yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] Der Straßenapotheker:
AW: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

tap build nr several times (i think 7 times)

Gesendet von meinem GT-P7310
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] lallolu:
What!!!

Thank you very much. I thought you were messing with me when I read your reply. But then I looked around to see if no one was seeing that I was actually doing as you suggested. But to my surprise, I saw the message that I was 2 clicks from being a developer. Now I have the option.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] chienline:
Yeah, it's hidden for the for the sake of non-tweaky users :D

For me, battery discharging is good. l left the wifi on and standby with screen off for 8 hours sleeping time and it consumed only 2 to 3 percents of my battery :)
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] jankhner:
Re: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

Do I have to type those adb commands if i try this rom but want to restore my nandroid backup of ics rom after that?
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] chienline:
Yes you have to, adb from a PC. But I guess you'll never go back to ICS if you have experienced the performance :D

HDMI output rotation is not that crucial to some people but Dev is working on it.

Weird boot animation is no harm at all. On the other side you get a very responsive performance compared to ICS :)
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] jankhner:
Re: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

Ok, thanks for the info. Actually I tried cm10.1. earlier but the leaked(?) ics actually felt a lot smoother.. But I'll try again!
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] _strauch_:
AW: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

removed and added to Discussion Thread.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] schaeaef:
Would it be possible to create a version for the P7320 version?
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] chienline:
I never change any bootloader. Just installed what comes with the rom. stock ics I've tried is the HK version, not the US version.

Make sure you have the same apps and widgets installed and the same widgets applied on homescreen when you compare roms. Because some widgets are very power hungry :)

So far, I vote for this M2 build for the best performance :highfive:
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] Brendo:
Yep, M2 has great performance. Not so good with battery though
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] _strauch_:
Yes i have the same installed. Sometimes with CM my Tab didn't wake up, or need 5-10 secs until it response after a wakeup.

I think i have to test more. thanks for your answer. Maybe a make a video to show you what i mean.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] zmagas1:
Re: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

+1
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] lallolu:
True about the battery.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] C-o-M:
AW: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

11 days in standby with WLAN on and 24% remaining :cool:
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] prince93:
C-o-M, do you recommend a certain version of the bootloader to be installed in use with this rom ? as pershoot recommends for CM10?
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] Brendo:
I came straight over from cm10 where i'd get about 3 days using it every now and then and losing 1% took ages, now it loses several precent really quickly. Not bad battery life, but has been better :)
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] nexus_g:
Re: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

Hi, can I use nandroid backup on cwm to go back to cm10? Thanks
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] pescorilo:
Re: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

It is draining more on real use, not standby. For example in mc4, 30mins of play drains 5 to 8 percent when in cm10 was 3 to 5. BUT the performance is much better,so the draining is maybe normal. Is the GPU oc ?
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] martin707:
Re: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

Our tablet is susceptible to the battery bug. It is likely you have that after flashing cm10.1 which has its own kernel. Search the forums on how to recalibrate the battery.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] C-o-M:
AW: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

Why not?
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] C-o-M:
AW: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

Of course it is possible. But I can't do because I don't own one. It's a completely different hardware.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] C-o-M:
AW: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

It's not a recommendation; you have to use the right bootloader. But you will see immediately after startup if you have the correct one. Every ROM that uses the ICS kernel needs this bootloader (I.e. stock ICS, CM10, CM10.1 and probably every ROM since the first ICS leak). AFAIR the only tabs with a bad bootloader are the UK models.

Tl;dr: if you don't run honeycomb, you already have the correct bootloader.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] Der Straßenapotheker:
AW: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

Can i use wingray gapps for m2 build ?

Gesendet von meinem GT-P7310
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] C-o-M:
AW: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

Yes. But then video recording will be broken.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] safariking:
need to do the adb commands first i guess
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] rosdol:
UB charging - again

Hi,

can there anyone in the know please tell us how we should enable USB charging for build M2?

muchos grazias...

Erik

Erik
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] pippone121263:
go to root-sys-class-power_supply-battery-force_usb_charging and change 0 to 1 (I use FX explorer)

hope it can help
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] nexus_g:
Re: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

So going back to cm10, need to do adb first then do nandroid recovery? Please give advice, cause I don't want to brick my tab. Thanks.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] rosdol:
offcourse you did - Thanx

Erik
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] sbE:
is it me or getting cm 10.1 slower and slower!? i'm a first day user of com's cm 10.1 but now many things are very slow...for instance google play, installation and update of apps, chrome, keyboard (lags during typing). games seems to work fine.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] C-o-M:
AW: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

You will not brick your tab. It's just the files on the sdcard being at the wrong place and you'll have to move them (manually or using the adb commands)
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] nexus_g:
Re: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

One more question: can you move the folders manually using any file manager after flashing back to cm10? Thanks.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] gumsle:
Hi all!

Coming from stock firmware 4.0.4UELP_4.1_PRO (with kernel A1-1.7.3) i flashed this rom just because i was excited how things work at the moment. Flashing was no problem, of course i first made a nandroid backup of my system with the recommended CWM6.0.2.7. CM10.1 M2 worked really very smooth and so far there were nothing for me to complain about :good: except one thing: i was not able to connect to my Dreambox with the app Dreamdroid. Thats why i want to go back to my backuped version. But unfortunately i cant get it to work. When i want to restore it only says: "no files found". So i read a bit and found the advice in the second post to use adb in order to solve this. But somehow it doesnt work with adb.

cd /sdcard/ works fine

rm -rf legacy/ this line is just repeated when i hit enter

rm -rf obb/ this line is just repeated when i hit enter

mv -f 0/* . answer is: failed on '-f' - No such file or directory

So i have no idea whats wrong or what to do ...:crying:

Thank for your great work!
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] upconvert:
mv is a linux command to move files. The -f is a modifier, which tells the system to force the move without backtalk. Make sure there is no space between the - and the f. It can return errors if you don't have write permissions on the root directory.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] C-o-M:
AW: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

Boot into CM10.1, and move the folder /data/media/0/clockworkmod to /data/media (works with the CM file manager in root mode). Reboot to recovery and you'll be able to restore.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] shiko80:
Did you also compare it to AOSP 4.1.2. Is CM10.1 already faster?
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] prince93:
Re: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

@C-o-M

About the issue reported before regarding the performance difference for Trebuchet when enabling or disabling full screen mode. I found that as reported before, the scrolling speed for the homescreen is improved when enabling full screen mode. This is visible if you use a home screen scrolling animation (for example tablet animation), you can see some very little stuttering when scrolling with full screen mode disabled.

So, how can we help you with this? Or this is a CM10.1 known issue for trebuchet?
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] fariz_kd:
go back to ics

How i get back to ics??
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] mrd7rs:
Re: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

use odin to flash stock ics rom.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] prince93:
Re: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

I also have some stuttering (or low fps ) for the game subway surfers compared to official ICS, I have interactive governer and scheduler set to icq. I tried to change the minimum and maximum CPU frequency to 912MHz and 1GHz respectively. The fps didn't change. So, I think the cm kernel has something to do with this compared to the stock ICS kernel.

If you need any more investigation of the issue, I will be willing to help.

Also, for 3G, what modem do I need to flash? As I had a working 3G connection with official ICS just before flashing cm10.1, now I reflashed the modem from the official ICS, but I get no 3G data. Only the signal status changes from H+ to 3G, so it seems the device is registered correctly on the network, but whenever I try to use any app that uses internet data, it always fails. Play store, browser, YouTube, all say connection timeout.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] chienline:
Never try that one yet, sorry :(

Now I'm kind of busy with my project so I'm sticking with C-o-M's CM10.1.

It's good as daily use rom so I check only this thread in my spare time :)

---------- Post added at 11:32 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:03 AM ----------

I'm using modem I9103XXLQ3 and never have any problem with 3G connection.

I set CPU : interactive; min 216; max 1400; also no problem. But I never compare the fps using any apps, and I don't play games on this tab :D

Sometimes it freezes for few seconds before I can move the slider to unlock.

And sometimes the backlight still on when I lock the device to sleep mode, which drained my battery and turn my tab into a heater :eek: :D
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] C-o-M:
Have you checked your APN settings?
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] chienline:
He can see the H+ and 3G icons, I guess it might not be APN problem, but worth to try :)

Simply try this:

Settings >> Mobile networks >> Access Point Names

on top right corner [three dots] >> Reset to default.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] C-o-M:
It might be that the default is wrong. Happened to me once and the APN list (which I inherited from kalltkaffe) is pretty old.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] prince93:
Re: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

It might be the APN, I checked it before and noticed some differences than the one I used in the official ICS. I will it check for that thoroughly and report back.

Also, do you have any comment about the lower fps for example in subway surfers? I didn't measure it but it is clear to me without measurements. Abit of chopping due to lower fps than the one I got using official ICS.

Also, I often see like a screen glitch , like a very fast one but I still can capture it, is that normal?

EDIT

Now the 3G is working fine. I deleted the proxy in the APN settings.

EDIT 2:

For the low fps in subway surfers for example, I found out that this was due to enabling the developer feature " disable hardware overlays" which I thought would increase the performance, ad it was written below "always use gpu for screen compositing ".
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] zooster:
Maybe it has already been discussed but... Does this rom uses ION or pmem?
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] lallolu:
Which kernel does this ROM use by default? I cannot undervolt the ROM.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] safariking:
normal cm kernel
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] moosebreath:
Re: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

My screen keeps flashing from time to time. Is this a common problem? I looks like it is a loose contact, but shaking the tab does not reproduce it.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] Idlekilla:
I believe it's a common problem. I saw this behaviour also on CM10 and AOSP 4.1.2.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] C-o-M:
AW: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

This issue will probably never be fixed (unless we get the Nvidia hwcomposer source code or Nvidia provides a JB compatible binary)
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] martin707:
Re: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

And i was about to post the same error.... im experiencing it more often now.

E/gralloc ( 119): NvGrPost: Failed, TEGRA_DC_EXT_FLIP 6 No such device or address
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] safariking:
How is this rom compared to ICS stock 4.0.4?

- Battery life (it is worse on 4.0.4 stock)

- wifi (Sometimes it goes away on 4.0.4 stock)

- smoothnes and playing games watching video's youtube etc...?

Thanks!
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] nqk:
Re: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

I'm having problems with changing. It seems to stuck at 9%. The charger looks fine as it charges my S3 well.

I don't have an extra cable now, so I want to wipe battery stat, which I can't find the command in Recovery.

Where is it?

Edit: I bought a new cable and now it's charging fine.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] C-o-M:
AW: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

Thanks for the donations. I just bought an HDMI adapter. Trying to fix the rotation issue now.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] safariking:
one little question i have ICS 4.0.4 stock rom from februari 2013 do i still need to update the bootloader?
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] Der Straßenapotheker:
if you have screen problems, so update, but i think with 4.0.4 it's fine. the problem especially occurs mainly by waking up or sleep the tab.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] shiko80:
Coming from AOSP 4.1.2 I would say:

ICS + A1 1.8.3c:

- Smoothness in Firefox ok, especially with A1 kernel

- Battery life ok, but not as good as HC

- Very stable

AOSP 4.1.2:

- Smoothness in Firefox great, better than ICS

- I had several issues: Battery draining, charging issues, restarts

- Seems to be not very stable

CM10.1:

- Smoothness in Firefox poor, worse than ICS

- Smoothness in stock browser by far the best what I have seen on this tab

- Seems to be pretty stable

- Design/Layout maybe not the best for tablets: home button in the middle/upper status bar

- Battery life standby ok, in use worse then ICS

So it's hard to say what the best firmware is.

What do the other think? Did anyone try A1 kernel with CM10.1?
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] prince93:
Re: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

Does anyone have the same choppiness when navigating through the home screens? Using trebuchet launcher? Or is this a known issue.

I tried to use apex, the navigation throughout the home screens is very smooth when no wallpaper is set. Tried the same thing with trebuchet but the navigation was still sluggish. So any current solution for this?
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] C-o-M:
AW: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

Enable quick rendering in the launcher settings.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] prince93:
Re: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

It's enabled, but the performance is not as good as for example using apex on official ICS.

Also, I found out that the wallpaper can have its center changed after rebooting the tab, I mean after setting a wallpaper, you get the wallpaper misplaced ( its center is not as it should, so most of the wallpaper is not visible), you can try this on the default CM wallpaper. After I rebooted, I found out that the Wallpaper's center is adjusted a bit more than before so that a larger portion of the CM guy is visible.

Do you have any comment regarding this issue and the launcher navigation smoothness? The smoothness is different when using standard animation and tablet animation especially when you have a widget placed on one of the home screens.

I think this happens due to the fact that the launcher doesn't pop up the CPU frequency when a swiping event is registered, on the contrary to apex for example on stock ICS. I used to monitor the CPU frequency after swiping on the home screens using apex on official ICS and compared this to trebuchet on CM10.1. I used no frills could control to read the CPU freq. Stats for the last 5 seconds just after swiping. The result was that on apex ICS, the CPU freq % time is about 50% between 1GHz and 216MHz. On CM 10.1, the % was always about 30% @ 312MHz , 30% @ 456MHz and a very small % @1GHz.

All of the tests were using CPU governer: interactive, I/O scheduler: cfq.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] safariking:
So CM10.1 is better than stock ICS?

and if i dont like it i can flash back with odin without any problems or do i still need to do the ADB commands when flashing back with odin?
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] C-o-M:
AW: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

How often will you repeat this question?

To give the answer for the very last time: do a full wipe after flashing including reformatting the internal sdcard and you are fine. The adb commands are just for lazy people who don't want to copy their sdcard content back to the tab.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] varsas:
Regarding CM is there a reason why going landscape has the toolbar at the bottom rather than the side? On a Nexus 7 the tool bar is at the bottom in portrait but on the right in landscape.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] sgauge:
Which Kernel did you try ? From my experience, IceBolt is a no-go, but A1 kernel is great regarding the issues you had. No unstability either, although my tab is overclock @ 1.4Ghz. Haven't tried CM10.1 yet, but AOSP+A1 is so good that I don't feel like changing for the moment...
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] shiko80:
Yes I tried A1, but I had especially the draining issue what was caused by the GSM modem of my p7300 and the battery indicator did not work during charging. I also had to restart the tablet a couple times, because apps stopped working. Regarding smoothness Android 4.1.2 is known to be the best, even supposed to be better then Android 4.2.2; I have made the same experience with AOSP 4.1.2 and CM10.1. Right now I think about to stay at CM10.1 as the stock browser is damn fast, but to be honest I haven't tried the stock browser in AOSP4.1.2. What browser do you use? Are you actually using AOSP4.1.2 beta13 or beta14?

Hard to say, both have advantages especially the multi-user feature of CM10.1. I think the best would be a stock JB 4.1.2, but this will never appear for our tabs. So I still hope that you find some time to adapt the Motorola XOOM stock 4.1.2 firmware to our tab. Regarding stability and smoothness this should be the best as both hardware is pretty similar.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] martin707:
what's the command line to activate the xpad.ko for this rom?
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] safariking:
Now on CM10.1 Nice ui and very fast good job
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] Stamgastje:
That depends on the screen size. See also this page:

But I must admit that I would also like it to sit at the right side of the screen on our 8.9 tablet (and actually any size of tablet), since you typically need more vertical space than horizontal space to read web pages and mail.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] C-o-M:
AW: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

This is just the launcher dock. You won't see it while surfing and reading your mails.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] shiko80:
I have the same issue. Would it be possible to extract it from the Motorola JB stock firmware, I don't believe that it has the same issue. What do you think? Safariking, you already have the sources, can this be done?
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] safariking:
I have no idea sorry
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] C-o-M:
AW: [ROM][4.2.2][P7300/P7310][UNOFFICIAL] CyanogenMod 10.1 [M2, 2013-Mar-06]

I thought about that, but I never had the time to try. Maybe tomorrow.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] linw:
But why don't all have this problem? I can't say I have seen it here.
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] shiko80:
Yes, this would really be great. The flickering is the only thing right now what is kind of annoying, everything else is really excellent. Thanks C-o-M for the great job and spending your time for us!

Anyway I have a few questions to CM10.1:

- Did actually anybody try the A1 kernel, does this work. The stock CM10.1 kernel is already pretty good, but I would like to have the GPU overclocked to 400Mhz and maybe also the CPU to 1200/1400MHz

- I have kind of an double vibration when I click the homescreen / back button. Isn't there something like "sound - vibration intensity" in CM10.1?
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] prince93:
Why can't we get by the same way, the required drivers to enable the hardware dependent part of Project Butter? according to what I have read, Project butter requires some control of the GPU for VSync and so on. And since we have official JB stock for Motorola, and it uses the same chipset, so why not get the required drivers and apply them to CM10.1 for the 8.9 to activate the full potential of project butter?
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] :
well this has been a looooooong discussion in the O2x forum too.

Porting the nvidia libs of the atrix to the o2x to enable hardware acceleration or something like this. (noob here)

Most Devs said that it is not possible because there is still too much difference between those devices and that the nvidia code is kinda merged/mixed with the code by (in the o2x case) LG.

Would still be nice if its possible for the gt8.9 :)

cheers
[Galaxy Tab 8.9 Android Development] Brendo:
I've not had any issues with flickering, but stuff starts to lag after running for a few days (requires restart). A format would probably fix, but too much effort

Anyone else have issues with exchange email accounts not updating? Mine is on push and emails arrive, but only as unread (even though marked as read on other devices). Will try deleting the account and setting up again at some stage...