yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] ts1506:
Re: [ROM][4.2.2] GamerzROM Legend Edition v1.0 | 04.04.2013

First impressions

1. Awesome boot animation.

2. Old kernel (derteufel has pushed lots of changes which are not there in this one).

3. Speed is not too good, its more or less like other ROMs.

Now to games.

1. Temple run 2 - no lags

2. MC4 - slight lag

3. Vice City - like other ROMs.

In UI

1. More or less same customization as slim.

2. Lags in the launcher and settings(although games are better)

Rest

1. Free ram around 140MB/395MB, this is after fresh flash, only temple run 2, vice city and mc4 installed.

Missing

1. GamerzROM manager, which was supossed to be there, is missing.

2. Translucent widgets which burakgon showed earlier are missing too.

Overall impressions

Really hard for me to say, but this one isn't impressive at all to me. GamerzROM v11 was far more satisfying back in its day. But I guess this one will get better with v2,v3 etc.

Sorry for the critical comment.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] dzi0bas:
Hi,

How to enable debugging? I want to repair imei :(
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] burakgon:
Get a job mate. Stop trolling my thread. Even if you flash AOKP most of your settings will stay. And you flashing slim which my ROM is based. Isn't it normal?

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=537204

I won't answer you more. Because you are non-respectful leecher.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Driv:
AW: [ROM][4.2.2] GamerzROM Legend Edition v1.0 | 04.04.2013

Wow apps starting so slow ....

I will try this Rom for the next 3 days :p

Btw. Firsttime i used the Browser (ad in xda) it redirected me to some porn sites ... Lol ...
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] burakgon:
Thanks for nice test mate. Translucent widgets were ugly for some people. So I keep it default. GamerzROM Manager is half ready. But people wants the ROM instantly. I hope it will be better overtime.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] burakgon:
Did you full wipe mate. I don't think it's that bad. I'm a cyanogen fan but I find this one much faster with more features(slim base). That's why I released it.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] burakgon:
Made a fast test. Not best but it's ok.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Haxxan7:
+1
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Driv:
Ok i'm on 1.3 and my phone reboots when i install few games via Playstore(pc)

I hope this is just because of Slimbean and will change with CM
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] alb3rtt:
Yes its a slim bug.

---------- Post added at 12:49 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:47 AM ----------

Every phone is different so even if he gives you his voltages/settings doesn't mean that it will work for you.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] diddsen:
thats clear, but a base would be helpful.

if not run, ok... but then can try to do ;)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] saszseb:
My experience is that AOKP is a bit faster than CM.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] burakgon:
All AOKP repo forked from CM. We don't need stupid unicorn wallpapers.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Fang Leone:
When I connect my phone to computer and turn on USB it reboots any solution ?

Sent from my GT-I9000 using Gamerz ROM v1.3
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] dark_knight35:
All? Some device trees, that's all about it. AOKP is more than a pink unicorn.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] darkknigh_t:
Its a slim bean issue it will be fixed in the new version of GamerzRom :)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] dark_knight35:
Buggy garbage UI features? What about some more respect? At least it's the ROM you're using as base. When Slim is that bad, why did you choose it? Furthermore, when it comes to UI and features, Slim is by far the best. Might be that some elements aren't mature and a bit buggy, yet you don't have to enable them. When you know how to make things 'FASTEST', why don't you use pure AOSP as base? And to the fact that CM is the fastest ROM, how else should it be when a huge group of developers are working for years on it? It's obvious that nothing else can ever reach it. When I'd be a Slim Team member, next time somebody wants to base his ROM on my work, I might not say yes anymore. When it comes like that because of bad behaviour of some people, it would be really bad for some others who don't act like that. You are talking much about your 'legendary' ROM, but I can't see much action. Something that I saw was that you theme the widget's background of some apps, rename them and even change the credits sometimes. That's (following word used as I don't know a milder one for it in English) anti-social.

This post isn't meant to be offensive, it should just make you think about things, I know that you're indeed a good developer, but this just had to be said.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] burakgon:
1- I respect mnazim

2- Slim is not bad but buggy

3- AOSP is slower than CM. Even bluetooth won't work without modification. (Check webkit sources if you wonder too much.)

4- Framework is not everything. We need to edit quicktitle settings but pie, navigation bar etc is pretty useless for this device.

5- What you know about my GamerzROM Manager? It's much better than you can imagine. Just trying to build a fast and stable base to hold it.

That's why I wait for months.

Edit: About small modifications, they making the look more elegant. People likes it. I don't spend time on these.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] bobo1337:
I think that BEST way to do this is that u make a vote...like aways.add few sources and wich get most votes put it as build source.Sorry for my really bad english. :)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] iulian vu:
Supernexus is Aosp . and is the fastest Rom ! How you can say that CM or Aokp is Faster .They Are lazy , compare with Supernexus or Xylon ( Aosp too)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] darkknigh_t:
Whats the problem here burakgon is making his rom the way he wants it and why should we vote? He knows better then us cause i don't see any of us making any wonderful roms like this :)

burakgon you are an amazing person for doing this and sharing it with us thank you and keep up the good work :)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] saszseb:
I've never had any of connection issues on SB or other ICS/JB ROMs, either.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] burakgon:
Than you never used it. There is a known bug about USB connection.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] saszseb:
After more hundred ROM-flash I've used it sometimes. And testing the newest SB I use it because of logcat, etc. Never had bluetooth issue on SB. Yes, I read about bluetooth issue on SB thread, but those users were not familiar with bluetooth or any other things like "custom ringtones don't work", etc. If you follow your thread you have read some stupid posts like "it's a slim bug". No. It's a "user bug". Is SB buggy? I can't confirm it.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] dark_knight35:
1- That's good :).

2- Might be, I never looked at their sources that close, and tbh I don't think that someone like me can tell from that that a ROM is buggy, when it would be that easy, they would have already fixed it.

3- I have the same oppinion.

4- Idk what exactely you want to tell me with that, but CM added pie and Slim didn't, means a useless feature more on pie(and Slim has widget viewpager, what is very awesome to use in expanded desktop mode)

5- Again you start to get arrogant. But if you had read my post correctly, you would have seen that I actually said that you're a good developer, and I never criticized your app.

To your edit: Yes, the small modifications in form of nicer widget backgrounds and other theming stuff looks nice and is totally okay, but I'm refering to commits like this, where you change the name and displayed credits of an app that you didn't build by yourself. I know that you already removed Apollo, yet Andrew Neal

coded it and you can't change the author to your name(this looks like stealing apps, I know that this isn't your intention, but I'm sure that the app's creators would be pissed off, and you might get banned, so be happy that I hint that).
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Half Man Half Biscuit:
1st I have used all Slim Bean ROMs and actually i never had a buggy or slow ROM.

The guys that say it´s buggy,either are begginers that don´t Flash often or simply like in EVERY THREAD do a ****in

FULL WIPE

and you wont have problems,but it´s always can i Flash without wiping anything lol,you know what i mean ;)

I as saszseb said also can not confirm that SB is buggy,it is imho the smoothest ROM i have tried so far,seems guys can´t handle SB.

2nd Never have i experienced problems with Bluetooth either like saszseb said,on any ROM and i Flashed many ROMs (Though i´m not a freak like saszeb in Flashing hahaha little joke).

3rd I also flashed your ROM,it is nice and fast,but has a bug or 2 that really aren´t important imo,all in all it´s a great ROM.

4th As Darkster said if Slim Bean is so buggy like you posted,why did you use it as base then actually?
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] burakgon:
There is no word about bluetooth. :D Already it works fine. SlimBean is not stable like cyanogenmod that's reality. Why people declines it?
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] aways:
why comparing rom's i dont understand ?

some rom's not have to much feature and some rom's have to much feature

not much feature = more stable

to much featere = unstable...

2+2=4 you can't change it.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Ahmad_Ashraf:
Logic man

Respect :)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] burakgon:
Currently working on kernel. We need a kernel which is update and has 1400mhz+ oc support. Downloading cyanogenmod sources while working on it.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Haxxan7:
best rom ever

So far i have installed all the roms of Jellybean available in this forum for Gt-i9000.

This is the only rom i found that is stable for daily use and aslo for gaming,(my personal experience)

THANK YOU VERRY VERRY MUCH for giving us this great great rom.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Pao:
Any hope for a Devil with 1100 MHz overclock (No live OC)?

My phone is very unlucky for overclock and my maximum is that.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] burakgon:
Sorry I'm not planning it. But I'm very sure you can make %10 live oc. All Galaxy S phones can make 1200 mhz near stock voltages. Our CPU has 1200 mhz as default on wikipedia (now looks like 1000mhz there but it was)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Pao:
Meh, as I said my phone si veeeery unlucky. My limit is 1100 MHz or 105% Live oc
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] jaibar:
I apologize for the [Noobish][Q], but what's exactly the benefit of the OLED setting?

I can see that turning it on makes the black areas darker- sometimes too dark (for example in the keyboard I can barely see the small bluish signs).

But my question is whether turning it on or off can change the energy consumption of the AMOLED screen, or it is just cosmetics? I think that AMOLED really uses less energy with black colors, but more with white, or it is my missunderstanding?

Another [Noob][Q]: Any one experiences over heating with normal use? I would like to change kernel, is there a recommended one that works fine with this ROM version (which I really like one of the best I've flashed)...

Thanks!
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] EmDzei:
Crypting

Hi!

If crypting the phone, how I disable it? OK, installing the ROM again, but what folders I need to format? /system of course, but what else.

OK, you know me. ;) I already crypted the phone and do not like inputting all the time my PIN code.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] alifsaduri:
1-yes.black color will use less energy+cosmetic also..:)

2-i didn't experience over heating while using liveoc 116%.

Hi burakgon,

Have u play nova3 on this phone?i success to install it but the error come out with"ur phone is not compatible"..is it true?or i need to do some changes?
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] alb3rtt:
But dont use too much black because AMOLED screens are made using organic materials meaning they degrade over time. My white is now yellowish no matter what. My blue is greenish. I've got it looking less yellowish and less greenish via CMC (I tried Voodoo Colour but CMC is better for my display) but its still yellowish and greenish. My black is still black but i have burn ins in my display where the status bar is (noticable when i open the browser because it is white) and across the side from who knows where. AMOLED displays are nice but the degradation is bad.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] khaled_ksa_511:
Guys From where I change the (mhz) ?

And is it Dangerous if I change it?
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] blackbunny96:
Nice work we really need this ROM on Galaxy S Plus. Keed working
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] alb3rtt:
From NsTools or Devil tools.

Its dangerous if you put it crazy high like 1800mhz and your device cant handle it.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] khaled_ksa_511:
Thanks mate
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] alb3rtt:
@burak if you change bases, could you keep the real dark slim feature? It looks so good.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] ts1506:
I have been using black backgrounds and colourful images etc. My phone is 2.5 years old and my colours are all accurate.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] darkknigh_t:
Must be just a bad display that he has well a new one is not that expensive :)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] alb3rtt:
You are so lucky. You have an inand i9000 that can do 130% liveoc and has a perfect screen. Mine can do 120% but only on semaphore, its movinand and the screen is pretty bad now. It still looks good but not as good compared to when i first got it. My whites are definitely ruined though, my blues could be saved by tweaking CMC but i cant get it perfect.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] ts1506:
I am iNAND , but mine doesnt do 130% Live OC. In order to get each 130% benchmark , my phone crashes , hard reboots atleast 7-8 times.

My stable max is about 116-117% or so.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] :
This thread is about gamerzrom development, not about your personal overclock values and amoled degradation.

kthxbye.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] pbecks1963:
(Just my 2cents)

I am on a movinand. Stable oc = 124% with semaphore.

Verstuurd van mijn GT-I9000 met Tapatalk
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] :
you sir, are an
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] screamwork:
When will 2.0 be released???
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] :
is it announced?

what are you expecting on the 2.0 version.

please explain.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] alb3rtt:
It is announced FYI. It will be CM Based and Burak is working on it. However he did break one of the most important rules in XDA, NO ETA'S!!1!1!!!

---------- Post added at 12:31 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:23 AM ----------

He's a what? Don't resort to name calling, he probably just didn't see your post so chill out. I have done mistakes like that before and I bet you have too.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] :
...i gnorant

™
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] farfalk:
Hello! After my tenth post I can finally thank you for this incredible rom. I couldn't get 1.3 to completely work, but 1.2 was already amazing. I really can't wait for 2.0 - in the meantime, I've been advertising you a bit :p

1400+ MHz support? Really are there so many devices that support such a high OC? D:

Will you build a completely new kernel or, like the great Cyancore, will you tweak an existing one?
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] screamwork:
Yep, in his Facebook page.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] screamwork:
If I flashed a nightly cm10.1 and installed lots of apps; will I be able to upgrade to GamerzRom 2.0 without any wipe??
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] burakgon:
Yes you can.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] khaled_ksa_511:
music app don't work "bug"
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Famzz:
Well, even though i recommended that you use slim as base, I won't complain about you switching the base to Cyanogenmod. I myself can see slim 4.2 is just not as bug-free as slim 4.1 was. All-in-all it's for the sake of the ROM.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] daevoq:
Italian language works well on slim bean ;)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] burakgon:
Because you are using version 3. Mine is from latest soueces. Anyway I'm leaving it.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] 7kartoon:
Hellybean

I know that Hellybean has CM as base and it's incredible. It also uses the Devil Kernel. IMO the best kernel.

The latest release of the ROM (10th April) is amazing. I am sure that if things from that ROM and GamerzROM

get together we will have the Wonder ROM :p

Thank you anyway.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Driv:
Slimbean has so many bugs..... Sometimes i cant launch an App, the icon just glows blue (sides) but nothing happens, than i have to reboot my phone. Very annoying
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] DerRomtester:
Yeah thats why i switched to cm10.1 with devil. Waiting for new cm10.1 Gamerzrom .

Burak you are right cm10.1 is really fast now.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] darkknigh_t:
I'm so excited for the new release I can't wait it's going to be amazing :)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Famzz:
I have that bug as well and I hate it!! The only fix is to reboot. Can't wait for the cm10.1 version.

AWESOMENESSS! Press thanks is I helped you.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] bambam1978:
+1

Sent from my GT-I9000 using Xparent Green Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] malcriado:
When new version? I want to format my i9000.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] burakgon:
I tested S4 launcher and new chrome browser. They are new defaults of GamerzROM.

I browsed some heavy sites on chrome. They loading fast. And after tuening back to tw launcher, it wasn't redrawing. So they have my heart now. I won't make my rom pure S4 like. I will take beauty of s4 and aosp. (Still holo theme with a few tweaks and s4 wallpapers, launcher and accuweather.)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] burakgon:
headshot
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] darkknigh_t:
That looks amazing great job cant wait to try it out :D
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] malcriado:
Chrome has a problem no exit button.

But maybe you can have the programmer option "hold back to exit"
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] burakgon:
Than hold back to exit. :D
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] screamwork:
But opening drawer in S3's launcher was a bit laggy, is it on S4's?

---------- Post added at 09:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:49 PM ----------

Oh and please focus in battery's draining it'd be annoying to have a wonderful ROM that dies in less than 4 hours of continues usage :/
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] arthur93:
Does chrome has flash support?

Sent from my GT-I9000Brazil!
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] khaled_ksa_511:
This is my problem

+1
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] malcriado:
Thanks!
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] burakgon:
You got 4 hours screen-on battery. Nothing will make it 5 hours. Maybe 4.30.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] ts1506:
Chrome size is over 20mb, whereas the browser is 1.5mb, isn't this gonna increase ROM size a lot.

Sent from my cyanogenized tab 10.1
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Avesh10:
Also having the same problem of unresponsiveness of apps.

and having issues with network some time i lost my network and IMEI also...i am facing since i flashed previously thinkbridge (by aways).

had flash this rom with full wipe.

Any solution.?
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] alb3rtt:
Try flashing a modem (JVU, JW4, JVT are good in most places), that might fix it but if it doesnt, then do this.

Flash Stock GB, backup your imei and come back to Gamerzrom and flash a modem (any modem, JVU, JW4 and JVT, etc).

---------- Post added at 02:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:57 PM ----------

Chrome gives me horrible performance. The stock browser is the best browser for me (lightweight and fast). Dolphin is fastest for me but takes up a lot of space.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] arjiegodz:
whats faster. this or cyanaosp?
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] gverma1:
My two cents: I have stock browser for 95% of my browsing, opera mini for low bandwidth browsing, Firefox (for flash support as this is the only browser that supports flash now) and Photon browser (for flash support even though it is not a full blown browser).
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] gaz41:
Have you try Boat browser?

Inviato dal mio Galaxy S
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] burakgon:
OK, I give up about chrome. S4 launcher is cool. Please give up old bug reports. New base will be much better.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] bedeegc:
Just a suggestion for the browser, it is NOT a personal wish. But i tried now for a while LIGHTNING BROWSER (its free)

And i must say, it has a lot of options....when you work with google.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] 7kartoon:
Stock browser supports flash player.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Driv:
Can someome help me ?:s

I cant play Videos (APP,Browser)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Ahmad_Ashraf:
I reflashed big men libs and it worked I don't know why although it is included in the rom I get this issue so much on all KB roms
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] gverma1:
On mine it doesn't. If you have flash installed, click on its icon (its called flash settings). You will be prompted to select a browser if you have more than one installed. Select stock browser. If it shows you settings in the browser then it supports flash else it doesn't. You could check the same by selecting Firefox also.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] burakgon:
Flash working on 2.0 out of box. No need for a seperate browser for flash.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] ts1506:
If you dont mind, please use the stock lockscreen handle instead of the s logo.

Sent from my dad's stocky i9300 sgs3
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] burakgon:
Why mate. It's different and cool. :D But ok.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] k4z1k:
I found lock screen with "S" looks better:D
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Pao:
Yeah! :) It's better.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] ts1506:
Ah I have no issues, cause I know how to change it :D.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] m3talmike:
I agree, it's good as it is now!
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] ts1506:
True bro , S4 launcher is much better than the S3 one. I just tried it out , and it was smooth enough , and the lag while opening app tray is almost gone now.

Only lag is the widget tray (in starting , then it goes okay).

And touchwiz + aosp icons looks very good.

EDIT: It seems that the leaked Touchwiz from S4 is actually a modded S3 one.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] malcriado:
We still waiting.

I'm very excited, cmon.

:D
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] screamwork:
I'm feeling sorry for myself flashing other ROMs lol.. C A N ' T W A I T ;D
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] kogli:
Can't wait for new releases! Keep up the good work Burakgon :)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] burakgon:
(2.0) new release will be today if no problems.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Ahmad_Ashraf:
Good luck :)
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Famzz:
YAY. Im on cm waiting for v2.0. I pretty sure there will be no problems.

AWESOMENESSS!!! Press thanks if I helped you!!!
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Ahmad_Ashraf:
Just wanted to ask a question

Can we include 3.0.72 changes in a gb kernel :thumbup:
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] ts1506:
No.

Some dev did make a 3.0.8 kernel for CM7 for i9000 , but most features didnt work on that one , due to incompatibility issues.
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] Driv:
problem ?
[Galaxy S I9000 Android Development] burakgon:
No, even I'm making a build machine for GamerzROM. It will make new builds with one click. This will return back you as instant updates.

I will continue building GamerzROM build machine and new release GamerzROM 2.0 and upload it live now. Wait for TeamViewer ID if you wan't to see what I'm doing.