yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] calanthe42:
Mine just got here.

First Impression: It's White and the bezel is huge! Ugly Ugly Ugly

Hopefully, the black case I ordered will help.

It's a good size. (Still think the 8.9 size was perfect.)

Playing around and am impressed with the speed. It did get a little warm while it downloaded all my apps.

I had to go through the usual crap with Samsung getting it registered...they

still

have no record of the 5 other Samsung devices I have bought over the years. ( Everything deleted after the last firmware update of the 10.1.)

It's fast. And all the talk about the screen resolution is just silly. It is better than the 10.1.

I will test for the weekend. Then may sell the 10.1.

This just feels real good "in the hand". It's very light. The 10.1 is too big for my work in the field.

---------- Post added at 04:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:45 PM ----------

Mine just got here.

First Impression: It's White and the bezel is huge! Ugly Ugly Ugly

Hopefully, the black case I ordered will help.

It's a good size. (Still think the 8.9 size was perfect.)

Playing around and am impressed with the speed. It did get a little warm while it downloaded all my apps.

I had to go through the usual crap with Samsung getting it registered...they

still

have no record of the 5 other Samsung devices I have bought over the years. ( Everything deleted after the last firmware update of the 10.1.)

It's fast. And all the talk about the screen resolution is just silly. It is better than the 10.1.

I will test for the weekend. Then may sell the 10.1.

This just feels real good "in the hand". It's very light. The 10.1 is too big for my work in the field.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] Mr_Armageddon:
This Root method works fine on the Note 8, took all but 2min to do. Choose the bottom of the 3 exploits, "Aragon".

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2130276

I have been very pleased with the tablet so far. A huge improvement over my previous tablet (Asus Transformer Prime), and the size is perfect for me especially as a work aid. Battery life has been great for me, especially with "SmartStay" turned off, giving me about 2 days of moderate to heavy use.

Now just waiting for a Note 8 sub-forum...
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] docfreed:
Another Satisfied User

Just bought this (was coming from Galaxy Tab 2 10.1" and am already loving it. Perfect size for my somewhat smaller-than-average hands - also great for reading.

And many thanks to Mr_Armageddon for the root link and alephzain for the exploit - works perfectly - now I can remove/freeze the unbelievable amount of bloatware that Samsung installed. Already installed Titanium Backup.

Also just waiting for a Note 8 subforum (and Cyanogenmod 10.1) - I'm sure they will be here soon.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] kkretch:
They were in my local Sunday paper Best Buy ad today.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] nymviper1126:
Does yours have lightbleed? Mine is pretty bad, going back tomorrow.

How do you find the bezel? When I first saw the photos, they looked ginorous, but IRL the arent that bad. But, with some grips, my palm/fingers hit the screen, making me zoom in or whatever. This does not happen on my gf mini, I can rest my palm and still scroll sround, Must be a difference in multitouch recognition. Ive been actually wishing for a bigger bezel as its annoying.

The pen is amazing on this (I have 10.1 and N1 as references)
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] docfreed:
A very minor amount of bleed - not enough to bother about. Yes, it's a PITA sometimes because my hand hits the buttons (one reviewer noted this) - I'm sure that once we get custom ROMS there will be a way to turn the buttons off. On balance, this thing is very good - particularly once rooted and with bloat removed.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] Adrians620:
I think the note 8.0 is expensive because every tablet it'll be release on the next few months will come with snapdragon processor, more efficient and powerful than this. I'm a Note 10.1 user
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] nymviper1126:
Yea the buttons are another thing, not to bad tho. I meant when I hold one handed my palm registers as a touch, so if browsing with fingers it zooms in etc. This is not an issur while using the pen however.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] kkretch:
Can some of the new Note 8 buyers please post the new wallpaper for us to enjoy.

Thanks
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] s4vva:
Are any of you Note 8 owners based in the UK? Where did you buy it from? I am considering selling my Nexus 10 for one of these so I would love some of you initial impressions too. I think I may hold out for the 3G version.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] MSHampton:
When using the pen I've learned to simply rotate the screen so the buttons are at the top and out of the way. Works great!
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] nymviper1126:
Does anyone have an issue with the usb port?
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] docfreed:
Seemed to be tight and plug would not go in all the way unless I fiddled with it. After a few days it has mostly gone away.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] Mr_Armageddon:
Note 8 Forum has Arrived

We finally have a Samsung Galaxy Note 8 sub-forum!

http://xdaforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2243

Not much there yet, but its a start.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] TheWerewolf:
I had been waiting for the Note 8... and I finally got to handle one in a local store yesterday. I'd gone in seriously considering buying one even though I have a Note 10.1.

My main criterion was size. I wanted a tablet I could carry in my jacket inside pocket, which is easily large enough for 7" tablets. I have an old 7" phablet, and it fits nicely in there, but it's Android 2.3 and isn't ever going to be upgraded (the company has long discontinued it). Next was weight - I wanted something light. Finally, I was hoping for a pen device, treating it much like a notepad.

So, the first thing I do is try to slip the Note 8 into the jacket pocket (it was anchored - no one thought I was trying to steal it :) ) and alas, too wide. Then I took out the Note 10.1 and realized how big the Note 8 really is. It's not that much smaller than the 10 (yes, yes - 2 inches smaller but that's diagonal on the screen - in reality - it's still quite chunky.

It's only slightly thinner than the Note 10. And surprisingly, it doesn't feel that much lighter.

Which meant that even if I put aside not being able to stick it in my jacket pocket - it's still going to be only a bit easier to lug around than the Note 10.

That being said, if I didn't already have a Note 10 - and my choices were the 10 and the 8, I would be inclined to go with the 8 over the 10.

However, I do have a 10, so the 8 isn't in my future. Maybe if Samsung comes out with a 7" version (Tab 2?) I would consider it.

I then went and looked at the competition and was very disappointed.

The iPad mini is about the same size as the Note 8, but feels heavier and of course, has a substantially lower screen resolution. The Note 8's display just looks better next to the iPad mini.

The other 7" Android tablets they had were all weak. Most had resolutions of 1024x600 or lower (including the Samsung Tab 2 7), or had old Android versions, or were missing basics like a microSD card slot, or too little memory or on board storage, or no back camera, or were much thicker or heavier than even the Note 8.

Overall, disappointing. I'll wait for the Galaxy Tab 3 7, or a Note 7, I guess.
[Galaxy Note 10.1 General] inmnbob:
I had the same exact experience. I was ready to buy the N8 and decided to go to the store instead of buying online and glad that I did. The size was too big compared to the 7" I am used to. I will keep the Note 10.1 as my primarily device. Maybe someone will develop a 7" win8 tablet win a pen.. That would be the perfect note taking device with One Note
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] luisipr1:
I keep getting this weird screen popping up on my phone, and keeps telling me that developer mode is enabled... does someone know what's going on I flashed back to stock and still keep seing the same thing .it all happaned after I flashed synergy r259
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] pmdied:
Is it possible to use Tasker or a similar app to automatically Airplane toggle when data drops from an AOSP ROM? That is, can an app like tasker "know" when data drops and be configured to toggle it back on?
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] Jleech330:
I would like to the same thing that could be very helpful
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] hiemmer:
I'm not on AOSP but you could try: Make a profile for signal strength from 0 to 1 ( not 100% sure that these are the values needed ). Then a task that sets airplane mode to off then waits maybe 10 sec. and turns it back on.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] Epix4G:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.1 [t0ltecdma] » Jan 20

Wow thanks for this

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Xparent Blue Tapatalk 2
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] ndroid916:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.1 [t0ltecdma] » Jan 20

Muchos Thanks! downloading and testing immediately .....

9:45 am

Wouldn't boot for me either, stuck on LS screen

Sent from my Galaxy N2
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] The Rubenator:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.1 [t0ltecdma] » Jan 20

Are you kidding me, 4.2.1, we are in businesses
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] veeeyesee:
nice one, i'm definitely gonna try this out, tired of the stock feeling already
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] rwright64:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.1 [t0ltecdma] » Jan 20

Wouldn't boot for me. I'll try downloading it again.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] uofmike:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.1 [t0ltecdma] » Jan 20

I'm stuck in boot loop, I love liquid though, so hopefully it's an easy fix
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] neudof:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.1 [t0ltecdma] » Jan 20

Awesome!

Downloading now
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] flamebeats:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.1 [t0ltecdma] » Jan 20

Great!
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] boss336:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.1 [t0ltecdma] » Jan 20

Wont boot for me
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] partyman1971:
Do we need to be on LK8 to flash this or will it work on LJC?
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] KBizzle:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.1 [t0ltecdma] » Jan 20

Doesn't matter what rom you're currently on. You will need to wipe anyway. I would hold off though, it's also not booting over on the Verizon side.

Sent from my Spaceship with Tapatalk 2.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] rwright64:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.1 [t0ltecdma] » Jan 20

The file is only 105 mb. Is that kinda small?
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] dg4prez:
it is kinda small. that's the point ;)

i'm hearing that you need to factory reset after the install. the note 2 is a little wonky about transitions.

try that and report back. we had a working boot this morning with a tester so i know it does work.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] Epix4G:
not really its aosp and doesnt have gapps in it .... most are like 120 mb or somewhere in that neighborhood
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] dg4prez:
First time installing a 4.2 based AOSP ROM to your Galaxy Note 2 LTE (CDMA), or coming from another ROM:

- Read known issues ans FAQs

- Flash the latest official ClockworkMod-Recovery

- Copy GApps and Liquid ZIPs to your SDCard

- Boot into Recovery

- Flash Liquid zip from SDCard

- Flash GApps zip from SDCard

- DO A DATA WIPE / FACTORY RESET (otherwise your device will be stuck at boot)

- Reboot

- Don't restore system data using Titanium Backup!

- Restoring Apps + Data might cause problems and is not recommended, avoid it if possible!

if that works i'll add it to the OP.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] nicenice19:
I am thinking maybe this was posted for a different phone. Our phone doesn't have a function CM10.1 build to date, only 4.1.2.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] veeeyesee:
i actually factory reset but still stuck on the boot screen
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] rwright64:
Could TWRP be the problem?
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] dg4prez:
No. It was tested this morning on a device with TWRP.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] dg4prez:
did you factory reset AFTER installing? try it from scratch.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] rwright64:
I just did that. Still no luck.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] dg4prez:
it's possible that you need to odin back if the procedure isn't followed properly the first time. i'm not really sure and unfortunately can't test it.

here's the thread in question where 4.2 was originally established on this device. you will catch a bootloop unless you follow the procedure exactly.

http://xdaforums.com/show....php?t=2105917
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] partyman1971:
Edit: Am i missing where the FAQ and know issues link is?
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] dg4prez:
basically - everything that works in CM. Same device tree.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] veeeyesee:
from the link for the alpha3 cm 10.1 , the op said "

DO NOT USE 20121212 GAPPS OR YOU WILL HAVE ISSUES, USE 20121011 GAPPS."

could that have been the issue?

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2047667

---------- Post added at 12:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:40 PM ----------

Im gonna use his rom first, then dirty flash this rom and see what happens, will report back
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] rwright64:
20121212 is for 4.2. Its the right one. 20121011 is for 4.1.2
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] veeeyesee:
true!!! i'm lost then :confused:
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] tuemuch:
not booting up! following instructions to a T! what can we do? thanks for your work.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] nicenice19:
Alpha 3 is not CM10.1 it is CM10. The build is Android version 4.1.2 not 4.2.1. Big difference.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] keithkevorkian:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.1 [t0ltecdma] » Jan 20

Dumb question. .Does the s pen work with this rom
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] rwright64:
So far the rom doesn't work with this rom yet!
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] keithkevorkian:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.1 [t0ltecdma] » Jan 20

I was asking in theory. .. Thanks for responding though. Lol
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] rwright64:
You'll have to download an app from the app store for it to have any real functionality to it. But on 4.1.2 it worked well.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] keithkevorkian:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.1 [t0ltecdma] » Jan 20

Thank you
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] SantinoInc:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.1 [t0ltecdma] » Jan 20

So right now the only known issue is that it doesn't boot? Sweeeeeeet!
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] The Rubenator:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.1 [t0ltecdma] » Jan 20

There are 2 files in the download site, one that said cdma and the other with the spr like from sprint, even do it is not working for me, it says installation aborted ????
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] dg4prez:
you can't just go searching for files.

look at the subject line - t0ltecdma. that's your device. if you're gonna flash, you need to know that.

if you see a file that doesn't say t0ltecdma, it's not for you. d2spr? not yours. that's the s3 sprint variant.

t0ltecdma is the CDMA variant of the note 2, and it works for VZ and Sprint devices alike.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] tuemuch:
Why won't the rom load on our phones? do you have a solution for us?
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] dg4prez:
we're working on it. the very talented sbrissen has shed some light on the specifics of the device that should help quite a bit. i'm gonna pull the builds for now and hopefully post a new build soonish. it's tricky to dev for a device you've never held. :eek:
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] neudof:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.1 [t0ltecdma] » Jan 20

If t0ltecdma is not booting, isn't that why people were searching for another alternative?
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] dg4prez:
and you think they'll find it by using a build for another phone entirely? i mean, more power to them if it does, but that's also a potential one way ticket to brick-town.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] slick_rick:
He didnt know exactly how to build for this device which is probably why it wasnt booting. He does now after speaking with sbrissen. Give it some time.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] JBizzleFoSho:
We appreciate everything you are doing. Keep up the good work! I look forward to testing this out soon!
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] MiguelHogue:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.1 [t0ltecdma] » Jan 20

Wow

Alot of great things today :)

-TeaM VeNuM Like A Boss

-Galaxy Note II Edition
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] dg4prez:
we may need to hold off on development for this device until we can get one on the team, i'm afraid.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] dg4prez:
OK guys, a new build has been posted in the OP. thanks to Scott's help we've done a bunch of work on the build and think it will boot now.

Let us know!
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] imneveral0ne:
Flashing :D
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] rwright64:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.1 [l900] » Jan 20

Cool!
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] UCChemE05:
What app is that :cowboy:
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] Carbajal3009:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.1 [l900] » Jan 20

Didnt boot for me...grabbed the updated one from the op
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] flamebeats:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.1 [l900] » Jan 20

X2

---------- Post added at 03:37 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:33 AM ----------

Still a no go
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] JBizzleFoSho:
This boot screen looks awesome....but that's as far as I am getting. :( Almost there! I can feel it!
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] cbucz24:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.1 [l900] » Jan 20

Ok so I haven't ever asked this an I see it alllll the time...why would one require it to be factory reset after flashing?

On say twrp, what is considered a factory reset?

You mentioned that our note is picky so we should do this, is it just for 4.2 roms its that picky?

Ive not tried flashing yet, what kind of errors is everyone getting in the logcat?
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] rwright64:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.1 [l900] » Jan 20

Papyrus beta
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] Vito1217:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.1 [l900] » Jan 20

I followed directions to a tee. I only got one question. Does milk come with those boot loops. I can't get it to boot for nothing in this world.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] Carbajal3009:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.1 [l900] » Jan 20

I think we should just be patient. At least these devs are trying to put out something nice for us. No need for us to get all aggravated over a rom not booting up. Im sure these guys will get it working. :thumbup::beer:
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] imneveral0ne:
The devs are working on it. The one who started the thread fell asleep or I'm sure he would have pulled the link. Be patient fella's! Awesomeness is imminent!
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] Glewis21:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.1 [l900] » Jan 20

:)
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] cbucz24:
please remember, complainers dont help anything....i notice nobody bothered to gather the dev a logcat. :rolleyes:

this is all for free...if your not willing to contribute your time to help fix, then please remain quiet as extra lame comments just clog up threads. its obvious the rom isnt booting, so stating it 15 times isnt productive..
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] MiguelHogue:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.1 [l900] » Jan 20

Thank you!!

-TeaM VeNuM Like A Boss

-Galaxy Note II Edition
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] Patch7:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.1 [l900] » Jan 20

Is this rom going to be updated and posted?
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] modmandan:
I'm sure it will once these talented folks figure it out. Patience is a virtue!!
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] irule9000:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.1 [l900] » Jan 20

Ive heard that they may have gotten it working. I wouldnt be suprised if we got an update within a couple of days.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] lonnie23:
The link in the OP says 0 people downloaded..
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] dg4prez:
OP updated with 3.2. You guys get it first. Enjoy!
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] lonnie23:
Downloading now i'll tell you how everything goes!

---------- Post added at 02:58 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:40 AM ----------

Installed perfectly thanks !
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] Bawls:
Working here, thank you
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] Epix4G:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.2 [l900] » Jan 24

Liquid and justunbean inverted gapps you talk about sexy ....:D:D:D

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Xparent BlueTapatalk 2
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] dcaplinger76:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.2 [l900] » Jan 24

Looks great!!! Are the onscreen keys optional in the rom? Thanks
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] imneveral0ne:
Yes sir, they are.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] cbucz24:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.2 [l900] » Jan 24

Absolutely perfect man...so super smooth....

Very nice :thumbup:
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] Carbajal3009:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.2 [l900] » Jan 24

I knew patience would pay off. About to flash :D thanks for this team liquid smooth!
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] beatit327:
SD card not Mounting anyone else having this issue? Pls help
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] dcaplinger76:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.2 [l900] » Jan 24

Is MMS working for everyone? I can send but not receive.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] beatit327:
Yes it works it does for me
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] neudof:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.2 [l900] » Jan 24

Is it formated to fat32?
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] beatit327:
I'm not sure
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] Carbajal3009:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.2 [l900] » Jan 24

Not able to see my internal storage also. Created a new internal storage along the lines of emulated legacy.. ? :confused:
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] lonnie23:
Anyone mind sharing their set up?

And DPI change, if changed..
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] liemydude:
For those who got this Rom working...Were you on LK8 or LJC? Just making sure I don't mess this up. Thanks!
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] danweb66:
Well for those concerned I am on lk8 firmware. I followed the directions to a T and all I can say is wow! Everything is working great. Will test out everything tomorrow. Thank you so much for this.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] nique0201:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.2 [l900] » Jan 24

I can send but not receive MMS what's the fix????

---------- Post added at 07:43 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:41 AM ----------

Are there any over clock kernels??
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] formuk:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.2 [l900] » Jan 24

Does LTE work?

Update: Yes it does, and very well!