yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] ChungWingKeung:
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?...22274739520.93222.118274534520&type=1&theater

[03/04/2013] ASUS Transformer Pad TF700T FOTA v10.6.1.14.4

*請於更新前備份重要資訊

更新內容：

‧更新 Android 4.2 Jelly Bean系統 (android 4.2 upgrade)

‧支援 多帳戶功能 (高達4個帳戶) (multi-accounts)

‧支援 螢幕鎖定小工具 (4.2 lockscreens)

‧新增 兩種主頁模式 (平板模式及手機模式) (2 kinds of homescreen)

‧新增 休眠模式選項 - ASUS螢幕保護程式 (add "sleep")

‧新增 Parental Lock 家長監控功能 (支援遙遠監控) (parental lock)

English version:

http://translate.google.com.tw/

SO are we going to get update soon:confused:
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] Thom4s:
What im wondering is why it is so hard to support multiple devices. Is the hardware in a t300, tf700 and tf201 that different? I think it is really bad for the customer that roms have to be made specificaly for each product. I really like the ibm/pc platform for how i can run windows 7 fine on my 7 year old toughtbook. And it actually runs faster then most of my client's modern pcs full of crapware.
[Asus  Eee Pad Transformer Prime] TrekMD:
Let's hope so. :)
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] budney:
Every time I try to cook a 3.17.03 ENG O2-Euro ROM using the SD method the last few days it comes back saying "ROM Creation Error. Click here to see the log.". And when I "click here to see the log" it says the fallowing:</p>

./mkrom.sh: ../../kitchen.local/mkrom-inc.sh: No such file or directoryno files for configid 26220739Cannot fit files in given sectionsError splitting files</p>

Also when I try the .exe method it finishes, and I can download it. But when I run it, there is a "ERROR 007 NO ROM IMAGE FILE" Cannot find the ROM image to upgrade your Pocket PC. Please download and try again.</p>

Any help would be appreciated. Thanx</p>
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] pdhenry:
No problems here making a zipped NK.nb1.

What configuration were you trying to make?
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] LumpiStefan:
Looks like there is a problem with the operaor Config Data......

Maybe cooking without Autoconfigdata will work fine.

Just try it...

HTH

Stefan
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] budney:
pdhenry & LumpiStefan thank you for the replies. I have tried to cook a ROM w/ & w/o auto config. & using .exe & SD methods, and it didn't help. I just tried it again w/o auto config., and got the same error. :?
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] tiluc:
Hi there,

YEs I'm getting the same problem with the Kitchen.javascript:emoticon(':?:') javascript:emoticon(':idea:')
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] tiluc:
Hi everybody,

I tried many things to find a solution(w/without firewall, different browser) but so far, I'm getting the same message and the same result.

/mkrom.sh: ../../kitchen.local/mkrom-inc.sh: No such file or directoryno files for configid 26220739Cannot fit files in given sectionsError splitting files

Any others people who got the same message in the past?

Thanks,

:roll: :roll: :roll:
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] tiluc:
Hi Budney,

HAve you found any solution yet?

Could you tell me what are you using as browser?

Cheers,
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] pdhenry:
Wow. I'm still not having problems. :? Running IE6 on windows XP (don't know what effect the browser would have - sounds like it would be a problem on the kitchen side).

Last night I cooked a vanilla 3.17.03 ROM, this morning a 4.00.16 ROM without problems. I didn't try to download and save them, but mkrom ran and completed normally in both instances.
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] budney:
tiluc - I am still having the same problem with cooking 3.17.03 ROMs. I think pdhenry is right, it's on the kitchen side. :(

pdhenry - I am running what you are XP & IE6. Were those ROMs you cooked .exe or SD? As the 3.17.03 .exe ROMs will complete, but when I run them I get that 007 ERROR meesage.
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] pdhenry:
They were SD roms, and I didn't try downloading/installing them - just runnng the kitchen until it told me it was finished.
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] budney:
Lucky you. :D But lucky for me I did get two ROMs completed, they were on the plain side though. Right after I tried the first plain ROM I tried two more ROMs with a lot programs in them, but they both didn't work. I then tried another plain ROM, and it worked. So I would think that it's one of the programs that is messing up the ROMs. :?
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] pdhenry:
That would be consistent with the "no such file or directory" messages you're getting. I guess it'stime for some experimenting... :wink:
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] sharkhan:
I remeber a thread telling that you have to leave a certain amount of memory free when you cooking the ROM, I think it was around 200 KB or so. Try to uncheck some add-on software to keep, let's say 250 KB free (see the info next to green bar) and try again. It should work with any of the ROM versions.
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] budney:
sharkhan - I think you are correct. As I just tried cooking one up & left 250 KB open, and it was successful. :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] thunderx2000:
I like CyanogenMod 10.1 a lot more than I like Touchwiz. I don't know why, though. So here is my question. Is there a way to get CM10.1 to recognize The AT&T Galaxy Note 2 as SGH-i317 instead of GT-N7105? I've seen it in videos where someone is using the Galaxy Note 2 with CM10.1 and it is recognized as SGH-i317. I just need a little help, because it bugs a little to see GT-N7105.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] NightHawkUndead:
Change your build.prob
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] thunderx2000:
Tried that. Still recognized it as GT-N7105.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Kreateablaze:
Why does it matter? But if it does just flash the sons of android rom. It's aosp. And will recognize it as an att phone
[HTC Sensation] TTime_007:
Hi,

Is there some awesome person who could port this to our Sensation??

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2211163

I like to test!!

Thanks
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] lanjor:
Hi all, sorry for make a new thread about this, but i try to search, but nothing came out.

The question :

I have original mhl adapter by samsung,

Back in ics day (stok rom), this adapter work flawlesly.

Then i think i tried to install custom rom on my note, trying some rom, PA (2 version), and carbon rom, the rom work very good and smooth, but the mhl adapter not work on above rom.

Can someone point me, which rom that work with samsung mhl adapter? Or may be all JB rom not compatible with mhl adapter?

Thanks for the answers guys and sorry about the languange, my english not too good :D

Sent from AlcoNexusDroid -Tapatalk2-
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] little-vince:
Basically only the official touchwizz JB roms by samsung will support TV out.

All cm, pa, carbon etc (all those you listed up there) will NOT work, as the sources for tv out don't exist.

I recommend this rom, cuz anything eybee releases is flawless.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] lanjor:
Re: [Q] JB ROM that support tv out via hdmi adapter

Yes... that what i mean :D sorry... didnt know the correct name,will edit the post.

And thanks for your answer will try that rom :)

Sent from AlcoNexusDroid -Tapatalk2-

------------------------------------------------------------------- edit

With Rocket rom its really working... :D thanks
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] Maxxd01:
Hello everyone,

I intend to buy a branded sim locked Xperia Go. It looks like that will bring Android 4.0.3/4.0.4, and the official 4.1 is now rolling out.

Question is, will I have problems upgrading to 4.1? As fair as I understand, if the Carrier does not release the 4.1, I have to apply it manually - and to apply it manually, I have to unlock my bootloader (I suppose) - which from the Sony tutorial it looks pretty simple.

Problem is, since my phone will be sim locked, is this going to be a problem?
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] bhartendra:
no its not a problem at all.......and also sim lock are easily breakable at any mobile repairing shop:D
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] XperianPro:
Can you explain that?
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] doctor_droid:
+1

:D

That was anything

@ bhartendra- its not simlock what u thought of (forgetting sim password :D)

Its that phone is locked to a particular carrier (which cant be undone at any mobile repairing shop)
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] Maxxd01:
Now that this is cleared, can anyone please answer my question :D
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] Maxxd01:
Anyone?
[HTC One X] rwhelan:
Hi Everyone,

My notification bar at the top of the screen will not pull down. It suddenly stopped working. I am running the vemon viper x 3.3.7 rom on a htc one x. I have restarted the status bar, cleared caches and dalvik cache but nothing seems to work. It seem as if it is a setting. Anyone have any ideas???
[HTC One X] Mr Hofs:
What if you reflash the rom with only a cache/dalvik cache wipe ?
[HTC One X] DelBoy:
You are not using 3rd party launcher that can disable notification bar?
[HTC One X] rwhelan:
Ya will do, thought there might be another way instead re-flashing the rom
[HTC One X] rwhelan:
No, standard laucher with vemon viperx.
[HTC One X] Mr Hofs:
Did you try this :

Set an option in venom tweaks that concerns the statusbar, press reboot statusbar after that .....Maybe that's enough ?
[HTC One X] Amz95:
Yes I had same problem on CM10.1, restarting System UI fixed the problem.
[HTC One X] Naszmin:
mine problem solve after reboot on viperx 3.4.2....
[LG Optimus Black] wessyh0:
Hi, I really like the way app opens and close in Android 4.2. Is there anway to get this on stock ICS? Thanks
[LG Optimus Black] dcop7:
If you use Nova launcher, you can choose that.
[LG Optimus Black] wessyh0:
Tried that, but it has no effect ^^.
[LG Optimus Black] ferhpsquad:
On IZS, there is a way here
[LG Optimus Black] cookiepuppy:
tried this on marvel v12 beta, works fine but as some of those replies on that thread, its slow and feels like no matter what changes you make, in developer option scale animation and that stuff, its still to slow.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] RedGround:
I followed the steps on this guide:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1914394

Can't get ClockworkRecovery to install. Whenever I try, Odin gives the mesages:

Information about phone:

Model number: GT-I9305

Android Version: 4.1.2

Baseband version: I9305BVBLL2

Kernel version: 3.0.31-746372 se.infra@SEP-122 #1

SMP PREEMPT Wed Dec 26 09:19:59 KST 2012

But the original Samsung i9305 recovery menu stays the same.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TheMrcool212:
Make sure you are in the download mode
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Lookin4somehelp:
He's defiantly in download mode, otherwise odin wouldn't have given those results
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tchindalia:
Hey

1.What were the settings on Odin when u installed it??

2.Does your device automatically reboot into recovery mode and apply the changes??

If it doesn't you might want to access it manually after the installation..

Sent from my GT-I9300..!
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] blackhand64:
Install Team Win recovery instead

1. Install Goo Manager from play store

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.s0up.goomanager

2. Open and press menu key

3. Select install OpenRecoveryScript

4. Make sure it has the correct recovery for your device and press OK and it will download and install Team Win recovery automatically

5. If you want to make sure it installed just reboot into recovery (power, volume up, home)

6. All done :)
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] AndroidPlant:
Download ROM Manager from the Play Store and flash CWM Recovery to your device. If need further assistance, PM me.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] killbubble:
R: Can't get ClockworkRecovery to install.

None of the other answers are better than this one. Follow this OP.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] AndroidPlant:
Glad to help. ROM Manager is probably the best you'll find out there.

AndroidPlant

An everyday user.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] killbubble:
R: Can't get ClockworkRecovery to install.

Thou i feel, even thou it is not more stable, philz recovery is overall better. It can skip md5 checksum, compress backups and free up to more than 1gb of space, it can have it's own aroma file manager....pretty neat...but not for the op i guess, he probably is looking for stability
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Glebun:
no, don't use ROM manager, it has issues with the S3
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] AndroidPlant:
Mine worked fine. What issues?

AndroidPlant

An everyday user.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] killbubble:
R: Can't get ClockworkRecovery to install.

No issues whatsoever. I dont use it to download roms or stuff (goo manager is better, even better is going to get em manually) i use it for what is necessary: updating/installing clockworkmod. It works just fine with s3...maybe ur rom is unstable....;)
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Glebun:
I'm not speaking from experience here, that's just what I heard from multiple experienced users and it seems that it's not recommended to use on this phone
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] killbubble:
Nonsense, it doesnt even have multiple cell options like on the s2 u had to choose not knowing which was the correct model. On the s3, only one phone(no doubles): works great.

Whoever told you it doesnt work was just total air....
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] Dr.Hosam:
Hello guys just want to ask if UVLH stock kernel can work on UVLE1 custome rome and thank you,in advance
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] jrosetto:
You are referring to the radio UVLH1. The latest radio is UVLI4 but you can run either of them with any rom.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] Dr.Hosam:
Thank you for answering , so I understood that I can use uvlh kernel with any ics rom like jedi mind trick right ?
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] zxstyle07:
That's the radio. Not kernel....
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mhrsolanki2020:
Hello,

I have an SD card that was working just fine .

But i then tried to mount it to my pc with the card reader and then it did detect it but gave an error that THE SYSTEM TYPE is not recognized, and then gave me an option to format it.

So i googled and read threads on XDA and found out that the

CHKDSK

This command would help me in recovering the files from my dead sd card.

But it gave me a error

[B][I][COLOR="Red"]C:\Windows\system32>chkdsk g: /r
The type of the file system is RAW.
CHKDSK is not available for RAW drives.[/COLOR][/B][/I]

The data in the sd card is real important.

Can please someone help me with the same ?
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] przjan:
Is there a way to monitor stuff like battery/cpu/memory usage of my Galaxy S3 on PC while the phone is connected via usb cable?

What i mean is that id like to see the indicators on my pc screen, NOT on Galaxy.
[Upgrading, Modifying and Unlocking] kane14:
http://www.smartphoneminds.com/mods/board_news/newsitem.php?id=20

check it out..
[Galaxy S 4 General] da.trute:
I currently have the S3, i have previously owned the S2 and S1 and was hoping for a simply upgrade process again, Sammy bring out a storming phone, I buy it and nobody else gets a look in.

However tsamsung have overcomplicated what should have been an easy decision to the point when I am now considering a HTC one, crazy I Know. The HTC one is a beauitiful looking phone and it is pretty much as powerful as the snap S4 600 so why shouldnt I buy it?, this is where sammy has failed to me, they let HTC get in on the high end.

However, the Ones's screen for me isnt even as good as my s3's, the colours are much richer and the blacks blacker, no contest for me (personal Taste).

So with the one out of the window do I wait for the Octa or get the 600 version, I just cant decide, will I really me missing something if I get the 600 version?
[Galaxy S 4 General] MoshuXXL:
Since you posted in S4 forum I think you unconsciously already made a decision. The most answers here will be biased towards S4 (mine included). If you really wanted HTC One you'd posting there. :D
[Galaxy S 4 General] da.trute:
I your read I have already kind of ruled out the One, i just cant decide whether I should go 600 or wait for the OCta.
[Galaxy S 4 General] Hironimo:
Both are good phones and at this point I think the choice is even more (compared to other comparisons where the race was not this close) about personal preference than which phone is better.

If you are talking about samsung offering different processors which complicates things, maybe my thoughts help:

- Unless you make the effort of importing a foreign phone at increased cost you typically do not have the choice between the I9505 and the I9500. You get the one samsung chose for the region (the i9505 for the US and central Europe), at least for the next few months (for me it's just speculation if/when the Exynos gets available genarally).

- Both pocessors are decent and I think for most users it makes no real difference. They would likely not notice the difference. The Exynos seemes to have an edge in speed and possibly battery life, but also consider that the snapdragon is more open and developers are more willing and able to develop/optimize for it. And since the snapdagon will be more wide-spread you'll also find more roms for it (assuming the rom's will only work on the model they are built for).

- It is not that Samsung created the 'choice' of processors willingly, they are forced to it since they cannot produce enough Exynos processors to meet the demands. If they could, Samsung would only use it's own Exynos.

If you meant other aspects that make the choice for difficult for you, please go ahead and mention them :)
[Galaxy S 4 General] Mittaa:
+1
[Galaxy S 4 General] MoshuXXL:
If you don't have LTE in your country or is just too damn expensive (like in my country) and you don't care to much about custom development then go for the Exynos because it will be probably cheaper and possibly better in performance/battery. Otherwise go for the Snapdragon.
[Galaxy S 4 General] resore:
Im a bit investigating similar topic so maybe I will help you somehow. Basically it looks like this:

- htc one is a great looking phone with top-notch lcd display and it will be probably the area you will love

- performance wise - htc looks average, s4 lte seems to have better ram and is overclocked, octa is expected to be benchmark king. octa is full a15 architecture but a bit old overclocked GPU

- if you like sense - new sense looks different. well sense 5 looks interesting but it seems it eats standby time and for me is a first feature to be disabled. I use nova + my set of widgets/apps so basically I dont give a f*** if its a sense or TW based firmware

- htc seems to be fragile and difficult to repair. top and bottom panels drops off quite often, aluminium body is not so hard and can be broken/dented

- screen in htc is smaller but as I said its a top lcd screen for now (there is a topic that htc use different screen suplier with quite different brighness/color setup) - some screens look poor

- if you like amoled or you are used to amoled - you will notice poor black in htc and probably also notice better brightness in s4 (around 25%-30% more than s3)

- qualcomm SOC seems to be prefered platform for now so if you are CM lover, it looks like the only choice. Exynos is the worst enemy of entropy512 so dont expect much of teamhacksung

- exycon is supposed to have wolfson DAC, but s600 is getting great sound reviews too. Htc one seems to be really well configured in audio department

- battery wise - htc one has smaller battery, smaller lcd screen which means better browsing time. s4 has bigger batter, bigger amoled screen but suprisingly similar browsing time and great stand by time

- base on s3/hox experience - htc looks pretty bad in soft update area but it doesnt mean htc one will have to wait years for 4.2. if htc one+ will apear in following 3 months - expect crap soft updates ;)

- button layouts - if you are galaxy user, expect frustration in two-buttons HTC setup. Only back on the left and home on the right with useless giant htc label in the middle

- htc - no sd card and no battery. I basically watch movies/tv series and play games in free time beside usual stuff so no sd card is a no go. Big screen + sd card is a must have

- octa seems to be a lot more interesting, bit.LITTLE can be tweaked to operate on 8 cores, can be separately overclocked on a7/a15 cores - sounds like a lot of fun

these are just some subjects that I noticed and I may be totally wrong
[Galaxy S 4 General] da.trute:
Dont get me wrong its going to be an S4, my friend sat next to me at work has a ONE and the screen is nice but isnt as nice as my Galaxy S3 in my humble opinion.

If I knew how long I'd have to wait to get my hands on the OCTa, lte or not in the UK then I might be able to make a decision, hence why i feel Sammy has dropped the ball her for high end users.
[Galaxy S 4 General] jack_slapped:
I wonder which will get more development. The international version or the US version. I know there are some ROMs that are only available for the international version of the S3.

Sent from uber hacked GS3
[Galaxy S 4 General] -]Megacharge[-:
I would stick with the S600 variant S4. More development and the enhanced Adreno 320 is proving to be a beast. If I decided to get an S4 it would be hands down the S600 for me.
[Galaxy S 4 General] da.trute:
it has been suggested that there will be more Dev on the 600 version as there will be more of them which makes sense, however I always use tweaked sammy based ROMS rather new DEV stuff like cyanogen than so there will be more than enough Dev on the OCTA for me.
[Galaxy S 4 General] pack21:
Unfortunately i have to understand S4 S600 LTE version is more complete than Exynos without LTE.

At moment here we pay in any plane more €10\month to have 4G with extra 3Gb, but I think sooner or later 4G will be free.

Between have a slightly higher value in bench's i'd rather buy a phone that will not let me down on LTE question.

Conclusion:

With LTE i have a much faster phone than a higher bench without LTE ... looool

Now with this in mind in can buy a S4 S600 in peace with Sam.:D

.
[Galaxy S 4 General] ilabs:
The main issue for me will be when Sammy stops updating the S4 maybe 1.5-2 years down the line. The S4 has great hardware and should run well into 3 years of use, and the only thing that will keep it updated is dev support and aosp/aosp-derivative ROMs. I'll wait till i decide which variant to buy depending on how open each variant turns out to be for dev-work.

Was wondering if starting a petition this time might help. Before, petitions were started after people bought the phones so sammy already made the sale. This time, it could mean a loss of customers for sammy if they don't release complete and updated code and documentation.
[Galaxy Tab 2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jmajuri1:
i have a new att sgh-i497. I want to make the stock tar.md5 so if I make a mistake i can use odin to restore it. How does a noob do this?

I have no custom recovery. its a total stock device. I am also trying to host it for all the members who have a soft bricked att sgh-i497.

also do i need to factory reset it first?
[Galaxy Tab 2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] squ89r97:
just typed in google - how to make odin flashable dump

bought up a few suggestions you may want to mull over. looks like you might need to be rooted first though.
[Galaxy Tab 2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Oditius:
Looks like a lot to do. But near the bottom of the first post, it a stock recovery incase you mess up

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2101044
[Galaxy Tab 2 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jmajuri1:
that is the rom every one says does not work. it shuts off your wifi and lte. i am trying to get my stock firmware off my tab. i want to host for all the poeple who soft bricked their att sgh-i497s. i cant find the stock firmnware any where.