yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] daniil1410:
I use Android Revolution HD 10 with its stock kernel. My phone is very laggy. I tries many Roms like Xylon Cm10.1 and the stock and the phone begins to lag after 1-2 weeks. Now I have 5gb free space.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] neob.abragil:
I suppose you should try a custom kernel to overcome it... This kinda lags are usually improved with 'speedy' kernels:good:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] daniil1410:
I'd used faux123, air, ak kernels and it all the same. Could you tell me the perfect combo of ROM and kernel and over clock so I will have no lag, please?
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] neob.abragil:
though nothing could be called 'perfect' combo, IMO u can try AOSPA or Vanir ROM with AK/Trinity/LeanKernel... these combo never failed me
[HTC Sensation] Profondo_Rosso:
I can't access any music from within my phone, and when I hook it via usb to my pc, I get the internal drive mounted, but my 'sd card' is mounting as a cd drive. I have no idea how this happened, but I suspect somewhere in there lies my issues with the failure of music player to find any of the songs I load.

Any help would be appreciated.
[HTC Sensation] sy224048:
Are you using sultan kernel
[HTC Sensation] Sultanxda:
Try a different computer.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] Jrank2013:
Is this good battery life
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] KorGuy123:
Battery life is based on individual handsets and people. You are getting average for moderate use. Some people will get better some worse. If you are happy with that than yes its good battery life.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] y0yerrj0sh:
+1 it depends on your usage and what you mainly do with your phone.
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] xxsender:
I will fly to US in two weeks, and I want to know where I can buy the nexus 7 32g 3g. There is google store or something like this? Or I must order in the internet? And someone know if they (google) in the in stock?

And final Q , how much it's need to cost. In the play store it's cost 300$ it's the right price? Sorry for my bad English.
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kieso:
I don't know about the 3g model for sure but wal-mart has the 32 gig models. Best buy would probably be a good place to look for the 3g model
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] xxsender:
but in the same price? And 32good without 3g it's still good
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] 95Z28:
Wal-mart, office supply stores and game stores usually carry the 32GB WiFi version. Best buy doesn't sell the nexus 7 in store, and I've never seen the 3g model in any store, though I haven't looked in about a month so that may have changed.

And yes, everywhere I've seen them they've been the same price as on Google play, $250 for the 32GB WiFi.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] pwner5889:
Alrighty, been having this problem all night last night. How can I get this fixed? I got everything done up until "Prepare the device-specific code". Followed the instructions on here.http://wiki.cyanogenmod.org/w/Build_for_hercules

aaron@aaron-dev:~/android/system/build$ breakfast hercules
build/core/product_config.mk:189: *** _nic.PRODUCTS.[[device/*/hercules/cm.mk]]: "device/*/hercules/cm.mk" does not exist. Stop.
Device hercules not found. Attempting to retrieve device repository from CyanogenMod Github (http://github.com/CyanogenMod).
Found repository: android_device_samsung_hercules
CyanogenMod/android_device_samsung_hercules already exists
Syncing repository to retrieve project.
error: project device/samsung/hercules not found
Repository synced!
Looking for dependencies
Dependencies file not found, bailing out.
Done
build/core/product_config.mk:189: *** _nic.PRODUCTS.[[device/*/hercules/cm.mk]]: "device/*/hercules/cm.mk" does not exist. Stop.

** Don't have a product spec for: 'cm_hercules'
** Do you have the right repo manifest?
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] spirodave:
Did you figure this out yet?

I havent had this problem till now .. it is driving me crazy to...Let me know if you figured it out
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] MickyLuv:
To customize (edit) the Mini-App Bar to hold user defined icons and links is not directly possible according to this linked thread.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1867954&highlight=customize+mini+apps&nocache=1

It was said in the above thread that items on the mini-app bar can only be added to from the range of items in the Edit> Multi-Window and that this range of available items is pre-defined by Samsung.

Strangely though, one item available to add to the mini-apps bar from the Multi-Window is the icon of an app I only recently installed from the PlayStore. This app icon is that of Thinking Rock's "Getting Things Done" (GTD).

Unfortunately this GTD app isn't one that I want to have available on the mini-app bar. But, if this app icon found it's way onto the list, why not the GMail icon and the Evernote icon, which are missing ones that I do want on there?:confused:
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] maccra:
You can only add apps to the mini-apps bar which are multi-window capable. GTD must have added this capability to the app. However if you read the threads in the forum about multi-window apps you can either compile them yourself or download a few which other forum members have modified. Alternatively you can use the multi-window app on the play store to make nearly any app multi-window capable, however it only works on JB 4.1. 2. Once they are multi-window capable you can add them to the mini-apps bar.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] MickyLuv:
Great reply! Thanks very much.
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dobrun.franjo:
Helllo everybody

i wwant to know if 720p camera mod works on last update of Android 4.2.2!

tnx
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] Craniotomy:
How do i reset the flash bar apps? Clear cache? Data?

POWERED by FROSTY!
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] Craniotomy:
Nevermind i found out how to. Please delete thread.

POWERED by FROSTY!
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] cleomane:
Hallo,

can you plaese submit your solution. I want to reset my settings for multiwindow.

Thx
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] Craniotomy:
Go to app manager, look for "com.sec.android.app.flashbarservices" and clear data and cache then restart.

POWERED by FROSTY!
[Sony Xperia P, U, Sola, Go] jass8669:
I am looking for links to download world generic stock gingerbread(preferably 6.0.B.3.184) for my Xperia U. Also if anyone can help provide links for Custom ICS ROM to be flashed on unrooted Xperia U ( i dont want to unlock bootloader right now :D ) . I stay at India so if Indian Stock and Custom ROM's are available those will be appreciated. :)
[Galaxy S III General] Netman_:
Sad news...

http://www.sammobile.com/2013/02/23...xynos-inside-new-galaxy-s-iv-with-bootscreen/
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
Sad news? This is great news if it's true!
[Galaxy S III General] harise100:
AW: BB AMOLED and Exynos :(

No Exynos isn't that bad.

No AMOLED would be disappointing.

SD card, removable battery and a menu key makes it still top on my list.

Sent from my GT I9300
[Galaxy S III General] Glebun:
So no octa - core discussed earlier? shame
[Galaxy S III General] Meemo23:
Why do you even need 6 cores. Currently no app is using 4 cores anyway. It is a waste of time and money to have 6 core processor on a phone..
[Galaxy S III General] Netman_:
No octa - disappointing because no power saving

But if it was supposed to be Eynos Quad A15 - dont care, Snapdragon is good too ;)

Exynos octa is 4xA15 + ultra power saving 4xA7
[Galaxy S III General] delsus:
Exynos 5 Octa uses I think it was 4 low power cores and 4 high speed cores, so it's not a battery drain for low end tasks. (Octa = 8)

I will wait for official word on this, I can't see Samsung announcing the Octa this year, then not using it, it gives competitors a chance to trump it.

If they do use the snapdragon 600 it will be good because whist yes the Exynos is a good processor Samsung will not release decent documentation for it, so developers have a hard time getting AOSP roms working efficiantly, the Snapdragon range is completely open source so roms will work a lot better, and be easier to port. Exynos has already made developers leave Samsung devices.
[Galaxy S III General] samydroid:
Or may be, just like S3, the Snapdragon will be for LTE and Exynos for non-LTE S4s?
[Galaxy S III General] yahyoh:
#fake #fail
[Galaxy S III General] delsus:
Possibly but less likely with them using Exynos in the i9305 showing they can make it work (im not too sure the exact reason for not using Exynos in the US variants)
[Galaxy S III General] endrit9:
Sv: BB AMOLED and Exynos :(

Makes me wanna sell my S3...
[Galaxy S III General] yahyoh:
WOW GS4 with Amoled plus @1080p with Exynos Octa and 3GB of ram with 128GB memory :p

:D:D :cool:

LMAO
[Galaxy S III General] Indiwiz:
doubt that, since they got LTE and exynos working together finally. but the snapdragon seems like a give and take situation. that octa looks like it'll be an amazing processor, but if it's a snapdragon then we can finally get AOSP working fine.

as for the LCD, that's gonna be a personal preference for everyone. I wouldn't mind either, but I'd miss the blacks on the LED. the color punch is really nothing, I set my display to natural.

but really, do we even need the octa now? these phones we have now are over powered. I run my note ii at 1ghz with 1 core enabled and notice no differences in day to day use (except video chatting, that requires at least two cores lol) . point is, these quad cores (by today's standards) are just too much, and kinda gimmicky. I don't think we'll need to see the octa for a good year or two.
[Galaxy S III General] delsus:
Samsung have announced the Octa now, it won't be long before other chip manufacturers try to beat it, then Samsung's great idea will be old tech before it comes out. They have no choice but to put it in something if they want to make any use of it.
[Galaxy S III General] bala_gamer:
Btw we will get more details from Samsung on mwc starting tomorrow. Ill believe this only if it comes from Samsung. Whatever the processor or screen it has already been decided and s4 shoukd be in mass production right now.

《posted from s3》
[Galaxy S III General] Firaristt:
I think that's nt true. Because making a SS on PS and open up that image on a phone and taking a photo in bad light conditions isn't too hard.

Actually, I think that phone is Xperia Z or LG Optimus and photo taken with a S3...

Next Galaxy S device(international version) will have Exynos Octa(5440 or 5410) or Dual(5250) with 5" FULL HD Super AMOLED Display. Why Samsung use another solution? I don't know any logical reason. Warming? Power consumption? Software based reasons? I don't think so. This is my two cents.

On the other hand, I think(I know, I used a lot -I Think-s)next Galaxy S device will have Exynos Octa, 2GB of ram, Mali T604 or T658 GPU, better camera lens(S3's sensor is good but lens is a bit deficient.), 2600mAh battery and also more durable chasis and screen. On software, Samsung will do wonders...

Edit: If I had gramatical mistakes, I want to say I'm sorry for that. Because Eng. is my 3rd language.
[Galaxy S III General] ch0ka:
You obviously seem to have very little knowledge concerning technical product design. If it' physically impossible at the moment to manage the heating problems in this case, then in fact THIS IS a reason to kick the Octa processor for a Snapdragon...

|| Typed with my S3 or my Note 10.1 ||
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
I for one welcome Qualcomm in the international Samsung phones. Makes for a great if not superb aosp experience, doesn't it? Or am I being too naive?
[Galaxy S III General] yahyoh:
sorry u r Wrong , because snapdragon s4 pro overheat and throttle like hell and probably S600 will overheat even more :eek:
[Galaxy S III General] Mikulec:
well lets hope, but its Ssung, u never know what they come up with.
[Galaxy S III General] setspeed:
No AMOLED = I'll wait and see if the Moto X phone is any good or not. My S3 can last a bit longer.
[Galaxy S III General] KMino:
Damn no SAMOLED, hate backlights. So they couldn't make enough for the launch I guess.

Bet they release a second version of the SGS4! or they closing the SAMOLED factory and abandoning the tech, very doubtful.

Me thinks Apple is also in the rumour mill, with cash in hand for bad press of any form... I'll wait and see ;)
[Galaxy S III General] deom2i:
Guys,

I was so positive with Octa core and T678 GPU even if S4 would dish out the Amoled i could sit outside the sam shop as Apple guys waiting to buy the phone for its CPU,GPU.:angel:

With this news, no octa, no T-series and no Amoled :(....i guess im just gonna look for other phone unless they offer something different from others.

I dont know if its a good move but i prefer Sam to Lead the market again and not to be par with HTC.:fingers-crossed:

This year might be the year for Sony and HTC if Sam is not keen!! :eek:
[Galaxy S III General] Toss3:
Considering that the Octa uses almost 5W when maxed out, I think it will be a good thing for everyone if they went with the Snapdragon. Besides I think the 600 is going to be really great for developers(especially for CM), as most phones in 2013 are going to be using them. :good: The Snapdragon is also supposed to be 40% faster than the previous S4 Pro, so that means that it'll be pretty much on par with a fully fledged A15, while consuming less W.
[Galaxy S III General] gaspernemec:
First of all: my past experience with samsung flagship is, to just wait that phone gets announced and than "believe" specs. As for snapdragon, yeah it will have amazing aosp support, but because i bought samsung i am not looking for "superior aosp experience" but for touchwizz, if i wanted aosp, i would have bought nexus.....whatever, that doesnt bother me as half as DAC, dont we all know that snapdragons dac cannot even touch wolfson in sound quality? personally i dont care about aosp experience, as long as my device is ultimate sound "machine"....as about screen...i dont really know....it was reported that they started mass production of full hd amoled panels....i would kind of miss oversaturated colors and black, but still i would be able to live with good lcd...

anyway i just hope they wont make such a scenario in which they release S4 with snapdragon and lcd and than after 3 months another variant with exynos and amoled, it would be such a letdown.....
[Galaxy S III General] st3chn0:
What's on everyones mind is...How can you tell if it is actually real from a boot screen

2nd he has one device how can be prove other storage options?
[Galaxy S III General] mkendra:
So dissapointed. Again this plastic piece of s*it phone and without the exynos and the screen. Bye-Bye Samsung and Hello HTC
[Galaxy S III General] robogo1982:
I don't think this is anything more than a rumour. Samsung has invested billions in AMOLED and Exynos to be giving them up now.

A load of croc :D
[Galaxy S III General] Ausboy 2011:
Yeah I call bs... as if sammy wouldnt use its own exynos and amoled. Time will tell guys
[Galaxy S III General] kkevinloren2006:
samsung announced that want to sell 100million galaxy s4!!. but with this screen i dont think so. i think ita just a rumor and hopefully we see amoled and exynos:thumbup:
[Galaxy S III General] KMino:
I think XDA should get into Betting!

$100 on it not being Snapdragon please :D the post above hit me.. Sound quality is very important, almost forgot about that... Wonder how Sony is at it ummm
[Galaxy S III General] LenAsh:
99% of smartphone buyers haven't a clue what screen technology their phone has, or care.

Irrespective, they'll sell like mad.
[Galaxy S III General] ballsofsteel:
Precisely. They only really care if the display looks good or not, and not the underlying technology that powers it.
[Galaxy S III General] AndreiLux:
The Snapdragons are nowhere even near A15 performance, maybe the S800 but that's still away.

Compare with Tegra 4:

The Octa would be only 100MHz lower than the T4. Still regardless, you can compare that to the S600 scores, at least on the CPU side.

5W at load would be good. The 4210 peaked at 3.5W without the GPU, it was a hot phone, but it was usable. We're probably seeing higher peak dissipation than that. Average consumption would be fantastic due to the A7's though.

Anyway we'll see.

On one hand we have Samsung doing their PR release of the Octa and touting their 4.99" screen behind the scenes, and ARM employees basically sure of themselves confirming that it'll ship this spring, but that was a few months ago. OLED association actually confirmed the S4 having that screen back in November but none of the news sites caught that.

On the other hand we have sensible reasons, and supposedly leaked and credible benchmarks pretty much confirming the S600, plus several other reports.

In my opinion it's not a Galaxy S phone anymore and they should call it something else. I wouldn't release it like that.

The uninformed user prefers the colourful and deeper blacks of AMOLED displays, don't think that many people beyond enthusiasts really care that much for "accurate" colours. An S-Stripe display as on the Note 2 has no disadvantages over any LCD.
[Galaxy S III General] delsus:
There's no such thing as a credible benchmark, they can be faked easily, news sites just find apparent prototype phones in the databases for benchmarks with no name on them. It could have been posted by Bob down the road with a modified build.prop and news sites would cover it.
[Galaxy S III General] AndreiLux:
Bob down the road did an extremely good job in faking OpenGL extensions and Qualcomm driver versions. :rolleyes:
[Galaxy S III General] yahyoh:
:eek::eek::eek:

[YOUTUBE]asQUdRKYVrQ[/YOUTUBE]
[Galaxy S III General] yahyoh:
here we go first Snapdragon S800 sunspider test O_o

thats joke :D
[Galaxy S III General] gaspernemec:
Lool....seriously i dont see reason samsung would use snapdragon 600...when they have tegra 4 (if they cannot use exynos)
[Galaxy S III General] victorinoxs:
Fingers crossed that they get rid of AMOLED....why do people like AMOLED so much? It ages and deteriorates over time causing burn-in marks; it drains 3X more power than modern LCD when displaying lighter colors; it's color reproduction is never accurate; the viewing angle isn't as good as that of modern LCD technologies either.....it's such an immature technology......
[Galaxy S III General] efrant:
Please continue the discussion here. Thanks.
[Galaxy S III Android Development] psndna88:
-deodexed

-zipaligned

-rooted SuperSU 1.0.5

-busybox included

-popup browser

-aosp keyboard

-apex launcher

-google play music

-Xposed framework

WIP: "wifi dhcp addressing + logcat" broken, checking out permission issues...

New enhancements in this LEAKED I9300XXUFMB3:

- Android 4.2.1 – JOP40D

- Improved Ripple effect on Lockscreen

- New Android 4.2.1 Lockscreen with widgets

- Daydream (Settings>Display)

- New Additions in Notification Center

- Notifications are more actionable

- Voice Command (Let’s you control various parts of the phone using voice commands)

Note:

1: Siyah kernel 1.8.9 is NOT compatible, i dont know about other custom kernels

2:

Screenshots:
[Galaxy S III Android Development] psndna88:
RESERVED
[Galaxy S III Android Development] and8res:
screenshots please !
[Galaxy S III Android Development] ghul21:
Odp: [ROM][STOCK][I9300][JB 4.2.1] PSN&gt;&gt; Stock I9300XXUFMB3 &lt;UPLOAD IN PROGRESS&gt;

IT is STOCK. Why u need screenshots?

Wysyłane z mojego GT-I9300 za pomocą Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S III Android Development] Bugblatter:
Because it has new stuff.

Screenies here: http://www.sammobile.com/2013/02/22...iii-android-4-2-1-jelly-bean-leaked-firmware/
[Galaxy S III Android Development] MF88:
Did anyone notice the HDR shot capability ????

its present in this firmware
[Galaxy S III Android Development] pride_kr:
Re: [ROM][STOCK][I9300][JB 4.2.1] PSN&gt;&gt; Stock I9300XXUFMB3 &lt;DISCONTINUED&gt;

It always had hdr
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] GT9001:
Hey I have a real serious problem with this ROM

[ROM][JB][4.1.2] Paranoid Android 2.99 I9001

it worked fine till I changed the display modes to Phablet,

the device rebooted and know after entering PIN there comes a message saying that Trebuchet crashed,

only way to turn off the phone is to take out the battery!

I have CWM installed but trying to start phone in recovery doesn't work:

samsung logo is shwoing then display goes black again normaly now the android thingy should be displayed but screen turn black and the samsung logo is showed again and this over and over!

how do I start CWM in recovery properly I googled but everybody says smthn different:

I don't know what to do! :(

before that ROM I had [ROM][ICS][CM9]PARANOIDANDROID Ecstacy[HYBRID] and everything was fine
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Melbye:
Hi folks

I have the problem, that when i tried to install Jellybam on my phone, it suddently went black, and now it wont start at all.

It will not react on home+lock+volume up/down either.

What can the problem be, and is there any solution to this problem at all?

Sincerely

Pumba Melbye
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] fxrb:
Are you sure the battery is charged? Do you see the charging animation when you plug in the charger?
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Melbye:
answer

Yes, it was fully charged, and it has also been connected to the charger for the last 8 hours now, and we tested it with my friends battery, so that is not the prob. :)
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tomtro74:
Do You see charging animation when You plug in Your charger ?

If not then.... well, You are hardbricked.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Melbye:
answer

well, i don't see anything no matter what i do at all, so i hope you are right. In that case, what should i do to save it?
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] gastonw:
Before you flashed jellybam, were you on 4.0.4 stock?

Sent from the little guy
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Melbye:
answer

Yes, i had 4.0.4 and heard a friend telling that his i9100 had been upgraded to jellybam, and we tried to do the same to mine, but when it came to the installation of the new OS, it went all black and hasn't reacted since.

ps. when in charger, the phone is getting warm in the top.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] gastonw:
Yes, I know.

You bricked it, read about brick bug.

And I gotta post my fav 4.0.4 meme...

Sent from the little guy
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Melbye:
answer

alright, how to fix it? :)
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] gastonw:
Warranty? Tell them you did a factory reset and never came back (which is the truth, don't say anything about jellybam tho).

No warranty? mobo replacement.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Melbye:
answer

nothing else to do?
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] gastonw:
Nope.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tomtro74:
The only way to fix it is to replace main board in Your phone. I hope it is still under warranty otherwise it's gonna be rather expensive. Tell them it happened when You did factory reset and

never

mention rooting or flashing anything.
[Thunderbolt Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dgross1123:
Need a little help ..I have thunderbolt flashed to cricket cant get my mms to continue workin ..I've done all the steps to make it work and it does for a little bit then it stops ...in my build prop ...ro.net.apnwhitelist ... Mms/supl/admin...should I add. Cricket in tht list
[General Questions and Answers] khalid0099:
Why my account still not active. I can't submit or reply in development foum for sgs3?
[General Questions and Answers] devwithzachary:
Because you need ten posts to post in development forums a quick search should have told you this
[General Questions and Answers] khalid0099:
Thanks. But do u mean any 10 post even in general forum ?
[General Questions and Answers] ekadarma:
Yup. We have to post 10 post in any forum before can pos in development forum
[General Questions and Answers] khalid0099:
My post count is 8 I think its need 2 more