yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] .AndroiD.:
iv'e seen the repart.img everywhere and always it does not work

i get a red X and it shutsdown

my nook is not powering on unless i pun in it my cm7 SDcard... means my internal is empty

i want to go back to stock, and this is the only way, and it does not work

is there a soulotion?
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] digixmax:
You can try Succulent's flash_stock_1.4.2.zip posted at https://github.com/succulent/acclaim_recovery_sdcard.
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] datallboy:
If you get the red x during the repart it's usually a sign one of the internal partitions could be messed up. Not always the case though. Maybe it's the version you were flashing.

Did you try changing the internal partitions in any way? During the process of SD boot did you use the zip file that had SD boot setup?
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] .AndroiD.:
it does not allow me to download it

i'll be honest, it used to be a device for develop only... it got messed up somehow and i got it like that... i really dont know what they have done to it..

im sure theres a way to fix this, i just dont understand nothing in NT

i rememberd that a few weeks ago i got it worked and installed MIUI on the internal, so i guess it is not a lost fight
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] datallboy:
Well if all you care about is android jelly bean just use and SD image.

http://iamafanof.wordpress.com/2012/11/18/cm10-0-jellybean-sdcard-img-for-nook-tablet/

Its simple to use, just write the image to an SD card and you're good.

Stock bn sucks, a lot in my opinion. I expected so much more when I bought it. Reason why I run an SD image. If you want nook books just download the app from Google play.
[Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet] digixmax:
You can download the whole folder (the bulk of it size-wise is the 1.4.2 stock ROM zip file) by clicking on the "ZIP" tab.

You might find some helpful info at http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=37515697&postcount=31.
[MDA, XDA, 1010 General] monika69:
wm2003 built-in functionality allows only for making a choice between - ring, vibrate and silence/silent ... no other option allowed

I would prefer to have one additional feature allowing for a/m - useful especially in noisy environment

any ideas ???

regards, monika
[MDA, XDA, 1010 General] Rudegar:
not sure if i'm barking up the wrong tree here but

are you talking about when you choose using the icon

on the today screen or inside the phone settings in control panel ?

if you cant choose both in the phone settings in control panel then they changed it since 2002 not sure
[MDA, XDA, 1010 General] LumpiStefan:
You have to configure it at Start->Control-Panel -> Phone.

Here you can say vibrate and ring.

Why aren't you playing little bit with your phone? It isn't very difficult to get this settings by your own...

Regards

Stefan
[MDA, XDA, 1010 General] monika69:
[/quote]

You have to configure it at Start->Control-Panel -> Phone.

Here you can say vibrate and ring.

Why aren't you playing little bit with your phone? It isn't very difficult to get this settings by your own...

Regards

Stefan[/quote]

ok, let me re-phrase to make sure all do understand :? I want that icon on today screen, that one that regulates the volume which is next to GSM signal reception, and not inside the XDA ... to keep it simple

regards
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] hydromax:
Have a TouchWiz with CM10.1 can use?

Thanks answers..
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] ashish.kmc08:
Buddy touchwiz can't be used with cm 10.1....adam is developing stock jb wanamlite rom... So keep an eye on that forum...
[Samsung Galaxy R i9103] hydromax:
very thanks.
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] desiremhtc:
Hi,

When the (HTC Desire) phone is powered up it is unable to mount the SD card, and I am unable to have it mounted from the "Settings > SD card & Storage" menu. Having said that, the micro SD card can be accessed from a computer (when plugged in directly to the computer, i.e. no issue with the card), and moreover, when I am in the recovery mode, I can have it mounted and browse it. By the way, the card could be accessed from the phone until I downgraded the O/S, and managed to have it rooted.

When the phone is running normally, and connected to the USB port of a laptop, the laptop does recognize a device connected (can even do ADB), but I believe because the SD card is not mounted, the phone does not offer the option to make the card appear as a disk drive for computer access.

I am running the original (RUU, Telstra) Android 2.2 (2.26.841.2) on a HTC desire, after I had it "S-OFF'ed". After reloading the original 2.2, I had it rooted.

The micro SD card is a 2GB one, with approx 1.5GB formatted as FAT16 (contains typical file and photos), and 0.5 GB as EXT3 (contains nothing at the moment).

HBoot: 6.93.1002

S-Off (thanks to Revolutionary)

Recovery mode: ClockworkMod v5.0.2.0 (I manually loaded it)

I have searched online for solutions, and have not been able to have it fixed. Others seem to have different issues to that of mine. Usually, they cannot mount the SD-card at all (not even from recovery), or their SD card just needed to be reformatted. I think I have indicated that these do not appear to be relevant to my issue at all. I have also tried "Fastboot oem enableqxdm 0", and it made no difference.

I look forward to your kind responses and feedback.

Thank you for your attention.
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] nikwen:
Welcome to the forum. :)

I had the same problem once. The solution is very simple but annoying: Many Android phones are unable to mount SD cards formatted with tools like MiniTool Partition Wizard. Reformat the SD card using CWM (ClockWorkMod) recovery and everything will be fine. :D

Good luck. ;)
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] desiremhtc:
It worked

Dear friend,

Thank you so much for your simple tip. It worked! I felt so dumb for not trying it out myself. I guess I was tired of trying things without considering moving my data back and forth. Once more thank you.
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] nikwen:
AW: [Q] Phone doesn't mount SD-Card, but I can mount it in the recovery mode

Well, this IS annoying. I had the same problems and copied my data three times (~ 12 GB). So I can understand that. ;)
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] B15Q:
Good evening,

I have also the same prroblem.

Is there any manual - instructions that I could follow in order to solve the issue with the CWM?

Thanks in advance.
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] quinten96:
So I installed cyanogenmod today. I actually reinstalled it after having problems with it for a while but since the reinstall hasn't fixed it I finally decided to just ask it :).

So.. The problem is that it seems that my memory is read only. I only use internal memory (I've got an xperia T) since it is big enough for me atm. It has like 5Gb of space free but whenever I try to download something using the webbrowser app it says that it is unable to download because "no name". Another problem is that I can't download from dropbox neither and when I try to take a screenshot of my screen it can't save it.

Now I have read that cyanogemod reserves space for itself but im pretty sure it doesn't need 5gb of memory. So I guess I should make a virtual external sd or something but I don't know how and I am also not sure if it will fix the problems.

(keep in mind that downloading from the playstore does work)

Mod Edit
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] BreckZeBoulay:
Same issue with TX.

The only solution i found is formating the memory.

But before, backup the memory on your computer ^^
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] xrenoix:
format

It also puts arrives the internal sd formats badly is then to renomer 0 with differente permission instead of sdcard and especially not to remetter no Roma stock before having made a protection(saving) of your give because you cannot recuperer apres finally personally his(her,its) does not have to walk(work) I was to oblige to put back(to hand) a Roma cm for any recuperer! Desoler for my bad English
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] quinten96:
How do I format? through CWM?

I don't understand what you just said xD
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] xrenoix:
sorry for my bad english

You got back everything with no problem at all? Best it is from regulations then storage then to erase the internal memory !

traduction by http://www.reverso.net/

---------- Post added at 10:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:52 PM ----------

settings > storage >clear internal storage
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] quinten96:
any ideas?
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Mad Marty:
Format your SD again in CWM
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] dkownacki:
I think it is a problem with NTFS format, android not support it well. The best choice is Fat32 or EXT4. To get 100% working sdcard on android and via PC, format sd card in recovery
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] ryan_o_:
So, took the plunge and rooted my s3. Everything was fine until I installed Cyanogen from the Clockwork app. I rebooteed, and all of my apps were installing, but I didn't have any contacts. I had pictures, but not contacts. I synced them with my google account, but they aren't on there now. They aren't on Verizon either. So, I thought that I would flash my backup, sync them, and then flash Cyanogen again. Now, Clockwork won't read my backup. I backed it up on there and on Titanium. There's nothing in Titanium's folder and in the Clockwork backup it says "MD5 mismatch!". Also, some of the backups and other things say that they're from 1970 or 1969??? :eek: I'm a first time rooter, so does anyone have a fix?
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] resudo:
Not sure of this helps but go to contacts app, press menu button and click import from sim card.:)
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] ryan_o_:
Sorry, forgot to add that I did that, and it didn't work. I'm just worried about both backups not working...
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] mapatton82:
When you install CM did you install gapps as well?
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] ryan_o_:
Sorry, but what is gapps?
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] Watanuki-Kun:
Gapps is just flashable zip of the google apps like gmail, google play store etc. What is important to know is that without flashing Gapps you won't be able to add a google account to your phone thus no sync between your account and phone, which is why you do not have any contacts.

To help you out, here is the website to download it. http://goo.im/gapps

Just use the table to find which gapps flash zip you need. I assume you are using the latest cyanogen version, 10.1, so I suggest the 20130301 version.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] bigystyle84:
Hi All,

Running 4.2.2 AOSP buttery smooth with excellent battery life. Using SOA with SOAP and 240 density I'm getting as good of battery life as Touchwiz based Roms and Kernels.

I love me some AOSP any day over Touchwiz on my Note II EXCEPT:

I really miss the Touchwiz Camera app. I hate the 4.2 Camera App, even hated it on my Nexus 4 before I sold it for my Note II. I even feel like the image quality isn't quite as good.

I don't really want to flash back to a TW to test the camera, and have been searching for an answer. Does TW take better pics than AOSP as far as quality for the Note II? (I know HTC Sense cam app does vs AOSP on the One S/One X for example, so wondering if TW is similar)

For the AOSP users out there, how are you finding the camera app? Have you tried any 3rd party app's like Line Camera? What's the best solution for 3rd party apps?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] velveteen71:
I'm of the same opinion. I don't necessarily feel the quality of pics is any better, I just prefer the UI and bells and whistles.

This is an about-face for me, as far as the Sammy camera is concerned; on my previous Note and GS2, I didn't like it and always went with a different app (most recently the Camera 4.2). But now, with slo-mo, screenshots, pause, etc etc, I really like it.

My problem is (as noted in another thread on this Q&A board), that all of my video recordings have a "popping" sound on them, and I've done EVERYTHING to try and solve it to no avail.

I've moved on to CM10.1 nightlies and have no prob with the 4.2 camera.

I use alt s-pen apps, so I'm not really beholden to TW, but if my camera worked, I would have stayed.

One more note: I've just started using Snap Camera, which improves upon Camera 4.2, and so far so good.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] CodeNameRedNeck:
I have seen several of these threads, never posted on any of them but have seen several. The AOSP camera in my opinion does not take as good of pictures as the stock Samsung camera. The first thing I have noticed is that the pictures taken with the AOSP camera are not as clear or crisp as the TW camera. More noticeable when zoomed in. Secondly the file size of AOSP pictures is often times smaller than the TW file size. This could be just different information stored within the picture but I lean more to picture quality making up the size difference. I could be wrong. Lastly I know it is just my preference but I prefer the TW file naming format versus the AOSP file naming format.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] bigystyle84:
I am using the Camera and Video a lot right now as I'm a new father, so I'm going to switch back to a TW rom for first time in a while mostly for the Camera for testing and comparing.

I just flashed Jedi XP 12 and Saber Kernel
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] SeraldoBabalu:
the touchwiz camera app was fast with picture taking. was very quick when moments were there. does the aosp camera snap pics with the same speed?

i know when i was using my nexus 4, it was a slug compared to the note 2. probably wasn't any faster than taking pics with my galaxy s2.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Blue1k:
Try Camera FV-5

Fantastic SLR style app.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] bigystyle84:
Has anyone done or tried to do some actual comparisons between AOSP and TW cameras?

I'm basing this simply off my experience with the phone - I used CleanRom for quite a while, then went 4.2.2 (Rootbox then SOA), and now back to JediXP

Honestly- I miss Sons of Android - I love AOSP - but I still feel like the TW Cam takes better pics.

Am I making this up?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Ohh_Trenton:
Snap Camera is awesome FTW

Sent From My Custom Inverted VZW Note 2
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] velveteen71:
I agree that Snap Camera is great. Only one thing I noticed (And this may not be exclusive to Snap Camera, but maybe other AOSP apps):

I did a test to compare the quality of stock vs. Snap Camera. I couldn't discern any difference in quality, but I did notice that the stock app captures "more". What I mean is, I set the camera in the same position, taking identical pics of a box with both apps. The Snap Camera pic cut off the top of the box, but the stock app got the whole box in the picture. It's as though Snap C is slightly zoomed in, compared to stock. No, it wasn't zoomed in. Both were set at same settings, same focus, etc.

Anyway, aside from that, I think it's a great app too.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Tikiflame:
I was actually wondering if there would be any way to install the samsung camera into an aosp ?

Probably not possible. Just thought about it today. Because I like Liquid Smooth. But some things are not as functional as a tw rom. Like the camera.

I dont like the aosp stock camera it always locks up on me, so I will have to give these other cam apps mentioned above a try.

Good post and replys guys, thanks.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] raduque:
The AOSP camera app, probably isn't able to use all the advanced features of the camera hardware, because the driver is not open source and likely requires the Samsung framework. AOSP is using a basic driver that simply allows it to take picture, but it's not particularly good or useful.

IMO, AOSP is inferior to a TW/Nature UX rom. I would never use an AOSP rom on a Samsung phone. Just too many features I use would be missing, and I don't like the way AOSP looks.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] bigystyle84:
I definitly prefer everything AOSP over TW except the Camera

I am using a TW app though and the camera quality is better - to the point I will get used to TW.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] gilesknap:
TW vs AOSP Camera tests

QUOTE=bigystyle84;39957450]Has anyone done or tried to do some actual comparisons between AOSP and TW cameras?

I'm basing this simply off my experience with the phone - I used CleanRom for quite a while, then went 4.2.2 (Rootbox then SOA), and now back to JediXP

Honestly- I miss Sons of Android - I love AOSP - but I still feel like the TW Cam takes better pics.

Am I making this up?[/QUOTE]

My wife has a stock S3 and I am running Carbon ROM 1.7. I did some rudimentary testing and was suprised to find that the AOSP camera took slightly better shots. Close ups in good light had better contrast and colour realism than TW.

However I cannot get over the fact that AOSP clips the viewfinder to a widescreen format - it is impossible to frame a photo well because of this. In addition the camera crashes quite regularly and requires a reboot.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Bronyr:
hardly anyone mentions video - I currently have CM 10.1 and really like it but the camera/video is a deal breaker for me. Trying to take video renders them unusable because not only about the quality but the sound - horribly distorted, far cry from TW based ROMs can achieve. I find the pix on TW are a bit too bright (taking indoor shots with a lot of light tends to 'blind' the camera too much - easy fix is to bring exposure 2 notches down, and I have a mod that does it automatically). So, sadly, no more AOSP roms for me strictly because of the camera. Return of the Jedi for me :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] crixley:
Touchwiz camera is much better..

Tried both on my s3 that I had before this phone and tw roms took much better pics
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] skateoroma:
I hate AOSP camera too and for the same reasons I stick with TW ROMs. However, I really like carbon ROM 1.7 so I found this link to help in the camera area. It's not better than TW but it is a huge improvement over stock camera features. Let me know what you think...

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1746611
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] webbles17:
Tried the mod from the above post and ultra pixel doesn't seem to do much of anything. Just can't zoom as much.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] SpikeDrums:
I find the CM 4.2.2 Camera to be a little quicker with taking pics. I also find it produces more crisp pictures. Could just be me, or the ROM I'm on.

Never really cared for the TW camera gimmicky options; Best Face, Best Picture, Etc.
[Galaxy S II General] Alexk88:
Hi Guys

As you can see I'm new to this place. I've actually come here with some questions about rooting my phone (I've watched the video and used the search function :) ) but I think it's rude to be asking for help without introducing myself.

I'm Alex, 23, London. I'd never used XDA before but a friend told me about it and I was surprised at just how much info there is! So I think I'll be staying.

Cheers

Alex
[Galaxy S II General] Prashanthme:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1826497

Answers all NOOB questions!!!
[Galaxy S II General] crachel:
Welcome to the board, Alex.

A good place for you to start would be here

[Newbies][Recognized Contributors] New members friendly Q&A thread...

We don't really allow intro threads, since we have so many users it would be a real mess.

Closed
[Galaxy S III Themes and Apps] killbubble:
whenever i download a torrent file from which uses torcache, (im having problems with this ... and open the torrent in ttorrent or any other torrent app, the torrent file is seen as damaged. Why?
[Galaxy S III Themes and Apps] JJEgan:
That is a Warez site and strictly against \XDA rules to post about Warez .

Could be one of the reasons nothing works on your phone that you downloaded Malware from such sites .

jje
[Galaxy S III Themes and Apps] killbubble:
R: [APP PROBLEM] torrents

Why is it warez? You do know warez concerns pirated content? Ubuntu is a free linux distribution and can be dustributed by third party websites or modified by anyone.

Also you cannot say the website is a warez website, as it hosts third party content, both legal and (maybe) illegal.

Anything you say must be proved, you must prove i am posting about illegal contents.

Also it is not true nothing works on my phone, i've encountered a couple of bugs but they are more probably app problems than my own stuff...
[Galaxy S III Themes and Apps] laehtis:
Not every torrent is illegal. Check the file he is downloading. Yes. Open source linux. Torrent and peer-to-peer networks are fast ways to download also legal content, such as linux distros and android roms. So, downloading linux isn't warez.

Though, I understand your point, many of the files in those serves are illegal, but not all.
[Galaxy S III Themes and Apps] killbubble:
R: [APP PROBLEM] torrents

@jjegan

Anyone browsing the web for minimum a year would know this

.let alone internet veterans...

If the website has not been shutdown that means even the government hasn't been able to prove it warez site. if everyone reasoned like you they would say mediafire and all other file sharing sites (youtube, may i remind you, is a VERY good warez search engine, haven't you got something to say against it) are illegal. But that would mean people would be forbidden to post stuff that is hosted on mediafire...even if mediafire DOES delete all warez content as soon as notified (and youtube does not).

Also in this post the matter is more "torcache" than website, as it is torcache handing out the file.
[Galaxy S III Themes and Apps] coolnessQ:
Try bittorent app it works mostly times for me :) and torcache is ways a problemen when downloading torrents

Posted by the Q Master, woepidooo
[Galaxy S III Themes and Apps] killbubble:
R: [APP PROBLEM] torrents

I didnt mention earlier i tried utorrent also (which is the same as bittorrent, just like for pc they have that kinda weird advertisement policy and they produce the same product only with 2 different icons and names) but it's got the same problem.

Does everyone else have problems loading that torrent onto their torrent apps? I just need someone to try....possibli living in the usa but any other country is fine i guess
[Galaxy S III Themes and Apps] Nick Fury:
I use ttorrent pro but there is a lite version in the play store. Never had any problems with that and its pretty fast to be honest.

But of course even though the file your downloading may not contain viruses and malware, other files on the same servers may do so could be past around to even the more safer files.

I would advice using some sort of mobile internet security just to be safe mate
[Galaxy S III Themes and Apps] killbubble:
R: [APP PROBLEM] torrents

I use ttorrent pro as well....so u're saying the torrent file from that site works fine for you? Cuz for me downloading the file gives mea non working one, but using magnet link works just fine.

I will try scanning my phone for viruses even thou i seriously doubti have any, as i constantly look after my device...
[Galaxy S III Themes and Apps] Nick Fury:
Yeah its downloading just fine mate.
[Galaxy S III Themes and Apps] JJEgan:
That site you posted has multiple illegal copies of paid for apps and movies .

By any definition that is Warez and any user can open the site you posted and start downloading illegal content .You are posting a link to a warez site don't mind your link you are having trouble with .

Removing the site as above would have cleared the problem without it needing to be reported ..

I repeat with the number of problems you are posting having i suspect something wrong .

jje