yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S III General] bloot:
I can only say I bought them three or four years ago for 15€ or so, and I don't feel the need for replacing them yet, awesome value for money.
[Galaxy S III General] Erahgon:
I have a pair of E30 ones. They're really awesome, and comfortable for me!

Unfortunately, one of the ears' wires has a loose contact now. So I have reservations about build quality.

Sent from the present, which is now in the past.
[Galaxy S III General] Dani33:
this rom is awesome but the problem of camera is really boring.. is possible to install the stock samsung cam?
[Galaxy S III General] codeworkx:
yep. flash stock rom via odin. ;)
[Galaxy S III General] Slims34:
How is the Battery Drain ?
[Galaxy S III General] LenAsh:
Horrific - stay where you are. Battery lasts about 2 minutes. You deserve TW
[Galaxy S III General] scoobyjenkins:
May vary, depending on your setup but for me has been excellent recently.

Vote for i9300 support in next cm version: http://xplod.fr/poll/

Current phone: i9300, Rom: CM10.1

Tablet: Acer A700, Rom: CM10.1

Previous devices: HTC Desire HD, CM9

"Across the dancefloor he did scoot, the skinny sweaty man in a green suit."

Tapatalked that shiznit.
[Galaxy S III General] lukaaa47:
3h screen on, disaster
[Galaxy S III General] Julianocas:
Strange red marks shooting at night...
[Galaxy S III General] ss2i9100g:
Mind telling us your opinion on HTC one so far ? Thanks :thumbup:
[Galaxy S III General] scoffyburito:
Mass hysteria!
[Galaxy S III General] eriquee:
Anyone else has their mobile signal not showing up? ( the bars that show your signal) Mine is like it would be if you had no signal.

I tried calling my home phone, and it worked, but i dont think the mobile data is working well.

I did a fresh install with a full wipe.

In CM10 it worked fine.
[Galaxy S III General] omega_:
It could jolly well mean that the signal is weak. I often get this when I'm using WiFi
[Galaxy S III General] sadonlyone:
[MENTION=5259097]eriquee[/MENTION]

Yes, I'm back in "no signal" issue on latest nightly, me too.
[Galaxy S III General] Rick O:
Latest nightly data and phone working as it should.
[Galaxy S III General] sadonlyone:
not for me. and everything is flashed by the book. strange thing, though, is that unofficial build works...

this make me think: to get a working samsung phone is like wining lottery.
[Galaxy S III General] sachilleas:
So we shouldn't ask such questions? It's scary how many people thanked you. Instead of being ironic try to help and explain people what is in your mind.

The funny thing is that there is a battery drain in CM. The devs do excellent work and that's why I use CM, but there is a drain.
[Galaxy S III General] LenAsh:
More like shouldn't ask the same damn question every other page and spam what is a development thread. Read the rules and ask questions in the appropriate place. And try really hard to search first.
[Galaxy S III General] sachilleas:
Search function shows results from past posts. CM 10.1 evolves so it is ok to ask every now and then such questions about how things are going (not every other page of course). Moreover battery drain has to do with development so it is a valid thread to ask such question.
[Galaxy S III General] zelendel:
Look battery drain has almost nothing to do with development. There are too many things that can effect it outside of the rom. Your carrier can be having issues that would cause your battery to drain, An app you are using that is acting up can lead to battery drain. See the point.
[Galaxy S III General] LenAsh:
One of my unofficial builds? If so, which one? Reason for asking is that although I unshared them, due to nightlies coming back on stream, several people have asked for them..
[Galaxy S III General] sachilleas:
I lose 10% in 8 hours when the phone is in airplane mode in CM 10.1 , while In custom Stock Roms I lose 0% with the same apps and settings.

What does this mean? I don't thing it's the apps or the carrier because they are excactly the same in both cases.

CM 10.1 is excellent I don't want to say that it is bad, especially if we take into account the lack of sources. Thanks once again the devs for their great work.
[Galaxy S III General] zelendel:
You have to take into account that they are codded completely differently and will react differently. Your apps and settings will react differently with different coding. This is well known.

Comparing the 2 is really pointless.
[Galaxy S III General] lcrponte:
What have you tried to do so far to solve your problem?
[Galaxy S III General] scoobyjenkins:
I too notice the data/ signal bars are often very low when Wi-Fi is on. I can still make calls fine and once I'm away from my Wi-Fi, it goes right back up.

Vote for i9300 support in next cm version: http://xplod.fr/poll/

Current phone: i9300, Rom: CM10.1

Tablet: Acer A700, Rom: CM10.1

Previous devices: HTC Desire HD, CM9

"Across the dancefloor he did scoot, the skinny sweaty man in a green suit."

Tapatalked that shiznit.

---------- Post added at 10:16 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:10 AM ----------

I've found all unofficial builds you posted here to be great for battery, though I've not long been on 20130510 official build to compare, plus I use Greenify and keep location, Google Now etc. off so battery has been better for me lately anyway. But I think I detected an improvement when on the unofficial builds, thanks!

Vote for i9300 support in next cm version: http://xplod.fr/poll/

Current phone: i9300, Rom: CM10.1

Tablet: Acer A700, Rom: CM10.1

Previous devices: HTC Desire HD, CM9

"Across the dancefloor he did scoot, the skinny sweaty man in a green suit."

Tapatalked that shiznit.
[Galaxy S III General] Jeddix:
Could you please stop using a 10 line tapatalk signature? There is a reason why a forum has real signatures so we can turn them off. This is just anoying.
[Galaxy S III General] scoobyjenkins:
Is this better, sweetheart?

Vote for i9300 support in next cm version: http://xplod.fr/poll/

Tapatalked that shiznit.
[Galaxy S III General] FrancescoS:
Actually this is a "discussion thread" as the topic name says. isn't developer thread in another section or am i wrong?
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
Yes, this is a discussion thread for CM10.1. The development thread is in the original development section.
[Galaxy S III General] KrewsialNL:
Instead of asking questions...read up a little. Or actually try the ROM. Do you have any idea how many people just show up and ask questions without reading ANYTHING first?
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
But constantly telling them off is like telling weeds not to grow..
[Galaxy S III General] LenAsh:
It's also a thread for official nightlies as per the CURRENT title. So I should NOT add my occasional gap-filling-Jenkins-broken unofficial builds either... despite the good feedback.
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
You do as you wish.
[Galaxy S III General] g-m1n1:
How is the cam working in the latest nightlies? I switched to Omega rom (2-3 months back) because the cam freezed quite a lot. Has it been solved? Thanks in advance.
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
Shouldn't freeze now, if I understand the camera related gerrit merges correctly.
[Galaxy S III General] FIFATG:
Deleting/Disabling/Reinstalling gapps.zip, as well as searching the net for any help - but all the posts regard to one solution that didn't work with me.
[Galaxy S III General] bloot:
I'm afraid the only solution is the one you didn't wanted. At least I can't think of anything else, frankly.
[Galaxy S III General] FIFATG:
Thought so. Thanks anyway.
[Galaxy S III General] eriquee:
So anyone got any tips, on how to make the mobile signal come back up?

Install a previous 10.1 nightly version? I had the CM 10 before upgrade to this version of 10.1.
[Galaxy S III General] sadonlyone:
[MENTION=3830277]LenAsh[/MENTION]

unofficial that worked for me was..... NOT the last one (not 20130510) but the other before it, as I remember. I didn't tried 20130510.
[Galaxy S III General] KrewsialNL:
It's not freezing at all and working very well.
[Galaxy S III General] LenAsh:
Probably 0805

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_ESvfVtZzEwUWZ0dXdOUThjM3c/edit?usp=sharing

0905 is this one

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B_ESvfVtZzEwR25TSnpUeWVyb1E/edit?usp=sharing
[Galaxy S III General] sadonlyone:
yeah, I guess 0805. unfortunately, I don't remember exactly.

edited: wait a minute, I'll tell you exactly :)

re-edited:

this is ****ing annoying:

boot into cwm, all wipes (data, factory reset etc), flashed 0905 without gapps, reboot, signal strenght is very good, sound is loud (this is very good) and clear. reboot again, signal is lost, network unknown, mobile network type unknown, service state out of service. signal flashes and struggle to get into network but it fails.

0805 doesn't get signal after flash, at all. same struggle to get network but it fails too. reboot, but the same.

same thing on official cm-10.1-20130510-NIGHTLY-i9300

I'm using modem XXEMC2 (but really I saw already that is not what cause no signal at all at this moment), both unofficial shows correct IMEI, phone is made in Vietnam by Samsung, network Orange Romania, sim card changed. with or without original EFS same thing.

beat me but I understand ****.
[Galaxy S III General] ricnar456:
I am a new user of cyanogenmod

Sorry for my bad english

I have installed the previous nightly build

cm-10.1-20130507-NIGHTLY-i9300.zip

and the phone works perfect, but today there is a new nightly build

cm-10.1-20130510-NIGHTLY-i9300.zip

I download by ota and next click upgrade, the phone reboots and shows an error in very tiny red letters (i do not read well but is about of a not found path error) and only is possible reboot.

When the phone reboots, the previous version continues working perfect but no upgrades.

Is necesary make the upgrade from recovery in this case?

thanks for all

best regards

ricnar
[Galaxy S III General] sadonlyone:
[MENTION=4141827]ricnar456[/MENTION]

yeah, you should always use recovery way. it's safer this way.
[Galaxy S III General] LenAsh:
You're not flashing the modem with RIL are you?
[Galaxy S III General] sadonlyone:
of course not. modem is flashed from wanamlite 6.6 then I switched to cm10.1 without any ril or play store getril. list in /system/addon.d shows 70-gapps.sh and 71-gapps-facelock.sh

as I remember last good version for me was cm-10.1-20130504-NIGHTLY-i9300 or 0430, but again I'm not sure...
[Galaxy S III General] thegh0sts:
the get.cm site seems to be down.
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
http://isup.me/http://get.cm reports that it's down but it's up and perfectly accessible to me.
[Galaxy S III General] ricnar456:
I install from recovery and it was perfect, no problems.

thanks

ricnar
[Galaxy S III General] cammel:
Usa el TWRP y no vas a tener más ese problema con las actualizaciones ota. Vas a poder actualizar tranquilamente desde los ajustes de cyanogenmod, usando el actualizador de cyano sin tener que entrar manualmente al recovery.

Use TWRP and you will not have any more problems with ota updates using cyanogenmod updater. This way you won't have to manually reboot into recovery to manually install nightlys updates.
[Galaxy S III General] Moskyz:
Is better for Wifi if I flash first cyano 9.0 and after the 10.1 or no problems?

Inviato dal mio GT-I9300 con Tapatalk 2
[Galaxy S III General] MatheusCecato:
Somebody could tell me the actual bugs unfixed? :)
[Galaxy S III General] scoobyjenkins:
I always use cm updater to download but manually go into recovery to flash as letting cm updater do it once had me stuck in the flashing process with no option but to go into download mode, flash stock rom and reflash cm!

Vote for i9300 support in next cm version: http://xplod.fr/poll/

Tapatalked that shiznit.
[Galaxy S III General] ricnar456:
Sorry i do not know what is twrp but i will investigate.

Thanks
[Galaxy S III General] Mcalan:
Twrp is a system for your recovery. Like cwm.
[Galaxy S III General] Kickasskev:
I'm wanting to use this rom but all other aosp etc have crap cameras on them the picture quality is pants compared to stock, does any one know why? and is there a fix for it.

Also tried different camera apps from market with no joy
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
Short explanation: stay stock
[Galaxy S III General] Thealshear:
^that Amen
[Galaxy S III General] dpk3:
If u do want to customize a little and be stock. You can go miui. It's stock base and your able to customize the look. Pretty good alternative to Sammy stock
[Galaxy S III General] Zatta:
normal CWM, Philz CWM and TWRP, they all work perfectly with the cmupdater.

Bad luck, you should try it again, it is incredibly simple to update CyanogenMod. No need for wipes, tricks or scripts.

As I said, any recovery does the job.
[Galaxy S III General] scoobyjenkins:
I may have just been unlucky that time but I prefer to install manually to be on the safe side. I use Philz and find it to be excellent.

Vote for i9300 support in next cm version: http://xplod.fr/poll/

Tapatalked that shiznit.
[Galaxy S III General] Hrc4u:
finally my patiance have run out on samycrap not relaeasing necessary source for our beloved s3...so i thank all cm developers for the greatness you achieved! taking cm on this device! ....:) i'll moving on to the oppo find 5...if it´s anything near build quality as the blu ray players... this is the **** you should ALL GET! =)

cheers!/H
[Galaxy S III General] Zatta:
But but... ahh.

CU laters!
[Galaxy S III General] Kung-Fu-Tse:
cm10.1 is new for me (I know cm7 & cm9) but this is really nice :highfive: :angel:
[Galaxy S III General] leonardoroza:
What about oppo's sources and cm on it? I'm also looking for better alternatives regards cm support. :)
[Galaxy S III General] Hrc4u:
http://www.xda-developers.com/android/oppo-find-5-receiving-open-source-project-love/

And yeah..there is already cm official nightlys on the oppo :cool:

GT-i9300 CM10.1
[Galaxy S III General] MatheusCecato:
And about the bugs?
[Galaxy S III General] Millenium3:
Why isn't I9300 International Version not receiving RC versions of CM10.1 ? (Unlike US variants of S III)
[Galaxy S III General] Chief_Death:
Exynos..
[Galaxy S III General] oae08:
You can consider it an RC yourself. Pretty damn stable for me.
[Galaxy S III General] 9Lukas5:
The opensourceril in cm works best with the XXDLIB modem. Try it if that solves your problem ;)

L
[Galaxy S III General] sadonlyone:
[MENTION=3320665]9Lukas5[/MENTION]

I tried also XXDLIB modem, but no luck. Some old nightly builds worked with this modem indeed, but didn't worked for any may build. Further more, on some builds, if I left phone untouched for 20-30 minutes - network signal is finally received and it stays so until first reboot when signal is lost again and so on.

a horse, a horse, I'll give my kingdome for a horse.
[Galaxy S III General] LenAsh:
I now have the Xperia Z - Sony have embraced Open Source and the development community and it shows...

CM10.1 RC2 for the XZ is the dog's conkers and despite only a few weeks in work has overtaken the S3 (Exynos) in terms of full functionality. Codeworkx is part of the Free Xperia Team (as well as other coding giants like Andrew Dodd - Entropy512) and even he seems impressed by the Sony support. Which is nice.

I would also say the Oppo Find 5 is a fabulous phone, a friend has one, but availability in the UK is very limited (expensive import required). The other thing that made me avoid it was no FM Radio (which the S4 doesn't have either - stupid mistake), which is a must for me. I have an Oppo Blu-Ray player too - phenomenal machine even at the (high) price.
[Galaxy S III General] pickandwhammy:
What has happened to the Android keyboard? "I"s don't automatically capitalise anymore, and double space doesn't create a period.
[Galaxy S III General] TigerCourage:
Can you share the wallpaper?

Yesterday's nightly works like a charm dual booting with Googy Kernel. Much better compared to Siyah (Probably because zRam causes lag). I'm finally using the second ROM as default now.

People should stop talking about Oppo and other phones here...
[Galaxy S III General] LenAsh:
Discussion thread about CM10.1 - the question was about CM10.1 elsewhere so is relevant-ish.

This thread also requests that other kernels aren't discussed, so perhaps you need some intraspection before casting your view.
[Galaxy S III General] dhiru1602:
Tried changing the JPEG Quality in the settings to Super? That is the only thing that would affect the picture quality since the Camera Kernel driver and the Camera HAL used in CM are from the stock ROM itself (No sources).
[Galaxy S III General] Yank555:
Agreed !

People need to figure out, that they just have to use any third party camera app if they want a more feature rich camera app, picture quality is exactly the same !

I use ProCapture (it's a pay app), and I even used that when I was on Sammy ROMs, because it's way better in making panoramas without glitches like those you'd get on crappy Sammy camera app.

And I'm a hobby photographer, have been for over 20 years !

So please people, stop this nonsense about "bad image quality" !

All I can accept is "there are many less features".

I've removed stock camera app, as I didn't use it at all... (both on Sammy and CM ROMs btw)

JP.

BTW: Snap is also a pretty good alternative to stock CM camera app.

EDIT :

To prove my point look at both attachments !

The TouchCrap one is only a 3 pics pano, the ProCapture is a 5 or 6 !

The TouchCrap was obviously made on a Sammy ROM, the other was made on CM10.1 !
[Galaxy S III General] bloot:
Daylight is no problem, I also managed to get some beautiful pictures with light enough. But try to take a photo at night, it just can't be compared, although I agree it's a software thing most probably, samsung night mode is awesome btw.
[Galaxy S III General] Theshawty:
What does this change mean? http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/37370/
[Galaxy S III General] bloot:
I found this thread talking about it.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2268196
[Galaxy S III General] Yank555:
Sorry, but I've had no issues in bad light either...

Just don't compare a generic "AOSP" camera app to some device specific one. That app is supposed to fit the oldest slowest device running the OS up to the Nexus4, with everything that can come up in between...

If you want to compare it to anything, than to an evolved camera app, like ProCapture for instance, that's the one I use, but there are other available.

So again, their's no reason to say "CM10.1" has bad quality camera, the ROM has the same software access to the camera hardware as a Sammy ROM, just use a decent app that can make most the most out of it.

And believe me, the Sammy camera app is for from "the best". I kicked it off my S3 once I started using ProCapture.

It may be a "fancy all-rounder make many happy" kind of thing, but once you start really to be demanding (photo wise, not gimmick wise), you quickly bump into limitations. And I don't expect my S3 to be a Nikon D300 either, but just do what it should

without glitches

.

So if you want, Sammy app is better than the generic CM10.1 on, but far from good nor the best.

JP.

EDIT :

I dug this one out for you, in a wine cellar, so I guess light is really pretty bad in there... It's a panorama, so no HDR or low noise...
[Galaxy S III General] bloot:
Disagree on one thing: I think I can say cm stock camera has bad quality on bad light conditions, and it's not cm fault of course, because stock google camera (which is basically the same) is as terrible at night aswell. But this is the camera you get when flashing this rom, so you can tell how good or bad it is, don't find it offensive to CM in any way, becuase it's google source code after all.

The point is, no other camera app has a night mode as good as the samsung one, and that is what people notices the most, again not a cm fault, and no i am not going to flash a TW rom just because of this (nor because some games doesn't work properly), but is fair to say how things are, and I haven't found a camera that does good photos at night yet, frankly.

Will take a look at the app you pointed, and nice picture that one, definitely better than what I've achieved.
[Galaxy S III General] Yank555:
Exif are just meta-data embedded in an image giving details about how the picture was taken (from camera make and model to aperture and shutter speed, iso setting ... used).

It's just informational, but of course, bad if wrong as it won't help a photographer reviewing an image to find what he did wrong or could have done better taking the image.

So no impact on image quality.

JP.

PS: Wikipedia.

---------- Post added at 12:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:43 PM ----------

Honestly, never achived any better with Sammy app than with the one I use, nevermind the ROM.

I get your point, but my point is, CM10.1 comes with some things, and then there is Play Store that is there to enable you to customise your device to what you want. The launcher is also not the most feature rich, sow what, there are plenty other to use on Play Store.

All the reports about CM10.1 having bad image quality sounds like it's a ROM thing, and happening with whatever camera app would be used.

If you put it like you just did, and as I pointed it out earlier, the CAMERA APP coming with CM10.1 is feature-poor (as in like lack of decent night-mode), then it's fine, and adding to it, using third party camera apps this can be overcome, would even be better.

Because the short statement :

CM10.1 has bad camera image quality

will make users not even try CM10.1, and that's a pitty and also what's getting me upset, as they are missing out on something really excellent.

JP.
[Galaxy S III General] bloot:
I see what you mean, of course you can try other apps, say camera, say music player or whatever. ;)
[Galaxy S III General] melquisedec:
Hi, How Can I turned off the screen without TV efect???
[Galaxy S III General] Kung-Fu-Tse:
settings - display - User interface ;)
[Galaxy S III General] oae08:
Couldnt agree more! I getting wonderful pictures using Cm10.1 camera and i even compared the same shot of a valley taken from my s3 with cm10 1 and my friends iphone 5 and believe me my pic looks better and he even confessed that. Then i come to this thread and see some haters crying that image quality is so bad :/
[Galaxy S III General] 9Lukas5:
Hm, I never had such a problem. In the first build with the opensource RIL I opened GetRil and saw that getril identified it as XXDLIB so I uninstalled GetRil and flashed the XXDLIB Modem, deleted all scripts in /system/addon.d that kept any RIL/modem related files and flashed the nightly again. Since then never had any problem with my signal or the data connections.

L
[Galaxy S III General] andylams:
Thank YOU! :laugh:
[Galaxy S III General] android_master:
Great rom, very stable indeed, using it as a daily driver:laugh:

But whether directory bind on galaxy s3 works for CM 10.1 ie 4.2.1

Anyone tried it?
[Galaxy S III General] mdfpido:
Thanks Santa! :D
[Galaxy S III General] guerouig:
I can tell you that I'm using it as a daily ever since 13.12 and so far it's simply smashing. speed is incredible, butter effect has never been so good, the only bug I can report is chrome crashing and then again it may be chrome bug. It seems to me a nightly as it stands. hope to hear from codeworkX soon.
[Galaxy S III General] salvatore94:
I experienced some connection drops, especially using 3g data. Is a little bit annoying.

I read somewhere that could be related to the modem, so I would ask which is the best modem to use with this experimental rom?

PS: I noticed that using a 3rd part camera, such as CameraZoomFX, you can take photos also with flash on...

Sorry for my english
[Galaxy S III General] tontiv:
does the releases have a repository similar to get.cm for cm10?
[Galaxy S III General] guerouig:
Yes I did experience the same problem (not only with titanium, but also with busybox), for titanium had to uninstall and delete it, and then relaod; busybox managed to work itself out after a reboot. hope it helps you
[Galaxy S III General] kylesinho21:
Really for me theres is no bugs, without camera taking flash, the rom is perfect. Great job

Enviado desde mi Tamagotchi usando Tapatalk.