yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[EVO 4G General] Papa Smurf151:
Jamie and rope r my teammates so a thread about them constitutes me being "allowed" to make a comment. Also just because I am a mod does not mean I'm not able to join into a conversation. As for the nut comment that was a joke brought on by Jamie's earlier comment. I meant no insult in any thing I said.

Also please do not Facebook msg me or contact me outside of xda please as any conversation we have between us needs to be made on xda strictly. Any other means of contacting me are reserved for family and friends and are deemed private in my eyes.

XDA Moderator
[EVO 4G General] -EViL-KoNCEPTz-:
He can message me outside of xda so I can tell him what I really think of his petty childishness, since if I did it here I'd be permabanned faster than he could count his toes.

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Xparent ICS Tapatalk 2
[EVO 4G General] jrollercoasters:
Dear everyone: please stop talking **** and putting drama on this thread thats not why I made this thread, so if your just going to contradict this thread cause your jealous of an amazing dev stfu and gtfo
[EVO 4G General] oodork123:
I did this last year when Ropedope got banned. This might work again. But i will be pleased if both of them get unbanned.
[EVO 4G General] HipKat:
I guess I missed the part where I said anything about "his last nut" whatever that was supposed to mean or referred to him at all. Saying I had a different experience with the guy may open up your little minds to interpretation, but I didn't detail anything about it, so there's nothing negative, other than what you want to perceive, and once I said I was bowing out there was no reason to refer to me other than to bait me into retorting and starting a full blown argument on here.

Oh, and I did bow out, until I got PM'd on my FB by three people about the comment. Not the time of his comment and my reply.

You mean THIS message?? OK, let's keep it on here then

"f I'm saying something about Jamie, good or bad, why do you feel the need to come into the thread and try to bait me into commenting after I said I was bowing out, making an insult that shouldn't be coming from a Mod and generally trying to start something?

As far as my feelings about Jamie, feel free to ask him to share the PM I sent him"

Either way, have fun with your thread, please don't refer to me in it again, you can feel free to PM me if you have anything to say about it. I'll be more than happy to talk in PM

Thank you
[EVO 4G General] the.emilio:
First and foremost... I am just a user like everyone else on here. I have kitchen together a couple of roms, but when it comes down to it I am just as much a noob as the guy that is currently creeping for the last 9 months cuz he don't want to get flamed for posting something that would make a face palm moment.

Papa has every right to post his opinion as a member of LOTK. If you've seen the talk on Twitter, although kind of funny at times, the integrity of the team is called out. As a user I see nothing wrong with a mod that is associated with a group state his stance in this. Although he was not called out directly, there were some general references to LOTK being a hack in a way or another.

The reputation of Jamie, Ropodope, Papa and Kendall was called out. From my standpoint, outside of their roms, as a user, they have contributed greatly to this EVO community by sharing their experiences as much as i, hip, Mazda, mbq, evo4gnoob, deck, drew, tommy... The list goes on... Sorry if I missed some LOL.

Point is although some have different point of views, in the end all we are trying to do is make this damn old device that is a POS in todays standards still relevant. From source or not, some of these roms pushed out as of late have been pretty nice. Never thought I would be running a jellybean Rom that can be considered a daily driver but hey we are right?

I'm sure someone will retort to my post, but hey that's what we do here in the EVO 4G community. And to those I say right back at ya buddy, thanks for your opinion and thanks for contributing to this WWE drama of a device. Without you this section would be as boring as a thread for the Moto Cliq.
[EVO 4G General] jrollercoasters:
Op update for rope too, when I first made this thread I didn't reliaze he was banned
[EVO 4G General] jrollercoasters:
Your running jb as a daily??? everything working?
[EVO 4G General] the.emilio:
Not right now. But for what I need the current builds provide.
[EVO 4G General] jrollercoasters:
Oh ok gotcha im content on gingerbread.. kinda a big reloaded fan haha
[EVO 4G General] Papa Smurf151:
IM closing this thread to stop the drama and issues. If you wish to continue on twitter or what not go ahead but lets not continue it here any longer.
[Nexus 4 Accessories] Jaxidian:
Was checking out eBay cases and found this gem.

I'm not associated with this seller/auction, HOWEVER, I have purchased this exact case (but in all black) from this specific seller and can recommend both. It's a three-piece case with silicone in the middle and a hard (but slightly grippy still) front/back that snap together. I think this is really the most protective case available so far for the Nexus 4. And unlike many other cases that snap, this one makes me feel a bit more confident that the small plastic pieces aren't going to break like they do on so many cheap cases. That said, I've only had this case for a week, so we'll see...

The cutouts are perfect, buttons feel great, and if I were going to drop my phone or knock it off of the table, I'd really be hoping I have this case on it when I do! Ultimately, I got this as my going-to-the-gym case, otherwise I use a Meifeng. But it is a beast of a case - don't get this to be anything but a beast, and a mug o' beer, of course!

If you want to search for the other designs for this case, search for "e960 case tuff" (no quotes) on eBay.

Also, I *am* able to charge my phone on the LG Qi pad with this case on. It must be *perfectly* placed but it charges just fine then. If you take the back hard plastic piece off, then you can move it around much more.
[Nexus 4 Accessories] zhuozhi211:
"Oh Yeah! Time for a Beer!"
[Nexus 4 Accessories] galaxys:
LOL... Might lose it in a night club or at a bar! :D
[Nexus 4 Accessories] kpjimmy:
Only if we knew if it fit any of the Seidio holsters active or surface, I'd be all over this like white on rice (don't worry, I'm Asian lol)
[Nexus 4 Accessories] PJBeast:
That case looks awesome! :D

Could you post some pictures of how it fits onto the phone? :)
[Nexus 4 Accessories] lonelysheep:
Interesting.:laugh:
[Nexus 4 Accessories] Lownita:
Found this on ebay yesterday, really like the case and am going to buy it! I thought of getting the beer style, but as I will take this case with me on drinking nights, I advised myself not to buy the beer style, because I might be raising my phone instead of my glass occasionally!
[Nexus 4 Accessories] Jaxidian:
It wouldn't take you long to realize your mistake...
[Nexus 4 Accessories] guapinoy:
Just received the white black version of this case. Its actually pretty nice. It feels good in hand and looks like it would protect the phone pretty well.

The only cons are, it has a weird smell, pretty strong plastic smell and also proximity sensor doesn't work too well, like for it doesn't work for phone calls.

FYI

So back to the Poetic Bumper
[Nexus 4 Accessories] Jaxidian:
Odd, I have no prox sensor issues...
[Nexus 4 Accessories] jnewman1991:
Do they offer it in darker colors?
[Nexus 4 Accessories] Jaxidian:
With the beer, no. But in solid colors, yes. As I stated, I own the solid black version.

Sent from my Nexus 4
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Stanley304:
Please delete
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] alinolaw71:
hi.boys:laugh:i need your helps.how chang color status bar on xperia ray with android 4?????
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] blackguy101:
So of now im using the latest baked rom and I think it is doing good so far. My only issue is that after taking 1 picture the camera messes up and the only way to fix it is to reboot my camera every time. This can get pretty annoying so i was wondering if it was at all possible to just install a tw camera and gallary with this rom or any aosp 4.2 build in general?
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] x714x:
Nope. Touchwiz needs touchwiz to run properly in a nutshell. There are many options you can try from the play store though.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] jdubsss:
I'm using baked and have no problems with the camera... did you try reflashing ?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] AlonB.:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel |3.0.31| 1|21

Well hello there ;)

(first!)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ceo.mtcl:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel |3.0.31| 1|21

Will try it.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] VanYul:
Best kernel. Thanks!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Pete7ate:
Wow this is impressive！
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ptmr3:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel |3.0.31| 1|21

Thanks guys. Let me know what you think
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Kmanblazzer:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel |3.0.31| 1|21

So I really love Jedi ROM so thank you, but my external sd won't mount. I know it says on the ROM page that I need to flash a new ROM but wouldn't flashing this ROM work? Someone help, yes I am using a 64gb. Do I just go back to Perseus?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ptmr3:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel |3.0.31| 1|21

Format your sd to fat32 :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Kmanblazzer:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel |3.0.31| 1|21

Thanks, now let me just research how to then ill be off to loving this thing!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] twanskys204:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel |3.0.31| 1|21

Thank u so much :beer:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] wase4711:
any reason to flash this over the latest version of Jedi rom? It appears that the rom comes with version 7+, and this is version 8.4...

thanks for all of this!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] rgoyena:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel |3.0.31| 1|21

Wondering too....
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] PhoneLine:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel |3.0.31| 1|21

Yes....its newer.... lol :)

That was just my logic. I flashed it and it's working fine so far.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ptmr3:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel |3.0.31| 1|21

Newer is better. 8 adds to speed and power management
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] yankeesfan714:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel |3.0.31| 1|21

Did you install this over xp9? Your thoughts?

sent from my att note II running 4.1.2 jedi xp 9

@yankeesfan714
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] wase4711:
dude, did you even look at the post ABOVE yours???????????:silly::silly::confused::confused:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] yankeesfan714:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel |3.0.31| 1|21

They dont mention xp9 by name do they? Nothing better to do huh?

sent from my att note II running 4.1.2 jedi xp 9

@yankeesfan714

---------- Post added at 01:40 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:38 PM ----------

As a matter of fact look back at all 17 posts. Not one mention xp9 by name wise guy.

sent from my att note II running 4.1.2 jedi xp 9

@yankeesfan714
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] wase4711:
if you didn't understand the post above yours, from the DEV of the Jedi rom, then you shouldn't be flashing stuff to your phone...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] yankeesfan714:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel |3.0.31| 1|21

Maybe im just making sure nobody has had issues,Did you flash it yourself?

sent from my att note II running 4.1.2 jedi xp 9

@yankeesfan714
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] yankeesfan714:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel |3.0.31| 1|21

This is running flawlessly. Thank you. And no thanks to that guy^^^^

sent from my att note II running 4.1.2 jedi xp 9

@yankeesfan714
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Jbluedodge:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_11.6 ||3.0.61||OC-1900mhz|| *2|4

I don't know if it's the kernel or rom, but I've been using the same rom for a while and never had the problem until I updated the kernel. The problem I'm having though is my bluetooth will not auto connect anymore, I have to manually pair every time now to my car bluetooth.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] rockinandroid:
Flash other kernel thats been working and see if it still works...if so then could be bad download...redownload this kernel and flash again...if not..try older version...... ...process of elimination...at least thats how i would approach it....
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Jbluedodge:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_11.6 ||3.0.61||OC-1900mhz|| *2|4

Have you tried bluetooth with the new update, just curious if it's only doing it to me...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] rockinandroid:
Yes, bluetooth works fine for me with the new updates!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] shaolin95:
Benchmarks often go hand in hand with real life improvements as long as all of them are improving.

At least numbers are more reliable than the usual "it feels so smooth" comment which is often just simple placebo.

I do have several apps that show me real life improvements as well of course.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] willl03:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_11.6 ||3.0.61||OC-1900mhz|| *2|4

Lol yeah kernel placebo, during my year with the galaxy nexus I was using Franco kernel nightlies, he must have released a hundred of them and on the forums very most of them were "smoother and better battery" than the previous. If that was true our GNex would have ended smoother than this Note II and it's terrible battery giving 10h screen on time, lol

Although this kernel did bring the phone from 75% to 90% smooth, and screen on time from 2.5h to 3.5h daily. His benchmark numbers were lower than other kernels focusing on this but definitely provided the best real world experience
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Indicious Flow:
Does GT-N7105 work on this kernel? :D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] rgoyena:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_11.6 ||3.0.61||OC-1900mhz|| *2|4

Everything is smooth and fast and yes benchmarks are low but who cares abouy that i guess
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] shaolin95:
That was funny and true! :D :good:

I am not getting very consistent performance from this kernel. Is like my results are very high or very low randomly unlike with my previous kernel also at 1.920.

It is the CPU performance the one that is erratic.

My favorite test, MAME Reloaded running Turbo Outrun truly shows it is not performing at 1.920 consistently as it skips many frames.

I tried zen and others as well.

Any ideas?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ptmr3:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_11.6 ||3.0.61||OC-1900mhz|| *2|4

Skipping frames is most likely lacking gpu not cpu and it only goes to 1900:)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] shaolin95:
It is CPU related on that app trust me. :) That is the reason I run the 1.920 asylum core instead of Perseus which has GPU overclock unlike Asylum. CPU makes all the difference on that app. :)

Oh yeah, 1920 is the other one lol Sorry.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] willzilla:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_11.6 ||3.0.61||OC-1900mhz|| *2|4

You can gpu oc on saber takes about 2 min. I'm at 733mhz.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] shaolin95:
Cool to know but still the issue is CPU not GPU so that is my main concern now.

Thanks though
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] willzilla:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_11.6 ||3.0.61||OC-1900mhz|| *2|4

Don't see how 20Mhz would make such a drastic change with the CPU.

Did you run stability testing on the cpu after over clocking it? How did it look?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] rgoyena:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_11.6 ||3.0.61||OC-1900mhz|| *2|4

And how is that? Thanks
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] willzilla:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_11.6 ||3.0.61||OC-1900mhz|| *2|4

Runs great but haven't really noticed any drastic difference.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] willl03:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_11.6 ||3.0.61||OC-1900mhz|| *2|4

Neak kernel for N7105 worked for my I317, guess the opposite is also true but you'd better get an official word not to damage your phone
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] shaolin95:
mmm nobody said it was about 20 Mhz amigo. I have been overclocking everything I get my hands on for many many years so not trying to brag, but I know my overclocking ;)

Stability testing is pushing the phone to the max with apps that can do that. I wish we had an Intel Burn Test app like but the ones available are hardly worth any time.

Some apps can show your phone issues much better but this is not a stability issue.

In any case, I was just reporting hoping to help the OP as I do like his Jedi Rom a lot and the more kernel devs we have the better.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] willzilla:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_11.6 ||3.0.61||OC-1900mhz|| *2|4

Ahh... ok, thought you said you were running asylum at 1920Mhz whereas Saber tops at 1900Mhz without manually modifying files and such lol, my bad :)

AnTuTu had a decent stability test but def not Intel burn in extensive and demanding.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] shaolin95:
No worries. I am about to flash the latest Jedi rom now. I have been too long on the same ROM, the flash bug cannot be contained! :D

I will let the stock kernel first to see how it behaves.

How are you guys OCing the GPU on this one.

I normally use either Voltage Control or SetCPU but did not see any GPU options for this kernel.

Regards :good:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] willzilla:
Check out: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2007201

I use smanager from that thread to boot load the 733Mhz script. Works great!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ptmr3:
Updated!!!

Straight to v13 to fix issues with MHL/SD Swap/ Freq Sticking
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] opasha:
if you don't mind me asking...what is the mhl audio fix? will that rectify the car audio output scratchiness? thanks bro :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ptmr3:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_13.4 ||3.0.61||OC-1900mhz|| --&gt;2|6

I was unaware anyone had experienced scratchiness which ron
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] willzilla:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_13.4 ||3.0.61||OC-1900mhz|| --&gt;2|6

Awesome, thank you!

Question though. I no longer see gpu located in /sys/devices/system so unsure how to oc gpu any longer? Cpu master gpu control only scales to 400Mhz which is below stock lol.

Thanks!

---------- Post added at 01:59 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:49 AM ----------

Not sure if intentional but also see the performance gov is gone.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] opasha:
yeah, i think myself and another person in the perseus thread were the only ones experiencing such things on stock sound. it's really weird. never had the problem before when i was on cleanrom 3.5 with perseus 29. but on cleanrom 4.0.5 with stock kernel (on a previous camera defective note 2) and 4.2.5 on my new note 2 with stock kernel and yours (bc i assume you had no sound mods), the scratchy sound comes whenever i play songs in youtube or mx player on regular or high quality. could it just be youtube? when i use stweaks and put the speaker amplification to -4, it is completely resolved- sound quality is crisp on hq and normal. this is the main reason why i had to go back to perseus kernel despite the better performance and battery life on your kernel.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ptmr3:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_13.4 ||3.0.61||OC-1900mhz|| --&gt;2|6

It's adjustable in App. Will be adding more steps and ability to OC it later.

Also yes I removed performance. The governor is useless. There is never a benefit to locking your cpu at peak frequency indefinitely. Especially at 1900mhz. Pegasusq will ramp up extremely fast but will actually fluctuate as the processor needs instead of locking it in a sauna for no benefit... that's my rant. MORAL OF THE STORY= Don't do that to your little buddy lol
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ptmr3:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_13.4 ||3.0.61||OC-1900mhz|| --&gt;2|6

Well give it a go and let me know
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] TheGrandFinale2001:
Glad I checked before I went to work, thanks for the update. Gonna test it out.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] opasha:
ok will do. any recommended settings besides zen? should i keep it at 1.8 ghz? some people in the perseus thread were highly praising only deadline for i/o. appreciate the help and advice :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] willzilla:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_13.4 ||3.0.61||OC-1900mhz|| --&gt;2|6

Ooo I know. I only used performance for benchmark. Seemed to help inflate the numbers a little lol.

---------- Post added at 07:58 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:54 AM ----------

Which app? CPU control gpu adjust only can move up to 400Mhz so I'm sure I'm being an idiot and looking in the wrong place lol.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] shaolin95:
Can you run Taiji benchmark at 733 and tell me what you get?

That is the easiest app to tell if the OCing is working or not for the GPU.

Thanks
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Cab121:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_13.4 ||3.0.61||OC-1900mhz|| --&gt;2|6

Hay ptmr3 bro.

I know at some point in Saber Kernels development you where trying out exFat compatibility. Turned out Saber and exFat didn't see things eye to eye. Was curious if you had any luck with taming exFat to behave or if that option has been shelved.

Aaaaaaaand just cause devs should be thanked at every opportunity. Thank you, Deviant, and The Force for such finely crafted development. Keeping my toys awesome with class.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] willzilla:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_13.4 ||3.0.61||OC-1900mhz|| --&gt;2|6

I'm no longer oc since loading latest kernel. The layout and oc method has changed it seems.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] shaolin95:
What app?

I tried a few already and no luck.

Thansk!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] ptmr3:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_13.4 ||3.0.61||OC-1900mhz|| --&gt;2|6

Antutu cpu master is what I'm using. Keep in mind adjusted not OC yet. I haven't changed any freq
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] shaolin95:
Oh got ya! :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] jdc5:
WOW. you really dont give anyone a chance to settle huh? great kernal. Thanks...... maybe still too soon? Im gonna start sounding like a broken record thanking you.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] 9wire:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_13.4 ||3.0.61||OC-1900mhz|| --&gt;2|6

GPU @ 800
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] willzilla:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_13.4 ||3.0.61||OC-1900mhz|| --&gt;2|6

This with the 13 kernel?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] shaolin95:
Excellent.

What kernel version and can you attach the script you are using amigo?

I used to run scripts with Perseus but this last time I tried with this kernel I didnt get it to work.

Thanks!

PS I keep getting an error running the scripts.

Added a screenshot

I dont have a GPU folder at that location.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] willzilla:
I don't see your screenshot.

The old scripts won't work because the old location that you would tweak the gpu freq and voltages in is no longer there with the new saber kernel.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] shaolin95:
Oh so I need to go back then or have you found a location for the folder on the new one?

YEAH xda is acting up and not attaching the image.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] willzilla:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_13.4 ||3.0.61||OC-1900mhz|| --&gt;2|6

Yeah I'm stock now since kernel update. Not sure where the GPU Freq and voltages ate based from. I combed over his mali code changes on git but didn't see any specifics with a cursory look lol. The five is wreak with me haha.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] 9wire:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_13.4 ||3.0.61||OC-1900mhz|| --&gt;2|6

I'm on a different kernel, but I think oc'ing the gpu helps a little, at least it feels different when I don't.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] shaolin95:
Got ya. Guess we will have to wait to see if the Dev adds it or tells us where the options are.

Thanks!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] Jbluedodge:
Re: |KERNEL| SaberKernel_13.4 ||3.0.61||OC-1900mhz|| --&gt;2|6

So I have reinstalled with fresh installs, the rom and kernel, I'm using the new jedi rom and the newest kernel, for some reason blue tooth will not auto connect anymore for some reason.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note II] shaolin95:
Not sure why is doing that because mine is working perfectly so far.

Only thing I need to make this the perfect kernel is GPU overclocking...oh and maybe go all the way to 2Ghz but I always want more :D