yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] mnishamk:
It says device must be rooted, what it actually tries to say is bootloader is not unlocked.

Unlock bootloader, or try a kernel which works on locked one

Sent from my Xperia Mini Pro
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] iamwiki:
Rooting Status:

Bootloader Unlock Allowed: YES

thats what i see on my system / configuration
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] mnishamk:
Bootloader unlock allowed : yes means bootloader not unlocked.

bootloader unlocked : yes means bootloader is unlocked.

So urs is not, there a sticky in general for unlocking.

Then install it

Sent from my Xperia Mini Pro
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] Abhinav1997:
It's allowed but isn't unlocked...simply follow mihahn's guide in stickies in general and u will have unlocked bl then it may show bootloader unlocked : yes

Press THANKS if I helped,

Best Regards,

AJ
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] iamwiki:
ohhh ok thanks!!!!
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] iamwiki:
if im going to use PCC or UPDATER then i must relock the bootloader right?
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] Abhinav1997:
Ya for (f)ota and pcc updates bl must be locked :) Anyways try se bootloader unlocking tool as it will be easier for u to use :D

Press THANKS if I helped,

Best Regards,

AJ
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] iamwiki:
ok all hitted thanks!!
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] mnishamk:
The thanks button was introduced so that threads would be less cluttered by saying thanks (or saying I hit thanks:D)
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] iamwiki:
done! Successfully, rooted/unblocked/flashed/and now modified home.apk installed.
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Tunestwo:
Hello XDA,

Some how i can't instal the app power amp, i think its because i installed a cracked version first with a lucky patcher.

But i removed the illigal on and tried to instal the official one. Now im getting the error that i dont have enough space on my Phone while i still got about 8 gigs,

here are the specs:

I saw on a post that the lucky patcher left a file on your phone and you need to delete that to fix it. But i cant seem to find the file

Ty for the help!

Sorry for the bad english =(
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Tunestwo:
Bumb please :S
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] BigDig:
No help for pirates!
[One (M7) General] crea78:
According to Phandroid, HTC will only have one phone for the year of 2013. Article can be found here: http://phandroid.com/2013/02/26/htc-one-flagship/

This is a smart move on HTCs part instead of having multiple versions. Hopefully software updates will come a little quicker because of this move.
[One (M7) General] anit77:
I've been think about this lately. HTC isn't as big as as its competition. If they're going to launch the same unit globally they will need to focus their resources on it to be able to fill orders. Especially if it takes off.
[One (M7) General] Sunny88:
I really do hope that's the case. I've always thought HTC is mad for releasing so many variants and what not in a short amount of time. Its about time HTC came to its senses (lol). I've been wishing this would happen and cursing HTC for the One line (X,S,V,X+) etc the one S was the better one out of all in my opinion overall but lack of a 32gb model I had to hold on to my sensation for longer. Hopefully the One will change that. Seems good by reviews so far. Let's see
[One (M7) General] Maedhros:
My question would be:

Is it truly a good thing they only release one device a year? Assuming the M7 is top spec for when it is released (which it is) -what is so wrong with releasing a M7+ at the end of the year with S800?

Why would people get offended or pissed off by this?

Personally I have absolutly no issue. If people want to purchase a M7 body with S800 (or whatever) in 6 months, I don't see a problem so long as its financially feasible for HTC.
[One (M7) General] NiCk.JaY:
People deserve to have the latest smarphone from a particular OEM, for at least an year, and everyone can't buy new device for ~700$ every six months.
[One (M7) General] mouzaihem:
As to why this is good news for some people, it is sort of the way your top end automobile companies work (most for that matter).

Whether BMW, Mercedes, Audi, or whatever company: you have an expected timeframe of how long they will keep a car relatively the same without a major facelift (5-7 years). When you purchase an automobile from one of these companies, you know for an x number of years the car won't be different in any major ways (of course there are the yearly upgrades and all, but you guys know what I mean).

Well when you compare that to mobile devices-where it seems (and has really been set by Apple) that many companies give their flagship device a one year span, HTC doesn't. They have been doing refreshes half a year within the release of their flagship devices which makes some people feel like they paid all this money for a device that was outdated by the same company too quickly. Whereas Samsung and Apple have been on a one flagship a year schedule.

For most people who do upgrades and purchase a phone every two years, it is really irrelevant whether there is a refresh later in the year or not. But for others who purchase the devices unlocked and are smartphone addicts, it could lead to you purchasing from another company.
[One (M7) General] Maedhros:
But again... why exactly do people need a new device every 6 months...? I still fail to understand this.

Lets say HTC makes a great device for H1. People purchase this device.

They later refresh 6 months later with a superior process (best H2 can offer).

What do the people who purchased the H1 device loose? Perhaps resale value, but other then that, they don't loose anything.

Again, I fail to understand what is wrong with HTCs model. If anything it is BETTER for consumers because it means better tech is being pushed out earlier, and new devices are cheaper, allowing more people access.

The car model isn't a valid comparison imo... The price difference, combined with the fact that between model years- little changes in terms of performance (whereas cell phones will not refresh without a power upgrade) , makes cars and cell phones too dissimilar to compare.

Apple releases 1 device a year because it maxamizes profit. Consumers are stupid enough to believe that this is good for them, which is something I disagree with.
[One (M7) General] RobertN`:
nvm, /delete post pls.
[One (M7) General] Phil750123:
Ive read rumours before the m7 was announced about a m4 and q2.

So basically m7 high end, m4 middle, g2 low end. (all code names obv)

That to me is the perfect model htc should follow

http://htcsource.com/2013/02/new-images-reveal-a-familiar-looking-htc-m4/

http://htcsource.com/2013/02/htc-m4-and-g2-models-to-follow-the-m7-release/
[One (M7) General] matheus_sc:
I think so, this can creat a strong brand
[One (M7) General] matthiaswtf6:
The one surely is a great device and has lot's of buyers but is it really good to release just one ultra-high-end device for around 600 euros? I don't know many people (except of me and some of my friends) who will pay this much for a phone or would like such a big screen (even if there are phones with bigger screens around) so i think htc should release at least a mid class model with for example a 4" screen and maybe a low class model too..
[One (M7) General] shox22:
They will release lower/mid end devices for sure. I think they just want to release one HIGHEND device per year.
[One (M7) General] nfox25:
Nice Device

nice device i would like to buy one
[One (M7) General] katamari201:
What the hell was so confusing about the HTC One family from last year? The flagship was the HTC One X. That was it. That was THE ONE. There was a supercharged one called the X+, but that was sensibly named with an extra +. Much like an iPhone that was 32GB or 64GB. It was still very much the same device. The One S was their midrange. The One V was their low-end. Three different price points, three different sizes. It was never customer confusion that caused HTC to not be as successful. It was just their crappy marketing and crappy availability. Since HTC is undoubtedly going to release lower tier phones besides THE ONE, they will be back in the same position they were in last year, meaning all this THE ONE crap is meaningless.

Samsung has a bajillion phones besides the Galaxy S III of all different sizes and specs that all have the same shiny marble rounded look and it has not hurt them in the least. In fact, the Note II and Ace are one of the highest sellers along with the GS3. The One X, S, and V were wildly more different from each other in looks. It's not a problem of confusion. It's a problem with marketing.

HTC is also driving themselves in a corner without releasing more high-end phones that cater to more corners of the smartphone space. Where is the Note II competitor? What about a small screen phone with high specs? There are plenty of people who think phones are getting to big and would want a smaller phone that has as much power as their bigger brethren. The other rather non-existent niche that no manufacturer is really pushing in the modern era is the cameraphone. Sure Nokia had the 808 Pureview, but that was more fanservice for the dying Symbian platform than anything else. HTC could delve into a competitor for the rumored Lumia EOS device. The area is fresh and fertile with almost no competitors. If they are bold enough to drop out of the megapixel race for "ultrapixels", they should be able to go bolder and say that cameras on phones are crap because the sensors are too small. For a minor bump in thickness, the phone being still very pocketable, you get a real camera! And a phone you can actually hold instead of a sliver of something that looks like it will bend in half.

If HTC can't handle just having one high-end phone, I'm really questioning their competence , considering they are still a multi-billion dollar company. Ideally they are using all the resources to make THE ONE the perfect device with perfect software and perfect hardware testing and perfect everything, dedicating more people to this one device than any other manufacturer would to their own flagships. The more cynical person would also wonder if HTC hadn't had a giant layoff after the poor results in 2012 and have just cut the teams for all the other phones. The easiest way to profitability is to fire your workers.
[One (M7) General] kalo88:
I think it's a very sensible move

They can focus on providing solid software updates

Nothing annoys people like buying a phone and having them release a slightly better model a few months later or even introducing a new flagship!

Sony have an issue of releasing too many phones and not knowing which is the true flagship, I think they're trying to follow a similar path this year.
[One (M7) General] munchy_cool:
quoting from phandroid
[One (M7) General] coupetastic-droid:
I just watched pocketnow on YouTube and they announced that another windows 8 device will be dropping from HTC this year. I don't think it will be a high end device though.
[One (M7) General] Shasarak:
I'd like that too - but I don't think they could do that now, because they'd be undermining their own marketing of the One if they come out and say "all smartphone cameras are crap - including the one on our flagship phone that it's one of its major selling points".

Veering wildly off-topic :), something *I* think there's a niche for is a camera-oriented dumb phone. As it stands, if you want a new phone with an even half-way decent camera, you need to buy a high-end smartphone. There are many people (I suspect) who would love to see a device that is essentially a dedicated digital camera that can, as a secondary function, also send texts and make phone calls (but doesn't do smartphone stuff). There were some old Nokia and Sony Ericsson devices like that - the N93, for example - but no one seems to make them any more. I want a Xenon flash and a proper optical zoom. :cool:
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] lucascao1:
home > view certified products > certified product detail

Certified Product Detail

Below are all of the certified HW/SW versions of this product.

Manufacturer:	Sony Mobile

Model #:	LT30p (PM-0030-BV)

Supported Technologies

and Frequency Bands:	GSM: 850/900/1800/1900, UMTS FDD: Band I/Band II/Band IV/Band V/Band VIII

HW Version	SW Version	Request Type	Date Certified

A	9.1.A.0.492	ECO	Feb 26, 2013

A	9.1.A.0.489	ECO	Jan 31, 2013

A	7.0.A.3.223	ECO	Dec 11, 2012

A	7.0.A.3.212	ECO	Nov 9, 2012

A	7.0.A.3.197	ECO	Oct 30, 2012

A	7.0.A.3.195	ECO	Oct 24, 2012

A	7.0.A.3.193	ECO	Oct 18, 2012

A	7.0.A.1.303	Variant	Sep 25, 2012
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] romcio47:
Odp: Xperia T New FW 9.1.A.0.492 certified

Does the whole page need to be pasted here?
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Gasai Yuno:
492 is TX.

It also appeared on the page for V, along with 489. I think it's a DB error/input mistake.
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] del1701:
Sweet, I hope this fixes the walkman player bug :)
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] lucascao1:
Can not paste url because it is my first post in xda.
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] tomatos:
Today night I checking :) A next day comes the update.
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Alex Slane:
Does this mean well hopefully get a update to jelly?

About time the bugs were addressed.
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] nemer12:
maybe BRAVIA coming once again for Unlocked bootloader phones :( ? :-s

and true butter animations ? :)
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] gregbradley:
No chance. That is broken on purpose and is not a bug
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Gasai Yuno:
I still think, like I mentioned before (but no one noticed) that 492 is the TX specific build that appeared on V and T's pages by accident.

489 being T, 490 — V, and 492 — TX.
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] hesamodin:
look at this

http://www.ptcrb.com/vendor/complete/view_complete_request_guest.cfm?modelid=21834

its for lt30p xperia t
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] thienbrand:
7.0.A.1.303

7.0.A.3.197

7.0.A.3.212

Allof them is for TX and still appear on lt30p page.
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] ruwsoft:
7.0.A.1.303 - base version of LT30p

7.0.A.3.197 - for some markets of LT30p (eg poland, holland)
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] BenDesm:
In the official forum is neither confirms nor denies by a moderator...

http://talk.sonymobile.com/message/430541#430541
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] nemer12:
if it would be an acident like u say in the next second they would delete it from the site
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Gasai Yuno:
So where do I get 489 for Xperia V?

The V page says it was certified. Along with 492. Ref.: http://www.ptcrb.com/vendor/complete/view_complete_request_guest.cfm?modelid=22367

And 489 wasn't there until yesterday or so. 490 was. Then 489 and 492 appeared together.
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Andy:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2137464

No dupes please.

Thread Closed.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Sensation-al!:
so i sent my gnex in for repairs, (broken usb port) and i wiped everything clean, installed stock rom and unrooted/locked bootloader, but i completely forgot to return to stock recovery. (IE; TWRP is still installed) will i be fine to get the replacement or will they make a fuss?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] eyeisdasteve:
To Sprint or Asurion?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] jd1639:
How did you return to stock? If you flashed via Odin the custom recovery will be gone. If you flashed thru twrp it'll still be there.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] wund3rground:
I have sent countless phones back without putting them back to stock and I haven't heard a word. I wouldn't worry about it...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Sensation-al!:
Recovery Lol,
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Sensation-al!:
Wind Mobile (Canada)
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] deathpulse:
Hello Everyone,

I use wifi calling at home because t-Mobile's signal is weak. My S3 is currently running Darthstalker version X and is on Baseband t999uvdlc. When receiving or placing calls using wifi calling, the phone just randomly hangs up. It is still in range for excellent wifi signal and I have attempted both 2.4 and 5.0 ghz frequencies - both have the "random hang up" problem. Does anyone know a fix for this? Wifi calling seems to work perfectly on my Galaxy Note II - it is just the S3 that has the problem :(.

Thanks in advance!
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] Towle:
Have you tried it on other ROMs?
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] deathpulse:
Yes. It seems to happen on all the ROMS I tried. I think it was also happening on stock but can't remember.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] goldstein62:
Ok I need some help my buddy bought the S3 I9300 in India when he was there and it came unlocked and rooted, he asked me to throw a custom rom on it cause I'm pretty good with that stuff, so I got into recovery mode and did a nandroid and then wiped the cache did a system and wiped devalchick cache. Flashed the rom and it was successful and booted up everything worked fine but It would not connect to the AT&t network he cant make calls or send texts tried messing with his network setting and nothing would work, so I restored his phone back to original state and he still cant make calls or send texts anyone know what could be wrong check his IMIE number and everything is there and good everything works good just not the network....thanks
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Glebun:
flash a different modem. also make sure the i9300 supports AT&T's frequencies
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] goldstein62:
Where can I find the right modems it was running on at&t he wanted something smoother so I flashed the rom amd now it wont connect to any networks even when I reatored it back og rom
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] JDroid Freak:
Network gone

==========

happened to me twice upon updating my rom

what i did first is to checked my mobile netwrok then APN, restore the default APN and then reboot and if doesnt fixed it then change your modem

about the modem that is depend on what firmware or build you have, search xda and modems are lying around

Im using OMEGA ROM V44.1 and it is working perfectly on my S3

gudluck and hope this will help you
[HTC Droid DNA] johnwaug:
I have been searching the Web and this forum but can't find any solution to this game not working. I am s-off, Viper1.1.3, new radio. Thanks for any in sight ahead of time.
[HTC Droid DNA] Bigandrewgold:
I think you need to be on the ota software for it to work. And viper is still in beta testing for it.
[HTC Droid DNA] lazarus2297:
yes it works on the new 2.04 software update.. and on said ROMs that are based on the OTA... only problem is if you wipe data and don't use a program such as Titanium to back up your paid data apps.. then you will not be able to download it from the Playstore b/c the DNA now shows "not compatible" in the playstore... I don't think the DNA is officially supported but something they did in the OTA lets the app function normally..
[HTC Droid DNA] johnwaug:
Thanks for the info. At least I can tell my son hope is on the way with the new viper update.
[HTC Droid DNA] vargo911:
You can also find a 3rd party website that offers the AB SW in HD for free and be able to play with the VZW OTA update.
[HTC Droid DNA] lazarus2297:
How can they offer the HD for free... Unless its pirated...
[HTC Droid DNA] Bigandrewgold:
If you already bought it on the Play Store then it's not illegal to download it for free.
[HTC Droid DNA] lazarus2297:
I understand that but where else would you download it other than from the Playstore... if that's where you bought it? If it's legit then I would like to download the apk so I can sideload it on my DNA as I purchased the app the day it came out..
[HTC Droid DNA] vargo911:
Google is your friend, look it up. :)
[HTC Droid DNA] lazarus2297:
ok so all the sites I see on Google are hosting pirated apks....

If your 3rd party site is legit then why no post a specific link?

I kinda understand what you are saying.. that if I have purchased the apk via the playstore then it is ok download the apk via another source.. but I would contend that these sites are not set up for that reason and supporting them is not helping the issue..

*edit*

I am not trying to start an argument but surely we can agree that pirating protected content isn't cool... I am sure most "devs" on this site would agree...
[HTC Droid DNA] ickedmel:
Are you serious dude? If you legitimatly purchased the software you're worried about downloading a pirated source..... I'm sure no fbi or some swat team is going to bust down your door. If you're so concerned with what's right and wrong about some piece of software you already paid for then just message whatever company and just deal with it so that you have some piece of mind and don't lose sleep over downloading a apk you already paid for that you some how think it will support the pirates you're downloading it free from. Also my recommendation for your next phone go with iphone.
[HTC Droid DNA] lazarus2297:
I think I will pass on your phone recommendations for me, but thanks for the concern... :good:
[HTC Droid DNA] msturner79:
I really hope it works after we get working CM10 or 10.1.
[HTC Droid DNA] Jrocker23:
Did you ever do a a titanium backup?, if so just reinstall..

Thats how I got mine and woking great
[HTC Droid DNA] eddiecanuck:
I downloaded it from Amazon App Store, that's where I got all my Angry Birds games from.
[HTC Droid DNA] lazarus2297:
FYI

Rovio updated the app as of March 11.. I can now download the Star Wars Angry Birds HD and it plays just fine... I am on Newt's sense 5 port ROM but I don't think that makes a difference..
[HTC Droid DNA] Brax33:
I didn't have any problems playing before the recent update with the Hatka kernel on my DNA.
[HTC Droid DNA] jlevy73:
The latest version, which is 1.1.3 works fine on every Rom I have tried it on
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ahmadroz:
Hello

I have a problem in my galaxy note gt-n7000 that open camera phone display black screen

and wait for 5 sec then show below message attachment

Notes :- I can modify camera setting but i can take picture , i mean that application open normally

I need help pls,,,

Thanks
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ahmadroz:
This case happened after rooting by ExynosAbuse APK v1.40 from HERE
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ahmadroz:
The problem has been solved by download jellybean for GT-N7000 or you can download your current version of ics
[Nexus 10 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] able72:
Ok, I have a micro HDMI to VGA active adapter cable. I get the image on the monitor ok. It's a little off center, but I think I can adjust that on the monitor. The problem is, it's still transmitting in the 16:9 aspect ratio and my monitor isn't adapting it to letter box so the image is displayed out of proportion.

Anyone know if there is any way to get it to output the image in the correct 4:3 aspect ratio? Either with a center and crop or letterbox image?

Thanks in advance for your help.
[Nexus 10 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] able72:
Bump, anyone know if this is even possible or not?
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sapplegater:
Anyone able to get MMS working on Net10?

I have:

Data (H+)

Sending MMS

Text

Calls

Dont:

Receiving MMS

The APN I'm Using Is:

Name: NET10

APN: tfdata

Proxy: Not Set

Port: Not Set

Username: Not Set

Password: Not Set

Server: Not Set

MMSC: http://mmsc.cingular.com

MMS proxy: 66.209.11.32

MMS Port: 80

MCC: 310

MNC: 410

Authentication Type: Not Set

APN Type: default,supl,mms,hipri

APN Protocol: IPv4/IPv6

APN Roaming Protocol: IPv4/IPv6

APN enable/disable: Enabled

Bearer: Unspecified
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sapplegater:
Eveytime i try to use data I get this issue: See Photo
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] odnerd:
I am. Started this morning. Based on the Net10 forums, others are getting it as well.
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] sapplegater:
I am currently working with the Net10 CS to try to fix this issue will update if I find out anything.