yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[HTC Droid DNA] Melodycd:
Hi! So when I got S-off, I am sure we can check phone hardware info somehow. Screen manufacturer, etc. Can someone explain how to check it?

Droid DNA
[HTC Droid DNA] .torrented:
I think if you have the ENG hboot it I'll tell you under one of the options not 100% sure though

just keep in mind the ENG hboot is an accident waiting to happen if you decide to flash it
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] JumplnTheFire:
I saw the Galaxy S3 has a 6300mAh battery available and that people are getting like 10-15 on screen hours with it and I can't help but be jealous.

I understand that the Nexus 4 lacks the capability for extended batteries due to essential parts on the back of the case, correct?

But it's also true that one can replace the battery so long as it's in the same form factor/style as the stock battery, correct?

So, is there any way people can squeeze more mAh into a battery of the right type/size and if so do they exist yet?
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] abe in space:
The back of the nexus 4 requires a torx size 5 screwdriver to remove, as well as some kind of spudger, but that isn't really a deal breaker for the sort of people who would want the product you're asking for.

The problem is, you'd need some real engineering ability, and you'd need to be pretty exacting in your design for the replacement battery back to fit properly.you'd also be giving up wireless charging because that functionality is built into the existing back. As far as more capacity in the same space, no. Not any time soon.
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] theexgov:
I saw a post about Zerolemon making a battery case for the N4 in three sizes (varying capacity and presumably bulk). I think it's supposed to be released next month. Might be a workable alternative to a replacement battery.
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tommmtom:
Do what I've done... http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=40420956

Still got the wireless charging and NFC :) battery life is amazing!
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rawe_etc:
hello .. need help

could some want help me for resolve the problem

i try to update aapt.exe .. jar and else i have the same result .. thank you big appreciated

C:\ICS Apktool>apktool d framework-res.apk

I: Loading resource table...

I: Loaded.

I: Decoding AndroidManifest.xml with resources...

I: Regular manifest package...

I: Decoding file-resources...

I: Decoding values */* XMLs...

I: Done.

I: Copying assets and libs...

C:\ICS Apktool>apktool b framework-res

W: Could not find sources

I: Checking whether resources has changed...

I: Building resources...

Exception in thread "main" brut.androlib.AndrolibException: brut.androlib.Androl

ibException: brut.common.BrutException: could not exec command: [aapt, p, --min-

sdk-version, 15, --target-sdk-version, 15, -F, C:\Users\GumZ\AppData\Local\Temp\

APKTOOL9205491744427801309.tmp, -x, -0, arsc, -S, C:\ICS Apktool\framework-res\r

es, -M, C:\ICS Apktool\framework-res\AndroidManifest.xml]

at brut.androlib.Androlib.buildResourcesFull(Androlib.java:358)

at brut.androlib.Androlib.buildResources(Androlib.java:283)

at brut.androlib.Androlib.build(Androlib.java:206)

at brut.androlib.Androlib.build(Androlib.java:176)

at brut.apktool.Main.cmdBuild(Main.java:228)

at brut.apktool.Main.main(Main.java:79)

Caused by: brut.androlib.AndrolibException: brut.common.BrutException: could not

exec command: [aapt, p, --min-sdk-version, 15, --target-sdk-version, 15, -F, C:

\Users\GumZ\AppData\Local\Temp\APKTOOL9205491744427801309.tmp, -x, -0, arsc, -S,

C:\ICS Apktool\framework-res\res, -M, C:\ICS Apktool\framework-res\AndroidManif

est.xml]

at brut.androlib.res.AndrolibResources.aaptPackage(AndrolibResources.jav

a:357)

at brut.androlib.Androlib.buildResourcesFull(Androlib.java:336)

... 5 more

Caused by: brut.common.BrutException: could not exec command: [aapt, p, --min-sd

k-version, 15, --target-sdk-version, 15, -F, C:\Users\GumZ\AppData\Local\Temp\AP

KTOOL9205491744427801309.tmp, -x, -0, arsc, -S, C:\ICS Apktool\framework-res\res

, -M, C:\ICS Apktool\framework-res\AndroidManifest.xml]

at brut.util.OS.exec(OS.java:89)

at brut.androlib.res.AndrolibResources.aaptPackage(AndrolibResources.jav

a:355)

... 6 more

C:\ICS Apktool>
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] akkay1:
Hi Guys,

I have GNex just purchased a day ago. It has showing 784 or somthing of total RAM but i read in spec that it has 1GB ram.

2nd question is about keyboard, that in stock sms application when i am writing a message to some there is no enter key showing in key board. Have a look on attached screen shot.

Waiting for you valuable comments.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] najaboy:
1) The rest of the ram is reserved for GPU, baseband, etc.

2) By design, as an enter key would be counterintuitive, as it would directly contribute to keystroke errors that could cost the end user money (i.e., incomplete texts inadvertently sent when trying to press a letter).
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] voodoobabaloo:
Words fails me. I am so disgusted I have ran out of expletives so I won't bother repeating them here. Seriously...voice dialer is STILL not working! This update was specifically designed to fix this bug and it is still not working. I just can't understand what is so hard about putting back in functionality that was working before in ICS and was necessary.

This is the sort of thing that gets people to switch over irrevocably to apple. This has been going on for like a year now. It is starting to feel like it is being done on purpose for God knows what reason. Does it work for anyone else?

android 4.2.2

i535VRBLK3

AOKP
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] BattsNotIncld:
What update? This phone is officially on 4.1.1 . You are not guaranteed anything by running custom software.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] voodoobabaloo:
Fair enough. Although I never said I was guaranteed anything and apparently we are also not guaranteed to have important functionality (aka voice dialer) to work from one official release to the next. It worked fine when I had ICS it just broke when I was upgraded to JB. I would prefer not to have to root my phone to get it work, but if I waited for the official channels then I will likely have to wait until I get my next phone for a fix.

Both Google and AOKP mentioned that bluetooth issues were fixed with 4.2.2 and I was inquiring whether this worked for others as it did not work for me. Neither 4.1.1, nor 4.1.2 nor 4.2.1 nor 4.2.2 nor any of the other little hacks others have tried have worked and I know others on the official release of 4.2.2 for Nexus had similar problems so I was hoping someone might have run across a solution.

I know I sounded snarky, but I am just really frustrated.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] CM-Freak:
So I do not know if this will help you but I had pacman rom and the dialer wasn't working so I reflashed, no wiping and it fixed it.

Also there is always the option of going back to the stable TW roms. Which is what I did. You can't be mad for things not running smooth when you're running custom roms that make no claims of stability.

Via my S3 CleanRom 5.6
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] voodoobabaloo:
Thanks for the info, it was definitely worth a try. Alas the pacman rom did not do the trick. I had the official JB TW update and that is what broke my phone in the first place and I am not really interested in going back to ICS since I got the new phone so I can get Jelly Bean. I have also tried CleamROM and the the latest CM, AOKP and liquidSmooth 4.2.2 along with the just released gapps-jb-130301-signed.zip. No dice.

I'll keep banging away and let everyone know if I find a solution with other ROMs or tweaks.

I am not mad about custom ROMs not working properly I am mad about the official release breaking critical functionality for me.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] ZR1000A1:
I tried PK and PA ROMs in addition to aready mentioned. Voice dial does not work in any of them. I also tried Ktoonsez kernel - no dice. I think it's a major JB problem and there won't be any working ROM until Google fixes the issue. I just stopped trying :crying: ...
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] t0mmyr:
Does anyone know what will happen if I try run the OTA update that downloads on the stock Sprint rom while I'm temporarily booted into FF18 from CM9 (by flashing boot_FF18.zip from my internal sd card/multiboot folder while in CWM)?

I can only imagine 4 or 5 outcomes:

a. ota update reboots phone back to cm9 and nothing happens

b. tempboot is so awesome and smart that it allows ota to update the temp boot partiion only and doesnt flash over the radio or recovery

c. ota updates everything back to stock including radio and recovery

d. ota breaks something giving me a brick

e. something else unexpected?

Has anyone tried to see what happens? I was always afraid to try the FF18 update while tempbooted into EL29 a while back and never got around to asking this similar question back then.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] BluesRulez:
It is destined to fail for sure. Ota update will look for stock recovery and won't find it so nothing will happen. I am guessing this. But are you planning to try this? If so, I would say don't do it.
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] ftwaynejuggalo16:
I did it once just to see and all it did was boot into recovery and said some error and I booted back into my rom
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] PanchoPlanet:
I would bet on option "e".

Pp. :)

Transmitted from another galaxy with a Jellybean infused P-5113 full of Unicorn porn.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] Joecascio2000:
http://www.androidpolice.com/2013/0...4-1-2-build-ls970zvb-starting-to-trickle-out/
[AT&T LG Optimus G] carrett:
Don't hold your breath...

Also, better things are forthcoming...
[AT&T LG Optimus G] tmease1:
Was this official ota's or just a soak test?
[AT&T LG Optimus G] SilverWolf12:
It is unsure at this point.

From the link in the OP.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] tmease1:
From having previous experience with Att and Android it could still be a while. Att gets in no hurry for updates. I don't know what is involved with their testing of new firmware but it's ridiculous.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] Snow_fox:
I think the testing isn't what kills it... I think att doesn't test at all half the time. What do they have to lose if we don't get updates. People rarely get mad at carriers when the manufacturer can be blamed.

It would not surprise me find out att won't push the update because it says "lg" at the top of the phone instead of "att"
[AT&T LG Optimus G] dbgeek:
and why incur the cost, if there's virtually no recourse for not releasing the updated OS. But if that's going to be the case, have the manufacturer release the upgrades, requiring that their own crapware is included in the release.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] crward:
Guys, you've got to remember that us, the people on XDA, arent the majority. Most people don't know what jellybean is and if they do they couldn't tell you the difference in jelly bean and ICS. AT&T knows this so they don't bother with updates, they're lazy and couldn't care less about the minority. Honestly, i don't think any of the people who handle the updates at AT&T know whats new in jellybean. Maybe they should hire some xda devs to handle their updates haha
[AT&T LG Optimus G] bassitone:
Heck, with how well this phone runs on ICS, aside from getting Google Now I'm still not entirely clear on what the JB ROMs we have give us, and I generally pay attention to these things...

Sent from my LG Optimus G - I can't believe it's not Project Butter!
[AT&T LG Optimus G] crward:
I completely agree, I'm honestly kinda scared that the jellybean update could make the experience worse, at least an official update. This is the best phone I've ever used, even with ICS and little rom support. We've got great devs and even the stock experience isnt bad. Plus, google now is cool but I'm happy with this phone as is, I've got my nexus 7 for that haha
[AT&T LG Optimus G] stevenlarson:
I had CM10.1 on my last phone, I really don't feel like I'm missing anything significant at all with rooted stock ics on this phone...
[AT&T LG Optimus G] jdock:
I'm happy with rooted stock as well, except that I am hoping for a reduction in the excessive msm_hsic_host wakelocks that drain our batteries (seems this was fixed on the Nexus 4).
[AT&T LG Optimus G] xboxfanj:
It's quite a bit faster on jellybean and has Google now and a different font and a better modem.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] freebee269:
does this means that a dev could get the update rom from sprint and port it to att? or are the phones too much dissimilar to do that?
[AT&T LG Optimus G] tnayrbj:
We have jelly bean already. I am running the version found in the developer section and I love it
[AT&T LG Optimus G] Joecascio2000:
I've been on SnowJB for a while now. It's still about the principle. Sprint released jb, even if it is just a soak test. AT&T is usually the last to get out updates for devices that have been released on multiple carriers. From my experience and research it is usually T-Mobile first, Sprint second, and ATT/Verizon tied for last.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] drwario:
No update anytime soon. Trust me. Att wants you to buy new hardware. (Lgog pro)

They make money buy getting new contracts. After new og hits we get jb. I had HTC vivid there was no ICS till onex was out
[AT&T LG Optimus G] gunnyman:
Which version of the LGOG sold world wide is closest to ours?

i'm used to the One X and Rogers&At&T being identical.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] Joecascio2000:
That makes no sense because everyone who bought a LGOG shouldn't be anywhere close to getting another two-year contract. The LGOG is only 5 months old.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] Alpione:
Definitely. I'd like to see things out faster, too, but you hear a lot of pure speculation and conspiracy theories around here.

A
[AT&T LG Optimus G] Jank4AU:
It does make sense. When you go into the AT&T store they're going to tell you the new LGOG is 2-3 iterations of android ahead of the old LGOG, and look at these cool specs. If you go to the store and they are both on JB and the old one (probably 6 months old by then) is $50 and the new one is $200... some folks will have a hard time justifying the added $150 based on hardware differences alone. But if you can scare them into thinking that old phone has an obsolete OS, then your going to have an easier time with the up sell.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] charleswesde:
The people who don't know/ don't care/ don't want a software update faaar outweigh the few of us who want it. There is no benefit to any carrier pushing an Android update out, if anything it hurts them, software updates are huuge call drivers, when it's all said and done it costs them more money and creates more dissatisfied customers than not releasing the update at all.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] id10terrordfw:
Most of said customers buy iPhones anyway. When I was in the store getting this LGOG, I was shocked how many people were in there to get the free 4. Not even the 4S mind you, the four.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] eHawleywood:
It makes a little sense if you're looking at new user/upgrade versions... they can sell the new phone harder saying it has the newest android and try to get that extra 100 or 200 dollars instead of people just going with the LGOG for 99/49/free
[AT&T LG Optimus G] bqd37340:
They don't give a ****. They want you to purchase a second line, knowing full well you will use it as your primary to get the subsidized phone. They will NOT release JB until after the new hardware.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] crward:
How's battery life compared to ICS? Better, worse or about the same? In your experience that is, I'm just curious lol
[AT&T LG Optimus G] Timberline:
removing bloatware and regaining the ability to tether means I'm going to end up installing a custom ROM I guess
[AT&T LG Optimus G] xboxfanj:
Seems better. Android OS takes up less now too.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] crward:
Well a little better is better then nothing, they really should of fixed that issue all together though. Oh well, thanks for the info!
[AT&T LG Optimus G] MNDZA:
The most ridiculous issue that should have been fixed immediately is the screen response issue when the phone is plugged into the wall. That's not acceptable at all.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] xboxfanj:
Seems better on jb. Using this right now when plugged in and no issues. Zv9 on sprint fixed it mostly but zva seems to have it gone completely as long as the phone doesn't get hot.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] freebee269:
this is the issue my friend's lgog had when i played with his when he got it on release. scrolling through the UI the phone would be unresponsive at times like it would just move really slow even though you're trying to make it move really fast. or it would pause during scrolls. i didnt notice if this only happened when it was plugged in to the wall. i have snowjb's rom on my lgog and this issue is not existent.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] Matt James:
Im just fine with ICS right now and dont really dig all the bugs that come with ROM's (half working camera, bluetooth not working, garbled text sometimes, etc.) I've rooted and flashed the hell out of my last 2 phones and I'm just kinda "over it" right now, if you know what I mean? The bloatware doesnt bother me and takes up such a small amount of the storage space its practically invisible. Also the phone is already so damn fast and smooth I dont wanna risk that performance and stability for a half baked ROM. The only thing I would like is Google Now though I'm not dying for it and "photosphere" but thats only for 4.2.2 and the Nexus I believe. So yeah...I'll just settle with ICS until ATT drops the update.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] ChiefWilNel:
100% this, not to knock the devs work they are true saints. but having ics/jb on my atrix i really couldnt tell the difference except things that shouldve worked in ICS were working, kinda in JB.ICS on my LGOG is nice , I like the UI. I might think differently about Keylime when it comes out.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] t-readyroc:
I'm with the both of ya. Hopefully, though, by Keylime, we'll have CM & won't need to worry about waiting on ATT anymore.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] Nastybutler:
I don't know what you guys are talking about. SnowJB is completely stable and functional for me. The only minor issue I have is sending/recieving video/photo texts, and I think that may have something to do with my cut rate carrier (Straight Talk). I'm loving Google Now, and the GN widget. I'm loving the expanding notifications. And I'm loving the speed and battery life the ROM has. The Base ROM as a daily driver was very good. SnowJB is great.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] Matt James:
While SnowJB is probably awesome, I was browsing the thread for it and noticed too many people having issues I just dont wanna deal with at this time. I send and receive picture messages a lot so if they break for me, maybe its carrier I dont know, thats just a deal breaker. :(
[AT&T LG Optimus G] Jank4AU:
Make a nandroid, wipe everything, including system, then install and give it a try. You can always restore. Some/many of the issues may be install problems.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] freebee269:
i send picture messages alot also. i have went back and forth between snowjb v1.1 and aosp 4.2.2 about 3 times now. i have never had to mess with the APN settings in order to be able to mms, and this with an android and iphone doing mms. if it was going to have an issue it definitely would with iphone's silly imessage. it also easy to go back to stock rom if you dont like 4.1.2. you really have nothing to lose but time by trying it out. something tells me though you wont be going back to stock.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] droidiac13:
I found out yesterday (very trustworthy source) that AT&T was informed two weeks ago, by LG, that an update to JB was ready for the Optimus G. Let's get that rolling out AT&T!
[AT&T LG Optimus G] Matt James:
What was the source? As far as I was aware...AT&T adds all their good stuff to the update. I would find it odd that LG would be in charge of adding their bloatware and such for them, but hey, I could be completely wrong about how this all works behind the scenes. I dont think ANY of us actually really know who does what first. However this is pretty cool news....I hope its not a bunch of fluff.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] droidiac13:
You're correct in that AT&T needs to add their sh!t to it. LG is done with it and it is in AT&T's hands now. But hey, you can believe what you want.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] Matt James:
Thats exactly the process I thought went down. LG makes it work on AT&T's version of the phone, hands to AT&T and the add their stuff and then send it out to us. It could be a month or 2 but I got my fingers crossed. I literally hit the update button almost every day :p
[AT&T LG Optimus G] blenkows:
Didn't LG specifically say they'd be done with JB for this device in Q4 of 2012? I assumed they were done and AT&T was the one holding this process up this whole time.

Guess it was LG after all?
[AT&T LG Optimus G] freebee269:
That is good news if your source is right. Now we just have to wait for at&t to get around to doing what they do to the update which can take who knows how long. Then they have to do the splash test. Thank god for flashable roms already being out.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] droidiac13:
Certainly sounds as if it was LG holding it up since AT&T just got it.

I am confident in my source. And I agree, thank God for flashable ROM's!
[AT&T LG Optimus G] Neroga:
We can probably thank Sprint for this. Maybe AT&T doesn't wanna lose people like us to Sprint simply because their LGOG has JB and we don't lol.

Sent from my LG-E970
[AT&T LG Optimus G] :
Gingerbread for the Captivate was leaked (with AT&T's branding) almost a year before it came out. They've most likely had the JB update for a while. I doubt they even think about releasing until after the Pro's release, or 1-2 months after Rogers' release like they do on most phones.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] droidiac13:
Exactly. Just because AT&T has it, doesn't mean much, but they did just get it within the last two weeks. We all know how AT&T works. Upgrading our phones could take away from the Pro and HTC One sales. I guess my only point is that LG took their sweet time getting it to AT&T. Which does surprise me.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] blenkows:
I might be understanding him wrong because I'm half asleep and sick, but I think he's saying AT&T has had it for a while and THEY'RE the ones to blame for us not having JB right now, rather than LG. At least that's the way I'm interpreting it
[AT&T LG Optimus G] :
Yep. Even if they didn't "have" it, if they cared enough they would have asked or done something. Unless it is a Nexus, it won't get updated on any sort of timeline.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] droidiac13:
I understood. I was agreeing that no matter how long att has had it, they still have to put their special sauce on it. And I was also saying they just recently got it from LG.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] xboxfanj:
If CDMA variants get it before you, att is the hold up. There are very few changes needed between the e975 and e970. The camera drivers are different, but they have them working. You do have SD, but that is a very minimal change. It is surprising that Canada doesn't have it yet though. Could be the low sales there, which make it a low priority.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] bleached45:
But... it CAN be a Nexus.

:D
[AT&T LG Optimus G] Matt James:
AT&T just released JB for the Xperia TL today so hopefully we are not too far behind.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] cerps:


Droidiac,any idea if the update LG has for AT&T was 4.1 or 4.2?
[AT&T LG Optimus G] spiderkr:
We all are waiting for 4.2 but at&t will give us 4.1 after google present 5.0 ))
[AT&T LG Optimus G] REDFOCZ:
Sounds about right

Sent From my Galaxy Note 2
[AT&T LG Optimus G] droidiac13:
Droidiac,any idea if the update LG has for AT&T was 4.1 or 4.2?[/QUOTE]

I'll check and also see if I can get a status update.
[AT&T LG Optimus G] lifeofe:
This is definitely a frustrating aspect of not dealing with the vendor directly. Having to wait for the carrier to release it's own chopped up version of things, if they offer one at all. There should be an option to get the "vanilla" flavor of things from the vendor. Of course all this has been said over and over before. :)
[AT&T LG Optimus G] xboxfanj:
LG isn't quick either. It'd be ideal if Qualcomm gave us some builds.