yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] wingtytn:
i cant help u choose a rom for one reason now not sure if anyone told u this but each rom is cooked to how the cook wanted it to be so the best advise i can give u is to read each one and choose according to what ur lookin for
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] hdeglide:
If i may throw my 2 cents in: im currently running superchargedwiz rom kyjelly and i like the stability and feel. Compared to executioner 2.5 which is better on battery life. Supercharged has some of the tweaks that we all had before vzws ota that took some of those away. If i play with ktweakers kernal some, im quite sure i can get some extreme battery results.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] anl2304:
I really liked superchargedwiz too. I am not too comfortable with tinkering with kernels, though. I guess my next step in this learning process is installing custom kernels and tweaking them for optimal performance/battery life.

Besides that, any of scott's roms would get my vote.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] kimsj756:
Hey, mind explaining how you undervolt?
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] drbveb88:
They are also one of the first roms. They have alot more time in this thread therefore alot more downloads.

Most of the touchwiz roms are very stable. They all have there tweaks.

Cleanrom is very stable and heavily supported. Nice themwing is also available.

Galaxy mod is super stable, executioner 2.5. The sprint based ports (goodness and wicked) are super nice and much more customizable than any verizon roms.

They do have a Mms problem. There is a workaround and they are working on a fix.

Bottom line, just make a backup and

Flash away. Try them out and see what fits you the most. Thats part of the fun!

Sent by Tony Romo...it was INTERCEPTED by XDA !!!
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] romyg:
If you're looking at CleanRom vs ClesnRom Lite, Scott posted in the CleanRom thread that he recommends the lite version.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] Thank Me Later:
I am waiting on the Sprint ports to fix the MMS problem. I want to try those Roms out the most :)
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] ECrispy:
What's so different about the Sprint ports? Do they really have better reception?
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] Thank Me Later:
Sprint has the worst reception out of all 4 major carriers. I can say because I've been with all 4. The Samsung development seems to be awesome on Sprint. I use to have a GS2. Check out that section. They're development is insane. For a phone that has a really bad wireless radio, the E4GT has a good community behind it.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] ECrispy:
I meant reception on our phone with the Sprint port vs Vzw roms. There are posts in those threads that the phone has better reception with Sprint roms.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] aptisme:
SynergyRom works great for me, r155 has multiwindow view.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] thetendy:
Synergy just added multi-window, a first for TW based ROMs IIRC
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] pcdisme:
I don't remember seeing that. I think he uses the lite versions as a test platform for full releases.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] ganGeee:
so far i am loving this paranoidkangdroid rom http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2028248

only problem is you cant answer the phone with stock phone app due to some dpi issue. I just downloaded an app from app store to answer calls. other than that small bug I think this is the best rom out there that uses both aokp and cm settings. just need them to fix that one bug..
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] romyg:
Here's what I found:

Welp Scott, I am back bud! Recommend this or Lite?

Lite... Always lite...

Link: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=35677624&highlight=always+lite#post35677624
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] crjjr:
I've used all the Executioner ROMs as well as CleanRom. I'm partial to Executioner. Both are good ROMs, but Executioner is a bit smoother on my phone. You won't go wrong with either ROM though. Both Devs really know what they're doing. You'll just need to try them both and decide for yourself what works better on your phone. Even though we all have S3's, some ROMs work better on some S3's while others work better with different ROMs. Strange, but true.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] ricecake2000:
I'm running Darth stalker at the moment. Its wicked fast! There are fonts that are available and has ink lock. Seems to be good on battery too and multi window is in the works.

Also has both cameras and some other goodies
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] mchief298:
I'm using SynergyRom. It's nice, fast, efficient, and coupled with the KT747 kernel, battery life is the best I've gotten out of custom roms. I've tried executioner, CleanROM, CM10/10.1... The list goes on.. but I've settled with my current setup, and couldn't be happier.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] Skubacb:
Using Synergy. Seems that R169 is pretty smooth. On the first boot the phone will get warm on the bottom but this stops after about 15-20 minutes. Something is resetting itself. They say to turn off USB debugging for a while and then turn it back on. Didn't seem to make a difference for me. So I made sure the phone was fully charged and left the charger plugged in.

This is my first ROM. So far I have found that everything is working smoothly. The battery seems to go down at near the same rate as stock. Some people say it is much better but I guess that depends on what you have in the phone.

Big deal for me was to buy Titanium backup and make a full backup with it. Do not select to backup system apps. Then you can have it make a zip of your backup. Then burn the recovery rom and do a full backup while in the recovery. After you burn the rom you can have CWM burn the zip. This makes it much easier to get everything back.

Good luck.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] HaVoK C89:
I'd definitely like to throw in my ballot for The Executioner and CleanROM!
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] m-cat:
Hells ROM

Have you looked into hells rom? Of all the roms i've flashed, I always kept going back to that one. It had great battery life, 4.2 apps, super smooth, and super light weight. Here is the link: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2025739
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] Toddricks:
Gps works perfect for me. Running cleanrom 5.6
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] oldschool25:
Beans Rom b9
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] mojitomcqueen:
EDGE HD. Hands down. The best.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] FeelLikeThis:
I'm enjoying CSROM with ktoonez kernel. Having decent battery life and decent enough benchmark scores to make me happy. The ROM is buttery smooth for me.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] Dearborn1977:
Jelly "Beans" B9

Been using Beans' roms since about b5 on ICS. They are super stable and feature-filled. Support has been good. They are perfect "daily drivers" - not the flashiest but everything works. Back before the JB update was official, some of the JB ROMs were terrible, but I'm guessing that most of them are pretty stable at this point.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] tmkerwin:
My vote has to go to Synergy... and there's a huge new release coming out tonight
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] fbcalidude:
I had been running CleanROM, and just switched to beans 9, It's really smooth and I like the theme, I will be staying with beans for now
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] Thank Me Later:
I'm currently leaning thinking of trying Jelly Beans or EdgeHD I'm waiting for Edge's Rom to be themed before I try that. I almost did flash CleanRom but I was reading some issues about GPS not locking or not staying on location?
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] FeelLikeThis:
I had that problem when I flashed cleanrom lite, as well as had a freezing problem no matter what kernel I tried. Never had an issue with it before. All of the ROMs on here have been pretty awesome, so you can't really go wrong whichever one you choose to go with. For me CSROM with kt747 has been the smoothest and stabelest ROM I've run. I've tried them all and am constantly flashing different ROMs daily. I'm waiting for beans v10 to drop as I'm sure it will be awesome as well. :thumbup:

---------- Post added at 08:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:10 PM ----------

Just make sure you backup your imei and follow the instructions posted by the dev of your choice and you should be happy. :):beer:
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] falconey07:
I bought both of these games during the google .99 sale a few months back and they apparently were not supported for the LTE. I tried them both after updating to JB and now they both work. I'm on Stock with Goodies Rom, but I can't imagine the Rom has anything to do with the games working. There may even be more games that work now. Hope this helps someone esle out there.
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] BPFerrari1:
sweet!

Unfortunately GTA: Vice City doesn't work and doesn't even show up on Play since it's apparently not compatible. Go to Play on the computer and shows that my old Photon 4G, Galaxy S2, and Acer Iconia Tab are compatible...:confused:
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] mrshades812:
Well... if you go to the HTC website, it shows our phone as still running ICS. So sad.
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] MassStash:
Sprints says JB

~Viper4G 2.0.2 S-Off LTEvo;My kernelz face is burning...

cpu0/1: 1.7ghz ¦ 192mhz ¦ sleep: 486mhz max

Ondemand

deadline

mpdecision: off
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] EVOMIKE025:
It will until the first couple days of January after the ota roll out is complete I believe

Sent from my Jelly Bean'd EVO LTE
[Sprint HTC EVO 4G LTE] clavin78:
Yeah dead space and ME Infiltrator don't freeze anymore
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] TheDynamiteGuy:
Hey everyone,

i just want to know about voltage/uv tables that you all using and also script/app you're use...

:confused:

Sent from my TURBO'ED Xperia Ray
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] bleepyboop:
These are mine:

#!/system/bin/sh
echo 134400 750 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 184320 775 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 192000 775 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 249600 800 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 364800 825 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 460800 850 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 576000 875 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 652800 900 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 768000 925 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 806400 1000 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 921600 1025 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 1017600 1050 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 1113600 1075 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 1209600 1100 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 1305600 1125 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 1401600 1150 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 1516800 1175 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
echo 1612800 1225 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/vdd_levels
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] TheDynamiteGuy:
what kernel and rom your using??..and it is stabe??

Sent from my TURBO'ED Xperia Ray
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] bleepyboop:
Flykernel 0.8fix and FXP151. Stable up to 1.4ghz, get random reboots for 1.5/1.6 no matter what voltage I set it at
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] TheDynamiteGuy:
can you attach your script??

Sent from my TURBO'ED Xperia Ray
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] AvRS:
Thread moved. Unless you developed something, please don't post threads in development. All questions belong here in Q&A.

Thanks

AvRS
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] justmpm:
Be a little bit careful with an undervolting script because every phone is a little bit different . For example, mine will reboot like mad if my low end voltage goes below 800 mV. So don't set it up to run at boot (for example as an init.d script) until you are sure it will work on your phone. There are a lot of apps that will let you undervolt (provided the kernel is set up for it) and it may be easier to use an app to find your settings and then load them as a script. Also, there are many detailed guides on how to do undervolt with out making your phone unstable. The battery power saved by undervolting is probably much less than you think and it is probably more important that your phone enters deep sleep with out a lot of wake locks.

I undervolt to help the cpu run cooler, which can be important if you are going to over clock and I use incredicontrol from the market, but there are many apps that will help you do this.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] bleepyboop:
Here, flash in recovery.

I think someone said before that it so happens that only certain frequencies dislike being undervolted, I don't remember why. I think it's 768mhz for the Ray. I actually find that although it's important that your phone enters deep sleep, undervolting does make a noticeable difference since your phone will inevitably spend some time awake, even if you keep the screen off most of the time. Say you undervolt by 1/3, that means for every 3% battery you lose while the phone is awake, you would only lose 2% when it's undervolted, so it can add up to a nice saving in battery.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] justmpm:
Yes, one of the middle voltages is typically preferred by the phone and it typically is set at a higher Voltage than what you would predict from the rest of the cpufreq table. And yes, the transition between the lowest clock speed and deep sleep is really important and is often overlooked and it is this transition that usually causes my phone to reboot when I too severely under volt that last cpufreq because it usually reboots after the screen goes off or when I try and turn it back on. And it is true that undervolting will give some battery savings, but the difference is not that dramatic. I think mostly because when your phone is awake there are a lot of power hungry things eating the power in addition to the cpu, the screen for example.

Bedalus did a whole bunch of really nice battery drain benchmarks and there were a lot of things that sort of went against the common wisdom including this business about undervolting...at first I didn't believe it but I benched it myself. Here is one of his threads that discusses the undervolting and I think links to the other benchmarks are in the OP: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1478406

But I think undervolting is really important if you are going to OC because the heat production increases with the square of the Voltage (V*V) and linearly with the cpufreq so you can spare your cpu some heat damage by undervolting.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] bleepyboop:
Hmm, that spreadsheet seems to confirm what I stated above. I highlighted the important part: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AqM2m2gWwQBgdGhsY19kVTBmdFlSdkQ1QnM4WTZJNlE

Analysis of results: for clock speeds of 800mhz and above, a 25% decrease in voltage resulted in roughly a 33% decrease in power draw

For clock speeds of 200-400, a 37% decrease in voltage resulted in roughly a 31% decrease in power draw

For the clock speed of 100, a 47% decrease in voltage resulted in roughly a 32% decrease in power draw.

This is around a 1:0.7 to 1:1.2 ratio. This is brilliant! This means that for every 10% we undervolt, we see roughly 7-12% less battery draw!

Edit: originally compared as a percentage of 1.5v, new preliminary analysis below

Analysis of results: for 1000mhz, a 4% undervolt gives 4.5-6.7% less battery draw

for 800mhz, a 6% undervolt gives 4.5-8% less battery draw

for 400mhz, a 10% undervolt gives 0-4.5% less battery draw

for 200mhz, a 11% undervolt gives 0% less battery draw

for 100mhz, a 16% undervolt gives 8.8-12.9% less battery draw

These results seem quite inconsistent, when we do see a power saving, it from any where to 0.45% to 1.68% less battery draw for every 1% we undervolt, which fits in with what you're saying about the difference not being that significant near the low end.

However, the results are quite dramatic when we stress test. At the worst, a 6% undervolt results in 8% less battery draw. At the best, a 9.5% undervolt results in 32% less battery draw. Holy ****!

I noticed that certain voltage changes appear to not cause any change in power draw in both the stress tests and the normal test, not sure why this is. However, when we do get savings, the savings seem to be quite decent. I'll try to do a more in depth analysis later.

Of course, all of this depends on your usage i.e. how often you keep your screen on, what apps wake lock your device etc. But my phone likes to stay awake quite a bit with the screen off, and thus would probably see quite a bit of power saving there. It would be nice to see benchmarks for normal usage with deep idle on to confirm this. My subjective opinion is that I've noticed a significant difference when I undervolt, but it must also depend on your device/CPU/kernel/governor.

Yeah I remember someone saying this, but I never got round to testing it thoroughly. I mainly based my voltages as a result of others' work.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] justmpm:
Yes, everything you say is true and undervolting will make the cpu use less power and the savings at the cpu level are dramatic. I totally agree! These benchmarks were done with the screen off (or really dim) where the current draw of the screen is not greater than 9mA. The max draw for the Nexus S screen is 690mA and when bedalus assumes a median screen draw of 320 mA then even a 13% savings in from the cpu turns into 2% total savings when the screen is on: http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=22126846&postcount=4. As you said the more activity you have with the screen off, for example listening to music, the greater your savings will be.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] bleepyboop:
Yeah that's true, but Bedalus' point becomes a bit moot when you compare that 9mA vs the current draw at full load at 1ghz which is around 80mA. 2% at worst case scenario is still around 3 hours on deep idle, which isn't too shabby anyway.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] TheDynamiteGuy:
why your zip dont have init.d directory??after install it go to system/etc..

but that voltage table is stable with my device till 1.2 ghz..i didnt try above than that..
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] bleepyboop:
Oh whoops, sorry! I slapped it together in a hurry since I had to rush out, glad it works okay.

I've fixed the zip file should anyone else want to download it. Whew, that's embarrassing.
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] Andrev01:
And how to reset this to original values? :) Is it better to use such a script or an app to do this (for ex. Voltage Control Extreme)?
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] TheDynamiteGuy:
delete the script and reboot,it will reset the voltage...

use app to test stability...after that you can use script..

app will cost some memory and ram..script is only about 2-3kb...
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] Andrev01:
Odp: Undervolt

I installed voltage control app, and I dont see UV options. Why? My kernel doesnt have this feature? So how can I flssh the script, I guess it wont work.

Tapnięte z Ray`a // Sent by Tapatalk 2
[Sony Ericsson Xperia Mini, Mini Pro, Xperia Pro, A] TheDynamiteGuy:
refer to your kernel if it support vdd level control or undervolt..
[Galaxy Y GT-S5360 and Duos 6102 Q&A, Help & Troubl] TingTingin:
Does anyone know a launcher that allows you to change icons in the app drawer to custom ones individually and allows you to remove the dock from the homescreen I tried launcher pro but you can remove the dock a lot of launchers can't and its not advertised so the only way of me finding out would be trying a bunch of launchers and hoping I find 1 so does anyone know 1

_____________________________________

This post uses the patented TingTingin®™ method I would teach it to you but you are not yet worthy (come back in a hundred years)
[Galaxy Y GT-S5360 and Duos 6102 Q&A, Help & Troubl] BLACKSTAR:
I am not sure but its xperia home launcher!

U can give it a try
[Galaxy Y GT-S5360 and Duos 6102 Q&A, Help & Troubl] D_Rising_Pheonix:
I think So In Adw Launcher U Can Do that.

Just Press Thanks Nothing Else...

He he If I helped You

Custom Rom -USSR8

White kernel 1.3.3

Undervolt -140mv

Andrealine Engine

My SGY IS the BESt
[Galaxy Y GT-S5360 and Duos 6102 Q&A, Help & Troubl] TingTingin:
ill try that

ADW only allows changing of an entire icon selection based on packs not individual based on what the user chooses
[Galaxy Y GT-S5360 and Duos 6102 Q&A, Help & Troubl] kundancool:
GO Launcher EX

Try :)
[Galaxy Y GT-S5360 and Duos 6102 Q&A, Help & Troubl] D_Rising_Pheonix:
Hey

Check This

In Holo Launncher also You can do

That.

Custom Rom -USSR8

White kernel 1.3.3

Undervolt -140mv

Andrealine Engine

My SGY IS the BESt
[Galaxy Y GT-S5360 and Duos 6102 Q&A, Help & Troubl] keviv77:
Try apex launcher.its very fast n low on space plus everything u wanted

Sent from my Blade
[Galaxy Y GT-S5360 and Duos 6102 Q&A, Help & Troubl] -CALIBAN666-:
Or last adw

GREETZ WITH TAP A TALKED BEATZ!!!
[Galaxy Y GT-S5360 and Duos 6102 Q&A, Help & Troubl] TingTingin:
Doesnt allow changing of individual icons

last adw? If you mean the recently released 1 ADW was the first app I tried same problem as go launcher

Apex is ics and up

Wait how holo launcher is what i use...can u change icons of apps in the app drawer?

_____________________________________

This post uses the patented TingTingin®™ method I would teach it to you but you are not yet worthy (come back in a hundred years)
[Galaxy Y GT-S5360 and Duos 6102 Q&A, Help & Troubl] -CALIBAN666-:
Adw is new updated in store.awesome

GREETZ WITH TAP A TALKED BEATZ!!!
[Galaxy Y GT-S5360 and Duos 6102 Q&A, Help & Troubl] TingTingin:
Ill try again and post if it works :thumbup::)

_____________________________________

This post uses the patented TingTingin®™ method I would teach it to you but you are not yet worthy (come back in a hundred years)
[Galaxy Y GT-S5360 and Duos 6102 Q&A, Help & Troubl] TingTingin:
I checked it was last updated on the 23 of Nov and I tried it a couple days ago and you can't change idvidual icons or am i doing something wrong?

_____________________________________

This post uses the patented TingTingin®™ method I would teach it to you but you are not yet worthy (come back in a hundred years)
[Galaxy Y GT-S5360 and Duos 6102 Q&A, Help & Troubl] -CALIBAN666-:
Many sorry imean the ex version.i use it without dock

GREETZ WITH TAP A TALKED BEATZ!!!
[Galaxy Y GT-S5360 and Duos 6102 Q&A, Help & Troubl] TingTingin:
Can you change individual icons in the EX version

_____________________________________

This post uses the patented TingTingin®™ method I would teach it to you but you are not yet worthy (come back in a hundred years)
[Galaxy Y GT-S5360 and Duos 6102 Q&A, Help & Troubl] -CALIBAN666-:
Ive not test it.but it must work because its choosable.

GREETZ WITH TAP A TALKED BEATZ!!!
[Galaxy Y GT-S5360 and Duos 6102 Q&A, Help & Troubl] TingTingin:
Can u check please :)

This post uses the patented TingTingin®™ method I would teach it to you but you are not yet worthy (come back in a hundred years)
[Galaxy Y GT-S5360 and Duos 6102 Q&A, Help & Troubl] -CALIBAN666-:
My sreen

GREETZ WITH TAP A TALKED BEATZ!!!
[Galaxy Y GT-S5360 and Duos 6102 Q&A, Help & Troubl] TingTingin:
My whatever language that is is a little rusty can individual icons in the app drawer be changed or not

This post uses the patented TingTingin®™ method I would teach it to you but you are not yet worthy (come back in a hundred years)