yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] roccoxxxx:
Yes ur right
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] cctoro:
What is mean by WiFi "(partially)" in the working list. Did you get it to connect? If you did how? I still can't connect, when I try it says network list - empty.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] mamenyaka:
I made some research and it turns out that the WiFi problem is somewhat ubuntu's fault. There is documentation about the wifi issue, and even the Nexus 7 tablet has it. There is some method involving adb and phablet-network-setup, but I didn't got it working yet.

Also there are lots of reported bugs about this unable to connect problem.

Nexus 7 problems

phablet-network-setup
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] cctoro:
I'll try it out, the new image keeps locking up on me though. Can you show me how you create the Ubuntu Touch image files so I can help you keep this up to date?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] mamenyaka:
It's same as building CM, just use the repos from my github.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] cctoro:
Breakfast?

I'm trying to building cm10 but I'm stuck at:

breakfast codename

What do I use for our codename? Can I even use breakfast. Not sure what to do. This is what I what I get.

root@christian-Inspiron-1420:/home/christian/git-1.8.1.2# breakfast android_device_samsung_n8013

breakfast: command not found

What am I supposed to do from here.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] mamenyaka:
First, we do not need breakfast, because we are using our custom repos, breakfast is for the stock CyanogenMod repos, we do not want that.

Second, I'm guessing that the command not found error is caused by not running . build/envsetup.sh. For Ubuntu Touch, the envsetup.sh also pulls libhybris.

The only command you need after setting up all the repos is:

$ brunch n8013

EDIT:

Also, we need to pull (update) the ubuntu/platform-api repo, which uses bazaar (ubuntu's git-like tool), so after installing it just do:

$ bzr pull
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] cctoro:
When I run:

$brunch n8013

I get:

============================================

PLATFORM_VERSION_CODENAME=REL

PLATFORM_VERSION=4.2.1

TARGET_PRODUCT=cm_n8013

TARGET_BUILD_VARIANT=userdebug

TARGET_BUILD_TYPE=release

TARGET_BUILD_APPS=

TARGET_ARCH=arm

TARGET_ARCH_VARIANT=armv7-a-neon

HOST_ARCH=x86

HOST_OS=linux

HOST_OS_EXTRA=Linux-3.5.0-34-generic-i686-with-Ubuntu-12.04-precise

HOST_BUILD_TYPE=release

BUILD_ID=JOP40D

OUT_DIR=/home/christian/out

============================================

============================================

PLATFORM_VERSION_CODENAME=REL

PLATFORM_VERSION=4.2.1

TARGET_PRODUCT=cm_n8013

TARGET_BUILD_VARIANT=userdebug

TARGET_BUILD_TYPE=release

TARGET_BUILD_APPS=

TARGET_ARCH=arm

TARGET_ARCH_VARIANT=armv7-a-neon

HOST_ARCH=x86

HOST_OS=linux

HOST_OS_EXTRA=Linux-3.5.0-34-generic-i686-with-Ubuntu-12.04-precise

HOST_BUILD_TYPE=release

BUILD_ID=JOP40D

OUT_DIR=/home/christian/out

============================================

and it just hangs for a while. Is this normal?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] mamenyaka:
From now on, this project has a new member: Please welcome cctoro!

He has the n8013, so he will be building and testing images for that device.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] mamenyaka:
Look here to find out what new apps are now available in UbuntuTouch!
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] hiruna:
I'm back

Hey people,

Ive been busy these days and stopped working on my native linux images for this device.(arm versions) It was successfull but I didnt get much help.

So I decided to contribute to ubuntutouch. I have the N8010 (international wifi) version. I'll start to build and test out images. It'll be pretty much same as n8013 since there is no difference in terms of specs.

I kindly ask the owner of this thread to reply with the links on how to build the images.

Thanks
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] mamenyaka:
Hi!

Thank you for your interest, please ask if you need any help.

You should follow the porting guide, only use the repos from my github linked in the OP.

So just pull the UbuntuTouch source with phablet-dev-bootstrap, put in the local repos, and you're done.

There will be an updated porting guide, because Ubuntu Touch is now on flipped container, so the newer ubuntu builds don't work with our image, so just stick to the raring image for a while.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] hiruna:
Thanks for the info

Thanks for that, I'm setting up for building at the momemnt, I didnt understand what "You'll also need to set up the tools PPA. This will also install the repo tool, used to sync the Android repositories. Learn more about the repo tool. " meant. I clicked on the "set up the tools PPA " and completed the first step. and then in the porting guide, the "phablet-dev-bootstrap " is currently proccessing in the terminal. so my next question is which codename do i use? cm10.1 supports my n8010 BUT there is no n8010 cm image, instead i had to use n8010 which is the same and works fine(when i used to have cm installed). So do i proceed with the automatic setup ( breakfast >codename< ) or do i have to manually set up the enviorment ?

Thanks
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] mamenyaka:
No, don't use breakfast. And for n8010 you should use n8013. I don't know what is the difference.

So just put this file in .repo/local_manifest/ (delete the non-samsung stuff) and repo sync it.

Then just brunch n8013.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] guru_root:
Hey Guys,

Anyone installed this on N800?

If not, I am downloading it now. Will try it sometime tomorrow and post the feedback.

But, its great that someone is working on getting this on the the N800** devices.

Thank you :):good:
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] humberos:
The diference between N8010 and N8013 is basically the locale.

But both devices have the same hardware setup.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] coolfire000:
Waiting for more updates man. Just trying on N8000.

Thanks a lot for the effort:highfive::D:D:cowboy::cowboy::angel:
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] mamenyaka:
There should be a new port coming soon, as the guys at ubuntu make the container flip. So stay tuned!
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] chuaws:
i try this on my n8000, it freeze on the log screen. i can't log into the system. anyone facing the same issue?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] guru_root:
same here N8000 just stays on the login screen.

Screen does not turn on, I have lost the recovery as well. Looks like I'll have to re-flash recovery.:crying:
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] mamenyaka:
Yes, don't worry.

All you have to do is reboot. Than it will work. It's a problem with the ubuntu image.

How to reboot:

1. press and hold power button until device reboots

2. $ adb root; $ adb shell reboot
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] guru_root:
That worked :good:

But, at times I have to reboot multiple times as the touch does not work on the login screen.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] kilrain:
Question I haven't seen answered before, all hardware support aside, what can ubuntu touch do? Has anyone been able to get software up and running? Gimp, Open Office, etc? Or is it just a shell of an OS designed for preview only?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] mamenyaka:
Here you can look at what apps are available:

Core

Collection

The first Ubuntu Touch phone is coming in May 2014, called Ubuntu Edge. It will dual boot Android and Ubuntu Touch.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] DJsCrIBbLe:
That's a crazy ass campaign. The phone only gets produced if 32 million is reached ...
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] roccoxxxx:
Any news about ubuntu development?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] mamenyaka:
Thank you for asking!

Currently I am working on bringing flipped ubuntu touch to our device. I work together with the developers from ubuntu. Yesterday we had a day long irc chat, and it turns out, our device is a bit complicated.

In it's current state it boots to black screen, which is a HUGE achievement!, coming from a bootloop state.

Access through adb now defaults in the ubuntu shell.

A little more and we can have the newest of Ubuntu Touch, so hang tight!
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] roccoxxxx:
Thank u so much mamenyaka ...thanks for everything...
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] :
I seemed to run the newest build fine, except the the wifi not working.... Or is there another build that just came out?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] mamenyaka:
Every release up to this point was unflipped, meaning you would have an ubuntu shell on top of android.

There will be no more unflipped releases, even ubuntu has stopped releasing them like a month ago.

There is a new flipped build coming, but as I said, it's not yet working fully, so I won't upload it.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] mamenyaka:
Guys!

If you like my work, and especially if you like Ubuntu Touch, now is the time to show your support!

Please head over to this thread and read the instructions on how you can vote.

Please only vote if you mean it, my project is - you guessed it - porting Ubuntu Touch (to Sony Tablet Z).

Thank you! It would really mean the world to me!
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] roccoxxxx:
Ru stopping work on ubuntu touch for n8000?
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Reeseybaby:
Hello all fellow xda members,

I am having a huge problem. after downloading Samsung OTA this morning for I believe it was version 4.1.2 this small portion of

the version "about 3MB" was asking to install while I still had root. I should've figured after installing everything else that

this small version was to remove the root. and yeah after I install that small 3MB portion. My root was removed I tried to go

back into download mode and retrieve root access through that way. It was a epic fail it stop. I would like to know is any of the developers

trying to find a new loop hole to this now. Now when I go into download mode "due to this new update I believe" it says down the

bottom "QUALCOMM SECUREBOOT: ENABLE" if any of the developers need my assistance to try whatever new resolutions to gain root

back into this version of the S3. I will be more then happy to assist. While this new message is displayed. I can't even restore stock ROM back on my S3. anything you try to do under download mode it will fail.
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Reeseybaby:
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. any help or a simple response from any of the members that can assist me in resolving this at least would be greatly appreciated ugh
[Galaxy S III General] angel_strife:
Good day Mates!

I have an issue since omega rom v 42 with the screen cast feature, it does not connect at all!

Any one having the same issue (using different Samsung tv sets)

Rom: omega v43

Kernel: stock omega

Tv set works properly with s3 stock fw.

:) br's
[Galaxy S III General] Glebun:
this is not the help section
[Galaxy S III General] angel_strife:
Solved: just run the triangle away app and reset the flash counter.

Srry about the section though!
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] emilstyle:
Hi to all, i'm newbie and today it's arrived my new Xperia T...

I've a question... which is, at the moment, the best ROM for this phone ?

Not necessary the best, but one that work correctly and work better than a original ...

Thank you =D
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] gregbradley:
Thats for you to decide. the point about custom roms are that different people like different ones, they are "Customisable" to the individual taste.

So you question id like asking "what is better Pizza or Kebab?" different people will give you different answers and everyone will be right.

Also, these kind of threads normally degenerate into flaming anyway so its not worth asking, .

My suggestion, just try one for a week, then another then another, and choose the one you like best
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] emilstyle:
I love your quickly answer and i thank you so much, but my is not a question to create a flame... it's only a personal curiosity because i've seen about 20 different ROM for this phone... for example, for my old Galaxy S Plus, one of the best was Gigabread Plus Final...

I wanna only now one name of one rom that work good and optimize the mobile phone =D
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] gregbradley:
Stock Sony.

Sent from my LT30p xda premium app.

How do I customise the signature on xda premium app?
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] weebnuts:
Both, Kebab and Pizza!

But seriously, I think stock Sony is great
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] emilstyle:
Ok, i accept yours advice and i don't install nothing.. one more question... I've seen that it's possible upgrade my 4.0.4 android to 4.0.9 i think ... It's better the new version ?
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] gregbradley:
I have not heard of a v4.0.9, but my suggestion is try it and see
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] emilstyle:
ehm ehm, o my god.. wait... a no it's 9.1.a.0.489 ahahha =D i'm installing it because i wanna try the XperimenT Rom.. that inspire me... what you think about ?
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] gregbradley:
You dont need to do that. Just install the rom if you want. Follow the instructions in the OP
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] skaroger867:
Please don't flame me to death...

Can I root this device with an app? I have rooted other android devices with an app and i was wondering if this is possible for this device too?

Also from what I read tripping the flash counter voids your warranty, is it safe to say that's the only downside to it? Cause I don't care about voiding the warranty.
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] mt3g:
no, and yes tripping your flash counter voids it but only the software not hardware. Yes that is the only downside and you can reverse it anyways. not read the stickies to answer any of your further questions :) happy rooting.
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] skaroger867:
Thanks. And I will refer to the stickies to root
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] HrCorreia:
Hello everybody, I have a problem with my i9000 and my laptop, I today i dicided to format my laptop and install win 7, it's not the first time I've done it, but this time I haven't been able to successfully install the drivers to connect the laptop and the phone.

I believe that I try it all, download keys, download samsung driver for mobile phones x86, x64, windows update, tried to find the driver using the system32 folder from another pc where the i9000 is properly detected, and noting seems to work.

The only thing i haven't tried is to change the rom, but if the phone was correctly recognised by the laptop yesterday, this shouldn't be the problem, but currently i'm using SuperNexus 2.0 rom.

If any one have any ideia of what to do next i'm willing to try it out.

Best regards to everyone
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] HrCorreia:
Solved, i don't know why, but when i enable the usb tethering, it instaled all the drivers correctly.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] JoeFCaputo113:
Carbon ROM

Liquid Smooth ROM

I am currently running Liquid Smooth, but I'd like to know the difference between the two. I asked in the thread but no one responded to me :( any help would be greatly appreciated!
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] Fire Ball:
Try them both out and see which you like best! I use CarbonRom & love it. I can't really tell you about LiquidSmooth though because I only tested it once a few months ago.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] JoeFCaputo113:
Well could you tell me what features are on Carbon? Thanks!
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] -EViL-KoNCEPTz-:
Read the OP of the rom and/or flash it and find out for yourself.

I like to break stuff! :D
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] Fire Ball:
It's a little difficult to list all the features. I really just suggest you make a nandroid backup of your current setup & then flash CarbonRom to try it out for a little! Then you can always go back if you don't like it since you made a backup.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] topherk:
I'm currently on Carbon v1.3, but I think the differences between the two are nominal at best.

This is directly from the CarbonRom goo.im page:

Android 4.2.2

PIE

Xposed Framework (May cause stability or performance issues - use at your own risk!)

Comprehensive speed enhancements, including Linaro -O3 and processor-specific optimizations

Unofficial Voodoo Sound support on Note 2 and i9300 devices.

Option to hide lockscreen hints

Carousel lockscreen

Customizable lockscreen buttons and sliders

Chronus clock widget

Customizable hardware and software keys

Transparent navbar and status bar

Customizable navbar ring

Navbar arrow keys

Navigation bar widgets

Customizable power menu

Notification power widget

Notification brightness adjustment

Customizable quicksettings panel

Statusbar mods including center clock and color

LCD Density

Theme engine

Quiet hours

Volume rocker music controls

Full Rotation

Customizable battery and notification light

More that haven't even been mentioned, and more to come!

I know that Liquid doesn't have a feature list or changelog on their xda thread, but I have used it in the past. When I look at the list of items in CarbonRom, I can't see any that weren't available in LiquidSmooth. Maybe PIE wasn't available, I honestly can't really remember (I don't use it on CarbonROM anyways, any place I docked it would mess up one of my normal actions).

In my opinion, they're both extremely smooth, have excellent battery life, and are being developed. I personally like flashing updates more than the normal person (which I know could very well be a bad thing), so I went with Carbon since recently the updates have been more frequent (I have held off on 1.4, though, since I've heard of some issues in it that would affect my everyday use).

Anyways, as most people on here have already said (in much fewer words than I've used), any differences are minor and as long as you TB and Nandroid backup your stuff, you should be able to test-drive both ROMs in an afternoon and see which one you like.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] JoeFCaputo113:
Thank you. I was reading through the thread and I also saw a lot of problems with the new version. So I think I'll hold off. Plus the fact that Liquid is coming out with a huge update by the weekend!
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] stanleybeerz:
If you're a fan of the cLock, CarbonRom's version isn't completely functional.
[Asus Transformer TF700] lulu14150:
Hello boys,

I have build for you a new mod

Features:

- Wallpapers HD of last Ubuntu (.PNG;32bits)

- Original stock fonts of last Ubuntu (.zip for CWM)

For previews (Screenshot) and downloads see attachments !

Don't Flash "Ubuntu Stock Wallpaper HD by LucaS.zip", just extract it in any folder

It should work on any devices but make a backup before flash !

If you like my work, don't forget the "Thanks Meter" :)

Enjoy ;)
[Desire HD Accessories] Tornadexx:
Hello i got this wiimote few months ago and it was just lying around.. So finally i decided to do something with it.

As i understand its not suppose to work on stock desire cause bluetooth limitations and to unlock it you mas root your phone or something?

I am scared of rooting my phone cause my usb port is skrewed up, slightest touch disconnects it from charging so im afraid that in middle of some rooting process it might disconnect and brick my phone, So i was wondering if any of you have set up your desire hd with wii mote? what did you do? maybe there is other way doing it without rooting and maybe if rooting the only, which rom would be best for using wiimote and closest to stock rom?

Sorry if its in wrong section and for my english
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] edgarf28:
Where's the JKay framework thread!? :eek:

Why is it deleted?
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Glebun:
whoa, good question
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] pricey2009:
I think its finished.. app seems to be gone from playstore too?
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Glebun:
nope, its still there. and it can't be finished, i can bet money on it
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] pricey2009:
Thread is all gone though. Why would they delete it? Mods please explain I have paid money for the app I expect the thread to be there as well!
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kasperok:
Deluxe Settings is still available on playstore.

Waiting for info!
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] chreddy:
Jkay have explained why the thread is gone here: http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=38557049&postcount=712
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Glebun:
weird how it only became an issue now
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] chreddy:
Indeed. If I'm not wrong the Jkay thread have been there since August if not longer. And now suddenly it's deleted, Sorry, but that seems to be pretty stupid to me. :(
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] MIKEMON:
Well that's good and what to do?: Mad:
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Glebun:
nothing, he'll host it elsewhere. Jkay framework isn't going anywhere
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] anup123456:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=38558520#post38558520
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] pricey2009:
As others have mentioned chainfire is allowed link to paid app this is just bang out of order on jkay, different rules for different people or what!! Eeeerrrggghhh! :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tsubus:
I agree, that makes no sense.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] pricey2009:
Guys please vote for restore of the thread in the general section.

Let us be heard loud and clear :)
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kp.nikhil:
Vote thread closed
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Glebun:
Let's vote for reopening the vote thread :D
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] DSA:
Let's vote to see if we should vote!
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] :
Well said. It's bang out of order! Xda are Hypocrites... Seriously getting fed up with this site, and I wouldn't blame Jkay for leaving altogether.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] EricXson:
:(:(:(:( Verry stupid from XDA :(:(:(:(
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] donalgodon:
Unbelievable. :crying:
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kornelius1982:
That makes ABSOLUTELY no sense at all!

Very irresponsible decision from XDA!
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] JPsy Droid:
Nobody needs xda - the people here are needed, never forget this.

Shame on them.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Obagleyfreer:
I can pretty much guarantee it's all about money.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] masterex567:
He doesn't need to rely on xda.

If they removed his thread. He'll host it on his server and the framework will live on.

It's kind of unfair to remove the thread without a warning and since the thread has been alive for all this time.

Its just stupid to take an action now.

Well, if he hosts it on his server, I hope he puts Ads. That way he'll be able to earn some through that, and that will be good motivation for him. :)

Long live JKay!
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kornelius1982:
So you assume that other devs (with paid apps) just pay to XDA for distributing their apps?
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] eRPeeX:
It's always the same on XDA. If a dev becomes too successful they find a stick to beat the dog.

So mister moderator do you have the balls to defend/explain your decision to delete the JKay thread?
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] DSA:
This isnt a democracy

XDA dont have to explain themselves or do anything at all

Their choice, their rules...accept it or dont, it doesnt change anything
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] eRPeeX:
Obviously
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] beaver2233:
yes, maybe... though without developers (such as Jkay), there is no xda... (what JPsy Droid said above)
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] DSA:
not quite

lots of devs already left, xda is still here