yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[HTC Rezound] Neo:
Thank you for addressing our request :)

Who would I need to bring a list of those original development threads that still remain in the Android Development forum that need to transfer here?

-Neo

EDIT:

The following fall under the guidelines of First for the device/official/or heavily modified original kernel work:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1911297

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2074906

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1659210

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2071043

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2079282
[HTC Rezound] xHausx:
It may take some time to sort through everything, but the best way to let us know is to PM one of us.

edit: Unless I'm missing something the MIUI and AOKP threads aren't even GPL compliant?
[HTC Rezound] Neo:
lol

Busted!

Added to my signature thanks.
[HTC Rezound] SynisterWolf:
he didnt know where to put it. give him a break :P
[HTC Rezound] Papa Smurf151:
I have moved a large amount of threads over to the Original Dev section. This mainly consisted of cm10/cm9/aokp/kernel threads that were source built. Please PM me or any other mod if you think your thread should be moved as well.
[HTC Rezound] SynisterWolf:
gotta say. you mods rock. thank you for everything you do. :)
[HTC Rezound] GrayBoltWolf:
I almost had a heart attack because I couldn't find my CyanogenMod mega threads!

Thought I was going to be banned or something. :D
[HTC Rezound] braveally:
Ok, this explains a lot. I thought I was going nuts for a sec.
[HTC Rezound] siulmagic:
i wish we had a poll asking if we wanted this, iv always been agianst separating dev section, for the same thing, this just alienated and confuses the users.
[HTC Rezound] brenuga:
I tend to agree with siul.

Do you know how much extra work is to have three main folders to check under each device? General / Development (read ROMS that are cool but came from another device) / and Original Development (ROMS that are still based on others work but have been tweaked/setup somewhat uniquely.)

Honest to God, those were my reactions. So I know where siul is coming from...how is MIUI in a different thread than AOKP? If you add a few apps that look different and don't ship with AOKP, is that suddenly original?

Again, not trying to start drama but just my two cents.

EDIT: Just read the whole justification for this. I get it, but still think it's another layer of stuff to sort through.
[HTC Rezound] csong95:
Bad idea change thing back to the old ways Please

This is bad Mostly for the user who are new i seen the other forum that are like this, not a good i idea doing this plus the developer hate going to one forum to the other just to set thing straight
[HTC Rezound] torr310:
i am confused too. It may look more obvious and understandable for devs only...
[HTC Rezound] GrayBoltWolf:
Re: New Original Development Sub-Forum

Not really. I am not sure how my CM threads fall into original development.
[HTC Rezound] Neo:
Re: New Original Development Sub-Forum

Because all are built from source by the person posting them and not a rom modified from someone else's. It falls under the original development guidelines that are posted in the op of this thread.
[HTC Rezound] GrayBoltWolf:
Re: New Original Development Sub-Forum

Oh. I see original as something new and completely different.

Whatever.
[HTC Rezound] siulmagic:
I don't see how this works then, because none of my roms are based on someone else's work. and if what you say was true, then all aosp roms compiled from chad's git should be placed on the general dev section instead of the "original dev section" since everyone's aosp rom is based on his work(compiling it docent make it your work). And please understand im just trying to make a point here, no trying to be an ass or anything. i just hate the idea of roms being divided by 2 different dev sections. its just prone to confusion.
[HTC Rezound] GrayBoltWolf:
Re: New Original Development Sub-Forum

That's what I think. All of the AOSP ROMs built from Chad's git are not original unless chad himself released a ROM.
[HTC Rezound] rezoundness:
Re: New Original Development Sub-Forum

I think this new thread splt is to confusing. Now I have to check two places. Please revert to back
[HTC Rezound] Neo:
Re: New Original Development Sub-Forum

I don't take your response to that effect in any way and no intent to malice received.

This plainly states that the self compiled roms belong on the Android Development forum so I side with you in that aspect. However, there is no official or maintainer version of CyanogenMod roms or AOKP thread available so unless Chad uploads his build in this forum as he rightfully could, these builds (from what I understand) can and should be posted here.
[HTC Rezound] NilsP:
Re: New Original Development Sub-Forum

Both of my active ROMs are built directly from HTC (Rezound and Vills) not other peoples work so where should they be.

Should add that I don't care just curious how the guidelines apply
[HTC Rezound] Snuzzo:
Re: New Original Development Sub-Forum

My take on it was that anything that would have been ported or modded via smali/baksmali would fall in general dev, but its not contained to that, if there was a work that was made original say LeeDroid Tweaks for our Global RUU would fall in original development as it would be "innovative creation with IP involved".

Original development does not necessarily fall within the guidelines of needing official builds. Say for instance one were to port Steel Droid with the OK from the original maintainer, it would fall in general development. If later went back in and compiled from source it would then fall into original development.

Edit

This is why those whom posted builds without covering GPL would also fall in general development.

Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Xparent ICS Tapatalk 2
[HTC Rezound] gr8nole:
Re: New Original Development Sub-Forum

As a general user, I don't like the separation. Makes it less user friendly.
[HTC Rezound] Snuzzo:
Re: New Original Development Sub-Forum

How so?

Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Xparent ICS Tapatalk 2
[HTC Rezound] scy1192:
My opinion is that

1) it's not really necessary here, there's not exactly a lot to wade through.

and

2) "original" development is a misnomer considering no one here actually created a lot of what they put out; most of it was done by either HTC, Google, or the CyanogenMod team. Note I'm not saying there's *no* original development going on, but a lot of it is not technically original.

A side issue is that I'm concerned about the legality of HTC ROMs and the GPL requirements for a lot of the kernels here (not HTC's as they're not GPL'd afaik). HTC hasn't granted any privileges to distribute their software, but that's probably a non-issue since they haven't cracked down on it.
[HTC Rezound] GrayBoltWolf:
Re: New Original Development Sub-Forum

Because there is two different dev sections and it is unclear what the difference is.
[HTC Rezound] Snuzzo:
Re: New Original Development Sub-Forum

http://www.xda-developers.com/android/introducing-original-development-forums-for-more-devices/

@scy

Trust me there is ALOT more than what alot of you have seen. I know of quite a few roms that can be considered original development just based again on IP. Also regarding your gpl statement, explain that further please as to why the works would not be compliant as such? They come with the same license document that HTC included in the zip file that can be downloaded from their servers.

Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Xparent ICS Tapatalk 2
[HTC Rezound] gr8nole:
Re: New Original Development Sub-Forum

Let me start by saying that I don't think it is a big deal either way. But, I feel it is less user friendly, because I now have to look in two different places to keep track of all the different roms that I follow. I try to read through most of the newer threads, just to see what issues people are having and how/if they get resolved. That is why I don't keep them all in my favorites. Therefore, having to look in different sections for roms means less user friendly (for me).
[HTC Rezound] Snuzzo:
Re: New Original Development Sub-Forum

Please don't take offense but that's what subscriptions are for.

Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Xparent ICS Tapatalk 2
[HTC Rezound] scy1192:
Unless I'm mistaken, the kernel is under GPL but the software itself is not, correct? And things under GPL must link to the source code which looking through the first few pages isnt too bad but I found that BAMF kernel doesn't link to the kernel source.
[HTC Rezound] gr8nole:
Re: New Original Development Sub-Forum

Not offended at all, but I use my subscriptions/favorites as a true "Favorites" category. There are too many other rom threads that I read to call them all favorites. Just my personal preference, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks all roms should be in the same category.
[HTC Rezound] Snuzzo:
Re: New Original Development Sub-Forum

Youre absolutely correct. Joelz has a link to his github, in which I've always taken it that he's been the maintainer for BAMFs kernels for a while now.

Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Xparent ICS Tapatalk 2
[HTC Rezound] scy1192:
I don't see it in the post, and I know there are others but I don't want to wade through the post right now. Even if that point is moot, there's the problem of redistributing non-free software here still. And this is getting too off-topic.
[HTC Rezound] Snuzzo:
Re: New Original Development Sub-Forum

Non free software? How so? Its open source Linux based, and to keep it that way that's one of the instances as to why GPL was created.

Sent from my ADR6425LVW using Xparent ICS Tapatalk 2
[HTC Rezound] TunedReference:
Whew, I too had a heart attack when I saw Neo's ROMs missing from the other forum!

Thanks for explaining what "Original" means though. I've looked for ROMs on other devices and usually ignored the "Original" forums, assuming that they meant "archive" or something. Guess I should have read, but now I know I'll have to check both forums whenever I'm looking for something.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] BoomBang85:
I just installed ForsakenGB v3.5 on Xperia Ray.

Before installing it, I flashed 4.1.B.0.431 with GB 2.3.4, rooted it using DooMLoRD's Easy Rooting Toolkit.

Installed CMW recoeryX and using that installed the rom.

Now data connection doesn't seem to work. Manually defining APN doesn't help. Asking my carrier for configuration messages doesn't work (they are never received unlike before).

Any help will be appreciated (let me know if I can clear my issue with more relevant data)
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] SXUsr:
You need to flash a GB kernel before flashing custom GB ROMs.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] Wechy77:
What baseband do you have?
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] justmpm:
Under System Settings->Security make sure that you deactivate an SIM card lock. Then reboot and try to reset up your APN.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] vaibha:
U just need internet settings.. Go to accessibility dwnload... Or call network help n ask fr settings
[Xperia Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] lekhwani:
Guys I would like to know the easiest way to :

1.Root only

2.Unlock bootoader

3. Install 2.3.4 stock or custom ROM

I have a Verizon r800x on 2.3.2 and I am in India and using this device just as a gaming and multimedia device.

Thanks.

I have gone through a few pages but got confused due to other versions of play and android versions. I have only WiFi on my phone. ( no evdo as not registered yet on any Indian network yet)
[Xperia Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] chery2k:
1.Root only (super one click)

2.Unlock bootoader (pay method settools)

3. Install 2.3.4 stock or custom ROM (no custom on r800x on 2.3.4 only 2.3.3 plus you cant use GSM GB roms)
[Xperia Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] eksasol:
1. To root, turn on USB Debugging mode in your phone and use SuperOneClick or Flashtool to root.

2. Unlock the bootloader for free and void your warranty at Sony website: http://unlockbootloader.sonymobile.com/

3. You can install the NXT rom for CDMA play (get it in dev section), its based on stock 2.3.4. May sure you flash the CDMA version.

To flash roms you need to install clockworkmod, use CWM Installer version 5. To boot into CWM press Volume Down while you see the Sony logo.

You do not need an unlocked bootloader to install CWM or the NXT rom, just root.
[Xperia Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] lekhwani:
Thanks guys. Do I need to install Sony drivers to root via superoneclick ?

If yes, can someone give me a link for drivers?

I have adb installed on my computer.
[Xperia Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Thaevil0ne:
Not sure if this is needed for superoneclick.

Myself I used: DooMLoRD_v4_ROOT-zergRush-busybox-su - And for this version it was needed.

(I think if you do not install them it would not detect your device.)

However here is the link to the adb drivers:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=24883071#post24883071

Download, during installation check the xperia play driver and it should install.

When it asks click: Install anyway.

PS: It is not going to hurt anything having them installed.

Kind regards, Stefan.
[Xperia Play Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] chery2k:
You dont need drivers to use superoneclick. Your drivers should've been automatically installed when you plug in your xperia play via usb cable for the first time on any pc. You might already have the drivers installed already.
[General Accessories] rosenight:
I found an interesting video on youtube. It's about no booting system for smartphone, but not sure it's kind of software or hardware.

But looks great. hope it to be applied to my phone.:D

[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esX3bPDf3sw[/YOUTUBE]
[General Accessories] trihordias:
Wow!

seems great!:good: Where can i get it? :D
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] nlz242:
I've been using CM10 and now 10.1 for a while now. I like it alot but im having a little issue...

I've searched XDA and found a couple of mention of this issue but no workaround or more info than the usual "yes, i'm also having this issue".

When i connect my phone to the computer, the SD card and internal storage are inverted, yet they report proper sizes.

I wouldnt mind if it was only a cosmetic issue, however i'm having issues copying files on my internal memory because my SD Card is full...

For exemple... when i plug my phone i see "SD Card" with 346mb free out of 59.4gb (using a 64gb sdcard) and i see Internal memory as 8.41gb free out of 12gb. If i want to copy a file that is bigger than 350mb on my internal memory, i have to go into "SD Card" and copy it there and then it fails to copy saying there isnt enough free space.

So yeah, while the cosmetic inversion doesnt bother me, the fact that it's checking for the required free-space in the wrong place before copying is a bit annoying.

I'm using my SD Card for music storage, i like to keep things separated and well sorted... so right now, my solution is to delete enough stuff on my SD Card so that it has more free-space than the files i want to copy on my internal storage :eek:

Any workaround other than that?
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] BWolf56:
I'm not sure if there's a workaround but you could try mounting through recovery?

It sounds like a ROM problem, did you clean flash CM10.1?
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] nlz242:
I did do a clean flash. Over the holidays, i played around with AOKP and CM10.1 as i had issues getting my Wifi to work on CM10.1 and AOKP was working fine (ended up breaking in AOKP after the holidays too, had to change my router's setting from simple WPA to WPA2, but thats another story). So while playing around, i ended up wipping the phone a few times.

Sadly, i don't remember if the issue was also present in AOKP or if it was just CM10.1

I'm using TWRP, nothing shows up on my computer when i plug the phone while running TWRP. So i'm not sure...

Just for reference, here's two other posts with the same issue, both on CM10.1:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=35955212#post35955212

http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=36524266&postcount=184
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] BWolf56:
I'm not having this issue on AOKP, like I mentioned, it could be ROM specific.

As for TWRP, there should be a mount option.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] nlz242:
Yeah, im pretty sure its ROM specific too...

For TWRP, there is a mount button, but it doesnt seem to be there for USB mounting. I couldnt find the option to mount anything on USB...

I backed up everything and ill do a complete wipe now, just to see if it fixes it...
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] BWolf56:
Mount storage perhaps? Or mount internal/external.

I'm downloading a big file right now so I can't check but will check later if you haven't got it.
[AT&T, Rogers, Bell, Telus Samsung Galaxy S III] nlz242:
Well good sir, it seems like your initial assessment was quite correct. After wiping everything (Factory, cache, dalvik, format internal) and re installing CM10.1 latest nightly, my issue is fixed.

Now im reloading everything using Titanium Backup, hopefully i get all my settings back, without restoring the issue... :laugh:

Thanks alot!
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] leledumbo:
What I mean is the one we can see at "About Phone". I have several cwm backups and now I want to return to one of them. The problem is I only name them by date and time, so I have no idea what ROM is contained on each. Those ROMs store their name in the about phone, so if I can access that, I would know which one to take.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] chepoz:
All of them, was inside the build.prop.... :D

Sent from Hubble Telescope
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] leledumbo:
I finally get the info by unyaffs2-ing the system.yaffs2.img from each backup, thanks
[LG Optimus L9 P760, P765, P768, P769] csrow:
I have been using slightly different apps to make the phone set to overclock automatically after a boot, I use 'SManager' app to edit and save the script (there is a free version) to run the script after a boot up.

Then I also use "CPU Master"(free version) to control the upper frequency set and the scaling method. I have been using 'interactive'.

With those two apps, the phone will boot up after a reset to the proper frequency and be ready to go automatically.

Try the following script if you want to try to push it to 1300MHz.

#! /system/bin/sh
insmod /system/lib/modules/symsearch.ko
insmod /system/lib/modules/cpu_control.ko
echo 0 333 830 > /proc/cpu_control/tweak_cpu
echo 1 666 1050 > /proc/cpu_control/tweak_cpu
echo 2 999 1150 > /proc/cpu_control/tweak_cpu
echo 3 1300 1340 > /proc/cpu_control/tweak_cpu
[LG Optimus L9 P760, P765, P768, P769] luq529:
You can try 1220Mhz on 1270mV. For me it is more stable then on 1200Mhz and 1360mV.
[LG Optimus L9 P760, P765, P768, P769] csrow:
Were you having problems at 1200MHz and 1360mV? I'm just curious how one determines one set up is more stable than the others.

I have tried running SetCPU stress tests before but that test either runs fine or ends with a lock up.
[LG Optimus L9 P760, P765, P768, P769] kevev:
Thank You csrow for mentioning me. :D

My P769 would not run stable @ 1200Mhz so I removed the overclock. I may have bad hardware because it has been rebooting randomly at stock clock speeds. This is my 3rd L9. My wife is on her 3rd also.
[LG Optimus L9 P760, P765, P768, P769] luq529:
I don't know why. On this settings I have 8200 points in Antutu. Maybe 1220 Mhz is better for our processor.
[LG Optimus L9 P760, P765, P768, P769] adixtra:
my current stable voltages

echo 0 300 830 > /proc/cpu_control/tweak_cpu
echo 1 600 860 > /proc/cpu_control/tweak_cpu
echo 2 800 890 > /proc/cpu_control/tweak_cpu
echo 3 1000 950 > /proc/cpu_control/tweak_cpu

:)
[LG Optimus L9 P760, P765, P768, P769] Jrkoffjonson:
Link is dead :'[
[LG Optimus L9 P760, P765, P768, P769] luq529:
How do you do that ?! That's amazing from 1388 to 950. I will try it soon.
[LG Optimus L9 P760, P765, P768, P769] csrow:
Fixed the link. Try again.
[LG Optimus L9 P760, P765, P768, P769] cmahendra:
Now we have full working CWM 6 for L9, is it by any chance possible to make flashable zip for overclocking and a zip for reverting back to default clock settings?:confused:
[LG Optimus L9 P760, P765, P768, P769] Roker1:
Which are the best settings to save more battery life??
[LG Optimus L9 P760, P765, P768, P769] Carter07:
Any way to overclock also gpu? :)
[LG Optimus L9 P760, P765, P768, P769] klhk:
Does anyone know the default voltage for L9?
[LG Optimus L9 P760, P765, P768, P769] Mr.Brown94:
Here the default voltages. :o

echo 0 300 1025 > /proc/cpu_control/tweak_cpu

echo 1 600 1200 > /proc/cpu_control/tweak_cpu

echo 2 800 1325 > /proc/cpu_control/tweak_cpu

echo 3 1000 1388 > /proc/cpu_control/tweak_cpu
[LG Optimus L9 P760, P765, P768, P769] Carter07:
These are my voltages:

echo 0 300 830 > /proc/cpu_control/tweak_cpu
echo 1 600 830 > /proc/cpu_control/tweak_cpu
echo 2 800 840 > /proc/cpu_control/tweak_cpu
echo 3 1000 860 > /proc/cpu_control/tweak_cpu

They seems crazy low compared to stock but I tested them one by one (set governor to fixed frequency) and they were all stable for 20 minutes of stability test (classic test).

I verified they were successfully applied running "cat /proc/cpu_control/opp_table_current"

I played also fifa 12 for 15 minutes with interactive governor min 300 max 1000 and system was stable.

How can it be?
[LG Optimus L9 P760, P765, P768, P769] klhk:
This is my setting, i will try lower voltage later.

echo 0 300 850 > /proc/cpu_control/tweak_cpu

echo 1 600 880 > /proc/cpu_control/tweak_cpu

echo 2 800 920 > /proc/cpu_control/tweak_cpu

echo 3 1000 1000 > /proc/cpu_control/tweak_cpu
[LG Optimus L9 P760, P765, P768, P769] kevev:
Try running the insmod commands from the terminal and let us know what you see. Also, try replacing the modules. Maybe they are corrupt.
[LG Optimus L9 P760, P765, P768, P769] wlado93:
well, I downloaded new modules from link in 1st post modules L9 10h 1398mV 3.0.21-00001-gd335ca33.zip

now it works :)
[LG Optimus L9 P760, P765, P768, P769] chicguy:
Lower the CPU as much as possible :) Normally (but not absolutely), the higher the CPU frequency, the more energy you spend, which leads to less time on each battery cycle.

To be honest, when I switched to L9, I was looking for a phone with large screen, high capacity battery and memory, but as low frequency as possible for CPU :) (I use tablet for games). Of course I couldn't find one :(

I don't use these tweaks right now, but I thought SetCPU can do the same thing? Can someone please tell me the difference?
[LG Optimus L9 P760, P765, P768, P769] elpuertorro:
I think..

I think for SetCPU to work you need the kernel to already have the settings in it so default is just to say a number 1.1ghz and that's max default on stock rom, so in the new script, module or kernel must have the other instructions for the CPU so let's say 1.202 mhz, 1.266Mhz, 1.322Mhz, 1.377,and so on, so in other words i believe Set CPU reads what's on the kernel and goes by that so if stock is limited to 1.1Mhz you won't go past that no matter what until you add the lines needed for the instructions to the CPU

if i'm wrong please someone correct me for the benefit of all and the knowledge ;)
[LG Optimus L9 P760, P765, P768, P769] iodak:
Added 3.0.31 JB v20

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=33418985
[LG Optimus L9 P760, P765, P768, P769] luq529:
Odp: Basic L9 Overclocking instruction

Doesn't work for me on jelly bean.

Edit: New modules works perefctly :)
[LG Optimus L9 P760, P765, P768, P769] Dragusdrake:
there is an interesting thread for overclock, also overclock GPU

http://rootzwiki.com/topic/14511-opptimizer-projekt-milestone-overclock-for-omap4-devices/