yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[HTC Sensation] adrielcal1:
hi everyone!

i'm currently on cyanogenmod nightly version from march 10th 2013. everything works fine. awesome battery life. very fast and 'smooth' :good:

so around april 5th, i saw the nightly that was released the night before (april 4th) and i updated it to that and to my concern, the wifi didnt work anymore on that build. i was devastated and i had to go back to the march 10th build. so now i'm checking the cyanogenmod website, and i see there is a new build dated april 14th 2013. has anyone tried it? if yes, does everything work? if yes, how is it different from the older builds? thanks :D
[HTC Sensation] DennisBold:
I've been going back and forth between CM Nightlies and MIUI (heavily addicted to the themes).

Latest CM Nightly I flashed was released on the 7th. Everything is relatively stable, and most everything works. A few changes in the new release; you can check here:

http://changelog.bbqdroid.org/#pyramid/cm10/1365977090
[HTC Sensation] adrielcal1:
thank you!

thanks, DennisBold! the link was very helpful. :good: &i concur with you, the CM themes are very addicting and look really cool. will try the update OTA :fingers-crossed: good day to you!
[HTC Sensation] kaihou:
i have trying this ROM, really2 smooth.. love itt, but this is really official from cm10 ? :confused:
[HTC Sensation] DennisBold:
If you downloaded the ROM from here:

http://get.cm/?device=pyramid

Then yes, it's an official CM10 ROM.
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mmk080:
Hi all,

I have a question regarding the AT&T HTC One pre-installed apps by AT&T. Is it true that AT&T pre-install a contacts app that takes over HTC's contact default app? Also, does AT&T DRIVE MODE replace HTC Car mode (if so, I will be so pissed). What default HTC apps that are no longer accessible in AT&T's HTC One?

Thanks all in advance.
[General Topics] Luk4S:
Hi all I'm new and I have two questions :)

Is the ETEN P300 an XDA?

And the other question... it's not related to XDA but... I found a cheap ipaq 3870 (language italian), I know it is possible to upgrade it to wm2003... where can i find the rom and instructions to flash it on a non-eng device?

Luk4S
[General Topics] Rudegar:
1

no all xda1's look alike

and all xda2's look alike

and enten dont look anything like them

http://www.ppcw.net/index.php?itemid=1682

as far as i know then it's not made by htc

2

http://xdaforums.com/viewtopic.php?t=4428
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] omarabdelaal:
So I preordered the HTC One at my store on April 5th, because they told me I would be getting the phone on Tuesday or Wednesday. Now I got the tracking number and it says its scheduled for April 22!! The phone comes in stores on April 19,, This sucks.. :(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(

In Transit: On Time

Business

Day(s) Left4

Scheduled Delivery:

Monday, 04/22/2013, By End of Day

Last Location:

Arrived - DFW Airport, TX, United States, Tuesday, 04/16/2013

Additional Information

Shipped/Billed On:04/16/2013

Type:Package

Weight:2.00 lbs

Shipment Progress

Location	Date	Local Time Activity

DFW Airport, TX, United States	04/16/2013	3:43 P.M.	Arrival Scan

Fort Worth, TX, United States	04/16/2013	3:27 P.M.

Departure Scan 04/16/2013	12:59 P.M.	Origin Scan

United States	04/16/2013	3:29 P.M.	Order Processed: Ready for UPS
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] xXxG0dzRAgexXx:
That really does suck. Guess they didn't specify which Tuesday it woulda been. :p Hope this doesn't happen to be. ;_; I'm sorry man.
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] omarabdelaal:
Actually they told me the 16th or 17th
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] xXxG0dzRAgexXx:
Haha yeah was just joking. :p I have a feeling since I just pre ordered yesterday that I won't be getting it Friday. :c I was just gonna buy one in stores till I found out the 64gb was only online. Preordered right away after that. Woulda been nice to see that earlier. Text was just so small didnt see that till someone mentioned it here. Some are saying the 64 is on back order. Guess the upside would be that is definitely get a phone made in April but I want the phone ASAP.
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] omarabdelaal:
Ya Im reallllllly excited for this phone.. I have been wanting it since the rumors in March, then HTC kept delaying it so Im very excited..:p
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] CheesyNutz:
who post here why no call them and complain ?
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] omarabdelaal:
I already called the store, the customer care, and ups and they all said I cant do anything about it
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] fkinrawr:
mine is still stuck at the DFW airport ): LOL why do in store orders always get shafted.
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] Irish Enigma:
I just got mine via FedEX and just got finished setting it up, its worth the wait!!!

AS OF RIGHT NOW HTC DEV STILL WORKS
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] SysAdmNj:
Let this be a lesson to you all :D

I already went through this with at&t before so I never pre-order now. I dont care what they offer for free. Well, maybe...
[AT&T HTC One (M7)] PPPeterP8nts:
Got mine yesterday and I've been having fun evict since. Did the order online thru the premier site and didn't get the media link. I font really care cause I watch movies on my TV not my phone
[Motorola Atrix HD] penser:
I know SS3 uses TWRP and Rom Manager uses CWM, but what are the real differences? Is there a reason I should use CWM/Rom Manager instead of SS3? I've been using SS3 and it's worked fine for all the roms I've tried (all but Batakang Rises so far).
[Motorola Atrix HD] Youngunn2008:
OK. Safe strap is an awful way to be able to trick a phone with a locked boot loader into allowing flashing a ROM. Twrp just happens to be what they based it on. Its better than nothing.

Cwm, ahhhhhh now were talking. A real recovery that will let you do anything, to go along with our fully unlocked bootloader.

Cwm rocks, I guess would be the one point to take away from this.

Next, I'll show you how eye contact can make or break any business meeting.
[Motorola Atrix HD] Chronoswing:
SS3 is for locked bootloaders.

CWM is for unlocked bootloaders.

It's as simple as that.

Using SS3 on an unlocked bootloader is a waste of time.
[Motorola Atrix HD] penser:
SS3 seems to be better for me right now, because I can't figure out how to flash Gapps with a rom with a 1 zip flash limit.
[Motorola Atrix HD] deeje00:
You do them 1 at a time man. It's not complicated lol. It's how everyone does it.

Sent from my JokerMATRIX HD MAXX
[Samsung Captivate Glide] bubalashkka:
is there any way to do it? the anoying T-mobile text is just there and taking up my notifications bar, and my lockscreen id like to change it to mabey something cool,ive tried the carrier name change APP, tried to find the eri xml but no luck, if it has to result in recompiling the framework,res.apk has anyone successfully done it?
[Samsung Captivate Glide] yohan4ws:
This is so in the wrong forum , can a mod please move this to Genera l ? (bubal I know that you're looking for an appearance mod but changing framework definitely goes beyond this forum grouping :))
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] Logix:
has anyone else noticed that google has been removing really useful apps

all host manager related software has been banned

adaway

ad free android all gone...

and

wifi kill got X_X killed which is a totally useful program

network spoofer

and im afraid set dns will be last

totally not cool...

fu google thats some total apple ****e
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] shane6374:
Yup, it happened about two weeks ago. Google doesn't want anyone trying to block ads I guess.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] Logix:
thats cuz ads for them and all their creepy friends= money

they dont give a **** about the legit uses for a host file editor

such a shame

ah anyway thats how the cookie and empires crumble
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] Slomodrop:
LOL. I suppose I could come up with a legitimate use if I thought long enough.

// Galaxy SIII SPH-L710 // MC3 // KT747 ktoonservative-BFQ 384-1728Mhz + TK Mod + rescaling // MOAR // entropy + DNS + blocking // fsTRIM // sent from xda premium
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] youkosnake:
Most app developers make their revenue via ads. On a side note, one of the terms for developers to sign for Google Glass is they can't have ads or charge fee for their apps.

Sent straight outta Compton
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] -EViL-KoNCEPTz-:
No they were removed because they violate the part of the play store developer t&c about accessing and modifying server connections by rerouting the ad links thru a sandbox. Basically they could be used for nefarious purposes and Google doesn't want to be held liable.

☆SoA: Son's of Android™☆

I like to break stuff! :D
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] miller710:
They are still on the Amazon appstore

Here is a list of more removed apps.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1425813

Sent from my blue galaxy
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] -EViL-KoNCEPTz-:
I know where to get them, Google pulled them from THEIR play store they didn't ban them. They violate the play store T&C because of the risk of inappropriate uses that Google doesn't want to risk being liable for. Plain and simple. Googles store Googles rules. Amazon owns their app store and amazon has all kinds of spyware infested garbage apps on there. Hell amazon pushes spyware as the FAOTD, FFS. :rolleyes:

☆SoA: Son's of Android™☆

I like to break stuff! :D
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] KennyG123:
This is called paying the bills. If all of Google's advertisers ask to have them removed who do you think they are going to listen to? Us or them?
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] HoundDog24:
I hope they don't turn the Play Store into the "I" Store. At least there are other places to get apps.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] -EViL-KoNCEPTz-:
It actually had nothing to do with blocking the ads, but the way they actually block them. They modify or access 3rd party servers, rerouting ad links to the sandbox, which is a violation of the developer T&C for the play store. The reasoning is actually fairly logical and entirely fair on Googles part. The way the apps work, they could be used to reroute private data to someone's server where they can datamine you for personal info and steal your identity. Google doesn't want to be held liable should that happen. So I can understand the section of the T&C and I would agree that the way the adblockers function does in fact violate that section of the T&C which the developers agreed to to be able to distribute their apps via Googles service.

☆SoA: Son's of Android™☆

I like to break stuff! :D
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] KennyG123:
I was not aware of that. Thanks.

Friendly Neighborhood Moderator
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] -EViL-KoNCEPTz-:
I wasn't either until I read Googles explanation. They clearly and concisely pointed out the specific section(s) of the developer T&C and explained how and why the apps violated it. Learned something new, and after their explanation it made perfect sense, to me at least. They even said they weren't banning the apps just removing them from the play store for the violations and they understand why people would use them, and pointed out there were other places to get them, linked to adblocks site specifically. They just don't want to be held liable should a developer choose to masquerade a malicious app as an adblocker and steal peoples personal information.

Edit: and it's not just adblocking apps, any app that specifically interferes with a 3rd party server will be removed, the adblockers are just the most obvious ones that do this which makes them the easiest to start off cleaning up.

☆SoA: Son's of Android™☆

I like to break stuff! :D
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] Frostacious:
Ad away http://db.tt/RNHmzDrv

Adblockplus http://db.tt/IGTkVOkH

Adfree http://db.tt/Oa72cZXx
[Captivate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Jester6193:
Usually after a reset, most of the settings get applied. This is not happening for zRam and purging of assets under the development settings.... Is there a trick to get them to save the settings? It states next to the setting that a reboot is required, but turns it back off after the reboot. I'm at a loss.

Also, I had another post about my google voice typing on the keyboard not working, while voice search does work. When I touch it, it just does nothing besides light up.

Is everyone having problems like this? should I just give in and reflash?

I am using Captivating V6 Rom with unofficial sephamore kernal. I flashed from stock

Thanks for any help or suggestions.
[Captivate Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Val D.:
I had recently the same issue and it turns out to be ROM related. Same kernel, same settings, but different result after reboot. And leave zRam disabled for better performance.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] kekko986:
I want to share with you and develop a method to really save the battery..and i want to do an experiment to improve the battery life! I've tried everything ... with a minimum of room for improvement..cpu-cut...undervolt...underclock..freezing apps...turning off mobile data automatically..black/dark themes..etc..but! I think the main problem is the display and not the cpu & co ..from now I shall deal on here..let's study! consumption is above of each average , and of each system process .. or application..what the hell!?well..below my setting and my thoughts

Rom_

CyanogenMod 10.1 M3 (tired of day-by-day-updating ?)

Kernel_

Ak.diamond.099 (of course)

Theme_

Black exodus

Kernel manager app_

Trickster MOD ( I bought in the past Franco's and GlaDOS's app too..but Trickster seems more complete, universal, simple and immediate )

Tweaks and Settings_

Greenify to hibernate all apps which aren't of messaging and / or services

PGM nexus to not to abuse physical buttons

SuperBeam for sharing easy with NFC/QRcode

Phorganizer? for albums and update-media-trigger

Nova launcher Prime THE launcher

RoundR for trash look?

Deep settings - Kernel_

Cubic (as preset)

Row 512 (as preset)

Color and all the rest, as preset

Multicore Power Savings : 2

Min 180000

Max 1060000

MaxScreenOff 180000

MinScreenOn 180000

Governover Hyper (i usually choose Interactive..but let's trying new things!?✌)

SmartReflex_ (credits to nephilim from who I took inspiration !)

Core 800

Iva 800

Mpu 800

Voltage offset_

Mpu -75 (trying now..switching from -50 offset)

( i will try to undervolt all the rest )

but I think the trick for a good battery life is in the auto-brightness settings of the fu**ing awesome display.. just look at the battery stats..i think we have to halve (1/2) the 'light' in the daily use.. also because .. always seeing the statistics .. the rest consumes very little, thanks to the continuous optimization and a little undervolting too.

Deep settings - Auto brightness_

Thanks to CM10.1 we can adjust the levels of automatic brightness : the higher level (>8867 lux) will be set to 50%.. lower levels will be scaled by 2-3 percentage points

Thanks to CyanogenMod for his attractive livery and Anarkia1976 for his awesome engine!

This is my settings for tomorrow..YEEAH?, good night SoCs! ?

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus con Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] oubeichen:
what about screen on time?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] kekko986:
Sorry... I have forgot it!

It is about 2.30h as u can see...this before the exp.

Light levels are 'stock' as cm10.1 says..in the screens you can see the result of UV UC Greenify etcetc optimization... Next hours i will post screenshots for battery stats,details and screen on time after battery-life-cycle using low % of automatoc brightness levels.

I hope to reduce display stats from 60% to 40%...why not 30%! I'm on stock 1750mAh battery pack...and I am a slave of the power sockets to insert the charger...6 hours are a little few..

Stay tuned!

Edit. I forgot the screens:rolleyes:

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus con Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] kekko986:
After about five hours i have 50% of battery..with 62% of display consumption.. 1.15 hours screen on time...

how do you consume so little about display?

which settings to use?:confused:

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus con Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Mach3.2:
CM10.1 sucks battery like no body's business, try PA someday and see if it increases the screen on time.

Almost hit 4 hours the other day..
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] kekko986:
I used PA for a long time ... I switched to CM when it is output from the M3 ... so little .. and tell you that I feel less consumption of CM .... Then again, maybe I'm wrong, but I think that the consumption of the display nn is related to the ROM ... or at least I hope so! maybe i will do a test ..

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus con Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] WayTooGosu:
That's my battery life.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] kekko986:
Wow! Which rom/kernel do you use? You apply some tricks like change light levels or you are on 'stock' settings?

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus con Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Mach3.2:
You charged your battery in between, it's inaccurate..
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] kekko986:
yes, I noticed ... the value of time is not accurate, but you get the idea... is a statistic best of my..for sure...

Which is your setting march3.2?

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus con Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Mach3.2:
I average around 3 hours screen on time on Domination(mixture of features from PA, CM10.1, AOKP).

ran PA for about a day and hit 4 hours.

Used to average out at 4h30minutes on CM10 using the 2050mAh battery.

I only slightly underclock the voltage for the CPU, nothing else.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] kekko986:
With auto brightness?

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus con Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] andQlimax:
I always get 14 hours battery, 4 h screen on, WiFi always on

Stock rom, stock battery, stock auto brightness

Everything depends from how you use the phone, not from kernels, roms, or undervolt..my opinion

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus con Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Mach3.2:
yes
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] kekko986:
I get 6 hours with 2.30 screen on time..

is a right conclusion with which I agree ... I admit that I use a smartphone fast .. but there is one thing that i can not understand ... Why the same display can drain your battery in a different way, with the difference of a couple of hours? not everyone should have a consumption of 4 hours of screen on time? ( approximately)

if we put two galaxy nexus with active screen always .. no auto shut-off ... mine and yours ... we probably would have the same consumption statistics about the display?:confused:

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus con Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] andQlimax:
the hardware display should consume about the same for everyone, if you with a full charged battery get 2.30 screen on time, it means that the rest of the battery has been "drained" by the cpu..maybe you did high intensive cpu tasks, like play 3d games, or browsing a lot with chrome or other heavy apps

when I get 4 hours screen on time, its because I mainly used my phone for whatsapp, gmail gplus
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] kekko986:
My only use is messaging with chaton and surfing internet with android stock browser...no playing games..few calls...sometimes apollo for playing music..(no often..)

I use my phone as a netbook..i read android news on favourite website, and tapatalk for xda.. No more...i have little percentage of CPU/APPS/SYSTEM consumption and about 65% of display...as you can see on first post..pheraps is the heavy browseing my black-east, my battery hell-daemon.. When you read you have to use display...when you use chaton/gmail/whatsapp...you have to use display too..

My doubt is that i dont understand battery stats proprely.. Because whe have the same use roughly...

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus con Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Mach3.2:
Like i said, some ROM sucks battery, one of them is CM10.1, that's why i switched ROM..
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] oubeichen:
I just found my reply to this thread was posted to another thread by mistake. repost here:)

Mine is commotio-B47/AK Kernel,and i get this now.Only surfing through wifi,low brightness near 0%,no game,zram off,and other trickstermod settings are just like yours.

Sounds unconvincing huh?

But yesterday,normally use(half game,half wifi) can also hit 3.5 hours so i think the rom is a good choice.

It is a pity that the rom only supports English,then many stuffs are strange for me in default settings(for example,google news widget only shows news of US and i dont know how to set).

And i heard that 3rd-party battery without NFC support (most of them are 2150mah)can improve battery performance sufficiently.but i dont have one.

hope u can understand my poor English.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] kekko986:
Yes! Infact now i m testing some roms...cm10.1m is my default/favourite one..today morning i have tested slim bean with a best result..i think.. Screens attached... Now it s time to Carbon... I like this rom...settings are clean and easy as in cm! Slim is very dispersive..but i lke minimall app/libs installation..lets see how Carbon is! Ot s a beautyful rom imo!:thumbup:

Slim s screen:

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus con Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] oubeichen:
maguro's battery performance is said to be better than toro and toroplus devices.I think you should figure out whether your battery works well or maybe buy another.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] kekko986:
I know... I think that if i can t do better...i will buy a 2000mha

Btw.. Can i ask you your settings and stats?

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus con Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] oubeichen:
trickermod:

Frequency: min180 ,max1060 ,max screen off 525 ,min screen on 230

Governor: westwood,768KB deadline,and hyper

MPU:a bit of undervolting(-50mv)

Core 800

Iva 800

Mpu 800

Content Adaptive Brightness off and Multicore Power Saving sets 1

black theme and wallpaper and low brightness is important(night here),i guess.

and i use process killer to close all the irrelevant background apps frequently.

here are the screenshots

battery use before unplugged are included in trickstermod stats,so just ignore it .Or you can refer to the time count of 1060Mhz.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] JuanG:
I use stock rom with stock root kernel. I reach approximately 3 days with 3h of screen on. I think that the key to obtain good battery life is to control the wkelocks of applications. I tested many applications and I have discovered that some are true battery killers. Today my battery is drained 0.2%/h in stand by with wifi and data off, only telephone enable. With wifi the consumption is a bit higher, 0.8%/h.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] kekko986:
I use Greenify to hibernate all apps...i keep alive (not freezed) only apps for messaging like chaton, fb messenger and whatsapp...all other apps are hibernate when screen goes off...how do you manage apps that generates wakelocks?

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus con Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] :
Thanks for sharing that.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] JuanG:
I don't use any app to hibernate the apps because I haven't installed any app that produce excessive wakelock.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] WayTooGosu:
Cool battery life!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Soldier 2.0:
These are my auto brightness levels. Helps save some battery.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] kekko986:
Is brightness curve preview an app? Where i can find this view?

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus con Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] oubeichen:
No No,trickstermod also counts the battery use before i unplugged.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Soldier 2.0:
Top right corner menu button while at the adjust values screen, preview. CM10.1 BTW.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] kekko986:
Aah ok..i m on carbon for now.. I cant see this button..thx anyway!

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus con Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] kekko986:
Nightly report on carbon+ak 225

Over all night in airplane mode(off:nfc wifi data gsm bluetooth gps sync) ..after 8.45h i have 4% battery drain

Screens : battery stats..wakelocks..version..settings..benchmark

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus con Tapatalk 2
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] kaiyoto123:
just flash ak kernel with nep's settings
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] kekko986:
All stock settings

Carbon 03/04/2013

Ak233

Partial stats (good) with google+ wakelocks

Inviato dal mio Galaxy Nexus con Tapatalk 2