yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Jaskaran498:
Ok, a user had already done this stuff while building ubuntu for my phone.

So i took those files from his repository by->

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<manifest>
<remote name="github" fetch="git://github.com" />

<project path="device/samsung/i9300" name="Androguide/android_device_samsung_i9300" remote="github" revision="master"/>
<project path="kernel/samsung/smdk4412" name="Androguide/android_kernel_samsung_smdk4412" remote="github" revision="master"/>
<project path="device/samsung/smdk4412-common" name="Androguide/android_device_samsung_smdk4412-common" remote="github" revision="master"/>
<project path="vendor/samsung" name="Androguide/android_vendor_samsung" remote="github" revision="master" />
<project path="hardware/samsung" name="Ubuntu-i9100/android_hardware_samsung" remote="github" revision="phablet-10.1"/>
</manifest>

I created a local_manifest folder in my root directory (please note it had already synced ubuntu sources in that dir), and put local_manifest.xml containing this code in it.

Then ran repo sync again (thats when I got "fatal: Invalid git file format: ...repo/repo/.git/clone.bundle", but I ran repo again and it fetched files successfully as i told above).

But it seems like somehow these files didn't come to directory (dont know how!)...

So i am thinking to download them manually,

Here is link to his repository for prop blobs-> https://github.com/Androguide/android_vendor_samsung/tree/master/i9300/proprietary/system

Please tell what should I do.

Here are other repositories by him->

i9300 Device-Tree: https://github.com/Androguide/androi..._samsung_i9300

Exynos4412 Kernel: https://github.com/Androguide/androi...msung_smdk4412

Exynos4412 Common device-tree: https://github.com/Androguide/androi...mdk4412-common

Proprietary blobs: https://github.com/Androguide/android_vendor_samsung

CM common vendor blobs: https://github.com/Androguide/android_vendor_cm

local_manifest & modified CM manifest: https://github.com/Androguide/Ubuntu-Touch_manifests

Platform source code: http://phablet.ubuntu.com/gitweb

If this repo didn't get files then its possible that other repos also didn't download any files.

EDIT:

Seems like something went wrong with xml, (I believe its "that" above error), so I will be trying things manually... :/
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Bert.C:
I wouldnt download them manually, the repo tool is your best bet.

local_manifest.xml file goes in .repo/local_manifests/ directory

Note the S at the end of local_manifests for the directory but not at the end of the .xml file - double check this in your build environment.
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Jaskaran498:
Yeah, my directory name is correct->

....repo/local_manifests/local_manifest.xml

Somehow the i9300 Device-Tree, Exynos4412 Kernel and Exynos4412 Common device-tree were sync (their respective files with directories are present in device/samsung/i9300/)

So now I am downloading Proprietary blobs to a separate folder using->

repo init -u git://github.com/Androguide/android_vendor_samsung -b master

After download, I plan to put them in device/samsung/i9300

Is it correct way?

I am thinking to download similarly CM common vendor blobs, local_manifest & modified CM manifest and I alrady got platform source code using

phablet-dev-bootstrap [then my directory here]

.

But I am unclear of how to put them in... Should I put them in device/samsung/i9300?
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Bert.C:
I think they need to go in vendor/samsung/i9300 iirc
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Jaskaran498:
Well... I just figured out root problem.

A file called "clone.bundle" is missing in ".../.repo/repo/.git"

Thats interrupting the repo from syncing completely.

I have tried re-downloading all stuff, but its still same.

Any solutions?

I have already tried redownloading repo a million times.

But still having same result. It displays following error->

fatal: Invalid git file format: .../.repo/repo/.git/clone.bundle

And so I decided to do things a little more manually, I am downloading prop blobs via->

git clone

Lets see how it goes...

EDIT:

Ok, it went pretty far till->

Export includes file: hardware/samsung/exynos/multimedia/openmax/osal/Android.mk -- /home/jaskaran/android/UbuntuPort/out/target/product/i9300/obj/STATIC_LIBRARIES/libsecosal_intermediates/export_includes
make: *** No rule to make target `/home/jaskaran/android/UbuntuPort/out/target/product/i9300/obj/SHARED_LIBRARIES/libandroid_runtime_intermediates/export_includes', needed by `/home/jaskaran/android/UbuntuPort/out/target/product/i9300/obj/STATIC_LIBRARIES/libsecosal_intermediates/import_includes'. Stop.
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....

Any ideas?
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Bert.C:
Id temporarily remove the the file android.mk in hardware/samsung/exynos/multimedia/openmax/osal folder from your build environment for now, dont delete it just move it to your documents folder or desktop for now and try a rebuild. I still think you need to fix the git/repo problem out first though.
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Jaskaran498:
well... moving android.mk didn't work, nor commenting out that library did.

Seems my only choice is to build a CM10.1 rom and copy missing stuff from it.

But hell, my internet is too slow... So can I copy Device/Samsung/i9300 (the device specific stuff) from Ubuntu folder to CM folder? (That will save me trouble of downloading device specific stuff again....) Or there are differences in two (between the Device Specific Settings used in Ubuntu and those used in CM)?
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Bert.C:
Nope copying your device/* folder would be fine. id also copy your vendor/* folder too to save time re-downloading the proprietary blobs.

The manin difference is that the ubuntu-touch repo/bootstrap method only downloads that base requirements so you don't get all the extra apps etc that you don't need.

If you are doing it the CM10.1 way then dont forget that you need to make some changes to your kernel aswel, I read that on the ubuntu-touch porting page.
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Jaskaran498:
ok... so i downloaded and built a cm 10.1 rom successfully...

and then decided to run ubuntu build in order to check for missing libraries...

and there are two strange things->

1) Ubuntu built didn't stop at any error (like earlier it used to, I didn't do anything).

2) So i just let it built in order to see results, for now, its been stuck for about an hour on->

Downloading ubuntu-touch-generic-initrd version 0.66
8353 blocks

Although my internet is real sloppy now a days, but is it normal?

PS-> the CM and Ubuntu directory are completely different, so no idea what it did for missing libraries...

And I can write anything in terminal, (though its stuck on those lines).... (see screenshot->)

EDIT:

Ok, rebuilt it... and it went forward, for now, I dont really have time to see whther it completes so i'll be leaving it like that to build and check back when I am home.

Btw any ideas about no error regarding missing libraries?
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Bert.C:
I haven't got a clue mate, I tried a build for my N7100 yesterday and that just got me stuck in a bootloop so I'm back on another rom at the moment until I either 1) try again and try and get a build up and running or 2) I quit with ubuntu-touch and try just porting a pure AOSP rom for the N7100.

I'm not 100% sure what I'd like to do yet.
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Jaskaran498:
I just tried the CM build, nothing goes past the first splash screen! (that GT-i9300 thing)!!!

Why man??? I build rom fine with no errors... then why?

I hope I got all proprietary blobs, here is folder structure->

device/samsung/i9300/proprietary/system

and this this directory there are 3 more folders as-> bin, lib, usr Is that correct of is it incomplete?

And I followed normal device procedure, firs initialize repo, get sources by repo sync, get device specific stuff by breakfast command, get proprietary blobs by that git repository as I told in above comments, build the rom. Thats it right? Do we have to build kernel or something also?

PS-> Got latest philz as recovery, hope I dont need to get CWM?
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Bert.C:
Same happened to my build, got 1 or 2 errors which took me all of 2 minutes to fix and the rest built fine. but it didn't boot, must be something to do with kernel but I'm not 100% sure what yet.

Also I think proprietary blobs go in vendor/samsung/i9300/

Search TheMuppets on github and see what directory they need to go in.
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Jaskaran498:
Well... seems like blobs are at correct place, when I place them in vendor folder, it gives me duplicate error....

And about kernel, I tried flashing some other kernel right after installation and the result was same :(

Did you manage to fix your problem?

And also, that Ubuntu compiled, but zip size was only 25mb!
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Bert.C:
I fixed my compile issues but didnt look into why it didnt boot.

And my build was only 38mb i think so that sounds about right.

I bet that its something to do with kernel why ot doesnt boot. And it needs to be a specific kernel as there are changes that need to be made to boot ubuntu.

Do a google search for ubuntu touch porting guide and youll see what kernel changes are needed.
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Jaskaran498:
Ok, so I decided to port it myself from scratch without using Andro's sources.

But I got a question, I know of two ways to get repository (both get different repositories),

1)->

phablet-dev-bootstrap [target_directory]

2)->

repo init -u git://phablet.ubuntu.com/CyanogenMod/android.git -b phablet-trusty

Should I use same directory for them?
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Bert.C:
The first one will probably bring the latest sources where as the second one will fetch the trusty sources. I think thats where my port failed because i used the latest sources but an older preinstall - i think youve just solved my non boot problem :) will try it this weekend.

If you do go for the tsecond option id create a new directory to make sure theres no conflicts and make sure you get the correct preinstall file.
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Jaskaran498:
wait, now look at this->

I GOT SUCESSFUL IN BOOTING IT :D And a major thanks to you dude :)

(though it was saucy and now I am working on trusty, on which I will also work on bugs).

Let me tell you what I did (in case it helps you)->

* Normally got sources by bootstrap (it was a few days ago, the sources were then saucy which are now trusty).

* Commented out "Device settings" in devicecodename.mk (devices/manufacture/codename).

* Created a blank document called "export_includes" (forgot directory, just make it in directory in which it gives error).

* Modded kernel (now this was real tricky and tuffest part and I myself dont remember what I did, but I managed to boot with adb's help for telling me problems).

aah yeah not much big help (lol), but I am happy that I managed to boot it, even though it was basically functionless. Working on newer version now...

And an advice, 99%, its your kernel thats culprit (if your zip built fine without errors, just forget it, its your kernel doing evil stuff now). I was building 6 consectively working zips and none of them was booting, but on getting correct kernel edits, all of them booted (tested one by one lol), although the builds beoree those six (7th and 8th and so on) builds didn't work, just didn't delete them in case.....
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Bert.C:
Yeah i thought i was working on saucy so i flashed that preinstall after my base so im going to try flashing the trusty preinstall and all should be good. If not ill double check my kernel edits. And try again.
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Jaskaran498:
Well... I am unable to get it to boot, and it seems like kernel. Any ideas how to port AppArmor to kernel??

I actually couldn't understand the tutorial on porting guide

And another question is that how should I include the already compiled *.so library files into build?

I mean, I just compared the working and non-working directories and found that in non-working build, following were missing in system/lib->

libandroid_runtime.so
libchromium_net.so
libdvm.so
libharfbuzz.so
libhwui.so
libstagefright_chromium_http.so

So I was thinking that if somehow I can include these files into my current build....?
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] ralfgm04:
updates?
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Bert.C:
I had a little go at it but it wouldn't boot so I gave up and went to building a new aosp ROM.
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Jaskaran498:
Wel... I lost my S3 when it fell from my roof by my hands accidently, but one thing, if you are trying the trusty sources and using trust image, it will never boot cos trusty image is only for nexus devices. You need to get saucy sources and image. Thats how i got it to work, but damn... my S3 is useless now and I dont think I will repair it, maybe I am going to get a nexus 5 this time...

Use this repo for saucy source->

repo init -u git://phablet.ubuntu.com/CyanogenMod/android.git -b phablet-saucy
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] abhijitdroid:
updates ???

I want to try ubuntu touch on my n7100. Can someone actually share rheir builds here with list of items not working in the build ?

I am not an expert in rom building so request you all developers to share your work here and I will test it.
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Bert.C:
I'll look into it next week mate if I get chance.
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] UnidH4x0r:
I don't think there are many builds that can let you use for day to day activities.. Too bad Canonical only has developed it for the Nexus line.
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] m.b.jikre:
Where is the working link, Error:

"Not Found

The requested URL /ubuntu-touch-preview/daily-preinstalled/current/quantal-preinstalled-phablet-armhf.zip was not found on this server.

Apache/2.2.14 (Ubuntu) Server at cdimages.ubuntu.com Port 80"
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] stvn1337:
Right here... LINK
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Yo_MaMa:
any updates?
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] johnoo:
Does any of these roms works on Galaxy Note 2 LTE? GT-N7105??

Hello guys,

Is anybody using ubuntu touch on lte n7105 version? I'm asking because I'm about to buy it and plan to start using and hopefully learning to help develop ubuntu touch or make some apps for it on this phone can anyone confirm usability on n7105?

Thank you

btw. cant find exact answer anywhere online not even here. THX
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] DerTeufel1980:
It's no problem to get it booting, but without support for any phone function, it's totally useless

Gesendet von meinem GT-N7105 mit Tapatalk
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] Yo_MaMa:
So.... Officially dead?
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] krazzykiller:
I don't know a lot about this. But I would love it. I'm a Linux guy anyway. I've been watching this thing for years. And it seems like there just isn't enough interest in this old phone and Linux. Wish I had the time and energy to do it myself. After all there is 40 million plus note 2's in the world and most of them are probably collecting dust someplace. It would be good to do something with them all.
[Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S III Developer Discussion ] :
I know this an old thread. But with new Ubuntu for phones having so.many cool features, I was thinking if anyone could build a new one? Ubuntu for phones has very minimal hardware requirement, it ran pretty smoothly on a Nexus 4 at MWC 2016. I was thinking it would give the note 2 a new lease of life?

---------- Post added at 06:07 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:04 PM ----------

@Trafalgar Square [MENTION=4365701]psndna88[/MENTION] what do you think about this?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] galaxys s:
im trying latest this rom...thanks
[Galaxy S II Android Development] malavan:
lol where is the download link?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Phalanx7621:
Re: [ROM][Jellybean 4.2.2][JDQ39] ThinkingBridge ROM [I9100][Feb 24,2013][Beta 1]

Its a button named ROM.

Doesnt work for me through tapatalk though, just force closes tapatalk. I guess thats why he suggests using the PC.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] -Grift-:
For those who cant find it

Rom: http://goo.gl/mTJVO

Gapps: http://goo.im/gapps/gapps-jb-20121212-signed.zip
[Galaxy S II Android Development] malavan:
I was too quick on the download button
[Galaxy S II Android Development] 911-Future_Maker:
Looks nice man! It's always great to see another S2 rom on the road. :D I'll give it a try.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] shubham.dhand:
Re: [ROM][Jellybean 4.2.2][JDQ39] ThinkingBridge ROM [I9100][Feb 24,2013][Beta 1]

+1

always happy to see a new rom..
[Galaxy S II Android Development] AvivEliyahu:
Loved the design on the topic,really nice..giving it a try!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] ammarsg:
where is the link for 24-2 2013 only 17-2 2013 and stable or not is there shortcut in notification or widget shortcut thx for nice rom and want mor screenshot about setting and how many navbar quantity 5 or 7
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Christian Nothing:
Re: [ROM][Jellybean 4.2.2][JDQ39] ThinkingBridge ROM [I9100][Feb 24,2013][Beta 1]

The new version of this rom has been delayed cuz of few bugs .

It will be released soon when the rom will be stable.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] marcel112:
i flashed this this morning.....till now looks stable and good for me......

Will follow the thread to see the progress :good::good::good:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] marcel112:
Every time when i try installatie tapatalk or xda app it fc's ... Both !!!

It's nog the phone..

First ROM i get this...

Any idea?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] hughfollett:
R: [ROM][Jellybean 4.2.2][JDQ39] ThinkingBridge ROM [I9100][Feb 24,2013][Beta 1]

Delete data of the app..

Inviato dal mio GT-I9100 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Android Development] marcel112:
thnx for the reply but that doenst solve the fc's....

i wiped data off the app's and deleted them both.

rebooted the phone and installed the apps again....

after putting in my credentials and 1 wanted to choose : i9100....

FC.... same on both aps???!?! :crying::crying:

I flashed the rom with full wipe btw
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Redscorpian:
Wifi tether - again!

No Wi-Fi tether. Any solution?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Christian Nothing:
Re: [ROM][Jellybean 4.2.2][JDQ39] ThinkingBridge ROM [I9100][Feb 24,2013][Beta 1]

Here try this app

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.googlecode.android.wifi.tether
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Redscorpian:
Hmm, yeah I tried that before coming here. Perhaps I should have stated the obvious. It doesn't work, won't wifi tether whether you select the tick box in settings, the toggle in the taskbar or install several apps that claim to tether. It's likely to be an android 4.2.2 problem being 'adapted' that won't get fixed as this problem has persisted on some other/earlier roms.

So, any working solutions?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] don1bong:
Re: [ROM][Jellybean 4.2.2][JDQ39] ThinkingBridge ROM [I9100][Feb 24,2013][Beta 1]

We "Team BRIDGE" are here, attempting to compile Jelly Bean 4.2.2 Build JDQ39 from Android Open Source Project (AOSP). This thread is created to provide you people with the change logs, downloads, Instructions, bug submissions and development updates. So, kindly take over your ROM discussions to the Discussion thread under General Section, no appreciation posts or discussions are accepted here. If you like to appreciate, please press the THANKS button instead.

Quote from first page..

I might be wrong but I'm pretty sure it says take DISCUSSION to the DISCUSSION thread
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Christian Nothing:
ok guys like 'don1bong' said please take all non-dev related bugs to this thread and let this thread to be the dev thread .
[Galaxy S II Android Development] lavemetoo:
I agree. Also you can see in the "About Phone": CyanogenMod-Version: SB4

And I saw te same things and behaviour in JellyBam 8.2 which I tried yesterday.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] DJBhardwaj:
Lockscreen is a reported issue. Will be fixed very soon.

Fast charge is kernel based. If you change the kernel, make sure to flash one that supports fast charging.

The base has now been changed :good:

Once again, please make a clean install while flashing SB4. Its completely re-based, so updating will create weird bugs :cool:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] DJBhardwaj:
Please do not confuse yourself with this. The word "base" makes a lot of difference when it comes to development. Here we are not opening the zips and dragging stuff. The base here respectively refers to the source heads taken from a specific project.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] diddly3000:
What does sb mean? Curious :P

---------- Post added at 09:44 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:22 AM ----------

When I restored account it didn't auto download my apps :( have to search one at a time.

Also is there a kill switch for halo?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] DJBhardwaj:
SB=Stable Build

No permanent kill switch to disable it, not yet. Simply double tap and drag it to the bin ;)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] diddly3000:
Thanks really nice job so far. Prefer cm10.1 tiles setup easier to move around :P

Absolutely love the settings transition animation too that's awesome first time I seen that also the tabbed settings is nice. Great work.

Ps. I wish more devs add there changelog as first thing you see upon boot. Great to see :)
[Galaxy S II Android Development] DJBhardwaj:
I too personally prefer the CM tiles setup.

Credits to [MENTION=4567772]htchoi5609[/MENTION] & [MENTION=2351386]woorim98[/MENTION] for the Settings and transitions :good:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] fradbari:
wonderful rom :D

i don't like only 2 things, while scrolling the rows get bigger and do not remain the same size on scrolling; even is a aosp rom, doesn't support game 3d like springfiled, beach buggy, most wanted
[Galaxy S II Android Development] diddly3000:
[MENTION=5214797]fradbari[/MENTION] you can disable animation in settings under interface I think.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] lavemetoo:
Settings - System - Interface - List View --> OFF

BTW: Use the discussion thread for these things, because it is not ROM relevat I think
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Redscorpian:
What's wrong with the download link for the latest build? Doesn't seem to be working - been trying to download it for a couple of days now.
[Galaxy S II Android Development] DJBhardwaj:
Major link has been set to our server and mirrors are now set to goo.im

Check out the first post for downloads or click here!
[Galaxy S II Android Development] duanelgh:
This ROM is awesome ! :D thanks dev :D
[Galaxy S II Android Development] youngblood68:
where do I find the list view animation ? please
[Galaxy S II Android Development] pablo0407:
Any news of an update comming of this rom?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] Gsawler:
This ROM is awesome, my only question is, can I use the Siyah Kernel with this ROM?
[Galaxy S II Android Development] DJBhardwaj:
Settings > System > Interface > ListView Animation

A long list of changes are coming. :good:
[Galaxy S II Android Development] lavemetoo:
please use discussion threat for these questions. If not, we don't need 2 threads
[Galaxy S II Android Development] youngblood68:
I cant see in settings , system? ah this is maybe not on N7100 ?