yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] chongns:
So, from noob like me to understand from the link your provided above, it mean no use to set under volt for TI chip since it will alter it anyway to fix its own criteria?

nice find, i must be blind to not see the slop pattern, it is same as the 1Ghz slop. so, under clock since no differences. will get almost same battery life and slow processor speed, it mean lagging. btw, i turn off google backup.

Any help u need from me noob? i use your kernel as daily use. which area or item need to monitor?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] loSconosciuto:
I'm not an expert, but what you say should be correct:

a calibration is done after each reboot and periodically at runtime (not so often). Voltages are changed to what should be the best in terms of stability and power.

You can probably "force" the CPU to use lower voltages, but I don't know how much (according to Huexxx's posts/tests not much) and more importantly if it worths it (I think not).

First of all I'd like to know for sure wheter the experimental sync bug [V2] is really working or not. I'm not having issues with it, so it should be fine, but more testers are needed.

I like this new fix because it works without changing kernel/power/wakelock.c and no additional wakelocks as the new Samsung fix.

EDIT: maybe sometimes 3G data get lost until the screen is turned on. All I have, for now, is a single line in my logs:

[ipc_spi] Got ONEDRAM_CMD_RESUME_REQ

I'll look into that when I'll find time, or maybe just go back to one of the other fixes.

If anyone else noticed that after the screen is turned on, there's no data (but still signal), just post it. It should happen only with the experimental sync bug (V2).

And I'm also interested in battery life. I'd like to know if it's better or equal, in terms of power used, to the other two fixes (the first one is used in V1 and in dhiru's kernel, the other is currently used only by XDA_Bam), but if there's a difference, you can probably notice it only if your phone is most of the time in idle syncing data.

If you get the same battery life when using the two kernels in the OP (V1 and V2), then it's a good thing.

EDIT:

maybe comparing the "awake time" and the "screen on" time can tell us what's better.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] ivAnash:
This question is completely off topic .. I didn't want to start a new thread for a simple question ,so I'm asking it here ..

Are there any negative effects in setting the min CPU frequency to 600 instead of 300 ,other than decreased battery life ...

I'm using cm9, and the interface is a little laggy and setting the min freq at 600 helps a lot...
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] chongns:
i try answer with my experaince in stock rom.

there is a time taken from the min Freq to deep sleep stage.

at that of waiting time the phone is at the min Freq stage. so in my opinion, nothing happened.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Fertz70:
Same case as jsp1984, installed slim bean3.1(cm10a4) over paranoidandroid(cm10a3), applied v2 of kernel and ubkpd modem, and everything worked like a charm.

Will report battery life after a couple of cycles....
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] loSconosciuto:
Not that I'm aware of.

Probably lags are due to a slow CPU freq ramp up. Try to adjust your governor, each governr provides some interfaces for tweaking purposes. They are located in

/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/NAMEGOVERNOR/

There are some apps you can use for this. NSTools is a nice one (made for the Nexus S, but it works great. Fix permissions from CWM if you can't change governor/tweak it) and if I'm not mistaken, SetCPU too let you tweak governors.

Try to increase freq_step (some info) and to decrease sampling_rate, if possible. If I remember correctly the minimum value allowed by this kernel is something like 150ms (quite high IMO).

If you are using ondemand, everything should be ok. Maybe decreasing up_threshold will make it even more reactive. sampling_rate here should be 30ms.

EDIT: I can't help you more, you need to find the correct values, we are using different ROMs. Maybe it won't help you that much.

Otherwise, keep using 600MHz as min freq and try to use an app to change the min freq from 600MHz to 300MHz when the screen is off.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] gauravojha:
wifi and phone

Just one question, after flashing to V2 kernel on my i9003 running cm10 alpha 4 (by dhiru), will both my WiFi and 2G phone signal start showing? (right now it shows 2G at times, and other times it doesnt. WiFi works but no signals shown.) :confused:
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] rodero95:
The WiFi signal is not a kernel problem but a problem with a binary blob. It has always been like that, since cm9.

WiFi works perfectly (adding the fake network) but doesn't show signal.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] erickkhhk:
I still on Samsung splash screen while using chongns recommened flahing procedure. poor me :(

Sent from my GT-I9003
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] xdagsl:
Signal fix kill the phone

I have the same problem. And i have try to flash RemICS-JB and the same thing happen stuck at the RemICS with two rotating geared! i think this problem with CM10 itself. But i am really interested to know what we have to check for IMEI and etc...as shown in the intsruction.:crying:
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vishal24387:
Wow...amazing work :) Just amazing 2% battery drop in deep sleep mode in 8 hrs :) I am feeling like I am totally on a stock rom :)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] spacebar2011:
Just tried the updated v2 zip again. Soft-brick! :rolleyes:

I manually checked /cache is mounted and /system too. Rebooted recovery just to be sure and no coconut! Stuck at Samsung screen.

EDIT: I'm kind of amazed this hasn't been resolved. Full clean install and it still doesn't work with the updated script!
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vishal24387:
Hey hi...:) Its nice to see ur your post in our forum after so many days :) I dont know why you are facing soft brick. I am using this kernel. Its amazing kernel.

Today I got nearly 17 hrs of battery backup with 4 hrs and 15 mins screen on time with still 32% battery backup remained :D So much amazing guys. I am feeling like I am on stock rom. I am expecting v3 with smartassv2 governer and new gpu driver of adi's kernel.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] spacebar2011:
Hey Vishal! Good to see you guys again.. :) I said goodbye to everybody in the i9003 forums when I moved to the GNex last year. You might remember.

I passed my SL to a cousin and I've through 3 different phones since. Updated his phone to CM10 A4 and then tried to flash this fix like 2 weeks ago. Same error happened back then and its the same now. Also tried Adi_pat's latest kernel and still the same. It just gets stuck at the first Galaxy S LCD screen.

Then I flashed the kernel as PDA on ODIN (many thanks to loSconosciuto for providing the tar files) and everything went fine, no errors. There's some issue in CWM and kernel zip updater scripts. I think everybody is using the same updater script for CM10 A4 kernels and hence the same issue with every kernel zip.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] rodero95:
Its strange, I flashed this kernel long ago and had no problems with it.

Also moved to Adi's kernel lately and no problems either.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] spacebar2011:
Most people haven't had problems with the kernel zips. But many others including me have had the device stuck at the first Galaxy S LCD screen for some odd reason. No amount of clean flashes and wipes seem to solve this.

As added to the OP, if you face this issue, do the following:

1 - Go back into Download mode and flash the tar as PDA. (Device will go past the first Galaxy S LCD screen but it'll be blank and won't boot any further.)

2 - You can now pull battery and reboot into recovery.

3 - Restore your nandroid (CM10 A4 of course).

4 - DO NOT REBOOT.

5 - Pull battery and go back into Download mode.

6 - Flash the tar as PDA again and device should boot successfully with fixed kernel in place. :good:

But, as always, YMMV.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] phong1781992:
I'm try to flash kernel to many time.But my kernel still is dihuri1602@ICS_CM9(CM10a4 stock kernel)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] loSconosciuto:
This happened because you flashed Adi_Pat's kernel, which comes with updated binaries and libraries (open his zip and see) required for the new graphic drivers not compatible with the older graphic drivers used in this kernel. That's why you got the blank screen.

CWM is not affected by this change and it will work.

When you restored your CWM backup, the older blob was restored and that's why the second flash with odin worked.

I forgot to mention this before. This kernel has the wrong name, you'll get dihuri1602@ICS_CM9 after flashing this, but it's for CM10, don't worry.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] kaboomkazoom:
How to go to kernel-cm-10-A4-signal_fix-exp without prior backups

I'm on CM10 A4 with Adi_Pat's v2 Siri kernel. I would like to go to kernel-cm-10-A4-signal_fix-exp but I DO NOT have the any nandroid backup. Is it possible to go to kernel-cm-10-A4-signal_fix-exp without clean wiped installation of CM10 Alpha4 (I do not want to reinstall all applications). Thanks.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] MR.Volkf:
NO. adi was mentioned in him thread(see latest post by adi)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] kaboomkazoom:
Reflashing Alpha 4

Thanks for the response. Would reflashing alpha 4 wipe my applications?

For reflashing alpha 4, do I need to do wipe anything other than Cache partition and Dalvik Cache partition?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] MR.Volkf:
I think yes,because you must wipe cache,dalvik cache,data, backup all aplication in Titanium Backup,and after installing the rom just restore :D
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] kaboomkazoom:
Thanks. Will give it a try and revert how it goes :)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] MR.Volkf:
okok Good luck friend :D
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] fraaz7777:
which of the following V2 did u actually flash ??????

•kernel-cm-10-A4-signal_fix-ODIN-exp.tar: experimental sync bug fix [0003, 0004] + signal fix [0001, 0002] - (previously known as V2)

OR

•kernel-cm-10-A4-signal_fix-exp.zip: experimental sync bug fix [0003, 0004] + signal fix [0001, 0002] - (previously known as V2)

Also, did u follow the normal flashing method of going into recovery, selecting zip, then flashing ??????????

pls help.............:(:(
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] erickkhhk:
still can't flash through recovery, but OK through odin, thx bro :D:D

Sent from my GT-I9003
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] spacebar2011:
Both versions have the same signal fix. Flash the tar as PDA through ODIN to be safe.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] kaboomkazoom:
This is what I did to revert to from Adi_Pat's v2 Siri kernel to kernel-cm-10-A4-signal_fix-exp (or any other kernel for that matter):

Reflash CM10 alpha 4

Flash the kernel kernel-cm-10-A4-signal_fix-exp

Reflash gapps

Clear Cache and Dalvik Cache

No need the wipe anything :)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vishal24387:
@ loSconosciuto

Hey buddy have u observed that touchscreen dont works in a normal way like it works on stock rom?? When we use any launcher on cm10a4 then while swiping our fingures over screens we can observe that homescreen or app drawer never changes smoothly. We have to swipe our fingures for a longer distance which is irritating. I have used many launchers. TSF launcher is a heavy launcher but its most butter smooth launcher. On stock I have to swipe my fingure for a very small distance but on cm10a4 it creates problems. Can u please look into it?? :)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] Sonoo:
Try JB 4.2 launcher. Its much better, but you loose the customization features.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vishal24387:
I have tried every launcher. I am 110% sure that its a touchscreen issue. I talked with Adi. He confirmed it.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] loSconosciuto:
Maybe your problem is somewhat related to the changes Google introduced with ICS/Honeycomb (here there are some commits, like: Changes to scrolling physics. I think this has nothing to do with you problem, but proves that Google changed something.)

The way things scroll changed, it's like there's more friction and less inertia now. In my opinion it's now more realistic and I like it.

There were no changes in the touchscreen driver.

It's also possible that Samsung changed something in our Gingerbread ROMs I don't know. They do a lot of changes, TouchWiz is not just a launcher.

Opera Mobile somehow reminds me how GB scrolling was. Small finger movement => everlasting scroll.

EDIT: Maybe you can ask TSF launcher devs to add an option to make things as you like, it's something they can do. As of now I don't know where to look at for your "problem".
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] chongns:
hi IoSco, it is not a problem, but vishal is correct. the user experience on scrolling is less smooth. meybe there are some value in kernel or config file canbe adjucted to reduce the friction needed to trickle the longer scrolling?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] MR.Volkf:
Problem is when recording after 48 second,camera and gallery force close
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vishal24387:
I think u misunderstood my ptoblem :) I am not talking about scrolling problem. I am talking about changing homescreens when we swipe on screen from left to tight or vice versa. Like I already said its not a launcher ptoblem. Swiping should be done in such a smooth way that for a little swipe the homescreen or app drawer should change quickly. On stock its really smooth but on cm10 we have to swipe for a longer distance.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] loSconosciuto:
I got your point, I didn't explain mine well enough.

Our CyanogenMod ROMs use mostly the same kernel you can find in our GB ROMs, that means the kernel is sending input events in the same way it did.

What is now different is how Android interprets those input events and this is obvious while scrolling.

Some Nexus S users complained about the sticky scrolling when they updgraded to ICS and I guess the changes Google did are related to the longer gesture you have to do in ICS/JB. What you do when you change screen/page in your launcher is basically an horizontal scroll.

I'm not sure of this, I didn't analyse the code, I just quickly went through some git commits and saw that there were several changes.

All I know is that our touchscreen is working in the same way it did, so it shouldn't be a kernel issue.

Anyway, I'm currently busy and I don't have time to look into that, but if I'll find something, I'll let you know.

PS: I did a comparison with a the Nexus S: same experience. Sticky scrolling and same swipe gesture required to change drawer page.

You can do something to change things (see this), but I doubt you can do much with no changes in the framework.

I don't know what to say: I never recorded a video, I'm not using any of the kernels in this thread and I'm on a different CM build.

In any case this kernel is exactly like dhiru's except for a line I removed to catch the signal. Nothing else was changed.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vishal24387:
Hey i tried this mod. surprisingly it worked for me :D It removed 90% of swiping problem. Now I have super smooth scrolling :)

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2036441
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] ivAnash:
Are u talking abt the mod by Topdroid or the one posted by Lolation.....

If it is the one posted by Lolation, can u upload the modded framework.jar...
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vishal24387:
Just download the file posted by topdroid in OP. Just replace manually framework.jar and fix permission :)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] androman1507:
I think the problem u r telling is due to h/w composer not working. Bcoz I find same problem in almost all launchers. Is it possible that launcher works on h/w acceleration? I may be wrong ,too.

U should try apex launcher. I always find it smoother. I don't know about this kernel as I m using crakazier kernel.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] vishal24387:
You are right. But I think scrolling response also somewhat depend on launcher also. You can try go launcher and tsf launcher. Their swiping is very much smoother.

Anyway topdroid's mod solved this problem upto 90% :)
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] SrijitC:
Sir, I can't thank you enough. I installed slim bean 3.1 and was stuck at RILJ wakelocks. this helped me to get rid of it.
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] H.burns:
i can call out but cannot receive calls, it that i have to go back stock and go to A4 again?
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] YogiBear007:
Yep... It worked for me... Signal reception is good and no lag in strength after flashing the V1...
[Samsung Galaxy SL i9003] hemantkarandikar:
Signal drop, poor signal after hardware reset (Help please)

I was on CM 10 alpha4 + nicsptl kernel (Had execllent signal strength even in bathroom, lift)

Due to bad battery life I decided to go back to stock. vai xxkpe > DDLF2

After flashing latona I could not get the phone in download mode so did hardware reset (reset btton between camera and speaker + download buttons (see http://xdaforums.com/show....php?t=1411768)

I flshed xxkpe and DDLF2+ CF-root. Now I had a big signal drop problem!

So I flshed full xxkpe three times with full data wipes and falshed DDLF2 and CF-root. Same problem.

I thought CM10 + nicsptl might be better so I flashed them (flashed CM10 thrice + gapps to be sure)

Same signal problem!

Flashed signal-fix kernel, cleared dalvik same issue!

I read this thread http://xdaforums.com/show....php?t=1776211

But I think the reason is not modem or sim. It has to do with hardware reset, I guess.

Can any one help?
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] abdelbachir:
Hello, I have recently found a Sony Xperia on my seat while travelling on a plane. (I can't know whether it's the Arc or the Arc S). But, the thing is, the phone is locked so I can't access anything on it. Does anyone know how can I delete the password in order to use the phone?
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] SammiSaysHello:
Yes but I won't tell you. Turn it in to the appropriate authority

Sent from Xperia Arc S
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] notown775:
don't be that guy. just return it.
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] abdelbachir:
Well, how do you guys expect me to return it if I can't even access the contact list or anything on the phone?

Don't even tell me to give it to the list and founds, we all know that it's useless.

I actually asked almost everyone on the plane whether it was their phone.
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] SammiSaysHello:
Then that's the responsibility you have not upheld because you wouldn't even turn it to the lost and found

It should also be noted that you mentioned in your original post that you wanted to unlock the phone to use it. Not return it.

In the end, if you want to keep it for yourself instead of doing the responsible thing, that's entirely up to your conscience

Sent from Xperia Arc S
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] abdelbachir:
Because i said "use it" then it clearly implies that I don't plan to return it? English isn't my first language but I don't think it is contradictory. I can "use it" to access the contacts, etc.

You may say I'm irresponsible and all kind of stuff, but I think I was kind enough asking everybody on the plane whether the phone was theirs. Like it or not, you would have done the same in my place, try and give it back if the phone is the belonging of someone in the plane, if not, then too bad, I keep it.

I'm not a liar, I plan to keep the phone, as I said, I found it on a plane. The owner probably is in india, england, or whatever country.

You can judge me but be honnest, I did the necessary, giving it to the lost and found is just completely useless.
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] notown775:
you should've mentioned that you asked everyone on the plane. when someone says they wanna bypass a lock screen they want to access the info. at least in my eyes.. you refuse to turn it into lost and found because you think its "useless" .. scoff. you found a free phone and your intentions are to keep it . plain and simple. did you leave the Sim card in it?? maybe they'll call it. but as long as you keep saying you want to keep it .. you look like a thief in my eyes. just turn it into lost and found even if you think its moot
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] abdelbachir:
Yes, the Sim card is still in it, but if the phone is locked what do you think I could have done?

Damn, Lost and Found is a scam, and you know it perfectly that it would have been useless, the only thing that would have happened was either the phone would rot on a shelf or another idiot would take the phone.

I did ask everyone on the plane. You can act like I was a thief and think you are an angel but you know I did the right thing. Lost and found would be useless, you just can't admit it.
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] SXUsr:
Or the person it belongs might have enquired, "has anyone found a Phone". Not everyone who works in "lost and found" is a scally....

- http://www.usatoday.com/story/ondeadline/2012/10/08/las-vegas-cabdriver-taxi-money-found/1619863/
[Xperia Arc Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] popthosegaskets:
IMO, you should keep the phone and let the person call his phone. Since you can't unlock it, the phone would be useless to you. If the guy doesn't give a damn, then I wont know what to do with it.

Now to the subject of unlocking...

There is no way to bypass this except to use Google account or by flashing the phone with SEUS. The Google account must be associated with the phone, however.

僕のLT18iから送られてきた
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Themes and Apps] newarkoz:
I just want to share a Facebook app i found on Aptoide!

This is an alternative to the official Facebook app. Many people, just like me, don't like the original one because it uses much ram and is always running on background consuming much battery.

The size of this app is 59kb because it uses the browser app for mobile phones, but instead of using the browser, you have an app to keep it simple :laugh:

Changes i made:

- Changed the name from Touch Client for Facebook to Facebook

- Changed the icon to the Facebook icon

- Translated to PT-PT (has English too)

Screenshots

DOWNLOAD (3 ways)

On the attachements

http://www.mediafire.com/?ze515t555q13603

https://www.dropbox.com/s/im5ywlwh77smwpo/Facebook.apk

I don't know who did the app so i didn't put credits in this thread!

I don't think this is warez, but if some moderator thinks otherwise, let me know and i will remove it :)
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Themes and Apps] subha632:
This may be a keylogger ?????

Sent from GALAXY ACE
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Themes and Apps] newarkoz:
I am 99% positive that it isn't, because it is only a browser and it redirects to the http://touch.facebook.com/ but using an app and not the browser!
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Themes and Apps] chris_crash:
Thanxs for this app, but if you used to Link2SD move all apps incluide Facebook, * Remember being super user*
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Themes and Apps] clepperM:
This app is called FBM via Facebook in the market. Just installed and started using again. Glad you altered the name and icon. Was going to do it myself until I stumbled upon this thread.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Themes and Apps] newarkoz:
It's not the same app, but the base is the same, uses the touch.facebook.com... The main difference is the notifications, but uses more ram that way. :)
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Themes and Apps] Warren87:
This is sweet, good job!!
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Themes and Apps] SuperAce609:
Hmm.. do you think I can find something else optimized for 2G? Besides the SLK notification + Opera Mini combo. They work pretty awesome but the opera mini version of the site has a couple of features missing.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Themes and Apps] LaShto34:
Thanks, man. Finally, Facebook on my phone, without that huge original app. Simple and efficient. Have a great day. I know I will.:D

By the way, I decompiled it, translated to my language and it's absolutely perfect now. Thank you once again.
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Themes and Apps] newarkoz:
Thanks! I agree with you, now we can have Facebook on our Ace :P

I translated to portuguese too, i didn't add any more languages because i only know English and Portuguese xD
[Galaxy Ace S5830 Themes and Apps] newarkoz:
What is the url that Opera Mini uses to access Facebook? It is touch.facebook.com?