yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] magicw:
I'm sorry I don't want to spoil the euphoria - but there was a discussion in a German forum about eliminating MMC_CAP_ERASE command as remedy for this brick:

http://www.android-hilfe.de/5171617-post1.html

It's quite in-depth of semi-conductor stuff - I try to summarize how I did understand this post: A NAND-memory consists of blocks with a size of 256kB. Information is stored pagewise and a page contains of 4kB of information while the memory is erased blockwise - i.e. the full 256kB will be erased at once.

MMC_CAP_ERASE was designed to erase one block once and then write one or more pages into that memory block.

If this command is eliminated. The sequence is in that way that the content of that block is being cached, then the block will be erased, then

only one

page will be written. And this repeates as many 4k-pages have to be written into this block.

So finally in the worst case that memory block (256k) will be erased 64(!) times to get all new data stored. Hence, reducing the lifetime of it significantly. Because, in that post it is assumed that such memory chip can survive 10000 erasure cycles. If reduced by factor 64 this means you may carry out 160 flash cycles and then the memory block may end its service somehow or will become faulty.

Well, my interpretion is: for Samsung this solution is o.k. because they won't do 150 update ROMs for any device. But for a developer there still is a risk of slowly bricking his device because he is flashing his device far more often.

Honestly, I didn't find anything here on XDA underlying or denying this thesis, but it sounds so comprehensible that I will keep on staying of 2.6-Kernel based recoveries until further information exists about this emmc-brick stuff.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] miloytyn:
10000 erasure cycles sound bit low to me. The NAND we used in phone we developed in my work supported 100000 write cycles and when we tested it the first block failures did indeed start appear around that number of cycles.

Of course it could be that the flash in this phone supports less cycles.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] ktulu84:
i think that i miss something... if i write only one page, then i erase again the block, the block will be empty, and if i can write only a page how i could fill the block? the process never ends... i think that is something wrong in what you are saying.

edit: maybe it is that with mmc_cap_erase i don't need to erase all the block to delete only one page?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] spaazm:
I'm just assuming it, but could anyone confirm that MMC_CAP_ERASE has not been eliminated in 2.6 kernel based TWRP 2.5.0.0?

And just to make me sure if it's bulletproof safe of emmc brick.

⇜ SGS+ ↭ SlimBean 4.2.2 build 3 ↭ K^Kernel JB V1.7 OC exUV 390MB ↭ InfinityEngine V2.1 ⇝
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] ktulu84:
as far as i know 2.6 kernel doesn't support this capability, so this can't be the real method to erase a page
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] chocotermi:
I've installed TWRP 2.5.0.0 by David Teri from 21.413 with fixed mmc brick and my phone lives and he's very well ;) - It's safe now
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] roshan2989:
does the twrp works on 19000...?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] anuseb89:
Nooooo....this twrp is ONLY FOR I9001...
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] ZordanKV:
TWRP [2.5.0.0] [15.04.2013] is the best one for me. No reboots when fixing permissions like with other versions. :good:
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] ktulu84:
tried CWM 6.0.3.1, had an error while restoring system and then the recovery shutdown
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] EB20XY:
can confirm that.

no problems since 2 weeks now with that version.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Kikonez:
this 2.5.0.0 is good for now with kernel 3.0.. and no bugs :}
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Dblaster:
Yep. TWRP 2.5.0.0 with 2.6 kernel is working fine. No reboots and no problems so far. I tested the recovery without rebooting to it, and had no problems.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] ktulu84:
tried both TWRP 2.5, the one with 2.6 kernel and the one with the 3.0 kernel. both shutdown while doing backup if no "reboot to recovery" but both are stable if you reboot to recovery, i choose the one with kernel 3, it seems to work better :D

EDIT: forgot to say what i tested: backup, factory reset, flash of rom, gapps, mods and kernel, reboot, restore of the backup. all works fine and i have a bugged EMMC, this recovery is safe to use
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] DaBigFreak:
How to do the "sequencial backup", meaning for me, that backups are made that way, only the new needed files are backupped, the huge part which is the same, is not touched...?

Installed the 2.5.0.0 working with CM10 and CM10.1
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] ktulu84:
I think that twrp doesn't support incremental backup, but it supports compressed backup
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] DualJoe:
USB does not work here. The device is not registered at all in windows device manager.

Edit: TWRP-2.5.0.0-ariesve_2013_04_15.zip (from 1st post) works properly.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] francescohtc:
Hi guys what is better?

TWRP or CWM Touch?

thanks
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] ktulu84:
Twrp is way better than cwm... its faster!

Inviato dal mio GT-P3110 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] DualJoe:
Fix permissions fails on TWRP-2.5.0.0-ariesve_2013_04_15.zip.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] KingKuno:
I have no reboot, usb works and fix permission works, too. If you complet flash a rom you have to restart the rom and then go in recovery and fix permission.

I use 2.5.00 :).
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] EB20XY:
also no problems at all
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] :
Hi, i'm using 2.5.0.0 from 2013.04.15. Today i had a shutdown wile doing a restore of a nandroid backup. System was restored but no data. I had to reboot to recovery again and restore only the data.

Just want to report that.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] francescohtc:
had a lot of problem with TWRP, fixing permission had a shutdown, i'm back on CWM more stable.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] ktulu84:
You have to reboot in recovery, do not use button combo

Inviato dal mio GT-I9001 con Topatalk 2
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Ubuntu-i9001:
Twrp is great no bugs for me
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] francescohtc:
and is what i do, i reboot in recovery from os, but TWRP is unstable for me, this is my experience, i had some error while flashing and some problems going back to CWM... ;)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] ktulu84:
Ok, so is not usable for you

Inviato dal mio GT-I9001 con Topatalk 2
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] psaikia:
How to fix the reboot in TWRP 2.5.0.0

But in CWM there is no reboot .

But I like TWRP.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] EB20XY:
Just start from ROM into TWRP once
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] psaikia:
Thanks , Let me try
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] alireza7991:
I have a question

Any body got bootloop problem by flashing cwm ?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] stepie22:
No, not really, but it happens. I got one when I first flashed TWRP from stock recovery. There is a solution in the wiki thats pretty simple, just re-flash the bootloader.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] 7med:
If you mean recovery boot-loop, I've got it by flashing CWM5 from stock recovery.

The solution described in the wiki works fine. No more recovery boot-loop after flashing the boot-loader via Odin.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] alireza7991:
thanks:) I know , I got that too when I flashed twrp for first time but I want to know that will I have bootloop again if I flash CWM using my currect twrp2.2.1 ??

and about solution , I think problem is related to param , will it be fixed by this command ???? :

cat /dev/zero > /dev/block/mmcblk0p14
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] tsirhcitna:
On the bootloop fix thread it says that probably the bootloader it's corrupted by kies failed updates, so I don't think you'll have bootloop, and btw flashing recovery doesn't affect your bootloader (I think)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] alireza7991:
I dont think so

Bootloops usually are made by a messed up

But I m not sure ! I asked that question to find out what really cuase bootloop !
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] tsirhcitna:
Oh sorry xD I thought you mean the bootloop in recovery, not logo bootloop
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] alireza7991:
No :)

I mean bootloop into recovery
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] JohnKersten:
I had the same problem.

I changed TWRP 2.5.0.0 based on kernel 2.x and USB is working fine for me.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] dnkncht:
Could anybody tell me were the feature ''wipe battery stats" in CWM touch is? I'm missing it under "advanced" ..
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] rickvrolings:
Its removed in latest builds. Install cwm 5.5.0.4
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] ganseki70:
Hi, I upgraded from TWRP 2.2.2.1 to the latest 2.5.0.0, then I tried to install the new Slimbean 4.2.2 rom, after a while the screen went off, this happend 3 times (I even tried to disable the screen off time out) only at the 4th time it was successful, what I was wondering is when the screen goes dark the process stops too ?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] :
As i know the process doesnt stop. Only the screen is off. Tap menu button brings it back. Hope i'm right.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] X-Jonte-X:
The screen went off just to safe your battery, the process will go on. If the process is finished the screen went on again, but you can wake up the screen any time to check how the process status is, as you do it normaly (power or home button).
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] ktulu84:
but this recovery may shutdown if you do not reboot in recovery and use the 2 button combo. if touch keys are on the recovery is finishing process and you can turn on the screen even by touching it (or pressing buttons), if the touch keys are off the phone shutdown and to avoid this you have to boot recovery, choose reboot in recovery and than you can safely work on it
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] tr4usut:
Twrp 2.5 still shutdown when restore backup.

Gửi từ GT-I9001 của tôi bằng cách sử dụng Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] ktulu84:
even if you reboot in recovery? for me it shutdown only if i access from 2 button combo
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] stepie22:
Yea, it does happen. Only when backing up it seems. On CWM too. Maybe we (someone who knows about this stuff) should check it out. Maybe it's just a typo? :rolleyes:
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] tr4usut:
It suddenly shut down when restore back up. I don't remember how i go to recovery. Sometimes by 2combo if phone hangs when startup. Sometimes by reboot to recovery
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] ktulu84:
You can use the reboot menu from the recovery to reboot in recovery :D

Inviato dal mio GT-I9001 con Topatalk 2
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] jumpers:
working on the I9000 ? device not listed on teamw.in. :(
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] kasper_h:
No i9000 has recovery build into the kernel so no possibility to flash a separate recovery.

Verstuurd van mijn GT-I9000
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] m0e_03:
has anyone tried this before?

check it out: ░█░ MIUI | TWRP by ATMOSF3AR Designs ░█░

Its for 720p supporting devices..so who knows it might work for us too.. :D

Edit: What a turn off!! I tried to download, but the download link is dead..i contacted the uploader to send me pm. ;)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] buffo1987:
CWM 6.0.3.4 + CWM 6.0.3.5 touch

As always use at your own risk :), not for bricked emmc-devices
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] ktulu84:
welcome back buffo!
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] JohnKersten:
Thanks for all this work.

One question: I am using TWRP 2.5.0.0 a couple of month now and never had any problem.

Is there a reason to install 6.0.3.5 touch version, are there special features which are not in TWRP?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] silverTwins:
using a new recovery is completely your decision.. I am still on TWRP 2.2.1 and am nt updating because it is extremely stable.. you can try it out as per your convenience
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Laurentyu1995:
I think no...it's ok if you'll use twrp 2.5.0.0
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] JohnKersten:
I just installed CWM Touch version 6.0.3.5, but I only had black screen, flashed it two times, no luck.

With Odin I changed recovery again to TWRP 2.5.0.0.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] sziggins:
Hi,

Black screen or very dark one almost impossible to see nothing? I tried long ago to build a touch recovery but I had problem using only a recovery image. The result was a successful build but after flashing it was working but no visible at all, almost impossible to flash another recovery.

There was a problem I think with a "/recovery/graphics.c" when I was trying to use the files mentioned at buffo1987's [GUIDE] Build CWM recovery instead.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] JohnKersten:
Black screen, for me not possible to read anything.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] FurFur_:
Hey friends i have a question .

Can i flash this TWRP 2.5.0.0 at gingerbread stock recovery?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] davidteri91:
Yes you can
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] kbal:
My bad :/
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] FurFur_:
Thanks :D
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] cakruege:
Everything version I tried is unstable.

I'm on stock

I'm trying to make a backup and even TWRP-2.2.2.1-ariesve with reboot from ROM (quick reboot) and than reboot from recovery to recovery reboots itself.

Is it possible to flash

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2212409

with odin?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] ze7zez:
If you can, remove the file first

/sdcard/TWRP/.twrps

or

/sdcard0/TWRP/.twrps

or

/sdcar1/TWRP/.twrps

or

/storage/sdcard0/TWRP/.twrps

or

/storage/sdcar1/TWRP/.twrps

If you can not delete the file .twrps, then remove the SD card and SIM card and try to re-upload the TWRP.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] cakruege:
That didn't helped at all.

Flashing to stock I9001XXKQM with odin, reroot and than install TWRP-2.6.0.0 worked for me!

(before I was on stock i9001xxkg1, rooted)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] adrianzowe:
Hi!

I'm also having problems. I flashed CWM 6.0.3.5 and all I get after rebooting the recovery is a black screen and soft keys on.

I was on CWM 5.5.0.4 :silly:
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] mandgeo:
I'm in the same situation as adrianzowe. I was on twrp, flashed cwm 6035 .zip and now i get just black screen.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] XeLLaR*:
AW: [TWRP 2.4.1.0 works, but ATTENTION: Do not use CWM 6.0.2.7 !]

Yes, via odin! No problem.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] okidokiss:
CWM Back to 5.5.0.4, very stable

I have many shutdowns with this, can't even make a restore, lost all I had on backup!
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] edisile:
i don't even know what i'm supposed to flash via odin... i mean where can i get the recovery in md5/tar format?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] buffo1987:
http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?jg0jjdg8amjlj3b informations about odin version + needed files on wiki page
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Aldokazer:
Re: [TWRP 2.4.1.0 works, but ATTENTION: Do not use CWM 6.0.2.7 !]

TWRP 2.4.1.0 rebooting after sometime. Which is the most stable version of TWRP without any reboots???
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] EB20XY:
2.2.1
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] buffo1987:
Officially TWRP 2.3.3.0 is the current stable release. But cause all want to have the newest version there are not that much users and so not that much feedback. But i got no error report.

2.4.1.0 is currently developt, so might be unstable

2.2.2.1 is base for other versions and ist stable

2.2.1 is an old stable version, well tested
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] edisile:
R: [recovery][twrp 2.4.1.0][cwm]

Thank you but nevermind... flashed cwm 5 from cwm6 and no problems. It seems cwm6 has problems when restoring backups

Inviato dal mio frigo a pedali.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] alexander757:
CM10 jb-3.0 causes instability on TWRP and CWM -> RISK of damaging or bricking phone

What does it mean? Is it really dangerous?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] XeLLaR*:
AW: [recovery][twrp 2.4.1.0][cwm]

Yes, a few people reported that their device wont turn on again. But only if the recovery is build on that kernek source
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] jjaacckk94:
R: [recovery][twrp 2.4.1.0][cwm]

Has someone built the 2.3.3.0 stable version?

Inviato dal mio GT-I9001 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] buffo1987:
download on op, please look closer next time :cyclops:
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] ruthlessrat:
Odp: [recovery][twrp 2.4.1.0][cwm]

Sorry guys I am new with Twrp.

Can I just lunch zip file directly from my CWM 6?

Wysyłane z mojego GT-I9001 za pomocą Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] EB20XY:
yes, you can just install twrp via zip using cwm.

don't forget to wipe cache and dvalik
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] ruthlessrat:
Odp: [recovery][twrp 2.4.1.0][cwm]

No problem if my plus works with newest alpha 7 and CastagnaITs kernel?

Wysyłane z mojego GT-I9001 za pomocą Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] ruthlessrat:
Odp: [recovery][twrp 2.4.1.0][cwm]

Okey i did it. Twrp is great I just wonder if it is safe to flash eventual future Ivendor's or Castagna updates with it

Wysyłane z mojego GT-I9001 za pomocą Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] buffo1987:
you can flash all the same as with cwm
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] okidokiss:
wich one you advice?

2.2.2.1 or 2.3.3.0 ?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] ruthlessrat:
Odp: [recovery][twrp 2.4.1.0][cwm]

I don't know what the difference is m8 but I choose 2.3.3.0

Wysyłane z mojego GT-I9001 za pomocą Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] mr_nickless:
TWRP 2.4.1.0

-when im trying to back up im getting a red failed

-same for flashing :\
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] ruthlessrat:
Odp: [recovery][twrp 2.4.1.0][cwm]

Try 2.3.3.0 I've checked all options backup restore flashing all works fine

Wysyłane z mojego GT-I9001 za pomocą Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] mr_nickless:
fixed!

solution:

delete /sdcard/TWRP/.twrps
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] GoMati:
Hello guys!

I've just flashed your recovery - it seems to work fine, but there's someting wrong going on with my phone. It just shuts itself down after ~~1min, doesnt matter what I do. It's really disturbing when it comes to backing my system up, cause phone's dying in the middle of it.

Any solutions? Advices?

Thanks in advance!
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Aldokazer:
Re: [recovery][twrp 2.4.1.0][cwm]

Happens with me too with 2.3.3.0 and 2.4.1.0 both. Haven't tried the other one yet.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] EB20XY:
If you have shutdowns, please just use version 2.2.1.

That one is absolute stable and you can flash all things (JB, ICS, kernels, etc.), whatever you like.

buffo1987 tries to make the other versions as stable as that too, but needs time.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] GoMati:
Unfortunately this one shuts itself down too after ~~1minute. I don't know what makes it happen, but it still does. Telephone charged up to 90%+ of battery and still...

Any other ideas?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] okidokiss:
See Post #62, maybe it solves the problem.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] EB20XY:
I did mean 2.2.1 from here: 2.2.1

I comes from the orignal thread: twrp dbx4

Again, here in the 2.4.1.0 thread buffo1987 tries to make the newer versions stable, what will take some time.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] GoMati:
Yeah, this one solved the problem. Big thanks, I thought that the one (2.2.1) on the first page of this topic was also stable :P

Again, thanks a million for helping, guys!:victory:

Just btw, can this one be installed from stock recovery? My pal also needs a new one and I think a out recommendation :)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] ruthlessrat:
Odp: [recovery][twrp 2.4.1.0][cwm]

Flashing from stock should be ok i think

Still I did it via cwm 6.0
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] EB20XY:
can always be flashed. By the way, on the first page of this thread is version 2.2.2.1, what is not the same as 2.2.1 :)

2.2.1 is extreme stable and all others are only "trials" to get a newer version in place.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] ruthlessrat:
Odp: [recovery][twrp 2.4.1.0][cwm]

Just installed newest one. Flashed kernel made backup reboot recovery reboot system fix permissions wiping cache & dalvik cache all works fine so far no reboots
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] adomm420:
Re: [recovery][twrp 2.4.1.0][cwm]

Test if gps works stable, cause my problem of gps was becaise of 2.4.1.0. With 2.3.3.0 everything's working fast & good.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] okidokiss:
Is it possible that Recovery has some influence on operation of GPS?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] smeroni68:
NO... recovery is another partition indipendent from rom...
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] davidteri91:
R: [recovery][twrp 2.4.1.0][cwm]

Yes I installed TWRP 2.4.1.0 yesterday and works perfectly not random reboots anymore

Inviato dal mio GT-I9001 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] adomm420:
Re: [recovery][twrp 2.4.1.0][cwm]

I don't know how it is but my problems ended when I reinstalled rom using 2.3.3.0. When I installed with 2.4.1, gps somehow didn't fix sats, so I've tried installing with 2.3.3.0 and it works. I just said what happend to me, that's all.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] ruthlessrat:
Odp: [recovery][twrp 2.4.1.0][cwm]

Thx that was pretty logical

Btw

What is android secure and what is going to happen if I'll wipe it
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] smeroni68:
It is the folder where app moved (or installed) on SD card will be installed... if you have app installed there, you simply loose them (in case you wipe the folder)... if you need to backup also app on SD, just select before starting backup also that item in the list.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] ruthlessrat:
Odp: [recovery][twrp 2.4.1.0][cwm]

Is there any chance to wipe battery stats via TWRP?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] davidteri91:
R: [recovery][twrp 2.4.1.0][cwm]

No you can't wipe battery stats with TWRP

Enviado desde mi GT-I9001

ROM: JB PACman 4.1.2

KERNEL: New Kernel Nexus v6.5.1( TEST )

BASEBAND: XXKPO

RECOVERY: TeamWinRecoveryProject 2.4.1.0
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] EB20XY:
But even if you wipe the stats, your battery will not work better :)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] buffo1987:
new builds for download on op

cwm 6.0.2.8 standard and touch + twrp 2.4.1.0 with current sources.

CWM made with builder.clockworkmod.com
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] igni.selvaraj:
I installed the latest version and now i am unable to select anything in recovery.

on pressing menu button or home button nothing happens :( am unable to install any new rom now

please help to restore to previous version
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] ruthlessrat:
Odp: [RECOVERY][14.02.2013] TWRP 2.4.1.0 | CWM 6.0.2.8 + touch

Flash CWM via Odin

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1776095
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] buffo1987:
Which version?