yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Motorola Atrix HD] spinninbsod:
uxylon

im finding uxylon is stable fast and the only i find that doesent work is google voice but iffyouwant everything to work juststay with the rooted stock rom and put a different ui because moto blur is horrible

---------- Post added 25th July 2013 at 12:06 AM ---------- Previous post was 24th July 2013 at 11:59 PM ----------

uxylon is good everything works except for google voice if you want google voice just root the stockrom but you will get an old version of jellybean

if you get it from att ifnotit will come with ics
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] saco274:
Hi all,

I purchased 2 HTC One 64gb developers edition phones. One for myself and one for my wife. I have been on the forums and I just can't seem to find an clear answer on which carrier would suit us best.

1. As I understand it, the unlocked version does not support TMo's 1700mhz but it does support 1900Mhz which was 1700 but now its 1900. Can someone educate me on this. Is this 1700/1900 HSPA+ or LTE? I'm having trouble understanding between the two.

2. What frequency does LTE run on for TMo and At&t respectively

3. Does having the boot loader unlocked just mean that I have SU permission and I can flash custom roms but not kernels?

Any help would be appreciated...:D
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Funk2641:
1. The 1900 is HSPA+ only

2. T-Mo LTE is AWS (1700/2100) only, ATT LTE is AWS and 700mhz

3. The bootloader unlocked means you can flash custom roms, as I recall. You'll still need to root for SU permission.
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] milamas:
I can answer 1 and 2. (1) The 1900 band is for their 3G HSPA+ service which t-mo brands as "4g" so if your area does not have real LTE provided by t-mo you have to have the 1900 refarm available to use 3G HSPA+ Speeds. (2) T-mo and ATT LTE are both supported by the HTC ONE DEV so you dont have to worry about that. TL;DR - LTE is good for both carriers. 3G HSPA+ needs the 1900 refarm for t-mo
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Perry977:
Just unlocked bootloader doesn't mean you have SU permission...u gonna have to flash custom recovery then flash a custom Rom or just the SU package to.have root access
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] saco274:
Thanks guys, I think I have a pretty good Idea of who my next carrier is going to be. Now is the the forum for developers edition phone. Is this the forum where I can get my roms kernels for this specific phone?
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] stevedebi:
So I will need a custom recovery, or can I flash the SU package alone with the stock recovery?
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Toaster Strudels:
Yes, this is the correct forum. I'd advise you keep your wife's phone stock ;) They usually aren't too fond of husbands flashing/modding/bricking their phones too often :p

Also, from now on, post questions in the Q&A forum for our phone.
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Perry977:
U will need the custom recovery...choice between custom Rom and stock Rom with SU package is upto u
[One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] saco274:
Its funny you say that cause my wife is the one who bails me out when I brick my phone.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] atech087:
[Q] Help!

Okay. So i just rooted my phone yesterday and i flashed a ROM. Well I forgot to backup all my apps and such. So I went back into CWM and I cleared data and flashed my nandroid recovery file. That completed successfully, so I push restart system at the top. Well now it is just stuck in the boot screen and won't do anything. How do I fix this! HELP!
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] atech087:
I can't get into CWM either. It just keeps rebooting and getting stuck on the boot screen.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] Theraze:
For getting back to CWM, pull the battery (USB unplugged) so it turns off fully, put the battery back in, hold the volume up and down both on the left, and turn it on (hold power until you see something, let go of power but keep holding the volume keys). Once you see CWM come on, you can let go of the volume keys.

You flashed what from what? If what you flashed isn't the same major OS version, the nandroid backup is probably only going to be helpful through Titanium Backup or some other program since you won't be able to flash it successfully.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] atech087:
Ok so I tried to get back into CWM and it was unsuccessful. It just gets stuck on the boot screen still. I flashed my 2.3.6 stock rooted nandroid backup from this custom rom: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1404863 . I can still get to recovery mode just not CWM. Any ideas?
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] Theraze:
Okay... recovery mode but not CWM... what does that mean?

CWM IS recovery mode. Are you trying to get into download mode instead? For that, battery pull, battery in, plug in USB to computer, hold volume... up (I think), turn on (power button until the screen lights up), let go of power, should be in download mode.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] atech087:
Yeah.. I meant i couldn't get into recovery mode but I can get into download mode. Do you think this would get my phone working again? http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1358498
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] Theraze:
Working as a phone, yes. If you can get into download mode, you should be able to flash stuff. If you flashed from Froyo to GB-custom, use the one-click twice... first to get the basic ROM over, then tell it to do bootloaders as well. If you flashed from GB to GB-custom, then you only need to flash once.

I'd suggest using the second link, BWaT+stock. Basically, from here:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1822626

If you have any problems, make sure you're following the guide fully:

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=21953878&postcount=2

After you get it booting up with root, you can extract apps from the nandroid using Titanium Backup or something else similar.
[Samsung Galaxy S (4G Model)] atech087:
Thanks. I used http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1358498 this and am just going to reboot and everything all over again using this guide http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1470716 and hope I don't have this problem again. Thanks for your help!!!!!
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] MikeyLee:
Just in case any of you want to get out of your Sprint contract heres how!

On page 2/7 on your Sprint Bill it will say: Tax & Surcharge Base Changes. Effective 4/1/13, Sprint will be changing tax systems for charges such as insurance & premium content. This update may cause an increase of taxes and/or surcharges on your bill for these products. For details of taxes & surcharges, visit sprint.com/taxesandfees. This is how you get out of it because it is whats called a "Material Change" meaning it will cost you more! You have to call or chat with Sprint before the end of this month (April) or you will not be able to do it. I'm leaving because I have paid full price for half the service of 4G and LTE customers for far too long.

They may tell you its not a change but it is!
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] pwhitersxs:
Did this work for you?
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] Skripka:
Hoss, a Material Change does not necessarily mean high costs... A material change just means a large enough change in the legalese of the contract to warrant an opportunity for the consumer to get out... Rather than being strong armed into the new terms with no chance for a way out without exorbitant ETFs.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] SPreston2001:
Hmmm I may have use this to my advantage. I too am tired of waiting for lte and being stuck with the slowest 3g ever. My note is a glorified paperweight when not connected to a wifi network...
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] wolfeyes30:
I know the feeling. Might have to take advantage of this too.

OP... thanks for posting this :thumbup:
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] mackentosh:
Good to know
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] -EViL-KoNCEPTz-:
They're only letting people out if their bill actually goes up because it only applies to "premium" content, and so far everyone's bill has actually gone down a few cents.

☆SoA: Son's of Android™☆

I like to break stuff! :D
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] joe1blue:
So in other words it won't work :(. I have a second line and i would like to cancel it without the fee
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] -EViL-KoNCEPTz-:
So far I've only seen 2 or 3 ppl successfully weasel out on this one. There's not much wiggle room on this one since it only affects premium content and it appears the surcharges actually dropped a fraction of a percent instead of increasing. However if for some reason your bill went up by 1cent you can get out. The material change clause is only for materially adverse changes, ie effects you negatively.

☆SoA: Son's of Android™☆

I like to break stuff! :D
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] ls3mach:
I don't pay my bill personally, so I have no idea if mine actually went up. Question being. Can my Note II be sold and activated by someone else? I got a cease and desist letter when I was forcing roam on my last phone. I assumed they'd just cancel my contract and I'd get to keep my device.

Finally who is everyone changing to? Verizon is a minimum $100 with $60 of that being 2GB of data, which is paltry. I don't so much care about the money I'd like better service, but 2GB of data isn't likely enough.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] jefbal99:
Columbus had their first accepted NV complete tower this week. Working is on going...
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] -EViL-KoNCEPTz-:
T-Mo $70/mo truly unlimited if they have good coverage in your area. I wouldn't recommend VZW to someone I hated after all the BS I've had to deal with them for my mom. :thumbdown:

☆SoA: Son's of Android™☆

I like to break stuff! :D
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] sweets55:
Really. Where? Go Bucks!
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] SPreston2001:
I sure hope so. I've been with Sprint for over 10yrs and would hate to leave but man its been rough these last 3-4yrs.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] wolfeyes30:
Stopped at the local Sprint store and they knew nothing. I called customer service and they told me you can't get out of the contract for surcharge or tax changes. Not sure I believe it or not.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] honki24:
I was just looking at Ting today (Ting.com) and thinking to myself - man this would be a good deal for someone who's currently with sprint and was out of their contract. I then realized I'd owe Sprint an ETF of $350 for my Note 2 which killed my dreams. Also I want to get my wife an S4 this month.... not sure if I want to go subsidized for $250 and go another 2 years or if I'd like to try to get out of the contract this way and buy it outright for the likely $600+ that it would be from amazon or the likes.

---------- Post added at 03:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:59 PM ----------

Never believe the first level customer service person. You have to go above their head. Also, the sprint store knows nothing unless they get it in some technical bulletin (in which case you're lucky if they actually read it and aren't a 17-yr-old-dropout)
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] wolfeyes30:
Yeah....I know. Was in the neighborhood, reason I stopped in. I enjoy watching the puzzled look on their faces :D

They transferred me to accounts department and thats what they told me. Gonna call again to get someone higher up.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] mackentosh:
Verizon is a little higher $ wise but the service and data is the best in my opinion
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] wolfeyes30:
I agree.

Priced Verizon today. About $9 more per month for me and my girl. Yes I know they cap the data, but it's there when you need it. Spend most of my time on wifi, so data not a deal breaker for me.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] 00mred00:
Prolly worth mentioning Ting uses Sprint's network. I would also disect their plans and compare to your usage. It's hardly a good deal at all for anyone that uses their phone.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ting_(cell_phone_company)

Making that assumption about Sprint stores is absurd. Most of my team is in their 30's and have a good idea of whats going on. When they don't they find the answer.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] devynbf:
My bill went up by 10 dollars a month from the material change. Would I be able to get out my my contract?

How would I approach and state this to a Sprint representative?
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] hawk915402:
Called Sprint today

I called Sprint and spoke to several reps (escalated about 8 times). I was told that they do not control what the government charges for taxes. After going through it for over an hour I hung up and went straight to their terms of service. It states that surcharges are not gov't fees or taxes but a fee sprint charges to off set those fees. On your March bills they let you know that they were changing how this fee was calculated. According to what I read this is not a material change. Depending on who you ask it is. But if your bill does go up it is materially adverse.

The Sprint contract states that your contract can be terminated without an ETF if

d. in response to a materially adverse change that we make to the agreement.

Here is another relevant part of the contract terms:

We may change any part of the Agreement at any time, including, but not limited to, rates, charges, how we calculate charges, discounts, coverage, technologies used to provide services, or your terms of Service. We will provide you notice of material changes—and we may provide you notice of non-material changes—in a manner consistent with this Agreement (see "Providing Notice To Each Other Under The Agreement" section). If a change we make to the Agreement is material and has a material adverse effect on Services under your Term Commitment, you may terminate each line of Service materially affected without incurring an Early Termination Fee only if you: (a) call us within 30 days after the effective date of the change; and (b) specifically advise us that you wish to cancel Services because of a material change to the Agreement that we have made. If you do not cancel Service within 30 days of the change, an Early Termination Fee will apply if you terminate Services before the end of any applicable Term Commitment.

Sprint Surcharges are rates we choose to collect from you to help defray costs imposed on us. Surcharges are not taxes on you or amounts we are required to collect from you by law. Surcharges other charges incurred to recover costs associated with governmental programs, and certain taxes imposed upon Sprint. The amounts, and the components used to calculate Surcharge amounts, are subject to change.

I am going to try arguing with Sprint one more time tonight then I am going to bed. I have filed a complaint with the FTC and I suggest everyone else do the same.

PS When the call escalates it seems to go past a supervisor to someone ignorant enough to try to shut you down no matter what. With that said I am calling sprint again armed with the information that I amassed. The ignorant rep kept asking me what is it that I am specifically referring to and I believe that is the important part as far as getting out of the contract without paying the ETF.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] monkeyracer:
Honestly you guys are pretty ridiculous.

Sprint reps in the stores have no way of cancelling contracts, (hence why they tell you to call it in...) therefore they won't be aware of what this kind of "get out of jail free" kind of thing is. Do not waste your gas money and time (and more importantly don't waste the reps time).

You are sitting here complaining about a few cents change as a way to get out of a contract, then talking about going to a capped data network. Go over your cap and see how much more per month it is (a lot more than a few cents). This only affects those who use premium content. If this applies to you, suck up the few extra cents because it's a drop in the bucket compared to the competition.

Generally, Sprint retention department (the ones that actually have the ability to cancel a line of service) has a list of changes that are ETF waiving, and if this is one of them, they would have been doing it for many people.

BTW, no one is paying extra for 4G; the $10 premium data is charged to all smartphones, even the 3G only ones. So, you can't claim you are paying for LTE that you don't get yet.

Also, the FTC is fully aware of this kind of activity, and are only going to "file it", there will be no action unless it was significant, and affected a significant amount of people. It will cost the FTC more to "file it" than the amount you are actually paying extra.

Moral of the story is: Stop whining, and get over it.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] yankees45us:
Very true in some of your points. But reason for people wanting to get out is not due to price increase, it's due to horribly slow 3g and very slow lte rollout. This is a very valid reason to try to get out. I don't blame them. As for losing unlimited data that's beside the point, what's the use of unlimited when you can't even use data to post a tweet? At this point I'd rather have 2gb of data over unlimited as long as i get good speed. That said, my speed in my town has been improving. I can actually go into app store without getting "unable to load" message. As far as having good signal inside a building, that's still not available. Hopefully by end of year things change. By then I will decide if tmobile will be my new cell company, for now Sprint will have me as a customer.

Sent from my Amazing Galaxy Note 2!
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] -EViL-KoNCEPTz-:
Slow LTE rollout? It's not like they just need to press a button, they have hundreds if not thousands of towers that require hardware modifications to enable LTE, it's not instantaneous. There's a limited number of workers to do the upgrades it's not like they can send a team to every tower at the same time and upgrade the entire network over night. Other carriers give the illusion that it's a simple and quick process simply because they lease towers that are operational ready that were never online so it appears that they just instantly upgraded their tower, when in reality that tower was upgraded by a 3rd party prior to the carrier's announcement that LTE would be available in that location.

☆SoA: Son's of Android™☆

I like to break stuff! :D
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] yankees45us:
It's slow compared to Verizon. But just as we talk about this Sprint just turned on 21 more cities! So things are looking good for those that decide to stick it out with Sprint.

Sent from my Amazing Galaxy Note 2!
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] -EViL-KoNCEPTz-:
Verizon is one of the carriers I'm talking about. They leased towers ready to go, it only appeared fast because the towers were already ready when they announced it was going live. Verizon leases their LTE towers from a 3rd party who builds and maintains the infrastructure.

☆SoA: Son's of Android™☆

I like to break stuff! :D

---------- Post added at 12:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:00 PM ----------

The work on Verizons towers started before sprint started with wimax, or close to the same time. Only Verizon didn't announce their LTE network until most of the towers were complete and didn't turn them on as they went like sprint is doing. It wasn't til almost 18months after the actual build out began that Verizon announced they'd offer LTE, by that time most of the new infrastructure was ready to go live.

☆SoA: Son's of Android™☆

I like to break stuff! :D
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] SPreston2001:
Ok well that brings up the question why didn't Sprint do the same?? At this point Sprint is severely behind the 8ball in terms of LTE and 3g data speeds. I understand that they are trying to rebuild the network from the ground up, but people don't care how it works or what it takes to make it work they just want it to work. When you see every other carrier blowing Sprint out of the water you have to wonder wth is Sprint doing. I wouldn't even care about the slow LTE rollout if my 3g could consistently manage paltry 512k dialup speeds. I'm lucky if my speeds can reach .1mbps...
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] -EViL-KoNCEPTz-:
Sprint got screwed on WiMax. Clear started strong and then shriveled up like a grape in the sun. It cost sprint a lot of time and money. This time instead of relying on a 3rd party and risking taking it up the ass again, they chose to handle the roll out of LTE and the upgrades to 3g/1x themselves. They just happened to be more transparent and announce their plans ahead of time, which made everyone impatient.

☆SoA: Son's of Android™☆

I like to break stuff! :D
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] SPreston2001:
Yeah I completely understand the whole Wimax debacle but I think everybody except Sprint knew that was a bad decision and that LTE would be the future. LTE wasn't ready at the time and instead of being patient and waiting on the better technology they dove headfirst into Wimax without noticing it was a shallow 3ft pool lol. I guess they're still paying for that mistake.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] -EViL-KoNCEPTz-:
Well theoretically WiMax can actually be faster than LTE if implemented properly. I think sprint was hoping and planning for the proper implementation but got screwed on frequency blocks and had to make due with what they could get. There's a town in Tennessee nicknamed gigcity that uses a local WiMax infrastructure to broadcast 1gbps internet to the entire town for free. They just happened to use the proper implementation of the hardware and frequency ranges, I think sprint may have seen that and thought "THAT, is what we want and its available now" and then leaped in without fully researching the spectrum requirements and availability of the proper spectrum to do it.

☆SoA: Son's of Android™☆

I like to break stuff! :D
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] yankees45us:
I think for the average consumer, they don't care wether towers are leased or wholly owned. What matters is the coverage and speed for the consumer. Example: Verizon just gained over 700,000 customers even with tiered data and higher prices. In the end I'm sticking with Sprint but it's understandable when people are still not completely sure on them

Sent from my Amazing Galaxy Note 2!
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] -EViL-KoNCEPTz-:
I don't think Sprint cares whether the customer is interested in who owns the towers. Sprint did it to protect themselves financially another repeat of the clear incident would bankrupt them. It's called being fiscally responsible, if Sprint hadn't started posting profits relatively quick they were headed into bankruptcy. It's actually cheaper for them to build their own network and invest in themselves than dump that money into a 3rd party and hope and pray they don't get fu*ked again.

☆SoA: Son's of Android™☆

I like to break stuff! :D
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] SPreston2001:
I just hope they dont jack up the prices once they complete the rebuild in efforts to recoup the cash it took to complete the overhaul. Ive been with Sprint for over 10yrs and really like everything about them except their data speeds. Give me decent data and im happy. Im not one of those people who purposely abuse the unlimited data. I would certainly never exceed 5gb a month. Hell I doubt I would even run through 2gb considering how much I use wifi lol.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] flight01:
They are already recouping their loss with the $10 smartphone fee. No matter what anyone says it's for 4g. They got in trouble for charging without customers actually having it available so the turned it into a smartphone fee instead. Its used to supplement the cost of building 4g and network vision