yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Theoriginalgiga:
who was smoking what when that was reported, I mean 6.3" screen? that isn't a phone or even a phablet anymore... but yes I'd buy one as well. :)

Mod Edit

Is that what she said?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] scottx .:
That's too big. I have a 7" tablet and I couldn't imagine lugging it around all the time or talking/texting on it. Plus I have to have an otterbox defender on everything I own and it would be crazy huge.

They should make a 5.5" phone and the normal 7/8.? & 10 inch tablets.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Clark Joseph Kent:
OK, we do not need any of that type of discussion regarding size issues on a personal matter, if you need to comment on your self, then maybe some inadequacy is involved, never the less it is not needed, that type of posting.

Thank You and Thread Cleaned.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] BlackZenith:
I'm ready to see some more phablet competition as well. Seeing as I probably will never get a phone that is smaller than the Note 1, I am kinda stuck with the Note line. I don't really like how the Note 2 got thinner but, what choice do I have if I want to upgrade?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] kornklown69:
I feel the same way... but i do want a n4 since its already subsidized and i can save my upgrade
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] DesignGrits:
If they make a 7" galaxy note tablet I will be all in. The gnote 10.1 was perfect but way overpriced when you compare it to todays top of the line tablets
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] COA4178:
Lol in that case im glad i didnt bought the note2 lol
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Christogq:
Sorry guys/gals. I was just being silly. Yeah I'd get this for sure.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jimmer411:
My upgrade is in November 2013. If it follows the same pattern as the sg2 and 3 with the note having superior specs it will be a no brainier. I can't wait.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] jackxlj:
I think the sgs3/note2 are last with different specs. Samsungs cpus are lte compatible now, so from here on out im betting the difference between the two will be screen soze and spen only
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] DesignGrits:
Same for me, perfect timing

I thought that will be the only difference. Samsung is rumored to come out with a unbreakable phone soon.....maybe the S3. Which leads people to think that they will be using the new Flex screens and full screen display to make it possible. Can you imagine a 6"3 inch pure screen phone? Sounds amazing!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] methylenedioxy:
Flexible eh? Wearing it like a watch? lol~
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] DesignGrits:
No no no... they already showed off a demo of a phone that flexes. It means the screen can't crack and curves.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Xstop:
...and this was back 2011

That would be pretty cool to see it on the next Note. But this is all rumors...Let the speculation begin. LOL I can see this thread having a lot of pages

[YOUTUBE]HU2nG9qy6vs[/YOUTUBE]
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] kornklown69:
http://m.pocketnow.com/2012/12/13/samsung-rumors-note-iii-galaxy-s-iv
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] gregsarg:
I'd like one ....or two .....or ??

My Gosh .....I'm a gnote addict ....

Help me Joe !!!.......LOL
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] BlackZenith:
Awe man, I can't wait to see this. They should release that thing as the Note 3 XL. My guess is that's gonna be too big for alot of people, not too big for me though. But I can't see that being the only offer as the next iteration in the Note line. I just think there has gotta be some middle ground in between a 4.8 inch GS4 and a 6.3 inch Note 3...

So something like:

Galaxy S4 Mini = 4in (current size of the S3 Mini)

Galaxy S4 = 4.8in (current size of the S3)

Galaxy Note 3 = 5.5in (current size of the Note 2)

Galaxy Note 3 XL = 6.3in
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] DesignGrits:
Never too big ;D But I would love a full screen like the GNexus
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] nivek_k2020:
I'll take 1.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] bigmout:
I'm guessing miscommunication/mistranslation. I have big hands, but 6.3 inches strikes me as too cumbersome to hold on calls.

Still, I'd love to see Samsung revive Asus's original idea for an Eee Pad MeMo and pair a 7-inch Note with a small bluetooth handset for calls.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] methylenedioxy:
flex = bending the phone, bending the phone = wearing it like a watch, or anywhere on your body if you'd like... LOL.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] chak29:
I think the 6.3 note its there new low cost tablet. not the note 3 with the phone. I saw some news. Samsung is trying to make a low cost tablet.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] DesignGrits:
Even if that is the case which it very well could be, I will buy it. I really wanted the 10.1 but because of the cost and reviews I didn't get one. But my buddy at work has one and its super nice, just needs to be cheaper and slightly smaller won't bug me. :D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] DARKCHYLDX101:
If Huawei is coming out with a 6.1 in phone. Samsung is going bigger. I bet it'll come with Nav buttons and thin bezel so the phone itself won't look so huge. Also so Apple can't say anything about the physical home button on the bottom. S4 is tipped for a 5in screen. Im just speculating still to early to tell.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Shane Oo Mac:
5.5 or 6 inch screen would be nice.

Thats why I'm holding out for the

Note 3 and skiping the Note 2.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] DesignGrits:
Me too :D

Fingers crossed on a full screen display
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] kornklown69:
agreed android makes buttons obsolete
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] DARKCHYLDX101:
Didn't one of the S3 prototypes have on screen buttons. I remember seeing it on you tube. Then I read somewhere Samsung decided to use a physical home button instead.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Geor!:
Now that's one big "phone!"
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] Theoriginalgiga:
I'm right there with you. The note 2, beautiful as it is, doesn't have enough changes for us who would have to pay full price. But when the 3 comes out or the 2 has been out for a while I might snag one on the cheap
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] shaolinx:
I skipped the note 2. it is not worth the upgrade but will deffinitely buy the 3! never too big~
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy Note I717] DesignGrits:
Although I also am skipping the GNote2 I would have to say that the GNote2 is by far the best phone on the market. Destroys everything else in all the comparison videos online.
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Asimo2012:
Hello there!

I recently installed the UltimaRom V.6.0.2 on my Gti9300.

Everything seems to working grand other than the data connection which does not function, 'mobile network state' is 'disconnected' and 'roaming is 'not roaming' under status in the settings (please see attached screenshot) so cannot choose internet, whatsapp etc.

This has been checked in the mobile network options, but this will not function regardless. I then thought it might be due to the option to install the baseband version and I chose I9300XXDLI8. Is this where the problem lies since I am receiving and still able to make calls and texts.

I am a t-mobile customer in the UK with 'everything everywhere', I believe the APN settings are OK. I can still send and receive MMS, but no data connection...

Please help me out!
[Galaxy S III Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Asimo2012:
The Rom on installation gives me the choice to install the following baseband versions:

XXELJ2

DDDLJ1

NEDLI1

XXDLID

XXDLIB

XXDLI8

Have I installed the wrong one?
[HTC One X] zettez:
I have Hboot 1.36 and I want a stable ROM. Would you recommend a ROM with either 4.1 or 4.2? For instance, Cyanogenmod has two ROMs for either 4.1 or 4.2.
[HTC One X] TToivanen:
Obviously 4.1 is more stable because it has been around longer.

In fact the "official" CM10.1 for One X hasn't been released yet.
[HTC One X] zettez:
How does this work then? http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1784185. I guess they took the CM10.1 source code that is in development and built their own implementation?
[HTC One X] Alex240188:
That is correct, if the dev gets it to a stable state on the one x, the cm team may make it the official build for this device
[HTC One X] mbsmbhs:
for sure 4.1 is more stable. cm 10 all hboot worked fine for me. link to cm10 post rom 4.1.2 is stable.:good:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1784185
[Blade General] cramhead:
Hi

Have Cm 5 installed on this san francisco II but every time I try and install a rom other than fish & chips I get this error

It's 2nd gen....and im out of ideas

anyone know what I can do to get a 4.0 rom working on my 2gen? It came with 2.3 stock installed
[Blade General] keviv77:
Download the ROM again n then try. U can flash cm9 the same way u r flashing cm7.

Sent from my Blade
[Blade General] cramhead:
I've tried LOADS of roms all the same message
[Blade General] De@n:
You can't flash San Francisco 1 ROMs on San Francisco 2 :rolleyes:

OSF2 CM7

http://www.modaco.com/topic/353378-...7-for-the-zte-crescent-rom-last-updated-2806/
[Blade General] udaytalwaronline:
In recovery wipe data

Then update from ur rom.

(I'm not sure it'll work)
[Blade General] Blazed2:
Had the same thing

All thr ROMS give me the same error. And I have a Blade2 Gen2 and tried lots of gen2 ROM's
[Blade General] De@n:
Why are you trying to flash a ROM that's Not ment to work on your device? :banghead:
[Blade General] Blazed2:
I couldn't know if it was for my device, I couldn't boot into the ROM, it was erased and I had no way to recover.

Finally, after 3 days of searching I found out that I had wiped all my SDcard, internal memory and recovery, so I was left with nothing, luckily, this post saved my life www(dot)modaco(dot)com/topic/361126-zte-blade-ii-p735tb01-msm7225a1ghz-roms-ftm-back-to-stock/

And yes, I can't find any place to download Mr Pigfish to install a custom ROM.
[Asus Transformer TF700] hong90:
Nvm.
[General Questions and Answers] gat0rjay:
I have a question regarding the feasibility of using an SSH Tunnel to achieve a specific goal.

I recently added my wife to my T-Mobile plan. We have excellent reception and coverage practically everywhere - except in her office. I think it has something to do with the thick metal roof on her building.

Anyway, connecting to her office Wifi, and enabling Wifi-calling allows all SMS/Call traffic through. The problem is that when making/receiving calls on Wifi, there is no audio transmitted through on either end. Wifi-calling works just fine from home, which leads me to believe that her enterprise IT department has blocked certain ports on the firewall that the T-Mobile Wifi-calling needs to operate correctly.

My questions is: If I create an SSH server on my WHS here at home (we have FIOS 30/15, with a low 2 digit ping, so bandwidth/latency shouldn't be an issue), can I then tunnel all of her android office-wifi-traffic through that SSH Server - and would that theoretically allow all ports to be open/available?

Before I take the time to set it all up, I just want a second opinion that it should work.

Thanks.
[General Questions and Answers] neim81094:
Wouldn't having it travel through the internet make it potentially public data being transferred? I know the office building I work in also has crummy connection and they are on high alert with potential "hackers", and when the IT people see that there is a direct connect from their servers to your house, they'll block it and you might get into trouble.

Sent from my SGH-T999

If I helped please press the thanks button :)
[General Questions and Answers] gat0rjay:
The way it would work (in my head) is that my WHS would act as an SSH proxy server. She would connect to her office wifi, then on her phone, she would use the SSH Tunnel app to define the location of my WHS as her SSH proxy server. All of her internet traffic would be sent (using her office wifi) directly to the WHS at home, the WHS, would then translate all of the traffic out to the internet, and return the results back through the SSH tunnel.

It should work, I'm just not sure if anyone with a more real-world working knowledge of this stuff has any input for me?
[General Questions and Answers] neim81094:
Why don't you try it with another WiFi? Like Starbucks or something test to see if that method will work that is definitely an interesting idea.

Sent from my SGH-T999

If I helped please press the thanks button :)
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] Gunnett:
I am currently running CleanROM 2.5 w/ CleanKernel running TWRP. What is the best method to make the transition to CleanROM 5.5.1. Also what kernel does everyone run. What launcher do people like best?
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] dark_system:
I used latest TWRP, Data Wipe/Cache Wipe/Dalvik Cache Wipe.

Flash CleanRom 5.5.1

Reboot!

There is no CleanKernel for the latest CleanRom's, but LeanKernel 1.1 Should work fine. Don't forget to make backup first.

I haven't seen any advantage in OCing or leankernel over the stock kernel in Cleanrom for day to day stuff, but YMMV.

Good Luck!
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] Gunnett:
Will it automatically flash the stock kernel over the old CleanKernel?
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] vtfan99:
Backup your apps with titanium backup. I also flashed the new RPM and modem. I realize these are debatable but it does seem to have improved my battery life. YMMV.
[Verizon Samsung Galaxy S III] CockyRob:
Yes. The kernel is included in the rom.
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] Idyar:
There is a couple of things that I will always have in my notification window (Blocking on Touchwiz and Clock on Touchwiz) I know many roms have the ability to hide certain notifications I was wondering if there was an easy way to remove them, like a third party app that lets you white list or black list certain notifications.

Thanks!
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] elesbb:
What are you trying to remove? If its an "ongoing" notification the only way to remove it is by hacking the apk and telling it not to put the notif there.
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] za996:
Hello guys,

i have got a smartphone and a tablet android (lg optimus black-[ jelly bam 4.1 rom]- Nexus 7) and i wonder if I can syncronize my files with cloud storage.

I tried BOX,skydrive,dropbox,google drive but I never found (maybe because I'm noob) the feature of ICloud: if I put i file into a cloud box, it will automatically syncronize this element with all my devices.

Hope you can help me. Thank's for your time.
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] coolsandie:
Try Jottacloud for Android. It works the same way like iCloud (I guess so) for syncing between Contacts/Media files/Photos/SMS/MMS across multiple devices.

If you register you'll get an initial 5GB of space, but if you use any referral links you get instant 10GB of space (Search for Jottacloud thread here at XDA, you can get many referral links posted by others) and when you use the android app, you'll get another 2GB extra.
[Android Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] za996:
Thank you
[Galaxy S III General] neilbrady:
Hey guys, I have the pebble blue galaxy S3 and it has a small crack on the side. Can you buy the official shell for them (maybe in white or the new red color) and where would the best place be. Thanks lads :)
[Galaxy S III General] slaphead20:
do you mean the back cover?
[Galaxy S III General] Mrboxfacetramp13:
I think that he does

:cowboy:
[Galaxy S III General] neilbrady:
Yeah back cover, sides and front.
[Galaxy S III General] oToNo28:
Same problem, I want to change the front cover.
[Galaxy S III General] neilbrady:
Anyone have any advice for myself and

oToNo28 please?
[Galaxy S III General] 23Six:
Back cases are common online (Amazon, eBay) although they're not polycarbonate (metallic) or genuine from what o have seen.

Sent from my GT-I9300
[Galaxy S III General] mwatson:
http://tvcmallcellphoneaccessories....g-bezel-cover-replacement-and-save-money.html

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Full-Hous...sung-Galaxy-S-III-S3-i9300-Blue-/251095098244

http://www.etradesupply.com/oem-samsung-galaxy-s-iii-s3-gt-i9300-housing.html
[Galaxy S III General] neilbrady:
Thanks for the links mate great help.
[General Questions and Answers] twinsen.net:
I have a question regarding some hardware components in Android. As we know, switching them on and off through some software API

was disabled by Google, due to security reasons. For example, GPS (on device without root acceess) can only be enabled or disabled

by exact option in menu, but not by third party software. Same for 2g/3g network access, and sometimes even for display brightness...

So, my question is why it can't be done easy way by simply removing that security code from sources? Android is open source operating

system, sources are published by Google, aren't they? So, why these workarounds like RIL code injection (2g/3g), or some root access

helpers (Secure Settings from GP)? It is really so hard to handle such a hardware like GPS or radio mode?

I'm using Cyanogenmod 10 on Samsung Galaxy S, which is theoretically "impossible" to run Jelly Bean (as Samsung decided).

But even in this advanced mod, the hardware switches aren't working well. So, I'm not asking for CM10 itself, but about whole

conception. This is stupid for me, that's hindering people using Android smartphones...
[Nexus 10 General] suzook:
I just sold my transformer prime infinity...and coming from that, im disappointed with the screen. How could a lower resolution screen on the prime look sharper than the one on the nexus?
[Nexus 10 General] natkingcole:
Well I was just looking around here and I don't have a Nexus 10. I got a Galaxy Note 10.1 and from my experience the picture matters a lot.

I mean there are a lot of wallpaper sites with ultra HD and optimized wallpapers for retina display, but the same resolution is not always the same sharpness. some are crappy cropped or zoomed.

Use quickpic to set your background picture. The stock gallery app sometimes crops the pictures false.

And pictures with a resolution below the maximum resolution will always look a bit crappy. that means that when you are using a fullHD picture, which was nice for transformer prime, it can look less sharp on a display with higher resolution like nexus 10
[Nexus 10 General] Funkym0nkey:
I too come from Prime and there is no contest, this screen is sharper than Prime by miles.

How stuff looks will depend on what you are seeing.

If you have set regular wallpaper, it will look all blurry thanks to resolution. Even so called HD wallpapers will look blurry on this. You need to go search for wallpapers for MacBook Pro retina and use those on this tablet using quickpic. None of the apps from Android market have good wallpapers that are having native resolution of this tablet.

Text is sharp and crisp on this.

Most arcade games are not optimised for this screen and look terrible or blurry. That is not screen's fault.

Desktop web pages look nice full and crisp. So only real issue of lack of sharpness comes into picture when the content is not ready for screen. That includes apps, images and games.
[Nexus 10 General] Techie2012:
I also come from Prime.

I wouldn't say the Prime screen looks sharper than the Nexus 10. Reading text on the N10, for example, the resolution is really amazing, very nice on the Nexus 10.

The colors and brightness and blacks is a different story. The Prime had those 3 much nicer than the Nexus 10. I loved playing Marble Blast on the Prime, the graphics looked amazingly vivid. On the Nexus 10 they appear as meh.
[Nexus 10 General] suzook:
Its the prime infinity. Drastic difference. What a shame. Gonna put the nex up 4sale.
[Nexus 10 General] 404 ERROR:
It's mainly because a lot of apps and mobile sites and such aren't made for the resolution. It's made for a smaller resolution, so to make up for that, the apps, mobile sites, and whatever else are all upscaled to fit the 2560x1600 resolution. While upscaling allows you to view things bigger, it will also make everything else a slightly blurry. There are upscaling algorithms to make it look better, but basically it's impossible to make upscaled images look as good as a native 2560x1600 image.

A 720p 10" screen (Note 10.1) will show a 720p video the cleanest because the video outputs a ratio of exactly 1:1 pixels.

A 1080p 10" screen (TF prime) will show a 720p video a bit blurrier because the video outputs a ratio of 2.25:1 pixels.

A 1440p 10" screen (N10) will show a 720p video the blurriest because the video outputs a ratio of 4:1 pixels. (I know the N10 has a 1600p screen, it's just to make calculations slightly easier)

Now when using a 1080p video, a 720p screen will show no improvement because the screen can't output those extra pixels.

When using a 1080p screen, the screen will look sharper than that 720p screen because you have more information. Consider watching TV of a 10x10 resolution vs 1920x1080 resolution. The 1920x1080p resolution will look far better

Once again, the 1440p will look slightly blurry.

Now when you use a 1440p video, you can probably guess which screen will output that video the cleanest.

So basically, this high resolution thing is good mainly for texts as of right now since nothing is really optimized for a screen beyond 1080p.
[Nexus 10 General] Nitemare3219:
Anyone who thinks its possible for a much lower resolution screen to be sharper is a fool. This screen is absolutely dazzling. Though content displayed is obviously going to have an affect.

And just to shove some numbers in your face:

N10 - 300.24 PPI (2560x1600 @ 10.055") 4,096,000 pixels (78% MORE)

Prime Infinity - 226.42 PPI (1920x1200 @ 10") 2,304,000 pixels

That's a huge difference.
[Nexus 10 General] ZaelFaroe:
I actually have to disagree with you a little bit here. 720p video should look just as good on the Nexus 10 as it does on the Note 10.1. 1280x800 times 2 is 2560x1600. Because of that each pixel of a 720p video will take up exactly 4 pixels on the Nexus 10; however those 4 pixels on the N10 are the same area that would be a single pixel on the Note 10.1. This is a clean ratio. On the TF700 you got to 1920x1200 which is 1.5 times 1280x800. This is not a whole ratio and means that pixels of a 720p video will take up between 1 and 4 pixels on the TF700 display (determined by a fancy algorithm for scaling images).

The Nexus 10 playing 1080p video should have about the same blurriness as the TF700 playing 720p video.
[Nexus 10 General] suzook:
Did you have a prime to compare it to? Sorry, but text IS crisper on the prime. I see it with my 20/20 eyes.
[Nexus 10 General] NeoMagus:
Lol as a former owner of both (returned Prime C1 for 700 a C6 then returned that, and I started the thread in Prime forums for users who Asus lost our first mailed GPS dongles)- your fooling yourself or you got a N10 with a bad screen
[Nexus 10 General] blackhand1001:
You can most likely blame that on googles new font rendering in 4.2. They turned down the font hinting a lot. It would be nice if it was configureable like in Linux. It the same way on the galaxy nexus and nexus 7 in 4.2.
[Nexus 10 General] Straf:
The problem with this screen is calibration and black levels.

Colors are extremely washed, red is a poor red, same with blue. This totally kills the screen. If you compare this with ipad screen, you will cry. Not because of viewing angles, not because of brightness, because of colours. Google was really smart when they decided not to calibrate their screens, same with nexus 4, while other OEMs take care of this thing deeply.

And black, despite numbers of the reviews, its quite poor, mostly because every single unit has light bleed (some with a hard mess, others this problem is smaller)

As a result, a top screen with such a poor implementation. This could be best screen in an tablet ever, and now it is a mediocre one, with many pixels, but nothing else. And it's a ****ing software issue, thats so sad.
[Nexus 10 General] Techie2012:
light bleed is not a software issue
[Nexus 10 General] Straf:
Yep, meant the calibration thing, it's about software. Black thing is because a bad manufacturing process, probably because of low price tag., or crappy manufacturers.
[Nexus 10 General] suzook:
Wow...that blows. Maybe we need a 4.1 ROM??