yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Vintage144:
MODEL:

samsung -sgh-i777

ANDROID VERSION:

2.3.4

BASEBAND VERSION:

I777UCKK6

KERNEL VERSION:

2.6.35.7

BUILD NUMBER

GINGERBREAD.UCKH7

Just seems odd that the baseband is different from the build number , do I have a potential problem here?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] dsmboost:
Have you flashed anything or is this a completely stock phone?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Vintage144:
its not stock , it was purchased recently , it had a bug in the root and was a 9100 root , I flashed it back it had the latest firmare release ,, not sure what it was ,but with the BB not matching the build it seams kinda funny , I think my wife let samsung upgrade the firmare again, but Im not sure! Everything works fine , and I have no plans to do anything other than put cwm in enventually)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] dsmboost:
Honestly, it doesn't matter. You can have any modem you want regardless of what it says in "build number". As long as you're flashing GB modem on a GB rom and ICS modem on an ICS rom, you're fine.

And in case you don't know, Modem and Baseband are synonymous.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Nick281051:
Not exactly, you can run any modem on any Rom.

Sent from my Zanpakuto using Getsuga Tensho!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] dsmboost:
Actually, I was thinking it didn't matter, but I wasn't sure. Thanks for confirming. I believe the only thing that matters is whether it's a TW modem or AOSP modem. Correct me if I'm wrong on that.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] j510:
Just Ota update it and should resolve the mismatch. There shouldn't be a problem even if you don't update.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Nick281051:
Actually that's not correct either. The only difference between the two zips are a few things in the updater script if I remember right.

Sent from my Zanpakuto using Getsuga Tensho!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II SGH-I777] Vintage144:
It has a root and CM so thats all I care to do with it , it runs fine , and its my wifes phone , so if you guys say it cool , im down with that, me Im running i717 Note ICS , so I am changing stuff in there , I find it interesting how different Android is through different platforms ,I ve been doing this with my tablet for several years now , nightly builds and yet through the phone it seems like a forign language , maybe its just Samsung , but I had (root /Inter-Op unlock ) on my Samsung focus and and a Custom rom there as well and it didnt seem as confusing !
[HTC One X] falko123:
Hi I need some help, may be I'm too stupid this time. I wanted to upgrade to ARHD 17.1 today. In order to do that I checked my CID and it is HTC_622, so JB should work.

My actual HBoot is 0.94 and I relocked my Bootloader and used the fastboot rebootRUU command. than I tried to flash the firmware from this thread: http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1957376

and I got the message:

failed <remote: 42 custom id check fail>

any idea what I did wrong?

Thank you for your help! :)

EDIT: Crazy but now it worked so it's fixed :)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] calvinljh:
Hi All,

I have test & upload some my work of Icon change for

CM10 A3/A4 Flash.zip file.

Tested, A3 & A4 also can work fine.

Toggle Icon change:-

1) Alarm Clock

2) AirPlane mode

3) Wifi

4) Bluetooth and blar blar blar

Wifi strength icon change also

Herewith some printscreen attached.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] GuestK0094:
Hi !

Can We get some screenshots ?

Thanks
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] nandujanuary02:
cm9

is there any replacements for cm9?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] calvinljh:
never try on CM9. will look into it later.
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] Krazeee:
Ever since I've started flashing ROMs, I've become accustomed to jumping on the market and re-installing all the apps that were deleted during the wipe process. No problem really, I like the idea of a fresh install. However, oddly enough, since flashing Ev1lArt's Wicked v7 and now his JB v3 Roms, the apps from the store persist. Third party apks are still in my downloads and I can re-install them, but the ones from the market instantly start downloading and updating once the phone is done booting up.

On one hand, I think it's fantastic! No more searching the store for all the apps I want.

On the other hand I'm concerned this is an indication of something gone wrong.

If anybody has any insight, I'd be very grateful. Thanks!

Edit: Another question/afterthought. When I went from Wicked v7 (ICS) to v3 (JB) I used Odin and the root66 tar for a clean JB install. I was under the impression partitions would be re-allocated during this process, but there was no PIT file and the instructions are very clear about which boxes to check (ie, don't check re-partition). Am I missing something? Are PIT files not necessary going from ICS to JB? Also interesting to note, when I booted up after ODIN, my apps, wallpapers, Nova Launcher setup etc were all still there. I thought the point of doing a fresh ODIN install was to get the phone to an "out of the box" condition.

Am I just a worry wort? Should I just be happy that some Android magic has saved me some hassle? Thanks again.
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] psykhotic:
Google is supposed to back up what was on your phone and then red download it (restore) from the play store. Downloads always stay, unless you wipe it.
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] Krazeee:
When you say "wipe it", do you mean wipe data/factory reset in recovery? Cuz I always do that.
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] psykhotic:
That doesn't wipe storage/sdcard. The folders you see when you plug into a computer. Uninstalling apps also doesn't delete those folders :(
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] killj0y:
On some roms when you flash on the locations setup screen it will ask if you want to restore your apps from google play...if you leave it checked it well immediately start downloading your apps based off your google account...
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] shahkam:
Googles backs your data up always when flashing a new rom fireup the play store and go throught the log in thingy there will be an option that you can tick it says "keep my phone backed up whit google" simply untick and voila... its no issue at all trust me :)
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] Krazeee:
Lol, and here I thought that was for calendar, mail, contacts etc. Thanks a ton. As long as it's working as advertised and not some fluke.

Thanks!
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] shahkam:
It does work whitout hassle neat feature if you ask me

:Cheers:
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] psykhotic:
It's funny cuz I always check that box during setup and I've flashed at least 10 ROMs and it's never reinstalled my apps.
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] shahkam:
Really ? Works fine for me go to settings before flashing another rom i remember somewhere there is an option to keep the phone backed up.. not in the play store but the main settings itself..
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] jcbofkc:
If you are a little paranoid and want a true clean install, wipe system in recovery before you install your preferred rom. The Google restore had been hit and miss for me over the years so I stopped checking the box and relied on titanium backup. Sounds like it is working better now.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] sinman02:
Is it me, or has development for this phone gone the way of the dinosaur? This is not a complaint... Just an honest question... With all due respect for the smart developers who have contributed their valuable time to developing /porting roms for our device I feel like the development has come to almost a standstill. I've been on these forums since the heady windows mobile days and I don't remember seeing such a lull in development. I check these forums daily for a nugget of new features or bug fixes. It seems like most of the original development roms pretty much came to a stop the beginning of November. I'm just wondering if I'm missing something. Has everyone sold their gs3s and gone to the note 2? It's disappointing because I love my phone and I've only had since September. I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one wondering....
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] kintwofan:
Its just you. I just counted nine ROMs updated in December alone and at least 4 original updated in December.

Original may have slowed simply because most devs are waiting to get there hands on 4.2. Which by the way there are already like 2 or 3 in the works.... Including the official cm10.1.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] funnyperson1:
Yeah it seems like everyone pretty much started working on 4.2 when Google released that code.

When we start to see CM10.1 nightlies then I think you'll see the original development pick back up. The problem is that everyone seems to depend on cm or aokp for the low - level code and until they get things sorted out, none of the aosp ROMs are going to be changing much.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] blestsol:
It's just you. Sometimes development slows.

Go check out the thunderbolt forums lol.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] eman3316@optonline.net:
I do not think the Thunderbolt would be a fair comparison. You are talking about a flagship device of the S3 compared to a device that was released on Sprint as the EVO a year earlier then the Thunderbolt. The Thunderbolt was a failed device before it was even released. And HTC wonders why they lose money qtr after qtr.

Verizon needs another Nexus device! If the GNEX was not such a POS I would still own it...There is nothing better then getting Googles latest updates and knowing your device actually has a future...Even though Verizon took a while to release an official JB update for the GNEX we had a fully working JB Rom like a day or 2 after Google announced the OS and that was with everything working. If I was not in contract I would seriously be thinking about leaving Verizon just I could get a Nexus 4. It stinks to be at the mercy of these manufactures and carriers.

And while we have great devs it is no walk in the park to bring AOSP to these devices. We still do not have a fully non buggy AOSP Rom for the S3.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] kidhudi:
whatchu smokin?
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] kintwofan:
Check they're Google plus website there was a screenshot of it booted up. Also look at the unofficial ones they are taking from the official tree. There's also an official AOKP, here

http://rootzwiki.com/topic/31679-official-aokp-d2vzw-421-preview-builds/

Oh ya here you go about official cm10.1

http://betanews.com/2012/12/04/cyan...e-nexus-10-soon-for-us-samsung-galaxy-s-iiis/
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] suXor:
I would also say that development scales based on how much is liked or hated on the device from the manufacturer. I find that less development generally means less demand for changes.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S III
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] Atamagaokashii:
It is comparable. The thunderbolt was the flagship lte phone. My brother gave me his tbolt and I put some use into it. For only a single core oc'd to what my CPU could tolerate at 1.5 it was a trooper. Big screen, first phone with talk and simultaneous data need I say more? Oh right dat kickstand. You wanna see slow go trudge in there for awhile. We waited for ICS for forever and I think HTC is still tugging their chains.

Tl;dr were fine.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] razz1:
I don't think there is a lack of development for this device. There isn't anything real earth shaking right now but we have come such a long way! So many great things have been accomplished! We have great devs and quality roms. The best thing I can recommend is inviting the devs in the T-Mobile and all the other service providers with a GS3. Visit there forums on XDA and contact there rom developers. I have done that and have at least one coming this way. There is nothing wrong with a fresh face and new ideas. Nonetheless, I'm impressed with our consistent development especially considering the holidays!
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] mentose457:
Another thing to consider is that many of the developers are students. Finals for many of them are the end of November or the beginning of December. Chances are they took a break to study as school is more important than the free stuff they do on these boards.
[Atrix 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Samanousky:
I had problems with my ROM and had to reinstall another ROM STOCK. But after I reinstalled the front speaker stopped working. I can only hear calls through speakerphone. Help please.

I did this procedure:
[Atrix 4G Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Samanousky:
up!
[Android Software/Hacking General [Developers Only]] Yago10:
Hi all,

I have a problem, im trying to modify an apk with APK Manager 4.9, i descompile it, i go to projects, i modify the .smali files, i go to the script i select the project with the option 22 and i compile (option 11) and sign (option 12). But the .smali files dont changed. i try to delete de classes.dex in the keep folder, but the changes dont saved in the .smali files. Help please. This .apk is for run on bluestacks.

And sorry for my bad english.
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Corndude:
Even with new kernels and software upgrades? They're at least supposed to be even but instead the nexus 4 lacks battery and processing power in nearly every test. Is this still the case and if so, why?
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] spitefulcheerio:
I've read that the battery in the Nexus 4 lasts longer and search a term called "thermal throttling"

BTW, benchmarks arent worth ****
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] italia0101:
if your talking about Quadrant .. it is NOT thermal throttling.. it doesn't throttle within 30 seconds, the only test my Nexus has throttled with was glbenchmark , and that was with everything ticked..
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] _Johnito_:
Tweaked kernels and hacks (like undervolting) adress some issues for sure ! Less heat/throttling and even some battery gain. But i'm pretty sure the Optimus G is still ahead in perfs AND battery, without even consider its own tweaked kernels. (-> I own a Nexus 4, but i have only tested the G with everything stock)

I guess the question is about the price you are ready to pay, and where you stand considering system updates or modified user experience. Besides that, the Optimus G just is a better device. Both are equally smooth in every day use though ...
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] spitefulcheerio:
lol if youre basing which phone is "better" off of quadrant scores, you need to reevaluate what youre looking for in a phone. High quadrant scores don't always translate to a smooth, fluid, enjoyable user experience. The nexus 4 is lightyears ahead of the optimus G in terms of user experience.
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Corndude:
Guys, I know that benchmarks don't say too much about daily use. But still. Those two devices are almost EXACTLY the same. What part of the nexus 4 did google **** up so badly that the optimus g comes out ahead in almost everything?
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] darkmanx2g:
Android 4.2 is not optimized for quadrant. Real world performance use debunks it. Nexus 4 is a smooth and enjoyable experience. Why are you putting so much in quadrant scores?
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] zephiK:
How would it be worse? Troll post
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] yyz71:
Seriously:good:

---------- Post added at 11:17 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:15 AM ----------

I think you need to worry about your own phone SGS II :D
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] linelock:
Optimus G has Android 4.04

Nexus 4 has Android 4.2.1

That is a much bigger deal then overaggressive thermal throttling which will be fixed eventually. Also as someone coming from the LG P999, I wouldn't want to depend on LG for any software updates again. It will get its planned update to 4.1.1 but after that I wouldn't count on anything.

I don't know what the OG is getting for battery but I've been getting over 5hrs screen on time lately which is pretty good.
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] wreckone:
I'm think LG is tampering with it's products - you would think that phones with supposedly similar hardware would perform accordingly. After all the N4 is running pure android and most folks would of given the edge to the N4. The truth is out there somewhere :confused: just saying ;)
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] KyraOfFire:
You know, every single stuff *put company name here* put out, they tweak the heck out of their stuff to have high benchmark score.

Heard that new Apple GPU is 4x faster than newest Android GPU, or newest Android CPU is twice as fast as newest Apple CPU? So now you know what I meant.
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Corndude:
@ zephik & yyz

Accusing me of trollposting... How about you read every single ****ing test that is out there? All of them say that the optimus g is miles ahead of the nexus 4 hardwarewise.

@ Kyra of Fire

Apple's gotta be doing something right. Their stupid phone lasts twice as long as the nexus 4 even though it has a much higher display brightness and a smaller battery. Oh and before anybody comes up with "Blabla but nex4 has more cores, they need more energy." Yea right, I don't know how many cores you think your phone uses on webbrosing but it won't be more than 1 or maximum 2, so not more than the iphone's got.

http://www.autoomobile.com/news/lg-nexus-4-battery-life-tips/1009720/

I quote:

GSMArena put it to the test and found that when it came to talk time tests four of the 1.5GHz Krait core remained idle and the battery did well with 14:17 hours. However it was 1 hour short of the Optimus G, which the LG Nexus 4 is based on.

In regards to the web browsing test on the Samsung Galaxy Nexus, this was the worst ever seen. The LG Nexus 4 therefore didn’t have to do too much to beat it. It went on for 4 hours and 34 minutes on just one charge. If you look at the larger picture however this is still a poor score when you consider that the iPhone 5 was two times as long.
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] KyraOfFire:
LG's engineers sneaked a puppy in while they designed the Optimus G (didn't happen with the Nexus 4)

Apple engineers, meanwhile, drank a tank of steroid.

That's why.
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] hephappy:
Nexus 4 is far better than optimus g
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Locksmith81:
To each their own... Played with an OG in person... it's nice... But not for me. I like being able to do with what I please to my phone. Hence I got the N4. As far as battery. I'm a heavy user and with my current setup I was able to steam using tunein for over 6hours during my work shift.. Kaokao all day... Full sync... Gnow enabled.... Not crippling my phone or turning off data syncs...left my 10hr work shift and was just under 40%...not bad in my book
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] ijeff:
The A6 does use a very beefy GPU. Apple has tended to do this for quite awhile now. The iPad 3rd generation and 4th generation are notably unmatched. This is not due to benchmark tweaks, they just source better chips for their products.
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] meangreenie:
LG doctored our s4-quads :{
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] KyraOfFire:
^ this is just argument for the sake of argument.....

If you don't want Apple, then insert Nvidia, AT&T, T Mobile, Samsung, or WalMart, or US Department of Defense, or whatever.

Every of them have a nice chart showing how their stuff is better than someone else's stuff. Regardless of wether it is true, false or somewhere in between.

The point is, benchmark tells nothing. Yet, the company will have fancy bechmark to market their product becuase people like you guys love it.
[Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] darkmanx2g:
Dude get a grip. Do you have a nexus 4 or not? I have one and it performs considerably well. And i was coming from a galaxy nexus. All your doing is whining about benchmarks which is irrelevant due to different software. Again 4.2 is not optimized yet!
[Android General] scandiun:
EDITED: Virtual money can be modified using Game Guardian, so you can unlock all cars and tracks and get rid of the crapware.

I've downloaded a beloved racing game, Offroad Legends. The things is, its free. But free like free s.h.i.t.. You can play the "tour" cups, but once you get to the real game, you can't continue because you need virtual money, which you don't have even if you complete 3-stars in all levels.

In order to get more virtual money, you are redirected to an ads site which is https://ws.joyads.com/

It requires you to download some crap third party games and stuff in order to get some more money, or do online surveys on online websites the kind that Avast usually blocks because of doubtful intentions.

And on the other hand, you have the iOS version, which you can get for 0,99$ and you get the real deal.

How much time Android users do we need to wait until it is a serious platform, where developers can really commit to.
[Nexus 10 General] jonstrong:
Anyone who has tried to install the Swype beta on their new Nexus 10 recently probably ran into problems trying to install it (sticks at checking versions). Nuance has fixed that problem and as of this morning Swype will install successfully on the Nexus 10 running 4.2.1.

Anyone interested can check it out at beta.Swype.com. I love it on my galaxy nexus....not entirely sure I prefer it to the stock 4.2.1 keyboard with gestures. Still going back and forth between them.
[RAZR i Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] WannabeMKII:
As soon as I turn on tethering and connect, I instantly get "Tethering: Mobile data link lost"?

This is the same for both wireless and USB.

Any suggestions welcome, as I've a train journey tomorrow where I was hoping to tether and work...
[RAZR i Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] j4nosf:
You may find the solution under http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2018166

[Q] Data Tethering
[RAZR i Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] WannabeMKII:
You my friend are a legend! I must've missed that thread. I simply added ",dun" to the APN type and it's up and running! :good:

Awesome, that'll make the train journey better!
[Galaxy Note II General] mayank_nigam:
Hi guys..

I'm not very sure if i shud be posting in the Dev section but this is an important topic and this is the easiest way I could get attention of the developers...

After my note 1 being stolen, i was thinking of ways of making the phone theft proof.

And I came up witha few things.

1. Prevent phone from being switched off with the power button withouta password

2. Prevent factory reset withouta password

3. Prevent recovery or download mode withouta password.

I'm d sure if these things can sine how be implemented then or note 2 will be theft proof.

Its all upto the devs now

Moderator please don't delete this...its serious matter.
[Galaxy Note II General] garyd9:
it's also not a dev discussion topic. thread moved.
[Galaxy Note II General] RambJoe:
I have Android Locator Pro, so if someone gets my unlock code wrong, it takes a picture of them and emails it to me with their location.
[Galaxy Note II General] nyda83:
if they are connected to internet...:cyclops:
[Galaxy Note II General] B3311:
Avast! Anti-theft (free, play store) does 1 and 2, pretty sure it does 3 too.
[Galaxy Note II General] daz_2000:
People would just take battery out. Perhaps a dev can give you some super glue to stick the back cover on?
[Galaxy Note II General] RambJoe:
They wouldn't be able to disconnect it from HSPA+ without the unlocking the phone though.
[Galaxy Note II General] chinaa:
I always thought about putting a sort of chip in the phone that can makes a lot of noise if a button is pressed on a telecomand lol.

I dont know if that is possible to do, I'm not really good with electronics stuff.

this would work if you're in a certain area of the incident
[Galaxy Note II General] mayank_nigam:
I also have avast... but you can get around it by putting new ROM from odin
[Galaxy Note II General] mayank_nigam:
Are you a retard?

The thief would certainly freak out if he tries to switch off the phone and it won't shut down...

It could be of some help, but putting a password to enter download mode is fool proof! If only someone could do it!