yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] Yorch:
thanks for the heads up, I'll email Andy to see if he can fix it. I noticed also that there is a lot of files missing in the website. Sorry that I haven't maintained more often like I should, but I'm very close to get married, and work is hectic, and Xmas too, leaves me little time for the website.

I'll try to delete everything and restore a fresh and clean backup that I had.

in the meanwhile:

DO NOT DOWNLOAD ANYTHING FROM THE WEBSITE, AND IF YOU DO, USE IT AT YOUR OWN RISK!

that's why is always good to use a good Antivirus
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] andygee:
Are you talking about a file from the kitchen or just from his website? I have scanned the server with both Norton and Trend and I don't get any virus alert on any of the files. Can you give me more details so I might can find the problem? Thanks
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] gazzaman2k:
i had that today but with jeffs somthing about uploading flash files via bootloader but in the cradel tool thing i was looking though my s/w and all of a sudden pop norton found a backdoor virus in jeff...exe and has deleted the file ah well lol
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] pdhenry:
Thanks for the headsup. I'm scanning my PCs as we speak, and will scan the PPCPE when they're done.

Yorch: Thanks again for your community service. Hopefully things will be back to normal soon.

PDH
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] JimDavis:
Slightly off topic here but gazzaman2k mention Jeff's - Is Jeff's kitchen still up? I can't get to it anymore from the links I've found on here. Yorch and all - Thanks for all your hard work and Happy Holidays :D - Jim
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] gazzaman2k:
na jeffs kitchen closed down :( i read somewhere the database got messed up or summin and he didnt have time to keep maintaining it anymore so it closed down :( shame really as that was the only kitchen online that had v4.00.11 for all the uk members of this site :(
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] andygee:
Yeah I really liked the 4.00.11 as well. If I just had all the files necessary to add that one to the kitchen I would for ya.
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] gazzaman2k:
i got a cooked v4.00.11 but its got the security rom on it linking to my dads mobile so i cant really upload it to my webspace for peeps to download as it would kain their credit and my dad would be going nuts with all the texts comming in lol.

its in the .exe form so if you can use any of the files from that lmk and ill see what i can do :)

gaz
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] siliconaddict:
got a barebone 4.00.11

I have one, if you have a site I can upload it to I will.
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] yann:
i've already uploaded on my ftp the 4.00.11 rom (uncoocked)

The FTP is also open to upload other versions.

Hope to see one day the 4.00.11 rom in the kitchen ;-)

Cheers,
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] yann:
with the FTP server adress :roll:

ftp:\\server268.com

username:xda

password:myxda
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] pdhenry:
Back on topic - I scanned the laptop andthe sektop - the laptop came back with Backdoor.Trojan in XDATools.exe - BUT I think I got that program from xda-developers and not from Yorch.

I've been poking around both sites in the last couple of weeks so I may be mistaken, but the key is that EVERYONE OUGHT TO UPDATE THEIR VIRUS DEF FILES AND DO A SCAN!

PDH
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] Startup:
I'm not sure that virus alert is a legitimate one. I've had a version of XDATools for at leat 2 months that never offended Norton AV. When I upgraded to the 2004 NAV it complained about XDATools (and deleted it without letting me confirm or fix :evil: ). So I downloaded it again, which is promptly complained about again (and deleted :evil: ). I think the tool just may have an unfortunate byte pattern or the low level calls it makes to the PDA might be interperted incorrectly by the new NAV. Anybody have any definitive information about this?
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] valheru:
I mentioned a few times I would be happy to host a fast kitchen online with all of the roms available if someone would help/donate a functioning kitchen. Let me know.
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] siliconaddict:
downloaded from Yorch before WITHOUT virus warning!

I have created ROMS on Yorch's kitchen before, without ever getting a virus warning. Last Thursday I have created a WM2003 .EXE file, with the trojan. Luckily Norton AntiVirus 2003 -the same version I've been using for like a year now- was working well.
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] andygee:
Re: downloaded from Yorch before WITHOUT virus warning!

If you still have the rom send it to me and I'll check it. The virus you are saying it's detecting is not found on Linux boxes. The kitchen is running on Linux. I have downloaded and scanned the source and haven't found anything. I believe like someone else mentioned that it is a false positive.
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] siliconaddict:
no infected ROM

NAV2003 blocked access to it and quarantained it and then I deleted it. Sorry.
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] MrDollyMaker:
I'm thinking along the lines of a false positive as I don't have any alerts going off.... :?:
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] siliconaddict:
???

Good for you, but what does that tell me :?: That you antivirus software is no good or mine?
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] gazzaman2k:
im thinking that norton 2003/4 seems to see the xdatools thing as a virus as thats what mine deleted
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] valheru:
I have 2003 and have not had any errors on two computers with xda tools. I have scanned the .exe as well and nothing. Mind you, you should not have it running when using xdatools anyway. Just my .02.
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] frbill:
XDA-Tools.exe

I got a NAV 2004 warning not on any roms but on the XDA-Tools.exe. It left the installed tool alone. And it was only after an update on 12/16/2003. Hope this helps track down the culprit code.

Peace,

Fr. Bill Kessler
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] siliconaddict:
Jeff's Cooked ROM 4.00.11 ENG plain vanilla

Here it is, Jeff's 4.00.11 ENG ROM for the XDA I. This is the version that I'm still running, IMHO the best cooked ROM.
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] yann:
siliconaddict,

How did you build the 4.00.11 rom with jeff kitchen since it's not available in his kitchen? :?

If you did so, did you build it with the theft protection?? i don't think you want to receive undereds of SMS from every one :wink:

cheers,

Yann
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] siliconaddict:
4.00.11 cooked ROM without theft protection

This version was available on Jeff's kitchen, just before it went offline permanently. I downloaded it just in time, of course without knowing that Jeff's kitchen would vanish. Lucky me :D It is a version WITHOUT theft protection and WITHOUT all the extra goodies, so just a barebone 4.00.11 ROM. I am running this version on my XDA with Radio 4.21 and it is very stable.
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] GregP74:
Ok that was pretty weird. I just went into the folder on my pc where i have all my pocketpc stuff. All of the sudden NAV 2003 popped up and said my rom.exe from a few weeks ago had the trojan. Never said that before.

I am thinking maybe one of symantec's latest updates is finding flagging the file by mistake?
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] MrDollyMaker:
Re: ???

Well, for starters I have NAV2004 running with the latest updates. You might be running into a glitch in 2003 that is thinking some code in the program to be a virus.

MrDollyMaker
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] MrDollyMaker:
That or you have a virus already in your system that has confused Norton. I suggest going to their website and doing the online system scan they offer for free. It might help shine some light on this.

MrDollyMaker
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] pdhenry:
I'm running Norton System Works 2003.

I upgrade via the Wallaby bootloader, so my ROM images are .nb1 files (e.g., I don't have any upgrader .exe files). NSW 2003 told me that XDATools.exe was infected; I had just downloaded it to my laptop and then copied it over to my desktop. I never ran a ROM upgrade through XDATools on the laptop.

NSW 2003 automatically deleted XDATools.exe; I ran the scan again and it came back clean.

The desktop has McAfee AntiVirus (an older version but the definitions are up to date). I ran a McAfee scan on the desktop but didn't find anything..

I'm suspecting that Norton is seeing something in the various ROM exe files that it considers to be viral. Maybe it's not surprising.
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] MrDollyMaker:
Try upgrading to NSW2004. The virus scanner is much more effecient and has less false positives.

MrDollyMaker
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] atm153:
After reading up a bit on how newer Android phones went about fixing the silliness that comes from having external storage, I realized the Nexus S would be a perfect candidate to convert to the newer MTP method of accessing the device's storage while it's on. I'm already doing this with CM10, but I'm not actually getting much benefit out of it because the device still has an "SD Card". How would I go about merging the data and sd-ext partitions? Since it's all technically one internal flash chip, I don't see there being any major issues with this. Could be very wrong though.

I'm using a Nexus S 4G with CM10 Stable, but I don't think that should terribly matter as long as I'm on a 4.X.X ROM with MTP support.

EDIT: Is this the wrong place for this question? Like, is there somewhere more technical I should post this?
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ben303:
did you figure out how to make more space for apps?
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] fastguy:
Hi,

I'm looking for a new battery for my Galaxy note as the original one I had seems to have died. I saw a lot of discussion on other branded batteries, Chinese ones etc. but I'm looking for original genuine ones. Any idea how much these cost? It seems impossible to find in the net.

Thanks.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] baz77:
you should try on instead of in. just kidding, Go to accessory page in this forum and check some of the battery threads
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Pralou06fr:
You may try to use google with "Samsung EB615268VU", this is the reference written on the GT N7000 battery.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] geoux:
Indian Rupees 750/- (approx 14 USD) from authorized service center.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] droindian:
Its around 10-12$ with a 6 months warranty and yes from Official Samsung Service Centre.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] fastguy:
Thanks for the replies. I'm in Dubai and went to the Samsung Service center, they ask for 150dhs which is around 40usd. It's a ripoff then :(

I have no other choice than to buy it as my battery can't sustain more than 20min npw, I can't find the battery nowhere here and ordering from Internet will take either too much time or similar price with quick shipment. :(
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] arco68:
Enjoy!
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] geniusboy93:
Re: [ROM][JB][4.2.2][JDQ39] CyanogenMod 10.1 ALPHA (Build 1)

First:D

Atlast, cm10.1 for our wonder is released. Gud job sir arco. You are really amazing sir. Feel very happy :') Thanks alot sir:D
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] daniel3x:
GREAT! I will donate to you one more time, you really deserve it sir.

Thank you Arco
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] Madridii:
OMG

You are the best yeaaaaaah

and everything working I cant believe
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] fratoff91:
R: [ROM][JB][4.2.2][JDQ39] CyanogenMod 10.1 ALPHA (Build 1)

You are the best!!!!
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] SGWUser:
Re: [ROM][JB][4.2.2][JDQ39] CyanogenMod 10.1 ALPHA (Build 1)

THANKS!! Will definitely try this when I have time tomorrow!
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] temenalie:
Re: [ROM][JB][4.2.2][JDQ39] CyanogenMod 10.1 ALPHA (Build 1)

Speechless....

Thanks arco, you are the best !!
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] frozonecom:
I'm sorry if this is such a noobie question but, will CM10 kernel like Batur's Kernel work on this one?!? :D I'm so excited! ^_^ THanks arco! :)
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] mikrotik:
excellent
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] SGWUser:
Re: [ROM][JB][4.2.2][JDQ39] CyanogenMod 10.1 ALPHA (Build 1)

Sorry, probably not.
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] gabrieledangeli:
Sorry how can I do the swap of memories?
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] Clyke:
Re: [ROM][JB][4.2.2][JDQ39] CyanogenMod 10.1 ALPHA (Build 1)

Thanks for this sir arco ur the best
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] blackcat67:
ARcoooooooooo Thanksssss :D :D
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] ibanez7:
Re: [ROM][JB][4.2.2][JDQ39] CyanogenMod 10.1 ALPHA (Build 1)

Amazing arco68.... U best ever ROM Dev on Galaxy W :)
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] kyoshiro67:
Re: [ROM][JB][4.2.2][JDQ39] CyanogenMod 10.1 ALPHA (Build 1)

Hohoho...thanks sir :thumbup:
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] SGWUser:
Re: [ROM][JB][4.2.2][JDQ39] CyanogenMod 10.1 ALPHA (Build 1)

Through volf.fstab, just like in CM10.
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] Motorhead1991:
Hopefully KemoNine and I aren't too far behind you with this on the apache ;).
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] dadat0:
Will cm10 kernels work with this?

Like yoon?
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] gdonanthony:
try to fix permission
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] klacenas:
https://github.com/arco/samsung-kernel-msm7x30/commit/ec2f2b4e2876197ab2d30d23a925eceae9b2e2b3
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] coolbuy:
@arco68:

Few interesting things i found.

I've tried CM9 A7 & CM10 A7 before.. When using inbuilt kernel my phone was not going to deep sleep. But later i switched to baturKernel and hurtsky kernel and the phone was going to deepsleep without the help for deepsleep batterysaver.

abt CM10.1:

As i reported earlier, i was having horrible battery life with CM10.1 A1 though many here responded that they were getting good battery life. I switched to hurtsky's kernel and the battery issues got resolved.. i am getting good battery life now.. the only thing is the phone is heating up a bit when using GPRS. When using GPRS it easily heats up to 40C in battery indicator. temperature when the phone is idle is 30C, which used to be 27C with CM9.

Why do i experience such issues with your kernel. is it because of the toolchain used or is there really hardware differences between different galaxy w's?
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] Quinncy:
CM9 on "RC" stage and CM10.1 on "Alpha" stage
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] temenalie:
Re: [ROM][JB][4.2.2][JDQ39] CyanogenMod 10.1 ALPHA (Build 1)

+1

It is "Initial Release" stage, but already perfect for my daily use.
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] Bomoh:
Re: [ROM][JB][4.2.2][JDQ39] CyanogenMod 10.1 ALPHA (Build 1)

Yeahh, finally ivendor fixed wep encryption :)
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] coolbuy:
Please re-read my post again. I didn't say CM10.1 is buggy or CM9 is buggy. I said my stupid phone experience battery drain issues with inbuilt kernel while it's getting a better battery with custom kernels, but for few other they do not experience heavy battery drain. I went pristine many times.

I just gave arco the input, so that he can fix the issue..
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] Quinncy:
it was normal after installing new ROM or update ROM

after several cycles it will be stable, it's my experience on CM9. I don't know if on CM10.

Sometimes CM9 also drained my battery very fast. Try BetterBatteryStats to monitoring your battery.
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] eryzerz:
Re: [ROM][JB][4.2.2][JDQ39] CyanogenMod 10.1 ALPHA (Build 1)

I think complaining about battery, is not use. Because, i know i'm using smartphone right now. Not Nokia 3300 or some older phone who have a long life battery hehe -_-v
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] SGWUser:
It seems you're the only one that's getting it :)
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] Hyst:
True :D And probably many people don't realize that. Buying a smartphone and wondering why the phone do not last a week or two is just..... let's say: thoughtless.

BUT if battery life is drastically worse than on other roms, it should be at least mentioned. Like, when I am just browsing (nothing else.. only wifi is on) and my battery drops in 30 minutes from 90% to 60% or even to 50%, than this is in my eyes an unusual battery drain. And need to charge the phone more than once a day on moderate use is also too much (for me at least). EVEN for a Smartphone (as I said.. I am talking about moderate use here).

But still one should not *complain*, as this is just an alpha stage -- meaning there is still much room for improvement.

However I would suggest, for anyone who wants to *mention* a potential battery problem should (I differentiate between complaining and mentioning):

be sure that they installed everything correctly, and check with BBS or similar if the drain is not from some background 3rd party app

be careful how they write their post, so that it does not read as a complain.

tell how they noticed the battery drain. Like: "it dropped form x% to y% while I was doing XYZ" so that other people can relate if this is indeed unusual or normal.

not post it in the dev-thread. rather in the discussions thread

I remember that there was a battery-thread somewhere, but I don't find it right now. MAYBE it would be a good idea to re-open such a thread. So everybody with battery issues mentions it in that thread. So that we can collect data. Like which tasks eat how much battery. So people can see if it is unusual or not. And we don't have this discussion here over and over again.

But then again: probably many people won't read it and post it here anyways.

Anyhow: enjoy this beautiful rom. I like it and I am not switching back :)
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] abdismoz:
Ynt: [ROM][JB][4.2.2][JDQ39] CyanogenMod 10.1 ALPHA (Build 1)

Deleted
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] heross:
The discussion is one in my opinion but her right here. Because it is clearly a Rom or kernel problem. And it has only been published by JB with kernel 3.0, before everything was halfway OK. and under ICS/CM9 was perfekt.

You will recognize it well on the batteryhistory. to CM9 and under stockrom the display of awaketime worked very well and accurately. Since CM10 batteryhistory shows the Awaketime incorrectly. Under CM10 too many Awake and under CM10.1 far too few. (see any screenshots posted from various users)

I think only when the Battery History re-established, then the battery problems will disappear. The same is true with BBS, because this gives erroneous Awaketimes with all JB Roms. The problem affects not only the GalaxyW but different devices, if not all devices with JB without Stockrom.
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] arsradu:
Re: [ROM][JB][4.2.2][JDQ39] CyanogenMod 10.1 ALPHA (Build 1)

From my experience so far...I would say CM10a7. Anyway, as suggested just above your post, please, try to post this kind of questions/discussion starters into the discussion thread from the General section. This way, you also get a better chance of someone actually responding to you and you might be surprised how many useful things you might pick up if you choose to do so. :)
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] RickySiMo:
Call waiting

Thanks arco for this awesome ROM! Finally we have call waiting information back again! Super!
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] abdismoz:
Ynt: [ROM][JB][4.2.2][JDQ39] CyanogenMod 10.1 ALPHA (Build 1)

Sorry I wasn't aware there is a discussion thread and thank you for your reply
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] coolbuy:
if a smartphone can provide 2 days standby time with stockROM and the same smartphone can only provide 12hrs of standby time with a customROM, then its a problem.

I love AOSP android whether its GB/ICS/JB flavour. Its way better than original samsung ****.. especially for our phone. What is the use of a smartphone that has 2GHz speed, ultra smooth game play but will only stay on for 2 hours in active usage? Would anyone buy a phone from the market if they tell them 'our phone will give you unmatched performance but it has only 1hour batterylife?'

Smartphones are portable devices and they should do justice to their portability.. Not everyone in this forum are experiencing battery drains, and because of it majority believes that people are lying to bring something down or disrespecting the developer. Think about it, what gains do an end user get by bringing down / disrespecting a developer :confused:

People needs to be honest with the developer if they are supporting him to finish his work. I post issues concerning directly to this rom in this thread bcz there is a high chance of the developer noticing the input rather than from any other threads.

As i posted earlier, i noticed few issues with the stock kernel while those issues were elevated with custom kernels. so there is something in these original kernels which is affecting my phone.. but not the majory of GalaxyW users, Weird!

Thanks to arco for developing and sharing his ROM with us. :good:
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] MeowNYC:
Re: [ROM][JB][4.2.2][JDQ39] CyanogenMod 10.1 ALPHA (Build 1)

So we need to wait for the update frm arco to fix the wep security?:o
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] Madzix:
The battery gets drained from no signal or unknow signal.

BBS shows me like that, both of them are 100% drainers.

Is that a bug?
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] ketheriel:
Right; And it's nice you do... you contribute to the community, you help the developers and everyone is happy. Thanks for doing that.

If tested and proven, then it's a fact, not a theory.

Which proves what I said earlier, higher heapsize allows more objects to be stored in memory thus increasing performance. This makes sense for application which load lots of resources since memory bus is always faster than standard storage.

I would probably be more concerned with Dalvik's garbage collectors (hint?) :fingers-crossed:
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] bigboss2200:
Posting my opinion, after 4 days of trying this ROM :)

Its a great release, for a first build, but not for daily use.. I've faced a couple of problems using this ROM, some of them were for the first time, although, i went totally prestine :) , and my notes are as follows:

1- As you all know, the keyboard "google voice typing" is force closing whenever you click on it, so if you want to go back to your normal keyboard, you have first to disable "google voice typing" from settings, then go back, which leads us to note number 2:

2- Even after you disable "google voice typing", it auto activate itself after a while, I dunno why, where, or how, but it activate itself again, which is kinda frustrating since it force close whenever you "by mistake", click on it

3- the ear speakers have a real low volume even if you put the speaker volumes to maximum "the one which you use for a normal phone call", now I have my personal doubts that my hardware is faulty since I reinstalled CM 4.1.2 and had the same issue, but it first started with this ROM

4- Now this is a real strange problem and happened once: I received a phone call, the phone kept vibrating, and ringing, with "phone forced close", i can't exactly remember which process it was, but I didn't even see the answer screen, nothing, it just kept vibrating and ringing with that force close screen, even I couldn't switch off the phone.. So I removed the battery, installed it again, and re-opened the phone..

5- I saw a very , very, in the icon at the upper right when I used to open the camera.. its not that of a serious problem, because pictures taken were great, and I have no complain about if of what-so-ever.

These were my observations.. The battery life was THE BEST of all ROMS, I never had this long of battery life with any of the previous ROMS, and dude, arco, you are an amazing guy, thank you for all your efforts, I, and all the members here, do appreciate your work.. Our phone is alive because of your hard work, we can't thank you enough :)

Best Regards
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] LeroViten:
bigboss2200,

Sorry dude, none of your described problems (except those described in OP of the Discussion Thread) happened to me since the first day of this release so far. ;) And it's surely my daily ROM!

Sent from my CM10.1 powered Wonder!
[Samsung Galaxy W I8150] Ukolino:
Same here. Will post this on bugs thread if isnt there already. :)