yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] noobsgs2:
Well if i have to be honest i9500 will have plenty of love... if CM will not support it other will and someone will come up with a really stable and powerfull rom, same goes for kernel (assuming that samsung will release source).

Wont take long to have octa on other brand and they will probably share half of the code/kernel, it will be the same as snap4.

As soon as i9500 share the same RIL/Camera/Sensors ecc of i9505 there will be no problem at all. Still lots of work to do

If i will take the fly for canada around the 1st may i will check @ BestBuy for Exynos Octa
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] climo:
:good: The way I see it the 'REAL' (as Samsung originally intended) S4 is the Exynos version and the 'stand in' (due to chip manufacturing problems) is the Snapdragon version. But like 1337RYoN suggested above it just depends on what you plan to do with it. Both will be supported by devs but in different ways.
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dafabsl:
AW: Developer support for I9500 and I9505?

I really think that after the summer and after the delivery problems of the exynos and the 9500, the 9500 will be the more popular device. Because i really think that, no mather what, there will be many developers for the exynos, BECAUSE it's new to develop for.

I think the 9505 is just a device made for the problems with the production of the 9500..

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9000 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] 1337RYoN:
Yeah honestly Snapdragon 600 is the stand in. I mean, Samsung obviously wants to show off their latest chip that is ultra fast and ultra battery efficient at the same time. People who are anxious about dev support can count on plenty of love for both devices.

And hopefully Samsung will try to encourage more devs to develop for I9500 and release the source for Exynos Octa.
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dafabsl:
AW: Developer support for I9500 and I9505?

I decided to buy the 9500

I only have to search a retailer that ships to austria..

Any ideas? Maybe from a german shop or smth..
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] TAT1980:
We dont geht the exynos core in germany. Only snapdragon.why ever

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9300 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] -]Megacharge[-:
I9505 for me, if I end up with an S4. I'm probably the only guy here who isn't even the slightest bit interested in the Exynos variant.
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] -]Megacharge[-:
How do you know if Exynos is going to be available in Canada?
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] damador:
not only one :-p i also prefer snapdragon
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zelendel:
Guys you put too much stock into if someone else will develop for a device. Will it have roms. Oh I am sure there will be plenty until the next big device comes out and then people will leave this for the next big device.

The only developer you should worry about supporting a device is yourself. If a device has custom roms is NEVER something you should consider when buying a device.
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] vyper91:
i don't agree, i tend to get quite bored of things rather quickly which is why I abandoned iOS.

My S3 might have been swapped for another device if it was stuck on stock, because I would eventually grow tired of it.

I like the fact that every now and then I can try a new ROM and gain additional features and control over my device, and I also have grown tired of touchwiz and respect the fact Samsung want to build their own brand image but I much prefer the Holo theme running constantly on my device and I like having Android on my phone the way it was intended by Google.

On the S3 giving up Touchwiz meant I lost Smart Stay (battery drain that I don't need), Pop out play (only used when demo-ing to friends how cool it is), Blocking Mode (ok this is one feature I do actually miss) and the samsung camera (but to be honest I just take standard photos so AOSP camera is fine).

On the S4 I'll be giving up more features, but during the launch presentation none of them really bothered me, I just liked the fact that the phone had awesome specs.

I think custom ROMS is a completely fine argument to throw into a discussion when choosing a new device, after all I am browsing XDA so it shows I have a keen interest in this aspect, my priority is choosing the phone with the best specs that suit me, but not at the expense of being locked into software I don't want.

For example, the Chromebook Pixel is somewhat enticing to me because I can install a Linux distribution onto it and have more control over what I can do with the hardware, but I wouldn't buy it if I was locked into the Chrome OS.
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zelendel:
Then you are here for the wrong reasons. XDA is about development and learning to develop yourself, custom roms are a by product of it. If you like pure android so much you should grab a nexus. Mainly due to the Nexus hardware being built to run the AOSP drivers unlike OEM devices. This is the reason AOSP based roms wull always have issues and bugs on said devices.
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dafabsl:
that's not true, for example the Galaxy S GT I9000 still has many developers supporting this device, for more than 3 years
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zelendel:
Oh I know but the great thing about the early GS series is that they were all alike minus a few things. Most of the dev going on for them are from build bots for like AOKP and CM. With the major diffs in the newer line you will see a big diff. Take the S3 for example. One has alot more Development going on for it in AOSP while the other is getting TW development. (if you can call it that, due to the crappy exynos chip) Now I know alot of you are still new to this world but I have seen it time and time again. The big developers will get the next big thing that comes out and alot are going Sony and leaving samsung all together, just like they did for Moto and HTC.

Just watch and see. The min the S5 comes out it will be the same thing all over again. Devs will be seeling their s4 to update.
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] vyper91:
To be honest I upgrade my phone every time a new flagship releases also so this doesn't phase me, and I know Nexus handsets are better for running AOSP but at the current moment the HTC One / S4 are better than the N4 + I have LTE.

The next Nexus phone may well be one I get if the specs line up with the HTC and S4, and if the design is good.

If anything due to their low price I would maybe even make a little profit selling the previous handset to get the nexus.

I know XDA isn't primarily about custom ROMS, but for people like me who currently do not have time to learn how to tinker with source code I would rather try a more dedicated developers work, giving feedback along the way and being part of the sub-community.

It's almost like saying XDA isn't here to advise you on new apps developers have made, you should learn to write them yourself.

I am happy to accept flaws in builds I do not require a rock-solid handset as I have a spare phone too, and like I said it's the community aspect I enjoy also.

S3 wise, the only flaw I really see is not using MHL which only affects me as I would like to buy this Pioneer car head unit that uses MHL to connect to your phone, otherwise I don't use it.

The main piece of hardware I wish to stay intact through custom ROMS on the S4 however, I will admit, is the IR blaster as it is a feature I've wanted to have on my phone for years now, but I'm hoping the i9505 might be easier to develop for in respects to individual components being used, but I'm not an expert so I have no idea.
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zelendel:
Not trying to be rude but its not. It is here to teach you to do it yourself. This is a developers forum. Made for Developers by Developers.

This I would like as well as it is something I have been waiting on but it will be a while before the AOSP can use that part of the hardware as the drivers and what not will most likely be closed sourced like alot of the S3 and S4 features.
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] vyper91:
This is one of the reasons I am so confused in this toss-up between the S4 and the HTC One, because if I did have to stick with their stock firmwares I think I would prefer Sense. Maybe this is because I haven't used Sense since the Desire HD, but to be honest the flat design I personally gives off a higher aesthetic appeal.

Also, I meant my comment in the way that, XDA isn't here to show you new apps made by developers, it's just one OF the many reasons people visit the website. XDA may have started as a pure development forum for devs by devs, but whether good or bad, it's reputation has now grown to the level where people who most certainly aren't developers visit and like to get involved.
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zelendel:
Oh I have no prob with people getting involved. Heck that is how people learn. I know what the new rep of XDA is becoming and it is something we are trying to fix. We have even opened a whole new section to help people learn to be developers. Check out XDA U.

Either way I have made my point and not one to be a dead horse. Also one of my "famous" posts says just what alot of people old and new feel. Click my banner to read it.

Wayne Tech S-III
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Canard caché:
i9505 for me... why? LTE support.

And when you'll sell the s4 for the s5 i'm sure that will be relevant ^^
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Zahid Ali:
But snapdragon phones always had heating issues :(
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] RockRatt:
I am gonna go melt butter RIGHT NOW lol
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] i9100g user:
?

Marketing.

sent from an Galaxy s3 GT I9300

Running perseus kernel 33.1 , XELLA 4.1.2 leaked build

:D xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1784401

The other side of XDA :rolleyes:
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] vijai2011:
Well if they show Competitor A and B making BBQ that would make it good marketing ;)
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] krabman:
I hear what you are saying but this is one of those deals where what you want and what someone else wants is not the same thing. Many people come here strictly for the roms, mods, themes etc. and have no desire to learn nor will they. My guess would be these people far outnumber the ones who actually do develop anything and massively so which means that the site traffic would plummet without them and even a pathetic old man like me knows what that means to a website. I'm sure the admin is far more knowledgeable about this than I am and there is a reason why the site does not require someone to submit their own original work before they can download someone elses which would very quickly attain the goal of making the site for developers by developers as said and also much much smaller since very few of those people would pick up the gauntlet.
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zelendel:
And that is why developers are either leaving or or sharing their work with other developers. Would we lose people coming to the site? Oh I am sure. Would the site continue? Yup just as it did before the influx of what alot of developers are calling "the death of XDA." Coming to a developers site for just roms is not the best idea as any and everything done here voids your warranty and there is no promise that anything flashed will not brick your device.

As much as I hate to say it you are right. And soon if this doesnt change we will have lost all real developers to other sites and then people will have to do what we did in the begining. Learn to do it ourselves.
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] krabman:
lol I started screwing around with this stuff back in WP5 and it wasn't long before I managed to kill a handset. Just missed one itsy bitsy teeny tiny step.... :) I've been learning all along cause I'm just that type that likes to learn but I'll never be what some of these young folks are because I simply don't have the time or in some respects, the knack.

Still for all that I don't think I'm the type that is screwing it up, I read, pay attention, try and learn how to do things, take care of myself, don't expect to be spoon fed. I'm not so sure about the site dying off though, at this point the site as a ROM factory has taken on a life of its own. I don't really have a guess as to where that road would lead.
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tungzta:
Being in the USA, it's all about that LTE for me. I hardly play games on my phone, and ever since I put CM on my phone, I've come to realize just how annoying bloatware can be; so developer support is a big issue for me.
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zelendel:
Then I would rethink the S4 all together as all CM Samsung maintainers have already stated they are leaving Samsung all together for either Sony or the nexus

Wayne Tech S-III
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] JasonJoel:
There will be others that make cm for s4... Although some great developers are leaving there are other great ones right behind them that want cm on s4.

It will be fine.
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zelendel:
Oh I'm sure there will be. They will be starting from scratch but I'm sure plenty of unofficial roms will popup.

Wayne Tech S-III
[Galaxy S 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] t00dy:
maybe team Hacksung will change their minds, as sammy released source code of the kernels

http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/19/...nel-source/?utm_medium=feed&utm_source=feedly
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] futurete:
Hi!

I have a GNex with 4.2.2 firmware and a Jabra Wave+ bt headset.

I tried to use BTMONO app to pick audio from BT when recording video.

Igcamcorder app let me choose to record the audio from the external mic instead of the terminal mic.

This configuration works very well with the Galaxy tab 2 10.1 and the same BT headset when activating BTMONO, but when using Galaxy Nexus its continue to use internal mic.

I really appreciate to use Galaxy Nexus with external BT mic. With this configuration i will be able to do professional video recording (Full HD and decent audio) with a very portable hardware.

Please let me know if there is a solution, even hacking firmware or using another app.

Thanks in advance,

Alessandro
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 General] MADmanFREE:
The XDA screen struggled in daylight, I hope that this is improved. The brightness on some iPaq's is meant to be 'blinding', any news on the XDA II...

Good to see the now normal 64k colour screen. This shall go a long way in clearing up things. Using downloaded themes from the internet was touch and go. I ended up using a Monsters Inc cartoon theme as anything with people in it was just laughable!

I have sold my XDA, after nearly 14 months I have moved on. I am now using a S-E T610. This is a mobile phone, something that the XDA struggled with in my opinion. I look forward to see what happens in the new year... This will determine whether I buy an iPaq 2210 (£300 on http://www.ebuyer.com) or the XDA II tba £500+ . . .

Martin
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 General] Jason0815:
I got a MDA II for testing (only a few days :cry: )

I have a MDA and what could i say

The difference is like night an day!!

The Display is bright clear and "sharper"

The thing i didn´t managed is to get in bootloader Mode :x

The MDA way is doing a cold reset on a MDA II

Are there Infos around to get in Wallaby Mode.

In that case there is a chance that i could share

the ROM Image for the public :twisted:
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 General] gazzaman2k:
LMFAO ROFL

t610 have the worst screen clearity out lol you cant see them in sunlight one bit and your complaining about the xda lol

sorry just made me laugh my xda seems fine much clearer then the 3650
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 General] shire29:
re

I gotta agree with gazzaman2k.

I work part time in a UK phone shop and we have had more T610s returned than any other current phone. Not for technical reasons but because of complaints that they simply can't see the screen in sunlight.

A shame because apart from that the T610 is a fantastic phone.

Cheers, Shire
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 General] cgigate:
All Color LCD (back light style, all PDA and phones) is not easy to read under sunshine!

the old non-color phone is very clear under sunshine!
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 General] MADmanFREE:
Walking down street today tring to ring somebody on my T610. I went and hid in the shadows of a nearby door way trying to see the daft thing.

Maybe in the future something can be done? My old Siemens c35i is sat in the draw maybe I should get that back out for use in the summer!!
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 General] cruisin-thru:
From what I have seen of Palm screens in daylight, they should all be returned. I have an ipaq and xda and also an Axim x5, I like the xda screen, only problem is we cant do much about the backlight intensity except off/on, can this be hacked or is it hardware limited?
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 General] MADmanFREE:
there was a link somewhere on this site that took you to an ipaq hack site. I followed the reg hack, and was presented with the brightness tab. I adjusted this to see what would happen. Nothing, the settings had no effect. Except at either extreem where it was either off or on.

So it must be a hardware limitation, as a software hack did not help.
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 General] sunny127:
My XDA II broke, and I bough MDA II.

The maximum screen brightness on the MDA II is much lower than on the XDA II.

I've opened them both up.

They are diferent from the inside!

Images os the two devices attached, MDA on the left, XDA on the right.

Their screens are different!

Even some memory chips seem to be different!

It's impossible to swich their screens or motherboards.

It seems that MDA II is an older version of the XDA, with an older, much darker screen.

:(
[MDA II, XDA II, 2060 General] kgx:
Himalayas got 2 types of display - old and new connector.

Check serial number , it should be something like this S/N HTxxxxxxxxxx.

Devices with number lower than HT419 got old display, with higher than HT419 got new display.
[One (M7) General] wunmi30:
Hi im new here and want to know how to unroot my evo 3d phone
[One (M7) General] AttachedSilver:
By going to the proper forum
[One (M7) General] Joshnor713:
Hahaha
[One (M7) General] SuperSonicEJ8:
bahahahahhaahahhaa is it sad that this thread made my day?
[One (M7) General] abhs89:
Hi

I have had the phone for a couple of days now and loving it however, I have noticed that when I call someone there will not be able to hear me speak for the first 5-10seconds and then they can does anyone else have this problem.

Thanks
[One (M7) General] DynamicRam:
I had the same thing on my nexus 4 on 4.2.1 it is now fixed on 4.2.2 or may be cm10.1 fixed it
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] Orochixxx:
AdrenoBooster for GB Devices Worked my Lwww

Thanks to Spizzy01 :good:

installation & Guıde

Orginal Thread

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2167228

Antutu Benchmark Score my Wt19i

Gb v62 1.4 GHZ test

GB v62 1.9 GHZ test
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] str3tch72:
Odp: [MOD][GB] AdrenoBooster Worked MDPI Phone

Can I use it with CM7? Is it compatible with all GB based roms?

Send from SK17i by atomic wind powered by CM7.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] Orochixxx:
ım not test CM7 :confused: try it :p
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] kuriboo:
Hey its just fake or really tweak our gpu?

---------- Post added at 11:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:21 PM ----------

Please update this thread if it availabe for ics :D
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] Aayushya:
hey it works wid ICS or not?
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] Blantosz:
This wasn't working for me but i fixed it.

I change first line in file 93adreno

from:

#!/sbin/sh

to:

#!/system/bin/sh

My device: Xperia Active | Stock kernel | Stock GB ROM
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] lsander:
yaa great score but give us result in antutu without oc. I cant do this myslef because I dont have gb installed
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] Blantosz:
I have 7300 in atutu without oc
[Optimus One, P500, V Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mn1968:
Solved: Hopefully this helps someone else. I uninstalled all LG drivers from my PC. Then I connected my phone in via usb and checked my device drivers and updated them. However, rather than letting Windows find the best MTP drivers I chose to browse my computer and picked from a list on my PC. I selected the Linux drivers and everything works perfectly now,

I have a P509 running WC’s AOKP Milestone #6 but I did something stupid…while cleaning up files and programs I uninstalled my LG usb driver for my P509 and now I can’t get the PC to recognize the phone. I run W7 64 bit and it just won’t connect - not even from recovery. On another XP PC it connects no problem (it has LG driver 4.9.4 installed although I don’t recall installing it) and my laptop running W7 64 bit connects no problem either (it has LG driver 3.6 installed, but again I don’t recall installing it on the laptop either). Installing 4.9.4 or 3.6 on my problem PC doesn’t help. I keep getting an error that “MTP… whatever” failed. It’s driving me nuts. I can use the other computers if I need to but the problem PC is my main unit and more convenient to use for all my needs. Also, the phone is recognized by my work PC which has no LG drivers installed at all, nor could I if I wanted to as I don't have admin rights.

Any suggestions for my W7 PC?

Thanks,
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] Renwark-Zipper:
Howdy XDA peoples, I'm not too handy with the search bar and I haven't come across a thread for this yet so...

​

>What is the fastest ROM for the Verizon Galaxy SIII? I'm going for minimal amounts of crap, as clean as they come, and as fast as they come.

​

>Also, Stock or AOSP, which is faster? I imagine AOSP.

​

>I'm not looking for kernel compatibility, which ROM is the fastest, just the ROM alone.

:good:THANKS IN ADVANCE!:good:
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] PsiPhiDan:
I personally find the fastest to be LiquidSmooth.

But no question you can narrow your search down to AOSP ROMs. :)
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] Renwark-Zipper:
What about...

What about Pure AOSP? Would that be faster or does liquid smooth actually have performance modifications and tweaks?
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] emarietta:
It might not be minimal but beans 13 with tk kernel is the best set up I've used. In my opinion I prefer tw over aosp. No lag at all and great battery life
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] Renwark-Zipper:
AOSP ftw

I'm an AOSP guy personally, but I do greatly appreciate your input!
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] ddurandSGS3:
theres an entire original development section here. do some research and find what works best for you and what you need out of a rom.

being fast isnt a valid criteria.

nobody can answer this question except for you. put in a little effort, do some learning/reading, itll serve you well.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] landshark68:
Here you go. All your questions answered:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1950824
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] chrootz:
Carbon ROM 3/15 nightly build with KT kernel is FAST no crap bloat apps. I am running ktoonservative/bfg on Carbon ROM 3-15 build. I couldn't believe it last 2 days 0h 38m at 16% left battery and got 3 hrs 24 mins screen. Thanks to [Team Kernelizers][How To][TK Mod 1.0.1] Updated 03-21-13 KT747 Kernel Tweaks
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] Renwark-Zipper:
I'm really just looking to see what others experiences have been, I've had my fair share of ROMs on this thing. Not as many stock, as I always felt they were slower, but still, plenty.

I also have done PLENTY of reading, hence the reason why I have never had to make a post before, I find my questions answers in my reading.

So I take offense to your comment ddurand. I'd like personal preference and input, not criticism on my research techniques.