yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] heywheelie:
Can someone point me to the 4.2.2. build 8 download and slim gapps please? I checked the download link in the OP but it points to the 4.3 version.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Twiq:
they are moved to old releases section.. Here

gapps are inside the addons folder
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Kachongui:
Hi guys, I love stable ROMs, don't like updating every 12 hours and I want to use Apolo kernel, ¿is this my ROM?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] m1trand1r:
hm....may be...:good:....but 4.3.1 is rock stable if you ask me:good:....it's daily driver:D

Beam-ed through your pineal gland via//Android 4.3.1:p//
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Kachongui:
And one more thing, does it include halo?? I haven't found it as a feature...
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Misk77:
This rom is rock stable in my opinion. Like rkoby says, daily use rom. if you read, learn what you are flashing before you use its easier for everyone. You got so much other good things in this rom...
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] m1trand1r:
no....there's no HALO feature and there won't be one:)

I said that 4.3.1 is daily driver:p:p

4.2.2 is obviously stable....but....4.3.1 is waaaay...faster:D

Beam-ed through your pineal gland via//Android 4.3.1:p//
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Kachongui:
Are these known issues still here? I just want to know what I'm gonna install.

Ouh, I'll try it anyway. I want to know why everybody says that it's stable as rock.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Misk77:
Yep, booth are good for daily.. But did read little 2 fast. But the statement are good for booth :p
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] m1trand1r:
Because it really is Rock stable rom:D:good:...

Beam-ed through your pineal gland via//Android 4.3.1:p//
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] :
I am looking for build 6 .

Can sameone help plz

Thx
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Conny84:
I don't know if some user has a build ver 6 on his hd/sd and is willing to upload it for you; but just to make sure: You are looking for slim bean 4.2.2? Ver. 8 is latest and stable, why u want v.6? You might as well progess to latest Slimbean 4.3, which is considered stable by many users.

Plz use xda search and get yourself an update, especially on android versions :laugh::good:

PS just browse slimroms.net , the page ist pretty good, also take a look at "old releases - not supported".
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] FPSUsername:
Any antutu scores of this slimbean rom?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] thout:
slim 4.2.2 v8 - 11516 with latest antutu version
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] h4wk3y3:
Since we are already talking about this. I always get quite low Antutu scores.

I did a clean installation of the newest 4.3.1 Slim Rom and my phone is a lot faster than with the other rom I used before. Still, I only get an Antutu score of 10441. Any suggestions why my score is lower than the usual Galaxy S2 score? Did I just get worse hardware when I bought it?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] maxbluz:
4.2.2 GAPPS'

Hi, I want to try SlimRom again, after few failures, so I'm thinking to install 4.2.2 , since this is STABLE version.

I found link to download this version on SlimRom page but can't find 4.2.2 Gapps. Can anyone provide link, or I can flash 4.3?

Edit: I have found it.

I need recommendation, should I stick with stable 4.2.2, or I should try 4.3 build2?

I'm asking it because I tried 4.3 build2 several times, but every time when I change DPI to 240 and reboot phone, it stuck on Samsung logo.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] 1username4thisforum:
Can someone that knows, and only someone that knows answer my question please.

Plllllease do not reply and say I'm not sure, I think, I guess, I assume, etc, etc, etc.

Let someone that actually knows answer please.

When installing Slimbean, and it says

"mount and format system and data"

Is it notifying me that it is performing those actions

OR

am I supposed to mount and format system and data?

If so, am I supposed to mount system/data after formatting them, because after you format them they are unmounted again.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] h4wk3y3:
I figured you might need more information.

Kernel-Version is 3.0.80+

Slim Version is 4.3.build.2-OFFICIAL-1334

So does anyone know why my Antutu scores are below the usual scores for the i9100?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] HardCorePawn:
I think that it is notifying you that you should have done it but I guess it might be doing it for you... :p

seriously tho, it is actually mounting and formating /system and mounting /data... you can read it in the install script if you open the rom .zip and navigate to the META-INF/com/google/android/ dir and read the updater-script... it is plaintext.

ui_print("Format and Mount System, Mount Data...");
unmount("/system");
format("ext4", "EMMC", "/dev/block/mmcblk0p9", "0", "/system");
mount("ext4", "EMMC", "/dev/block/mmcblk0p9", "/system");
mount("ext4", "EMMC", "/dev/block/mmcblk0p10", "/data");

Because benchmarks are fairly meaningless to be honest... I'm not sure why everyone worries about getting an extra 1000 points in Antutu... at the end of the day, the real test is using your phone day to day and seeing how it performs. Sure if Antutu came up with a score of 2000 when everyone is getting 10000+ then you'd have something to worry about...

My opinion? Stop worrying so much and enjoy your phone... if you're that worried about benchmark scores... go buy an N5 or an S4 or something :rolleyes:
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] h4wk3y3:
Thanks for the answer. I wasn't worried, just curious :) I am enjoying my phone very much and it is very smooth with slimrom. hence, no worries ;)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] maxbluz:
I have installed 4.2.2 version before hour ago. So far everything fine. I got notification from Slim center to upgrade on 4.3 version.

Is it recommended? Should I just upgrade it or full wipe again?

---------- Post added at 10:36 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:33 PM ----------

One more thing : there is no calendar app. Does anyone have slim calendar or I just install Google calendar from app store?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] maxbluz:
AIO Gapps or Minimal gapps?

OK, I have decided to switch to 4.3 build2 version.

I am not sure can I flash AIO gapps or I must flash minimal gapps?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] h4wk3y3:
I just followed their instructions and everything worked: http://www.slimroms.net/index.php/installation
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] maxbluz:
RE:

I saw those instructions, and this line is little confusing: "At the moment, just use

Slim gapps

, there are problems with other gapps atm (incompatible or outdated libs in other actual gapps packages)".

By "Slim gapps" they mean that I shouldn't install gapps from another rom? Or they ment to install "minimal gapps"?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] h4wk3y3:
The way I understood it, you are not supposed to use gapps from another source. Use the ones they provide. I used the Slimgapps AIO, so not the minimal one. Have not had a problem or reboot since the installation about a week ago.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] maxbluz:
RE: Problem - again

Damn! I tried again, few minutes ago, with same procedure I did every time I flash custom rom. Again same problem: after change DPI stuck on Samsung logo. Tried wipe cache and dalvik in Recovery mod, and stuck on recovery too. Same procedure with Slimrom 4.2.2 worked just fine.

I have noticed that instalation of rom was quite fast, so maybe this could be the problem. It lasted maybe about 10-15 secs. Maybe downloaded file was corrupted.

I will probably try again, but for now I must rest from trying with Slim, so I have installed latest NeatRom. Great piece of work.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Twiq:
thats strange.. changing DPI to 160 or 240 never caused bootloops or other issues on my device (slimbean 4.2.2/4.3)

have u tried full wipe and formatting /system/ and /data/ manually before flashing the rom and minimal gapps?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] maxbluz:
I always make full wipe, but didn't install minimal gapps. I have installed AIO gapps
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] mk4588:
WIFI Direct

Hello everyone!!! Is there any opportunity to use wifi direct in Slimbean?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] RusherDude:
Tested this rom for close a month on a i9100.

After 27 days, suddently the device rebooted, shown me the welcome! screen like after flashing a rom, and the internal sd card DCIM folder was empty. I had blocked the updates from SlimBean and such..

Good stuff I backup everything, be aware of this.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] toy_story:
Hello, can anyone post a link to ROM [4.1.2]Slim Bean - SGS2 [v3.1][All Languages]
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Scorpoid:
I had a very good experience with slimkat on nexus s, sadly it's not the same with the i9100 ... so many problems and reboots
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] ze7zez:
If someone was looking for the original ROM 4.2.2 on the slimroms.net site, it will not find it.

But it is here:

Slim-i9100-4.2.2.build.8-OFFICIAL.zip sha1 43b1e77a6a5bd40cdcb5ef6cd13d57341fcf755a
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] iAnoop:
Intensely fast. I am now using my galaxy SII as backup and as GPS device. This ROM just brought back almighty Galaxy SII from dead right on Christmas eve.

Thanks a ton. :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] s.e.v.e.n.k.h.a.n:
no download link☹️☹️☹️
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] HardCorePawn:
As already mentioned (several times), with stock kernel:

USB Tether = Working OK

WiFi Tether = Working OK

Bluetooth Tether = Working OK (I got this working on a Vaio laptop today... I thought it was broken... but it works fine :victory:)

If you're not on stock kernel... this isn't my problem...

I can only guess that DorimanX has been playing with WiFi drivers again... best to check the DorimanX support thread... give the guy some logcats of switching on WiFi Tethering and trying to connect a laptop or whatever to your phone's AP.

Not sure what you sent... or where... but I got nothing... :confused:

Due to changes in format of JB Lockscreen (ie. the widget box at the top) there just isn't room on lockscreen on such a small screen for 8 targets anymore... unless you're not going to complain about the bottom icons being sliced off :p We are looking at it... but at the moment, the only solution is buy a device with a bigger screen ;)

Not sure how we missed the home button thing... I didn't notice as it is the middle of summer here in NZ... not much need for gloves at the moment so I can easily answer with slide ;) I've just gone and implemented this... should hopefully be in the next release :good:

As for ascending ringtone... I'm really not too sure why this doesn't work?? I've spent ages looking at it... coz I really like it too. It doesn't work on CM either as far as I can tell... My only suggestion is to try one of the free apps that implement this like "Crescendo Volume"... seems to work pretty well and offers more options than the default ascending ring functionality... :good:

Not sure why this happened... I'll look into it... in the meantime... try "Voltage Control" from the play store... it is free... and it works :) Also, has a nifty "reset everything from CWM Recovery" feature... so if your phone doesn't boot after messing with voltages you can just boot into recovery, flash the zip, and it removes all the Voltage Control settings :) (also... if you're using DorimanX, can't you just use stweaks?? :confused:)

What network provider are you using? Might be a badly configged APN or something... or maybe they've screwed up on their end... I don't have any issues with the timezone...

As for WiFi tether on DorimanX, Like I said above... if you're having issues with other kernels... you'll need to go talk to the kernel dev concerned (provide them with appropriate logcats etc)... it works on stock, so as far as I can tell, it isn't a ROM issue.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] shuki.mitz:
Can someone please provide a link to the stock Kernel?

I installed Dorimanx but need to have Wifi Hotspot...

Thanks
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] AbyssTrion:
Not sure if this has been asked before, but everytime I change my Profile from "Sound+Vibrate" to "Vibrate" and then back,

I don't have any Vibration. I use "Sound Manager V2" to get Vibration back.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Didgesteve:
openPdroid

openPdroid patches available for the 4.2 RC1

Find out more about openPdroid manager here

or

PDroid 2.0 here

Both can be used as GUIs for the openPdroid framework. But you must have the rom patched before trying to install the .apk
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] HardCorePawn:
Here you go... for future reference... all you (or anyone else) need to do is take the boot.img from the original SlimRom install .zip that you want to get the stock kernel for and put it into this .zip... overwriting the boot.img that is there. Then go flash in CWM.

This was just a kernel_flasher.zip I found on XDA... they have this really useful search function ;)

Have no issues with vibration... How exactly are you changing from Sound+Vibrate to Vibrate and back? Using an actual "Profile"? Quick Settings Toggle? Power Widget?

And which vibration do you lose? All haptic feedback (like touching "menu" or "back" buttons?) or only when the phone is ringing/notifications/SMS etc?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] AbyssTrion:
Thanks for the fast reply, I change the Settings through Qutick Settings Toggle. I only lose Notification+Ringing Vibration.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] HardCorePawn:
So you have configured the QS toggle to only have "Vibrate" and "Sound+Vibrate"???

I've tried like this... and can switch back and forth without any issue? I also tried with the default settings (ie. with all 4 options ticked)... and can switch to anything I like and vibration always comes back when I change to "Vibrate" or "Sound+Vibrate"...

Your sig says you are on DorimanX... if so, can you please try with stock kernel?

If it works OK on stock... then you'll need to seek advice in DorimanX thread... don't forget the logcats! ;)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] AbyssTrion:
Yea..well, strange :D

Alright, I guess I'll try it like this then :)

Thanks HCP!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] angus1225:
Thankx a lot for your answers! I was waiting for someone to throw me some light on them....

I dont use widgets in lockscreen(till now), but i will manage with 5 shortcuts

I will try "crescendo Volume" meanwhile not working on the rom....

I went back to my old Slim 3.1... I was having trouble with some apps, like "wifi timer" (i use it a lot, its a very good app to stop wifi automatically and save some bat... wifi drains a lot!!!). It keeps doing FC and i dont know why....

On the other hand, camera is great, status bar, and all the nwe thing, and the speed is great!

Maybe I try in the next release of slim, but defenetly, not changing slim for any other!

Thankx for your work!
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] HardCorePawn:
You're welcome... which WiFi Timer app is causing issues? This one or this one??

They both seem to work fine?? :confused:

perhaps you should take a logcat of the FC and contact the application author??
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] angus1225:
Re: [ROM][4.2.1]Slim Bean - I9100 [RC1]

[/COLOR]

They both seem to work fine?? :confused:

perhaps you should take a logcat of the FC and contact the application author??[/QUOTE]

The second one, of Laurent Sebag (I recommend it)

Try it...set it wifi activation on, then activate wifi, the app should ask the time you want the wifi to turn off , and let the app do its work. By the time indicated the wifi must turn off, but instead of yhat wifi tmer fc.

Sometimes it works, sometimes not....it's weird...

Now I'm on 3.1 with no fc, all working fine, so logcat is impossible...

Thankx again!

Enviado desde mi GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] thawizard:
pardon if this has been mentioned, but search is disabled atm and google is not helpful.

did anyone try go launcher on 4.2.1 yet?

go launcher seems not running properly on slim bean 4.2.1

widgets with transparency flicker when moving/scrolling, resizing will draw ghost images and couple other errors.

not sure whether its from slim bean or go launcher. it hasn't happened before though, all fine at 4.1.2, errors started with 4.2.1.

---------- Post added at 03:10 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:06 PM ----------

another thing, on top of notification drawer there is a date showing. clicking on it opens google calendar.

i think there should be an option to choose calendar app. and if google calendar is not installed, it will fc.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] angus1225:
Re: [ROM][4.2.1]Slim Bean - I9100 [RC1]

I also noticed that but with novalauncher...and working fine in 412

Other thing I notice is that sopcast 0.9 in 4.2.1 works fine, but in 4.1.2 fc, and the early version works with no sound.

Enviado desde mi GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] flashxml:
My new secondary boot rom
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] aryan1312:
Jst a Request from the dev team of slimbean (or thread handler) please put the date of latest update on the thread title ... bcoz in the index of "rom thread" the Slimbean is listed under "no available update date" which make it look that rom is not updating regularly...
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] CanadaJim:
Working fine here.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] ciquta:
Will it be fixed or is it regular?

---------- Post added at 11:11 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:14 PM ----------

After a whole day in battery stats I have Google Maps eating 58% of the power consumption?!? :eek::confused:

I used it just for a couple of mins browsing the map
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] GaboWinter:
Re: [ROM][4.2.1]Slim Bean - I9100 [RC1]

Well, your point it's valid and actually is expected that the titles shows the date, also it's more easy to me update the index but also on that section there are many ROMs that are updated constantly and also have nightly releases, my point is: It isn't so bad but yes it's not ideal.

Just as suggestion, If you of anyone else wanna see the recently updated threads also check the latest posts on my indexes, I resume the changes always after an update.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] k4bbe:
Re: [ROM][4.2.1]Slim Bean - I9100 [RC1]

You probably didn't close/kill the app and it was running in the background.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] CanadaJim:
Re: [ROM][4.2.1]Slim Bean - I9100 [RC1]

Either that or you have "my location" turned on...
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] cabbyz:
started facing a weird issue today...

When using my phone (either auto brightness or manually) the phone still suddenly go really dim and i cant bring up the brightness again until i reboot.

Happened in random situations (browser, home screen and instagram) so i dont think its app related..

Using Siyah v5 at the moment, and this usually happens after about 10-15 minutes of usage, it will go very very dim and the only thing that works is a reset
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] HardCorePawn:
Re: [ROM][4.2.1][19/01]Slim Bean - I9100 [RC1]

Done! :)

Does it do this on stock? If not, then not SlimRom issue and you'll need to talk to kernel dev... Suggest getting logcats when it happens so the Dev can investigate...

Sent from my SlimBean pwned GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] aryan1312:
For those who is having battery issue check this out (screenshot is added) using siyah v5 vsync latest version .... having 27h+ usage and still 33% still remaining (1 night full standby and 1 day full heavy usage) what more can some1 ask for the rom :)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] foccacia:
1. is this the one??? Siyah v5.0.1

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1555259

2. if i do not like Siyah kernel n like to flash back the stock kernel, i just flash Slim rom over n will restore the kernel?

3. how do i flash Siyah kernel as i have not done it before? is it just download the zip version n flash it in recovery?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] aryan1312:
here is the link download for Siyah-v5-MCM-i9100-vsync_sysfs-20130122.zip : http://sourceforge.net/projects/cm10i9100vsync/files/kernel/

download it then flash the zip in the recovery mode... yes u have to flash the slim rom again to restore the kernel... i don't remember which is stock kernel for slim rom its been long since i am using slim rom... :P sorry for it...
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] foccacia:
the link u gave me is different from the link i found? users reported siyah cause wifi issues, will your version cause this problem?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] shiningwizard:
how do update to rc1 from beta 2?

How do I upgrade from beta 2 to rc1? More specifically, is it possible to upgrade without wiping? I've already configured everything and find it a hassle to setup everything again... And, thanks for the ROM! It's great! Was having random reboots until I update the kernel.

And, if only I could have multi windows... ;)
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Weeboab:
Re: [ROM][4.2.1][19/01]Slim Bean - I9100 [RC1]

Just flash over the top of beta 2 no need for wipe
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] AbyssTrion:
Do you run on Stock Settings?

Or did you modify it in STweaks? I'm currently on Siyah 5 VSync too but I never got such a good Battery Life :D ?

P.S.

Whats your On Screen Time?
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] bjunky:
Re: [ROM][4.2.1][19/01]Slim Bean - I9100 [RC1]

Deep sleep is really amazing with this kernel as well. Lost only 1% this night.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] HANDSY:
Re: [ROM][4.2.1][19/01]Slim Bean - I9100 [RC1]

Agreed, this ROM is so good its stopping me flash the new JB ROM and I like to flash...a lot.
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] Twiq:
Re: [ROM][4.2.1][19/01]Slim Bean - I9100 [RC1]

the stock voltage control on the performance tab and what i posted earlier wasn't a biggie. And yes i'm using stweaks' feature to UV the voltages, but it has caps, for example the minimum frequency (100mhz) on my device can be tuned to 775 mV without SOD (and yes i know that this could damage my cpu), and on stweaks for minimum frequency is capped at 850 mV.

I appreciate the suggestion about using voltage control to UV, but i'm also commited to keep the "slim" idea. if i can use anything stock (beside kernel) then i'm sticking to it :)

I really love Slim roms so much that i didnt even bother flashing the slim gapps to keep the sizes low :D instead i used the NOGAPPS project (cant post links since i'm currently mobile, will do this later)

about automatic timezone thingy, i think it's fixed automatically after 5-6 restarts and 1 time sync from NTP. will keep an eye on this. And BTW I'm on +7 zone.

about wifi tethering issue with other kernel isn't a problem for me since I'm on Unlimited Data Plan. and my other devices rarely needs internet.

My issues were meant for feedback only, anything you (devs) put on your rom is what i'm using, and I'm not complaining or worse pushing the devs to fix this for me :D and I've been with Slim since it's on it's early stages. There's nothing that can make me flash other rom unless it's one of Slim devs' releases :D

Great Job Krarvind, HCP and other Slim devs for making this masterpiece! really thank you guys
[Galaxy S II Original Android Development] polishpt:
Hey, first few hours on this rom and I'm really! impressed!!

Great work devs.

One question though, I've installed swiftkey, is there a chance to make it bigger? Because of lower dpi keyboard is not as comfortable to use as I would like it to be

Thanks