yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II General] jgcaap:
Thanks. Do I need a different type of kernel? Or has to be compatible?

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II General] 70x7:
See this:

http://changelog.bbqdroid.org/#/i9100/1371541253

All newer versions side by side.
[Galaxy S II General] Listy2021:
That's highly unlikely; the use fimg code wasn't implemented/turned on until the build on the 16th! I'm running the 14th build and my icons are back to normal (in fact the build from the 15th would be fine too)
[Galaxy S II General] mrvtec69:
from what ive seen if you leave the phone enough the phone fixes itself with the jagged edges, i had 6/17 nightly had the fuzzy icons, went to bed and all the icons for smooth :/ lol
[Galaxy S II General] lowrider82:
I confirm latest ok version is 14/06.

Just reverted back to it and all looks ok again. Comparison below between 14 and 18.

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II General] jgcaap:
Isn't it the same?

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II General] kalpik:
I know about the temp CWM zip, but I am pretty sure that wouldn't flash on the stock recovery too because of samsung checking for it's own signatures.
[Galaxy S II General] Listy2021:
EDIT: Ignore
[Galaxy S II General] lowrider82:
It is not. Look better.. Check google's g, Yahoo arrow, menu button at bottom center, tapatalk icon.. You can clearly see how jaggy they are. Colors are also looking washed out in some parts more than others.

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II General] -Grift-:
It works :) that's what the cwm was made for, to be flashed in stock recovery. Trust me it works.
[Galaxy S II General] thachphongphong:
why BBQLog dont's say anything about this icon problem?

I jumped from 0610->0617 and issue happened.:rolleyes:
[Galaxy S II General] kalpik:
That used to work on the old 2e Samsung recovery. Doesn't work on the new 3e recoveries. Tried and tested. Anyway, this is offtopic. No point discussing :)
[Galaxy S II General] thorazine74:
If it really gives itself after some time maybe there is some issue with bitmaps being cached somewhere and not being valid for the new 2d library, deleting that bitmap cache will help, but I don't know where is located

Enviado desde un teléfono Android | Posted from an Android smartphone
[Galaxy S II General] 4info:
about cm-10.1-20130618-EXPERIMENTAL-i9100-GERRIT44413, whats the different to the last nightly? - can't find anything about in this forum!
[Galaxy S II General] 99x:
Glad you managed to find it, I'm sure you realised but you can drill down in to each folder with that app to see the relative disk usage of the contents
[Galaxy S II General] codeworkx:
sensor and modem interface changes.

trying to find the battery problem.
[Galaxy S II General] gvala:
Latest experimental has better battery performance. During the night battery dropped ~1% per hour. With latest nightlies it was dropping ~1,5%.

With older nightlies it was about 0,5 - 0,7%.
[Galaxy S II General] mrvtec69:
[MENTION=3208754]codeworkx[/MENTION] is the cause of jagged lines around icons,images in the ui to do with the new fimg acelleration?? its affecting apps aswell but some how fixes it self sometimes after a certain amount of time :/
[Galaxy S II General] FredC94:
This ^^
[Galaxy S II General] kewinh0727:
i have a little problem...

when when i copy files over to the external storage with mass storage after a while if i copy a big amount of GB's my phone freezes and i have to restart it. why is that D:
[Galaxy S II General] chrhei:
[MENTION=3208754]codeworkx[/MENTION]: Anything useful in the log? Post #15502.
[Galaxy S II General] ferrocene:
I have the same problem. I'm guessing it can't read and write that much data to 2 sdcards at the same time. Maybe there's some buffer that gets corrupted. I have to copy to local hdd first.
[Galaxy S II General] gebazzz:
Is the new nightly (20130619) based on previous nightlies or on the experimental GERRIT44413 test build posted yesterday?
[Galaxy S II General] kalpik:
Based on previous nightlies. The changes from experimental GERRIT44413 test build haven't been merged yet.
[Galaxy S II General] LocutusEstBorg:
The entire OS is unstable and unreliable. It crashes under any kind of stress.
[Galaxy S II General] gebazzz:
Thank you kalpik.

So I'm going to test the experimental build.
[Galaxy S II General] 4info:
about cm-10.1-20130618-EXPERIMENTAL-i9100-GERRIT44413, just installed this morning. First look... very smooth an fast!. best performance of a cm 10.1 build ever!. to short to say anything about battery life.... we will see.
[Galaxy S II General] fepdzu:
Just tried the experimental build and oops cant mount my ext card...stock everything. cant restore a backup at the moment since its on my ext card.

anyone else come across this complication. i know a couple of days back some users had the same issue so let me search back and hope their solutions with apply to me as well.

the question to the guys who had this problem is this. after mounting their ext cards where they able to flash the 'culprit' build again and still have their sd card mounted?
[Galaxy S II General] d_Schizzo:
Did you even read the Commit?! There's nothing inside that increases "fastness" or "smoothness"...

So, the experimental is fast and smooth than any other build, but perhaps more batteryfriendly.
[Galaxy S II General] Kouett:
Mute your phone or disable the speaker before typing the codes.
[Galaxy S II General] jaydon1232:
Radio app

Can anyone please tell me which app i can use for radio.the one where u have to plug in the searphone,instead of using your internet data.thanks heaps
[Galaxy S II General] kokesh:
Spirit FM works I think.
[Galaxy S II General] 70x7:
Just back one page.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=42718082
[Galaxy S II General] deepongi:
Gerrit44413 as been merged, but not included in latest nightly.

Enviado do meu GT-I9100, usando o Tapatalk 2.
[Galaxy S II General] kalpik:
Not merged yet: http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/44413
[Galaxy S II General] deepongi:
http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/44413/

Nevermind... lol.. :D

Enviado do meu GT-I9100, usando o Tapatalk 2.
[Galaxy S II General] kalpik:
Sigh..
[Galaxy S II General] TheSaw:
What?? How?

Status: Review in Progress
[Galaxy S II General] dulcificum:
Can't find any other posts about it but just upgraded from CM9 to CM10.1 and no longer have "Reboot into recovery" even though reboot setting is on in System Settings.
[Galaxy S II General] oouaw:
Developer options - advanced reboot

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II General] 4info:
yes of course! but I stay to this. I feel more graphic power. for example I have some videos they doesn't bucking now. why??. also the boot time is shorter.
[Galaxy S II General] jpeg725:
I usually use adb to copy stuff, and I can assure you that several gigs copy over just fine. Dunno why it works better with that method.
[Galaxy S II General] tryptophane:
A little bit off-topic, but my first new feature contribution to cm has been merged today, should be in the next nightly :)

Camera: Add a GPS indicator

http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/38234/

For those of you who use cm on other devices than the s2, please PM me if something doesn't work/look like it should on them with this feature.

Here is a screenshot for disabled gps in system settings.
[Galaxy S II General] CRXed:
So far, so good!

Android-OS is not on top in the battery usage, which it was in latest previous nightlies....

Build feels very smooth too.
[Galaxy S II General] pxrave:
now android is after display feels better than before, need to play a bit with the phone to see if the battery is better but it should.
[Galaxy S II General] lucyphre:
[MENTION=5311695]Kouett[/MENTION]: sometimes it can be so easy! your recommendation works perfectly - have tried it out! thank you very much!

thank you all [MENTION=243864]xda[/MENTION]

pleasure to be in here

lucyphre
[Galaxy S II General] lammpat:
Is that icon smoothness is back? Anyone using latest nightly please confirm?
[Galaxy S II General] deepongi:
Thanks for that feature, it will come in handy. And welcome to the CM community | "family" .. :)
[Galaxy S II General] CRXed:
Nope, they haven't changed anything regarding the icons/2D
[Galaxy S II General] juanpirulo:
[MENTION=640797]codeworks[/MENTION] for me, battery now its going much better with the experimental. Cheers.
[Galaxy S II General] readon1:
Same for me! Battery is definitely better
[Galaxy S II General] kewinh0727:
the experimental changes are in the 19th build right ?
[Galaxy S II General] kolAflash:
Found a better workaround then reboot:

Settings => Launcher => Dock

Switch off "Hide icon labels" (German "Beschriftung nicht anzeigen") and after 1 second switch back on => Home button working again!

I think this restarts the launcher.

I used nightly 20130610 (on an i9100).

== now updating to nightly 20130619 ==

Seems to be fixed!!! Issue not reproduce-able anymore.
[Galaxy S II General] funkateer2:
12h , 2h33 screen on time and still 33% battery left. Really nicer for me. Good job.

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II General] deepongi:
no.
[Galaxy S II General] juanpirulo:
No changes are not merged yet. Codeworks is waitng for the results.Cheers
[Galaxy S II General] kewinh0727:
okey i thught so hehe but well...

if im on the experimental build .. can i safely flash the 19th build over it ? or should i make a full wipe? or if i dont want to go through all that should i

just skip flashing experminetal builds ^^ ?
[Galaxy S II General] deepongi:
thats up to you mate. people are testing battery life with the experimental build. if you wanna try it, and also give feedback, go ahead. if not you can flash "todays-nightly". and yes, you can flash "todays-nightly" on top of the experimental build.

regards.
[Galaxy S II General] M_T_M:
Por favor, pare de postar em qualquer outra língua que não o Inglês. Siga as regras ou sofrer as conseqüências.

Este será o único e último aviso ...

Please stop posting on any other language than English. Follow the rules or suffer the consequences.

This will be the only and last warning...got it?

Cheers,

Muito obrigado!
[Galaxy S II General] kewinh0727:
okey thanks :) ! for good answers
[Galaxy S II General] FredC94:
Flashed yesterday evening.

Regarding the battery drain, pretty better results in stand by mode and/or flight mode. 1% -> 0.6% per hour

However, maybe I'm wrong, but I'm still thinking that RIL is draining lot of battery during phone calls (with very good reception)...anyway much more than some previous nightlies (a month ago).

1 hour of phone calls, 1 hour of displaying -> 46% left

Keep it up :good:

---

great news, there's some moderators checking this thread
[Galaxy S II General] CRXed:
I was just forced to pull the battery, my phone had grinded to a halt.

First I noticed some apps opening slowly, then getting "not responding" apps and keyboard and finally it just froze.

Don't know it if is related to the Experimental build. but wanted to report it anyway.
[Galaxy S II General] juanpirulo:
GERRIT44413 merged for the next nightly.cheers.
[Galaxy S II General] CRXed:
Yup. Let's hope my problem was not related.
[Galaxy S II General] readon1:
I guess it is related. I also had the same experience with experimental build. When using the phone the screen suddenly froze on me and I had to reboot. Unfortunately I wasn't able to get the logcat/last_kmsg, because I was at work
[Galaxy S II General] chrhei:
20130618-experimental works very well as I can tell you after 24 hours. Battery is at last as good as all other releases. Can't proof it but the radio/modem seems to work better.
[Galaxy S II General] kewinh0727:
off topic

but if i flash the ROMNUKE v2.12

will that run

kernel wipe

rom clean

media wipe all at once? (in one flash) ? so that i don't have to flash them three first and then romnuke, cus i always flash the scripts in this order

1media wipe

2kernel wipe

3rom clean

4rom nuke

(the other forum is really slow at answering xD)
[Galaxy S II General] 70x7:
If I understood correctly the rules, i can post in other languages since I post the English translation.

In [MENTION=335322]MikeChannon[/MENTION] words:

"You're free to include your original message in your own language below the English translation.".

http://xdaforums.com/announcement.php?a=0

How I don't made a literal translation, I accept it. I know you are trying to make the forum best.

Hugs.

Abraços.
[Galaxy S II General] dioon:
for 18/06/13 or 19/06/2013?
[Galaxy S II General] deepongi:
none of those. 200613 nightly maybe ... theres still nothing in the changelog.

regards.
[Galaxy S II General] Strokesws:
Any solution for icons problem? I'm in 20130615 build.
[Galaxy S II General] CRXed:
The NEXT....means 20th

---------- Post added at 09:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:55 PM ----------

Nope
[Galaxy S II General] 70x7:
The GERRIT44413 status changed to "merged".

http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/44413/
[Galaxy S II General] kewinh0727:
sometimes when i flash cm 10.1 i get 791 mb of ram and sometimes i get 790 mb of ram.. why is that :eek: ?
[Galaxy S II General] drevel123:
Hi,

I have a problem: whenever the sound becomes silent, it mutes completely. Is this a bug or is it a feature of Jellybean? This problem occurs in all roms based on JB 4.2.2.

This makes phone conversations nearly impossible.
[Galaxy S II General] Rick Roll:
Here's a repo sync with fimg disabled (no glitchy icons):

https://mega.co.nz/#!AE0glIga!HELZFRL5tr6_Lo-2CGutvypzL6gbdPTrtY4PSymaDWM

REVERTED: http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/44296/
[Galaxy S II General] deepongi:
yeah, yeah .. i've seen that at 6 o'clock PM .. not news to me ...

http://changelog.bbqdroid.org/#/i9100/next

http://10.1.cmxlog.com/?device=i9100

until it's there on those two changelogs, its not official, or even if applied in next i9100 nightly .. :)

regards.
[Galaxy S II General] CRXed:
Wrong.

It's merged into the cm10.1 branch so it will be included when the next nightly is built.

Changelogs just try to read the changes of gerrit/github, sometimes they miss stuff, thats why cmxlog and bbqdroid are not showing the same changes all the time

Also, it's not just for the i9100, but for smdk4412, which is used for other devices too. That's why it's not showing up in the links you posted.
[Galaxy S II General] pepepapa82:
Battery?

Hi,

I have 10.1-20130614 nightly

with kernel: 3.0.64-CM

I was with ICS before this nighlty and I've seen a downgrade in the battery life.

in one of my *Typical* days I get home with enough battery, now I arrive with 3% :P or need to charge at the office.

According to "battery stats plus" it has an avg of 10h 30m

now, I've seen that in this thread you're talking about experimental build from 18th improving this?

does the 19th nightly contain the improvement too?

I know it depends on every usage profile, so.. anybody compared his usage and got improved? like in a good jump?.

thanks

cheers!
[Galaxy S II General] deepongi:
ok, thanks... so we have to go always to gerrit code review to check the changes made?

doesn't make much sense, sorry.

---------- Post added at 10:25 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:23 PM ----------

thanks for the info. i'll wait until 1 am to repo sync, and build.
[Galaxy S II General] 4info:
+1 the same here!
[Galaxy S II General] deepongi:
guys, that depends on the changes made, mostly to the kernel, if i'm not mistaken..
[Galaxy S II General] CRXed:
Not in the 19th build, tomorrow in the 20th build.

It's not a big jump, but it seems better.
[Galaxy S II General] deepongi:
why? aren't we using the code from smdk4412 kernel? so it should show up on the i9100 changelogs...

i find it strange, not to show up on both logs, but if you say thats the way it is, i'm not going to debate any longer.

maybe a sync time lapse between gerrit and the changelogs, because at the time of the build, all changes shows on both logs.

regards.. :)
[Galaxy S II General] rotemakerman:
I tried to flash official 1612 over mcm 1612 and got stock on boot logo (cyanogen spinner)

So came back to 1612 mcm for now

Can anyone tell me the difference between 1612 official and 1612 unofficial?

Sent from my GT-I9100 CM10 latest nightly
[Galaxy S II General] alex1007:
official -> 4.1.2 -> CM 10

unofficial -> 4.2.1 -> CM 10.1
[Galaxy S II General] codeworkx:
so, just for info.

i give a **** about custom kernels, i give a **** about flash which has no official support from adobe itself anymore and i give a **** about kang builds.

this thread is for pure stock cm. everything else shouldn't be discussed in this thread.

POINT.
[Galaxy S II General] petedaddi:
No thanks needed for the edit.

Great job your doing, ignore the ignorant.
[Galaxy S II General] Coirpre:
You are right. And as you can see, flashing CM 10.1 on top of CM 10 dos work pretty well except for the fact that you don't get support, whereas CM 10 on top of CM 10.1 is a bad idea.
[Galaxy S II General] Mark ter Grote:
Finaly someone said it...

And for all you %€#@&%?/ out there thnx for pissing off our master CODEWORKX idiots....
[Galaxy S II General] Unexist6969:
He isn't mad cuz he doesn't give a **** ;)
[Galaxy S II General] nozdormu:
+1
[Galaxy S II General] skymera:
And now you may climb out of his ass.

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Forum Runner
[Galaxy S II General] bhanupratap:
+1
[Galaxy S II General] FlashNchips:
Even if I have low count post numbers, but I've been playing with my phone a lot.

I followed the instructions and ended up with a formated external sd. I won't be lazy anymore, believe me :cool:
[Galaxy S II General] Spyr0s:
It's not formatted, check under /storage/sdcard1
[Galaxy S II General] mp1806:
do i just flash new gapps over previous without wiping?
[Galaxy S II General] Rildiz:
Yes, yes you do.
[Galaxy S II General] FlashNchips:
It was formatted, I double checked with a card reader.
[Galaxy S II General] manulemaboul:
I'd like to know, how did you ended to format your external SDcard while flashing a ROM :confused:
[Galaxy S II General] hyp3rstrike:
Crap, I just realized I posted in the wrong thread. Sorry guys.
[Galaxy S II General] manulemaboul:
It's super easy and simple: If you don't flash a custom kernel after flashing the ROM, then you got the stock CM kernel ;).
[Galaxy S II General] hyp3rstrike:
Aha! I figured that may have been the case, but I wanted to make sure. Cheers mate.
[Galaxy S II General] SuperKrog:
Hi, sorry maybe it was asked, I read the last pages but still the thing is not clear to me... clicking on nightly builds I see only cm10 and not cm10.1...
[Galaxy S II General] kewinh0727:
okey heh well it happens when i flash the same build also but never mind :) not that big deal cus when i rebooted and out my sim in it got to 791 xd so nvm :)
[Galaxy S II General] filllob:
the changes made in our device source tree brought some missings in the changelogs, i.e. if the changelog server searches the gerrit code review merged page to find the changes to our kernel, it will search for smdk4210 because that's the kernel that was used untill devs decided to unify the exynos 4 devices under one kernel tree, obviously it won't find anything because now our kernel is smdk4412, that search system is good for devices with aosp or similar conditions because in that case there no need to try different configurations or source trees to have a better system.

my point is, the changelogs sometimes miss something beacause of all the changes made by the devs to have a better ROM needed because of the lack of sources from samsung:

logs not working properly? blame samsung
[Galaxy S II General] deepongi:
now i have a proper answer.

thank you!

regards.
[Galaxy S II General] Rated RR:
The snapshot above (your post) was taken over 2013-06-14, so you can see for yourself.

---------- Post added at 12:39 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:38 AM ----------

Cool - I should now try to put it under my pillow, thanks for the advice :good:
[Galaxy S II General] 70x7:
Now I can say the battery in experimental build is better: 22h40 with 3h screen on.
[Galaxy S II General] Karpfenhai:
Thx, did you noticed the icon mess in this built?

Tapatalked from my Galaxy SII
[Galaxy S II General] kewinh0727:
having some problems with googleplay store

on wifi ever internet app works but not google playstore.

EDIT: solved the problem
[Galaxy S II General] lowrider82:
Is there plan to fix icons issue in next releases?

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II General] 70x7:
The icons issue isn't solved in this build. I'm using Nova Launcher.
[Galaxy S II General] SimboXXX:
Are you going to ask the same question every day?
[Galaxy S II General] e195aea:
lol
[Galaxy S II General] arendmogadi:
\m/ cyanogenmod Rawks and Hawts!!

Just wanna say that, thx to all the people that already participate to make this ROM happens. You guys are all awesome :D cheers + toasts!
[Galaxy S II General] lowrider82:
Latest experimental does seem to improve on battery life. I'm getting able 1 hour more of use

Sent from my GT-I9100
[Galaxy S II General] 4info:
+1, at least the effects are not significantly.
[Galaxy S II General] highdiver_2000:
Strangely the radio resolved itself after about an hour. I continued using it till today. RIL locked and going airplane mode did not clear it up.

Attached is the log from adb logcat radio
[Galaxy S II General] kalpik:
I've compiled a build with the fimg commit reverted. So people who are having crappy icons with the CM builds from 15th June onwards can try it.

- Reverted fimg commit. No more jagged icons and text.

- Includes the latest kernel changes from the last experimental build.

- As always, Linaro compiled. Smoother and better battery life for me ;)

Link: https://copy.com/Iv32LcgxBlfK

MD5: 83a26cfba997f69fb5c9255aca77a51c

Don't use any 3rd party kernel with this build, else that will negate all the kernel changes.

In case you want to stick to these builds, the link is in my signature. All future builds will also have fimg disabled.

EDIT: Oops! Somehow the fimg commit crept in today's build! I'm building again. In the mean time, you can use yesterday's build which has fimg disabled for sure: https://copy.com/SKhAkS2Y72hT
[Galaxy S II General] deepongi:
when did you do the repo sync or init? github is down. if you did a fresh sync, not long ago, i'll use your build.

EDIT: nevermind... https://status.github.com/

its back up again.
[Galaxy S II General] kalpik:
I can sync to guthub just fine. Will upload new build in about 1.5 hours.
[Galaxy S II General] dox81:
So if I use, for example, Dorimanx kernel or Kangbang, the fimg commit will or will not be reverted?

Thank you.
[Galaxy S II General] deepongi:
i have to go to work in a few minutes. can't wait that long. my build is compiling, lets see if theres enough time.

thanks.
[Galaxy S II General] kalpik:
FIMG will still be reverted with 3rd party kernels. You just won't get the benefits of the newer kernel changes, till the 3rd party kernel devs update their kernels :)

---------- Post added at 12:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:31 PM ----------

You can use my build, it has all the latest changes, just that FIMG is still enabled. The one I'll upload in about an hour will have FIMG disabled.
[Galaxy S II General] deepongi:
at what time did you synced up yesterdays build? the one with FIMG disabled.

can you apply turbo-mode-speed-on to your upload speed?! :D
[Galaxy S II General] kalpik:
ro.build.date=Wed Jun 19 21:17:17 IST 2013

And upload speed is fine, but it takes 1.5 hours to compile :p
[Galaxy S II General] markjamezmark:
Icon problem

after installing from build 19 to this unofficial 20., i still have a crappy icons.. it doesnt fix the problem..

hopefully on build 21, it will be ok..
[Galaxy S II General] binaryfalcon:
I'm currently experiencing some issues on latest nightly. Some of the icons have really bad quality. Anyone know how to fix this?

(Drawer button, Google settings, power amp) posted screens.
[Galaxy S II General] kalpik:
Yup. I edited my post. My fault. Uploading new build in a few minutes. That will be fine.
[Galaxy S II General] markjamezmark:
Thanks..

Thanks. Good news for the users of build 16 to 19.. :victory:
[Galaxy S II General] d_Schizzo:
You should read the last few pages before posting.

Use the nightly from 130614 till the problem is fixed.
[Galaxy S II General] kalpik:
Build failed :(

Another 1.5 hours :'(