[Asus Transformer TF700] KhalelTheLegend:
Tablet Comparison / Usage Analysis

Microsoft Surface RT

32 GB = $590

64 GB = $699

Touch Cover = $142

OS = Windows (RT)

Dimensions = 274.6 x 172 x 9.4 mm (10.81 x 6.77 x 0.37 in)

Weight = 680.4 g (1.50 lb)

Display = 10.60 "/ 1366 x 768 pixels / 148 ppi / TFT capacitive touchscreen

Processor = NVIDIA Tegra 3 T30 @1.3GHz ARM Cortex-A9

GPU = ULP GeForce @ 520MHz

Memory = 2GB RAM

Storage = 32/64 GB

Camera = Front - 1.2MP,

Rear - 1.2 MP

Video Recording @720p@30fps

Battery Life Expectancy = standard battery, Li-Ion (31.5 Wh) Up to 8 h

Although it has some impressive quantitative hardware components and qualitative software features, I would say the Surface is too early in development, so to speak, to consider it a contender at its current configuration and feature set. There are currently not enough apps supporting this new OS and interface. The new environment may also be a turn off because of the learning curve involved in championing such a new piece of equipment. I expect Microsoft to be competitive in this field in the very near future despite the fact that the company is still establishing itself in this market. As a mobile laptop replacement this device is an option. It has a detachable keyboard option that connects directly to the tablet as well as a Built-in kickstand for easily positioning the device while working or enjoying videos.

Resources:

http://www.microsoft.com/Surface/en...//www.gsmarena.com/microsoft_surface-5082.php

http://www.phonearena.com/phones/Microsoft-Surface-RT_id7181

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgEabHck3Gg - Surface VS. iPad VS. Nexus 10

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vmxqm8Qii-E - Review

Apple iPad 4

16 GB = $499

32 GB = $599

64 GB = $699

(Cellular Service enabled models also available for additional cost)

OS = Apple IOS 6

Dimensions = 274.6 x 172 x 9.4 mm (10.81 x 6.77 x 0.37 in)

Weight = 680.4 g (1.50 lb)

Display = 9.70 "/ 2048-by-1536 / 264ppi / LED-backlit IPS - Retina Display

Processor = Dual-core Apple A6X @1.4 GHz

Memory = 1GB RAM

Storage = 16/32/64 GB

Camera = Front - 5 MP, 2592 x 1944 pixels,

Rear - 1.2 MP

Video Recording @1080p@30fps

Battery Life Expectancy =

Standard battery, Li-Po 11,560 mAh (42.5 Wh) Up to 10 h

The iPad is an extremely popular device that is very well integrated with the Apple IOS and the "user-friendly" Apple eco system. Combine that with the fact there are hundeds of thousands of third party application and hardware developments that enhance this devices experience and you have a very compelling piece of equipment. It is evident though that the market for this device can be very appealing to some but may not accommodate the technological desires of individuals (other than apple developers) who wish to have the freedom to customize, control, and expand with their device beyond what is proprietary to apple. In the realm of marketing, the strategy that Apple employs is brilliant in regard to its devices and proprietary components. This trend is detrimental to consumerism though. One major drawback to the iPad is the price tag one must pay to own such a premier device. For that same price, you can buy a device such as the Nexus 10 that has twice the storage at that price point and arguably better hardware/software features in many areas.

Resources:

http://www.apple.com/ipad/overview/http://www.gsmarena.com/apple_ipad_4_wi_fi-5072.php

http://www.phonearena.com/phones/Apple-iPad-4_id7547 - Review

Conclusions:

Between the three with true HD display (iPad, TF700, Nexus), one has to question how noticeable the difference actually is in casual viewing experiences. Without close scrutiny, it is difficult to notice enough of a difference to eliminate any of the three due to display quality. The law of diminishing returns comes to mind when comparing the viewing experience between them.

It is worth noting that the iPad generally received slightly better reviews in the realm of graphics and on screen image quality.

Also the Surface was dismissed from competition during the weigh-ins when it comes to display.

It is my determination that the iPad falls short because it lacks the dynamic nature of other alternatives while being more expensive, less compatible to other Eco-systems, and at times inferior in the realm of software/hardware features. I will add though that there is something to be said for the stability of the iPad and the IOS integration. Probably the smoothest overall graphical user interface experience among this group of devices.

While being a prospective future pioneer in the tablet market, the surface falls short in my eyes ddue to lack of apps, ancient display, and no real appeal currently other than the Windows OS that has yet to be proven on a tablet. Time will tell and I am interested to see the business and enterprise implications of a portable tablet windows environment.

I think the Nexus 10 does win out Spec for Spec, however in terms of functionality, the TF700 may have a slight competitive edge because of the dock and additional ports. The cameras on the Infinity are also the best among the mentioned tablets.

There are other topics of consideration not covered here such as Bluetooth 4.0 compatibility and included / native software. None should be deal makers or breakers in any direction but please feel free to recommend improvements/corrections to this comparison.