yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S 4 General] Dr Goodvibes:
GT-I9505 running Android 7.0

Model: i9505

Version: Android 7.0 (Alpha)

AnTuTu: 6.2.1

Score: 39008

Fig 1-1 AnTuTu 6.2.1 score: 39008

[IMG="GT-I9505 AnTuTu score 39008"]http://xdaforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=3866037&stc=1&d=1473122995[/IMG]
[Galaxy S 4 General] Feedmeeeee:
S4-LTE 9505 - OptimizedCM13-20/09 Build Thanks to JDCTeam For this rom.
[Galaxy S 4 General] Apad121:
This is a benchmark I did in June 25th. I did not modify any kernel settings. Had 6/9GB used.

On a S4 LTE 9505 on CyanogenMod 13 official 25/06/2016
[Galaxy S 4 General] leonxp770:
50k

Was anybody able to push this little sammy up to 50k with new benchmark.
[Galaxy S 4 General] gingerfish_1979:
ROM Chroma

Kernel ElementalX

Enviado desde mi Nexus 5X usando XDA Premium HD app
[Galaxy S 4 General] gingerfish_1979:
Enviado desde mi Nexus 5X usando XDA Premium HD app
[Galaxy S 4 General] Apad121:
Hi there

This is a thread for posting about the Galaxy S4 benchmarks- NOT the Nexus 5x.

Thanks
[Galaxy S 4 General] gingerfish_1979:
Excuseme.

Yo tenía en favoritos un hilo similar para lg n5x, y yo me confundí.

Enviado desde mi Nexus 5X usando XDA Premium HD app
[Galaxy S 4 General] BoneXDA:
Or clocking them down to 1.6GHz, what Samsung apparently did. The Octa comes handy as the switching between quads lets A15s cool down a bit, the only area where I see constant A15 torture is high-end 3D gameing, maybe FHD recording.
[Galaxy S 4 General] daleski75:
I am very interested in seeing how the octa-core performs both in battery life and in performance and if it succeeds this may be come the standard for future android phones.
[Galaxy S 4 General] TingTingin:
Me 2 can't wait to see this in action

S4 INFO
[Galaxy S 4 General] RTBee:
I was being sarcastic about the home computer, obviously a different architecture, it's just incredible what these phones are able to do and how far they've come so quickly.

And unless there's a different kinda math than I'm aware of, 50% increase in 1.5 would be 2.25, 33% would be 2.0, so who's closer? :cyclops:
[Galaxy S 4 General] :
Initial benchmark from GSMArena for Qualcomm 600 version:

http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s4-review-910p5.php

---------- Post added at 11:38 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:30 PM ----------
[Galaxy S 4 General] BoneXDA:
Highly satisfactory. Remember Samsung devices improve significantly to retail or first week update time, the Multi-Window featuring SW pack that came out to the Note II upon kick-off delivered fresh and all-around performance benefits.
[Galaxy S 4 General] :
Did you check the sample images?? There is a comparison with XZ. I am warming upto the device!
[Galaxy S 4 General] PLUG313:
I'm so ready to get this! whatever variant I find first I'm getting. I just can't live without a smartphone for much longer.

ideally it would be the 32GB Exynos version though.
[Galaxy S 4 General] PLUG313:
^o_o so much higher than the snapdragon version

but wasn't it supposed to be clocked at 1,6?
[Galaxy S 4 General] azdine57:
Only Exynos 5 Octa :eek:
[Galaxy S 4 General] iampun33t:
What kind of Sorcery is This..?????:eek:

---------- Post added at 08:57 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:47 AM ----------

Recently, GSMArena benchmarked the Samsung Galaxy S4, US Snapdragon 600 Version. Here are the results, with the descriptions for the new users or noobs.

Samsung Galaxy S4 Benchmarked, Beats Every Device in Almost Every Test
[Galaxy S 4 General] A-FrenZy:
lol. A powerful phone?
[Galaxy S 4 General] daleski75:
Impressive benchmarks to say the least however it's still clocked higher than the retail version when that ships so should be on par if not a little bit better than the snapdragon version.

I think the biggest difference will be the games though Adreno 320 vs PowerVR 544MP3
[Galaxy S 4 General] BoneXDA:
True, but the 26k results seem genuine at 1,6GHz as there are several similar scores where SD 600 ones fluctuate between 24k and 26k. As I said before, Sammy probably overclocked the Snapdragon not to have different performance in different versions. 1.6GHz on the Octa is music to my ears cause I'd underclock anyway for battery saving, and that clock should provide a good balance especially with the A7 cores kicking in.
[Galaxy S 4 General] touness69:
You two are obviously talking about two different versions of the S3 hence the differences in percentage count

Nuukeer is talking about the international version which is equiped with an exynos Quad core clocked at 1.4Ghz so if overclocked to 2.1Ghz it's effectively a 50% boost

And RTBee is talking about the US variant which is equiped with a Snapdragon Dual core S4 clocked at 1.5Ghz so if overclocked to 2Ghz is a 33% boost

That's why RTBee compared directly the Snapdragon 600 equiped GS4 to the actual Snapdragon equiped US variant GS3 ;)
[Galaxy S 4 General] RTBee:
Thanks for clearing that up. You are absolutely right, should have mentioned which one. :o
[Galaxy S 4 General] yahyoh:
ok Snapdragon S600 seems sucks and its overheating and throttling like hell ( Same as S4 pro ) i'm not sure if it will be better on the GS4 ( S600 version ) or worse :(

stability test on HTC One ( S600 @1728MHz )

Note2 @1.6 Ghz :D:D
[Galaxy S 4 General] PLUG313:
that's what I feared the most. ****.

like the nexus 4 D:

I would want to play games and I want it to play everything well or else the clocking at 1.9 is worthless
[Galaxy S 4 General] BoneXDA:
Is there a link for the HTC One stability test?
[Galaxy S 4 General] krasCGQ:
Hi,

XDA is an English-only forum.

Also, even if you think that's similar, as the title says, this thread is only for all benchmarks related to all Galaxy S4 variants.
[Galaxy S 4 General] audianer:
ROM with best performance vor the LTE-A! https://xdaforums.com/galaxy-s4/i9506-develop/rom-cyanogenmod-13-0-12-1-unofficial-t3264134

Installed L-Speed und select "Performance"

For example, the Stock S5 with 200MHz more got only 59555! 10% lower!
[Galaxy S 4 General] daogiahieu:
GT-I9500 with nevermore kernel and FF rom v6

That is the highest score i have ever had.
[Galaxy S 4 General] georgemei:
Latest CM from kyasu, battery profile balanced!, antutu v6.3.3 score 67331 for the S4 I9506 LTE-A edition, everything stock including the kernel.
[Galaxy S 4 General] yahyoh:
it's from Review in Arabic Forum called Adslgate :rolleyes:

http://www.adslgate.com/dsl/showthread.php?t=1518400

edit :translated link http://translate.google.com/transla...www.adslgate.com/dsl/showthread.php?t=1518400
[Galaxy S 4 General] hamdir:
rocksolid we already tested it heavily

it doesn't throttle the GPU at all not even when connected to USB

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=38537342&postcount=140

---------- Post added at 01:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:50 PM ----------

anybody willing to use fauxclock or Trickster mod in order to tell us the Adreno 320 Clocks on the s600 SGS4?
[Galaxy S 4 General] 8808889:
Good to see its heavily tested and stable already
[Galaxy S 4 General] paintball23456:
Did he Say 40K ON QUADRANT O_O

source: http://www.androidpolice.com/2013/0...samsung-after-less-than-two-years-on-the-job/
[Galaxy S 4 General] ismethajametovic:
DAMN, the S4 is a BEAST!
[Galaxy S 4 General] yahyoh:
LOL he mean the CPU scored 40K not the total score :D

the final version of the Qualcomm based GS4 should score about 13k - 14k :)
[Galaxy S 4 General] vector7:
Lenovo K900 benchmarks fly past quad-core Snapdragon
[Galaxy S 4 General] hamdir:
and the GPU? anybody cares to ask about the GPU?

you will be disappointed ;)

Clovertrail+, SGX544MP2 @533MHZ around 30fps in Egypt HD offscreen
[Galaxy S 4 General] yahyoh:
here we go some Exynos Octa benchmarks :cool::cool:
[Galaxy S 4 General] hamdir:
still no GL benchmark? is the test im looking forward the most...

the HTC One scores 25k in Antutu and 12k in quadrant, 2500 on vellamo with a 1.7ghz s600

so when you read about those A15s scoring over 36k on Tegra 4, these scores are not really impressive, its only a slight nudge over the s600 with the possible mess of the core management and thermals

in my opinion the a15 cores are definitely running lower than 1.6ghz

the GPU seems the only mystery so far
[Galaxy S 4 General] yahyoh:
T4 was connected to power supply + it was open to the Air ;)
[Galaxy S 4 General] hamdir:
yes i know but im saying i no longer see the reason why would i want the exynos over the s600
[Galaxy S 4 General] yahyoh:
hmm

1- Octa is more powerful

2- Octa use better GPU

3- Octa use HKMG

3- Snapdragon have problems with overheating and throttling

4- Octa should give better battery

5- Wolfson DAC in the OCTA version

6- the S600 will have better and more stable AOSP ( if u care ) for me i don't care

edit : i think the final version will be more optimized for both versions ;)
[Galaxy S 4 General] uvaman:
We all knew from first leaks that Exynos is power hungry, will be lower clock, they had problems and so on...

But still with those infos Exynos should be little better plus for me is that we have to wait first impression for battery that's the

only reason to transfer to. If you want CM then logical choice is Snap.

@Yah agree
[Galaxy S 4 General] hamdir:
but how do we know the octa will not throttle or overheat?

unless you are actually saying the OCTA is underclocked like anandtech said and hence we have thermal and battery consumption gains while still slightly edging the s600

if this is true, i applaud Samsung for making the right call

like you said we need more tests, especially the GPU and battery (for all we know the GPU might be UCed as well)

but the review of the OCTA we saw achieved 4 hours screen on time, that's less than the s600
[Galaxy S 4 General] :
With the screen at

maximum brightness
[Galaxy S 4 General] yahyoh:
+ he said more than half of the screen on was on temple run :D

and games are the most battery drainer :rolleyes:

even on N2 if u played a lot of games u will barely get about 6 hours screen on

LOL on iCrap 5 1 hour gaming will drain all the battery :laugh::laugh:
[Galaxy S 4 General] hamdir:
and at full brightness the device is barely bright
[Galaxy S 4 General] Euthye:
The times it takes to run down the battery don't bother me at all I sit or sleep next to a charge point of one sort or another 24/7 I've even got myself a couple of pocket sized solar phone chargers that a very handy and work very well, I got them from eBay and aldi, as long as my phone isn't broken I don't care how long it lasts.
[Galaxy S 4 General] PLUG313:
well it matters for some people, for example I need it for a whole school day. sometimes I can charge it because some teachers aren't so strict and sometimes on the computers, but other times I just don't have a chance to. and I use it a lot at school, I'm bored all the time lol
[Galaxy S 4 General] Euthye:
I hadn't even considered school kids and their lack of control of their environment, fair point but my sons S3 always gets him through the day, if it didn't I'd either get a spare battery or do like I already said and get a pocket solar charger, it's useful and green win win:cool:
[Galaxy S 4 General] SlimJ87D:
Supposedly OCTA benchmarks:

http://gagadget.com/cellphones/2013-03-27-obzor-samsung-galaxy-s4/

So how do these compare to the S-600?
[Galaxy S 4 General] Euthye:
Further down the link above they give 4 hours 20 min at full brightness video screen on, so the exynos model battery is sound.
[Galaxy S 4 General] boodies:
http://www.androidauthority.com/galaxy-s4-benchmark-exynos-5-octa-version-gt-i9500-available-179752/
[Galaxy S 4 General] SlimJ87D:
So does it seem that the overclocked S-600 and the Octa peform close to the same?
[Galaxy S 4 General] :
Very detailed

overview

by Eldar Murtazin:

http://www.mobile-review.com/review/samsung-galaxy-s4.shtml

Also some benchmarks for Octa version.

EDIT: I see that the link is already mentioned here
[Galaxy S 4 General] Thin_Bezel:
Yay.. Finally Exynos octa core version of the s4 has been benchmarked....impressive results

http://naldotech.blogspot.com/2013/03/exynos-octa-core-version-of-galaxy-s4.html
[Galaxy S 4 General] Baldilocks:
I'm would be more than happy with the Snapdragon version. :) The 10% increase in performance in benchmark scores of the Exynos can and will probably be negated by rooting and overclocking and other tweaks.
[Galaxy S 4 General] MohJee:
It's not the increased performance that we care about from Exynos model. It's the (supposedly) increased battery life.
[Galaxy S 4 General] Baldilocks:
I'm not worried about it. The Snapdragon variant has pretty good battery life even in it's pre-production state.
[Galaxy S 4 General] bala_gamer:
ding ding!final score!!!

EXYNOS -2

SNAPDRAGON -2

:cool::cool::cool::cool:

guys there are already people fuming and raging over octa vs snapdragon, lets not make it bigger :)Its upto the end users to choose whatever they want.

Technically exynos is better than snapdragon in many areas so far.. it cant be denied. again its upto the users to decide whether they want this superiority or not.
[Galaxy S 4 General] RCJ89:
How many people actually follow all these benchmark tests, reasons I ask is because my HTC one has higher quadrant and antutu scores that GSM arena are showing and I have also seen on youtube vids HTC Ones scoring high into the 12, 000s on quadrant where GSM arena shows it in the 11, 000s and also I have seen a youtube vid where a HTC One got 25, 064 in antutu but again gsm arena shows in 22, 000s.

This leads me to believe both versions of the S4 can score higher than what is advertised on GSM arena and there isn't alot anyway between both versions of the s4. I will be getting the exynos version though as I dont care about 4g.
[Galaxy S 4 General] TingTingin:
U mean exactly what u can do with the Octa core version?

S4 INFO
[Galaxy S 4 General] Euthye:
I'll be honest I want the exynos performance increase, battery life improvement, meh, I've never had a phone die on me, loads of electricity points around, I just hope customers get the choice and we don't get locked down markets with excessive import costs and taxes.
[Galaxy S 4 General] hamdir:
Exnoys OCTA GPU, like predicted matching s600

http://habrahabr.ru/company/nomobile/blog/174559/

---------- Post added at 01:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:24 PM ----------

with the exception of Antutu its almost equa 27k vs 24k, s600 is not far behind

GPU results are a match, vellamo scores better on s600 (its Aualcomm bench)

Quadrants are very close as well
[Galaxy S 4 General] DocRambone:
Looks way better than this:

http://www.glbenchmark.com/phonedetails.jsp?benchmark=glpro25&D=HTC+One&testgroup=overall
[Galaxy S 4 General] hamdir:
http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=39665574&postcount=85
[Galaxy S 4 General] DocRambone:
The numbers still looks better ;)

Htc one: LBenchmark 2.5 Egypt HD C24Z16 - Offscreen (1080p) :3850 Frames (34.1 Fps)

S4 Octa: LBenchmark 2.5 Egypt HD C24Z16 - Offscreen (1080p) :4450 Frames (40 Fps)

And look at the boost in fillrate on S4. :)

Htc one: Fill rate - Onscreen : 958 MTexels/s

S4 Octa: Fill rate - Onscreen : 1869 Mtexels/s
[Galaxy S 4 General] hamdir:
we talk again in one/two months :)
[Galaxy S 4 General] BoneXDA:
Samsung won't sit back and relax in those weeks either. ;)

It's cool that competition forces manufactures to get optimization right. :good:
[Galaxy S 4 General] hamdir:
compare them on the same s600 devices and you will see wildly varying results

as long as the SGS4 s600 can achieve 41fps, so can the HTC One
[Galaxy S 4 General] yahyoh:
i don't think so , i think Sammy OC'd Adreno 320 in GS4 more than HTC One ( or maybe driver thingy ) IDK :rolleyes:
[Galaxy S 4 General] TingTingin:
Exynos s4 destroys everything and lives up to expectations

Plus still time for tweaks :eek:

Looks like Sammy isn't underclocking the Exynos 5 like originally reported full 1.8 ghz

Can't wait to get my hands on this

S4 INFO
[Galaxy S 4 General] bala_gamer:
ONSCREEN : 1869 MTEXELS/S

OFFSCREEN : 1986 MTEXELS/S
[Galaxy S 4 General] boodies:
amazing
[Galaxy S 4 General] bedi.gursimran:
How bright's the galaxy s2 gt-i9100. I have no problems with it under sun.
[Galaxy S 4 General] yahyoh:
about 362 nits according to gsmarena :)
[Galaxy S 4 General] azdine57:
Adreno 330 Next LG flagship?

Incredible :eek:
[Galaxy S 4 General] Toss3:
The s800 is definitely going to be amazing, but unless it is in a Samsung Galaxy S-series phone, the other parts will suck, which renders its speed moot. The Exynos 5410 should have no problem keeping up. ;)
[Galaxy S 4 General] Ace42:
While that is a nice boost of 33% from the iPad's SGX it is probably not worth upgrading to the S800 if you own a relatively powerful device, like the S3 for instance.

Android games are not properly optimized for all these different chips, which makes all this GPU power quite useless. The Adreno 320 can look worse than Tegra 3 in certain games due to developers giving Nvidia special effects, this prevents Adreno from utilizing its potential. However Real Racing 3 and the new games for Tegra like Real boxing, that mech games, and Dead Trigger 2 will be serious contenders.

http://www.notebookcheck.net/Nvidia-publishes-more-Tegra-4-benchmarks.88802.0.html
[Galaxy S 4 General] azdine57:
LG OptimusG2 :cool:

http://pocketnow.com/2013/03/29/lg-optimus-g2-benchmark?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
[Galaxy S 4 General] yahyoh:
it must be joke :laugh:

LOL Optimus G still not even available for 70% of the world
[Galaxy S 4 General] Toss3:
LG is a joke. They will just release a new "high-end" phone and forget about the ones they already sold. They will never learn.
[Galaxy S 4 General] marcowang:
http://www.appledaily.com.tw/appledaily/article/supplement/20130329/34917600/

This is a popular newspaper test S4 after Samsung annouce S4 in Taiwan.

The benchmark results of Antutu (Octa version) is very good.

And it mentioned the temperature is 31 degree C after 1.5hr used.
[Galaxy S 4 General] pack21:
Indeed, LG is big joke!!!

We saw that with N4........I have 3 N4 full screen protectors but I couldn't buy any N4 in time, now is later..... loool

LG can only hold in storefronts sh*t, If anyone thinks will be able to buy this phone in time well can expect seated...ahahah
[Galaxy S 4 General] yahyoh:
WOW :cool:

Octa ♥♥ :cool:
[Galaxy S 4 General] yahyoh:
Octa :good:
[Galaxy S 4 General] jianlinooi:
quadrant score from which review? would like to see octa geekbench score though..
[Galaxy S 4 General] yahyoh:
http://youtu.be/3jMIo3Tykmg?t=2m56s
[Galaxy S 4 General] jianlinooi:
octa is more future proof for me....devs in xda would able to achieve all 8 core running at one time if needed...haha
[Galaxy S 4 General] daleski75:
The term "future proof" is highly dependant on how long people keep their phone for.. I tend to keep my phones a max of 1 year so no phone is future proof for me and all 8 cores running at the same time would more than likely hammer the battery so it makes it next to useless.

Don't forget the Big.Little design is to prolong battery life not to have it blasting away running 8 cores like a little mini furnace and what exactly would you get out of running all 8 cores at once anyway??.
[Galaxy S 4 General] ama3654:
Yeah i like that, imagine all that 8 core running same time, no phone can beat that,i'm always close to AC outlet just in case it sucks juice, but what i'm thinking is run all the 8 cores at 1 GHz. Octa core is proper A15 cores so i agree 100% future proof.
[Galaxy S 4 General] Baldilocks:
Why does anyone here care about 'future proof'? The majority of us will be in here next year talking about buying the Galaxy S5 -- just as we were last year with the GS3.
[Galaxy S 4 General] androidkking:
touche to that..!!
[Galaxy S 4 General] Administr4tor:
what about overclocking benchmark tests ?
[Galaxy S 4 General] jianlinooi:
for now d octa score 27-28k based on review...i believe in 2ghz...easily hit 30k antutu score...still waiting to see the geekbench score though....hopefully at least 3.5k since 1.9ghz s600 3.2k
[Galaxy S 4 General] :
Need to check the 3dmark benchmarks for s600 and Exynos version:

3DMark for Android: Performance Preview
[Galaxy S 4 General] yahyoh:
LOL Mali 400 ****ed up , its ancient GPU :silly::(
[Galaxy S 4 General] touness69:
Here you go for the 3Dmark score of the OCTA version ==> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ymXQHSxOh4&t=6m14s

:o
[Galaxy S 4 General] yahyoh:
so Powervr 544 is nothing special compared to Adreno 320 :(

i wish Samsung used series 6 instead of the old 5 or Mali t678 :rolleyes:

Samsung always love the use old GPU's in their SoC :eek::eek:
[Galaxy S 4 General] Razzzzer:
exactly... not sure what "future proof" even means in a phone these days. Unless something drastically changes in the near future phone users typically go thru a phone in about 1 or 2 years. IMHO most of the users only wait 2 years so they can get a subed phone (thats been my case). I am not sure future proofing is even a consideration..
[Galaxy S 4 General] touness69:
Here you go for the Geekbench score of the OCTA version ==> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IuzTsQjmaX8&t=7m02s

Maybe with enhancements in the software part the score will improve ? Don't forget two things : those are prototype units that are compared to final retail units of other brand (HTC ONE, XPERIA Z) and be sure that software optimization can get you a looong way ;)
[Galaxy S 4 General] yahyoh:
WOW thats good score :D :cool:

HMM lets hope the final version will come with better and more Optimized GPU driver :rolleyes:

BTW i found this from XZ

this seems thorttled :p
[Galaxy S 4 General] touness69:
Or maybe other apps are running in the background ? Who knows :angel:
[Galaxy S 4 General] DiP7:
3DMark: Samsung Galaxy S4 (Exynos) vs HTC One
[Galaxy S 4 General] :
Thanks for the link.

Few interesting points from the comparison, taken from AT explanation:

Graphics test 1 stresses the vertex capability. PowerVR marginally ahead of Adreno 320.

Graphics test 2 tests ability to process lot of pixels. Adreno ahead of PowerVR by 20%.

The Graphics score is a combination of Graphics test 1 & 2.

The Physics test is primarily CPU intensive. Tests how the CPU can cope with minimal GPU help.

The Exynos is clear winner here. Shows the strength of A15. The difference is 50%. This is quite large.

The Physics score results can be explained from the Physics test results. Again Exynos ahead by 50%.

The Ice Storm score is sort of 'final' score combined of all tests. I would rather prefer checking individual scores.

Demo isn't part of the test suite. It's optional. Adreno ahead of PowerVR here marginally.
[Galaxy S 4 General] DiP7:
SGS4 (Exynos) slower SGS4 (Qualcomm) in 3D (Game) http://www.max-up.ru/news-apple/3dmark-sgs4-exynos-vs-htc-one.html
[Galaxy S 4 General] skibadee:
Unless the Exynos is going to be better optimised in the final release I'm doubting whether I'll wait for it now.

Maybe I'll get the snapdragon version after all :)
[Galaxy S 4 General] yahyoh:
dude don't put a lot of hope :silly:

powervr 544 is 2-3 years old GPU :(

just wait the new iPhone with powervr series 6 it will wipe the floor with GS4 in terms of GPU :(:(
[Galaxy S 4 General] skibadee:
Buy an iPhone? Lol that's funny. :D
[Galaxy S 4 General] darrendm:
It's scary seeing the S4 lag so bad vs. the iPhone 5. Shameful really.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqdenmHG2tc
[Galaxy S 4 General] Toss3:
Lack of optimisation, as both the s600 and Exynos 5410 should handily beat the iPhone 5.
[Galaxy S 4 General] TingTingin:
Pre-version and also lack of optimization Google doesn't help and devs don't go the extra mile to make sure games function properly

S4 INFO
[Galaxy S 4 General] touness69:
yeah and btw that's not exactly the same pixel count that both of these devices have to push.

iPhone 5 : 640 x 1136 which results to a total of 727 040 pixels

GS4 : 1080 x 1920 which results to a total of 2 073 600 pixels

That's nearly 3 times as much pixels for the GS4 !! 2,85 times to be exact

So when you take that into account and the fact that the software of the GS4 and therefore the drivers of the GPU are still in beta stage, that makes a little more sense..