yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] blackknightavalon:
So download a third-party launcher like DxTop Pro.
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] Kenneth000:
Good Luck you are the King!! :victory: :victory: :victory:
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] Shaaan:
Please don't do the same source fiasco you did for the ace. I already requested you twice to provide the source. You are completely ignoring my posts.

Atleast come up with some kind of communication!

I do not respond to tech support via PM
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] Shaaan:
I know about GPL. I also understand that he isn't bound to release it until he posts the rom. But the source can be useful for other novathor devices!

If he doesn't want to release it, he can say it upright!

As far as your thought 'i cannot help with cm development ', well i cannot do anything for that!

I do not respond to tech support via PM
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] mermigas:
I hate touch wiz and all sammy crap.

Samsung is a better phone with

aosp -cm
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] [GS]:
Where is Maclaw? anything new? :good:
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] stroobach:
Dear everyone that is following this.

Its done when its done. Dont ask for etas. Its kinda rude

Thx

*insert text here*
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] thejester123:
Well said :)

Sent from my GT-I8190
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] lupohirp:
hi maclaw...i want to help you to make cm10....please can you share your sources with me?:)
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] Benzonat0r:
Please Maclaw share your sources on github. This forum is about helping people, come on fella. ;)
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] efaustino84:
if you want to while away time while you wait for that fish to bite

take a look at the 4.1 rom that Benz has released

be warned

it eats virgin phones like there is no tomorrow
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] New Macław:
Odp: [DEV][MaclawStudio] CyanogenMod for Galaxy S3 Mini

Maybe it'll surprise some of you, but I don't spend all my time online.

I didn't decided what to do about sources already, it's too early. We'll see after release, but you can be sure every REAL developer will get my sources and help. I hate modders, I had too much problems with them on Ace & Gio.

Last time, when I tried to go back to open source, one team used my source and then they said that I stolen (wtf? how could I stole something on open license?) their source. Almost everybody believed their and people were hating me, so I decided to stop android development for something about 5 months.

That's why I don't know yet what to do with sources.

If you can't understand that, I don't care. I'll continue my work with your bless or without.

But, as I said, I'll help every real developer with similar devices. But after first release, not now.

Next thing: don't ask me for ETA, I won't give you any data. I don't know where it will be.

Any other question?

Wysyłane z mojego GT-I8190 za pomocą Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] lupohirp:
you're right maclaw but i want only to help...i have also a gsIII mini.....if you want help you can share your sources with me in private :)
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] papski2:
Odp: Team Work

Shouldnt be posted here, sorry
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] Benzonat0r:
Yes papski2 we can all read that, try to keep up ok? Thank you...
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] papski2:
Odp: [DEV][MaclawStudio] CyanogenMod for Galaxy S3 Mini

Jesus christ. Its all tapatalk fault, i wanted to post it in s advance forum. I am so sorry guys :(
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] New Macław:
Ok, I just compiled AOSP 4.2.2 for test only (I wanted to check something for hw acceleration), will test in the evening.
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] mermigas:
To go directly to 4.2.2 I think is the best option
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] Benzonat0r:
No it's not the best option. Going to 4.2.2 directly would actually cause more problems than it's all worth.
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] New Macław:
Exacly, that's why it's only for test something ;)
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] Benzonat0r:
I know, keep up the good work. :)
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] DarKKnighTR:
I wait the Otg :)) I hope the Otg support comes with next version. :)
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] New Macław:
I hate your post. I hate all posts like that.
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] tys0n:
Sv: [DEV][MaclawStudio] CyanogenMod for Galaxy S3 Mini

All this otg requests.. Isn't it better to first get a stable CM?

Otg on this device requires an external usb hub and power source. For me it isn't even interesting.

Sent through time and space from my s3mini.
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] das.dian24:
All these request they thought its that easy..why not make ur own rom with those features your askin?

Sent from my GT-I8190 using the palm of my hand!
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] Eskuero:
Something that makes me to laught is that I've been more than 3 hours talking to you over gtalk giving you the proper patchs to make the ROM to work as I get it and now you say you're not going to release the changes you made over my tree to make MTP and Mobiledata to work.

I'm completely sure you didn't make a new device tree, because it tooks two and half months to start understanding things and be able to fix every thing is actually working.

1 - You may be one hundred times more experimented than me, but I'm sure if it's impossible than since Saturday you understand everything at least a bit. So I'm sure "your tree" is my tree with a few modifications, than means that you MUST TO RELEASE IT

2 - I also told you that you're able to use my tree as base if you keep the credits I put on the thread about Alpha5, something I can't see anywhere.

3 - I've read about you thousands of times, and not exactly kind words, I really expected you're not like that, but looks like the information isn't wrong. Asking for donations before releasing nothing and taking a nearly fully working device tree as base.:good:

Nice to meet you!:highfive:

P.D: I've been waiting your answer over gtalk since sunday morning. :)

P.D2: I've also changed my license into GNU, so now every modified distrbuted version of my work must to be released as source code.

https://github.com/OliverG96/androi...mmit/a03e0bab2b42901071a771fbae529dd9866a4b10
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] dariolob:
I don't know Maclaw's past history very well but IMO we should give him some time. Everything will come at the right time, there's just too much pressure on him now. I repeat, I do not know him and his story in details but I think we should just wait for his first release, then complying with GPL and xda rules sources will be released :)
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] CallMeVentus:
We used to say that . We were wrong .

My life has more downs than ups, but I try to keep it a balance.
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] fedevd:
Search Maclaw on Google, forums, Youtube and you will know why a lot of people hate and dissacredit him

Enviado desde mi GT-I9070 usando Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] gegode:
well somehow this thread become "drama"

sh*t happens , move on!

BACK TO TOPIC
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] iKlutz:
So from what I gathered by googling, he may or may not have stolen or claimed some work his own. That was difficult to find and what happened is very vague. I did find a lot of people appreciate your work.

I'm not going to judge but please work with the other devs and if you pull this off, you'll have my thanks and probably everyone else's.

Sent from the dark side using my gt-I8190
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] ztandroid:
This thing is getting complicated day by day. As far as I know, there's only 2 dev that have the capability to make CM works in our device, oliver and maclaw (cmiiw). And oliver decided to take a rest for a while, there's only maclaw for now. I don't want to make a judjgement someone from his past and other side it,s not possible to forbid devs to ask source. We just want to make our gs3 mini usable and more valuable.
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] das.dian24:
Ive already seen this on ace development..why dont you guys just wait and give maclaw some time..he already said, hel'll release the sources after he release the frst usable CM..anyways no offense intended here.. cheers :D

Sent from my GT-I8190 using The Palm of My Hand
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] Shaaan:
Now people stop worshipping maclaw. I don't have any personal grudge against him, but i do hate his methodology!

If you are saying that we are pressuring him, you are wrong. I haven't done anything yet.

The creation of this thread itself is breaking xda rules. As maclaw puts in the thread title, [DEV] means discussion. So sharing the source is necessary! If the source isn't shared, it becomes a placeholder thread for a future rom which is against xda rules.

So stop whining against me or anyone who asked for the source!

I do not respond to tech support via PM
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] K.A.:
Yup. This is infact nothing more than a placeholder thread. If you absolutely must have it, It should be in the general section. No downloads, No sources = placeholder thread.
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] ztandroid:
The key for this thing is 'patience'. We have maclaw words "he will help another device that similliar with gs3 mini". Tell me why we must not believe his words?
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] CallMeVentus:
Once a villan , always a villan , don't you hear ?

My life has more downs than ups, but I try to keep it a balance.
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] mermigas:
From my past experience with CM and Galaxy S I've seen this kind a discussion numerous times with fatal results over the development. So the only devs I trust are the ones coming from CM team. Nevertheless during experimental stages the sources were not public but only shared between the devs.

So I only hope for CM team to step in with an "official" developer and sort things out
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] shut_down:
I am curious, why this well known dev is having new nick name??? You got banned before? :P
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] tys0n:
Afaik he left by free will, but i'm sure he can speak for himself.:rolleyes:
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] lupohirp:
it is also me that i can help....i ported cm9 and cm10 on lg optimus one....i want to help but it is better start from working sources than from zero no? anyway if he doesn't want my help i don't criticize him.....i understand and respect his decision and his work :)
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] ztandroid:
I understand that. But this is the only chance to make CM works for now (oliver has take a rest). Otherwise, waiting official CM's feels like being fish waiting for having feet. If this situation is getting worse, we may never see CM on our device. I'm not defending anyone here but our devices.
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] [GS]:
Dont ask anytime for source! source source source ... its his work
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] ppero196:
:banghead:
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] blackknightavalon:
Reminds me of the "undeadk9" fiasco over in the MT4GS forums. For a while he was the only dev keeping that device afloat but he got banned because it was a puppy account of a guy who had kanged on a previous device. Let's just wait and see.
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] ppero196:
*grabs popcorn* :D

Seriously guys. Stop with the fighting.

Altough i am a little sceptical about Maclaw's history, he sound like a good guy. Olliver and him are for now our only hope for CM.

Altough, he should publish the sources.

Every dev i know has published them. Also it makes people happy to know what the next build might contain.
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] AtoZ0to9:
Should be fun to follow the thread... :p

Insert sig here...
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] mermigas:
According to CM team member

Quote

CyanogenMod is a community project and an open-source project. Anyone can work on it as long as they label it as unofficial.

Unquote
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] Robi959:
If you people want cm for sgs3 mini, then shut up and wait. Don't judge or something. Othervise open your own thread and make your own cm ;)
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] CallMeVentus:
Good luck .

My life has more downs than ups, but I try to keep it a balance.
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] ztandroid:
And then we're happy to have you.

That thing is our problematic issue, let's wait how it's end.
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] Shaaan:
His work? Please elaborate!

Just because he compiles it, it doesn't become his work..

Also, it's in the spirit of open-source to share the source..

I do not respond to tech support via PM
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] Shaaan:
So basically, you are ready to even become his servant if he gives you cm? -_-

I do not respond to tech support via PM
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] ztandroid:
Lol. Excuse me sir?? As I said, I'm not defending someone, but our devices. My life will not end if no CM for me. Well, you're contaminated with your own hates.
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] AtoZ0to9:
Y'all should fight about it... Kung fu style...

Insert sig here...
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] iKlutz:
I'm gonna trade my phone in for a nexus tab or something.. Sitting here waiting for kids to stop squabbling over who owns what corner of the forum and i am considering either getting another phone or trying to make cm myself.

Sent from the dark side using my gt-I8190

---------- Post added at 11:52 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:50 AM ----------

I'm subscribed to this thread and my phone keeps buzzing, so I open xda to see the good news and it's just blue vs red the forum game.

Sent from the dark side using my gt-I8190
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] CallMeVentus:
Shaaan , forget it . Leave them alone .

My life has more downs than ups, but I try to keep it a balance.
[Galaxy S III Mini Android Development] PG101:
Thread Closed - No placeholders as per XDA rules and members should not be directed to another site.
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] SJGSM:
http://es.engadget.com/2013/03/15/samsung-gamepad-telefonos-grandes-galaxy-note/

:beer:
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] SJGSM:
http://es.engadget.com/2013/03/15/samsung-galaxy-s-4-gamepad-juegos/

:D
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] SJGSM:
It does, look at the video:p

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLIphzzNHRk&feature=youtube_gdata_player

;)
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] NZtechfreak:
...and note that the S4 is docked into a Smart Dock in that video...
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] H3llb0und:
It's on the S4 mini site:

http://www.samsung.com/global/microsite/galaxys4/
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] soraxd:
WILL....BUYY.......!!!!!
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] alicepattinson:
That's so cute :highfive:
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] CreepyDroid:
Demo video

[YOUTUBE]eDkIthBjRI8[/YOUTUBE]

and from Sammobile
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] NuclearEMP:
good thing i bought my Smart dock :)
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] NZtechfreak:
Despite being one of the first to actually use a Smart Dock I only just actually purchased one after seeing another video from last week showing the S4 on one!
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] msavic6:
Any idea how much the game pad should cost roughly? I'm thinking in the $100 range.
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] subet:
Do you know the price of this?
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] Dannyada1988:
With the game pad, S4 seems to be competitive compared to the upcoming PS 4.
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] jay2the1:
All they need is an app that can stream and control a game that is being played from your computer and they will have destroyed nvidias project shield before it comes out.

This using your phone as a games console is the future, all we need is better titles, but that is easier said than done.
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] SaschaHa:
Here my gamepad for Note 2 :good::D
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] stretched:
I'd like to see something more like this http://www.nuvogadgets.com/

Takes up less space. The touch screen buttons should be enough. Hopefully they make one for the S4
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] DrkChalice:
seems a little unnecessary but neat
[Galaxy S 4 Accessories] MultipleOutput:
113 is an odd price
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] domino138:
First of all, I'd like to thank everyone who posts to this forum - I've been reading it for a month or so now and am constantly impressed with the quality of the knowledge here, especially the developers...

I have a QTEK 1010 bought here in Dubai, UAE, with the following device info:

ROM version: 4.00.01 ENG

ROM date: 05/16/03

Radio version: 3.23.01

Protocol version: 32S54

I have found that browsing using IE

feels

slower, and have the feeling that this version of the ROM does not work well with the radio version. Does anyone reading this forum live in the UAE? I'd like to upgrade the Radio, but need to know which version works best with Etisalat (our Telco).

Any comments much appreciated!

Thanks, Doms...

P.S. I'm going to upgrade the ROM to 4.00.05 when I get the opportunity
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] kamiar:
hi, i am from dubai and i am using 4.00.1 from t-mobile and 4.21 from o2, so far everything fine just when i reset the t-mobile logo appears.

do you have bluetooth option in that version and your version was already installed or you upgraded yourself?
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] ARZLEB:
Use the o2 Radio Version 4.21 it will work fine...

:)
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] domino138:
Thanks for the responses guys. Does this new radio version provide any benefits over the one I have?

1) The QTEK does not support Bluetooth, and there is no way to make it work on a QTEK either.

2) There is no Bluetooth option in any of my menus or settings (I would expect this as my device does not support Bluetooth). Windows PPC2003 is supposed to be able to support Bluetooth, however: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsmobile/products/pocketpc/about/2003/bluetooth.mspx

3) I upgraded to the 4.00.05 version of Windows PPC2003 myself using Jeff's ROM Kitchen (thanks Jeff!) http://cuba.calyx.nl/~jsummers/ROMkitchen/
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] kamiar:
Hi, Once i had 4.00.01 and in connection setting i had Bluetooth option but ofcourse it was not working, the other thing is do you know any camera work with SD port of Qtek? i mean something availble in the market.

4.21 is more stable i think.

cheers,
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] domino138:
I had some problems when making calls on my QTEK yesterday. While in a voice conversation audible clicking noises can be heard and after about 1 minute of conversation the quality of the call deteriorates until the other party cannot hear me. I'll try upgrading the radio...

I don't know about the camera support using the SD slot in the QTEK. My first instinct would be to say no, it's not possible, but I can't confirm that...
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] benbattle:
I bought a Qtek 1010 in Dubai Duty Free the other week. I've since upgraded the ROM using ROMkitchen and am delighted with it. One thing I did notice though is that the speakerphone functionality (claimed in the Qtek handbook) doesn't seem to work. I didn't try it before I upgraded so can someone tell me if it works with the native UAE ROM code, and if so does anyone have any idea how I could get it working again?

David
[MDA, XDA, 1010 Software Upgrading] ridaz:
I own a QTEK in the UAE and here is my share to those asking about OS and Radio updates here:

I upgraded from

ROM version: SER 1.2

Radio version: 3.23.01

To

ROM version: 4.00.10 ENG (T.Mobile Test)

Radio version: 4.21.00 (O2 UK)

Everyting seems to work fine apart from 2 minor issues so far:

Make sure you set your band to 900Europe as the default is 1900North America in phone/tools/options

The signal fades out sometimes but doznt affect the reception

No G signal but GPRS is OK.

GPRS stays connected; have to turn phone off and on to disconnect.

Advice:

Read a lot before you upgrade. This forum has a wealth of information.

Cheers

ridaz
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] SanDiegoHB:
Sprint Galaxy Nexus, purchased a couple months ago, currently unlocked and UNrooted, android 4.2.1, stock kernel, GA02 build and CDMA/LTE radios. Previously tried FC12 and FH05 radios with mixed results.

Voice quality of the person with whom I'm speaking is horrible; distorted and tinny. Have to switch back to GS3 when it becomes unbearable.

Is this a general experience or is there a fix I can try?

Thank you in advance!!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] spjetrovic:
Same here VZW GNEX on 4.2.2 when on a call ppl keep saying can you please speak up I can't hear you.

Any suggestions are appreciated!!!

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] namtombout:
You may have a faulty device. I'd try getting a free replacement
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] SanDiegoHB:
my problem is actually the voice quality of the *other* person, but perhaps it's a similar problem
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] fix-this!:
i used almost 1.2gb of data in the past week with at&t. we are always on wifi like 90% of the time. same setup on our phones we had with verizon and tmobile. is this normal for the note 2 and one x? google voice works over wifi right? i just cannot figure this out. at this rate id go over our 4gb data plan well within a month.

if this keeps up i may have to go back to tmobile with their unlimited data.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] mrevankyle:
Check out whats using your data. Settings/Data usage. Should be easy to identify the culprit
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] fix-this!:
right but when your on wifi, it shouldn't use data or am i incorrect? im wondering if my wife's facebook and weatherbug app are causing this when shes at work? ill have to check when she gets home tonight.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] andrawer:
That is correct... If you are connected via wifi then your data usage should not be charged.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Android The Greek:
Settings - wifi - advanced setting. See if it says wifi off when sleep
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] LittleRedDot:
Now that's data usage
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Android The Greek:
Lmao
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Bsmith0731:
Ever get throttled?

Current Devices: At&t Samsung Galaxy Note, Verizon Samsung Galaxy Nexus, Asus Google Nexus 7 Super Tablet

Current Roms: Jedi XP12 (Note 2), AOKP (Galaxy Nexus), Nexus 7 Stock
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] xfaega:
Are you sure you are connected to the wifi? I had the same problem thinking I was connect and later found out I wasn't. Also make sure your router is connected to the Internet also.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] LittleRedDot:
Strangly no, I've never been throttled.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] asbjörn:
Its not an accurate reading. I had the same thing when I first got mine. You're ok.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] LittleRedDot:
You mean my reading or the op's reading??
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] clifton421:
Is there any way to reallocate 1gb from the hard drive to act as ram so that the system registers 2gb of ram? :confused:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] t1.8matt:
isn't that what zram does?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] 063_XOBX:
Pick any one or all of these.

A. No.

B. No and if you knew it was no why make this thread?

C. No and its a terrible idea anyway since not only does the GNEx not have a hard drive , but unlike ram, flash memory would burn out from the constant read and writes.

D. Yes but only if you set it on fire.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] DonDizzurp:
what he said

from what i get, youre technically describing a swap partition which you can create but would be utterly useless on an android and would damage your flash drive permanently after constant use
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] wuodland:
Not only it isn‘t smart but will drastically reduce device longevity.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] cupfulloflol:
Download more RAM.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Woody:
^^^Lulz^^^

Thread Closed.