yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] d_Schizzo:
You will never know if you dont try it yourself.

For me its not stable, and for many others also. For me 1.5ghz is stable with 1450mv.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] bogdan1980:
I'm on group 2, 1.5ghz/1.375mv.

Wife on group 3, 1.5ghz/1.375mv.

Galaxy S2 powered by Dorimanx!
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Dominic4:
exFAT

After boot to android my exFAT sd Card working properly I can see sd card in file explorer but I can not see it in recorvery... only SD formatted as FAT32 works in recorvery
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Nemivsek:
Ok i just raise to 1.5ghz and leave voltage as it is . I played vice city for 1h 30min and there was no problems . But its funny that is anutut benchmark score always the same around 9700-10700 no metter if its on 1.2ghz or 1.5ghz :confused:
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] d_Schizzo:
I read a time ago that its stable for you at 1375mv and i have tried it but my phone stuck at boot with this voltage.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Nemivsek:
My phone can handle it to at 1.375 ;D Now i will wait few days and make some stress test on 1.5ghz and then i will try the max 1.6ghz oc :cool:
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] nihilista:
That's because Antutu benchmark tests more than cpu, and like at Home PC bit increase of CPU (like 200 or 300 mhz)didn't give really noticeable boost. There are too much other hardware related things like GPU, Mem or somewhat.....

Thats why OC mostly is just a placebo for your eyes ;)

Btw, benchmarking is a synthetic thing, for me Antutu score always has differences by 200-300 points, even with same settings.

Generally CPU OC gives most boost for applications like video coding, that needs full CPU power :)
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Nemivsek:
Thank you for this informations :good:
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] fubo73:
For instance, look at screenshot. Before reset I had dori, after I had apolo. Note Attivo baron the two cases.

Inviato dal mio GT-I9100 usando Tapatalk 4
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] bogdan1980:
On 8.39 there was an bug?! Or annoyance. When i went to settings, running apps and look at free ram it was 50mb, that create an huge lag.

In 8.39 b4 is fixed, i have 400mb free there.

http://db.tt/A1nUscET

Dorimanx did it again. Kernel is 100% stable for 1 day.

Galaxy S2 powered by Dorimanx!
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] GoJo ^^:
problem is battery get like -10%/hours while normally 3%..?
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] GoJo ^^:
I'm wondering if BLN is not culprit..? When though the BLNW was selected..
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] budsixz:
Lol just had a dream that dori released v9.40 :D

My phone details :

Rom : carbonrom stable v1.8

Kernel : dorimanx v9.39

Governor : hyper

Oc gpu to 400 mhz

OC to 1.4 ghz

No UV

Battery : stock 1650mah

Sent from i9100

bob's battery guide
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] stopro:
Hi dori & team it will be posible to implement awake voltages/screen off voltages/ sleep voltages in one tab . i mean when u listen music u use 200mhz if u set les vol u should use less power. I knw i can set manualy but if that would be automatic wil save time. Any way wot voltage cpu use in deep sleep
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] eskriminal:
the voltage on sleep remains the same

in answer to your question, you shouldn't do that

if an uv is stable, it should be stable everywhere and so you don't want to increase that voltage ever
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] stopro:
Thx now i get . i think i didnt explained rite . i knw we can restrict cpu in sleep (default is 800mhz) how u said with voltage we set , but when u use phone and u uv u losse performance i read this chip enginer post about it . but when for example listen music with screen off cpu use 200mhz rite with max scaling screen off depend wot u set (default 800mhz) and if we have automatic voltage change with screen off - on, and we uv on screen off listen to music or in deep sleep we could save some more battery and when we wake up phone dynamic voltages will back to screen on voltages mean u gett full power am i rite . like my cpu is class 1 with highest voltages 200@1000v and when i listen music its draining but if i could set 900v or below depend from cpu i could extend battery life u get me now ,but when i set manualy 900 i feel performance losse and if this would be automatic i wouldnt see nothing thats my point . and this could be another point to make this kernel more battery friendly
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Nemivsek:
Not bad :D
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] eskriminal:
the performance lost is negligible, unless the uv is unstable

essentially either that would mean your phone is a) on an unnecessarily high voltage when screen is on, or b) unstable when screen is off
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] oL00No:
Forget everything you're thinking. The CPU is not an energy hog. And a 50-100 mw uv won't get you any noticeable extra battery.

Also, at least TRY to write so people can understand you (not u). People like eskriminal are helping you for free. Show some respect, pup.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] stopro:
Wot is ur point cos i dnt get wot u on about cos i dnt get . really:eek: i didnt knw that they do that for free thx to let me knw . :thumbup: and if u be that kind point me no respect from me ok.

Trust me u do save battery with uv i l

Knw screen is hungriest for battery. But when u turn off and listen music cpu is locked at 200mhz.

And i didnt said about on screen uv. Read properly
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] eskriminal:
okay, I've already explained the reasons

the simple answer is :

no, it's pointless
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] stopro:
Sorry but i do feel performance loss (scr on)with uv even -25 tiny but i do feel and i was saying about screen off uv nothing else , i tryed even now 200@975v 200@950 and belive me or not i fellt lags screen on but that wasent my point. Before i was very very big fan of uv but no more from 200-1200 have stock voltage and performance is good really good , except last 3 steps 1300-1400-1500 i uv them cos in my case cpu group 1 voltages r high , i dnt knw about other group 1 users they have the same . look my friend a) my group one have really high voltage 1200@1350v a 1500@1450v but i seted 1300@1350v ,1400@1375v, 1500@1400v and its stable and its cooler but but when i uv main steps 200-1200 performance is droping , feel lags-redraws even if i set extream performance.

B) uv its stable even with extram uv but how i said loosing performance with screen on.

Cum back to topic, my point was when u listen to music or just dnt use phone (deep sleep) ,uv cpu could help u save some more battery , i knw and u said when u uv it works both way screen on/off.

Thatsway i was asking it is posible 2 voltage control screen on/off .

Hope u and the rest will get me now .

Thx for ur time mate and yo all dori team:thumbup:
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Bogeyman13:
Please start to write in English, because people don't understand you.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] stopro:
Thx i was writening i didnt saw ur answer

I get wot u saying but why this would be pointles if u can tune this same like govs if u can tune voltages screen on u could tune voltages screen off

---------- Post added at 01:51 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:44 PM ----------

Im sorry but i write in english if u dnt get im sorry mybe u should learn
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] eskriminal:
CPU group one shouldn't uv at all.

and it is pointless

if your device lags with a - 25 uv, it's not stable and you shouldn't be using it

if it didn't lag, that would be stable, and having different uv for screen on and off is pointless

and your writing doesn't bother me, but don't tell others to learn English when they write eloquently and you don't
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Kyuuba:
Hmm don't take his feedback as an offense, I clearly understood what he said, many people know that his English is terrible and needs a big improvement, but don't threat him that bad however, I can conclude that his idea or implementation doesn't make sense at all because the performance should not be compromised regardless of the state and screen.

Let's focus on improvement and not d*ck-ride Dorimanx to remain well in front of him, otherwise...taking people's feedbacks as offense won't ever never help to improve the kernel.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] merlin21:
[MENTION=4829919]piing[/MENTION] who doesn't write in the thread it belongs to...

There was never such a problem with Dorimanx and I follows the thread for more then a year...

Flash another clean rom as second rom and and look if there's the problem too. If so I bet it's a fault of your hardware?! Something wrong with it- just an idea. Good luck
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] stopro:
Ok thx that is enough to knw thx for good answer . mate a about my language its learned british english u think am talking bad u should see how british people talk betwen them self, my gf is english and when she write to me sometime aint got clue wot she is on about. Well if u use all the time language like this its obvious u learn and use it. Some people get some dont sorry i tryed my best

---------- Post added at 06:47 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:45 PM ----------

Lag dnt mean its unstable with gb and old syish i could uv really low without with syiah 4+ abit less but still low without sods

---------- Post added at 06:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:47 PM ----------

If u saying uv dsnt harm performance mean this chip enginier was talking crap yes thatsway i was sayinv set voltages for screen off phone is nearly sleep thatsway i was concluding less voltage more juice
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] piing:
I already tried 3 different ROM and Kernel and i have the same problems... BUT when i use dorimanx kernel and disble LCD POWER REDUCE ALL IS FINE ( yeah i am becoming crazy)d.( maybe an issue with lcd power reduce)

EDIT : i already tried dual boot
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] 99x:
I think you would encounter instability long before you see any noticeable performance loss. As long as it's stable I can't see why there would be any issues, 200MHz is not going to be any different screen on or off, it doesn't make any sense.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] stopro:
Thatsway i was asking for simple explanation thx to both of u eks
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] merlin21:
But it's a solved problem already.. Your inverter is damaged and Display function is OK with full power...

Perhaps Dorimanx read this and can write the different of Power reduce LCD on and off...
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] piing:
it would be great :)

sry but i don 't know what is an inverter :s

if it's broken is it my fault ? Can anything happen more than this ?
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] stopro:
Just observed same issue with cpu scaling had that before few kernels bk and reported it.

I seted cpu on max 600mhz its working fine when screen is on but when i turn off and on both min&max freq jump to 1000mhz and stay for a while then min freq cum bk to normal 200mhz,max stay at 1000mhz.

looks like cpu freq restriction dsnt work properly.

currently im on zzmove , previously this issue had with pegasusq,hyper,ondemand,intelimand.

Asuming that splitting cpu freq to 2 sliders cause this issue.

Funny thing when i set max cpu 600mhz ,conect to charger ,turn off screen it charge faster . by my thinking this shouldnt happen , screen off, shouldnt matter if u set max is o 1200mhz or 1600mhz. When screen off , no extra draining/slowing dwns

---------- Post added at 03:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:15 PM ----------

Dorimanx greate job even with 600mhz phone is quite smooth (browsing,multitasking etc.)

I cant wait for next relase.

Thx and wish u and D-Team good day :thumbup:
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] StalCaiRe:
I got the problem that my phone suddenly reboots and after that I am unable connect to my wlan (WPA2 PSK) ... wlan shows the network as WPA/WPA2 PSK and tells me that there is an authentification error ...

Can someone pls help or know what happens ... :'(

Gesendet von meinem GT-I9100 mit Tapatalk 4
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] m1trand1r:
did you try to clean wifi lease from Stweaks ..."other" tab...?

or simply reboot again....?
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] fradbari:
Hi, what's the best kernel version (9.xx)for battery life?

I tried almost dorimanx version; I remember the 14, and 33...what do you think?!?!

Inviato dal mio GT-i9100 con Tapatalk 4
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] budsixz:
Hmmm.... Just saw a dual booting kernel for s4(exynos)

Can we take something from his kernel n dual boot as well (please don't bash me if this is stupid suggestion :D)

My phone details :

Rom : carbonrom stable v1.8

Kernel : dorimanx v9.39

Governor : hyper

Oc gpu to 400 mhz

OC to 1.4 ghz

No UV

Battery : stock 1650mah

Sent from i9100

bob's battery guide
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Morngkilr:
But.... This kernel has been dualbooting for ages hasent it???
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] :
Yes, dual-boot is possible due to gokhanmoral's recovery. We could have a newer recovery (CyanogenMod) but it doesn't support dual-boot. gokhanmoral has paused/discontinued his work but never released sources of his work. So unfortunately dorimanx has no chance to edit/improve/change it =/
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] infatality:
Source? Will be good for [MENTION=2376110]dorimanx[/MENTION] to consider..

---------- Post added at 08:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:53 PM ----------

Yes.. But don't forget.. We can't have our recovery updated due to closed source code in recovery for dual boot.. If there's a new way to dual boot, [MENTION=2376110]dorimanx[/MENTION] could ditch the old recovery and update the recovery.. :D:p
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] budsixz:
http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=44916999

My phone details :

Rom : carbonrom stable v1.8

Kernel : dorimanx v9.39

Governor : hyper

Oc gpu to 400 mhz

OC to 1.4 ghz

No UV

Battery : stock 1650mah

Sent from i9100

bob's battery guide
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Morngkilr:
Hummm never even dawned on me that the recovery wasent up to date lmao... Kernel works so good i figured it was ;)
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Mr_S:
I think if I was dori I would drop dual boot and build my own recovery so as up to date ;). However I'm not and he hasn't. Just my opinion
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] fradbari:
Hi, what's the best kernel version (9.xx)for battery life?

Inviato dal mio GT-i9100 con Tapatalk 4
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] stopro:
999
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] toffiko:
Lol I had the same dream :highfive: Hope our dream will come true soon ;) :victory:
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] m1trand1r:
every kernel is best for battery life of you configure it properly:p

so....what's wrong with current recovery?:confused:

do you guys use recovery more than ROM ?:p
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] stopro:
My phone start behave wird today mean start overheat,slowdown,close aps . except yesterday for test usualy i set performance profile. How i said my phone respond faster with 1000 then 1500 i feelt lags &heat with 1500 wird . i changrt to darknes for while and heat dtoped but performance wasent that then few min ago i set extream profile phone is warm and i knw its rubish but i get this
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] stopro:
Ican say now extream performance is really xetream its bloody smooth everywhere its more then butter its olive oil or more like castrol gtx thx dori i thought and had the same feeling like rkoby performance profile was faster but now only one thing i can say i can say extream pergormance+zzmove is wow like murcialago 3.6 to 100 . with this u dnt care about fuel .

And one more thx dori for that u r like amg to mercedes or alpine to bmw or ruf to porshe just ....... Mybe i exajurate but big wow
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] m1trand1r:
bwahahaha....r u drunk again?:p...lol....comparing people with RR3 cars....bwahahaha.....u re playin' RR3 too much butty:p
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] stopro:


---------- Post added at 01:18 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:16 AM ----------
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] budsixz:
Nothing wrong with it recovery it's awesome

But i thought v can get a straight forward dual booting procedure like the old days

My phone details :

Rom : carbonrom stable v1.8

Kernel : dorimanx v9.39

Governor : hyper

Oc gpu to 400 mhz

OC to 1.4 ghz

No UV

Battery : stock 1650mah

Sent from i9100

bob's battery guide
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] umair42:
I got 5k+ with this kernel :p
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] bogdan1980:
With nightmare i get the best score on quadrant, 5500. But I'm staying on ondemand.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jpeg725:
Firstly, didn't you notice the second half of what rkoby said?

Secondly. Where does vold.fstab come from? - Why not just modify it in your rom's zip file?

[MENTION=2376110]dorimanx[/MENTION]: In the dev thread the link to the discussion thread is really far down. I would probably be a good idea to put it near the top where you say « Which kind of posts are not allowed here and belongs only to the discussion thread?
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] m1trand1r:
well....I googled a bit about this storage swap on 4.3....and found this:

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?p=45169479

but....we don't have that particular line in build.prop.....so i'm not sure if this is it.....some1 on 4.3 base could try to add that line and experiment and potentially post how it goes:good:

about your suggestion with discussion thread link....it'd be good to post it at the very top and at the very bottom of dev thread OP.....but trick is that most users don't even read OP ....they just hit that "last page" button and post junk afterwards :eek::(
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] jpeg725:
Found this on http://source.android.com/devices/tech/storage/

You have a point, there is no file with fstab as part of its name in cm-10.2 zips. Its probably in the initial ramdisk. Which means either you'd have to compile your own kernel, or hope there is a working config option such as the one in build.prop

I haven't yet tried cm-10.2, I'm waiting for it to stabilise a bit.

Good luck
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] spankymo:
just out of curiosity.. since I'm not using dual boot, would dorimanx kernel still work if I flash the latest CWM recovery? or are there other dependencies between dorimanx and the siyah-bundled recovery other than dual booting support?
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] infatality:
I don't think it's will work.. As I believe there's difference in the coding used in dorimanx kernel.. I may be wrong but you may try and see if it works or not.. I don't think there's any harm trying..
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Hopper8:
Forgive me if I'm wrong... I thought for i9100 that the recovery is 'baked into' the kernel... Ie, whatever other recovery is flashed, it will only be there till the next reboot, as a temporary CWM. Could be wrong but I don't think it'll work.

Sent from a galaxy far, far away
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] infatality:
Yes.. Nothing wrong.. It's supposed to be this way for this kernel..
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] :
Just tried updating the recovery via ROM Manager. I can use it if I reboot into CWM from the app itself.

If I use the key combination to boot into CWM recovery it doesn't boot CWM but instead it boots the recovery that comes with dorimanx kernel :b

Don't get me wrong, everythings fine with the kernel and its recovery. Just wanted to try :)
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] infatality:
So it's confirmed that even if we flash another recovery, it still will automatically roll back to default recovery came with the kernel..
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dkgr_ser:
A problem I realized and is surely existing since x.38 (now using 9.39v8) is the low throttle temperature. On previous versions, after playing RR3 for some time or any other demanding game the device was getting really hot, and I remember this happening to every kernel even on stock clocks. Now it just throttles to 800mhz all the time. Even on 1.2Ghz it just exceeds the limit after some seconds using Stability Test V2.7 with just stressing the cpu. If I stress the GPU simultaneously (like in real gaming), the limit temp is hit a bit quicker. If I overclock to 1.5 or 1.6 (which is what I've been always using in the past) the limit is exceeded a lot quicker, so it throttles to .8 for a sec, restores to 1.6 for two, throttles again to .8 for three sec, back again on 1.6 for one and so on. The heat at the back of the device of course has nothing to do with the heat generated in the past. Now the phone is just warm. Then it was hot!

P.S. Another guy also posted about this in DEV thread, so he can refer to my post if needed, which is on the right place.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] bogdan1980:
Oficial rom, dorimanx kernel, v8.14, at 1.5ghz is working till 68C, then lower to 1ghz.

LATESTS Kernels, at 1.5ghz till 68c them back to 800mhz.

Translate, it means that games performance will be lower on latest kernels.

Test on hyper or ondemand.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Truman82:
Mm I think performance profiles shows in benchmarks and maybe in games. If you are in 4.3,it's as smooth it gets imo with casual setting.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] 7HUND3R:
Which is the best governor/scheduler configuration for both battery and smothness in your opinion?
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] m1trand1r:
well....TBH....you need to test them out for your specific Stweaks settings....because everything (almost) what's set....affects battery life....like GPU, RAM, SCREEN settings....higher clocks means lower battery life...or higher drain....even slide2wake swith drains quite a lot battery:eek:...I turned it of for a while because my battery drain was increased after enabling it:)
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] 7HUND3R:
Thanks for your answer! My stweaks settings are the default ones of the kernel..and I try to avoid to enable all these sensors, thing, lights that drain my battery for sure..is hyper/ondemand bfq/bfq the best solution with default settings?
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] dkgr_ser:
Well, according to what I feel when I'm holding the phone, the temperature at the back is much less compared to the past. After one hour of RR3 it is like browsing for the same time, just warm!

To what I remember from some changelogs, dori said that it throttles at 68C and restores clocks at 60C? So the cores' temperature won't drop below 60C when under heavy load if overheat is what causes the throttle. Never. Whatever the throttle speed is. Even if it drops to 200mhz, it will just hit the safe temperature quicker and then restore back to the step decided by the governor, till it reaches again max temp and do the same again.

So, after one hour of gaming the area close to the camera will normally burn like hell, like always did. But the fact here is that it doesn't. Not more than 36-38C there. And even on 1.2Ghz and stock voltages, under 100% CPU load and 0% GPU load it will throttle after ~15 secs. Samsung definitely didn't design the chip to do so. For better tests any app to tell exactly the temperature of the cores? Not just the battery temp.
[Galaxy S II Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] bogdan1980:
Android Tuner. I saw 66c in asphalt 6,7,8 on 8.3x kernels. But it's cooler now, like 25c or so outside.

At 800mhz throttle instead of 1ghz we loose 2 fps, which count on powerful games like nfs most wanted, batman.

Maybe Dorimanx will bump cpu throttle back to 1ghz because we enter autumn, then winter, then spring.