yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[HTC One S] havikx:
OK guys. I'm on one of last months cm10 builds. Hboot 1.06. I've tried a bunch of radios with the cm radio installer. Edited my build prop values. I cant seem to break 6-8mbs. Was getting insane speeds on trickdroid.

Any input is appreciated.
[General Questions and Answers] Patrick34:
I just bought a new Nook HD over the weekend and used the information from this post;

Nook HD+ CM10 development (sdcard) updated 2/12, to build a bootable sdcard to run CM10 without touching the Nook OS on the internal memory. After figuring out how to fix the Google Play store, I was off and running.

Everything works great so far, except anything using the magnetic sensor, which I cannot confirm is even in this thing.

On installing any apps that require the use of a magnetic sensor, I found, that none of them work. Smart Protractor was the only one to actually, eventually, error out and tell me that there was a magnetic sensor error. It suggested it was either missing or just not working.

The screen flips, I have a level bubble app that works just fine, but nothing for compass, protractor, avionics gauges (altimeter, horizon, etc.).

I've just been installing any apps to see if any features do not work. The obvious thing to do would be to use this app in the Nook OS, but the last time I booted as a Nook, my SDBOOT stopped working and I had to start all over. I don't want to start over again.

My questions is: is this a bug/missing feature in CM10, or does the Nook HD simply not have this sensor?
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] chalkytannins:
The Chinese bootloader won't let me flash a french or indian firmware through Odin PC, and the current solution seems to be using Mobile Odin.

I was able to get Mobile Odin installed, but when I try and flash the firmware, on reboot it just hangs at the blue mobileOdin logo.

At this point, I have to restart the device into download mode, and flash back over the stock CHN firmware.

I tried using mobile Odin again with the CHN firmware I'm able to flash over through Odin PC, and I run into the same problem as before; the device hangs at the blue mobileOdin logo.

There seem to be others out there having this freezing issue with mobileOdin, but I cannot find a solution.

Is there anything else I can try other than mobileOdin to flash my Chinese Note 2?

Thanks
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] note2grey:
Try flash by stock recovery?

But is that even possible? Lol
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] myhelloworld:
I have a Chinese N7100, after rooted and installed HK rom, now it stucks on the sumsung logo. tried to flash the stock recovery.img (extracted from stock rom), won't get into recovery mode.
[Galaxy Note II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mikasjoman:
Well lets say like this, I REALLY hope you made a backup of your EFS image before you flash with Odin like they recommend everywhere (damn I feel stupid right now, since I have been flashing for years). I just bricked my N7100 Chinese version (no EFS = no phone functionality), because I tried to update the phone with Odin. I didn't know that the phone was hacked (almost all Chinese N7100 are if they are bought second hand), and trying to upgrade it to Official 4.3 was probably the most stupid thing I have ever done. Trying to put a indian official rom on a Chinese phone will definitely NOT work, you should put one with CHN in the file name.

What I should have done, was to just change the hacked ROM to any other un-official ROM out there. Instead using Odin, I just bricked it forever. Feels crazy, but using cwmrecovery to flash any other popular ROM would have kept my phone working. It is now offically a Phablet with Wifi only since my EFS image is broken.

Maybe you can see if you EFS image is still OK with ADB:

adb shell
cd /efs
ls

to see if it is still intact and that there are file sin that folder. Mine is just empty.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] mthomas0513:
Which one is the better ROM???
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] corwest:
Try em and you tell me.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] mettleh3d:
Yes!! Good ROM!!!!
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] mthomas0513:
Which one???
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] joytofender:
You have to try both and decide by yourself. The reason for different ROMS is not that one is better than the other. It's a matter of which one works for you and your phone. You will not get a definitively answer here. Don't be affraid and try them.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] Xeroday:
I used to be a big CM fan, but once I started using AOKP, I ditched CM (even thought it still has a place in my heart)
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] mthomas0513:
I did a clean flash wiped phone and all cache and got the boot animation screen for a very long time. Couldn't wait as I am at work so I went back to Mr_1... Any advice?
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] ayyeeallen:
The CM has a couple of things aokp doesn't have an vise-versa. Cm10.1 still has the old status bar toggles with quick settings and aokp doesn't. Cm10.1 also has the slider shortcuts as well
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] anacronismo:
AOKP is less wonky IMO.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] bonetweeter122:
AOKP can disable wake on charge.. YEAH!
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-T989] Androidluv:
I just think it's absolutely fantastic that we have all these choices of roms. It could also be considered a curse as I'm always waiting for the newest rom or latest update.....gaaaahhhhhhhh........I'm addicted!!!!!! :D
[Galaxy Ace II General] Rikxzdjz:
Hi guys just wanna share my Antutu score , here it is

Im running Leaked JB OS and CPU governor is Ondemand and Deadline

No tweak installed..

How about yours ? :D
[Galaxy Ace II General] arroyo:
Not the best score, but one of my best. 6500 is hard to reach on Kyrillos v5, but possible.

6452 - Gingerbread, Kyrillos V4, Ondemand/Deadline, no other optimizations beside Kyrillos ones

Can you post next scores with partial results?
[Galaxy Ace II General] Rikxzdjz:
good:good:
[Galaxy Ace II General] loof13:
What is the best governor and io for good performance?
[Galaxy Ace II General] xXfreshXx:
AW: Antutu benchmark score

So GB gets better scores than JB so far?

I'll stay on GB, I think...
[Galaxy Ace II General] asdfzz:
R: Antutu benchmark score

Lol...you guys trust so much benchmark ;)
[Galaxy Ace II General] veaceslav:
Your read or write speed on SD card is unreal. You can't reach 131MB/s with micro-SD card.
[Galaxy Ace II General] veaceslav:
Here is mine. No sd card score even if sd card is installed and work correcly.

Stock rooted rom with some apps deleted. Governor ondemand, scheduler cfq.

Sent from my GT-I8160
[Galaxy Ace II General] asdfzz:
R: Antutu benchmark score

Mine

JB no root
[Galaxy Ace II General] xXfreshXx:
AW: Antutu benchmark score

So tell me why JB has lower score??
[Galaxy Ace II General] mojito0:
Because it's a LEAK. Why do you think people install JB instead of GB because it's poor in performance? Nope project butter exists to make it faster and better in performance..if you want 7000 at benchmark wait for the official release of jb.
[Galaxy Ace II General] forbidden8:
... or OC kernel.
[Galaxy Ace II General] Rikxzdjz:
Latest score on Leak JellyBean:thumbup::thumbup:
[Galaxy Ace II General] Tommykeu7:
Good Score for JB Leak

Good Score for JB leak, the score can increase if we have custom kernel with more Governor and IO option like HD kernel, because custom kernel can increase cpu performance and read/write sd card score... still waiting for kyrillos JB Rom and HD kernel JB... i hope tomorrow dream will come true for our phone ...
[Galaxy Ace II General] michal89chz:
6600 antutu and 2900 quadrant on Jelly Bean ,performance/deadline 800/800 ,all not necesary app are moved out with titanium backup and no animations in phone.
[Galaxy Ace II General] arroyo:
@michal89chz

Post screen with this 6600 points please .... or it did not happen.
[Galaxy Ace II General] slade9220:
R: Antutu benchmark score

jb deodex (with simlinks)

Deadline/ondemand

Inviato dal mio GT-I8160 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy Ace II General] michal89chz:
Odp: Antutu benchmark score

I dont have right now JB on my phone so i cant send score in antutu on it but I have on my hdd screnshot from quadrant on XXMB4 and d-kernel v2:

Sent from Ace 2
[Galaxy Ace II General] arroyo:
@michal89chz

I do not think those results are from i8160. Your Pam: (Mem) and 2D scores are way above what i8160 can offer. Can you send validation of this score?

If I may ask ... I would like to see those scores also.
[Galaxy Ace II General] michal89chz:
Odp: Antutu benchmark score

I cant give you my score from antutu because I dont have JB right now...That score from quadrant is real.Ace 2 can get on JB up to 3000 in quadrant on JB.That photo from quadrant is on: fast and lite v7b, d-kernel v2, performance/vr, 800mhz/800mhz, sd card 10 class (swap) , nova launcher , all setings in phone dev section is to get performace ,and this is all.

If you want to compare phones use RD 3D benchmark. On Ace 2 GB allways is 30fps average score and on Ace 2 JB allways more then 42fps average.That one is good benchmark.

Sent from Ace 2 :)
[Galaxy Ace II General] judas1977:
Idk, just staying on stock for a while...
[Galaxy Ace II General] ip3000:
Stock? :eek: you use a modified kernel a think :rolleyes:
[Galaxy Ace II General] judas1977:
Yes, that's OCelot :)
[Galaxy Ace II General] ip3000:
can you share it? :D
[Galaxy Ace II General] judas1977:
No, it's not good enough...
[Galaxy Ace II General] forbidden8:
Is it will be?
[Galaxy Ace II General] judas1977:
How should i know? :eek:
[Galaxy Ace II General] 10BIT:
i just want to share a little thing :D
[Galaxy Ace II General] dirtyl0lharry:
A SGS2 customized can give more than 60.

Enviado desde mi U9200
[Galaxy Ace II General] 10BIT:
well,i just wanna show that ace 2 can surpass stock SGS2
[Galaxy Ace II General] tofueatsbread:
Customized ace 2?
[Galaxy Ace II General] dirtyl0lharry:
SGS2

Dual1.2@

1GB

Mali400MP4

SGA2

Dual 0.8@

768MB

Mali400MP1

Anyway the SGS2 was meant to beat the iphone 4/4s so samsung took care off it as its best phone on that times.

The sgs2 was the best android phone on its days...

Enviado desde mi GT-I8160
[Galaxy Ace II General] 10BIT:
Thats what I mean.....
[Galaxy Ace II General] alijoregon:
Are you using stock rom?? :eek:

Enviado desde mi GT-I8160 mediante Tapatalk
[Galaxy Ace II General] judas1977:
@up

No, but that score was from stock Rom

Wysłane z mojego GT-I8160 przy użyciu Tapatalka
[Galaxy Ace II General] ChronoMonochrome:
ROM: CM 11 by TeamCanjica

CPU 200-1230 MHz, GPU 700 MHz static

Tweaks: [MENTION=5840412]ace2nutzer[/MENTION] recommendation for CPU UV
[Galaxy Ace II General] ChronoMonochrome:
With CPU 200-1150 and GPU 400-680 MHz:

it's slightly lower than the previous result, but a few more stable.
[Galaxy Ace II General] Oceandar:
Wow those are fantastic and scary Antutu's score. Are they save in the long run?
[Galaxy Ace II General] xo.en:
Hello.

Modded liquidsmooth, 4.3.x, no gpu oc(kernel seems to not have it), ondemand/sioplus, gpu -37.5mV, cpu -50.mV in both tests(disputable, if uV works with this kernel too ;/). I REALLY do not need KK roms. Ace2 ended with 4.3.x, where almost everything could work for days without problem, imho.

sshots:

...800mhz..........1.2ghz..almost idle.......screen
[Galaxy Ace II General] xo.en:
funny progress, still 4.3.x, still zero gpu oc, remember(i still have no kernel for 4.3.x with working gpu oc):

800mhz....1.2 ghz
[Galaxy Ace II General] caglaryk:
Ooo

Good score
[Galaxy Ace II General] Asus-Tek:
Stock rom? kernel?
[Galaxy Ace II General] caglaryk:
R:

Rom :kyrillos v9

Kernel chrono_kernel_r1.1_4.1.2_cwm.zip
[Galaxy Ace II General] avithohol:
New hights :p (Chrono kernel + 710 mhz gpu OC) :
[Galaxy Ace II General] fluffi444:
FSync Dynamic? :confused: :D
[Galaxy Ace II General] avithohol:
Yes + Interactive gov. and NOOP sched.
[Galaxy Ace II General] fluffi444:
Yeb - without FSync this high score would never be possible...
[Galaxy Ace II General] mkel91:
or buy a new phone, we'll never have 7000 like score; almost we can reach the same we had with a custom kernel like ex kernel or HD kernel.

And for me bench are the most unnecessary apps created for android; they tell nothing, only numbers, nothing to taste, I've seen many phone with low score faster than phones with high score..
[Galaxy Ace II General] michal89chz:
Odp: Antutu benchmark score

After OC to 1200mhz (1Ghz is normal for nova thore u8500 so I think we can go up to minimum 1200mhz when/if we get OC kernel) we can get more then 7000 in antutu and more then 3000 in quadrant.For sure.

Sent from Ace 2 :)
[Galaxy Ace II General] mkel91:
with OC you will do the same score, maybe more 200 point, because is not only cpu to perform that score; you can OC the cpu, but don't forget that DRAM freq will be the same, like the nand speed; our memory is slowest than S advance or S2 in terms of frequency, so will be really difficult to reach that cpu frequency. You all think CPU works alone, but Cpu works with RAM, GPU, I/O bus and other, and If one o more of these is slow, you can't reach high performance, the system will be instable e will reboot a lot..
[Galaxy Ace II General] michal89chz:
Odp: Antutu benchmark score

I understand your point but better is to have higher freq. My old LWW have on stock 1ghz and after OC to 1,8ghz is like another better phone so:

higher freq. = better performance .Mayby 10% mayby 50% but beter.
[Galaxy Ace II General] mkel91:
Not even, Moore's law during this year teaches the way to follow, it's better more core at low freq, that less core at high freq for some reason I could explain here; sometimes higher frequency lead to higher power compsumation, and poor performances increase; not to go so far, look at s advance or S 3 mini, they have the same CPU (i'm talking about only the cpu, not the SOC) with the same architecture (Cortex A9, dual core, with the same I/O sub-system), cloked 800 mhz (ace 2) 1.0ghz (s advance) 1.2ghz (s3 mini), between this 3 phone overall performances are exactly the same, maybe antutu is better, but as I said before, for me antutu has no meaning, but ace 2 battery lasts more than others; this could help you to understand how freq is not important to performance as other factors like architecture, I/0 sub-system, nand,ram speed and other, I'm sure OC in this phone will lead much power consuption and only marginal improvements,that they don't justify battery drain. It's what I've tried to say since we had the fist custom kernel, and people started to ask about OC. We must concentrate on other optimization and leave OC, in this architecture OC is not the way to follow..
[Galaxy Ace II General] michal89chz:
Odp: Antutu benchmark score

We cant change memory,memory timings, cores, architecture etc... so we want change this what we can so if you dont see differences beetwin 1200mhz and 800mhz mayby change in your ace freq. to 400mhz... (400mhz difference) Then you will see...Yes I know that- mayby rising clock above 800mhz is pointless because ram or I/O is to slow...mayby.

OC is not most important but beetwin 400 and 800mhz on two cores is BIG hole like beetwin 800 and 1200 mhz but I dont want to argue with you. You dont need OC? Ok ;) But I want and alot of people want it too so when we get OC you dont need to use that, your choice ;)
[Galaxy Ace II General] TheWolf59:
My benchmark: Ace II with OC at 1200Mhz, Gingerbread rooted, Antutu CPU Master at 1200MHz mini scalling performance.

Battery saver pro lvl1.
[Galaxy Ace II General] mkel91:
it's really low; I had 6300 with ex kernel @800mhz

and don't forget it's a fake OC, we don't have OC on ace 2, it's only 800mhz with 1200mhz label
[Galaxy Ace II General] TheWolf59:
I suspected the OC was fake :D but it seems to me a "little" change, not perforce visible
[Galaxy Ace II General] mkel91:
R: Antutu benchmark score

At the beginning someone realeased a kernel with fake OC, a really older kernel now, and slow..

Powered by Galaxy Ace II official 4.1.2
[Galaxy Ace II General] TheWolf59:
I take the third file here: http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=27696948&postcount=47 :confused:

This is the fake ? If yes can you give me the CORRECT file :D ?
[Galaxy Ace II General] mkel91:
I suggest you to use this custom kernel:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1962100

or this stock kernel+CMW :

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2072872
[Galaxy Ace II General] TheWolf59:
Thanks :) this custom kernel can OC more than 800Mhz ?
[Galaxy Ace II General] mkel91:
as we said before, there is no OC now for this phone, and for all the phone that have the same CPU still now..
[Galaxy Ace II General] TheWolf59:
Oh ok ^^ thanks you for kernel, i put in now
[Galaxy Ace II General] Rasheed96:
It's this a real oc ?

---------- Post added at 04:01 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:53 PM ----------

There is oc kernel called U kernel for the Xperia U which has the same Cpu as ace 2.. and I think it should work.
[Galaxy Ace II General] mkel91:
It is another fake OC kernel, there is now way no OC this SOC now! we are tired to say this, we need documentation about our SOC that we don't have..

Ask HD,antsm,Kyrillos,and many other, and you'll receive the same answer..
[Galaxy Ace II General] TheWolf59:
I compared the "fake" oc kernel and ex kernel v7, strangely the fake kernel is less slow than v7 ^^'
[Galaxy Ace II General] forbidden8:
I beat my best score in Quadrant...

... new official MC8 firmware with deleted bloatware apps.
[Galaxy Ace II General] Rikxzdjz:
2789 ? Whoa very low .. ? Are u sure thats the official JB ?
[Galaxy Ace II General] brkas:
Thats quadrant, not antutu.
[Galaxy Ace II General] Rikxzdjz:
Owh sorry ;) missed that word
[Galaxy Ace II General] michal89chz:
Odp: Antutu benchmark score

This is good score but not the best for Ace 2 in Quadrant
[Galaxy Ace II General] d-beat:
My best score on MC8:confused: on kyrillos4 i get 6200+

Sent from my GT-I8160
[Galaxy Ace II General] samer menla:
i got 5993 in antutu with class 10 memory

im running stock mc8
[Galaxy Ace II General] forbidden8:
Today score, after reboot...
[Galaxy Ace II General] mojito0:
Duuude ur 3D graphics r fked up...
[Galaxy Ace II General] michal89chz:
Odp: Antutu benchmark score

Instal old version , 1.9.0 or something and you get 6500 or more...because is bug in 3d graphics test. Only one benchmark is good : RD 3d benchmark.

Allways I have on GB 30fps but on JB allways 44fps
[Galaxy Ace II General] mkel91:
R: Antutu benchmark score

Which rom/kernel?

Inviato dal mio GT-I8160 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy Ace II General] forbidden8:
On stock MC8, before install The Italian Job.
[Galaxy Ace II General] hesaps1234h:
I dont know why i get a score like this,please help me :(
[Galaxy Ace II General] xXfreshXx:
Click on "detailed score" and do a Screenshot again...

What rom, kernel?
[Galaxy Ace II General] TheWolf59:
My new score in attached picture:

I don't know some people have more than 6000 :(
[Galaxy Ace II General] michal89chz:
On GB when is bug (1.x.x.v) you can get 6600-6700

Guys!!!! You want to compare devices? Use RD 3D benchmark!
[Galaxy Ace II General] kokiss:
Its Gingerbread?
[Galaxy Ace II General] xXfreshXx:
It is gingerbread! You can see it if you look at statusbar...
[Galaxy Ace II General] hesaps1234h:
Guys im using The italian job v1.0 with stock kernel. How can you get scores above 6000 help me
[Galaxy Ace II General] Adriangbba6:
Don't trust benchmark!! Your phone performance can you taste yourself :D :thumbup:

Sorry for my bad english

Sent from my GT-I8160 running JB XXMC8 Italian Job V1.0
[Galaxy Ace II General] hesaps1234h:
it isnt very smooth actually
[Galaxy Ace II General] forbidden8:
Its very low score...
[Galaxy Ace II General] hesaps1234h:
I know but i dont know what to do
[Galaxy Ace II General] forbidden8:
Try install it again with wipe. Its not normal. I'm on Italian Job 1.0 and my score is about 5780.
[Galaxy Ace II General] xXfreshXx:
Download a CPU control tool like setcpu and check if clock is at 800mhz max and 200mhz min

Governor is your choose but not POWERSAVE!
[Galaxy Ace II General] michal89chz:
performace/vr or deadline are the best
[Galaxy Ace II General] :
Antutu (or other, I didn't try other benchamarks) benchmark can't be trusted. On S advance, I ran it and got ~6800 points, changed the governor to performance, run it again and bam, 3000.
[Galaxy Ace II General] xXfreshXx:
No performance means: running only on 800mhz.

This isn't good for battery life.

I use ondemand.
[Galaxy Ace II General] asdfzz:
I think its better post Quadrant screenshot !!
[Galaxy Ace II General] Adriangbba6:
My best score :p

Sent from my GT-I8160 running JB XXMC8 Italian Job V1.0
[Galaxy Ace II General] uchihakurtz:
How the hell did you get this score?? OC?? Or Photoshop? LOL, nice score dude.
[Galaxy Ace II General] forbidden8:
Its normal for mc8 or TIJ.

Mine:
[Galaxy Ace II General] Adriangbba6:
This is real dude :D

our phone with JellyBean must be higher than 2800 in quadrant :p

CMIIW

Sorry for my bad english
[Galaxy Ace II General] TheWolf59:
with GB it's poor with quadrant lol:
[Galaxy Ace II General] michal89chz:
Nothing special. I had before 2950 one time...

If you want to compare do it on RD 3D benhmark.
[Galaxy Ace II General] uchihakurtz:
LOL, you're right, I've never used Quadrant before. It shocked me that Ace II was able to score above Tab 2 and Atrix. Quadrant must be buggy :D
[Galaxy Ace II General] TheWolf59:
I want Jelly Bean snif :crying:
[Galaxy Ace II General] wiseman-fr:
my Antutu benchmark score

GB > JB WITHOUT WIPING DATA

Sorry no screenshot but circa 4200

GB > JB WITH WIPING DATA

GB > JB WITH WIPING DATA + THE ITALIAN JOB 1.0
[Galaxy Ace II General] michal89chz:
My new Quadrant score , Italian Job v1.0 (JB)
[Galaxy Ace II General] michal89chz:
Heh now I know why I have low scores in antutu...I cant change in test type of memory to do that test, allways is internal memory (up to 30MB/s) and I have a card up to 93MB/s

This is a reason why now I dont have 6600 :/

In older antutu version I can change it.
[Galaxy Ace II General] Rox:
how did you guys got 1k on 2D ( in quadrant ) ?

i got about 300 :S
[Galaxy Ace II General] mkel91:
Enable GPU rendering in development

Inviato dal mio GT-I8160 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy Ace II General] hesaps1234h:
Finally got over 6000 :)
[Galaxy Ace II General] michal89chz:
6000 is nothing for our phone..we can get 7k. (like on GB 6600 ) but people from company antutu always change that app to get more or les points :/

Guys...you want to compare phones? RD 3D benchmark is the best because on GB is allways 30fps and on JB 42...
[Galaxy Ace II General] maxprzemo:
my score on the Italian Job v1.0
[Galaxy Ace II General] nesimi14:
Stock rom
[Galaxy Ace II General] xXfreshXx:
Same
[Galaxy Ace II General] michal89chz:
My best Quadrant score is 2933:)

:) Why you guys use that benchmark? Try RD 3D...
[Galaxy Ace II General] breinzter:
my score is 5686

is it good??

Samsung Galaxy Ace 2 GT-I8160

Jelly Bean XXMC8 Italian Job

Check Out My Mod Pack For TheAmazingSpiderMan
[Galaxy Ace II General] Florian Bichl:
My Score running KYRILLOS V7B, D-Kernel and set cpu to 800MHz.
[Galaxy Ace II General] michal89chz:
why you are on v7b? Italian Job 1.0.0 is a lot faster in UI.
[Galaxy Ace II General] Florian Bichl:
Because i like Kyrillos v7b and haven't tried italianjob
[Galaxy Ace II General] Shadowcareful:
My antutu and quadrant score on officiel JB PXXME1 without root or any other optimations
[Galaxy Ace II General] michal89chz:
Try ;)
[Galaxy Ace II General] Rox:
there is aosp italian job, almost same look as kyrillos, few improvements.
[Galaxy Ace II General] Florian Bichl:
I'm downloading it
[Galaxy Ace II General] shine911:
Very small
[Galaxy Ace II General] mkel91:
You battery is very low.. Try with charger and full battery..

Inviato dal mio GT-I8160 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy Ace II General] playagiron:
I have Italian Job 1.0, supercharger v6, and still get only 4274 points in AnTuTu?? 800MHz. (without SD card).

Really wonder why that difference to the results posted here, any ideas what to look for that slogs it down?