yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] srpanadero:
Wow, I just so do not agree.

That issue already has a lot of input. that issue already has the attention of Cyanogen (Steve K.) himself. Cyanogen himself has assigned that issue to himself, and he says in that thread that he "Will not sleep" until it is resolved. I do not see how more votes on that particular issue will get his attention more that it has, or be helpful.

On the other hand, if you are interested in resolving the random reboot/stability issues that people are reporting, then here are some unresolved unassigned reports that need those votes: :)

https://jira.cyanogenmod.org/browse/CYAN-1082

https://jira.cyanogenmod.org/browse/CYAN-1125

https://jira.cyanogenmod.org/browse/CYAN-388

https://jira.cyanogenmod.org/browse/CYAN-545

https://jira.cyanogenmod.org/browse/CYAN-452
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] marcelomanzo:
Can we put together a list of bugs that is affecting our device?

For me:

https://jira.cyanogenmod.org/browse/CYAN-1057

https://jira.cyanogenmod.org/browse/CYAN-1125

Plus the bluetooth toggle
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] esokolov:
Thank you, I got the idea. I wonder if it can be re-enabled in the working system, by just changing some parameters? Or the code is missing?

"A new kernel" they mention, is it somehow related to recent stock JB release? Will the CM10.1 for i717 ever benefit from the stock JB resources?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jlpatte2:
So I'm not involved, but what what I can tell the main input to the change in early may was the released source for the very similar sgs2. Oddly despite always being told source will help it seems that on the contrary it had resulted in lower quality.... I guess we can hope it's just taking an extended time to integrate info from the newer i717 src release.

So for those who don't realize, the note is basically the same add the American galaxy 2 hardware just with a bigger screen. So a lot of our development comes from the bigger sgs2 community.

Anyway I'm very thankful for all the developers in both communities. They have made all these devices do much more than they were initially, even if there are some bugs.

Josh
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] khaytsus:
Except for the completely different CPU, GPU, radio, etc..

What are you talking about?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Anthony820:
I've been saying the same thing since they started using the skyrocket source. JB was a rebooting mess for months and months, and just when the CM kernel got to be pretty damn solid, they messed with it and it's last August all over again. It's sad that I no longer touch any JB ROMs because I don't want to enter a time machine of frustration.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ipprof:
I'm thinking about getting out too. It's been pretty bad. What ROM are you on?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Anthony820:
I've went back to Blackstar X. I have it underclocked down to a 1134 max and it still runs snappier than any JB on these forums. After cleaning up crap, sometimes I sit just under 400mb of free RAM, and with Greenfiy and things undervolted, I couldn't imagine getting better battery life.

JB is great and all, but imo, it really just boils down to different transition animations and, in the case of 4.2, a less convenient toggle panel. Sure dashclock would be nice, but lockscreen notifications aren't a deal breaker for me.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] srpanadero:
YMMV of course, but here, the M3 build is very stable, and so gives me a good 4.2. Anything past that is where things got flaky.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Frankenbiker:
I'm glad I'm not the only one who noticed this....

I've also been questioning why I'm still doing this..... *shrug*

-blaine

(p.s... 52 hours uptime on 5/18)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jlpatte2:
They have the same CPU, GPU and radio.

Both have msm8660 based Qualcomm chipsets, With adrino 220 GPUs.

I don't know what the radios are technically, but I know you can use the TMobile sgs2 radio firmware to get your note working on TMobile, so they almost have to be the same or super similar hw.

Josh
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] khaytsus:
Oh, the Skyrocket (i727; which wasn't that popular) or the TMobile SGS2 (SGH-T989) have similar CPU/GPUs. Not the AT&T SGS2, or International.

Anywho.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] marcelomanzo:
you are right... I will downgrade to M3...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ipprof:
I just loaded 524 and it seems smoother (too soon to tell of course). But my two apps that fail the graphics still only work with overlays repressed. So that's still a work in progress. So far no reboots, no fc. I'll update this during the day.

Reboot 1: went into perpetual reboot after trying to get BT to connect to a new source.

Reboot 2: BT toggle failed so had to intentionally reboot to fix.

Reboots 3-8: various apps froze leading to spontaneous reboots or manual to get out of the freeze

That's the first 4 hours!!!

Then, multiple screen freezes, fc, spontaneous reboots.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] D150shorty:
I second that. So far no reboots..
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] khaytsus:
You all are killing me posting "no reboots!" immediately after flashing a ROM. ;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ipprof:
DOES ANYBODY KNOW?

Next to my signal indicator it usually said H or H+ or 3G. Today it started saying, at times, DC. Does anybody know what the hell that's all about?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] srpanadero:
Dual cell hspa?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ipprof:
Yes I guess so. That leaves why...after all this time. Is it tmo's version of lte you think?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] LuckyStrike88:
I've recently encountered a problem, I generally download nightlies with cyandelta and flash with TWRP and I'm currently running 2.5 I'm currently on 5/17 and tried to flash 5/24 but when I'm in recovery and get to the step of "slide to flash ROM" it just reboots back to the TWRP screen and eventually the main menu.

I'm not trying to hijack this thread but has it happened to anyone else? Any solutions?

Thanks
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ipprof:
You might move the downloaded file to a more generic location like download or documents. Or it may be the form of the file. Is it a zip file? Any extra dots before the zip? Does it look like the others do/did? Why not just use cmupdater to download and go into recovery manually to load it via trwp?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] logocreator:
CM or AT&T JB?

I have been trying out various flavor's of JB (including Jaimie's) till AT&T's version came out. Though I was reluctant initially, when pmtr3's debloated version came out, decided to try it. I think it is a better choice available now as no random reboots, though I terribly miss most of the CM features. Still waiting to have a stable CM version. I have been a fan of CM since my days of Captivate. Hope we will have one soon.

Thanks to all the developers who invest their time and energy into projects like these.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] srpanadero:
A stable version of CM is the Monthly "M" versions. M3 is fine, only bug I'm aware of is Bluetooth toggle stops working sometimes until reboot. Doesn't affect all.

M versions are listed at get.cm and goo manager as "snapshots".

Edit: This looks like an open Bluetooth bug if those affected can post comments, votes and logs. https://jira.cyanogenmod.org/browse/CYAN-504
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ipprof:
The only one I could find by him is his Hercules Jedi Knight. Where is the JB?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] patch_Adams:
I am new to building. So, I built cm 10.1 from source for our device and all went well. And then I used some of the files from said source and built a rom from the infuse from source, again, all went well. Is there any way to know, before I flash the infuse rom, if I built it right?? I really don't want to brick my device when I flash the zip. Thanks.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] patch_Adams:
Nevermind. I flashed it, and so far so good. What I built is something not available, at the moment, for the Note; so, I may post the rom here for all to enjoy! Awaiting permissions from the dev.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Jmelendez1:
Cool beans:thumbup:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] esokolov:
Self-bump!

Guys, anyone knows? Will 4.1.2 stock firmware (and source code) eventually help to resolve 4.2.2 CM10.1 stability issues, or they are completely different?

I'm clenching my teeth and try staying with CM10.1, but some regular glitches are driving me up the wall. There are two apps that crash the system regularly - Skype and Waze. Plus regular Bluetooth switch-offs. Small relief is - GPS does not lock off after upgrading radio with one that came with stock JB...

I don't know if I shall stay and wait or try a Padawan or some ROMs based on stock JB...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ipprof:
I was about to shift after uninterrupted years with cm . But when I looked at the other forums I saw they are not glitch free either. Cm is really bad right now but I'm staying for a bit more.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] TheHamPimp:
Right now, it seems like feature creep. They're adding and tweaking, when soon they're going to need to bear down and concentrate on bug fixes. I'm sure it'll happen soon, just patiently waiting.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jbehymer:
I wouldn't wait.. I have used the Padawan and its pretty smooth.. Also try out black jelly alpha.. don't flash the theme for alpha unless its been updated today or newer. its still glitchy and have had better luck without.. if do the alpha you can use Padawan kernal and runs soooo smooth its crazy... i also use the modem in Padawan thread page 275 i believe..Anyway check it out if you haven't already....:laugh:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jimmer411:
After removing usb mass storage I dropped CM and haven't looked back. It seems like all they are doing is taking massive steps backwards lately.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] khaytsus:
So you're still in this thread why? Stop griping.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] rohankb:
I use File Manager from inside my cell to copy files back and forth to my desktop shared files from inside my house over wifi.

Haven't plugged it into a desktop in months

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ipprof:
This is my first non cm ROM I've ever flashed. Padawan. No freezes, no crashes, no nothing except functionality. I can't believe I waited so long. The only thing I miss is using the volume key to move the cursor. And the crashes.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717 using Padawan & Tapatalk 2
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] abuthemagician:
How does that relate to this thread? Everyone here understands what to expect when flashing this to our phones. Please keep other ROM discussion out of this thread.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ipprof:
I don't see why. One major means of assessing development is how it compares. And for the last year or so it simply doesn't.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] abuthemagician:
The only reason this thread exists is to support CM 10.1. If I want to look at stability of other Roms, I will check out the threads on other roms. Otherwise I expect only to see info relating to CM10.1 on the Galaxy Note, and it's attendant features / issues. It would be posting how to rebuild a VW bug in a thread about Ford Mustang carburetors.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Jmelendez1:
Been on 5-29 nightly for the past few hours. So far so good as far as reboots are concerned. Knock on wood.

Edit: This build remains buggy as the rest however, if you change the build prop same as you would for correcting the music player crashing, it seemed to stabilize pretty good. Rebooting and free ups seemed to have gone away instantly. I'll report back tonight if this holds up.

Edit 2: Spoke too soon. Bugs remain. :thumbdown:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Xstop:
Thanks, you saved me a flash.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] patch_Adams:
I made a build of cm 10.1 It is based off the one you guys are having trouble with, but I ran it for a couple of days and didn't have much issue. Just a reboot of two. You could try it if you want, or not....it is here:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2257149&page=4
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] thetaminator9274:
I agree with you. One of the best ROMS out IMO.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] srpanadero:
5-29 nightly also a bust.

Tried a lot of 4.2.2 ROMs all the updated ones have the same problem as this one with freezes and rr's, even non-cyanogenmod based. If they use source after 4-18,4-24 They are flaky, anything before is ok. So of course a 4.1.2 would be stable.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] thetaminator9274:
Try out the new BeanStalk Rom with the 4Ace's kernel. I haven't had a problem with it yet, except for the camera bug for instagram and apps like that.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ipprof:
Don't you know we're not supposed to mention any other ROM s? It's against the (someone's) rules:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jimmer411:
5-30 is also broken. Graphical glitches and freezes galore.

Its looks like RC3 is starting to roll out for some devices as well.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] abuthemagician:
Just trying to keep on topic
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] srpanadero:
Tried beanstalk too, it mostly made it with minimal freezing until it came time for a Google drive scan, which really locked up tight. I need for all that stuff to work.

All this rom flashing has made me appreciate how well my M3 backup works. :D

Edit: from another thread:

"...

I think that I shall never see

a 4.2.2 ROM that is reboot free...

Lol
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jlpatte2:
I seriously wonder if the reboot issues are something as simple as screwed up memory numbers somewhere... I have found I can force a reboot by just toggling through a bunch of memory heavy apps really quickly. I played with settings and can stop the reboot behavior at the expense of massive (tens of second long) lag if I force the system to clear things out of memory sooner.

Who knows, also does super user binary really get updated like daily or twice daily? I'm always getting the message it's out of date and needs to be updated, including every last time I have a unexpected reboot

Josh
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] srpanadero:
If you are using RC1 or 2 you should do that and post to Jira. Great if you can duplicate it as you can do it while running logcat over adb. Can post the log and the last_kmsg file.

Do not have superuser updating here...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] khaytsus:
Are you sure your system is clean? You shouldn't have anything about Superuser bin being out of date in CM recently AFAIK.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] rohankb:
I'm testing out changing the cpu to ondemand and changed the cache to 2mb

Seems a bit better to me.

Last few nightlies, seems like I can't even go into my different browsers without it freezing and eventually rebooting after a minute or two. Was getting annoying.

So far (crosses fingers), so good...

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I717
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jimmer411:
Anyone else notice the cpu speed won't go above 1242mHz? Even with performance governor and min speed set at max it caps at 1242.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Frankenbiker:
Anyone else notice a huge spike in data traffic on 5/31?

I'm showing a whopping 4GB on the 31st. Luckily I'm on wifi at the moment. Otherwise this would have added $50to my phone bill..

-blaine
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] khaytsus:
Nope. Bad math.

https://plus.google.com/117962666888533781522/posts/jE4Abeoc1Yi
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Frankenbiker:
Thanks. :)

At least it wasn't something stupid, like the 500GB reported by one commenter.

-blaine
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Truetek:
Yea, I noticed that too... I didn't really notice a drop in performance, but I still would like to know why it's underclocked? Bad math again? Stability? Battery life?

I'd personally like full speed back since I got the 5200mah battery anyway...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] abuthemagician:
Anyone see better stability with the latest nightlies?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Frankenbiker:
76 hours and counting on 6/03.

-blaine
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ipprof:
Is it still crashing/rebooting at all?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ukguy115:
Still crashing here 6/6 but seems better than a week ago.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jimmer411:
Battery life was pretty poor and I noticed input lag when first opening input fields in pretty much everything regardless of which keyboard I would use. That was the only reason I noticed that the clock speed was capped so low. As of 6/3 I'm back to my stock, the constant crashing and reboots are too much.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ImSteevin:
I'm going back to RC2 for a while, this nightly seems to be getting worse and worse
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Anthony820:
Last night I tried a 4.2.2 ROM based on CM's kernel. I won't name names, but it was, by far, the most unstable ROM I've ever experienced. I got *3* RRs while trying to download another ROM. I ended up restoring a backup just to download something else to flash. It makes me die a little on the inside when I think about how in February and early March we had a very, very stable fast kernel, and now -- upon the release of that source code we all thought would make our lives great -- the non-TW JB kernels are complete crap.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] stgeorge88:
development can be spiral sometimes and im sure the devs will smooth things out soon.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] khaytsus:
https://jira.cyanogenmod.org/browse/CYAN-1057

Can you guys try this bug out and see if you can reproduce the issues? I'm not on CM right now or I'd give it a shot. Failing all else, I'll nandroid and try it out.

Easiest methods to reproduce are just running either of these apps..

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.kfbtech.wallswitch

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=nl.rogro.GScriptLite

Also GPS Toolbox goes weird too.. Launch it and exit and few cycles, eventually the Map goes corrupt.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ipprof:
---------- Post added at 08:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:07 PM ----------

[/COLOR]

I am really not that optimistic . The nightlys have shown no improvement. Somewhere I feel they took a wrong turn and won't admit it. I'm not using cm anymore after years of loyalty. There are too many really superb and stable ROMs out there to suffer these mistakes.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jlpatte2:
What are all these superb stable roms? I though almost all the i717 roms were based on the cm device tree at least for kernel... that would leave 2 tw based roms?

I'm on padawan jb2 but I'd much prefer to use a cm build, or derivative but the reboots are just so frustrating after a month of trying every other nightly let some others do it for a while. ..

Update: Just saw this very interesting commit for the Next nightly:

"Use low memory killer from pre 4/24 kernel" that is the date reliability w went into the craper, so maybe this Will help?

Josh
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ukguy115:
Comment on commit

"Jun 7 11:28 PM

Patch Set 1: Verified+1 Code-Review+2

The interesting thing here is that upgrading to the Samsung-provided OSS code was a GIGANTIC waste of time. We've gained zero from it, and have had to basically undo all the things that they ****ed up."
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] briand.mooreg:
20130607 has been the most stable nightly for me in quite a while. No reboots in almost a full day, for what its worth.

---------- Post added at 02:02 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:57 AM ----------

Those apps haven't been updated since 2010 and 2009 respectfully. Their Devs need to update the apps for 10.1
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Frankenbiker:
Seeing that, I have to wonder if all the Samsung code was designed to be useful for TouchWiz.

Since CM doesn't use TW, one could naturally wonder if they wouldn't benefit from going back to the pre-4/24 kernel and work from there. Although, given that that particular code is seven weeks old (an eternity in this particular business), I don't know that it would actually make any real benefit...

-blaine
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] khaytsus:
I realize they're old, but they worked prior to 4/24 on CM10.1 and work fine to this day on the Nexus 7.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] briand.mooreg:
I that case, ignore my post. :D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ipprof:
You know the YMMV deal but you and I are on the same ROM. Zero reboots zero freezes.What an experience. I felt bad leaving but it was impossible to stay.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] TheHamPimp:
I've looked at that particular ROM. It's a 4.1 ROM, and it's 500+ megs full of weirdness (BEATS audio?!). Feel free to use it, but it's not for me.

What we could probably use soon is a RC3/4 build, so that we can put something recent on and report or update bugs. Right now, RC2 is pretty ancient for our devices.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ipprof:
ROTFL. I agree (almost) 100%. Weird doesn't quite capture it. I'm actually a bit embarrassed to have that particular item and all the Star Wars stuff. But in the end it's all about performance not labels and numbers. Zero freezes. Zero reboots. That says it all after two months of hellish nightlys. I'll bet if you actually tried it you'd like it.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] smo1970:
I ran padawan for a bit and it was good for what it was. Too touch-whizzy.

Running beanstalk now and I really like it. Unfortunately I've had reboots but it can go days without. I didnt realize how much I missed the 4.2.2 features

Still keeping a close eye on cm10.1. I still think they'll pull through. Just a setback. In the meantime beanstalk is working great.

I'd rather deal with occasional reboots than deal with touch-wiz
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jlpatte2:
Well I am running nova launcher, so that hides a lot of touch wiz... makes it feel sorta like cm... lol

A biggie for me is analog dock audio for in the car. Yet another casualty of the 4/24 changeover , like that Will take even longer to get addressed than the reboots...

Josh
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] briand.mooreg:
I ran 0607 for 24 hrs and no reboots. Same for 0608 and no reboots. Flashed 0609 and so far so good.

Now I don't BT or tether, so can't speak to that. I have 69 user apps installed. Maybe things are getting better?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ukguy115:
On 6/8 after disable hardware overlay gain gallery video playback, drive scan function, and gallerty video trim capability. Reboots not so bad now.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] tonyo123:
Staying with CM for sure but for now 4/23 release

After the 4/23 release I ran into some of the problems documented previously here. After many reboots and freezes I went back to 4/23. After reading a few of the posts, I then tried several of the other ROMS. Worked well upon initial flash but once loaded up with my normal high number of apps none ran as smoothly or felt as familiar as CM10.1. So, I worked through the May and early June updates and still had numerous reboots. So, again went back to the very stable 4/23 release plus Chris41g's 4/21 kernel (mainly for fast-charge functionality as it had no overclocking at that point). Runs great. Really could even say it is stable enough to be the long-time CM10.1 ROM. Definitely sticking with it and will check occasionally to see if the latest nightly improves upon the reboot issues (kernel related?). My thanks to Jamie especially and to Chris for all their fine work.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Ltilt2:
Can I pls get a link to the 4/23 release. Thank you!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] srpanadero:
Edit
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Ltilt2:
Yes I know where to look but Im on my phone and the earliest I see is, 6/5 nothing before that. Before posting here I did google it but was not successful.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Jmelendez1:
I been running the latest release without any freezes or reboots since yesterday. Seems to have stabilized. I'll report back if I see anything.