yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Nexus 7 Themes and Apps] ruqqq:
Hi guys,

As nowadays I rely lesser on an x86 workstation and internet where possible, I need a way to be able to repack kernels with the proper ramdisk so that I can flash on my tablet/phone without worrying about incompatible ramdisk or without losing the ramdisk mods. A short workflow of the app:

You provide app with the original boot.img which has the proper ramdisk, and also the replacement boot.img with the new kernel

Click <Repack!>: Poof! A new boot.img with the proper ramdisk and new kernel is created for you

But of course, the app can even find boot.img in update zips and also replace boot.img in update.zips. What this mean is that you can:

Provide your original kernel update zip, and also your replacement kernel update zip along with the modules

Click <Repack!>: Poof! A new update zip with the boot.img that has proper ramdisk and new kernel along with the modules is created for you

In other words, NO MORE USING UPLOADING YOUR FILES TO AN ONLINE AUTO KERNEL REPACK... OR NEEDING A PC JUST TO REPACK YOUR KERNEL. IT'S REVOLUTIONARY! :P

Why is it a beta?

I haven't actually fully tested the app. It might break your ROM (which in that scenario, just flash back your original kernel). In other words, this app is FOR EXPERT USERS ONLY!

Try it, and report bugs or issues and I'll fix it. ;)

Download:

v0.1: Dropbox Link

P.s. I need a Holo icon designer for this app!

P.s.s. App Permission INTERNET and ACCESS_NETWORK_STATE is for AdMobs

Screenshot attached
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] lvandam:
Hi all,

I am trying to connect my Nexus 4 device to my computer via USB. I am currently running Ubuntu 12.10 with the latest Android SDK installed.

The problem is that I can't seem to properly connect the Nexus 4 so that I can see the device in the devices list of adb (using ./adb devices).

An entry to the USB rules list has already been added, which is this one:

SUBSYSTEM=="usb", ATTR{idVendor}=="18d1", ATTR{idProduct}=="4ee5", MODE="0666"

The file is named "99-nexus4.rules" and properly chmodded.

The output of lsusb is:

Bus 002 Device 012: ID 18d1:4ee5 Google Inc.

I have already tried to restart the adb server several times, but with no success. Starting the server as root didn't help either. I choose to mount the phone as MTP device on the phone itself.

Currently I am lost about what the problem is in this case. I would love to hear some feedback from you guys.

Thanks in advance!
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] nardusg:
Is adb enabled on your phone ?

Did you restart udev or rebooted ?

btw, saw this and work allot better than standard 12.10 mtp

http://www.webupd8.org/2013/01/upgrade-to-gvfs-with-mtp-support-in.html
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] lvandam:
Yes, every time after I changed something in the rules list I restarted udev and rebooted as well.
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kzoodroid:
Do you have java installed properly? Here is the post I used to get adb working on Ubuntu 12.10 (its post #62 the OP was for Ubuntu11). It didn't work till I set the proper permissions as stated in the post under editing the udev rules (line in post where it shows sudo gedit /etc/udev/rules.d/99-android.rules). I did a 64-bit install and it worked perfectly. Basically what you are doing is manually entering the Nexus 4 into the list of devices as its not there by default.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=19446284
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] lvandam:
That solution worked for me! Many thanks.
[RAZR i General] lgstoian:
THIS IS NOT A ARM DEVICE ! This is x86. Porting CM to this device would be an incredibly complex task as alot of CM code is ARM dependent. You are going about this the wrong way , these are two completely unrelated CPU architectures , you need to look at the Android X86 projects that are out there which I will link too at the end of the post.

ARM is vastly different from x86 and you can't run code designed for one on the other.

NO ROM for ARM will work on this , meaning no CM , no AOKP , no MiUi , and not even AOSP etc.

You need to work with the Android x86 sources provided by either Intel or the community x86 port.

Links :

http://www.android-x86.org

https://01.org/projects/android-intel-architecture

http://androvm.org/blog/

All these projects are FORKS of android highly modified to work on x86 !
[RAZR i General] Marco Lomas:
What about use a base of stock roms and make the things work??? I know Cm its for armv, but all its adaptable, :)

Enviado desde mi XT890 usando Tapatalk 2
[RAZR i General] Le_Poilu:
as for MIUI (there already is a MIUI port on the razr i, not complet I think, but it exist). MIUI is mostly a framework mod.. this is platerform independant AFAIK.

I don't think CM & Cie are so dependant of the SoC architecture. There's lot of différences between some ARM SoC .. maybe more than you can imagine. If CM can be adapt to so many device with so many ARM SoC witch a so différent, why not for a x86 Soc ?

I think you're a little bit pessimist here...
[RAZR i General] lgstoian:
I didn't say it's impossible but it's more complex then a normal port for an ARM device. The issue is it requires more knowledge on the issue and will eat far more time. A CM port to x86 is a very unlikely goal for a single dev , and I'm saying this because a few months ago I discussed this issue with the people behind Android x86.

So a talented DEV will be able to achieve this but it will take time and a bigger struggle , that's why to start of developing for this device it would be more reasonable to look at Android code already ported to x86.
[RAZR i General] hiemanshu:
Sure there is some ARM dependent code in the repos but most of android doesn't really depend on the arch (like apps using the sdk dont need to be recompiled for working on the I, see play store apps). I have worked with o1 and android-x86 and there isn't really that much change from CM and android-x86, just some extra optimizations for x86 which can be added in later.
[RAZR i General] Le_Poilu:
There are plenty of device on where even custom rom seems to be impossible. mostly because of a locked bootloader.

Look at the Motorola Defy. At the beginning, the development of a custom rom like CM was pretty impossible.... but they did it. They did it so far that the Defy became one of must used device with Cyanogenmod. And you now the most astonishing? It's thanks to only 2 devs.

I think bypassing a locked bootloader like the Moto one is far more tricky than adapting a CM ROM to a x86 SoC (while the device is natively unlocked).

AFAIK, android-x86 project is not so close to the Android we have on our phone.

When you develop a custom rom you can either take the AOSP source and try to put it on your phone : the tricky way. Mainly when you don't have access to the source of the drivers (ARM or x86 .. same fight)

Or you can take the official rom and mod it to reach the AOSP/CM/MUI/etc level. And I think on most device it's the way to go (unless the manufacturer release all the source code of the device.... something that never appends).
[RAZR i General] lord0815:
You really know what you are talking about? As others already mentioned above CM is in most a framework - porting android to x86 seems to be not such a big gap as motorola did it already and for sure you can run android on your pc - do you own an arm pc (in this case i think an rasperry pi...). The toolchain remains the same so why you make such a story out of it? Are you a razr i owner or do you just want to frighten all razr i devs and owners awaiting a CM port??

ARM architecture is different in some points but most of the work will do the compiler and to be honest i think there will be some more x86 phones in the future, intel never developed it for one or two phones....

So what is your intention with this topic??

kind regards.
[RAZR i General] freak4dell:
That's what I'm wondering. Any dev that's taking on this task obviously knows it's going to take a bit of extra work. It would have been different had the OP offered some help and advice, but he just posted the obvious while making it seem like a bigger deal than it is (at least I'm guessing it's not as big a deal as he makes it seem, considering the other posts in this thread). Nothing but fear mongering and pessimism at this point. Sure, we will have to wait a bit for the devs to figure things out, but I know enough of them picked up this phone that something will eventually come. Plus, there seems to be a bit of dev interest in the Intel Yolo as well.
[RAZR i General] mo976:
I don't know much about porting or developing and getting cm to run with all the necesary source and drivers is probably not easy but I do know that one of the basic options when running the build/make command for AOSP and CM is an x86 build for emulation. So basic x86 infrastructure exists does that ensure compatibility with this phone maybe not but it might help and certainly it would still require SOC and device optimization drivers but its probably the better place to start then tackling trying to port ARM based code and drivers.

However in the meantime my thinking is maybe a CM style rom could be achieved by first stripping down the rom making it "blurless" and then porting CM features especially since the latest Moto ROM's are comparatively closer to stock then sense or touchwiz. Of course I don't have the phone yet its in England waiting to be brought to me.
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mjrifath:
Guys,

Please check this link for LG Home Launcher..

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2120961

As per instruction in above link OP, i moved those {xHPDI Home Launcher/Weather} to System/App and set permision to rw-r-r. It nicely working.:laugh:

Is there any possibility to move those apps to Preload partition instead of System/App.

Thanks
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] yankeesfan714:
Im just curious who used the exploit fix and who hasnt. I havent done this and am not really concerned about malicious apps as I stick to legit apps. Should I be concerned enough to patch?

Sent from my SGH-I317 on jedi xp9 Saberkernel
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] gregsarg:
Honestly,

The exploit has not produced more than a handful of inquiries for our device over the past 8 months. and while I feel that it is at least important enough to mention, it's effects have been largely mute.

Also, our device does not contain this chipset. ours is the SGH-I717....And you have what device again ???

If you are getting software from trusted sources...(play store, XDA or a copy of playstore from friends etc.) you will likely never see an issue.

It seems when folks start pulling a curious piece of code from some way out source, they get burned. But if pulling normally, then your good.

You mentioned the SGH-I317 in your signature line. Is that a typo ? or do you in fact have an SGH-I317 ?

If yes, and there is such a device, I'm not familiar with it....and you would be in the wrong area, and in danger of flashing the wrong items. (instant brick)!!

Additionally, I use and really like "lookout mobile security premium", as my android security software. It has saved my flashing bad software twice now. and although the opinion surrounding the ability for the android platform to catch a virus is often misguided, I continue to use anti-virus software on every computer I own. In fact, my note actually uses 2 anti-virus software packages. ( call me crazy, but I've "NEVER" caught a virus on the android OS)

Stay with trusted code, and run an anti-virus app. And if stock, or using touchwiz roms, use an auto reset blocker app as well.

With that setup, you are really in pretty good shape....g
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] ChronoReverse:
Our SGH-717 doesn't _have_ an Exynos chipset. Doesn't affect us.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] gregsarg:
Guessing OP does not have an I717.....

I certainly hope he does "NOT" flash anything from this section, to his note variant device....g
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] yankeesfan714:
Dammit. Wrong note forum. My bad
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] gregsarg:
No worries, i'm just glad you did'nt flash anything from this section...

Happy flashing....g
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] rangercaptain:
Yeah, the international note N7000 has that set.

I don't think you're bricked if you flash it - - it probably won't run the script.
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] amelvjose:
I have been using admob for three months now...

i have 12 android apps requesting ads from admob...2 of them from amazon app store (added last week)..others from google play..

The problem is that since about 4 or 5 days i can't make any write changes to my account...this includes

1.cant change refresh rate..

2.cant add new apps..

3.cant modify the market url for existing app(for my new apps from amazon store,which has the same package as another app from google play.For admob it should be like same app requesting 2 ads..is that a problem?)

4.cant change colour of ads.

that's all I have checked until now..When I try any of these,i simply gets logged out from admob..then i will have to login once again..

There is no problem with reporting and revenue updates...

I have tried from Chrome and IE..i am from india..

Also,i would like to point out a change in admob login..Earlier I could login to google with another 'google id' while logged in to admob..But now it seems they are connected. Logging out of google logs me out off admob too..

is it just me or anyone else have the same experiance?
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] amelvjose:
anybody?

any idea?
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mrgoodtobi:
Hi guys,

I have a problem, recently. Normally, when I call I can hear the other person and he can hear me.

But lately, I can't hear the other person anymore, while he or she still can hear me.

What is the problem?

I'm running:

CyanogenMod 10-20121210-UNOFFICIAL-I9300

V103

Smalband: I9300CEELL1

RIL: I9300XXELKC; I9300BUELK1

Please help.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] SirFork:
Before i start barking up the customer support tree, i was hoping to get some insight from the forum. Paid 20 bucks for this game and all it does on my phone is crash seconds after launching. I'm running Jellybam and wondering if anyone else has this game working for their device. Thanks!
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Furies:
Before contacting customer support (which I don't recommend, seeing as your using a custom ROM), I'd try a stock Sense ROM with the game, and see if that improves anything. HTC knows their GPUs better than anyone, and there is a pretty good possibility the game will work with proprietary drivers.

The best comparison I can draw is this: Battery life on my Dell XPS 15 inch triples on my Linux partition when I use proprietary drivers compared to the open source ones, because the open source drivers weren't optimizing the GPU clock speed and screen brightness well.

Try the company's software that made the phone first before anything else.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] WTFunk:
Pretty sure I remember something along the lines of Square Enix making their games unplayable on rooted phones. This might be one.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] mrjaydee82:
I'm on cm10.1 and runs perfect

My blazingly fast as f*#k One XL fueled with CM10
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Morti:
For the benefit of anyone else who finds this on Google:

SEE Agent Pierre: Hello and thank you for contacting SQUARE ENIX Customer Support. Just a few moments while I review your question, please.

You: Okay.

You: Are you still there?

SEE Agent Pierre: just a moment please

You: Okay, no problem.

SEE Agent Pierre: (sorry about that, will be 2 minutes if you're ok to hold)

You: Yeah, that's fine.

SEE Agent Pierre: thank you for waiting Sir

SEE Agent Pierre: so I understand you are having issues with FF Dimensions on yur Galaxy Note, is that right?

You: Galaxy Note II, yes.

You: It crashes on launch. I wondered if this might be related to being rooted or setting a different DPI, but I didn't get time to test these things because of Google Play's 15 minute refund window. If it is one of those things, and there's something I can do about it, I can purchase it again.

SEE Agent Pierre: so you have been refunded the game by now and do not have it installed anymore ?

You: Correct. I'm seeing if I can find out what the issue was before I consider re-purchasing.

SEE Agent Pierre: alright no worries

SEE Agent Pierre: the fact that it is rooted is one of the cause

SEE Agent Pierre: If you bear with me I will look for any compatibility issue with the game and the G.Note 2

You: Okay, thanks. As much as I'd love to play the game, I'm not willing to un-root to do so. If there's a workaround that allows play on rooted devices, that'd be grand.

SEE Agent Pierre: alright, no compatibility issue was found with your device however it must not be rooted to support the game.

SEE Agent Pierre: you will need to un-root it but apparently you are not ready to do so

SEE Agent Pierre: is there anything else I can do for you today?

You: Is this the case for all Square Enix games? I was looking at Chrono-Trigger as well. I'm quite keen to give you my money, but not at the expense of being able to use a device I bought how I wish to use it.

SEE Agent Pierre: yes that's quite standard, you will find that in all our games

SEE Agent Pierre: sorry about that

SEE Agent Pierre: anything else I can help with?>

You: Thanks. Might be worth informing the person who made that decision that piracy is just as easy with or without root access and you're reducing your market somewhat.

You: I'll see if I can pirate the game and I'll purchase it from the Play Store again (though not actually download it) if I get the pirated version to work on my device. Seems to be my only option to actually play your games in a fair manner that means Square Enix gets paid.

You: Which is an odd situation but here we are.

SEE Agent Pierre: Thank you for visiting our SQUARE ENIX Support Chat line. Take care and have a good day!

You: Thanks for your help, all the best. :)

SEE Agent Pierre: you too, bye
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] InflatedTitan:
Dimensions works fine for me on both jellybam, rebelrom, and cleanrom... I can't get it to work on CM and xylon :confused:
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] k3v0:
I was able to get the game to start by restoring app data via TiBackup from a device that was able to run the game, after saving the game once. In my case it was an Asus TF300 to my Samsung Galaxy Note 2
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] SirFork:
OP updating. The game appears to run just fine on viperXL. On my nexus 7 it works fine on stock. Next time I change roms I'll follow the above post and use tibu
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] nevvjeff:
I have exactly the same issue, here with a note2 and paranoid rom, I just purchase this game, and it won't run, everytime I want to run it, it crach.

Apparently, nobody find somethink to help with it.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] k3v0:
Restore app+data using TiBackup from a device that works after you save at least once. Restoring before you save the first time will not fix a game that crashes on launch.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] nevvjeff:
Just have a problem.... I have no unrooted device to make this titanium backup...
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] Morti:
Right, so the APK itself is what checks for root access. I replaced the APK from the Play Store with an APK I got from somewhere else, and it works. Just installed it over the top. The game also checks for a legit Play Store license, which I have because I bought it. So no problems there.

Over-zealous anti-piracy methods push legit customers to piracy to get around them. Ridiculous. I don't advocate piracy, but if I've paid for something then all bets are off as to how I choose to make it work.

I'm also sticking to the XDA rules by not advising how you would go about duplicating my method. I'm hoping that mentioning the fact I got the APK from elsewhere is within the rules.

All the best.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] nevvjeff:
Work well for an official purchace with à downloaded apk.

The game launch, but at the first fight I have black screen and nothing more.............. :(

Thanks
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] 光保大塚:
I might be off here, since I'm still at the start-up crash stage, but it sounds like you have a version mismatch with the asset data. Make sure the APK is the same version as the hidden data.

SQ game me two official answers (none was the root issue)

1) Hide the shade bar.

2) Clear data, cache, and re-install.

Obviously neither worked. (Defy XT557D; stock V1.0.1 rooted crash, stock V1.0.2 rooted crash, hacked V1.0.2 over official license (with stock play store) crash.)
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] falkuto:
Restore app+data using TiBackup from a device that works
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] reaperzero:
actually i found if you are using any themes other then stock it will bork when it launches
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] MysticDeth:
That worked. I had Black Infinitum installed and as soon as I went back to the stock them, Dimensions booted up. But then I installed Black Exodus, and FF Dimensions booted up as well lol. Thanks :)
[Android] yuvrajsonawane:
As the title says it all.

I have a celkon ct2 tab which as sim facility.

i installed cyanbook jb v4 which is orignally made for micromax funbook. It is working well but the Phone.apk and other sim based apk dont work even though they are there in sys/app.

we cant install them and so dont know what problem is there.

i found that this jelly bean rom dont have baseband i.e. it is showing baseband : unknown.

so what is wrong with the custom rom ???

is it due to baseband or some thing else has gone wrong ???

Chef of the Forum :cowboy: come on help me out so that there could be and offical custom rom for celkon ct2 which many are searching but cant find it any where else.

thank you for reading my post.

i know there may be many things i missed like a researched but due to tight schedule in studies i failed to have it :(

have a nice night/day ahead :D
[Android] Sam Solomon:
I had a similar issue with my phone,I created a ROM myself based on Xperia Looks but after flashing it Sims not detected and baseband error,Baseband is working on its base ROM....I think its a issue with the files I added into it....Is the TAb having these features in Stock ROM

Sent from my Micromax A110
[Android] yuvrajsonawane:
The tab have ics 4.0.3 installed and do have sim slot so do call and sms facilities.

Where as mmx funbook don't have sim slot so no call features in there.

So what r the files to be replaced or modified to get this features activated ???

Cyanbook jb v4 have phone.apk files in system/app but don't support in real ????
[Android] Sam Solomon:
So bro,The stock ROm supports all these features right....

Sent from my Micromax™ HD
[Android] yuvrajsonawane:
Yes !!! Stock rom supports it all. Right now also using gprs and sending this reply.

The dev of the custom rom is karndev and I had send him an pm to regarding this but don't know if I successfully send that pm or not ....

If we are able to add all this features to it then it would be wonderful

:)
[Android] Sam Solomon:
Check if the modem.img is there inside the ROM

---------- Post added at 01:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:37 PM ----------

My Custom ROM also showed this error and it had also crashed when opening settings....It was due to using if incompatible Files on the ROM
[Android] yuvrajsonawane:
I cant find the modem.img file in root :confused:

can u specify where can i find it ????

and i was thinking ki there must be some sort of files which are missing and that answer only @karndev can give but he should be interested in reply this thread :(
[Android] Sam Solomon:
If you think so,compare files of both custom and stock ROm to be sure...:rolleyes: and I think modem.img is inside framework/etc