yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] alyosha:
Hi,

I have HTC One X stock JB 4.1.1 with sense 4+. When i add new reminder in calendar(HTC) under google account it works OK and reminder rings when it is supposed. When i click on snooze it goes away but it won't remind me again. I tried everything i could think off and it still doesn't work.
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] ermizio:
HI, i have the same problem on my HTC One S. I think it's a bug of our HTC firmware...i hope they fix it as soon as possible, this is an important and basic function for a smartphone..

If you found a fix for this issue let me know.

Thanks in advance.

Regards

Maurizio
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] kotchishm:
I went to settings and disabled the HTC calendar. Do this and then download the Google Calendar app.
[Verizon Droid Charge] jco23:
http://support.verizonwireless.com/system_update/charge.html

anyone heard of this or know about it? I doubt it will be ICS/JB - probably a new kernel....
[Verizon Droid Charge] dSlice:
Hummmm..... Never say never. I'm not holding my breath though.

Sent from my AOSPA N7 controlled by Metallice's a32 Kernel.
[Verizon Droid Charge] lukegman:
I would laugh so hard...it's probably dwiths nemesis plotting...
[Verizon Droid Charge] dwitherell:
Lol ah well a reason to update I suppose :)
[Verizon Droid Charge] fryguy101:
This is for the FP5 update. Read the "Benefits" PDF.
[Verizon Droid Charge] p2kmafia:
ya, definitely a misleading webpage but that's just fp5
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] pssrycceho:
Hello everybody, sry but i'm kinda new here :)

i have few questions:

how can i directly mount sd-ext into phone memory? i used nvky-sgs3-jelly-v3 ( great rom ) in that rom it was like that but my battery life was pore so i changed it and installed a cm 7.2 based rom but i liked when it showed internal memory 780mb :)))))
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Ace King 34:
You can try link2SD app from playstore and link all your apps and their dalvik cache to sd card.

you need to have ext3 or ext4 partition on SD card though.

enjoy

;)
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] pssrycceho:
It's not the same i tried :( it still fill's phone memory
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Ace King 34:
You can try Cronmod script or other App2Sd scripts.

They work

if they don't work then you must ask in the script thread and they will help resolve your problem

but you must correctly tell them your problem which you are facing.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] pssrycceho:
Tnx Ak-47 i will try this :) with Cronmod script, but which one to use?? CronMod-A2SD/D2EXT/INT2EXT?? And when i use them to i need some other application??
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ahsansmiles:
If you have an SD-EXT Partition (usually EXT3 or EXT4 , check if your ROM supports EXT4) , use CronMod INT2EXT-EXT4 if you create EXT4 partition and CronMOD INT2EXT if you create EXT3 sd-ext partition.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] pssrycceho:
Yes i have ext4

Where can i check if my ROM suports ext4??
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ahsansmiles:
Ask your developer or see in the ROM details if it supports,most of the ROMS do, but EXT3 is good enough as well :) What really matters is the class of your card for example a class 10 card will perform much better than a class 4 and class 6 and so on :)
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] pssrycceho:
Tnx again :) you helped me a lot :)
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ahsansmiles:
Thanks through thanks button would be more good ;)
[Android Apps and Games] DIVARC GROUP:
Awesome, nice, interactive Live Wallpaper HD for your Android Device.

Our landscape helps you to feel the nature right in your office, home or travel - in anywhere.

Live and real physic shows you all features of tools which are created to simulate the power of nature.

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.divarc.fallenleaves.free

Google Play - DIVARC GROUP
[Android Apps and Games] nsmith4:
Nice live wallpaper, looks realistic and not cheap like other LWs. Just got the free one might upgrade for more options

Edit: Just purchased it, like the added options. great job
[Android Apps and Games] Cubeactive:
Looks nice!

Good job.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] n_tienloi:
I see BE2 very good. So i want mod it to view films better. But i am using rom Ultimate HD 2.0.2 with Panic kernel on xperia mini pro sk17i.

So please help me mod it to my setting or show me how to mod it?

Thanks you very much!
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] varfik3311:
Look in Apps& Theme Section. I thing there is a mod with BE2
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] n_tienloi:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2060416

I read this thread but i dont want replace my setting UI.

I only want add funtions: Clearphase and Bravia Engine 2 into my phone. That all . Please help if you can!
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] n_tienloi:
I only found: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2010727

But BE2 dont use for xperia mini pro? I tested it and dont work.

Do you have anyway to help me?
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] n_tienloi:
Please help me :(
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] Saqib Nazm:
1st download BE1 from attachment & flash in CWM. Then flash the zip by TK or manually push the files in the right directory. Do not delete any file from BE1. Also dont change the line in build.prop but add them. Let both lines remain in build.prop

ro.service.swiqi.supported=true

persist.service.swiqi.enable=1

&

ro.service.swiqi2.supported=true

persist.service.swiqi2.enable=1
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] n_tienloi:
I did like you said but nothing change in system

You look:

Sent from Hell by Xperia
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] Saqib Nazm:
I have sent you a PM describing the whole process. Hope that helps u
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] n_tienloi:
I did but not work with me.

I am using Xperia Ultimate Hd 2.0.2 with Panic Kernel Rom.

Sent from Hell by Xperia
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] n_tienloi:
Need flash AX movie and album of TK?

Sent from Hell by Xperia
[Samsung Captivate Glide] requiem_mortis:
Apologies for posting here but I'm unable to post to the [Kernel] [ICS] LiteKernel 1-21-2013 thread directly.

I am using [ROM] [ICS] LiteROM 0.9.0 - Slim - Smooth - Stable with LiteKernel-1.2.2 when I try to install the latest release of the LiteKernel - LiteKernel-4.0-20130121.zip using CWMR it hangs on bootup showing just 'SAMSUNG'

I've tried clearing cache and dalvik cache and reinstalling but to no avail. I have successfully reverted to LiteKernel-1.2.2.

Guidance on how to proceed with the latest release would be greatly appreciated.
[Samsung Captivate Glide] dudejb:
You can try the build 13 instead of the 21 see if that helps here are their links:

http://goo.im/devs/thegreatergood/LiteKernel/ICS

I linked the ICS Kernels I believe it makes a difference. Make sure you were not trying the Jelly Bean Kernel.

JB
[Samsung Captivate Glide] requiem_mortis:
Definitely have the ics one I double checked that before posting. When I was on stock 4.0.4 I tried 13 gave me problems with enabling wireless connection eventually it would come on after a while even clear memory would not allow it to start and it needed a reboot
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] crash613:
Can someone advise on the ota update.. I don't quite understand entirely boot loaders and such.. My note 2 is stock rooted. I don't think I will ever Change roms, but I want to stay rooted.

What is the verdict for someone like me? I do not want to block ota then miss other important updates, but I do not want to lose root either.

Please advise.

Again, sorry for such a basic question. I am still transistioning from iPhone world
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] EVOme:
Just block it. Sure devs will find a way to root and unlock again soon. At that point, you can restore the SDM 1.0 and get later updates if you need them.

You're sure to lose root within 5 days if you don't.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] TonikJDK:
Ok, based on what you say you don't want to rom but you want root. That is where I am. There is an app called voodoo ota rootkeeper in the play store. It is free. Install it and use it to backup root. Take the update and use voodoo to restore root.

That will get you root and a locked bootloader. Which is where I read you want to be. But remember you may be stuck with a locked bootloader forever.

That said consider this. Pass on the update for now. You can always update to it later to get the next update. By waiting you keep your options open and miss nothing.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] nixpunk:
Good advice. This is my plan as well.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] crash613:
Thank you both for the quick replies. I think that is what I am going to do. Block it for now, using titanium. Then wait and see.

I am going to look in to that other program though. Right now I feel I will always want to reman stock-rooted, but who knows... No point in closing that door forever.

Just so I have this straight..... Using titanium I backed up the sdm 1.0 file, then in the same screen I click on it and choose delete? That's it? Thanks for being patient with me.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] nixpunk:
Yes, although I believe it's "Un-install", not delete. You could freeze it as well, if you have the paid for version.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] Guitar4Him:
I have a Note 2 that was rooted using a root-injected stock OS. Unfortunately, the OTA got me this morning and I have lost root. At the following link several folks have replied that they were able to get their Note 2's rooted after the OTA. What do you guys think? I don't want to brick my phone but I sure need Root-Explorer and Titanium Backup.

http://galaxynote2root.com/galaxy-note-2-root/how-to-root-verizon-galaxy-note-2-sch-i605/
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] Guitar4Him:
I can now confirm that, if you have a rooted, stock Note II and lose root through the OTA, you can go the Odin route with a rooted stock image and successfully root the device. Additionally, if you install Voodoo OTA Rootkeeper after rooting the device, you can then, do the OTA and restore root using the Voodoo app. Instructions and files are available at:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2024207
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] droidstyle:
http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=37066564&postcount=1167
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] y8s:
I can confirm that a handy dandy combination of:

1. Deferring the update

2. Rooting via ExynosAbuse

3. Backing up root via Voodoo OTA Rootkeeper

4. Updating

will maintain root with the latest Verizon Galaxy Note 2 update.

I am now I605VRALL4and my Device Status says "Normal" since I haven't flashed anything.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] TonikJDK:
I did what you did and I am modified. I did the light sabre mod. But I don't think that would do it.

Edit......reboot and mine is back to normal.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] jayharper08:
Just wanted to clarify what the differences are between android and original development. Here are some KEY points by our very own pulser_g2.

The following are most likely “Original Development”:

*Official releases of highly original and upstream custom ROMs (built from the ground up with significant original development within them

*Official releases/development of such original ROMs, perhaps posted by the maintainer or their nominated person.

*A significant “first” in development for a device. Significant is subjective, but it is likely something which took considerable time/effort, and is generally accepted by developers to be significant and non-trivial.

*Kernels which are built with beneficial changes that are not simply pulled from other kernels already available. Some element of original work is expected.

*Tools and utilities with a clear purpose, and which are well-made, and useful to users. They should have an element of originality, either in purpose or through significant improvement in the means of operation.

*Significant port of a ROM from one device to another, giving enhanced features or functionality to users of the target device. The port should be beneficial (a port from two virtually identical devices isn’t original development, it’s winzipping, and nobody really benefits from this, as it’s not development)

The following are most likely not “Original Development”, and should be posted in the “Android Development” subforum:

*Your own “unofficial” stock build of your favourite original, source-built (or otherwise) ROM, particularly where an official or maintainer-endorsed thread exists already.

*Minor derivatives of other ROMs with little or no changes, or ROMs consisting of “placebo” features as a main constituent or claim.

*Renames or rebadges of others’ work – these don’t belong on XDA at all! Refer to rule 12 for more information.

*Reposts of existing ROMs with small changes (i.e. kitchen work, such as adding a couple of apps). If you could realistically distribute your changes as an “addon pack” above and beyond a ROM, you should do so. In addition, your “ROM” would not be original development as it would be substantially identical to the original ROM.

*A thread created with unrealistic goals that are clearly unachievable by those starting the thread. This is not intended to discourage high aspirations, rather to prevent threads porting Windows Phone 8 to the HTC Wallaby. This is pretty much common sense.

*A ROM where a main or significant claim/feature is graphical changes to the user interface (ie. Themed ROM)

You can find all the info for it here. Threads will be moved if they do not meet the "Original" development requirements. Thank you guys and have fun! :highfive:
[Android General] Mich3lin:
Hi there,

since the 4.2 have same UI for tablets and phones than previous, are you satisfied with it? I'm not sure if it's worth upgrading, because for me, it doesn't seem comfortable... When you have 10" tablet and want to probably hold it with two hands, then how you touch control buttons in middle of display? I think that it's not a good step, because tablet is tablet and phone is phone. But you know... It's only my thought, since I've never used it. So I'm asking if somebody have experiences with that..?
[Android General] sttovo:
I think everyone has their own preference. I have a 10" tablet and cannot work effectively with the buttons in the middle. Thankfully, the kind devs over at EOS have added an option to move the buttons back to the left.

In terms of having an extra bar at the top of the screen, I don't care for it. Having bars at the top and bottom eat up valuable screen real estate. So when I need a full screen, I just use another option from EOS, which is a full screen mode.

So, I've found ways to work around the things I don't like.
[Android General] Mich3lin:
yeah, I think so... Well, that's good news for me... Thanks
[Android General] spunker88:
I could see how the new UI would work okay on a 7" tablet, but on a 10" tablet like my Touchpad I prefer the classic tablet UI. Its easy to access the soft keys with my left hand and use my right hand for the notifications area and interacting with apps. I thought the whole point of the Honeycomb UI redesign was to get something that worked better on tablets than 2.x and then ICS was made to merge both UIs into one OS. Now Google is forcing a UI on tablet users that somewhat resembles the 2.x version of Android on tablets.
[Android General] Mich3lin:
Absolutely agree with you... I don't know why they messed up this. I still remember my HTC Flyer (7" tablet) on 2.3 and it wasn't clever solution... Now, things are repeating but in bigger size. Okay, maybe it's good idea to have same UI, so users will now how to use it and developers would have less work, but when it comes to reality it's annoying.
[Android General] gagdude:
Hey - that's what Paranoid Android is for! :D
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] Deeveeance:
Hey guys, I know a lot of 'inline control' questions have been asked here, but all I keep getting is links for "Media Controls" and even Lifehacker barely helps by telling me to solder the plugs for the resistors to match up or something... I don't know how to solder, and my Aviators were a gift, so I won't be getting into them anytime soon.

Isn't there a simple adapter out there for the inline controls to work?

Thanks in advance!
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] II12yanII:
I have looked around and cant find super wipe for the galaxy nexus lte version. Any help would be nice
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Zepius:
you dont need it.

wipe data/cache and then wipe system.

tada, youve done a super wipe
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] dschreiber69:
Or do that twice for a super duper wipe...

;)
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] eqjunkie829:
Here you go. Makes the wipe process much simpler.

http://db.tt/W3a5rr9K
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] beekay201:
I never wipe dalvik cache, and I only format cache when it gets done with a factory reset (when switching ROMs)

All the others, just format /system and go. And even formatting /system isn't needed most times because most ROMs already include that step in their install script.

sent from my Google Galaxy Nexus
[Hardware Hacking General] Phatrabbitt:
So I got my lucid rooted but now I can't get a recovery or a ROM to install. I've tried all I could find. All I get is the fast boot error when I try to flash a recovery or a ROM. I've got superuser and I'm not really new to the community. I've adjusted a few values in the build just trying to make it a little more buttery. Help!! I need more root powers.
[Hardware Hacking General] rbeavers:
Not sure about your phone, On most you need to unlock the Bootloader.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note II] spiff72:
Does anyone have any idea why the "Deep Sea" LWP would be using a big percentage of my battery? I actually did use it as my wallpaper for a while, but then noticed that it was showing up pretty high in the list of battery usage apps. I switched to a static wallpaper a few days ago, and noticed last night that it was still showing up in my battery usage apps. I then went into the application info for it and disabled it last night before I went to bed and charged it overnight.

Here is my usage this morning. This was with about 2 minutes of screen time.

Should I just go in with root explorer and rename/delete the file? Or do you think that this is a false positive?

Thanks!
[Samsung Epic 4G Touch] jayharper08:
Just wanted to clarify what the differences are between android and original development. Here are some KEY points by our very own pulser_g2.

The following are most likely “Original Development”:

*Official releases of highly original and upstream custom ROMs (built from the ground up with significant original development within them

*Official releases/development of such original ROMs, perhaps posted by the maintainer or their nominated person.

*A significant “first” in development for a device. Significant is subjective, but it is likely something which took considerable time/effort, and is generally accepted by developers to be significant and non-trivial.

*Kernels which are built with beneficial changes that are not simply pulled from other kernels already available. Some element of original work is expected.

*Tools and utilities with a clear purpose, and which are well-made, and useful to users. They should have an element of originality, either in purpose or through significant improvement in the means of operation.

*Significant port of a ROM from one device to another, giving enhanced features or functionality to users of the target device. The port should be beneficial (a port from two virtually identical devices isn’t original development, it’s winzipping, and nobody really benefits from this, as it’s not development)

The following are most likely not “Original Development”, and should be posted in the “Android Development” subforum:

*Your own “unofficial” stock build of your favourite original, source-built (or otherwise) ROM, particularly where an official or maintainer-endorsed thread exists already.

*Minor derivatives of other ROMs with little or no changes, or ROMs consisting of “placebo” features as a main constituent or claim.

*Renames or rebadges of others’ work – these don’t belong on XDA at all! Refer to rule 12 for more information.

*Reposts of existing ROMs with small changes (i.e. kitchen work, such as adding a couple of apps). If you could realistically distribute your changes as an “addon pack” above and beyond a ROM, you should do so. In addition, your “ROM” would not be original development as it would be substantially identical to the original ROM.

*A thread created with unrealistic goals that are clearly unachievable by those starting the thread. This is not intended to discourage high aspirations, rather to prevent threads porting Windows Phone 8 to the HTC Wallaby. This is pretty much common sense.

*A ROM where a main or significant claim/feature is graphical changes to the user interface (ie. Themed ROM)

You can find all the info for it here. Threads will be moved if they do not meet the "Original" development requirements. Thank you guys and have fun! :highfive:
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] jayharper08:
Just wanted to clarify what the differences are between android and original development. Here are some KEY points by our very own pulser_g2.

The following are most likely “Original Development”:

*Official releases of highly original and upstream custom ROMs (built from the ground up with significant original development within them

*Official releases/development of such original ROMs, perhaps posted by the maintainer or their nominated person.

*A significant “first” in development for a device. Significant is subjective, but it is likely something which took considerable time/effort, and is generally accepted by developers to be significant and non-trivial.

*Kernels which are built with beneficial changes that are not simply pulled from other kernels already available. Some element of original work is expected.

*Tools and utilities with a clear purpose, and which are well-made, and useful to users. They should have an element of originality, either in purpose or through significant improvement in the means of operation.

*Significant port of a ROM from one device to another, giving enhanced features or functionality to users of the target device. The port should be beneficial (a port from two virtually identical devices isn’t original development, it’s winzipping, and nobody really benefits from this, as it’s not development)

The following are most likely not “Original Development”, and should be posted in the “Android Development” subforum:

*Your own “unofficial” stock build of your favourite original, source-built (or otherwise) ROM, particularly where an official or maintainer-endorsed thread exists already.

*Minor derivatives of other ROMs with little or no changes, or ROMs consisting of “placebo” features as a main constituent or claim.

*Renames or rebadges of others’ work – these don’t belong on XDA at all! Refer to rule 12 for more information.

*Reposts of existing ROMs with small changes (i.e. kitchen work, such as adding a couple of apps). If you could realistically distribute your changes as an “addon pack” above and beyond a ROM, you should do so. In addition, your “ROM” would not be original development as it would be substantially identical to the original ROM.

*A thread created with unrealistic goals that are clearly unachievable by those starting the thread. This is not intended to discourage high aspirations, rather to prevent threads porting Windows Phone 8 to the HTC Wallaby. This is pretty much common sense.

*A ROM where a main or significant claim/feature is graphical changes to the user interface (ie. Themed ROM)

You can find all the info for it here. Threads will be moved if they do not meet the "Original" development requirements. Thank you guys and have fun! :highfive: