherwise decided, 5.2. condemns ST to Nokia to pay EUR 50,000.00 for each "Tufnell" double diaphragm microphone despite the above under 5.1 a penalty payment. command specified in the said period to another than Nokia comes up to a maximum of EUR 1,000,000.00 is reached 5.3. ST condemns the proceedings, on the part of Nokia to date estimated at EUR 1,509.00, 5.4. declares this judgment provisionally enforceable, 5.5. the more points otherwise requested. This judgment was delivered by Mr. RHC Jongeneel, judge, assisted by PJ van Vliet, Registrar, and the public on April 22, 2013.​

http://zoeken.rechtspraak.nl/detailpage.aspx?ljn=BZ8278
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Asif79:
Hi, wondering if anyone can help.

I was running my note 2 n7100 on Omega rom v15 with perseus kernal v35. It was fine, until yesterday my phone started rebooting.

I reflashed Omega rom, I unrooted and reflashed stock rom, I rooted and tried other roms.. however, im still having problems.

Once the phone has restarted and got to home screen, whenever I do anything, the phone reboots. (on Cm10.1 rom varients - jellybam and pa3.5)

When using stock rom and omega rom the phone doesn't even go past the samsung galaxy note II logo screen.

I've read somewhere, that reflashing the bootloader may help, so I may give that a try..

Does anyone else have any ideas or similar problems?
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Primokorn:
Hi

Never had this issue but if I were you, I think I'll do all Wipe & format options from my recovery and then I'll flash a Factory firmware via Odin.
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] UtkarshGupta:
He did that.

Could be A hardware issue.
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Primokorn:
Flashing a stock rom isn't a clean installation so this is not what I suggested.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] ddiehl:
I need to edit the tags on some MP3 files on my GS3. I've tried Tag & Rename, but it doesn't recognize the device when connected via USB.

Can someone point me to a good desktop app for editing MP3's on my phone via USB connection. I know there are some apps that can do this, but I have quite a few and doing it on the phone can be a strain. I would also like to avoid offloading all the files from the phone- editing them- and reloading them..

Thanks..
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] pipergca:
I use MP3 Tag Editor. It's free and the best I've used. Google it

Edit: Here is the website: http://www.mp3tag.de/en/
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] ddiehl:
No go.. It sees songs on the computer just fine but not on the device..

Thanks anyway..
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] sideslippy:
This app (DroID3Tagger) isn't a desktop app but a Play Store app that tags your music automatically, I've used it a few times and can say it will tag most songs accurately but does take a while to complete. It'd be easy to leave it tagging music files overnight.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] malikfaraj96:
you could try these apps. iTag and MP3dit (both in playstore). iTag helps you find album art as well
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] hednik:
Doesn't poweramp allow you to do this ?
[HTC One S] Little K:
Can someone pull the myanmar font and the myanmar keyboard that come along with the htc butterfly? Because i wanna use that on my one s (s3).
[HTC One S] enigma19932:
hey fri,khin myar khu bl Rom use nay tr lae kwa?? Stock pae lar?? ngar ka tot custom change mi loz tie pet nay p ...stock lae pyan change loz ma ya ..hboot lae update lote ma ya net!!! And HTC ONE S S3 kg kg pyin ng tet shop thi yin pyaw pr ohn kwr
[HTC One S] Little K:
You shoulda check my other posts. And it's too easy to roll back to stock rom. You only need the stock rom from S3 roms thread and flash it via cwm or twrp. After that you need to flash the boot.img for the rom. Now you can enjoy the stock sense rom. There are many roms for htc one s s3 from 4.0.3 to 4.1.1. Find and flash it. If my advice is helpful, hit the thank button.
[HTC One S] enigma19932:
It's not that easy bro,if so I' d do that by myself..My hboot is 2.09 and can' t install any Rom I wish!Also if I go back to stock I had to flash a RUU through ruu OEM not from TWRP...Just so u know..My cid is 044 and if u have a matched ruu,help me ...my gmail is enigma charon@gmail.com
[HTC One S] ryanshew:
Hboot does not matter if you are just flashing a ROM zip through twrp. Any available in the dev section for your phone will work, stock or tweaked...or if you made a nandroid of your stock ROM you can just restore it to go back. Just make sure you fastboot flash the boot.img for the Android version you plan to install.

HTC_One_S | S-OFF | DeviantXone_2.0 | Twisted_III
[HTC One S] enigma19932:
Seem u r on S4 version..But I'm on S3 and my phone is s-off also there's no solution for S3 to s-off yet.You are right about flashing ,I can flash every rom but I can't boot it coz of my low hboot version..So there's only 4.0.3 roms for me I can use with my hboot. No way to use jb roms or 4.0.4 without updating Hboot through OTA or RUU....:D
[HTC One S] ryanshew:
Hboot shouldn't matter. Are you sure you are flashing the rom's boot.img through fastboot?

I've never heard that before, but then again I've never really payed attention to that model. What about the cm rooms that are coming out for it?

HTC_One_S | S-OFF | DeviantXone_2.0 | Twisted_III
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Accessories] Mikkel:
Hi there

Today, I received my iMate. This is a really really nice device with enough CPU power and memory for som serious use.

I have been doing a little bit of research regarding how to use this device with GPS navigation software.

Here is my ideal situation:

I would like to be able to use my iMate in my car with a bluetooth GPS receiver and with a Jabra BT200 headset.

Will these two types of BT connection co-exist? Will I be able to receive calls while the BT GPS is in use? (I'm running the latest iMate ROM)

I heard somewhere that Pharos' GPS software can take advantage of the device being a PPC Phone and receive traffic updates and automatically reroute you around accidents, congestion etc.

IS there any of you out there who have tried any of these things with the iMate / XDAII ?

Thanks all :-)

/Mikkel
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Accessories] Victor:
Yeah you can use both at the same time. Dunno about the traffic updates, as I live in Seattle where I get them via the web.

You should have no problems with your desired Bluetooth phone and bluetooth gps working at the same time.

Make sure download the bluetooth tools from the german site, to make things easier....
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Accessories] jvn:
i-mate & Pharos BT GPS

Hi - I have just purchased the Pharos BT GPS and software but I can not get the BT to connect.

I have installed ver 1.1 of the German Bluetooth Tools.

My i-mate "sees" the GPS and it accepts the pairing code.

The blue light on the GPS flickers rather than blinks.

When I pair the GPS the light goes fairly steady for about 5 seconds and then starts flashing (flickering) again.

Any ideas out there?