yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] a4apple:
thank you! it's done. :D
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] EB20XY:
So, you use now TWRP 2.4.4.0 and have also no problems ? (shutdowns etc.)

All is OK now ?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] a4apple:
Everything is fine now. :D no more random shutdown. :D thanks!
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] mACSman:
+1

I can confirm :good:
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] stepie22:
Hi @ all

You guy's know that shutdown bug, well it seems to be not just TWRP. At least for me. I've tried the following recovery's and they all seem to have it:

CWM Recovery 6.0.3.0

TWRP 2.2.2.1

TWRP 2.3.3.0

TWRP 2.4.3.0

TWRP 2.4.4.0

Stock

broodRecovery (by: Broodplank1337 - based on CWM6.0.2.8)

Previously TWRP 2.3.3.0 was stable for me, but now now not so.

Stock could only be flashed by 2.2/2.3 (can't remember) - it failed halfway through. Just rebooting into system after trying to boot into recovery.

broodRecovery can be found on broodplank1337's site. It's a .img file it has to be flashed with tools like his 'quick flasher'.

Now, what I'm getting at here. Is there any link between them or is it just my phone that's broken.

ps. Just a random thought, could a app like 'No Moar Powah!!!' have anything to do with this??
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] anuseb89:
Re: [RECOVERY][28.03.2013] TWRP 2.4.4.0 | CWM 6.0.3.0 + touch | CWM Advanced 4.91.2

I had shut down once with 2.4.4.0 while restoring one backup..after next reboot it was all fine..no issues at all..as per buffos latest post , next releases will be based on cm10 or cm10.1..so hopefully this shutdowns may disappear..
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] buffo1987:
Building Environment CM10 RC1 Ivendor

Deleted
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] smeroni68:
will test soon... thanks

EDIT: but is it v2.5 or v2.4??
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] anuseb89:
thanks buffo..finally one based on cm10...hope shutdown issue suffered by some people will be gone this time..

will test and let you know the results..
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] buffo1987:
It is still numbered 2.4.4.0, but next will be 2.5.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] smeroni68:
Installed... v2.5.0.0... now will test a bit... let you know...

---------- Post added at 05:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:14 PM ----------

EDIT:

tested backup (backup location is not selectable and default is in internal USB card!!)...

wipe... dalvik and cache (new interface for selection)

fix permissions... OK

For the TWRP/BACKUP, I think there must to be adapted something in the config before compiling... CM10 has different mounting point... external card is usable and mounted anyway...
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] lafila:
It is selectable, just press the tab with the free memory label, a new screen opens

But i think 2.5.0.0 doesn't accept backup naming. At least it didn't worked for me. The backup name was the date and time, as if my entry was ignored

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9001
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] smeroni68:
The backup naming is working!!!...

EDIT: thanks for the hint on free memory... perfect...
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] stepie22:
I was so exited now, but alas, my phone likes to disappoint.

@all I'm sorry I've been so ..... about this, demanding that you know how to fix it. Sowwy.:silly:

PS. can a 0MB free space in internal memory cause this?? (I know, don't ask 'bout it)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] davidteri91:
Not working with cm10.1?????

Edit: v2.5 woow working very very good with cm10.1

Thanks buffo

Inviato dal mio GT-I9001 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] EB20XY:
I think he likes to use the most stable build environment to compile it.

That seems RC1 for the moment.

---------- Post added at 06:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:31 PM ----------

So, all works for you with this new version 2.5 ?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] magicw:
wooow, backing up flies. It took me 190 sec to backing up 1,4 GB - previous versions took 400-600 sec.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] miloytyn:
Which versions of TWRP are using kernel 2.6.x?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] smeroni68:
None!!!
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Jonboy2011:
all 3.x ? because buffo.... said in the /data unbricking thread that twrp 2.2.1 based on 2.x.x
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] smeroni68:
May be you are right... but only buffo can answer to that... sorry...
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] XeLLaR*:
Just downgraded to CWM 5.5.0.4.

Safe is safe ;)

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9001 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] tr4usut:
Still SoD when backup (v2.5)

The best rom for i9001

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2204480
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] alexisguitarra:
Could I use master branch 2.2.2.1 without any risk to brick data partition? :confused: Is it based on 2.x kernel?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] magicw:
bricking /data partition is an issue of CWM 6.0.2.7/6.0.2.8 to my understanding. TWRP isn't affected - don't mess this up.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] smeroni68:
Hi,

can you install this app and post the result screen?

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=net.vinagre.android.emmc_check

Thanks...
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] miloytyn:
No its issue of 3.x kernel if you read Ivendor's description.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] magicw:
yes, but maybe TWRP does not apply this specific command which leads to the potential emmc bricking. Well, perhaps buffo can find this out.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] buffo1987:
I faced the brick with cwm, if twrp is different i can not say, there were also problems but these were not reported directly to me and i do not know if it was emmc, or just shutdowns.

I can switch back to kernel 2.6 with twrp (cm 9 arco sources last updated 2 month ago) for twrp. All other 2.6 sources are older. For CWM do not know what i'll do. Perhaps no future releases, but recompiling older versions with last 2.6 sources and than waiting if kernel 3 problems can be solved.

TWRP:

Only my last TWRP 2.4.0.0 06.04.2013 is compiled on Kernel 3.

Ivendor's post about bricks http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=40007855&postcount=62. So it seems true that kernel 3.0 can cause bricks in recovery

CWM:

CWM Touch is different cause it is build with builder.clockworkmod where you can not influence kernel (perhaps only with the input-recovery.img). It is a black box.

CWM 6.0.3.0 (6.0.2.9) are based on kernel 3, cause there are no sources of kernel 2.6 for cm10.1.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] miloytyn:
Yes, maybe it is safest if you use 2.6 until we know more about this.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] EB20XY:
+1

and the version inclusive "[2.4.4.0] [28.03.2013]" was stable and fine in that way.

Only start into it from ROM or twrp itself and you have no problems at all.

(do not start into twrp with the "3-button-method" if not necessary)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] tr4usut:
Ok. Here is my screenshot.

The best rom for i9001

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2204480
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] smeroni68:
Hi buffo... CastagnaIT has prepared a commit for Ivendor to disable the flag on the kernel v3 regarding the MMC bug... next build of CM10 I think we will have the "safe" kernel for that issue... this means you can re-compile the recoveries with that base... Let's hope this will solve the problems...
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] XeLLaR*:
Delete this post
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] edpo1976:
So, it seems confirmed that all TWRP except the last one (from 06/04/2013) are safe, even on unsecure chips. Maybe it could be a good move to delete the link to that one compiled with kernel 3.x?. Just an idea.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] smeroni68:
New CWM v6.0.2.8 from Ivendor (Kernel v2.6 based)!!

Hi Guys,

Just report here that Ivendor has compiled the CWM v6.0.2.8 from a kernel v2.6... so it is eMMC bug free... for more details go to his Thread.... here the direct link to download:

For flashing with Odin: recovery-clockwork-6.0.2.8-ariesve-kernel26.tar.md5 | recovery-clockwork-6.0.2.8-ariesve-kernel26.tar.md5 (Needs AriesVE.ops)

For flashing as zip file: recovery-clockwork-6.0.2.8-ariesve-kernel26.zip | recovery-clockwork-6.0.2.8-ariesve-kernel26.zip
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] edpo1976:
Thanks, Smeroni.

Just to clarify, no change is needed in TWRP, except avoid the use of the last 4.4.0 version, compiled with kernel 3.x. All versions until this last one (release06/04/2013) are compiled with a safe 2.6 kernel. Am in right?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] smeroni68:
... probably Yes... but I still use the v2.5.0.0... I'm a stupid brave!!
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] buffo1987:
TWRP 2.4.4.0 (Branch 2.5) Kernel 2.6

Compiled with kernel 2.6, so should be save to use - use at your own risk

TWRP-2.4.4.0-ariesve_2013_04_08_kernel_2.6.zip - 4.83 MB
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] smeroni68:
Thanks... good move... I'll use this one...
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] edpo1976:
Thanks, now it is all clear.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] smeroni68:
Perfect job as always... thanks buffo...

In the next update of CM10, Ivendor has separated the manage of the kernels... see this commit... the second one is brand new and v2.6 image...

TARGET_PREBUILT_KERNEL := device/samsung/ariesve/prebuilt/zImage

TARGET_PREBUILT_RECOVERY_KERNEL := device/samsung/ariesve/prebuilt/recoveryImage
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] buffo1987:
Arco CM9 Kernel 2.6

TWRP-2.4.4.0-ariesve_2013_04_08_kernel_2.6.zip - 4.83 MB

Ivendor CM10 Kernel 2.6

TWRP-2.4.4.0-ariesve_2013_04_08_kernel_2.6_cm10.zip - 5.19 MB

Size differs a little, if there are any difference in performance or stability you have to find out.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] nihS:
Testing Wirth Ivendor kernel

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9001 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] smeroni68:
Please report here your test and if any problem... thanks
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Jonboy2011:
is it bugfree ? i currently use twrp 2.2.1 but no one can say if its base in 2.6 or 3.x kernel so i want to change..
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] miloytyn:
How do you do USB mount to PC with new TWRP? It doesn't have that mount button anymore.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] buffo1987:
2.2.1 is based on 2.6. Same as all my versions on op. All kernel 3 versions are removed
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] davidteri91:
Ok I use you twrp 2.5 compile with kernel 3 you think I need change the recovery ????
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] buffo1987:
I suggest so
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] magicw:
I'd rather think hat its a MUST change.

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9001 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] anuseb89:
I hope shutdown will be gone..will test and post results here..

Thnks.. :thumbup:

edit::tested..fixing permission is fast and successful. There is no shutdown bug..backed up entire thing and spent more than 7,8 minutes in recovery..screen is turning off as expected and no unexpected shutdown..am able to unlock and continue my work in recovery..i think this is as stable as 2.2.1.. ( tested version based on cm10 )..

good work buffo..thanks..
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] IceTe:
strange, i flashed the 2.4.4.0 from today but it still shows version 2.5 :s
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] buffo1987:
2.5 is right. Naming by me is wrong.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] IceTe:
oh good, i feared the worst already :D

also flashed an old cwm over odin and then twrp again to be sure

---------- Post added at 09:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:25 PM ----------

what about this?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] davidteri91:
Ok my report

TWRP 2.5 With kernel 2.6 CM10

I make the flash to my beta 2.2 Gapps and kernel and all works perfectly

Thanks buffo
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Sepp-Wurzel:
Hi

I tried flashing with new Ivendor CWM based on 2.6 kernel. Had some reboots in recovery and a lot shut downs when Rom ran. Evening when only running Google play to install the Apps.

Next gonna try your recoveries. Which do you suggest?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] buffo1987:
I suggest you the latest twrp version.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Sepp-Wurzel:
Is there a difference between flashing as Zip or via Odin?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] buffo1987:
The way of flashing of course. I suggest you to read the wiki page. Such questions have all been answered already :fingers-crossed:
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] buffo1987:
new builds TWRP 2.5.0.0

new builds TWRP 2.5.0.0

TWRP-2.5.0.0-ariesve_2013_04_09_kernel_2.6_cm10.zip - 4.88 MB

TWRP-2.5.0.0-ariesve_2013_04_09_kernel_2.6_cm9.zip - 4.83 MB

If CM10 build works for all of you i would stopp releasing 2 versions.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] davidteri91:
I used your build from yesterday with cm10 kernel and works very well for me ;)

Inviato dal mio GT-I9001 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] sziggins:
CWM 6.0.3.0 based on kernel 3

Hi buffo,

In post #342 you write: "Same as all my versions on op. All kernel 3 versions are removed" that only matters TWRP? As in #323 you mention that: "CMW is like black box....(nice that :)) CWM 6.0.3.0 (6.0.2.9) are based on kernel 3, cause there are no sources of kernel 2.6 for cm10.1.". My question is as the touch version is still in OP (CWM 6.0.3.0) is it our risk if we are still using it as you nicely mentioned at the top of OP?

Anyway, thanks for your work too.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] nihS:
So far everything worked for me flashing is very fast no troubles Here :)

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9001 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Sepp-Wurzel:
Technically speaking I know about the differences between flashing via Odin and Recovery. I also had a look at Wiki, but could not find an answer.

What I meant is the result....does both ways do exactly the same, or does eg ODINhas some kind of "better deleting old data" (sorry I´m not a programmer).

I just ask because I have so much problems with my phone, so I want to be on the safe side. If you tell me, it does not care to use ODIN or recovery, I would prefer recovery and use the link from your post 355.

Thank you
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] rickvrolings:
Both recoveries will work the same. No difference in performance or stability

Verstuurd van mijn GT-I9001 met Tapatalk
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] nihS:
Whats the different To this between the release With ivendor kernel? I personally think the I vendor kernel release works fine

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9001 mit Tapatalk 2

---------- Post added at 09:46 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:42 AM ----------

How can you have much problems with an galaxy s plus :0 I never had troubles with any Samsung its best phone factory I know. HTC and lg are the ones who make me craze :D

If you want tell me your problems via pm and I can help you maybe :):beer:

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9001 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] edpo1976:
Hi, and thanks Buffo1987 for your work. I've installed TWRP v2.5.0.0 for CM10, and so far so good (I haven't had the time to test it deeply, though; just wipes cache and dalvik and fix permissions after flashing the zip).

Sorry if this is a noob question (I've checked the official FAQs, but I got no answers) but, are the nandroid backups made with previous releases of TWRP (2.2.1, 4.4.0...) compatibles with this v2.5.0, in order to restore them?. And viceversa?

Thanks again for your work.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] sv2hqx:
on new version there is no usb mount eather

any news?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] davidteri91:
Buffo whats is different between this version and yesterday's version ???

Inviato dal mio GT-I9001 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] buffo1987:
CWM TOUCH is not open source. You can not compile it on your own. The only way to build the touch version is to use builder.clockworkmod. There you can not input a kernel. So I do not know what is happening. In fact that cm10+ normally runs on kernel 3+ I assume that it is risky to use it. But there were no reports of bricks with touch 6.0.3.0 until now. Perhaps the input recovery makes the difference if it is compiled on kernel 2 or 3. I really do not know.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] buffo1987:
Only little improvements in backup handling and the correct naming
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Sepp-Wurzel:
I sent you a PM, but not sure if it worked...0 messages in sent items
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] ho/bo:
Noob question?:confused:

Is it possible to flash ROMs and kernels safely using CWM or TWRP just as one likes it?

Because Ivendor writes to use CWM and doesn't even mention TWRP.

I thought there were only differences in some functions/optics and how the recoveries are made.

(With sgs+ I use cwm, with sgs adv TWRP)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] buffo1987:
Both work.

Can someone confirm that usb-mounting is working/not-working? (CM9 and/or CM10)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] mACSman:
TWRP-2.4.4.0-ariesve_2013_04_06 usb mounting working

TWRP-2.4.4.0-ariesve_2013_04_08 k2.6 cm10 usb mounting NOT working

TWRP-2.5.0.0-ariesve_2013_04_09 k2.6 cm10 usb mounting NOT working
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] smeroni68:
Yes, confirmed... in the last 2 builds is missing the touch button to Mount and later to Unmount...

Something related to the last sources i think... thanks for this highlight...
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] davidteri91:
Because in release 1 ivendor dont add the changes about recovery???

Inviato dal mio GT-I9001 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] smeroni68:
Release 1 is not suitable for Recovery compiling... the changes on recovery image are on the git and not yet released officially, so untill someone will not recompile with the commits, I think we do not have the right one to be used... Or I say something not correct?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] hiej:
hi!

also with version 2.5.0.0 I'm no able to restore backups: most of times my phone shuts-down during sytem restore partition or data partion restore.

this happens to me since version 2.4.4.0,

but if I do a restore without restoring cache the restore works fine every time.

(so that is the trick that I've used since now)

using instead v. 2.5.0.0 this trick does not works.

with old v. 2.1.1 I dont have any problem.

Is there a problem in my device or there's some thing I'missing with the settings?

my config is CM 10 R1 by Ivendor and CIT kernel 1.0.9

(but the problem happens also with ICS an GB roms)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] EB20XY:
did you used exactly this 2.4.4.0 twrp ?

concerning 2.1.1 I can confirm the absolute stability.

But with the "older" 2.4.4.0 I have also no problems at all.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] hiej:
no the 2.4.4.0 I'm using is the 2013.03.12 release

the 2.5.0.0 is the courrent version in the OP (ivendor version).
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] magicw:
Do you Start twrp with buttons or per ROM Restart into recovery?

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9001 mit Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] buffo1987:
I used latest git sources
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] buffo1987:
What about 2.5.0.0 cm9?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] mACSman:
TWRP-2.4.4.0-ariesve_2013_04_08 kernel 2.6 usb-mounting NOT working

TWRP-2.5.0.0-ariesve_2013_04_09 kernel 2.6 cm9 usb-mounting NOT working

TWRP-2.4.4.0-ariesve_2013_04_06 usb mounting perfect.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] iCloud:
Re: [RECOVERY][TWRP & CWM][(none-)touch][TWRP 2.4.1.0 || CWM 6.0.2.7]

Twrp 2.4.1.0,deleted configuration on sdcard,running ivendor cm10.1 alpha 7. What I did:

1)Install latest twrp overwriting twrp 2.2.1

2)backup

3)wipe system,data,cache,dalvik

4)restore*(at boot restore),restore again without boot*

5)back to recovery,full wipe

6)twrp home*

7)back to recovery,install ivendor cm10.1 a7*

8)install rom,gapps,castagnaIt kernel

* =shutdown
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] buffo1987:
1. cwm6 is fully compatible to cwm5

2. Have not tested, but would be interesting

cm10.1 alpha 7 would be great :D

Perhaps you can give 2.3.3.0 a try, since it was running stable when blackmambazzz build it, and now fix permission also works.

Are you able to reproduce the shutdown?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] anuseb89:
Used 2.4.1 today..was using 2.2.1... all I can say is it is goood..stable..

took backup...reboot to recovery -------- > fine

then reboot to system -------> fine

I think restore also will work... good work dude..thanks....
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] edisile:
R: [RECOVERY][TWRP & CWM][(none-)touch][TWRP 2.4.1.0 || CWM 6.0.2.7]

Thank you for the answers ;) which of the test cwm touch zips si working?

Inviato dal mio frigo a pedali.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] alireza7991:
Re: [RECOVERY][TWRP & CWM][(none-)touch][TWRP 2.4.1.0 || CWM 6.0.2.7]

Oh , Im afraid !

I wanna flash alpha7 with twrp2.2.1 but I afraid to brick my device !!
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] LiiQuoR:
Re: [RECOVERY][TWRP & CWM][(none-)touch][TWRP 2.4.1.0 || CWM 6.0.2.7]

If i'm on EHNDROIX II i must take the cm10 one? Because it's based on it !
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] smeroni68:
I've tested the multiple flash. I used for 2 times the install of 3 files (CM10 + GAPPS + KERNEL) and nothing strange has happened... works perfect...
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] EB20XY:
2.4.1.0 twrp works for alpha7 and all others
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] okidokiss:
I was just playing with menus, to see how it works and the phone just shutdown.

Config on signature
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] alaanto:
but does TWRP 2.4.1.0 work well ?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] alireza7991:
Re: [ATTENTION! Do not use CWM 6.0.2.7]

Can I flash alpha7 via TWRP2.2.1 ?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] EB20XY:
works sofar without such problems.

And smeroni68 flashed alpha7 with TWRP 2.4.1.0 as I understood.

Here the report: 2.4.1.0 use for alpha7
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] buffo1987:
It was downloaded alomst ~250 times. I do not know of any report.

CWM 6.0.2.7 Versions altogether < 50 times.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] smeroni68:
I'm using since release and sincerely I do not have any problem... I'm testing new builds of CM10 v3.x from Castagna and kernel too, so I flashed many times, also multi-file flash... no problem at all!!

As I "reported in a post", I've done every test possible included backup and restore... and no 1 problem... for my phone it is perfect, but I can imagine that for other user it is not true!!
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] EB20XY:
you mean that there are no negative reports about your twrp version 2.4.1.0 ?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] smeroni68:
May be here on xda, but on Italian forum, there are users that still have random reboots (exactly as it happened with previous version, may be less frequent, but still)... I'm convinced that it depends from the hardware, and if I'm right there is no solution... this seems to be a never ending story unfortunately...
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] XeLLaR*:
AW: [TWRP 2.4.1.0 works, but ATTENTION: Do not use CWM 6.0.2.7 !]

Yup, TWRP 2.4 gives me shutdowns too. Im asking myself what made CWM 5.5.0.4 so stable....
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] smeroni68:
R: [TWRP 2.4.1.0 works, but ATTENTION: Do not use CWM 6.0.2.7 !]

The age! I think the older recovery has been compiled with older kernel... And that's the reason!

Inviato dal mio ASUS Transformer Pad TF300TG con Tapatalk 2