yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Motorola Droid RAZR] BleedingIris:
Ye, if you're rooted and have a nandroid backup

cm9 htc a310e
[Motorola Droid RAZR] t12icky0:
Ok I've tried looking around any suggestion on kernels? I didn't see hardly any in development section.
[Motorola Droid RAZR] HSD-Pilot:
AW: Custom kernel for stock ROM??

You can't flash an Kernel with an unlockable Bootloader. Maybeeeee that's the reason why there's no really Kerneldevelopement goin on :confused:

Sent from my XT910
[Motorola Droid RAZR] t12icky0:
Thanks..i was kinda wondering about that. Wasnt sure if you could or not.
[Motorola Droid RAZR] bigdee888:
But we can erase cid and bypass it. With this method we can flash kernel?

Or I thinking it wrong?
[Motorola Droid RAZR] BleedingIris:
How do you do that?

cm9 htc a310e
[Motorola Droid RAZR] t12icky0:
Was wondering the same thing..How do i do that?
[Motorola Droid RAZR] HSD-Pilot:
AW: Custom kernel for stock ROM??

Erasing the CID only allows you to flash original Moto signed Kernels (or complete Firmwares) that doesn't match with your Region (EU > CN)

This has nothing to do with the ability to flash an custom kernel.

Sent from my XT910
[Motorola Droid RAZR] bigdee888:
Okay, sorry and thanks for the clarify!
[Motorola Droid RAZR] t12icky0:
Thanks for all the info guys
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] FatalaS:
I downloaded 1 application from google play which allowed me to change screen resolution/dpi so i set my res to 150,rebooted ,and changed back to normal.After that I can't open google play,can't visit xda via chrome,can't install google play market app...Please help!!!Some pictures:

http://imageshack.us/a/img217/4480/screenshot2013012014100.png

http://imageshack.us/a/img802/9309/screenshot2013012014085.png

http://imageshack.us/a/img820/1439/screenshot2013012013520.png
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Nico_60:
Do you try to uninstal the app you've downloaded or maybe it made a backup that you can restore.
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] FatalaS:
Yes I uninistalled that app ASAP.
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] goofball2k:
did you change your dpi settings back to 213?
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] tallyforeman:
Play it safe and restore your Nandroid or wipe and reflash.
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dparrothead1:
+1
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] FatalaS:
Yes i changed back to 213.

Well...I had to restore my old backup and now going to RMA because blown speaker + 1dead pixel
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Necronhyperion:
Unistal the program change dpi to default. If you can't try factory settings from the physical buttons
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] yl88:
I have similar problem, this solution works well.
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] andre-83:
I'm getting this issue:

I got Settings.apk and framework.apk from a rom, then i opened apktool and

1) imported fw: apktool if framework.apk

2) decompiled apk: apktool d Settings.apk

3)edited a string in a xml

4) rebuilt all: apktool b Settings Settings.apk

5)pushed it into system/app

6) fix permissions and reboot.

Settings now should work, but it doesnt. Can somebody tell me where i do a mistake?

Thank you :)

(I used win8, but i could use macos or ubuntu as well)
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ej8989:
sign it first
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] andre-83:
I did it. same result. maybe the application I used is not good (Auto-Sign v0.65). what application i've to use?

I didnt write it before, however the rom is on 4.2.1 (cyanogen 10.1)
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ej8989:
put your re-complied apk to your phone's sd card and use zipsigner2 from playstore to sign it.
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] andre-83:
Nothing. Maybe this is not good for 4.2.1? (I've used it lots of times with 4.1)
[Nexus S Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] djodjoni:
Well, apktool is using smali/baksmali to compile/decompile classes.dex/apk_name.odex file.

The problem can occur when you use different baksmali version when you decompile and also not the right version to compile (as the system expects it to be). You can also experience issues if the apk is not zipaligned properly (check down who to do that)

apktool has the smali/baksmali code inside it so you will need to get the newest version for it for JB for example.

You can check why the status bar is not there when you monitor the logcat and look for DEX related logs in the beginning.

You can also use smali/baksmali on your own: http://code.google.com/p/smali/wiki/DeodexInstructions

and just place the generated classes.dex in the apk

then zipalign -f 4 filein.apk fileout.apk (http://developer.android.com/tools/help/zipalign.html)

then push back fileout.apk (sytemui.apk in your case)
[Asus Transformer TF700] airmark:
Hello,

I bought a SquareTrade warranty before unlocking the TF700, installing CROMI etc. It's been almost 3 weeks now and the device feels ok, so I'm feeling that chances are I will never actually need the warranty. I'm not that worried about accidental drops as I use it almost exclusively at home and am very careful with all my gadgets in general (I've never had a portable device break from a drop in more than 15 years of laptop/mobile phone usage). I basically got the warranty for fear of inferior quality control on this particular device leading to a hardware failure and Asus voiding the warranty after unlocking the device.

Would you say that if such a problem hasn't occured yet, it's worth canceling the SquareTrade warranty? I'm still within the 30 day cancellation period for a full refund. Or do you think that hardware failures of any kind are quite likely further own the road so it's worth keeping it? Again, I'm not talking about accidental drops or any other user errors, I'm talking about the tablet failing because of poor quality / inferior components (an example would be those black lines that appeared in the middle of a video review on a side-by-side comparison with the Samsung Galaxy Note Tab). What has your experience been, especially those that have had the device for more than a couple of months?

Thanks.
[Asus Transformer TF700] MartyHulskemper:
To start off: an insurance is just that -- it's meant more for the peace of mind than for breakdown risk (they make money off you, so that math and statistics). ;) I'd say the chances of your 700 developing a problem de novo is very slim. I've had mine since about three weeks before it went retail (no typo), and it's been doing great. I do have random reboots since I screwed around a bit too enthusiastically and the occasional black line across the screen, but that is a renderer problem and is unlikely to worsen with time (unless ASUS screw up the software part even more).

EDIT: I've only insured a digital device once -- ended up paying for an entire year and never needing anything. Pure moneymaking scheme.

TL;DR: Ditch the warranty.
[Asus Transformer TF700] sbdags:
I never insure any devices. It's a pure scam. Most manufacturers will replace if within warranty even if you unlock the Asus I know people who have had it replaced from accidental damage.
[Asus Transformer TF700] airmark:
Thanks for your responses. Just one question regarding those black lines. I'm not referring to the flashing ones that were introduced by jelly bean, but rather the permanent ones that appeared on that video review that I mentioned (I'll find the link and post it here). Any thoughts on that? It seemed like a permanent hardware failure. Is it really safe to assume that Asus would cover something like that even in an unlocked device (given that it is obviously not caused by the unlocking but is hardware related)?
[Asus Transformer TF700] MartyHulskemper:
I do not know where you are from, but here in Holland (or rather in the EU), my lawyer would string up their balls alongside the Central Station's monumental front. Hehehe. You are right in that those black lines seem to be derived from some kind of underlying (and thus permanent) hardware issue. I've never actually seen them, either in real life or on a review, although I believe you on your word that somewhere, somehow a 700 suffers from it. That doesn't really surprise me, given ASUS'track record in Q&A. :cyclops: Depending on your location and verbal proficiency, you should have close to no issues at all when RMA in the previously-granted warranty period for such reasons.
[Asus Transformer TF700] airmark:
Hehe... I actually bought it in the US and one would assume that customer service should be top notch over there, no? Anyway, this is the video I was referring to:

http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rc...=FzmPwfs__pa-kwhYKnTDxg&bvm=bv.41248874,d.d2k

Look at around 14:50 when the two horizontal lines first appear (the reviewer mentions them a few seconds later) and they stay there for the remaining if the review. This video combined with Asus voiding the warranty after unlocking is pretty much why I got that square trade warranty, as I'm this case the tablet didn't have any issues for a month of testing and reviewing until it "bit the dust right in the middle of the review" (the reviewer's words towards the end of the video).
[Asus Transformer TF700] MartyHulskemper:
I understand your concern, but whatever that may be, it's probably hardware-related. It was an early review, so I hope they sent him a preproduction model.

If they were even worse than the actual production models, it sure must have sucked balls to review them. ;)
[Asus Transformer TF700] Zeblade:
In things like this if you take someones advice and something goes wrong.. they ditch you. Unless I missed it to this day anyone with a rooted/unlocked tab that sent it in for repairs never got it back the same way. Just relocked and unrooted.

But if your device is stock then SquareTrade to me is worthless unless you got a 3y. I do read some having problems after 3w-2months. There's just to many "and by many I mean compared to other tablets" to ignore it. Now me I would not get Squaretrade unless its a 3 y then I would keep it buts this is what I..ME.. would do.
[Asus Transformer TF700] airmark:
So, does that mean that Asus would cover it? despite being unlocked?
[Asus Transformer TF700] airmark:
You mean when they sent it back to Asus? Does that mean that in a hardware failure Asus would fix it and then relock/unroot it? That's not too bad. If my tablet had a hardware failure and I can have it fixed under Asus warranty at a cost of having to re-unlock it and reinstall everything, I can live with that. What I was worried (and got the ST warranty for) is that Asus wouldn't cover anything once it's unlocked.

Why 3y? I got a 2yr as it was the best value (the 3rd year cost more than the second and by year 3 it will be obsolete anyway).
[HTC Sensation] slumberlust:
Hi Guys, I've been using KGS Utility with much success up until the last stage (trying to load a ROM).

I have S-Off and firmware 3.33 yet whatever ROM I try to install it never boots (had a few infinite reboots, and a few stuck on the tMobile l oading screen, not it's stuck on the HTC white screen

I'm currently trying this ROM http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2035591&highlight=cyanogen and have followed the instructions to format and wipe using 4ext. The phone still reliably boots into the bootloader using voldown+poweron.

Any thoughts on what I'm doing wrong? The searches I've done have all suggested double checking firmware # and make sure you're following the mod instructions (wipes, etc).
[HTC Sensation] ganeshp:
what does the botloader say ?

UNLOCKED or JUOPUNUTBEAR ?
[HTC Sensation] malybru:
Hi,

Can you post exactly what it says in your bootloader.

:)
[HTC Sensation] slumberlust:
Sure:

Firmware 3.33

PYRAMID PUT SHIP S-OFF RL

HBOOT-1.27.1100

RADIO-11.24A.3504.31_M

OpenADSP-v05.5.0.2226.00.0418

eMC-boot

Jan 13 2012, 17:33:34

HBOOT

volup

voldown

power

FASTBOOT

RECOVERY

FACTORY RESET

SIMLOCK

IMAGE CRC
[HTC Sensation] slumberlust:
I used the juopuntbear wire trick method, but I don't show that in the bootloader.
[HTC Sensation] malybru:
Hi,

Did you use the firmware from THIS THREAD

:)
[HTC Sensation] slumberlust:
Yup, the 3.33 version. Should I try it again?
[HTC Sensation] malybru:
Hi,

No.

The problem is that it just shows "Firmware 3.33"

It no longer says if you have a locked or unlocked bootloader.

:)
[HTC Sensation] ganeshp:
You have revolutionary hboot so it's fine I think..

Re flash the 4Ext recovery and flash the rom
[HTC Sensation] slumberlust:
I've tried twice now and it is getting suck while rebooting on the white HTC page. Do I need to properly wipe the 4Ext installation, as I've just been trying to install over.
[HTC Sensation] Kohr-Ah:
All I replaced was the word revolutionary :) he is soff and 1.27.1100 so at least is unlocked and s-off.

OP have you tried clearing dalvik and cache?

Sent from my Sensation in UrQuan subspace
[HTC Sensation] malybru:
Hi,

Yes.

I got that that after a bit of thought.

:)
[HTC Sensation] slumberlust:
Just tried that and the same exact boot freeze happens after a succesful flash of the rom.
[HTC Sensation] Kohr-Ah:
Try fw 3.32 see if it boots

Can always update radio through Stempox's thread afterwards

Sent from my Sensation in UrQuan subspace
[HTC Sensation] slumberlust:
Hi, tried 3.32 tonight, installed successfully (says revolution now instead of the number, as you said earlier) then did a cache clear + davik clear. Same exact issue. ROM installs successfully but on reboot it makes an odd windows noise (normally the beepboop, but this is like beep*flutter*boop) and gets stuck on the white HTC boot screen indefinitely.
[HTC Sensation] slumberlust:
I just noticed that your signature says the firmware doesn't need SuperCID, is it an issue if I put SuperCID on the phone first and then used that firmware?
[HTC Sensation] slumberlust:
I also tried 3.12 today, just to see if going way back would help. Nothing fixes it.
[HTC Sensation] ganeshp:
try turning back the cid to your original one (fastboot oem writecid xxx )..and then try to boot the phone

also try non-sense roms ...like cm9/cm10/aokp/pa/aosp roms
[HTC Sensation] slumberlust:
Hi, lampshade over at #helpmenow IRC channel helped me through it.

We checked the md5's installed 3.33 firmware and I cleared everything, including sd card this time. Worked, it booted and am now working on installing GAPPs, thanks for the help everyone, mod looks slick.
[HTC Sensation] lampshade90:
i helped you and im the king :)
[HTC Sensation] slumberlust:
Yes you did, also forgot to mention that I flashed the rom via 4EXT this time instead of KSG, not sure if that or the clean slate or the sdcard wipe fixed the issue.
[Windows Phone 8s by HTC] tutzeroone:
Hi everyone !

I've just bought an HTC 8S but it's modified by the operator (SFR France).

I would like to know if there is a way to install a "stock" rom without any modification because the operator apps are really annoying and there is no way to uninstall them. Also, the phone is SIM locked, is there a way to unlock it ?

I've found this posts which seems to be interresting, but i don't understad everything.

1-

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2053394

If i understand it right the phone is CID locked ?

Does that mean that i can't install another rom if i don't unlock it ?

2-

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2095975

I would like to know what is "interop unlock", i haven't found informations about it. May that "interop unlock" help me ?

3-

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2094384

If i understand this right, those roms are the original one provided by HTC. Can someone please help me to install them ?

Thank you very very much for your help and I apologize for my bad english.

PS : I bought this phone as a gift for my mother, she founds it beautiful. I'm used to android and that is my first WP experience, so please don't be too hard with me ;)
[Windows Phone 8s by HTC] Niddu85:
As i understod is necessary to edit the CID with the right one before flashing roms, is that correct?
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] Rakest:
Hi, I'm new user and will not let me post in the appropriate thread HD Ultimate 2.0.3 for Xperia Neo V.

I'm testing the Ultimate HD 2.0.3 rom on my Xperia Neo V and the truth is that it is very light and fast, but I have a little problem. Do not let me send anything via bluetooth, but not activate it gives me the option to send in any application. I installed the rom several times always with the same result. With other roms bluetooth working properly.

Any idea as it can be?

Thanks, and sorry for my English.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] Ghostfreak NB:
Try a Bluetooth apk from some other Rom or stock Rom and place it in system /app and give permissions

Rw--r--r
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] Rakest:
Thanks for answering, when you have a little time I try it.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] Rakest:
Hello, tucking the Bluetooth apk from stock rom functioning properly.

Thank you.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] Vatsal:
Actually he meant to extract it from uhd 2.0.3 zip only nd move to system> app nd set permissions... Nvm it worked thats important:D
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] Ghostfreak NB:
Not necessarily the same Rom!!! Could use stock Rom Bluetooth whilst you use Ics
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] Gaks:
I'm having the same problem, how do I give the permissions?
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] Samak:
Using root explorer

Press & hold bluetooth.apk

Tap on permission

Tick on RW-R-R & untick others

Reboot, done
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] aahalfredo:
try with:

firs make a backup "por si las dudas" lol

enter to cwm -mounts and storage- format cache

thats work for me
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] bane597@gmail.com:
Hello guys I have Sony Ericsson Xperia Arc S with xperia ultimate hd 2.0.3 rom and my blueooth doesn't work. Can you help me to fix this bug, please

P.S. Sorry for my English
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] manoj_nike15:
man.. u just read the posts before u ask...
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Neo, Pro] bane597@gmail.com:
I know.... but it doesn't work on arc s :(

Is there any other way to fix this bug
[Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G] Racing19969:
About LiquidSmooth

An aftermarket firmware based on the Android Open Source Project.

http://goo.im/devs/liquidsmooth

Description

We are dedicated to providing android users with smooth, stable and fast Roms. As a team we strive to support a wide variety of devices. Our main focus in these roms is speed, stability and size.

We do our best to include a vast amount of options to meet the preferences of the majority of what the users desire within optional and customizable features.

Moving forward into the future, we as a team intend to continue to provide these things and more. The aforementioned is only the core. Technology is ever changing before our eyes each and everyday.

In order to keep up with this our team not only spends a large amount of time developing Roms and enhanced features but also devotes a great deal of time to staying on top of changing technological trends.

With these changes we will continue to produce updated Roms, trying to keep up with new devices as they are released and attempt to include as many desired optional features as possible.​

This is an ALPHA release of liquidSmooth 4.2.1 Jellybean...

What works:

WiFi

Not Working:

Everything else....

Feel free to download and test... This is NOT a daily driver...

Source: https://github.com/LiquidSmooth/android

my github: https://github.com/Racing1

DOWNLOAD: http://sourceforge.net/projects/liq...uid-JB-exp-19JAN2013-175256-t769.zip/download
[Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G] ..Cory..:
First!

It's a start bro, good stuff :)
[Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G] dispozable:
Oh snap! I cant wait to try this out!
[Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G] henslo:
couldn't boot up past Samsung screen just vibrated/Samsung loop.. did clean install wiped everything then flashed. Any idea?
[Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G] Racing19969:
make sure and wipe dalvik, cache, system, data

then install...
[Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G] chinabear13:
Having the same issue.
[Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G] Racing19969:
maybe a bad upload... I will upload again and post a new link

Sorry guys, I uploaded the wrong build... new build uploading now.. will post link when done...

NEW LINK UP
[Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G] chinabear13:
It booted up fine, but when I get to the welcome/setup screen it says "Unfortunately, the process com.android.phone has stopped" after a full wipe.
[Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G] jbats:
Alpha meant for testing the only sure fire thing that works right now is wifi, read the op. If your looking for a daily driver this is not it. Need people willing to test and produce logcats if possible. Other than that make a backup in cwm and test when you can, than restore two your last good rom. I am currently testing the cm 10.1 which experiencing the same issues. Exciting
[Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G] kfontane:
Still no estimate as to when u will have a beta or a nightly for this yet?
[Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G] henslo:
I believe that question has been answered before, a few times when they get a kernel that boots with the ROM ,
[Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G] kfontane:
I understand that. What I'm trying to say or ask in this case is what do they need to help with the process and how can I do my part to make things go a lot smoother for the devs???
[Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G] jbats:
Still waiting on a new kernel, trust me they haven't quit trying.
[Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G] johnb380:
U my friend have just violated one of the biggest xda rules... NEVER ASK FOR ETAs... seriously devs hate that and it is a real xda forum rule and its rude devs do this for free and use their family time to bring us what we could only dream of otherwise... so just be considerate of all that when posting here or anywhere my friend... :D

!¡!¡!¡!¡!¡!PLEASE

click

THANKS

if

I

helped

!¡!¡!¡!¡!¡!¡!
[Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G] Racing19969:
Yes we are still working on getting a kernel.. as for a time frame ??? When we get it you will know!!!!
[Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G] mordjah:
3.6+ kernel for Blaze, how can I help?

I see the same thing repeated.. we're working on a kernel.

I would like to ask, who is working on the kernel, what are they having problems with, and what can I do to help?

I know linux, build systems (long time gentoo :eek: ) C, Java, Bash, etc etc..

I am in the beginnings of learning kernel driver development, and i own a blaze... Could someone give me a point in the right direction?

Thanks,

~Mordjah
[Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G] jbats:
Everyone here is a badace dev.lol you can DL the source, build, but... plenty smart people have been wracking there brains for sometime on this. If you want to contribute, go to Irc.free node.net and there under #cyanogenmod or #cyanogenmod-dev, you need to talk to uberpinguin are cm maintainer or you could pm dr4stic , but like I said both and others are/have been trying and havnt quit. Give em a shout if you think you can help.
[Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G] mordjah:
Lol.. Not nearly a bad ace dev.. few more years for that, I think :) What I am is intelligent and motivated.. I have been trying to understand which drivers are built in to the 3.x kernel series and which are propriatary blobs, and if those have any kind of build or config or if they statically compiled against 2x kernel headers and thats all there is to it.. then if i understand it correctly, its fighting against abi mismatches.. which may well be doomed unless the drivers are reverse engineered.. see there isnt alot of info about how this stuff is done initially by the manufacturer. I am working through the kernel dev books, and aosp and vanilla kernels.. just not sure what I need to learn to be useful. I am studying computer science with kernel/driver development as my career goal, and need to get started on a portfolio fwiw..

I will pop in on freenode, thanks for the pointer

~Mordjah
[Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G] aronianchici:
4.2

Any update with this? Not a rush, but it'd be pretty awesome to have 4.2 jellybean!
[Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G] Beastmode:
ETA's aren't acceptable

But no advancement on 4.2.x kernel so no update on this