yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] alexisguitarra:
I had to switch to KPM because KPO has some problems switching between 2g/3g take a look of that. Just an advice. ;)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] jaggyjags:
I think I might discontinue this kernel development, castagnaIT is doing a great work with it, (you just have to look at his Github) and I think it is unfair if I just copy his work even If I give him the credits..

It won't be long for him to release his first 3.0 kernel.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] PatrickMac:
Just tried it, no problems for me so far with switching
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] XeLLaR*:
Noooo please dont, i only use your kernel and i love the minimalistic ness of it.:good: Castagna has way too much "Features" in it. My device gets slow from it.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] anuseb89:
Just because he is building his kernel doesn't mean you have to stop work..he is working really good on 2.6 kernel..but we need someone in kernel 3 also along with diablob..so pls dont discontinue...you can stop once a stable v3 is ready if you want..till then we cant afford to lose you... :(
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] CastagnaIT:
I thank you jaggyjags!

you have realized that i did not like too much,

I'm losing a lot of hours to do this, and see my project copied from other people really very disappoints me.

In any case, i wanted to delete my Github, in order to work safely with a private resposity, without being controlled from many people that me also continuously bombarded with PM.

I also want to announce that will release a first version in about a week
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] XeLLaR*:
Im not sure, but i think you can disable PM's in settings :)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] coverworld:
please don´t stop your work, i used both kernel and i have realy no problems with your kernel, but very much problem with the jb kernel from castagnaIT.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] nguyenchienbig:
+1

sent from 9001 CM10 ivendor
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] XeLLaR*:
+1
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] jaggyjags:
I will just keep the kernel updated with arco68's and ivendor sources at least until castagnaIT releases his.

You won't have problems with castagnaIT's 3.0jb as we had with 2.6jb. Don't worry.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] CastagnaIT:
HEHE I know, but i need pm, to communicate with other people

my kernel is version 2.6, i already know that is not perfect

I did my best, but now i just focus on 3.0, you will not have to wait long, then give your opinion
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] XeLLaR*:
Yeah. People who are in your friendlist still can send you pm then, but people who arent cant :)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Daniel.96:
You and jaggyjags gave me to think about it and I also think it is not ok (especially if you don't like it) ... My kernel is mostly like a collection of things made by others, thats why I gave this much credits... I mean CastagaIT did an awesome job and it is also awesome that he shares his work on Github. But even if I give him and all the others whoose changes i used credits, i feel not ok. 'My' Kernel is a lot based on CastagnaIT's, but CastagnaIT's is much more detailed and he has much more knowledge then me. I also see more and more not really a sense behind my kernel because CastagnaIT's Kernel offers the same and much more features, so it is useless to make one with less features. I will think about it, but I think it will be the fairest and best solution to stop at this point, and 'restart' with my Thread at point 0 in the next days. (I think I will do so.)

I will start again in a few days, but then only on the bases of Arco or Ivendor and will do every modifikation 100% by myself, without other user's Github as base. Maybe I was a bit too euphoric about making an own Kernel..

Greets Diablo
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Xistance:
I don't get why you guys see taking other peoples code as a bad thing. If it is 100% the same then sure, it might not be a good thing but as long as you learn why and what the code does you can use it as a base of making your own modifications. Open source is open for a reason. So everyone can share what they wrote and make some great stuff even if what is written isn't yours.

Btw, I'm not saying not to stop. That is your decision to make.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Daniel.96:
Sure, but if CastagnaIT don't want/like to use his source as a base, it is another thing (at least for me).. I also really like the idea of open source, but if it is a kind of 'forced' (if the owner don't wants other users to use his Source) it not anymore as 'open' as it is supposed to be.

@Jaggyjags if you would like to work with me together and start from 0, just use Arcos/Ivendors Git as base and make every modifikation by ourselfes, and make it 100% opensource, for everyone- just pm me ;)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] anuseb89:
Dats the spirit guys...u two can start new thread and can release better versions.. now i think we cant say open source atleast in this s plus development..i hope these things wont slow down v3 kernel and 4.2...

all the best and good luck...
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] TAVYX:
Your kernel IS AWESOME. It's fast and with 370 mb of RAM free to use and 720p video recording . But after tacking a picture the app won't let u tacke another. Please can u make a fix for this before stop developing this kernel......???

sorry for bad english.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] ZordanKV:
Just use SilentCamera, as he said. ;)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] hotheabilly:
I think all kernel that posted/published/released is under GPL license? :/

-sent from my awesome phone-
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Daniel.96:
Your 100% right. So that actually means that everyone can use work, published under this licens, if you give credits. (At least it should be so )
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] EB20XY:
Here is the extraction of GPL usage within XDA, esp. for kernels:

"By posting your work on XDA-Developers, you are agreeing that it complies with relevant licensing conditions. As such, by posting a kernel or other work containing GPL code, you are confirming to us that you have made this source code available publicly under the GPL, and should highlight this in your thread with a link. (Plenty of respected and trusted sites will host the code for you free of charge, such as GitHub and BitBucket.) By posting open sourced work on XDA, you are also ensuring that your available sources are up-to-date with the work you have released. This means that if you update your kernel to add a new feature, for example, your sources should be updated to include this change. "

Source: xda and GPL for kernel development
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] hotheabilly:
yeah its his decision, but it would great if you work with jags and hadidjapri from our device (i8150) don't lose the spirit mate! ;) :D
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] jaggyjags:
thankyou, I hope castagnaIT releases his source when he publish his kernel, he has been a big reference for new developers as me and want to keep learning from him. I understand he doesn't want others to release his work before he does so, its not very nice and I stated that before he removed his source.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] smeroni68:
Hi to all and EB20XY.

I would like to say something. It's not only a matter of GPL and credits. I had with Diablo some PM exchange regarding some feature developed by Castagna... I directed him to Castagna and Castagna has appreciated his request and has helped him to finalize the implementation (Diablo can confirm, I think).

I just wrote some post on italian site regarding this situation. I noted that, for example, the scheduler ROW (now in test from me and castagna) is already pubblished on Jaggy v0.7... the real un useful stuff is that we are not sure that this scheduler is working and do not create problems (we are in testing right now) and Jaggy has already integrated (as it is) in a new kernel revision.

In general I agree on GPL, but normally I personally prefer that a pubblished new feature must be released after testing... may be some of you will not agree with my thinking, but this is my idea.

Is obvious that GPL will permit to use and integrate and modify source code developed from other dev, but every action I think must be performed with the right times.

Now just a word to EB20XY: in dev phase is appreciated some help from users and dev to perform a good job... but sometime too much PM are causing some unexpected reactions... Always in general, after a build releasing there are forum and thread like this to report experiences and evaluation on the released build, but until an official release has been pubblished it is un useful...
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] EB20XY:
I didn't made any statement here concerning the work of castagnaIT. (would be the wrong thread)

I only wanted to help "hotheabilly" (link) related to 1 post later passage "So that actually means that everyone can use work, published under this licens".

I liked to state for "hotheabilly" that I think it is possible to use all the code here in xda for (non-commercial) kernel development

without any risks or fear if the GPL and xda rules are met.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] anuseb89:
professionally speaking its allowed..but people also have feeling...some ppl lyk to share their work..some dont..hope casta will publish github once stable v3 is made...till that point better to stop discussing about this...bcz when these things happen dev is getting slow...sorry if I hurt anyone's feelings...i think i didnt do so.... :p
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] CastagnaIT:
Hi all,

this shall be my last and only answer, to the decision to have removed the source

and I hope to be understood.

As he says Xistance take code from other sources is not a bad thing, in fact I've always been of the idea of leaving all public, so as to helping each other.

Smeroni he anticipated in the answer, because I have just returned from work,

to EB20XY you did not understand the speech, is not about GPL but common sense,

and I regret to tell you but it is useless to interfere every time,

your posts and PM are incompetent, at least before writing or write me in PM, please inform well studying.

my decision to remove the source is not because I do not want to share my work,

but because it is too easy to publish a custom kernel copying the work of others,

passing it off as their own, even if jaggy has rightly written credits on me.

I invest much time to do things the right way and discover that other people copy my work

before an official release is really bad and dishonest,

but especially, it makes me think that there are not people who create modified kernel from scratch, with his own hand, as I did.

So concluding this speech, for all those who insist on request my sources,

will have to wait, because the trust can not buy, but you get with the time.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] jaggyjags:
removed latest 0.7 version as it included sourced from castagnaIT. will not use them if he does not give the permissions to do so..
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] nguyenchienbig:
so sad,,, because I am use jaggykerner0.7 and it very well
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] XeLLaR*:
If someone wants 0.7 pm me ;)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Aldokazer:
That's black marketing :P
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] t0kgrumps:
at least its not a warez :D
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] saifzahid:
lets come back to the ROM.,

works smooth., no lag no bug ( except cam,*solution is silent camera from the play store)

like kernel 3.0.57 ..the only thing bother me is RAM is approximately fully consumed without installing much applications.

want to say thanks All developers working hard to give our device a new life and feel us proud having old device with latest Android version and new kernels.

:thumbup: all devolepers
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] anuseb89:
This is wat is open source....not black market...
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Aldokazer:
Dude, the dev is not keen in providing the kernel. Its open-source until and unless the maker wants it to be open-source.

Back to the topic now. @OP, why don't u make v0.7 all by yourself? You are a gr8 dev..!
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] jaggyjags:
new version, check op.

2 versions with different toolchains and optimizations.

on my journey to find new updates to the kernel I found several developers who already used the changes by castagnaIT, so no point in removing them.

ICS version wil be uploaded in a few hours. Kernel should be stable. (as stable as a 3.0.57 kernel for our phone can be for now...)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] :
346 mb of ram....but it s stable!

Live Android and Prosper
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] XeLLaR*:
Yup arco made that changr in pmem. Its alot more stable than before.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] mertee:
installation aborted with 0.8 o3 on jb rom and after wiping caches. did i sth wrong? :/
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] signs23:
Tested 0.8 o3 on ICS (arcos beta3)

I got a lot of fc's when opening apps(Opera,Facebook,Tapatalk, Temple Run..), also i had no intern or extern memory available.

But a lot of apps, as long as they did not forced to close^^ did a better job
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Rhonin86:
Maybe this is the reason for your fcs :cyclops: or maybe i have overseen the new uploaded ICS version...

Cheers

Rhonin
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] signs23:
Startpost say

So i thought i can use it on ICS^^
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] jaggyjags:
My fault, didn't specify for what android version are they in OP.. :(
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] bananause:
Which one is for ICS?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] jaggyjags:
None. Give me 20 mins and I will upload them..

Only JB versions now.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] jaggyjags:
ICS versions uploaded, also changed JB versions names to avoid confusion.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Rhonin86:
Jeah - this happened to me with a former kernel - so you are not alone ;)

He no problem @ all because as mentioned above this happened to me once and therefore i had a closer look to the link and it said JB so i assumed that the kernels are only for JB. So don't bother

Keep up your good work

Cheers

Rhonin
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] XeLLaR*:
Good one, i wanted to Upload 0.8.3 yesterday but i see you are ahead :D
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] jaggyjags:
Yea, that was a test version. This is ahead. ;)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] nihS:
Fast charge dosnt work :/ on slimbean
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] jaggyjags:
Please specify what problems you have. Remember to unlug usb charger, enable fast charge and connect usb again to pc.

I use slimbean and it works just fine..
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] Rhonin86:
First impression Jaggy 0.8 O3

Hi Jaggy,

i installed your kernel a few moments ago - and it works good despite the known problems.

a) cam starts but if a picture is taken the cam freezes and the picture isn't stored anywhere

b) if the phone is connected to the pc it isn't recognized (must be switched to mtp ? but i don't know how to do it :o i can't find the referring menupoint in CM9 :confused: )

GPS works pretty good, overall system performance is good - maybe better with more free mem, switch 2G/3G with no prob, Wlan runs fast, the earlier problem, that my SD-Card wasn't recognized is also gone. Battery Drain seems to be low :good:

So i think you are on the right way :laugh: and i hope my feedback could help you to get further ....

Cheers

Rhonin

Concerning the battery drain i will update this post later :D
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] XeLLaR*:
Cambug is relatwd to camerahal, its simply not ready for kernel 3.0.57.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] nihS:
I use a normal adapter to load my phone and since i use ur kernel loading my phine takes very long :/ even if i hit the fastcharge button in notification panel
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] XeLLaR*:
One Word: Awesome :D

Look whats under my device. I know benchmarks doesnt tell how smooth a device is, but this is hilarious.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] jimsiv:
What version did you use ? With O3 or not?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] nihS:
Okay now i've found out it wasnt ur kernel it was my charge adapter wich dosnt work corectly bow i use another one and it loads fast.. -.- sorry
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] XeLLaR*:
Without.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] cezaralboiu:
what is o3 optimization?how does it improve this kernel? is it faster? more stable?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] jimsiv:
Just in testing the version with O3 with JB ErikMOD RC2-Final....until now wi-fi works and also the camera...tested with stock camera and can record with both 480 and 720!!! Woaoo!!

Only some green glitches when I stop recording but not important.

BT works but I can't transfer files through that. USB mass storage doen't work and also I can't see my files in both internal and external SD.

Antutu gave me 5.395 but without testing my card because it couldn't be found!! I'll try the simple version without O3

Good try Jaggy....keep going!!!:good::good::good:

Edit: Tested the simple version without O3.....just the same bugs from above!!
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] SHiFT!:
but on special ramdisk version usb is working
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] signs23:
Till now, didnt noticed a big difference on ics. Only thing is that gaming performance is better.

Is 480x800 maximal resolution for cam now?

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9001
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] XeLLaR*:
Yes, i think ivendor is working on Alpha8 CM10 and he will fix Camera.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] cezaralboiu:
i don't see any change on his github:(
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] XeLLaR*:
He doesnt push every single edit, he is working behind the scenes :)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] cezaralboiu:
i think so. it would be great to have a fully working camera on our phone. do you know if alpha 8 will be based on 3.0 kenel?:D
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] XeLLaR*:
I dont know, i just made some expectations :)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] failly:
Maybe its handt to explain what o3 is in the first post.

What is it?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] kouros17:
Jaggyjags, could you build a bigmem 3.0 kernel (400mb) like the Diaplo's one, for better perfomance in games (a bit laggy for me)?
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] XeLLaR*:
Change i/o sheduler to row.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] jaggyjags:
for next version, but I need to know which toolchain to use, please test both versions and tell me which is better (linaro or standard toolchain).

dont want to be working always with lots of different versions, too much work.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] jbezerra:
we hope that your expectations will be correct! ;)
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] kouros17:
It's difficult to say. Both are equally good (i don't see any difference) with a few lags in heavy games.

Seems to me that 4.7 toolchain is a little better.
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] XeLLaR*:
Standart toolchain is more stable in my opinion.

I played a little bit around and accidently changed some values for Low memory killer, can someone provide me the Stock values from cm10 alpha6?

(Yes i was stupid enough to not take a screenshot before chamging it :( )
[Galaxy S Plus I9001 Android Development] jaggyjags:
just disable boot settings from system tuner and reboot the phone.

values are restored on every boot if no app changes them after.
[LG Optimus 4X HD] Jygar:
Hi Guys,

Just got my 4X after deciding to replace my Galaxy S Advance (my Nexus S died this was its "like for like" replacement).

First thing I've noticed where as AMOLED Samsung phone are all about black menu's the LG is all about white menus, it's a refreshing change.

The display clarity is good, very natural, similar to my friends Xperia T, not over saturated like the One X.

Performance is nice, big improvement over my Advance as it's still on GB.

Fingers crossed for JB in January, I'm currently on 10F firmware, hopefully 10H will trickle through soon.

Matt
[LG Optimus 4X HD] RuedasLocas:
Welcome Matt.

:cool:
[LG Optimus 4X HD] Gildegan:
Enjoy the 4X, you won't regret it
[LG Optimus 4X HD] eagleeyetom:
Welcome.

Thread closed.
[Nokia Lumia 920] fahad233:
So I recently bought a used Lumia 920 locked to Rogers from criagslist up here in Toronto.

After spending a day with it I've noticed that this is a highly defective piece.

The rattle on the vibration motor is horrendous!

The dust under the front facing camera makes me wonder how the front facing camera takes any pictures. :/

Is there any recourse for me? Or am I up the creek without a paddle as they say?

:(
[Nokia Lumia 920] gnrthx:
I have the same situation too man. Bought mine in kijiji here in Montreal. Though, I am having overheating problems. I emailed Stephen Elop (chief executive) and surprisingly got a response and directed me to a support team. They will call me this Thursday to try and sort things out. Try your luck, there's nothing to loose!

Also, there's a member who bought a L920 (AT&T) off craigslist and had pleasant results.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2032888
[Nokia Lumia 920] fahad233:
Hmm, so according to the thread you posted. I should try calling up Rogers and getting warranty support from them?

Unfortunately I don't have an account with them so I think I'm not covered that way. But I'll try walking into a store anyways.

I'll try emailing Nokia as well...
[Nokia Lumia 920] gnrthx:
Yup, it's worth a shot!
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] nykiddd516:
So i heard tmobile gn2 will be getting software updates on the 19th. But I rooted my phone would I still get those updates?
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] seamonkey420:
nope. you'll need to unroot and get back to stock and then get the updates or flash an updated rom w/the frameworks/updates.

the toolkit should get you back to the stock rom but be sure to backup apps via titanium and call logs/sms messages via other apps. :)
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] casperi:
Or just wait as the devs update their roms. Which normally is day or less.

The devs we do have here are top notch.

Casperi
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] paydaman:
Can a SAM T879 be flashed to a SAM T889 rom

I noticed at best buy they have a Note II SAM T879 (Android 4.0 OS) for a good price but was wondering if it could be flashed to a newer rom.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] KillaHurtz:
You're on the wrong forum. However, that phone is identical to the i717 which has very new ROMS and will be officially getting multiwindow and other features of the Note 2.
[HTC One X+] adamkaye:
Hi all,

I have an AT&T HOX+ rooted running a stock ROM. All of a sudden the last few days my phone will connect to both my home networks (2.4 and 5GHz) but won't actually connect to the internet. This is incredibly odd. It was working fine until a few days ago.

Based on a search around the internet, I tried setting up a static IP address to no avail. Any ideas?
[HTC One X+] somemadcaaant:
Not enough info given... reset your router and phone, failing that reset settings back to stock or call your isp/router oem for support.
[HTC One X+] adamkaye:
I've tried all that. The issue is clearly not the router, since every other device, WiFi or Wired in my house is working fine. The issue is clearly with the phone.