yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] hednik:
At&t doesn't have a stock 4.1.2
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] xBeerdroiDx:
he's correct. actually, if you have any US carrier variant of the S3, you should not be looking at ROMs that are running or support 4.1.2. they are not for your device. stay here in the AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III forum
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] cadorette:
Is this actually true? I am running Liquid Smooth on my US i747 and it's stable, smooth, and amazing fast.. It is 4.2 based..

Not arguing, just curious.. Did I get lucky? :p
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] xBeerdroiDx:
no.

the topic was 4.1.2. not 4.2
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] cadorette:
ah...got it :)
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Bigbabyjesus:
Try team Synergy's SynergyROM. It feels and looks stock but it's really amped up with tons of customization options and floating multi-window.

Don't forget to hit Thanks if I've been helpful.
[Android Apps and Games] andarite:
As far as I know, there is no way to enable USB tethering automatically after plugging in the device. This is the next best thing. When you connect your Android device to your computer, the tethering menu will open automatically.

There are two versions of this app. The regular version works on all devices that support UMS. The compatibility version works on all devices, including those that do not support UMS.

I don't have 10 posts, so I can't make these links, but the URLs are below:

Regular UMS version

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.andarite.usbtetherpopupfree

Compatibility non-UMS version

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.andarite.usbtetherpopup2free

View attachment 1842051View attachment 1842052View attachment 1842053

I hope some of you find this useful.

Thanks,

Andrew
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] darkshadowx07:
Hey guys,

I found a guy (... my brother) who wants my tablet, He did offer $250, what do you think guys? is that a good price? or should I ask for more?

I got this table from Best Buy with a good rebate (like $50), the price was around $250.

With this business "in process".... my next target will be Asus Transformer TF300T (any recommendation at this point will be appreciated)
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] PugeAko:
that offer for a second hand wifi only tab plus is a good deal. Go for it bro :)
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] unclefab:
You bought it 250, used it for a while and want to sell it for 250.

In terms of money it s a good deal, in terms of brotherhood, well, personally I would give my brother a better price, but it s your choice...
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] freak4dell:
And here I was hoping I could get like $180 for mine when I sell it. $250 is a great price for you.
[Samsung Galaxy Tab Plus] darkshadowx07:
Thanks for the advice

Thanks friends for the advices, I was able to sell the tablet just today..... I gave the tablet with a 32gb microSD, Armorsuit screen layer and a nice leather cover, and my brother was actually really happy with the "movement"
[Galaxy S 4 General] system.img:
LTE on the Exynos 5 Octa has been confirmed by Samsung Exynos on twitter.

Source

Samsung Exynos Twitter
[Galaxy S 4 General] j510:
They better release this with exynos to the u.s. at&t!
[Galaxy S 4 General] Closed Source Project:
The answer is easy if you like xda development: the snapdragon!
[Galaxy S 4 General] scott14719:
Just because it supports LTE doesn't mean its going to have LTE. Is there any confirmation that the Octa version will indeed be built with the ability to allow LTE bands or is this just more speculation?
[Galaxy S 4 General] system.img:
If it supports LTE, see no point in Samsung disabling LTE in the S4 Exynos version and then selling it.

I will try to ask Samsung Exynos about it and let's see if they reply!
[Galaxy S 4 General] AndreiLux:
LTE has nothing to do with the Exynos SoC, it's not a part of it. LTE is provided by an external modem chip.

All these articles are written by idiots who can't read the context of the original source, for the sole purpose of getting ad revenue through clicks, at the cost of publishing bull****.

SamsungExynos is the twitter account of Samsung LSI which is the semiconductor division of the Samsung Electronics subsidiary. That tweet was just a PR jab at people telling the Exynos doesn't support LTE.

Of course it does support LTE, as would any other chip on the planet. The interconnect between SoC and modem is something standard and you could probably connect a space station to it if you so wished.

That doesn't mean the S4 Exynos variant / i9500 will have LTE, because it has absolutely nothing to do with the chip itself.

Heck, even they say this in a tweet 8 minutes after the original one: https://twitter.com/SamsungExynos/status/317339669996130306

The device manufacturer in this case is Samsung Electronics consumer electronics division, different than the semiconductor division.

**** mobile industry journalism these days. It's a bunch of baboons flinging **** together and calling it an article.
[Galaxy S 4 General] Thor:
They already replied to someone else who asked. They asked they couldn't confirm it only that the chip supports it. They said to ask Samsung Mobile.

To be honest, while there is no way to know if the SIV has LTE on the i9500 verison, but if the Exynos 5 supports it, Samsung would have been fools not to include it.

Either way, I'm aiming to get the Exynos 5 version, Don't really care about LTE either way yet as still no set release date for it here in Ireland. If Samsung had just gone with the SD600 version alone, then I would have, but since the Exynos 5 will be available in some places at launch or most places shortly after launch, then I will hold off.

Not really sure what Samsung were thinking with this one, they really should have held off on the launch until they could make enough chips. Now they are just going to fragment their own designs with the two different version. Not that it makes a big difference in the long version, but it will for development side of things.

Anyone know where will be selling the Exynos 5 version?
[Galaxy S 4 General] system.img:
Hmm. Your points are absolutely true.

So we have to wait till people gets their units so that we can comfirm whether Samsung has included the LTE chip or not.
[Galaxy S 4 General] AndreiLux:
We don't have to wait for anything, the I9500 model doesn't have an LTE modem, period. It has an Intel XMM6360 DC-HSPA+ modem. This is fact, reality, set in stone.
[Galaxy S 4 General] system.img:
Thanks for the info!
[Galaxy S 4 General] Myreality:
Do you have a source? :fingers-crossed:
[Galaxy S 4 General] :
The Octa LTE version is for Korea only. Lol
[Galaxy S 4 General] hefonthefjords:
Buymobilephones.net

Thats probably where im gonna get mine. It's the only place ive seen so far that is still advertising it as "1.8ghz twin quad core". There are others i have not looked at though such as clove and expansys...

Edit: expansys are selling the exynos at a premium for 589! Clove arent selling the exynos.
[Galaxy S 4 General] uvaman:
He has. One of the clues where chinese guy who dismental s4 and we could see the pictures of all chips and one among them was intel....
[Galaxy S 4 General] legion1911:
Hey Andrei, you remember the millions of articles that wrote that the Exynos 4212 does not support LTE?

And then came GT-I9305. Them idiots will never learn.
[Galaxy S 4 General] darrendm:
buymobilephones.net are unsure of which varient they will recieve and have said on twitter that they will only know when the stock arrives. The "twin quad core" spec description has been there since the device was announced to be containing the octacore.
[Galaxy S 4 General] lgkahn:
lte causes more heat .. could very well be it is not included becuase the exynos also produces more heat than the qualcomm version
[Galaxy S 4 General] yahyoh:
LOL no , its nothing to do with heat + Snapdragon's are know for overheating and throttling :rolleyes:
[Galaxy S 4 General] jtc276:
I heard a random rumor from a terrible source that AT&T's bands support the Octa's LTE and they might be getting that version. There's probably a 1% chance that this is true, but it's worth considering, I guess.
[Galaxy S 4 General] slapdaddy:
I believe we run on the 700MHz band where I live. It would be nice to be able to buy either variant of the phone and still have LTE.

Sent from my HTC Vivid.
[Galaxy S 4 General] BarryH_GEG:
Which Octa? They all support different bands depending on where they are sold. The Korean Exynos/LTE SGS3 had incompatible bands for use in the U.S. Maybe something will change with the Korean SGS4 but the bands Korea uses itself haven't changed.

All LTE N2's are Exynos but none sold unlocked are U.S. compatible either.
[Galaxy S 4 General] jtc276:
No idea. It's probably best to brush this rumor off. It was just a comment from someone saying that it was possible and likely considering AT&T's pricing being so high. While I would like it to be true just for the simple fact that the Octa variant has a Wolfson DAC, I know better than to get my hopes up. It would be nice if AT&T would actually announce the specs of their S4. I mean, really, what's the secret?
[Galaxy S 4 General] BarryH_GEG:
Qualcomm just announced last month that their releasing a multi-band LTE radio that supports all the gazillion LTE bands and frequencies at the h/w level so what a device can support can be controlled with s/w. It'll also support LTE roaming on another carrier's network. Until that happens, to get LTE, you have to buy a device that you know has the h/w support for the bands you know you're going to be using.

Qualcomm Incorporated (NASDAQ: QCOM) today announced that its wholly-owned subsidiary, Qualcomm Technologies, Inc., introduced the Qualcomm RF360 Front End Solution, a comprehensive, system-level solution that addresses cellular radio frequency band fragmentation and enables for the first time a single, global 4G LTE design for mobile devices. Band fragmentation is the biggest obstacle to designing today’s global LTE devices, with 40 cellular radio bands worldwide.​

http://www.qualcomm.com/media/relea...olution-enables-single-global-lte-design-next
[Galaxy S 4 General] legion1911:
What happens if your combine a Exynos 5 SOC with the Qualcomm LTE chip?

GALAXY S4

Exynos 5

2 x 4-Core

LTE (all frequencies of the planet)
[Galaxy S 4 General] Serilei:
I hope they eventually set up everything with Exynos Octa, last time I heard some countries werent getting the exynos. Not fully sure how true that holds, but if it holds truth, I think its bad for Samsung so boast about this and then not give it to people.
[Galaxy S 4 General] Dannar:
Don't you guys care about development? Without the snapdragon, you're stuck without the ability to play around with your device.

Maybe it's a US thing, because our carriers really fudge around with bloatware and pretty much have a totalitarian grip on our devices. Being able to use a custom ROM is a huge benefit, at least in my eyes. Especially with some OEMs track records for updates.

I dunno...the Note 2 is Exynos. How did that turn out? Was it the same for US carriers?

Duely blundered from my thunderdolt.
[Galaxy S 4 General] affan848:
Nice

this is a nice processor
[Galaxy S 4 General] TingTingin:
We do but what u said is incorrect u still have the ability to "play around" with your device just not as much play room snapdragon version

It's going to have more dev support than alot of other devices

S4 INFO

---------- Post added at 10:18 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:17 AM ----------

Don't spam to get your 10 posts

S4 INFO
[Galaxy S 4 General] khein:
The Exynos will have many custom roms, but most of them will be Samsung based(cooked). Though, we might still see some AOSP based ROM with bugs. :P

But I'm buying the S4 because of some features (camera features, sms app, etc) that I like, so even if there will be a stable AOSP rom for the S4, I think I'll still use a cooked Samsung based rom as a daily driver. :)

Though, if ever I'll be buying the HTC One(which might really be the case if the S4 does not arrive within Q2 in my country), I'll definitely put CM or AOKP there, as I'm really not a fan of Sense and probably Blinkfeed also.
[Galaxy S 4 General] legion1911:
NO, I do not care about rom development.

The Stock samsung rom is good enough. Without Samsung software, you have NONE of the cool features they have announced.

NO, Samsung will not give anyone else the source code of their newest features.

Exynos 5 is the first big.LITTLE Processor. Cutting edge A15 technology.

There are so many devices with Snapdragon Krait, but only ONE device with Exynos 5 big.LITTLE 2x4core: S4 GT-I9500.
[Galaxy S 4 General] sorg:
Exynos version will have source code of linux kernel for sure. It's GPL.

And most magic happens in exactly in kernel.

The only problem might be is for AOSP/CM because they need source code for some /system/lib files for better support.

In other words, for most users there won't be any changes in the way how custom ROMs and kernels were developed for SGSII and SGSIII.
[Galaxy S 4 General] legion1911:
The software for the new features is not in the kernel.
[Galaxy S 4 General] TingTingin:
S4 isn't the only device with Exynos 5 Octa

S4 INFO
[Galaxy S 4 General] thekoRngear:
I think what legin1911 wanted to say that currently S4 is the only EXYNOS OCTA device. And in response what you wanted (!) to say that S4 is not the only device with Exynos as Nexus 10 is out with Exynos dual cores.

However, if you told what you wanted to tell then I think S4 currently is the Only official device with Exynos Octa.
[Galaxy S 4 General] legion1911:
My point is:

There are many Snapdragon Krait 4-core devices and many more will come:

HTC One

Sony Xperia Z

Google Nexus 4

LG Electronics Optimus G E975

Sony Xperia ZL

ASUS PadFone 2

Samsung Galaxy S4 GT-I9505

Do you really have to take the Krait S4?

To be able to use the custom ROM some 17-year-old has cooked, a ROM that does not include all Samsung technology features?

I prefer to get the S4 GT-I9500, with cutting edge Exynos 5 A15 big.LITTLE.

And.... it is a dual quadcore and not a 8-core! :p:p:p
[Galaxy S 4 General] Squirrel1620:
Well if Samsung looked at ps3's "cutting edge" cell processor they will learn that changing the architecture will greatly affect compatibility of software :rolleyes:

Although I hope it works out, just looks like a headache for game developers
[Galaxy S 4 General] TingTingin:
That is incorrect and also not what I wanted to say what I said was what I wanted to say

Exynos 5 Octa will be used in other devices except Samsung made one's and has already been officially announced in a particular device the reason I didn't post a link was because I simply couldn't remember the name of the device and I doubted I'd find it after googling since I remember the company being unpopular I ran into it in my feeds a while back but I'll see if I can find

S4 INFO
[Galaxy S 4 General] BarryH_GEG:
That wouldn't be very smart. ;)

PowerVR is in every iPhone and iPad. I'd imagine it's a GPU the developers are quite familiar with. If anything, I'd say it would be easier to port games from iOS to Android because of the commonality.
[Galaxy S 4 General] legion1911:
The other Exynos 5 Octa device is so unimportant and irrelevant that you do not remember the device name and you do not even remember the company name.

You are posting too much irrelevant stuff to promote your S4 Info thread.

Look at the diamonds user BarryH_GEG contributes and learn.
[Galaxy S 4 General] sulabhgupta:
chill guys.
[Galaxy S 4 General] legion1911:
Congratulations! Your post gave you the 10 posts you wanted.
[Galaxy S 4 General] TingTingin:
What are you talking about u take into consideration meaningless things like thanks and post counts?

Anyway u said the s4 was the only device with Octa which makes it better I was informing u that was not the case I don't see what this tantrum is about I actually agreed with you a couple posts earlier

But that Barry part at least made sense

He is a great asset to the community

S4 INFO
[Galaxy S 4 General] legion1911:
Sorry if I was too harsh, but there is truth in what I wrote.

I modified my post. Let us end it here.
[Galaxy S 4 General] TingTingin:
Phew!

Well sorta:thumbup::D

S4 INFO
[Galaxy S 4 General] thekoRngear:
Whether the company being popular or not anyone other than samsung who declares they are gonna use Exynos Octa for sure would flash in news. I googled and I did not find any.

That piece of information I quoted surely needs confirmation.
[Galaxy S 4 General] TingTingin:
I think u missed that

S4 INFO
[Galaxy S 4 General] legion1911:
Google search "Meizu MX3"

Meizu is a very small producer, producing very small quantities of devices with Exynos SOC.

They have done it before so they probably will do it again.
[Galaxy S 4 General] TingTingin:
Thanks I've been racking my brain trying to remember that name

S4 INFO
[Galaxy S 4 General] legion1911:
No problem. :)
[Galaxy S 4 General] thekoRngear:
I searched google with Meizu MX3 and all I got is what is rumored to be packed with that phone including the Exynos 5 Octa: http://www.ubergizmo.com/2013/03/meizu-mx3-might-share-a-close-resemblance-to-the-htc-one/

My question: is this officially announced as per the quote says?
[Galaxy S 4 General] Bagbug:
why do you care ? Are you a mod or just the Ned Flanders of this board ?
[Galaxy S 4 General] notsointeresting:
It's in the XDA rules
[Galaxy S 4 General] BarryH_GEG:
Sigh. Do you guys do any research when forming your opinions? Octa is nothing more than a marketing name that Samsung's assigned to their implementation of big.LITTLE. Octa is the first (and far from the only) commercial implementation of big.LITTLE. Also, all Qualcomm’s chips are based on updates and enhancements to three year old ARM architecture as they license ARM’s designs. ARM's spent two years developing big.LITTLE and it's their next generation architecture. I'd fully expect Qualcomm to move to big.LITTLE for whatever generation of chips they develop past S-800. So you can't really piss on Octa without pissing on ARM which is the same as pissing on Qualcomm who depends on ARM's designs as the basis for all their chips.

If anyone cares about what their pissing on here's the big.LITTLE white paper which explains it and what ARM's rationale was in developing it.

www.arm.com/files/downloads/big.LITTLE_Final.pdf
[Galaxy S 4 General] j510:
Once you go exynos you dont want to go to snapdragon! From personal experience!
[Galaxy S 4 General] legion1911:
I agree 100%.
[Galaxy S 4 General] otester:
After reading AndreiLux, I feel partially relieved in pre-ordering the SD600.
[Galaxy S 4 General] dafabsl:
did you guys already see this

http://www.samsungmobileshop.at/handydetail.php?id=504

official samsung online store - confirming that the i9505 is the octa and it comes with LTE
[Galaxy S 4 General] Squirrel1620:
Very nice, but I somehow doubt that will be available in the us:(

And how will we tell the versions apart if the model number says i9505 but has lte, which model number would it be if it had the octa and no lte?
[Galaxy S 4 General] numb2k3:
One of those times where the US is not getting the best version/edition of a product.
[Galaxy S 4 General] sorg:
It's not confirmation. It's just product info with mistake made either by web designer or content writer (using copy-paste from I9500). Regional Samsung shops are not HQs. Information on regional website go through many hands and easy to mess, especially when there was no clear information which model has Exynos and which is Qualcomm.

But now it's 100% info that I9500 is Exynos+3G, I9505 is Qualcomm+LTE.

You may see many reviews of SGS4 with model name GT-I9505 and see it's Qualcomm. It's simply impossible to make two I9505 with different CPU because ROM will be different and not interchangeable.

You may send message to that shop to ask then to check more carefully specification and if they will, then they will change CPU to Qualcomm on their site.
[Galaxy S 4 General] legion1911:
That Austrian website is not of Samsung.

Look: http://www.samsungmobileshop.at/impressum.php

"smart mobile GmbH" - eBusiness-Partner of Samsung Austria

"smart mobile GmbH" made some error there.

I bet, within next week, that page will change, and all references to Exynos 5 Octa will disappear.

As we all know, I9505 is Snapdragon Krait. Just that eBusiness-Partner of Samsung Austria does not know.

Not so smart, of "Smart Mobile"...

:cowboy:
[Galaxy S 4 General] thekoRngear:
Yes I do research. What I was asking is whether or not that meizu device is announced which has nothing to do with what is quoted.
[Galaxy S 4 General] pack21:
oh i must catch of one of these Exynos LTE.

This proves that this Phone exists and is being hidden due low production capacity.

.
[Galaxy S 4 General] soraxd:
do we know which LTE bands the i9505 (snapdragon) will have? i believe AT&T uses 700/1700/2100, unlike 2g/3g, LTE just says 'YES'..

since I've never had LTE, not sure if it works the same way 3g did..

can anyone who has a little more knowledge on this shed some light on it for me? I'm looking forward to stepping into the LTE club.
[Galaxy S 4 General] SlimJ87D:
There are 20 bands on lte from what I have heard
[Galaxy S 4 General] joedhall:
LTE has 4 bands!

---------- Post added at 08:37 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:32 PM ----------

Should say 44 bands.
[Galaxy S 4 General] Bagbug:
Really ? Wow. Thanks a lot for the news !

What a great rule isnt it ?
[Galaxy S 4 General] soraxd:
rofl, nicely done.

yes, yes it is, shall we disguise the merits of such a rule? ^^
[Galaxy S 4 General] 1337RYoN:
It's probably an exclusive model for the Korean market. Which is why I plan to get one with LTE and Exynos when I go back to Korea later this month :D. Since it has a separate modem, it should work with 20 LTE bands, meaning that I'll be able to use it in Singapore and Korea when I travel.
[Galaxy S 4 General] legion1911:
Since it is tradition in Korea to sell devices with a simlock, i hope you know how to unlock that korean device.

Without unlock you do not even have GSM.

I hope for you it is the s4 international and not the Korean special version Samsung often builds (a device nobody outside Korea cares to unlock).
[Galaxy S 4 General] TingTingin:
If someone is spamming to receive 10 posts it means that their end goal is to spam the development section

If the development section starts getting spammed then devs won't be able to well develop since this is simply a hobby it won't take long before the devs just pack up and leave

And I care about development so that's why told the user to stop spamming to get his 10 posts and get them like everyone else

And though your post was said sarcastically I'll say yes anyway it is a great rule

But this thread isn't too discuss Xda's rules if you want to discuss the rules go here

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1987254

Word of advice don't bring up that 10 post thing :D

S4 INFO