yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] DooMLoRD:
yups... but the point of posting this was not for reference sake...

many devs can use the libs to improve existing/work-in-progress ROMs...

many themers can start porting to ROMs/devices...

many users will get a feel of whats in store for the JB update...

keep checking: http://developer.sonymobile.com/downloads/opensource/

not immediately... but its in the works for later ;)

nope... camera hardware/drivers are different... is there issue for camera drivers on CM10? if yes contact me via p.m. (i have something for the Xperia S as well ;) )
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Entropy512:
What are the permissions of your internal SD card? Not the emulated one that apps interface with, but the underlying ext4 filesystem?

Was your "corruption" clear and obvious ext4 corruption, or could it have been the underlying ext4 permissions didn't match what was expected by the fuse daemon that emulates FAT-ish permissions on top of an ext4 filesystem?

The behavior of your "corruption" sounds similar to the permissions issues that currently occur when going back and forth between Sony ICS and CM10.0 (especially back right now...)
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] jerdog:
Yep - completely agree. Might want to make that little disclaimer... ;)
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] DooMLoRD:
i am not sure about the permissions... this is what had happened... i had flashed a version of the leak which booted... after reboot the device got stuck in that "grey triangle" with blue bar below... i think its the firmware update (FOTA?) process indicator... it used to come up at every reboot... just after the bootlogo... and device used to get stuck... no boot animation, no nothing... this was very odd... i flash stock FTF of ICS but still i was stuck at that "grey firmware update triangle"... then while in recovery i tried to restore my old backup and it came that sdcard couldnt be mounted...

i was able to flash to CM10 by putting it on external sdcard but even that didnt boot...

as a last ditch effort i formatted the internal sdcard in recovery and then i was able to get boot on all roms, stock ICS FW, JB leak FW, CM10...

my learnings:

there is something in the ICS/JB(CM10) code that doesnt allow the device to go past boot if the internal sdcard or device mounted/to be mounted at /sdcard is corrupt...

this sdcard corruption is triggering the FOTAkernel or some other hidden firmware flasher...

this is an interesting find as we might get some way to trigger entry into the FOTAkernel partition if the above is indeed whats happening but as of now this is just speculation...

unfortunately since this device is not under warranty (bought in the UK and using it here in India) i cannot do such "dangerous testing" as i may end up with bricked device....
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Rizal Lovins:
Thanks Doom

Damn SONY is great job on JB ROM

I see Big different with my Xperia V running ICS, but SONY doesn't include BE 2 on Xperia T

I succes fully ported new soundenhancement for All device with all driver audio, this small improvment audio quality and better than Xperia V using ICS ;)

Best Regards

Rizal Lovins
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] jader13254:
AW: [LT30p][ROM+Kernel][4.1.2]{LEAK} Sony JellyBean Firmware: 9.1.A.0.485

Cool Bro :D

This time avoid framework probs regarding camera... I couldn't take pics ob xmas because I installed your mod and camera FC'ed :D

Lol the logcat was funny xD

Well, Sony is great if you got flashgship, but when I got arc S it was flagship, and the ICS Update is very bad Aosp & Xperia Mixxed, we want nxt style... :rolleyes:
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] DooMLoRD:
Some food for thought for interested devs...

Possible way to get baseband recognized on the leak build

So we used to do this in the good old Xperia X10 days... My good friend cobrato figured out some dependent files to get baseband to be recognized between incompatible firmwares! It worked on froyo and gingerbread but X10 never got official updates beyond that... The point is, if some devs can figure out the correct set of files to be extracted from ICS stock rom then we can paste them in this JB leak... There is a slim chance but it might work and baseband might be recognized....

Here is cobratos thread for froyo (x10)

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1011608
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] jader13254:
AW: [LT30p][ROM+Kernel][4.1.2]{LEAK} Sony JellyBean Firmware: 9.1.A.0.485

Well maybe sony disabled actually completely... So maybe chance=0 :D

Others ROMs are made to make calls // enabled baseband if correct // maybe sony didn't anything related to enable any kind of baseband in this build... Also ICS and JB are more different than gb/froyo... Well its actually worth a try :cool:

=> I don't know that much abt basebands, correct me if I'm wrong ^^

Also I Don't own Xperia T, just watching this thread as I'n interested in 1. News // 2. Arc S Port ^^
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Curst:
I asked about the camera quality in CM10 over at http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2083091

There are no bugs, just a matter of quality if i understood it correctly.
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] Rizal Lovins:
Haha I was told dont install Sony media apps for CM9/CM10 in stock rom, because some files conflict like com.sonyericsson.privateapis.jar (Camera)

Agree, Official ROM ICS Xperia 2011 is very bad, Sony doesn't make ROM like Xperia 2012, i don't care about apps like Walkman Album etc, but I need system like Xperia 2012,

I just try to port Camera Xperia V with some mod to Xperia 2011 and did not work :( but works well in Xperia 2012, because system camera same with Xperia V or T

I'm still waiting SONY roll out Final JB ROM, I will starting mod Camera for Xperia T,TX,V with some new features, like added resolution, quality & etc ;)

Best Regards

Rizal Lovins
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] crazymister:
Actually the Rom was made to be fully functional for all testers (Sony employees). If they need to know if a phone works, one needs to be able to have 3g or higher, WiFi and more.

But since it has some code because it's a brown device, it all works slightly different for red devices.

And if you look in the post about the leaked 4.1.2 in the general section you will clearly see in the screenshots that data and telephony is enabled.

So maybe, just maybe that trick might work. Sure hope it works cause that's one of the few things holding me back of checking it out.

Did I help? please press thanks button
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] pulser_g2:
That might work... But there's an issue with this ROM - remounting /system will kill it with this in the kmsg:

[ 122.075110] EXT4-fs (mmcblk0p12): re-mounted. Opts: (null)
[ 122.404517] as3676 10-0040: Shutting down AS3676
[ 122.411750] Restarting system.
[ 122.412147]
[ 122.412391] Restarting Linux version 3.4.0-g5b052b2-00752-g2224ff0 (BuildUser@BuildHost) (gcc version 4.6.x-google 20120106 (prerelease) (GCC) ) #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Jan 11 09:34:48 2013
[ 122.412421]
[ 122.413276] Going down for restart now

Making pushing files to try get baseband working a bit pointless.
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] pulser_g2:
Got mobile signal (ie. data) working - tested on HSDPA

And bluetooth :)

And NFC

Not sorted wifi yet
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] pulser_g2:
humm... Wifi might not be too easy...

I/WifiHW ( 542): insmod for /system/lib/modules/wlan.ko failed
E/WifiStateMachine( 542): Failed to load driver!
D/WifiStateMachine( 542): setWifiState: unknown state
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] DooMLoRD:
please post a patch udpate.zip to make it working...

check dmsg
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] pulser_g2:
Maybe later, I don't want to post an update.zip until I determine that this ROM is safe enough for folks to use - if I post it, they will try to use it... I'd prefer to get Wifi working too, it wasn't loading the module, but I fixed that. Will take another look.

WiFi:

<6>[ 19.581443] wlan: loading driver v3.1.8.25
<3>[ 19.598565] [WLAN][750:F :HDD] Mac address: 30:39:26:xx:xx:xx
<3>[ 19.601770] [WLAN][750:F :HDD] Mac address: 30:39:26:xx:xx:xx
<3>[ 19.604578] [WLAN][750:F :HDD] Mac address: 30:39:26:xx:xx:xx
<3>[ 19.607355] [WLAN][750:F :HDD] Mac address: 30:39:26:xx:xx:xx
<3>[ 19.612299] [WLAN][750:E :PE ] CheckParam: 770: Param id 40 wrong permissions 237094
<3>[ 19.612299] [WLAN][750:E :PE ] ProcSetReqInternal: 671: Check param failed, param 40

<3>[ 19.720921] wlan: WCNSS WLAN Version 1.2.2.13, Host expected 0.1.1.0
<6>[ 19.720921] wlan: WCNSS software version M8960AAAAANAZW153618
<6>[ 19.720952] wlan: WCNSS hardware version WCN vUnknown IRIS v2.0 with 48MHz XO
<6>[ 19.800030] wlan: driver loaded

<3>[ 20.282862] [WLAN][830:E :SME] PMC: STA not associated with an AP with single active session. BMPS cannot be entered
<6>[ 20.405585] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready
<3>[ 20.405707] [WLAN][830:E :SME] PMC: STA not associated with an AP with single active session. BMPS cannot be entered
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] DooMLoRD:
and Sound (audio) works too :)
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] DooMLoRD:
ok... got recovery to work... kind of... atleast i know what changes are needed to get recovery to show up correctly on the 3.4.0 sony jb kernel...
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] pulser_g2:
Yeah, I forgot to mention sound works... I didn't really try it without my fixes :)
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] DooMLoRD:
Check ur p.m. for recovery entry info...

I noticed some issues regarding multiple SMS being sent...
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] poo-tang:
Thanks for this info having this issue updating one of our stock samples either OTA, PC comp. Note this safety catch must have been implemented after stock 3.0.3 as this early FW will boot with a corrupted SD after our testing.

PS @doom nice to see ya active on the forums again :) hope uni/course going well for you :)
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] gregbradley:
Please can I remind users that any discussion needs to be made in this thread

[Discussion]Stock android 4.1.2 Jelly Bean leaked!

several posts have already been reported to mods in order to get them moved..

Thanks for your understanding
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] pulser_g2:
GPS working fine too btw.
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] lilstevie:
It is unlikely that wifi will ever work on this leak as is.
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] gregbradley:
Can you expand on this and help the development by saying why that might be?

EDIT

Thanks for your post underneath this one. I do hope that will help the devlopment of this project.
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] lilstevie:
The wifi firmware within the image is signed with a sony "test key", which naturally will not validate on our retail devices, and mismatching the firmware to the kernel driver doesn't work.
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] nickholtus:
Did you guys tried the simple: persist.wifienabled=1 trick in build.prop?

Most test builds disabled wifi and we got it enabled this way on xperia 2011 leaks and beta builds
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] krabappel2548:
I think DooMLoRD probably tried that one :p

But maybe he forgot it yes :)
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] nickholtus:
nope, not what he told me:)

he contacted me before regarding this leak (before it was posted on xda)

I tried to help him to get it booting and later on bug fixes
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] lilstevie:
Even if this were to work, the problem of the wifi firmware being signed with Sony's test certificate is still a valid problem, this is the same reason that sound, and the baseband don't work, the difference there is that those can be mismatched without causing issues. I will try with this in the build.prop, but I have been informed that mismatched wifi firmware and kernel driver causes weird behavior and in extreme cases kernel panics
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] nickholtus:
Doomlord asked me to post my ideas here.

I am just telling what some did in all other leaked alpha and beta builds.

All in the same situation.
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] hansi66627:
AW: [LT30p][ROM+Kernel][4.1.2]{LEAK} Sony JellyBean Firmware: 9.1.A.0.485

So this rom is stock based?

Gesendet von meinem R800i mit Tapatalk 2
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] baz@gmx.co.uk:
Dude, did you even read the OP before posting? :rolleyes:
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] ChanceOfChange:
bravia engine and music info download wont work as i test it and this caused by unlocked bootloader.the part we know... so there a way or a mod to make it work again?
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] EVOQUE:
did you fix that? same with prima 3.2.3.88
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] romcio47:
What?!

My phone is T. Xperia T.
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] EVOQUE:
compiled prima_wlan.ko and got dmesg

wlan: connection failed with ... reason:3 and Status:7

need help
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] romcio47:
Well ok, friend, but this thread is almost one YEAR old (the last response before you was 26.01.2013 and we are very close to Android 4.3, why are you dealing with an old, leaked 4.1.2 release for our XT's if the new Android is right around the corner? :D

My phone is T. Xperia T.
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] EVOQUE:
Ok that's first thread about this error Google tells me

I just compile my own kernel with prima wlan module and stuck on this
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] DooMLoRD:
Prima WLAN is a huge pain...

Which device you working on?
[Sony Xperia T, TL, TX, V] EVOQUE:
HTC one xl stock jb 4.2.2

Prima source

https://www.codeaurora.org/cgit/ext...om-opensource/wlan/prima/commit/?h=jb_4.1.3.4
[Galaxy S III I9305 (4G LTE + 2GB RAM) Q&A, Help & ] tpham01:
Hi,

I am getting battery drain of between 6% to 8% browsing NON video / media pages on 4G/3G connection for 10 minutes or so using the stock browser. Does this figure sound about right? Would other browsers perform better? Thanks in advance.
[Galaxy S III I9305 (4G LTE + 2GB RAM) Q&A, Help & ] Obagleyfreer:
I would say it's a modem issue, try flashing another modem and see if it helps. I use stock browser and can use data and browse for 30minutes losing 5% battery. I'm on BLL5 modem. Give it a try
[AT&T, Rogers HTC One X, Telstra One XL] rootmyhtc:
Im in bootloop without debugging on i have incorrect cid so i cant flash ruu and i dont have perm root so i caint get any rom to take and i deleted my backup i can boot into twrp revovery so if i had a backup of working evita firmware 2.20 cid was cws__001 and hboot was 1.14 i think i could fix
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] skalicioustimes:
Hi all,

I have:

Nexus 7 4.2.1, Paranoid Android, Franco kernel.

I have been trying for some time now to change the appearance of the software buttons.

I have gone through the settings and i have also checked the Nova settings but i cant seem to find the options anywhere on the tab or in the forums.

I have tried the MIUi but no joy!

If you have any suggestions it would be much appreciated.

Thanks in advance ;)
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Gigabitex2:
Here's a thread that might help http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1880686
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] skalicioustimes:
I have tried metamorph but for some reason i cannot seem to apply PNG files as my soft buttons that i have for my Evangelion Theme.

Do the files need to be in a different format?

The only file i see in metamorph is MuiuBlue which i don't want to use and even when i click on it i get an error message.

Do i need to download a theme to use with metamorph?

Does metamorph work with Paranoid Android?

Is pa odex or deodexed? Does it matter?

Cheers
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dparrothead1:
Delete.
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] skalicioustimes:
Where do you change the soft keys??

I cannot find that option anywhere
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] davisac:
I haven't seen any way to do it besides manually. I used this guide:
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] skalicioustimes:
Just a quick question, will zenyth allow me to apply my own soft keys? Or are they themes for soft keys?

The soft keys i have on my sdcard are PNG format.

Thanks for that, i will give it a go shortly.

I was lost looking in settings to change the appearance of the soft keys, and metamorph was no different.

Cheers
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] davisac:
Yeah I actually tried a couple different keys to see what I liked. I ended up going back to stock as they seem to work better with tablet UI.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] crjjr:
How do you tell if which type of cpu your phone has? I've looked and can't seem to find out how to check my phone to see which I have. My cpu always seems to run hot no matter what type of kernel I try, and I'm wondering if the cpu may be slow and not capable of tweaking.

Any help someone can give me would be great.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] SlimSnoopOS:
To find out which processor you have, use Terminal Emulator from the Play Store. Reboot then type this command:

su

dmesg | grep ACPU

Here's an explanation of what this means and also recommended voltage settings for each processor type courtesy of a very knowledgeable, helpful, and great kernel dev: Imoseyon. Any "thanks" goes to him and not me for providing all this info.

Post #1341, just read Imoseyon's response to me:

http://rootzwiki.com/topic/31329-ke...11012/page__st__1340__p__1034933#entry1034933

Imoseyon post #1418 for recommended voltage settings per cpu type:

http://rootzwiki.com/topic/31329-ke...-kernel-v16-11012/page__st__1410#entry1042976
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] BlueCross:
This is the output I get from that command. How am I supposed to interpret this as fas, nominal, or slow?

View attachment 1650143
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] SlimSnoopOS:
Try it again after rebooting, mine works each time
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] crjjr:
Found it. For anyone else that may be looking, go to this site and follow the directions. You'll need terminal installed on your phone. It works on any GS3.

http://teamuscellular.com/Forum/top...eankernel-tw-jb-imoseyon-droidroidz-usc-v141/
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] BlueCross:
Finally, it worked.

Is there a performance difference between a slow CPU, a nominal CPU, and a fast CPU?

View attachment 1650381
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] SlimSnoopOS:
Not that I know of, you can run pretty much any kernel stock as well as adjust governors and io scheduler. The primary difference is in how much you can UC/OC or even UV/OV and how well your CPU can hold those tweaks without fear of bootlooping or instability. But as far as just flashing kernels and leaving them there, you're fine. Like I said, I'm basing this all off of what Imoseyon has said so he is WAY more knowledgeable in this area if you need additional input. This slow, nominal, fast cpu exists based on the manufacturer process so its not something you can adjust. It's permanently set with the cpu.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] prdog1:
The basis for the difference in CPUs is the same as car Manufacturing. Part's are divided by spec tolerances. The closer to spec is the difference. In car terms GM separates parts according to how close they are to spec. Fast would go in Cadillac, Nominal Buick and slow Chevrolet. They all use the same part just have closer spec tolerance. :laugh::cool:
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] SlimSnoopOS:
I can always count on this guy to drop some thorough knowledge.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] HeadlessPonch:
I tried this and got an error message :

sh: grep: not found

write: Broken pipe

I'm on stock rooted, and I granted the su permission.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] prdog1:
Have to do immediately after a reboot and some custom boot animations will keep it from working. :cool:
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] HeadlessPonch:
No custom animation. I got rid of my lock screen to get to my homescreen faster and added a shortcut to the terminal app. I started typing as soon as the app would let me and got the same error.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] x714x:
Your busybox install must be borked. Download busybox free from the playstore and do a "smart install"
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] Byonik:
As a general rule, CPUs that come off the same fab are tested and then placed into different "bins", based on how they perform at different speeds and voltages. The better performing "top bin", chips get rated and sold at the highest clock speed. The slower chips get a lower clock speed assigned, and are sold at a lower price.

This method works well for AMD and Intel, who both sell a wide range of clock speeds for a particular generation CPU at different price points. It eliminates waste by enabling them to sell the lower performing chips instead of rejecting or destroying them, and allows them to offer different price points which is beneficial from a marketing perspective.

With phones, the CPUs are often clocked the same (e.g. S2@ 1.5 GHz), but the CPUs still range in capability depending on their mfg tolerances, and in the case of our Snapdragon S2s, they are tagged accordingly. Whether you end up with a slow or fast chip in your phone is totally random, but frequently your chances of getting a faster chip increase over time as the fab process is fine tuned, and chip yields go up.

That doesn't mean you can't get a fast CPU right off the bat. For example, I pre-ordered mine on day 1 (June 6th?) and still got a fast CPU.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] HeadlessPonch:
That worked, thanks!

Now I know I'm nominal. The first line says "ACPU PVS: [1],FMAX[0]". It's different from the other 2 posted results in this thread (all 3 are actually different). What do those numbers mean?
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] Kelton Rivas:
I was lucky enough to have a fast CPU; which values on those charts do I want? I opened Kernel Turner and went to "Voltage" and it is a bunch of weird numbers--and I see something for "-1.5 across board," how many times should I hit that? I'm assuming that's how you undervolt.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] Byonik:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=36743286
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] BlueCross:
Would this apply for his aosp kernel as well? The 4.2 kernel?
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] tprophit:
Hi,

First post in this forum in a long time. Or maybe ever.

Not sure if this is the right place to ask this, I'm new to this ROM, and had a stable one in my Thunderbolt, so was away from flashing for almost a year. Just got a vz S3, rooted it as soon as I got home, and after doing some research, decided on Liquid Smooth. Downloaded Liquid-JB-v2.1-Beta3.1-d2vzw this morning, so whatever the latest version as of this morning (Jan 23) is what I flashed. Also got the correct gapps. All went well, and so far, I like what I've seen. (Thanks, developers, this has been the EASIEST flash to a new rom I've ever done.

One problem, and I hope someone can point me in the right direction, as I'm googled out on trying to find a solution.

When I go to settings, performance, current, or, maximum CPU frequency, the highest it goes it 1512. The youtube videos on this show choices up to 1900.

Can anyone point me in the right direction on this?

Thank you.

---------- Post added at 01:54 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:46 AM ----------

Just installed Setcpu, and it would not allow (nor show) any setting higher than 1512.

Thanks again for any insight.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] x714x:
You need to run a custom kernel that is overclockable. The stock kernel on liquid isnt overclockable from what I remember.

---------- Post added at 11:24 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:23 AM ----------

Ya, its hardware level so it doesnt make a difference what rom you are running.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] tprophit:
Thanks again, just flashed the KT747 kernel, am giving that a try.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] Real_JESRadio:
Thanks for this! I put up a short video showing how it's done. http://youtu.be/1opnibvPgw0
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] SlimSnoopOS:
No problem, like I said all credit goes to Imoseyon for everything I linked to. Glad it helps you and hopefully many others.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] m-cat:
It worked for me. Glad to see I got a fast one.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] tprophit:
Tried that su, got nothing.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] SlimSnoopOS:
If you read this thread, there are two ways to resolve your issue. Just make sure you're typing it correctly and only after a reboot.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] tprophit:
Bummer. Nominal....