yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S III General] TaoNinja:
Galaxy Note 2 Keyboard

Hey Guys,

Not sure if this is a stupid question,

But if it possible to get the Galaxy Note 2 Keyboard working for SlimBean or CM10 roms?

If so does anyone have a flash-able zip of at least tell me what I need to do?

Thanks :D

---------- Post added at 03:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:32 PM ----------

Just install Yanks CM10.1 Kernel,

You wont need to mess with Mali patches and also i believe the supposed "SDS" fix is to do with the Kernel,

Not the ROM,

So all of the latest Kernel should now have that implemented anyway..
[Galaxy S III General] slaphead20:
There's this over in themes and apps, didn't have time to check if it's ported to Aosp, but I doubt it!

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2120054

[MOD][03 Mar][4.1.2] Note ll Keyboard with Auto Correct, Handwriting and System Fonts
[Galaxy S III General] exitjen:
Yeah but the stock kernel from SlimBean has the fix also or not?
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
Who's our aokp maintainer?
[Galaxy S III General] DSA:
i think its now graffixnyc but im not sure - i know hes just been added to the team as a maintainer
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
And some other guy called Tom, I read.
[Galaxy S III General] puffo81:
R: Aosp roms discussion thread. [Minor FAQ inside]

Regarding AOSP, in my opinion the best is Carbon, nice look, goid feeling and blazing fast! Never saw anything faster on an S3
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
Hmm. Tough choice. Today after work I'll either flash carbon, AOKP or cm. Gonna be hard making my mind up on that!
[Galaxy S III General] mark26:
slim is still the best for me :)
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
I expect nothing else of you. ;)
[Galaxy S III General] mark26:
Nice thread by the way mate:thumbup:
[Galaxy S III General] ekie84:
i am using slim bean right now...my question is,why on aokp,cm.10.1 the android os uses battery?(2nd to screen)thanks

is there any walk through?
[Galaxy S III General] Obi-man:
Like a lot of people here i love how smooth CarbonRom is, the one major problem i have with it is the LED control which is not working. I know it's a known but, i've seen it on the bug tracker over at Carbons community page.

I've tried lightmanager, but that doesn't work either. Anybody have another suggestion i could try so i can control the colors of the led per app :confused:
[Galaxy S III General] Glebun:
light flow
[Galaxy S III General] Obi-man:
That one works! Tnx for the tip. :good::good:
[Galaxy S III General] Galactus:
I take it the camera in AOSP/AOKP roms is still referred to as inferior to stock sammy roms? Last time I was on it, I really missed the stereo audio and touch to focus feature whilst recording videos
[Galaxy S III General] Stovemeister:
Another +1 to Carbon.

But I also like the way the Yank555.lu kernel tweaked the audio. And after updating Carbon to 1.5 beta, i tried to come onto XDA and download the latest Yank kernel.

He must have been a bad boy, as ALL of his threads are removed and I can't find the kernels anywhere anymore.

Two Questions:

1) How bad was he? (I am just after the goss, honestly)

2) Anyone have any links to offsite downloads of the yank555.lu kernels?

Thanks
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
He wasn't bad, he manually decided to take his work off xda after a fight with a recognized developer.
[Galaxy S III General] Stovemeister:
Bummer- Initially I was a bit underwhelmed by Yank kernels, but the latest ones have been great. And I love the way it makes music sound.

I found a download link to a kernel that works with this version of Carbon (v1.5 for CM10.1) so all is well with the world.

Still. it's a shame that a good developer has gone AWOL from XDA.

"Why can't we all just get along?" - Rodney King
[Galaxy S III General] sachilleas:
I have three questions! :rolleyes:

1) What kernels are compatible with 4.2.2 Roms now that Yank kernel is no longer in the cards?

2) Do stock kernels from carbon, supernexus, etc.. have the sds fix?

3)What's is the new mali drivers that you all say in this thread?

I believe that all these questions can go in the faq!
[Galaxy S III General] c_tho:
props to theshawty for this thread, i've always had difficulty finding places to discuss general AOSP rom issues.

might be worth popping the mali driver stuff in the OP, seems topical.
[Galaxy S III General] rickoslyder:
Carbon 1.5beta, temasek kernel OC'ed to 1.6GHz and UVed using tema's values, screen calibrated + Boeffla Sound, latest CrossBreeder and V6 Supercharger = supernatural speed. It's oily smooth, the CrossBreeder's DNS feature makes almost every app requiring internet load faster and to top it all off, good battery too - slept with 94% and woke up 9 hours later with 85%.
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
Done, thanks. Added to the faq!
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
I'm sorry, guys. I had completely forgotten to add a thanks list where I credit the ones giving me handy tips (to put in the faq, etc.)
[Galaxy S III General] slaphead20:
Thankyou for the mention good Sire Theshawty, May your truck driving days be blessed :D
[Galaxy S III General] mark26:
might be worth putting a link for better battery stats and a quick message to use it for those complaining about battery life on their chosen rom. seems to be an ongoing question on most forums.
[Galaxy S III General] Galactus:
Are people able to seek songs that are in M4A format? Got a ton of albums that I can rewind/fast forward.
[Galaxy S III General] saranyan:
On Aosp rom's I lose 2%/hr overnight battery with everything(sync,wifi,data) switched off. I have google Now turned on..

When I checked BBS, IT says all sorts of location based maps processes drain the battery..

I know Aosp rom's have considerably worse battery life compared to TW, But is this normal? Or is due to google now?
[Galaxy S III General] ekie84:
I do think is normal for aokp/cm10.1 roms
[Galaxy S III General] Galactus:
Google Now can be a real battery drainer, constantly polling for your location even when your asleep, pulling in updates etc, no surprise it drains battery life pretty quickly. AOSP roms do suffer from worse battery life but not by too much. I can normally run my phone to about 5% over 24 hours, with screen on time around 4 hours 30 mins on Samsung roms. On AOSP I can do about 3-4 hours screen on time over 24 hours. Last time I used Google Now, I didn't make it past the 3 hour mark.
[Galaxy S III General] Glebun:
Why no word about Paranoid here? It's awesome
[Galaxy S III General] mikep99:
Is that a question in the general thread?? :D
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
Paranoid? Who's paranoid? I'm not paranoid :eek:

;)
[Galaxy S III General] Glebun:
yes it is, and this looks like a best ROM thread :p
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
Well it isn't. It's a place where we're discussing aosp roms.
[Galaxy S III General] Glebun:
I know, I was joking. And honestly, it might just turn into one, be careful
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
I certainly hope it doesn't. People need to learn that there is no such thing as a best rom.
[Galaxy S III General] Glebun:
But I think it's stupid to not let users advice ROMs based on objective things like stability/features/battery. About battery - I know everyone's usage is different, yet you can see battery life comparisons in every smartphone review, and it's pretty helpful.
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
I don't remember forbidding users to advice about roms.
[Galaxy S III General] drakester09:
It *should* be okay to educate as long as it is not a direct comparison.

Generally, A vs. B threads are not allowed in xda. And you usually get naysayers when comparing battery life.

My only real complaint with AOSP it's precisely the battery life. :(
[Galaxy S III General] Galactus:
Quick question, what is the easiest way to replace the green emoji in AOSP roms. I plan to change some of the images in the mms.apk and was wondering if I could simply replace the image files as long as they are named the same as the original file. Something tells me it will be a bit more complicated since the rom (Carbon) has odexed system files.
[Galaxy S III General] Glebun:
wasn't talking about you, was talking about the rules
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
Bump.

How come there's been a release of LiquidSmooth RC2 for the i9300 (just two days ago)? I thought Carbon was the new LS?
[Galaxy S III General] mikep99:
I think the team split into 2 - now there is both LiquidSmooth & Carbon.

Not sure why there isn't a thread on here for the latest LiquidSmooth though :confused:
[Galaxy S III General] jhonny20041433:
I have searched this thread and can't find an answer, what is up with the Emulated folder?

Also I did a proper factory reset from within the System Settings Menu, that should have deleted everything. Yet I only get 5.43GB free space to use. Last I remember I should have got the full 11GB? I have also checked my data/media folder and that folder is empty.

Again I am sorry if this has been answered, I tried my best searching for the solutions.

Any help will be much appreciated.

Thanks.
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
Weird. Have you tried formatting internal storage in the recovery?
[Galaxy S III General] jhonny20041433:
Nope.

I'm using CWM 6.0.2.8, and can't seem to find the option?
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
Go to mounts and storage and then format /data/media (sdcard)
[Galaxy S III General] jhonny20041433:
Okay this is what I have to do I gather, I'll give it a go now.

{

If you are rooted and have CWM Recovery:

1. Boot into recovery

2. Mounts & storage

3. Format sdcard

}
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
Exactly. (Why the curvy brackets?)
[Galaxy S III General] jhonny20041433:
Didn't even realise I did those brackets.

That worked like a charm :good:

Now I just have to decide if I should stick with Carbon 1.5 or Flash the new PA3.10 Rom that rolled out yesterday!
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
Of course it worked. ;) In the settings menu, it's only set to wipe what it recognizes, i.e. data/media/0 which the new mount point is. The old one remains (data/media) which CWM wipes flawlessly. ^^

Regarding the brackets thing, I think you've written one java line too many today. :p

I also wanna go to asop, like really badly, but I can't. :(
[Galaxy S III General] jhonny20041433:
Why not?

Are there still some flaws with the PA Rom when compared with the latest Carbon?
[Galaxy S III General] mikep99:
Has anyone successfully got call recording working on CM10.1 based roms?

If so, could you shed any light on the kernel / app you use?

I've had a search but haven't found anything definitive...

Thanks in advance.
[Galaxy S III General] g0t-cheeri0s:
Back on topic: Anyone here tried both latest Carbon AND Paranoid? PA 3.0 battery was horrendous for me but I put that down to the AOSP ship jump. Some fine ironing to do if you get my drift. Just wondering what your thoughts are if you've tried it

Sent from my GT-I9300
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
I haven't tried either (Well, I've run Carbon 1.5, just not the latest) but I know from personal experience that you get a better battery life after nearly a week. You have to let the rom settle down (which I know you know ^^).
[Galaxy S III General] Swiftks:
Thread Cleaned.

Stop the childish bickering, and stay on topic or infractions will be handed out.
[Galaxy S III General] Glebun:
guys, I'm looking for a CM/PA/AOKP ROM, but since there is a couple for them, can you give me any advice on which one is the smoothest and which one has the best battery life? both of those are objective if you compare the same usage :P
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
The level of smoothness is shared equally through all aosp roms, i.e. absolutely stunning smoothness. The battery life drainage, however, is not. That's affected by so many factors it'll forever be impossible to say.

The best mashup according to me, though would be PACman. Maybe RootBox, but I'm gonna say PACman since it was the very first mashup and is bound to have grown a lot better by now.
[Galaxy S III General] Glebun:
thanks, that's what I happen to be using right now
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
Feel free to post how it is. Also feel free to post screens of your setup. :)
[Galaxy S III General] mark26:
slim all the way for me buddy :)
[Galaxy S III General] Glebun:
that's not useful at all. why?
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
Well, to be fair, you didn't specify you were looking for a CM/PA/AOKP mashup. By simply asking for a CM/PA/AOKP rom makes one believe you want one or the other, which probably is why mark wrote what he did.
[Galaxy S III General] mark26:
appologies mate. misread/misunderstood your post.
[Galaxy S III General] Glebun:
true, but I was actually referencing his lack of explanation
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
"Slim all the way" kinda gives away enough, don't you think? ^^
[Galaxy S III General] Glebun:
uhm, no, it doesn't give any reasons to support the statement
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
You asked for our opinions, and an opinion as given. Mark said Slim, and that's his opinion.
[Galaxy S III General] Glebun:
oh come on, that's a pointless argument we're having. just names without reasons are not helpful, that's all
[Galaxy S III General] mloc33:
I made a stupid mistake and realized it after I did, but I flashed Yanks v3.3a, now I`ve the black screen, is my only option to Odin flash or where do I go from here, cheers.
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
Easy-peasy. Simply flash one of yank's newer kernels (the newest you can find). I can guarantee it has the new mali driver included (which is why you're getting a black screen, yank 3.3 does not have the mali driver)

I can't, nor I won't toss you any links to yank's kernels. He doesn't want his work on XDA anymore.
[Galaxy S III General] slaphead20:
Chortle chortle :p

Even experienced people mess up :D
[Galaxy S III General] mloc33:
I can`t seem to get into recovery to flash it?

I was trying the 3-button combo.
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
That's weird, the 3-button combo has always worked for me. Are you sure you're trying long enough and that you're pressing volume up and not down? What if you pull the battery and then try the 3-button combo?
[Galaxy S III General] slaphead20:
Try flashing a recovery with Odin, it might just of messed it up, philz has Odin version I believe
[Galaxy S III General] mloc33:
Tried it man, no joy, it shows the Samsung galaxy screen, but that`s about it...

Alright man I`ll try it, cheers.
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
TWRP has an odin version as well (direct link): http://techerrata.com/file/twrp2/i9300/openrecovery-twrp-2.4.4.0-i9300.tar

CWM Touch is in a tar file by mskip: http://xdaforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=1722994&stc=1&d=1360663507
[Galaxy S III General] slaphead20:
Failing that I reckon a clean flash with Odin would be wise
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
That doesn't bode well.
[Galaxy S III General] mloc33:
Sweet jesus that was to bloody close.

Odin Philz no joy, then tried the 3 button combo again, took finger off of home button, got into recovery,(again lack of flashing, or outta whack, I`ll blame me kids).

Could`nt mount anything in recovery, so luckily I had Yanks kernel cleaner on me phone, used that, then started from scratch again, wiping everything, now back on Slim, thank funk, now I gotta go through all that shte again, lol.

Cheers lads for your help, sound as a pound, when ya`s have that BBQ I`ll buy ya`s a beer and BBQ ya some horse burgers, lol.
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
Bump :p
[Galaxy S III General] jinosong:
Hey guys, quick question... I'm on the Temasek rom and kernel. Can I flash the Boeffla sound engine? Anyone know where I can find it?
[Galaxy S III General] Darius_AWS:
How can I disable led while charging on aokp ?

Envoyé depuis mon GT-I9300 avec Tapatalk
[Galaxy S III General] Glebun:
this is a thread for discussing different ROMs, not for troubleshooting. Ask in the ROM thread or in the help section
[Galaxy S III General] jinosong:
I see we're still mini-modding, are we? I'm not troubleshooting, I'm asking a question in reference to this.

Did I say something was broken?
[Galaxy S III General] lynxboy:
It's built in to his older kernel. I think the 6th April Kernel was the last to use it. You lose the ABB stuff though. Apparently the new sound engine is just as good. I personally miss the Boeffla sound though.

Regards.
[Galaxy S III General] Racinghart91:
Sentinel Rom is still the best for performance and battery life.

my battery just wont go empty.. after a full day of whatsapp, facebook internet and playing games its still not dead
[Galaxy S III General] rickoslyder:
A) When did I say anything was broken?

B) Why would you bother quoting a post from 7TH MARCH?
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
I think he meant to quote Glebun.
[Galaxy S III General] jinosong:
That comment was not directed to you. Sorry for the confusion. :o
[Galaxy S III General] lynxboy:
I keep hearing this about Sentinel ROM. How does the battery life compare to temasek?

I'm currently averaging 4-5 hours screen time depending on usage. Currently 14 hours off charge with 35% remaining and used just over 3 hours screen. Is it really much better than this?

Regards.
[Galaxy S III General] danarama:
Shameless ;)
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
Shameless is my middle name. ^^
[Galaxy S III General] danarama:
Unorthodox ha ha....
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
Good thing I'm an atheist. ;)
[Galaxy S III General] exitjen:
+1 for sentinel :) running it on my i9300 science it came out. Best battery and performance ever! Stock kernel btw.
[Galaxy S III General] shrome99:
I'll try Sentinel too, it seems to be immensely popular, the thread has 126 pages in less than a month :eek:

BTW, what's everyone's favorite AOSP ROM, and why? My personal favourite is AOKP, but right now I'm using CM10 for the button remapping :p
[Galaxy S III General] danarama:
I love Paranoid Android's dpi and layout settings, so I can't not have that. If Sentinel was based off PA or PAC man, I'd love it.

I've downloaded PAC today because it has the PA stuff I like, but some AOKP settings too.
[Galaxy S III General] shrome99:
I don't like "combination" ROMs like PAC or rootbox, they seem to just mash stuff from the 3 major ROMs (CM, AOKP & PA) and tend to bring up random bugs and conflicting tweaks. The only good one is SlimBean. I used PA just once, and while I understood the appeal of DPI change (most stuff looks amazing at ~170 DPI) regular layout felt better
[Galaxy S III General] danarama:
I've never tried a combo. Glebun recommended PAC to me recently so was going to try it. I actually have no idea what AOKP settings it's going to bring. I'm just trying it to find out.

PA is based on CM anyway, so I think the C of PAC is overreaching a bit ;)

But you're right about bugs. Back in the GB days I ported the entire CM lockscreen system to my AOSP base. Whilst it was largely successful, there were some bugs introduced that I couldn't fix.

It's not so much the DPI of PA that draws me as it is the layouts you can change per app. I don't even change that many.

Here are my favourites:
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
You're wrong. They used to base their builds on CM, but then they ditched CM and created their own aosp rom. AOSPA.
[Galaxy S III General] danarama:
They're just using the CM Kernel then?

So what exclusive-to-CM function has PAC put in?
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
Dunno if they're even using the CM kernel. I think they have their own PA kernel, but with CM device trees, patches and fixes (which basically makes it a CM kernel, lol)

If I understand it right, PAC has everything from PA, everything from AOKP and lastly everything from CM.
[Galaxy S III General] danarama:
Yeah it packs with the cm kernel.

May try pac still cause I love the cm pattern lock
[Galaxy S III General] shrome99:
I suppose by default, all AOSP ROMs use the cm kernel on the S3,but yeah other than that PA is based off AOSP rather than cm. While this makes the ROM much better on Nexus devices, it makes support for all others difficult, that is why we still don't have 3.5 (read something similar somewhere)

Sent from my GT-I9300
[Galaxy S III General] danarama:
We don't have 3.5 due to the dev doing exams and some RIL bug
[Galaxy S III General] sachilleas:
I suppose Pacman has too many bugs from my experience and if you take into account the comments in the relevant thread.

Liquidsmooth's devs do not post or maybe even read their thread. There is a no sound video camera bug which isn't solved in the new release despite the fact that everyone talks about it. Otherwise it's a very good Rom.

Carbon Rom is a great Rom. It's very stable with a lot of features but devs do not take part in any conversation taking place in their thread. They haven't even updated the first page. I recommend it.

SlimBean is the best AOSP Rom imo. Many features, very clean, good battery life. Only downside is the "Can't connect to camera" everytime I open the cam app. It is solved be flashing a different kernel (siyah). This problem doesn't affect all users. Totally recommended.

CM 10.1 is an all time classic Rom but with not so many features. Very stable but not so good battery life for me.

Jellybam has tons and tons of features but it's the most unstable of all Aosp/Aokp Roms. Full of bugs.

AOKP is definitely not my taste. Too many features but still there are things missing. E.g. : If I remember correctly you can't turn off the led when you are charging the phone.

Paranoid android is for dpi freaks with excellent mods in this direction. Not my taste either.

Just a brief text about each AOSP/AOKP Rom that I have used. If I had to recommend someone a Rom I would definitely point him towards SlimBean.
[Galaxy S III General] danarama:
I think it a bit unfair to say Paranoid Android is for "dpi freaks". Yes you can change the dpi, but its really all about the tablet layout of apps. dpi is secondary to that, so really its for people wanting the possibility of using the tablet layout of applications that the devs have coded, but arent available in non-tablet modes.

I'm on PAC man now, still setting up but its going well. I don't like when I have to go into AOKP settings and CM settings. I'd like all that merged together personally. Maybe thats something I'll do on my own, one day when i can get a better internet connection in the countryside.

I've not had chance to find any bugs yet. I'm sure there are some.

There is one button alone in settings that makes it better than Paranoid Android for me. The "Make it dark" button. It takes that dark grey background from the right-hand pane in tablet mode of settings.
[Galaxy S III General] sachilleas:
I didn't mean to offend anyone with "dpi freaks"! I meant it in a humorous way. Of course Paranoid Android it's more than that.

Now, about the "make it dark" button, there is one in carbon, slimbeam, liquidsmooth etc.. also.
[Galaxy S III General] danarama:
I know you didn't ;)
[Galaxy S III General] Madness.:
SentinelROM with Temasek Kernel Linaro is great!

GT-I9300 cihazımdan Tapatalk 2 ile gönderildi
[Galaxy S III General] shrome99:
I'm not certain, but I'm pretty sure that the kernel is a huge part of what makes Sentinel (or any linaro rom) smoother, so it wouldn't be the best idea to flash it.

Sent from my GT-I9300
[Galaxy S III General] danarama:
Yeah I would expect so. Flashing over the kernel almost makes having the ROM pointless, if "battery life" and "performance" are your reasons for flashing it.
[Galaxy S III General] sachilleas:
How can sentinel be so better in battery life terms from stock CM or even Temasek? It seems very strange to me and I wonder if there is a downside somewhere..
[Galaxy S III General] shrome99:
It's possible, the open sourced nature of Android makes room for an infinite no. of improvements, the large no. of users in the thread makes it pretty clear. Still, I understand your skepticism, anyone who claims "Smoother Performance" and "Better Battery Life" in an OEM ROM (like TW/Sense etc.) is just filling his thread with BS for publicity ;)
[Galaxy S III General] beeeto:
My only complain with AOSP roms is camera quality. Is there any other camera app/mod that actually match with Samsung TouchWiz?