yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Ace II General] ddikodroid:
I think if we want a working USB OTG, we need do a little modification on the kernel.
[Galaxy Ace II General] fauzanskywalker:
of course, you will need pit file from MB4/MB2

just waiting for real OC kernel, and not fake OC kernel

maybe you will need additional power, so make some modification with the OTG cable CMIIW
[Galaxy Ace II General] sdke:
Other people that have a bluetooth headset and can't find their device?
[Galaxy Ace II General] Mzyzol:
Hello!

I've been testing this rom for 2 days and I would be satisfied if I didn't have problems with black lockscreen. It usually happens when I try to switch app while watching videos on YouTube or MX Video Player. Does anyone else have this issue? The rest is fine. Rom is smooth enough, I haven't experienced problems with UI lags. Deepsleep works.
[Galaxy Ace II General] 99milan:
Has anyone updated the MC8 over kies? On Sammobile is KIES icon also. My I8160 is still in service.... can anyone upload the screenshot of STORAGE partitions MC8?
[Galaxy Ace II General] payer:
Pairing and (re-)connecting with my Blaupunkt MP57 Car Stereo and a Sony Ericsson HCB-108 Car Speakerphone works very well.
[Galaxy Ace II General] ddikodroid:
AFAIK, blank lockscreen is related to RAM usage.
[General Questions and Answers] nitesh.chavan:
Dear Friends,

How to root HCL ME U2.

Thanks and Regards,

Nitesh
[General Questions and Answers] Sanjay:
rooting is Nothing like unique for each mobile.

So follow the general method to root..

Search before posting...

---------- Post added at 06:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:15 PM ----------

Thread closed
[General Questions and Answers] nitesh.chavan:
Dear Sanjay,

I just tried all possible ways to root my TAB HCL ME U2.

First i tried to root it via Super one click using command line it says;

D:\System\ADB>adb root

adbd cannot run as root in production builds

D:\System\ADB>adb shell

shell@android:/ $

D:\System\ADB>adb shell getprop ro.secure

1

D:\System\ADB>adb shell mount -oremount,rw /dev/block/system /system

mount: Operation not permitted
[General Questions and Answers] Sanjay:
Sorry for being late...

Try rooting from mobile only like from ginger break.apk

Or use alternative app instead super one click.

Rootunlock....:thumbup:

http://d.qimada.com/opt/root/unlockrootpro3setup.exe
[General Questions and Answers] vrx29:
instal cwm

i have rooted my tab but i want to instal cwm plzz help me how to instal cwm on hcl u2 tab
[General Questions and Answers] arvndh:
please help

hi friend how did u root ur hcl me u2 plz reply...
[General Questions and Answers] Mak.singh:
I have also hcl me u2 , i rooted the same with unlock root, or can try one click older versions.

:)
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] gger123:
Hi,

My parents are currently using the Galaxy S, and I just want to flash a rom that will have strong battery life. Do gingerbread roms have the best battery life?

Thanks
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] palimpa:
With GB "Saurom JW8 v3 Odex " I had the best battery life ever in standby. After 5 days standby, I had 79% remaining battery life with a new 1800 mAh battery, and the kernel settings (in semaphore manager): governor: SaveBattery, semaphore autobrightness: normal.

GPS and Data were disabled (only GSM). I never had such a low standby power consumption with any CM or JB ROM.

But when you use your Galaxy S and the display is on, maybe you will be able to use your SGS 1-3 days until the battery is empty.

At the moment I use the latest GB ROM "Saurom JW9 v2 Odex" with the same settings but at the moment I`m using my SGS so that I cannot

say, if the battery life in standby is as good as with Saurom JW8 v3 Odex".
[General Questions and Answers] shmi:
Well, now it's a week later and my phone is back in my hands in worse shape than a week ago, now with a new gouge in the screen. The good news is, everything still works great on it but the screeching problem is still present. Everytime it powers up or I try to change the ring tone or anything that would require the speaker to function except actual phone calls causes and excruciating screeching noise. However, I am able to make phone calls and hear people fine. It's just that if someone calls the phone, it screeches - like fingernails on blackboard.

Any ideas on how I can repair this thing? How do I get the back off even after I have removed the four screws? Does it pry straight off or slide off or what? And if I do get it off, one of the tech support guys who heard the screeching over the phone said that he thought it was probably a loose cable going to the speaker making partial contact or shorting with something.

I'd like to give it a shot. I've got nothing to lose....... got any advice?

Shmi
[General Questions and Answers] jpiek:
Howmany threads are ypu going to open about this subject ?

This is the 3rd one i see since yesterday.

And i read abut his problem allready yesterday evening...
[General Questions and Answers] shmi:
no answer

aren't we a little testy? If you don't want to read it, don't open it. But I still didn't get an answer to the questions that I have posed.
[General Questions and Answers] jpiek:
Yes you did, but you have to read all the reply's of all the threads :roll: :roll:
[General Questions and Answers] bidule1970:
yes i' have

---------- Post added at 10:06 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:05 AM ----------

me too
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] supramon:
Hey guys,

I tried to install the redpill kernel on my note 2 7100, and when I try to flash it, it just failed... So I want to know how to install it.

Thanks.
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] adinfsfocus:
Hi,just flash this to recovery if you are on Omega Rom
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] UtkarshGupta:
Or you could have just linked to the thread.
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] adinfsfocus:
Maybe it don't now what to download so don't coment with no sense.
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] UtkarshGupta:
It?
[About XDA developers] Richcar:
galaxy tab 2 development
[About XDA developers] Deadly:
What is this thread meaning?

Were you trying to find these sections..,?

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1900055

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2203309

____________________________________

“If you wait to do everything until you’re sure it’s right, you’ll probably never do much of anything.” –Win Borden
[About XDA developers] the_scotsman:
As already posted above, Galaxy Tab 2 forums can be found here: http://xdaforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1596
[Transformer TF300T Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dmont2006:
Ok guys I have been trying to root my TF300T all night but to no avail. I'm on Stock JellyBean and I have the the necessary files but when I enter fastboot it reboots before I have a chance to enter the command prompts. I've even tried to the terminal method but when I enter SU it says it can't be found and I already have super user installed. What am I doing wrong? BTW Im not a noob but this is different from rooting my phone so break it down easy for me please :)
[Transformer TF300T Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Kazman101:
What recovery have you installed? ClockworkMod?
[Transformer TF300T Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dmont2006:
I realize now that I have to act quickly for the process but anyway I tried CWM and TWRP but I prefer the easiest to install and one thing I forgot to mention is once I enter recovery it says key driver not installed and I've already installed the driver. It also doesn't highlight my selections.
[Galaxy S 4 General] katamari201:
One of the biggest and most enduring complaints against the Galaxy S phones is their cheap feeling, plastic build quality and lack of premium materials. The plastic build is quite functional, and has many merits like high yields, good reception, removable battery, etc., but many people still have reservations about jumping onto the Galaxy bandwagon, especially those coming from HTC or Apple phones, or just plain have a strong dislike for plastic on their smartphones and want a premium metal one instead. They know they will be losing conveniences like a removable battery or removable storage, experience minor problems like signal attenuation and easy scuffing and scratches, have a slightly thicker and heavier phone, but are willing to make the compromise for the rigidity and the luxuriousness of a cold metal slab in their hand.

Samsung is no stranger to making aluminum phones, like the Samsung Wave, Omnia, etc. They will also invariably make a million different phones based on the Galaxy S4 design, phone names ending in Note, Ace, Mini, Star, Plus, Grand, Duos, etc. Would it be so difficult for one of these releases to be an aluminum version of the S4? Not only will you quickly silence critics and enamor fans who have been beseeching you for this very thing, you will be increasing your dominance over the smartphone world by converting many an Apple and HTC fan and winning over a whole demographic of people who have previously shunned your phones. It may be a minority, but it is a sizable and vocal minority that will translate to great sales and great publicity for the Galaxy brand. You won't need high yields, carrier deals, or special engineering and design that you didn't already possess from past phones. You can sell it online unlocked with few barriers. No need for LTE either. It doesn't have to be grand or breathtaking. It just needs to be metal. As mentioned above, we are willing to make the compromises, which we find quite minor, as long as the best parts of the S4 stay intact like the screen, camera, and processor. Please consider granting the request of a longtime Samsung user (as far back as the 5MP G600 slider) and countless others who want an aluminum Galaxy S4.
[Galaxy S 4 General] barondebxl:
I like this thread ;)

If sammy makes an aluminium S5 (not gonna happen with S4), then i'll be cool with it. But the plastic doesn't bother me one bit, i would love however, a design change and the polycarbonate to be as good and rigid as the One X. Thats very good plastic right there.

Its true that samsung could use a different type of material and gain even more customers, but the plastic hasnt stop galaxy s sales one bit, actually it looks like the demand for the S4 is 4 times the S3 demand in the UK (dont quote me on that). A more premium device is always better, no question about it, but samsung does such a great job with the software, features and cutting edge spes that it does more than make up for it.
[Galaxy S 4 General] persheshhater:
So....$900 for a phone? (Already costs $800). No thank you. No need to spoonfeed sammy. They already make tons of profits out of this phone.
[Galaxy S 4 General] daleski75:
We are already paying a premium for the S4 in the UK.
[Galaxy S 4 General] 1337RYoN:
I would be willing to sacrifice weight and thickness for an extra 2000 MAh of battery, but I don't see the point of sacrificing it for just an aluminium case.
[Galaxy S 4 General] FinancialWar:
if you want people to take your poll seriously, then don't make a joke of it. I was going to vote until I saw the the options.

The title of the thread is a simple yes/no question, so why be a clown when making a poll and put all those useless options, and they're not even funny and stop playing pokemons. How old are you?
[Galaxy S 4 General] daleski75:
If Samsung overhauled touchwiz and used materials which when you picked up the phone you thought wow this feels great then count me in I would buy one without hesitation.

Paying a premium price for a phone should mean the phone feels premium and not some cheap plastic toy.
[Galaxy S 4 General] mang0:
I find it rather amusing when others insult people who like what they don't like. "I hate x game, but you like it, so you must be a loser!"

To the OP: Depends on the cost. I live in the U.S., so if it's still a subsidized cost of $199.99/299.99 -ish (for respective internal storage), then I would definitely consider it. That seems doubtful though, so probably not.
[Galaxy S 4 General] sohebq:
I would prefer buying a back cover worth $20, rather than paying samsung an extra $100 for a new design. I am not at all bothered by the material or design, I know I will get used to it within a day and after that all I will need is solid performance and new features

sent from: The New S-Pen :)
[Galaxy S 4 General] barondebxl:
^This times 100 million, the S4 is gonna be the most fun phone to use, the material and design arent issues for me either, actually i like it a lot.
[Galaxy S 4 General] -A-P-M-:
Yes. Cheap plastic bothers me a lot, while HTC One, Xperia Z, iPhone and even N4 feels and looks premium. Even only aluminium (real) trim on sides would be already great and not painted plastic, which cracked on sgs3 without reason.

Other thing I dont like is lack of sources, but I guess i9505 will be better than my current phone in that view.

With premium design and materials I would already ordered i9505, but now Im still not sure. I will order it if Motorola X wont be launched on Google I/O or if it wont be as good as I hope for.
[Galaxy S 4 General] ama3654:
The plastic don't bother me at all, for goodness sake Coca-cola cans are made out of aluminium. in fact its much more sturdier than S3, what's inside matters a lot to me(CPU/GPU, RAM, I/O speed) and i believe it has the best hardware compared to the HTC One and Xperia Z, and besides repairs is a doodle too. I wish anyone repairing a HTC One without warranty a very goodluck.
[Galaxy S 4 General] daleski75:
Can't deny that plastic is more durable but I think with the price premium good old sammy are charging people expect a phone to be made out of aluminium or glass but there are of course limitations with removable battery covers when it comes to using materials like that.
[Galaxy S 4 General] ama3654:
I will personally prefer carbon fibre or some ceramic material to call premium, aluminium/plastic is too common and cheap to make, glass is cheap too and fragile, but that's just me. I think carbon fibre with removable battery will just be awesome. Another thing is the AMOLED display and DDR3 RAM are premium components compared to LCD/DDR2.
[Galaxy S 4 General] Mittaa:
Don't like glass covered smartphones they are just so damned fragile!

If possible the body of my next smartphone should be made out of rubber, so when I drop it on a stone floor, it just bounce back into my hand :D

BTW I don't think Sammy take the biggest bite of this cake... retailers do!
[Galaxy S 4 General] mang0:
Would love a carbon fiber smartphone. :D
[Galaxy S 4 General] xyz007:
I wouldn't pay extra, because I find polycarbonate (which is only the back cover) used more then adequate for normal period of phones life 2-3 years for most people. If need be, one can always buy aftermarket metal or glass back cover and as a bonus get thermal or reception issues.

Sure it is nice to hold aluminum, but definitely not a must have for me. I would pay premium to have removable plastic back cover where I can access battery and sd card. Since battery is not likely to survive even 2 years of every day charging. And paying half-a-new-phone and sending it somewhere to get battery changed is just incredibly impractical.

Not to even get started on having all glass phone... We all know whose idea that was, but even Apple doesn't do it any more. I find absolutely no positive in all glass phone. Only looks, maybe...

---------- Post added at 12:23 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:10 PM ----------

Exactly, I never had a feeling of my phone not being no.1 most premium device, if not prior, then at the 1st look at its full RGB amoled screen. For me there's no going back to any other display tech. And this is my first amoled as well as Samsung phone. Before I only had Samsung tablet and Htc and Nokia phones.
[Galaxy S 4 General] riz157:
I second that.

Samsung are overpricing S4 way to expensive, I wouldn't pay that much for a Premuim build phone never mind cheap plastic. Samsung are taking the mick that's why I jumped ship.
[Galaxy S 4 General] Jokesy:
Aluminium, glass means no buy for me, Lesson already learned. Aluminum only looks good at the beginning, but tends to look way worse after few months.
[Galaxy S 4 General] xyz007:
But this is actually really interesting topic:

There should be 2 galaxies s4 - one as it is, with removable polycarbonate back cover and other say with aluminum.

Would you pay, say +50eur to have s4 made of (unibody) aluminum or glass and have inaccessible battery?

I wouldn't. And I wonder which would sell better. :)
[Galaxy S 4 General] Seth Johan:
Maybe? But I'm happy with the polycarbonate. I like the feel of it in my hand.
[Galaxy S 4 General] Steve_max:
Pay extra for a harder phone (so impacts will either dent the metal or transmit to the screen, making it less durable) with a natural block for GSM/HSPA/LTE waves, making it heavier in the process? What's not to like? :p
[Galaxy S 4 General] tclocki:
I think there are metal/aluminum backcases being sold in some countries now. I don't think I'd like to buy that. I like the polycarbonate too.
[Galaxy S 4 General] MysteriousDiary:
1) not for the lack of a swappable battery

2) Aluminium is one of the most dirty materials we have

So no. I would have preffered a back like the Nexus 7 has, but Aluminium is rhe last thing i would want.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9505 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S 4 General] Dargan:
You could always keep an eye on sources such as www.cnn.cn and see if one gets released. That is, a compete metal housing for the phone.

Or, if you are happy to pay a premium, pay someone to make you a custom housing. I'm sure there's companies out there that do this for you...
[Galaxy S 4 General] xyz007:
This is premium, not beer can material, so there you have it, way better than ****y htc one or xz... if you want to pay...

http://www.gsmarena.com/gold_samsung_galaxy_s4_is_now_available_for___pound1700-news-6072.php
[Galaxy S 4 General] ffsbro:
Same here.
[Galaxy S 4 General] btemtd:
No alluminium is **** id rather how it is now. Toodles cubye
[Galaxy S 4 General] Euthye:
Wow actual premium material instead of that crap "percieved" premium material they make some phones from.
[Galaxy S 4 General] RoChinu:
If they can keep the price reasonable, yes I'd gladly go back to Samsung. At the moment using Xperia Z which I love but if Samsung can manage to combine software, hardware and premium build than I'll be in the shops to get one.
[Galaxy S 4 General] vantt1:
I miss the textured ABS plastic back of the Galaxy S2...if only Samsung had improved it from there, maybe making it have a carbon fibre or brushed (not necessarily metal) texture. The worst part of any electronics device is the glossy plastic. But the metallic-paint-finish-looking black plastic in the S2 was pretty good.

(Real) Metal bezel + textured ABS battery cover = perfect!
[Galaxy S 4 General] phillipm:
One of many reasons I just swapped a HTC One for a Galaxy S4. Always worried about the aluminum getting scratched.

I hope Samsung stick to plastic.
[Galaxy S 4 General] snxxxxx:
Actually i dont need alumunium or other metal build. But i hate the glossy look. If someone make doff version of black or white back cover. I thinl i will buy it..
[Galaxy S 4 General] mstockham:
Great poll, but!

Nice poll, however there is a great upside to having a removeable back on the S3 / S4, you can buy an aluminum back for your phone. I bought one for $5 as soon as I got my S4 and its great, adds some "heft" to the phone and makes it a tiny bit thicker, but adds to the feel of quality.

I love the looks on peoples faces when they tell me my phone is a bit plasticky.

Simple but very effective, not sure how well it plays with the NFC though, theres always a tradeoff....

MS
[Galaxy S 4 General] marc_ecko28:
I will.. as far as the battery is removable, signal reception will not suffer on death grip, minimize heating issue.

Galaxy S and Note line are always almost perfect except those plastic materials.

Sent from my GT-I9500
[Galaxy S 4 General] difyel:
Imho the s4 is an overpriced device . So paying an extra is a big no no . Any enhancement are already covered by the current ptice tag .

Sent From my Gt-i9505
[Galaxy S 4 General] marc_ecko28:
If s4 is overprice... iphone is super overprice...

=)

Btw I agree that s5 dont need to increase its regardless of physical enhancement...

Sent from my GT-I9500
[Galaxy S 4 General] maysider:
No

plastic is better

Lighter

Cheaper

Absorbs hits
[Galaxy S 4 General] leeoleelo:
aren't they gonna make an alu body for the next galaxy (S5 rumored) ?
[Galaxy S 4 General] solara1973:
I don't care what material the back cover is since I use cases for all my phones.

I'm sure using Aluminum will cut down on the signal reception for the antenna though - as confirmed in a thread where someone bought an aftermarket aluminum back cover and checked the signal strength before and after.
[Galaxy S 4 General] pinsb:
No

Sent from Stock I9505 running 4.2.2
[Galaxy S 4 General] rushless:
Nope. Will feel hotter to the touch and might have weaker radio signal like the HTC One. The Verizon version as example has 3 to 5 dbm weaker signal than the S4.
[Galaxy S 4 General] rl421403:
Nope. I can't say I have any problem with polycarbonate but I have issues with Aluminum. Aluminum gets scratches very easily and visible. And it doesn't looks good.
[Galaxy S 4 General] vantt1:
Check out the pics in my signature. My ideal design would be a metal bezel/frame surrounding the phone, with a carbon fibre textured back. I've heard that real carbon fibre also disrupts radio signals.
[Galaxy S 4 General] vantt1:
Why don't we have both? I used to use an aluminium back for my Galaxy S2 which I got from eBay for about $10. I'm sure there will be one for the S4 soon.
[Galaxy S 4 General] xyz007:
Since removable aluminium cover would take whole back side wouldn't that kill the gsm and wifi reception? I believe that was the reason Apple few years ago opted for glass, which due to better isolation might have thermal issues. I think there must be some plastic somewhere as on One and just don't see how that could be done with removable back cover.

As for price. Yeah it might be 10 Bucks when you buy it like that, but unibody design, due to higher cost of servicing (due to inaccessibility and manufacturing) even higher weight would definitely add more than 10 bucks to the price.

Anyway out of two, I would choose the cheaper with removable back cover. Actually I would choose it even if the price would be the same. Heck I would pay few euros extra for having battery and sd card removable regardless of cover... :)
[Galaxy S 4 General] vantt1:
Sorry for double posting, but I do agree with a few points mentioned previously. Samsung has made the right choice making their flagships primarily of plastic. It is very durable, and damage isn't as visible when it is inflicted. And because plastic phones are much easier to open up than aluminium ones, it is easier for a user to customise it themselves rather than being told what is good by the manufacturer. I've never really heard Samsung bragging about their phones' plastic construction, but Apple and HTC tend to rub it into customer's face more these days.

Anyway, it is true that aluminium is a number one cause of bad reception, and only looks good in the beginning. After a bit of use, it starts denting, scratching and irreversibly deforming making it look like scrap metal. That's why I threw the aluminium back cover in the trash to make way for a nice carbon fiber back cover.
[Galaxy S 4 General] jkforce:
+1000 cant agree more. I usually find beautiful/unique/practical case and screen protector even before i have phone on my hand. So phone's dimensions, benchmark performance, and update habit of company behind the phone are the most important thing for me. Sammy isnt perfect but i see no better manufacturers than sammy on all three account currently in market.