yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] felibon:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.2 [d2spr] » Jan 24

Or press and HOLD power button and volume down for about 2 secs.

Quick question. When I apply ubber jellybean theme, it doesn't affect the keyboard. It themes everything else but the key board. Any input?

Thanks
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] evouser22:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.2 [d2spr] » Jan 24

If this ROM didn't compress my MMS I would love it 100% instead of 99.9% ): is there any other way I can do uncompressed MMS
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] dg4prez:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2044251
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] Blackmagik426:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.2 [d2spr] » Jan 24

Once you get that wifi tether, I will marry you lol
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] dg4prez:
i'm all set in that department, but thank you very much for your offer. besides, i snore.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] nocoast:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.2 [d2spr] » Jan 24

Cool man I'll give em a try. We are using a lot of those flags already throughout various mk files besides our android_build repo but I'll try using all of those thanks man
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] Karma79:
SMS temporary setup network error??

So my SMS stuff was working fine other than it not recognizing area codes in 3.1. Then a couple days ago I just stopped getting texts and when I would try to send one I get an error saying "Themessage could not be delivered due to a temporary network setup error. Please try later. Error 2112"

I just wiped everything and flashed to 3.2 and I'm getting the same thing. Anyone know a fix??

THANK!!
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] Ninja25:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.2 [d2spr] » Jan 24

Every time I take a picture or 2 I get a gallery fc and camera FC's. Any fix for this?
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] cor4twenty:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.2 [d2spr] » Jan 24

Dirty flash? I haven't had this issue. BTW newest release is awesome battery life! :) my phone is near perfect!!! Thanks a lot
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] nocoast:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.2 [d2spr] » Jan 24

Sprint wireless has been having quality of service issues lately.... That doesn't looks like a ROM problem
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] diaftia:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.2 [d2spr] » Jan 24

Is anyone missing the phone app? I don't have it but a buddy does. I had to load go dialer. Clean flash (wipe+caches).
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] EvgeniX:
nope... all good
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] felibon:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.2 [d2spr] » Jan 24

Are you also missing your stock text app? That happened to me and a reboot fixed it
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] nocoast:
Re: [ROM] [AOSP][LINARO] LIQUIDSMOOTH JellyBean [4.2.1] Beta 3.2 [d2spr] » Jan 24

Reflash make sure you flash gasps and wipe that shouldn't happen.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] dg4prez:
OP updated. A few minor changes, like built-in support for the graphics overlay lag problem.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] volkey:
Can you verify this somehow? I flashed this rom today and was getting like 45k down doing speed tests, it destroyed my battery just trying to redownload all my apps backed up from google. Both 3G and 4G were basically unusable.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] zkz90:
can the rom be dirty flashed over 3.2? (i know not preferable...saves me a lot of time)
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] hiboi214:
Yes. Just did that myself and all is well
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] EvgeniX:
What is new in 3.2.1?
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] dg4prez:
you can dirty flash but you'll need to reapply gapps as well as any other mods you may have done, like the modded dpi play store, etc.

for d2 users, the main difference is a fix for the overlay lag you get after playing games. it's been vanquished.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] zkz90:
thanks for the info.

i don't seem to be able to send mms through the stock apk on 3.2. i assume this is no different on 3.2.1?

EDIT: just kidding, i guess it was buggy for some reason...upgraded to 3.2.1 and mms started sending. (most likely because of a reboot)
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] dg4prez:
most likely it is not, no.

i'm not sure why some people are having messaging issues, to be honest.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] EvgeniX:
I think it's Sprint fail..... they like this stuff....
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] Karma79:
My wife has the same phone, same service, no ROM and hers works perfect.:(
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] EvgeniX:
You can try to backup this ROM.. Install TW and update PRL and profile and restore this ROM...
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] cor4twenty:
This. Also if you're on a different channel in the tower that could be an issue. I've had two exact phones same prl and one will have issues other won't; freaking channels are all different.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] kris54241:
Anyone got an answer for this? Thanks
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] ihugyou:
The stock kernel is the cyanogen kernel. Battery life is quite similar to that of cm10.1. I use the ktoonez kernel found in the original android development sg3 sprint forum. Used on ktoonservative setting I come home each day with about 25 to 35% battery left. I play spotify all day at work no charging and mostly 4g. So its a great ROM//kernel for increased battery life.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] evouser22:
Please make the MMS uncompressed , )): that would be awesome
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] zkz90:
the kernel is linaro optimized. if you flash ktoonz, you lose the optimization
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] dg4prez:
i posted an uncompressed MMS apk a few pages back.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] paulg1981:
You did but the is appears to be the stock tw mms unless I missed something?
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] dg4prez:
oh, didn't realize that. sorry.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] stafly17:
Yeah lte working. Dfw, Texas

XDA HD - - - ch3atc0d3

SGSIII
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] NYCHitman1:
Oh phooey. I just may have to clean flash 3.2.1 since my MMS stopped working. Very odd. Anyone else having a similar experience?
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] r.suchil2:
is there still lag after gaming and doing cpu intensive things?
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] dg4prez:
not even a little. :)
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] thearch1tect:
Where in dfw? I live in grand prairie and not getting it.

Sent from AOKP S3

-------------------------------------

Hit the "thanks" button if I helped you!
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] Karma79:
Whats the problem you are having?
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] Logix:
god i wish ktoonz kernel was linaro built

get not such good battery life wiith lk ... cuz lack of governers/oc/uv support.

any suggestions?

whats stock kernel battery life looking like?
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] xblackvalorx:
Did something in yesterday's update break noozxoide compatibility? Been using it since beta 1 and now I can't get it to work

---------- Post added at 01:27 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:27 PM ----------

Check out the team kernelizers how to thread
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] Karma79:
What is TW? Sorry, not the best with this stuff.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] EvgeniX:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1910947

TW = TouchWiz
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] clshores:
Has anyone successfully been able to get Bluetooth voice dial to work? If so can you share the process. I have tried a few of the suggestions but none seem to work. Not a game breaker but it sure would be nice if it worked.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] xblackvalorx:
Flashing acid sound mod on 1/26 breaks audio, but it worked fine on every certain prior. Any idea why?
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] dg4prez:
because we're using the old audio right now for streaming BT compatibility. we may release two versions, one with old audio/streaming BT, one with new audio/wired headset with mic - at least until BT is fixed for real.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] Karma79:
Oh I see...TY. I have to install that to update PRL? Why cant I do that with this ROM. Sorry again for being noob.

I'm really just still confused why my SMS just randomly stopped working.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] hiboi214:
Oh OK thanks for the input
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] xblackvalorx:
That would be pretty awesome, I have yet to use a2dp on my device, but I love acid sound mod.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] NYCHitman1:
Bumpity bump.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] Logix:
Ktoonz is not linaro built which defeats the purpose of using this rom
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] xblackvalorx:
Linaro optimizations still help even without a kernel compiled in full linaro.

Just saying ;)

Every one thinks there linaro experts after everything in this thread the other day lol
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] nocoast:
A friendly public service announcement from our favorite kernel Dev, morfic on the note of googles gcc 4.7 vs linaro

" gcc4.7 by google is faster on integer tests when compared to linaro, so on N4 with a powerful gpu, google wins, i would compare both on note2

cat /proc/version

on the kernel you just built" -morfic.... BigwillyG and friends got a response for this? ^_^ /endofinvestigation

" plus google merges more linaro code into their gcc

soon linaro will fizzle into a buzzword, more than it already is

you may come back to a wall of words" -morfic
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] hiboi214:
I was wondering if the Devs could make a liquid smooth ROM with different audio drivers for use with acid mod. It would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] EJayMz:
I connect Bluetooth to my Roadster 2 just fine.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] xblackvalorx:
My response is I've never even heard of that guy so, who cares? Also we don't have note 2s

Also, still on that? Talk about being a sore loser.

well

1st: i thought YOU said google and linaro were the SAME

even after 20+ PAGES of posts on xda proving that linaro is NOT te same as google, you still insisted it was.

your last post after i posted a DIFF of your linaro and google builds still told users that the 2 compilers were the same

---so, now are you finally admitting you were full of it

2nd: YES, google may out perform linaro - UNLESS the code is optimized for linaro

most kernels, including morfic's includes linaro "fixes" so that the compile complete

setting CFLAGS and -O3 does not give you linaro optimization

morfic's kernel is NOT linaro optimized, but does contain linaro fixes. these fixes do

nothing more than allow the compile to complete.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] Karma79:
That's because it was fixed since I posted that.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] bigwillyg:
@nocoast my response is pretty much what he ^^ said...Except without the name calling :)
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] nocoast:
If you truly want to open this can of worms OK let's do it. My point from the beginning was that googles GCC for 'all intents and purposes' i.e. optimization of the ROM (cuz that's why you'd use linaro right?) Was the same...Now the findings are such that not only does googles GCC 4.7 contain ALL OF THE PERTAINENT OPTIMIZATIONS THAT LINARO HAS....but IN FACT IT OUTPERFORMS THE LINARO TOOLCHAIN. I'm full of it? Well mister 'xblackvalorx' I don't even feel like spelling it out...All of the cflags and optimizations you can use with linaro ARE INDEED compatible with googles GCC 4.7 ....please stop trying to.make this a pissing match of who's right or wrong, all ive intended to do here from day one was state what I know to be the truth....To discredit morfic because you haven't heard of him is quite foolish as he's an insanely talented developer and knows more than both you and I...in theory and in practice (with regards to android and specifically toolchains) His research is based off of pure mathematical fact, not opinion so for the final time. I A.think its fair to say that googles GCC 4.7 is 'linaro optimized+' (note the + as in better, something I was not fully aware of at my original time.of posting) that B. For all intents and purposes anyone using the Google/Linaro GCC 4.7 has every right to claim it as 'linaro' seeing as the end product results in as high if not higher level of optimization than the 'official' toolchain and C. The note2 just so happened to be the phone we were referencing, he also refs the nexus4 which has a strikingly similar boardconfig to the sgs3...ultimately again the point of the matter is that googles 4.7 offers all of the same optimizations as linaro (which I stated on numerous occasions) and then some for all practical purposes...this discussion is over...call me whatever you'd like but please put down the the oil burning lanterns and stakes as this isn't a witchhunt. The point was that we were trying to help come to a conclusion as to which toolchain performed better on android. Now that its been settled that googles is the winner can we sleep in peace? Or is there something more you guys have to say? :confused:
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] bigwillyg:
One, it wasn't me who hasn't heard of morfic, that was the other guy.

Two, wow, I'm not sure I want to justify any of that with a response. Linaro is like a muscle car with a manual transmission (you gotta know how to drive it and how to use it), Google is a fast car with an auto tranny (I think you know where I'm going with this). I have used linaro and I have used Google. Once you know how, you see how much better it is.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] xblackvalorx:
All my post about morfic meant was he develops on a different device, and the post was talking about two quad core devices with faster gpus, it didn't much pertain to this thread. I didn't say anything to discredit him, simply its validity to our devices.

And sorry I came off as a little grumpy to see this start again.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] VikingoRMCF:
Take this flirting to PMs.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] nocoast:
Actually he develops on the msm8960 domestic sgs3 along with a host of other devices ...his findings were based off of research he did with the krait/adreno combo which is what your both your phone and the n4 is using..the adreno in the s3 is not significantly less powerful than that in the n4

---------- Post added at 01:09 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:07 AM ----------

Sorry but they are equally as strict with the source my friend...

---------- Post added at 01:10 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:09 AM ----------

Considering I spent all weekend cranking out linaro builds because of this discussion id say its very pertinent...

---------- Post added at 01:11 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:10 AM ----------

And I addressed xblackvalorx regarding morfic, was not directed at you my friend...
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] xblackvalorx:
Specifically named note 2 and n4, both different chipsets.

Much higher powered combo of krait/adreno.

Your post also state Google's did better on the faster gpu which we lack.

Whether that's true or not your contradicting your self.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] nocoast:
You don't lack a powerful GPU the adreno in the s3 is still world class and scores excellent in benches...if you'd like to see a comparison of how the Google tool chain performs on the domestic s3 I'll have morfic run some benches tomorrow so we can have specific numbers. Also, reread the context morfic only suggested that I run tests on my Mali because of his findings on adreno...the adreno in the n4 does not run rings around the s3 by any means. I owned both phones and they bench quite similarly in GPU tests...
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] Blackmagik426:
I'm quite tired of the arguing folks lol if you don't like it then don't come here simple as that, these devs do this for "free" so let them do what they feel is best, if you don't like it then create your own rom, use linaro or whatever the heck else and go kick rocks with open toed shoes...

On a brighter note, this Rom runs great and I look forward to your updates. Plus this LTE has me flying :) to date on this billing period I have about 80Gigs used haha

---------- Post added at 01:28 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:26 AM ----------

Couple days old
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] bigwillyg:
It has nothing to do with his Rom, I'm sure it's great. This has to do with advertising linaro when in fact it wasn't being used, compliant and optimized are not the same thing. Actually using the linaro with proper optimizations produces a much better product than using Google's tool chain with basic optimizations. Like I had said previously, a whole different beast.

Nothing against morfic, but if he doesn't the linaro specific optimizations with the linaro compiler he won't see what kind of a difference it really makes.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] ihugyou:
Why don't you just go to settings and performance and grant su permission and put it on power save?
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] life:
Sounds like a matter of opinion, linaro better than Google, Google is better than linaro.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] GETCASHMONEY:
Well obviously we dont care or we wouldnt keep downloading and/or dknating. The rom got much faster once they started advertising linaro so they are doing something right. Oh, and it doesnt say linaro optimized in the op, just linaro. So if its just linaro compliant thats not false advertising. Just pm him if you have to drag it on. I would rather hear from people who actually enjoy this rom or need help.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] Custodian:
Thats like saying odex vs deo-dex. But in this particular situation. There's a clear difference in performance output.

Its like comparing Gatorade to sprite. Or the u.s. military to a Frankenstein mob.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] wiseguyy:
Yes Linaro works just fine.

I can't seem to find the GPS on off any thoughts?
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] TheDudeAbides:
This thread sucks. Thanks, guys.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] GETCASHMONEY:
Go to settings and turn on power widget and it should be one of the options.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] dg4prez:
Take the argument elsewhere. It's a retard carnival in this thread now, all because of that stupid word. Go to email or PMs. I'm tired of this linaro police crap. Nocoast and bigwilly can actually speak with some clarity, but xvalorwhatever, go install AOKP or something and jog on.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] nocoast:
Morfic uses a ton of linaro optimizations my friend, please look at his source before you make assumptions... He's on bitbucket..Morfic was specifically referring to his experience with both toolchains and using the same set of optimizations on both. Could you please give me a list of Cflags that can be used with the linaro toolchain that are incompatible with googles?
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] bigwillyg:
A couple of pages back I posted up a screenshot or two with the linaro only cflags. If you do add them you may have quite a bit more errors to sort out, especially if you also remove the flags I posted previously as well.

Again, beware, the flags in the screenshot will crash on Google's toolchain.

As for the rest of the users, there is noticeable gain from this and you will love how much better it runs. So trust me. It's worth enduring this conversation.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] nocoast:
Paranoid android is using a bunch of the cflags you've listed on googles GCC 4.7 so I'm sorry but I don't buy this. Sorry I just don't. Can you show me.some documentation of the incompatible Cflags? I'll post the PA cflags in a moment.

https://github.com/ParanoidAndroid/android_build/commits/jellybean

That's a touch of them. I have not been able to find any cflags that work with linaro that don't work with googles...since you claim your such a linaro expert I'd really appreciate seeing which SPECIFIC flags cannot be used on googles that can be used on linaro...and if your saying that they will cause errors that doesn't invalidate the Google tool chain or its support of the flags, its just a testament to the code not being compliant with the flags (rules)
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] zkz90:
if i remember correctly, the unofficial cm10.1 build has both the BT reverts and working headset controls
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] bigwillyg:
Give me a few to pull them all up. They will cause errors because the code needs to be corrected, but if used on Google's compiler it will fail because it won't recognize the flags.

Keep in mind you would need to remove any and all "-wno" and "-fno" flags in all makefile and android.mk files so no errors or warnings are bypassed or ignored.

You should also add "-werror" so it stops on the warnings as well.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] nocoast:
I know how to use the toolchain my bro...I'm interested to see which flags Google will straight up deny
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] xblackvalorx:
So basically your just trying to insult me when in this latest bit my part was minimal, I thought about arguing on but I'm tired of the subject
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] jayharper08:
I think we are all tired of the subject.

I'm mobile right now, but if you don't have anything to say that can help with DEVELOPMENT of this project, then move on.

--Jay-- Moderating from the Slimmed™ GSIII
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] ioos:
I've seen a couple of posts mentioning issues with the Chronus widget, but no resolutions. The settings under Lockscreen > Clock don't seem to affect the widget. I removed the standard clock and added Chronus. I've got it on both my home screen and lock screen; neither changes. Specifically I want it to use Fahrenheit instead of Celsius. The "Use Metric" box is not checked.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] EvgeniX:
by default its not Chronus widget... you need to add new Chronus widget and delete default one....
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] ioos:
Right, I did that. I'm using the Chronus widget; not the stock clock.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] robertm2011:
Oddly, my Chronus widget had started set on Farenheit. Late yesterday, I noticed that it had switched to Centigrade on it's own (?!); about a half-hour ago I saw that it has gone back to Farenheit. Go figure.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] princem131:
Bluetooth is acting weird randomly shutting off and then getting stuck turning off. Anyone else having this issue? Any suggestions for a fix?

Positive Vibrations
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] bdsullivan:
I have had some weird bluetooth issues as well. I could not get it to connect to my moga controller and today I had to reboot in order to shut it off.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Xparent ICS Blue Tapatalk 2
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] GETCASHMONEY:
I haven't had any Bluetooth issues. Can't think of any issues at all, actually.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] princem131:
This was one of my biggest issues with Cm10.1 but seemed fixed initially on this rom. Might just need more time to settle in.

Positive Vibrations
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] bdsullivan:
It's been 2 days. Lol. I am going to do a full wipe and reflash to see if that fixes it.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Xparent ICS Blue Tapatalk 2
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] mar.ioo:
Ohh wow, so this linaro discussion is over right? Thank God!! Dwnloading this now!
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] dianoga7:
Does anyone else have a problem with the home button not behaving cirrectly when car docked? When my phone is docked, the home button doesn't bring up the dock application like it should. It just takes me back to my default launcher.

I've tried a couple of different car dock apps and they all behave the same way.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] MassStash:
Linaro sounds pretty dev related to me. Specially when there's been a bunch of people frontin about it. As far as the rom goes running wise tho, things are going very well for me thus far. Flashed last night with ktoonsez's kernel and this thing is flying! So far haven't even really run into any 4.2.1 compatibility outside either. Very stoked about this is runnin!

~SGSIII'ed runnin' Task AOKP
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy S III] Custodian:
You're definitely losing the linaro optimization kernel wise. But hey kt kernel linaro or not is superb.