yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] The Pinhead:
Same thing here. Had the same prob with the alarm too. Never had an SOD until I install v29.2. Also noticed that all CPU test scores are lower. Went back to V23 and all is fixed.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] simplymiko:
Same thing here. Flashed back to 28 for the time being.

Sent from my awesome phone
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] jaaluk:
As a matter of fact it was a mod that prevent screen wake when I plug and unplug my charger. Once I took that off it stopped.

SeNt FRoM oVeR THeRe-----> GALAXY note2 FaR FaR aWaY!!!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ptmr3:
Wow im sorry to hear that!!! What version of the kernel? I have heard of 1 or 2 people having cpu spike and stay but was fixed with data wipe. What all came of your issue?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ptmr3:
Guys the cpu tables are identical. The only mod to the freq sertings was the extra low cpu steps. As lomg as you are keeping at stock voltages you wont have any issues. Like I have said before, if your chip can't UC, dont do it its as simple as that.

If you are staying stock voltages and no lower than 200 cpu it is the same as running saber 28 with a Linux version upgrade
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ptmr3:
My results from the last couple days running 140-1920. Not too damn bad lol
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] BigBake88:
PT, what did you set your GPU to? And running stock voltages?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] perrybal:
Can someone post the version 28
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] crixley:
sod has nothing to do with the kernel? LOL

Ok then.....Typically it has everything to do with the kernel (many time voltage settings)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] jaaluk:
Negative! """""IMO"""""!!!!!!!!

My fix was unistalling a mod! Had nothing to do with the kernal this kernal or the last 3, 4 or 5 I flashed before this kernal! It was a mod!!!!

Read sir...""""IMO""""

SeNt FRoM oVeR THeRe-----> GALAXY note2 FaR FaR aWaY!!!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] crixley:
Well as you can see others are having the issue and it is fixed by reverting to an earlier version..

Hard to say it has nothing to do with it when the common denominator is the kernel version
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] jaaluk:
It's the same as saber 28 with the exception of UC. how bout don't UC leave it alone. That would be the same as reverting to an earlier kernal. Or how bout find another kernal all together. I have been running saber kernal since my first flash and haven't had half the problems I hear about in this thread. Take some personal responsibility and "Flash at your own risk" all these complaints. Do some trouble shooting and not blame it on the last thing you flashed $#!*

SeNt FRoM oVeR THeRe-----> GALAXY note2 FaR FaR aWaY!!!

---------- Post added at 07:17 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:13 PM ----------

19 reverting to 17, 23 to 19 25 to 23, 28 to 25, 29 to 28...where does this train stop???

SeNt FRoM oVeR THeRe-----> GALAXY note2 FaR FaR aWaY!!!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] crixley:
Somebody pee in your corn flakes?

How do you know everyone with the issue is underclocking?

Someone needs to chill out and stop being such a fan boy I think

---------- Post added at 01:21 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:20 AM ----------

This is a development thread, people are allowed to post issues without being chastised if they are having any
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] jaaluk:
You're right! I would appreciate you not calling me names! Thanks

SeNt FRoM oVeR THeRe-----> GALAXY note2 FaR FaR aWaY!!!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] crixley:
You're the one spazzing out because people had an issue you didn't and trying to blame it on everyone
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] jaaluk:
Uc or uv are the main common denominators. Everyone trying to get 2 days worth of battery life on one charge, Why.......??? What's the point?

SeNt FRoM oVeR THeRe-----> GALAXY note2 FaR FaR aWaY!!!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] crixley:
Once again how do you know what everyone is doing?

They stated they changed nothing but the kernel version...

---------- Post added at 01:29 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:27 AM ----------

Anyhow done with the thread derail, if you feel the need to argue further take it to pm
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] jaaluk:
Lol...kool! :cool:

SeNt FRoM oVeR THeRe-----> GALAXY note2 FaR FaR aWaY!!!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] gregsarg:
Version 29...

The device fails to mount system/recovery/data....

Pretty much dead stick really...but hey..

I know the risks playing at the root level...and accept those risks to gain far more in benefits...

You have my respect, and my future commitment in support of your fine work Sir...

I purchased a refurbished device, and am typing this reply with it now...and once I have tested it for proper function...I'll be loading up this kernel again...

I wish the device could at least produce a log leading up to the failure...but unfortunately it's a brick...

Now...enough mourning about hardware...

I'm prepping for root and flash of your amazing work....

Again....not your fault...

And I thank you for all you do for us...g
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ludester:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_9.6 |3.0.58| 1|28

Awesome release. Check out the battery life so far.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] rsalan:
I was a Perseus fanboy until I stumbled upon Saber. I must say that I have converted. Scrolling is noticeably smoother and battery life is still amazing. I've been missing out this whole time!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ahmarchi:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_9.6 |3.0.58| 1|28

Stweaks support would be awesome. I love the audio and gpu tabs
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ViciousMo:
I know!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] onecrzyasian:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_9.6 |3.0.58| 1|28

Hmm for some reason my battery life is a lot worst after flashing this kernel. Any ideas?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] g3minII:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_9.6 |3.0.58| 1|28

Give it some time
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ahmarchi:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_9.6 |3.0.58| 1|28

Anyone have a big with uv... Every stretto changes except the final 3 at the bottom. .. using setcpu. 200.300.400 steps do not get changed.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] onecrzyasian:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_9.6 |3.0.58| 1|28

What do you mean?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] rockinandroid:
Not sure if anyone would know but on the peresus kernel someone developed a 5g zip for voltages and such....does anyone know if that will work with this kernel? Thanks...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] jdc5:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_9.6 |3.0.58| 1|28

Would you mind showing me a screen shot of your adjustments on voltage?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] rgoyena:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_9.6 |3.0.58| 1|28

To settle
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] rsalan:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_9.6 |3.0.58| 1|28

I seem to be having this issue..
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Alucardis666:
Loving this kernel, first time flasher. feels much smoother than the stock kernel. Also running the latest release here paired with CleanRom's latest release... using Voltage Control Extreme to pump this bad boy up to 1.8Ghz with a nice OC/UV profile I made up. Should prove pretty stable and hopefully give me better performance and battery than the stock setup.

Thanks again, I'll post back my findings.

Try using Voltage Control instead of setcpu
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] rockinandroid:
yes what are some good voltage and governor tweaks for this kernel? does anyone have any suggestions? thanks alot for anyones help..
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] gordec:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_9.6 |3.0.58| 1|28

Thinking about trying Saber coming from Persus. Anyone know if simply flashing Saber will remove all traces of Persus? I don't think there is a wipe kernel option in any recovery.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ptmr3:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_9.6 |3.0.58| 1|28

Nope the flashing process removws the previous kernel
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] rsalan:
On voltage control, the minimum voltage that I can set is 850mV.. is this normal?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] borijess:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_9.6 |3.0.58| 1|28

So are the voltage set be default wrong. If I decide to use this kernal and not do anything to it am I ok with the voltages?

Sent from the TermiNOTEr 2! ;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ptmr3:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_9.6 |3.0.58| 1|28

Guys guys guys... don't touch the voltages!!!! Lol everyone seems to think that under volting saves battery when in fact it stresses your system due to the lack of energy to carry out tasks making it work harder to do so, in turn causing the process to take a toll on performace! The voltages are set to be optimal in terms of being conservative while maintaining adequate power to not starve the processor when attempting to run at certain frequencies. Moral of the story... let the kernel do its thing lol
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] willzilla:
Lol.

Much like an underpowered car struggling to chug along burning extra gas just to move from point A to B :D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] twanskys204:
Yes ptmr3 u are a legendary developer!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] G7Baker:
I can comfirm I that I had to do a battery pull after switching back to 200 from 160. So I let my phone reboot and settle over night and after my scrren was on over an hour. My screen went black again. So this morning I reverted back to Saber 28 and havent had a problem since.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] benji667:
I have been uc as low as available and havent had problem since clean flash of x14 and 29.2 together...

Jedi X Rom and Saberkernal of course ;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] jaaluk:
+1

SeNt FRoM oVeR THeRe-----> GALAXY note2 FaR FaR aWaY!!!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] simplymiko:
+1

Back on 28 and even UV'ed on this version vs stock on 29.2. No problems here with 28. I haven't troubleshoot in depth. I just know the only thing that has changed from no SOD to SOD and back to no SOD was the kernel version.

Sent from my awesome phone
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] perrybal:
Please somebody post the version 28
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] kevinthemilkdud:
Exactly what I did- Perfect again!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] perrybal:
Version 28 please
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] jaaluk:
...

SeNt FRoM oVeR THeRe-----> GALAXY note2 FaR FaR aWaY!!!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] benji667:
Ur gonna get ppl mad doing that....just saying

Jedi X Rom and Saberkernal of course ;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] crixley:
Don't say that you'll anger the fan boys
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] jaaluk:
Is anyone running Jedi X Rom having this issue?

SeNt FRoM oVeR THeRe-----> GALAXY note2 FaR FaR aWaY!!!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] cnckck58:
Been running this kernal with jedi x rom for 2 days now with no problems.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] kevinthemilkdud:
View attachment 2063862
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] jaaluk:
I UC 140 as soon as I flashed this kernal and haven't had any issues. JEDIXP14 Saberkernal_29. Thanks ptmr3!

SeNt FRoM oVeR THeRe-----> GALAXY note2 FaR FaR aWaY!!!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ptmr3:
Ok guys with all of thw issues I will be making 2 different kernel versions one with uc and one without but as was stated many times. The only changes to cou was the extra uc steps. If you stay at stock steps you wont have issues (if your chip is dying at lower freq)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] jaaluk:
Thank you!!!!!!

SeNt FRoM oVeR THeRe-----> GALAXY note2 FaR FaR aWaY!!!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ShadowVlican:
Finally crashed with 140..now set to 160..see how that works... If not, back to good old 200
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] borijess:
I have been using 140 since it came out. No issues so far.

Sent from the TermiNOTEr 2! ;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] benji667:
+1

Jedi X Rom and Saberkernal of course ;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] psycho4us4:
+1uv +1oc. Since the morning it came out. I have good battery life and everything is very snappy. Thanks ptmr3 and anyone else who took part in this

---------- Post added at 11:57 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:52 AM ----------
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] wizzler1:
+1
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ptmr3:
What settings
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] BigBake88:
PT, to save yourself some work just put in the OP that if you have issues uc to 140 bump it to 200 min and you'll be all set. If people don't understand this then they shouldn't be flashing things on their $700 device!:D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] gregsarg:
And what control app....g
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] G7Baker:
Well. That's the issue. After reverting back to 200. I still had random blackouts. I believe a few of us have the same issue. So No bumping it back up to 200 didnt help. I also tested the kernel on a rom other than Jedi and same results. So reverting back to Saber 28 was the only fix for me..
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] DCOCH13:
Mine crashed at 140. Went back to 200 and haven't had any issues since.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] william1974:
Can I flash this kernel on n7105 international device? What's the diff between these 2 devices?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ShadowVlican:
I'm sure it was just a freak crash but my settings were:

140 uc

1920 oc

Zen

Everything else default

Set by trickster mod, latest jedi rom

I'm now using 160 uc
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] benji667:
Ppl ur uc may work just lower ur oc from 1920 to 1800 ...thats what a friend if mine did and he had no probs after

Jedi X Rom and Saberkernal of course ;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] djbrian52:
Can someone with a good set up get me a md5 sum? I'm just wondering if I got a bad download. Thx

Sent from my Note II...where BIGGER is better!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] DCOCH13:
I don't oc to 1920. I run at 1600 and still crashed at 140 uc. I get great battery and everything runs smooth at 200 and 1600. Just thought I would give 140 a try and my phone didn't like it. And it's not the end of the world to me that it didn't.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ptmr3:
Md5 is available on the host site
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] borijess:
I usually dont like using any other kernal besides stock. But this kernal is just so damn sweet.

Sent from the TermiNOTEr 2! ;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] djbrian52:
It figures. I'm at work and totally missed. Thanks again for the great work.

Sent from my Note II...where BIGGER is better!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Sqb:
Drop it drop it drop it low! Dang all the way down to 120! Like having a captivate again. Thank you so much for all your hard work.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] BigBake88:
Glad I could bring you to the triple digit thanks mark LOL. Can't wait to flash this bad boy later. :thumbup:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] shaolin95:
Indeed...my beloved Captivate...my first android phone! :D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] BigBake88:
The question now is....can PT get 100Mhz to be stable...:cool: :cowboy:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] metalmenance:
kernals are great but does anyone else notice speakerphone other person cannot hear me?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] 9wire:
I had the same issue with the cpu spike, but I carry my phone in a holster and caught it when it got hot, tried various things, and nothing worked, would work fine, then at some point either 2 or 4 cores would stick at max. BUT, this was with both Sabre and Perseus, the only common demoninator being system tuner. I restored an old version of a different rom and old kernel, and no issues so far. I like system tuner because I can see what all 4 cores are doing, I couldn't find another app that does that in quite the same way. To reiterate, I can't find anything that indicates a kernel issue, I'll be giving the new build a spin.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] srkoza:
im pretty sure trickster does, the one that comes with jedi
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] wizzler1:
Yup.

New uv kernel working like a charm once again! Thank you!!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] gregsarg:
Now running cleanrom SE 3.0 and saber 30.2

Same setup as before. ..

No issues. ..and some damn nice battery life. ..g

---------- Post added at 08:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:52 PM ----------

Had a feeling that system tuner was the weak link in the chain...and now we know. .

System tuner ate my phone. ..

Oh well. ..easy come. .easy go in the modding world. ..

I just knew it wasn't the kernel. ..

And again. .Thank you ptmr...for the best kernel out there. ..g
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] BigBake88:
The new Pegq tunables, at least for me, aren't working so well. Scrolling in certain apps are no longer smooth. Certain games now lag and stutter. I know its the tunables because I've noticed it spends a lot more time between the 120-400 range. The cpu is not scaling very well and I prefer the old pegq. Anyone else notice this?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] gregsarg:
Haven't played enough to know just yet. ..but I'll check it out too...g
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] 9wire:
AHHHH!!

With Trickster Mod...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ptmr3:
Something is spiking your cpu in your data partition. Wipe data
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] G7Baker:
Hey PTMR3 thanks once more for your awesome work. I DL both for **** and giggles and flashed 30.3 first and had the same SOD issues. Whats funny is even after changing UC 160 to 200 I still get SOD. But once I flash the 30.2 no UC and I have no issues. No SOD snd awesome performance
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] 9wire:
I changed from interactive and no more issues so far. I dunno. Can't say it's kernel related, since it happened before, different rom, and both this and perseus.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] gregsarg:
Be careful...

This is what killed my last device...

Overheat and emmc death...g
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] juancarlos5:
Work great here [MENTION=512813]120[/MENTION]mhz with uv

Thanks for the update
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] FireBird_89:
Tried going back to saber, still having draining issue with android process "system". Flashing perseus and had no problems but the moment I go back to saber it is constant drain. What could possibly be causing this.

Testing 30.3, settings set via trickster mod, and min freq and max freq set to 200 and 1600. If there is some way to troubleshoot this, I would love the help. I've attached a few screen shot that might help

Sent from my SGH-I317M
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] benji667:
on the kernal before this latest one i had to b set at 140 - 1800... this one i tried 120- 11920 again and sod.. then did 140-1800 and sod...:( ... odd... i dont mean to sound like im complaining just saying my situation that arose just this morning
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] angieri918:
+1
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ShadowVlican:
Yeap.. Currently using 30.2

Will report if i get crashes
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ptmr3:
Guys consider the UC versions experimental and at your own risk. Please no more reports of Sod unless someone asks about or you are using the non uc version. If sods hapoen on the base no uc version I have problems, if not, please just switch to tye base version and take it as your phone dont likey lol
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] psycho4us4:
Thanks tired of reading about it too
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] djbrian52:
Good day ptmr3. I agree that the conversation about sod has gotten stale. It's understood that not all chips can handle the uc(mine being one of them). The question that has been raised and maybe missed is, why after having a sod while uc'd, they continue even after changing frequencies back to stock values and requires flashing another kernel? Thanks for your hard work. It's much appreciated.

Sent from my Note II...where BIGGER is better!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] jookdakang23:
Well said brother. I was in the process of developing and ROM and kernel but hell ptmr3's work is so perfect I reconsidered lol. Good work bro. Also with the new UC kernel set to 120mhz & both GPU and CPU undervolted by 100 across the board I have gotten my all time high screen on 11 hours 27 minutes with 1 day 7 hours 31 minutes battery life. :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ptmr3:
The reason I put out obe with stock freq and one able to UC is it seems that it was messing with the scaling of the freq or maybe the govs as they were set for a higher min. I have been workimg woth the govs at compile as well as the dividers as to provide universal stability. I have a new uc version in testing and am using a few who could not uc witbout issues to see how it goes.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ptmr3:
Rihht on that is great!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] psycho4us4:
Cool themselves for the knowledge
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] jookdakang23:
And I was never the one to get anything over 4 on any phone I have had im enjoying this.

---------- Post added at 04:05 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:02 PM ----------

Not to step on anyones toes but would you guys mind if I start theming for this rom. I have been craving a black and white theme for some time
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] chris.l.naish:
+1. Honestly, that's why even if I was eligible for an upgrade right now, I can't imagine moving away from the Note 2. I had an HTC Inspire 4G before this, and battery life on the Note 2 is just so awesome by way of comparison. This kernel gives me the added benefit of Voodoo Sound too, which I now swear by. I'm at the point now where I simply won't even try a kernel that doesn't support it.

Nice job, ptmr3. :D

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] djbrian52:
I'm one of those. May I test also?

Sent from my Note II...where BIGGER is better!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ptmr3:
Go for it man
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ptmr3:
Thanks man glad to hear it!:)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ptmr3:
I have it covered for now thabks man
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Phaze1585:
Saberkernel UC

Question! Whats makes this kernel so unpredictable? Is it any better than 30.2? What features does UC have that the 30.2 doesnt? I know im asking a lot of questions, but yea, I wanna be thorough.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ptmr3:
Under clocking. Allows the low freq to go to 120 instead of 200 for extended battery life while doing simple tasks that do not take much cpu
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ptmr3:
Ok so far so good. This is an experimental test... it might eat all your cookies http://d-h.st/WOK
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] sling:
It running fine here at 120000
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] juancarlos5:
the UC version is 30.2 or 30.3?

in my note display 30.2

now test v31

post results later
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] BigBake88:
Thanks, PT. Letting 31 settle in. Running 120 nicely so far. Will report back. :thumbup: :beer:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] sshafranko:
Coming from Perseus trying this now.

Thanks be to XDA

---------- Post added at 09:14 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:28 AM ----------

So far good. Neefs time to settle in for sure but feels a bit smoother and less laggier than Pers. Also this kernel doesnt support STweaks so hiw is everyone adjusting oc uc etc.?

Thanks be to XDA

---------- Post added at 09:22 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:14 AM ----------

Never mind read thread and set cpu seems to be the app of choice. Thanx

Thanks be to XDA
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] gregsarg:
Correct...

Setcpu is the one...

No system tuner...

It sets the cores to max without warning...g
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] angieri918:
Try Trickster Mod. That's actually designed to work seamlessly with this kernel.

---------- Post added at 10:49 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:47 AM ----------

pt this is freakin awesome! So far no Sod and my phone is running crazy smooth! Oh and I'm s only at 96% battery life since 7am this morning! Awesome work as usual

Oh and I might add that the other UC versions were causing SOD for my phone but this one is nice at 120-1920 :D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] killerdvd:
I have been running the 30.3 uc version for a couple of days and so far so good. I only once got SOD and my battery was at 5% and I was running multiwindow. Otherwise this kernel is smooth. I'm about to test 31 and I'll come and post results. Great job ptmr3.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] sshafranko:
Where would i find Trickster mod. Search in Taptalk stinks.

Thanks be to XDA