yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Kindle Fire 2 Q&A, Help and Troubleshooting] Xperia Player:
I bought it on impulse, and with the intentions of rooting/modding it (easily) boy was I wrong.

Got it for $60 cash and a $20-30 item I no longer wanted, he was supposed to include the Kindle USB cord but couldn't find it and gave me a Motorola phone charger instead -.-

He's a pretty close friend, he told me he'd give it to me once he finds it, but that may be awhile...

Anyway, a little off subject there...

I read the ENTIRE sticky. Learned a few things but overall not too much.

Is there an idiots guide to rooting/modding this thing? I don't want to screw up, looks like people are bricking these things permanently & I don't want to fall victim of that.

Any advice or tutorials would be awesome.

Thanks.
[Kindle Fire 2 Q&A, Help and Troubleshooting] mrkhigh:
A fast boot or a factory cable is a cable that has pins shorted in it to force the kindle into a sort of download more that comes without an ui..

These have to bee special bought, they don't come with the kindle.

You don't have to have one but if you goof you'll most likely need it

For rooting it's pretty easy I just did one using a thread a few threads below this one you'll see my name thanking the guy who supplied the link

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=40170244 As to what rom no clue
[Kindle Fire 2 Q&A, Help and Troubleshooting] E_Zatopek:
I'm not allowed to answer your question posted in the "[Root][Working 10.2.4]" thread, hence posting here.

Before you continue with rooting, you may want to make sure your adb drivers are correctly installed.

Here's how you can do that:

- Abort the "RootQemu.bat" batch file

- At the command prompt (assuming the directory you copied the QemuRoot file to is your current directory) enter "adb devices"

- If not already running, the adb daemon needs to be started first, hence it will most probably respond with

"* daemon not running. starting it now *"

"* daemon started successfully *"

- Once the daemon is started, adb will try to connect to your devices via the adb drivers, which you need to have installed in a first step.

- If the drivers are properly installed and adb can connect to your device, above-mentioned command should return something similar as

"1234567880 device"

- If you are only getting "List of devices attached", then the adb drivers are not or not correctly installed

In this case you will need to go back to reading some more, get the drivers and/or learn how to properly install them.

Hope this helps. Good luck!
[Kindle Fire 2 Q&A, Help and Troubleshooting] Xperia Player:
Good news everyone (not a futurama pun)

I have successfully rooted & installed Google Play on my KF2!

Is there an easy way to change the launcher or ROM & move things from my internal memory to the cloud? Like for example I got a few things from the Google Play store and they go straight to my device, while other apps go to the cloud.

EDIT: How come my Kindle doesn't show up in My Computer when I connect it to my PC?

Thanks for the help so far.
[Kindle Fire 2 Q&A, Help and Troubleshooting] chronicfathead:
Kindlefree is an app that can help get you started on the Amazon ROM. Just make sure you are on a KF2 before flashing anything. Easiest way to tell is by the software version.

Anything 10. Will be a KF2.
[Xoom General] SoCalArm:
My xoom is a 3g xoom or 4g xoom but i don't use those at all and just wifi, im curious about CM10?

I am currently on 4.2.2 nightly 192. I really dont like the GUI( kudos to team eos, no pun ight?). I want to try out CM10 but, want to know if i can use TWRP? just add the gaps and cm10 to my SD wipe everything within twrp install cm10 and gapps and im good to go? I don't have a backup of my OEM Motorola ROM ( i lost it in a move):crying:.
[Xoom General] Warbuff:
Yep you can use twrp
[Xoom General] SoCalArm:
Awesome. Thanks

Sent from my SCH-i605 on Verizon 4G LTE.
[Off-topic] southphillysean:
What are your earliest memories of AOL?
[Off-topic] southphillysean:
I use to sever files for various gross via IM and emails. Then of course IRC came along and we started to do it from that using scripts and bots.
[Off-topic] Sgt Fury:
You got mail...

Sent from my SCH-I535
[Off-topic] WindroidApps:
BEEEP BEEEP BEEEP BEEEEEEP *GRINDING NOISES* BEEEP

Ahh dial up
[Off-topic] techahead:
it was sad to see aol leave but yes the memories are good, also the netscape browser was one good companion of Aol
[Off-topic] southphillysean:
The AOL chat rooms were the best. Then i got TOS' D for serving mail. Then went to Net Zero.... what's joke that was.
[Off-topic] Dirk:
I remember Millions of AOL CD Discs being in circulation. Stuck to the covers of magazines and everywhere you looked.
[Off-topic] Archer:
Stuck to the bottom of cups is what I remember. They became coffee cup mats.

I actually know someone who still uses AOL and swears that they're the biggest and best internet provider in the world. He literally won't be told otherwise.
[Off-topic] Dirk:
Is it this guy...?
[Off-topic] TheSkinnyDrummer:
Dirk, don't lie, that's you.

Sent from your mom.
[Off-topic] Archer:
Close, but he doesn't smoke :p
[Off-topic] Dirk:
My first experience of the Internet was using a Windows 95 PC with a 28K Dial-Up modem. Probably AOL, but i can't remember exactly. Ten minutes for one booby pic. It was horrendous! :eek:
[Off-topic] jaszek:
I still have some clients that use AOL. And they pay like $25 a month. On top of that, a few of them also have DSL, so they pay for that as well.
[Off-topic] TheSkinnyDrummer:
1994. I was graduating high school and Conan O'brien was in his second year on nbc. :thumbup::thumbup:

Sent from your mom.
[Off-topic] southphillysean:
This cds were in every food market by the cashiers. The mailman delivered one at least every week if not more. Then came the Different versions. I was so excited when i was able to change the "you got mail" sound!
[Off-topic] southphillysean:
I do. Same kind :rolleyes:
[Off-topic] Danial723:
+1 lol....loading a picture one row of pixels at a time :what:
[Off-topic] weirdpercent:
OMG...I was a teenager, I though I was so cool with my "proggies," punting people and visiting administrative keywords most people never saw. What a terrible service compared to the actual internet. It did get me more interested in programming though, playing around with Visual Basic.
[Off-topic] southphillysean:
Punting people through IM....

Classic!
[Off-topic] southphillysean:
How about signing on to AOL right before you get connected you hear. ....... the busy signal! I use to hate that!
[Off-topic] jRi0T68:
We tried aol briefly when it was still new. I hated it. As soon as we got a normal isp, and a top-of-the-line 14.4kbps modem, I used to think running Netscape Navigator on normal web browsing was the ****!

-Accidental Asshole aka Jeremy

[Guide] Headphone/Earphone Buying
[Off-topic] TheSkinnyDrummer:
I loved Netscape.

Sent from your mom.
[Off-topic] jRi0T68:
I remember when Communicator came out and it seemed so different, lol. I'd still use Navigator over IE today.

-Accidental Asshole aka Jeremy

[Guide] Headphone/Earphone Buying
[Off-topic] TheSkinnyDrummer:
Netscape had a great looking UI, very easy on the eyes, and always seemed smoother an anything else.
[Off-topic] jRi0T68:
Damn right. Those were the days I learned about IRC, used mIRC, good times.

-Accidental Asshole aka Jeremy

[Guide] Headphone/Earphone Buying
[Off-topic] TheSkinnyDrummer:
I did have a year long relationship with a girl I met from AOL, so it wasn't all bad.
[Off-topic] jRi0T68:
Lol! I had a girl I met in IRC trying to come down to SoCal from Washington just to hook up, then she got here and hooked up with one of my paintball teammates while I was at work and she was staying near him in HB. :beer: to internet chicks! (All of you here are totally cool, I just mean the kind I mentioned. Don't brick me, please, BD)

-Accidental Asshole aka Jeremy

[Guide] Headphone/Earphone Buying
[Off-topic] TheSkinnyDrummer:
My AOL girlfriend was from Washington....creepy.
[Off-topic] jRi0T68:
Was her name Denise?

-Accidental Asshole aka Jeremy

[Guide] Headphone/Earphone Buying
[Off-topic] TheSkinnyDrummer:
Nope, Molly. Molly from Gig Harbor.
[Off-topic] jRi0T68:
Then you probably faired better from the experience than I did, lol.

-Accidental Asshole aka Jeremy

[Guide] Headphone/Earphone Buying
[Off-topic] TheSkinnyDrummer:
She was a hardcore vegan, and I made her take me to McDonalds constantly. I had fun with it.
[Off-topic] jRi0T68:
Mine was a hardcore slut, unbeknownst to me prior to her arrival. She made many other guys take her to Pound Town.

-Accidental Asshole aka Jeremy

[Guide] Headphone/Earphone Buying
[Off-topic] TheSkinnyDrummer:
Super.

Sounds like the girl that took my virginity....she got pregnant while we were together. Not by me. Her son is now 17.
[Off-topic] jRi0T68:
I did get the chance to shoot the living crap out of her (we met in a paintball chatroom). Sheer domination and avoiding her drama in person left me with the upper hand.

On topic, though... aol is still actually around somewhere?

-Accidental Asshole aka Jeremy

[Guide] Headphone/Earphone Buying
[Off-topic] southphillysean:
I thought i was the only one. ....15 years later and still with her.
[Off-topic] southphillysean:
I used make trivia bots and scripts for IrC and mIRC.
[Off-topic] southphillysean:
Not only are they still around. The made 354 million dollars last year. They make are their money through advertising.
[Off-topic] weirdpercent:
I think the ONLY reason they are still around (besides being bought by Time Warner) is that they have the word "America" in their name. They're a playpen for people who know nothing about the Internet and will happily shell out a monthly subscription fee for IM, chatrooms, and "content."
[Off-topic] southphillysean:
If that is the case then credit to whomever came up with the name.
[Off-topic] Babydollll:
"You've got mail" :rolleyes:

My dad STILL uses AOL desktop and IE. :banghead:
[Off-topic] Danial723:
Thread killer :p
[One (M7) General] adsam3927:
HTC has updated the frequencies spec sheet to reflect better what we can expect from global variations of the One :

http://www.htc.com/www/smartphones/htc-one/#specs

Specifically , frequencies:

2G/2.5G - GSM/GPRS/EDGE:

850/900/1800/1900 MHz

3G - UMTS/ HSPA:

Europe/ Middle East/ Africa: : 900/1900/2100 MHz with HSDPA up to 42 Mbps

Asia: 850/900/1900/2100 MHz with HSDPA up to 42 Mbps

Canada/ Latin America: 850/1900/2100 MHz up to HSDPA 42 Mbps

T-Mobile (US): 850/ AWS/1900/2100 MHz with HSDPA up to 42 Mbps

AT&T: 850/1900/2100 MHz with HSDPA up to 21 Mbps

Sprint: 1900/2100 MHz with HSDPA up to 14.4 Mbps

3G - CDMA:

800/1900 MHz for Sprint

4G - LTE:

Europe/ Middle East/ Africa: 800/1800/2600 MHz

Asia: 1800/2600 MHz

T-Mobile (US)/ AT&T/ Canada/ Latin America: 700 MHz and AWS band

Sprint: 1900 MHz

At HTC blog site the frequencies for the HTC Developers edition is listed as :

http://blog.htc.com/2013/03/htc-one-developer-edition/

"Multiple frequency compatibility:

HSPA/WCDMA: 850/1900/2100 MHz

GSM/GPRS/EDGE: 850/900/1800/1900 MHz

LTE: 700/850/AWS/1900 MHz (US)"

With the AT&T version you can see that AT&T only gets HSDPA up to 21Mbps whereas the Canada version with the same bands gets up to 42Mbps

Question : Based on the Dev edition bands it looks like it should get DC- HSPA at 42 Mbps....is that right ??

I'd love to know that when I'm in an area with poor LTE coverage I can at least expect to get DC-HSPA speeds up to 42Mbps.
[One (M7) General] Nyxagamemnon:
I would guess its dc 42 by default and att rom/ modem restritcs to 21

Its the same hardware but cant be 100% sure until we get the devices.
[One (M7) General] xcesivemastub8ah:
that's because ATTs hspa+ network maxes out at 21. So if you're on att thats max you can get. Regardless of radio. You're not going to pull speeds that aren't available.
[One (M7) General] Riyal:
Hi wrong! The specs stated there is the maximum bandwidth not the network's maximum speed. It would be a bad marketing for HTC if they were to put 21 if the true maximum speed is up to 42mbps. Take note that the numbers game plays with marketing perfectly.

And also HSPA+ is different than DC-HSDPA.

DC-HSDPA is a next generation HSPA+ where the bandwidth was doubled. And HTC stating that AT&T version doesn't get DC-HSDPA only means that it has different modem chipset than the others since there's no way to limit or multiply a bandwidth through software means.

It's just like making a single core processor a dual core by modifying a software.
[One (M7) General] mouzaihem:
Wait, what the hell? So the developer edition works on T-Mobiles network? When was this updated?

Nevermind, for some reason I thought it also included the 1700 band. :)
[One (M7) General] Riyal:
I'm not sure about the developer edition but the specs page of HTC was updated likely 19 hours ago.
[One (M7) General] xcesivemastub8ah:
Hi wrong. Yea I don't know what you're trying to say. He asked about the att variant so I assumed he was on att. Which doesnt do dc-hspa+ . So if he's thinking he can buy the dev version and pull down 42, which I assumed was the purpose of the post, on att its not going to happen. I'm not sure were you got your marketing degree but Bad marketing would be if HTC would to say on the att variant specs that you can get anything more than 21 with the phone locked down to atts network. Imagine all the upset people on att suing them when they cant pull down 42 they claim on specs because atts network isn't built for 42. Not good marketing. The phone is for att and that's the maximum speed att gives so HTC is going to post it as the maximum speed for the att one. Simple..
[One (M7) General] Nyxagamemnon:
The qualcom mdm chipset is the same it supports dc hspa+ att only uses singlecarrier on there network.

Its all the ul version.
[One (M7) General] Riyal:
Hi! I don't have a marketing degree sorry I'm a programmer not a marketer :D

Anyways what if AT&T would somehow decide to upgrade their HSDPA speeds in the next 6 months? Or maybe announce tomorrow that they will upgrade it soon? Isn't it a big down for HTC? The specs made there are not specs of the network where the phone is to be used. It's the specs of the phone itself. You can't advertise a phone that it doesn't have LTE only just because the networks that will be used in it doesn't support it right?

The qualcomm MDM chipset has different versions.

Anandtech alone confirmed that the Asian version & the UK version has different MDM chipsets used.

You guys are basing facts on assumptions that came from others while I am basing it on technicalities. So I guess I'll leave it out on others to decide which they think is correct.

And yeah AT&T isn't using UL version. You can go to this thread instead

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2223236

and see that it's a WL version.
[One (M7) General] xcesivemastub8ah:
I don't know how we got off topic but Yes. The specs ARE of the network that they are to be used on since a carrier variant is tied to a specific carrier. Listen, You can't advertise a phone being able to download 42mbps on a network that doesn't have it. Its false advertising to tell att customers that they can get 42mbps with this phone. Which is what they would be saying if att one specs said 42 instead of 21. And what I was trying to clarify to the OP that he's not going to get. It doesn't matter if it had a chip capable of 1 million mbps. Its a phone meant specifically to be used on att and att can only do 21 so that's all they're going to tell you the phone can do because that's all you(the general public) need to know. As for your last sentence, You can and they do. Just Look at the nexus 4. No LTE advertising but LTE capable. If att was deciding they wanted to upgrade their network it wouldn't be a big down for HTC. All they would have to do is change the Att one specs on their site.

And att variant and dev edition are the same. Both the UL version. WL is cdma. Sprint.
[One (M7) General] expertzero1:
ATT is ul. Mile needs to update his op

---------- Post added at 01:01 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:59 AM ----------

ATT stopped working on hspa.

Its LTE right now and a bud of mine told me they are currently turning on LTE Advanced. In my area they already turned it on but no press release though. You just see a minor speed bump until lte advanced chips are supported
[One (M7) General] adsam3927:
WOW !

I didn't realise my post would cause such a kerfuffle...I'm in Canada and simply wanted to know based on official specs provided whether the Dev edition would pull in DC-HSDPA speeds on Telus network that supports this dual channel technology
[One (M7) General] xcesivemastub8ah:
The reason why att variant advertises different speeds even though theyre the same m7-ul model was given in the first 2 responses. Unlocked models don't advertise speed because there's no carrier to advertise for. The thread took a turn for the worst when, for whatever reason, someone decided they were going to hijackand and fill the thread with "facts" based on misinformation.
[One (M7) General] stevedebi:
In case no one answered the OP, the answer is NO. Unless the published specs are wrong, it will not operate on the 1700/2100 band. I believe that is the same technology used by T-Mobile?
[One (M7) General] TheGman125:
Does anyone know if this would work on Verizon Wireless?
[One (M7) General] Du22ty:
I asked Brian Klug, the author of the Anandtech review, this exact question and here is my question and his response.

"Hey Brian I have a quick question for you. Will the unlocked editions support HSPA+ 42?"

"The developer unlocked edition is only 21.1 single carrier 64QAM from what I know (AT&T variant)."

Judging by his review he's a lot smarter than I am so I'll take his word until we have confirmation otherwise.
[One (M7) General] htowngator:
It always has. You just had to be in the refarmed 1900 or the LTE areas to get better than 2G.

---------- Post added at 05:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:54 PM ----------

No, it won't. No CDMA authorization for it to do so.
[One (M7) General] adsam3927:
That's disappointing... I really was hoping to have the 2 current best speeds for the One...LTE and upto 42Mbps.

Im with Telus and beginning to wonder if I should sacrifice 32Gb of storage and go with a Telus LTE/42Mbps device
[One (M7) General] Nyxagamemnon:
I highly doubt its 21 hes speculating. I posted info from diffrent sources regardingthe dc42. The mdm9215 supports dchspa by default.
[One (M7) General] stevedebi:
It is 21 if using AWS on the T-Mobile system. I don't know what it gets on ATT.
[One (M7) General] TheGman125:
now per the website link that is post. It has the frequency for sprint and the LTE radio for Verizon. Can you tell me more about that.
[One (M7) General] htowngator:
Verizon requires you to authorize on CDMA before it logs you into LTE.
[One (M7) General] rpmccormick:
...but Sprint is a CDMA network too. Not that I care, but I am curious to know if the Sprint HTC One could work on VZW, and if not then why?
[One (M7) General] htowngator:
Different handshake, frequency

Just like plugging a Sprint sim into a vzw phone doesn't work and vice versa.
[One (M7) General] phiphi42:
Hi,

Do you think there is a difference with europeen model's ?
[One (M7) General] qnet:
This is the most confusing subject for me. I keep reading a lot of conflicting information. I will be glad when I recieve the phone myself to test on Tmobile. I'm also glad my city has been refarmed to 1900MHz.
[One (M7) General] rpmccormick:
Well, that's true especially since neither of them use SIMs (I guess they do for LTE now or something, but your VZW phone will still work for calls with no SIM... it's for LTE-data only AFAIK). Instead of a SIM, you have to give them your phones MSL and then they activate it on their end... if they want to.

I feel I understand most of it at this point, but I still don't know what to expect as far as actual speed difference between DevEdition on TMO 1900 and TMO version on 1700. There are reasons to believe 1700 can be up to twice as fast, and with better coverage. There are also reasons to believe the will be close to identical here in Austin. I suppose TMO LTE will be here soon enough, and it doesn't really matter once that happens (assuming good coverage).
[One (M7) General] htowngator:
They absolutely use SIM cards if the phone is LTE enabled. It won't work without one -- not even on CDMA only.
[One (M7) General] qnet:
I'm thinking the Tmo version with the 1700 band will be faster also. I was tempted to cancel my Dev model order and wait next week for the Tmo version but I really want that 64GB of storage and unlocked sim & bootloader. I agree though, when Tmo's LTE is readily available it won't matter hopefully.
[One (M7) General] TheGman125:
Now would this version working in sprint and I spoke with HTC Support and they said it may or may not work.

Do you personality have one of the new developer modes and have tried Verizon activation.
[One (M7) General] stevedebi:
I am in exactly the same boat. The T-Mobile 1900 AWS band (which the dev edition supports) is limited to 21 download, while the 1700/2100 T-Mobile One will do 42 download. BTW, I've decided to stay with my dev order.

I think LTE speeds will be the same - once an area has LTE.
[One (M7) General] sirmims:
this might have already been answered but would the unlocked version work with Verizon?
[One (M7) General] Elemenopee:
So I preordered the Unlocked One, which I believe has the same radios as the Dev version. Since it has AWS LTE, I figured it would be compatible with TMos LTE. Are you guys saying that there are 2 types of AWS? One is 1700 and the other is 1900? I thought the unlocked and dev versions support band 4, which is 1700/2100.
[One (M7) General] stevedebi:
No, the unlocked and dev versions do not support 1700/2100 from what I have read, and have discussed here on XDA. Only HSPA 1900 (where available on Tmo). LTE should work on Tmo, when that network gets fleshed out.

EDIT: I see the reason for the confusion. LTE AWS is at 1900. But the Tmo special "HSPA+" uses a special 1700/2100 band, which is also called AWS.
[One (M7) General] Elemenopee:
I've read that TMo is using the 1900 band for the HSPA42 and Band 4 (AWS 1700) for LTE ' http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/t-mobile-launches-hspa-1900-mhz-spectrum-las-vegas/2012-09-21'. This concurs with reports of people who have been able to receive LTE signals on their Nexus 4, which also have AWS LTE radio. I've also seen a reply from HTCDev confirming that the Unlocked and Dev versions of the One will work on TMo's LTE. If you look at the specs for the Unlocked and Dev versions on HTC's site, it shows that both versions have AWS LTE.

What I really want to know is does TMo have 2 LTE spectrums one being 1700 and the other 1900?
[One (M7) General] stevedebi:
They have 1900 refarmed band, but it only supports 21 download speed. The LTE is a different issue entirely, and should be higher speed.

Currently the HSPDA+ at 42 download is only on the AWS 1700/1900 T-Mobile bands.
[One (M7) General] illestfob:
Hi, my question is in two parts since I am trying to understand.

I'm in the Boston area, which is supposed to be refarmed to the 1900 band. If I am in an area that doesnt pick up the 1900 band, does my phone switch back to the AWS 1700/1900 band? Assuming I purchase the T-Mobile One.

And once T-Mobile flips the switch on LTE, in areas where there wont be any LTE coverage, is the phone going to fall back on 1900 band (in areas that are refarmed) or the old AWS bands? Or are those being turned off once LTE turns on?
[One (M7) General] stevedebi:
First one is yes, it switches.

Second one is yes, it falls back, I don't know what T-Mobile is going to do with lte.
[One (M7) General] rpmccormick:
Good question. As I understand it, the LTE upgrade is part of the 1900 refarm, so any area with 1900 will soon get LTE. Does that mean they will be turning off AWS HSPA+ when they turn on AWS LTE?
[One (M7) General] stevedebi:
Of course, it won't make any difference to the T-Mobile One, since it will do either. But since it runs on completely different frequencies, I suspect they will keep the 1700/2100 around for a while.