[Galaxy Note 10.1 Android Development] esgie:
I also had such an issues with Philz based on CWM 6.x

Use Philz v5, it works good even with the newest aroma:

http://d-h.st/BUs

Btw the bug has been found and reported in Philz Recovery for N8000 topic, hope the dev will fix it soon for v6.

Philz v5 (as well as v6) support exFat (incl. 64gb sdcards) out of the box - I can confirm that coz I use it myself; TWRP supports exfat cards, too. Didn't check High on Android...

[MENTION=892970]d4rkkn16ht[/MENTION]

if ur getting SuperSu issues as described above, I'd recommend turning on logging in SuperSu options, reproduce the issue and post the log here. Idea of reflashing supersu from chainfire's website, however, seems to be good. Also, if you have downloaded SuperSu from Gplay or installed it from apk file as an user app (= if you didn't flashed the recovery version...), don't forget to run the app itself at least once - it will prompt to update the binaries; otherwise, if using newer apk with older binaries, you may experience various, unexpected issues, such as one above.

---------- Post added at 11:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:49 PM ----------

This is not quite true. At the moment of Jelly Bean debut, SN10.1 (running ICS...) was probably (still) the most advanced, high-end (and very expensive!) Android tablet available on the market; releasing the newest Android (Jelly Bean) a few months after its debut was an obvious decision, aimed to throttle up its popularity and selling (which was and is quite average and worse than Samsung planned...), and it was a obvious continuation of "professional tablet" idea.

After over a year, we are in a moment near the end of the product-life-cycle...

(contrary: N7100/Note 2 have not reached this level yet, as it was selling x times better and is still selling good, ie. along with GSM operators contracts AND in the countries which are not so rich -Central and Eastern Europe for example)

...meanwhile, the competitors released a lot of good tablets, which are cheaper... Samsung will not earn much more on Note 10.1 2012 edition. So - he (hopefully not!!!) abandoned it. That's all. A business decision - they have calculated that it will be probably economically better to lose some earnings by upsetting some (quite low, I suppose... - I personally do not know ANYONE "normal" - ie. not working in the IT business - who care about the android version installed on his tablet/phone...) percentage of total (relatively, quite low, too) number of users, who care about Android version installed, than employ a team of programmers who will be after maintaining newest Android updates, distributing the firmware, etc etc.

Until it was not so sure that N10.1 will be an economical "mistake", Samsung cared. When it became obvious that it will not conquer the market - Samsung stopped to care. It's their policy, for sure, I had similar experiences with my old Symbian-based OmniaHD, which - AFAIR - received only ONE firmware update AT ALL, as it was selling really bad...

Different companies have different policies, it's obvious... They don't give a lot of effort to bind the customer to their products... If their device is not a success, they stop to support it, believing that the product will defend itself, ie. the customer will not change his favorite brand even if they suspend the support.

Financial balances of Sammy's seem to confirm that it is a profitable policy. And the minor percent of users I mentioned above ( us! ;] ) are unhappy... but we are a minority, so who cares?

If you are producing and selling some products, you do not care which product is called "Flagship", but which product is really PROFITABLE. N10.1 was too expensive. Tab2/3 wasn't - so it is much more popular, good selling, profitable - and so, supported...

I don't believe it either... BUT I'm checking it everyday, too, heh :)

Best regards