yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] qtwrk:
TWRP backed up my 4.1.1 , wipe system and data, install 4.2 ..

okay , everthing was fine , and then i figured out AOKP 4.2 isn't fully mature yet, so i restore my 4.1 in TWRP...

after reboot, i saw something terrible that all my data in SDCARD is gone !

but connect to PC, it still says same usage as 10 GB occupied and only 2 GB free space ...

so... how to recover SDCARD data ???
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] qtwrk:
yeah... well , never mind ... i just found them in 0 folder

it just didn't appear in the first time i access to SDcard ...

guess Windows has some delay about it ...

this is gonna take me all night to copy files ... damn it ...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] jerrycycle:
Are you using the latest version of Twrp? I think the sdcard/0 is the way it's going to be when flashing 4.2 because of the multi user account option.

K786 has a guide to keep the same format in the Dev section
[Motorola Droid Bionic] Crepusculi:
Hey all!

So I'm trying to use SMS Barrage to send many (MANY) messages to a local radio station to win a contest for concert tickets. You can send in as many entries (texts) as you want, so i'd figured i'd automate the process. HOWEVER, the number i have to send the texts to is a 5-digit short code, and my phone throws this warning up every time a text is trying to send to a short code. Now, granted, this is nice that Google is trying to protect us, but I feel I can take care of myself. Does anyone know a way to disable this warning, as it appears for EVERY singe message that is sent via sms barrage, so not very automated. I'm running the unofficial version of CM10 found here.
[Motorola Droid Bionic] Drunkula:
Never seen that one before, and I've sent to short codes before as well. Of course I wasn't trying to flood anybody either nor was I using CM10 (not that I think that matters).
[Motorola Droid Bionic] Crepusculi:
well i know that it's not an issue with flooding, i sent a single text to a different short code a while back, and the warning appeared, but i didn't think anything of it.
[Motorola Droid Bionic] pizzle85:
post1
[General Questions and Answers] kads1102:
Is it possible to flash a kernel on a rooted Lenovo P700i?:confused: Im just a noob here.:o Thanks in advance.
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] MikeJennni:
I am un rooted and using nova prime launcher. If I download a font can I change my system font to the downloaded one? If so wherw would I place this downloaded font for system to see it.

After downloading a new font it just has the original 4 or 5 thats it.
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] MikeJennni:
Annnnnyone?
[T-Mobile, Samsung Galaxy SIII] Craniotomy:
Try fontomizer sp in google play.
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] Kimiko72:
I am running the latest build from Muzzy for the Sprint Galaxy Nexus currently released yesterday. OS V 4.2.1

I am not having any issues with GPS locking in but when I try to use the Sprint Family Locator app, I am unable to locate my son's phone also on the same rom. I get a general network based location but cannot get a GPS location. I flashed his phone back to the stock 4.1.1 image from Google and the problem went away. It's as if the app cannot request a precise GPS location. Any thoughts?

I love the new builds and would hate to go back to stock but being able to keep tabs on my child is important. Knowing he is within a 1200 ft raduis is funny but not helpful LOL
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] hazysight:
Fixed?

You posted this a while ago and I was just wondering if you ran into a fix?

I am running a 4.2.1 rom and my GPS locks onto satellites but the tracking is way off.

I use a workout tracking app that worked fine but after my update to a 4.2.1 rom the tracking is not working.

I tried multiple workout trackers and all are having the same problem.

I know for a fact that my route is 15 miles, but the trackers now report I've gone on a 190+ mile trip...
[Samsung Galaxy Nexus] robogoflow:
I have problems with GPS on a different ROM but when I turn on both settings in location access it works fine.

I don't like to use the allow Google to collect my data but give it a try its the allow WiFi and mobile network location.

Sent from a slice of Galaxy Nexus with some Rasbean Jelly!
[Galaxy Note II Accessories] steveoca:
$4 Note 2 car mount.

Throw away every thing but the grabber .

Sticky back Velcro on the mirror and mount, done.

Velcro can be removed from the mirror with no damage, (if you decide the Note2 takes up your whole windscreen)

Clean and Stable while driving, access to s-pin and note

Rear view camera, Bluetooth audio,directions,etc...

Relative distance from head in last pic

Sorry for the crappy pics

Shown with Nillkin Matte Hard Case (good case)

All about this phone, Right! Love it
[Galaxy Note II Accessories] Clockwerks77:
Is it me or does that seem potentially a case for a distracted driving charge?
[Galaxy Note II Accessories] sweets55:
Is that a semi in my mirror no it's my note 2. :silly:
[Galaxy Note II Accessories] Gary02468:
I don't see why it'a any more distracting than any other visible mount location.

It does, though, obstruct much of the rear-view mirror view, which is dangerous and probably illegal.
[Galaxy Note II Accessories] flaring afro:
Screens that high are illegal, at least in VA. This is probably mainly for night vision reasons as the glare from it will make it hard for your eyes to adjust. Also, why would you want to take away most of your rear view?

EDIT: At least mounted are, not sure if a phone mount would be a loophole.
[Galaxy Note II Accessories] 00mred00:
There is no way that would survive my driving style/habits
[Galaxy Note II Accessories] Its TwiX:
Having anything on/hanging off your rear-view mirror is against the law. Does that mean you will get pulled over for it? No. But I bet you'll get written up for it before someone hanging an air freshener on theirs does. ;D
[Galaxy Note II Accessories] Joe333x:
Lol to all the people taking about rear view laws. I drove box trucks for years, which obviously do not have rear view mirrors. Side mirrors are the only necesarry mirrors for driving.
[Galaxy Note II Accessories] rx7boy22:
Definately looks distracting though, but you are right big trucks do not have any rear view mirrors :)

John
[Galaxy Note II Accessories] flaring afro:
It's not getting pulled over, it's getting in an accident and it being declared your fault because of it (even if it wasn't really the cause). I can see a police officer saying it was your fault because you can't see behind you or because you couldn't see out as well at night. You could try to take it off really quickly, but with everything going on might not think about it.
[Galaxy Note II Accessories] funnycreature:
There's a huge difference between not having something and having it but it's not useful. In TX, when I was getting my motorcycle license, you don't really need a helmet (with the right insurance) but if you DO have a helmet, it needs to be DOT approved. Mine came from Germany so it didn't have the DOT sticker but all other international safety approvals. Was a no-go.
[Galaxy Note II Accessories] Jed Dignazio:
Just got a ticket in CT about three months ago for an air freshener hanging off my rear view mirror!:crying:
[Galaxy Note II Accessories] xartic12:
in Indiana, most parking tags/permits have a disclaimer on them that say to take them off while the vehicle is in motion and to only hang them while it is parking.

I like this idea, but not when it's an obstruction to my safety, as well as others on the road.
[Galaxy Note II Accessories] Gary02468:
The ticket was for obstructing your view out the windshield, not for obstructing the rear view mirror itself. (The OP's mount does some of each, though.)
[Galaxy Note II Accessories] SINGAPOREAN:
You could always turn on the front facing camera, thus the Note II will act as your rear-view mirror /camera as well :)

or if you can find a 3rd party camera app, add that to your multiview, thus you can have GPS + camera side-by-side

(Note II needs to be rooted to add non-stock apps to multiview)
[Galaxy Note II Accessories] ChrisEmerson:
Rear View mirrors are not needed for a car to be on the road, but if the manufacturer supplied one that doesn't mean you are just allowed to tamper with it or remove it! You have to have the kit that is designed to come with the car. What mirrors a vehicle has to have at a minimum is a law for the manufacturers to follow, not you.
[Galaxy Note II Accessories] flaring afro:
They actually are required (at least by most state laws). A Lotus Exige comes with a rear view mirror that shows a nice view of a supercharger and intercooler and NONE of the road or cars on it because the laws say it has to have a rear view mirror haha
[Galaxy Note II Accessories] patrickoneal:
I certainly wouldn't mount a phone to the rear view mirror. People doing stupid things like that are what gets laws passed disallowing anything attached to the windshield. That's why a lot of GPS units come with a plastic disc to stick on the dashboard for the suction cup to stick to. Idiots putting them in the middle of the windshield ruined it for everyone else in their state.

As far as mirrors go, I'm sure it varies by state. Virginia requires only two mirrors, whether they be side view, rear view, or some combination. An old car I have only has a rear view and one side view mirror. What sucks about that is that I can't tint the windows unless I have two side view mirrors.
[Galaxy Note II Accessories] steveoca:
Yea, every device i have had has been a distraction, this positioning, to me seems safe (yes, only in your pocket) in moderation.

To me its more "heads up" (see bmw's new heads up display, sh*t, talk about a distraction. see pic)

Its a transit connect so it has a pretty big wind screen and these 2 OEM side mirrors with built in blind spot mirror. (see pic)

So with what i have, i look directly out the back window with half the rear view mirror.

To me it's in the same place as all the other stuff that's in the way.(better seat view pic).

But, as we all know, it surely is another reason to be pulled over-- (2012 California vehicle code book, currently 1133 pages)

Good time to test drive the voice recondition...

disregard the alien
[Galaxy Note II Accessories] fozzir:
It's cool!

I'm doin it. In CA the device must be within 5 inches of the lower left windshield or 7 if mounted on the lower right. In this configuration you could just take it down (provided you aren't stopped for it) if pulled over.
[Galaxy Note II Accessories] flaring afro:
VA is weird because laws are different for manufactured cars vs kit cars/aftermarket etc. I mean, I understand there are exemptions for antiques since they were made without things but I believe there even are different tint laws depending on custom vs manufacturer (all of which are very little tinting anyways).

I think Lotus put the mirrors on all of them though so there aren't problems selling across state lines, which happens a lot with exotics. Otherwise people might have trouble with inspections elsewhere.
[Galaxy Note II Accessories] lovekeiiy:
I would be more concerned about it flying during an accident.
[Galaxy Note II Accessories] ChrisEmerson:
I live in the UK, the law is different here and you can get away even with only 1 wing mirror I think in some cases, BUT if the manufacturer has fitted it, it has to stay and be operational
[Galaxy Note II Accessories] DeRock13:
Yet in many states, a Jeep can have the doors off without having to relocate the side mirrors to the bracket near the windshield (or windscreen if you prefer that phrase).

Sent from the White Monolith: Part Deux
[Galaxy Note II Accessories] methodz:
It's not worth the risk. With the attention spans that most people have the guy behind you is going to be looking at what you are watching on your note 2! then he will rear end you and say he was distracted by your 5.5" phone hanging off your rearview mirror. Then the cop is going to ask you did you have a giant phone hanging off your rearview... and there goes everyone's insurance rate.
[HTC Droid DNA] mahsan988:
I have been deciding between Droid DNA and MAXX HD. I really want the DNA for its killer specs (that won't be outdone until at least end of 2013 or early 2014) and the amazing screen. But one thing I dislike is Sense, it is resource heavy and drains the battery. Plus I have the GNex and love my stock JB :D

Is there any possibility that we will see a fully stock ROM for the DNA?! I think this will greatly help me make my decision, because if I have to stay with stock skins, I would much rather live with Moto's skin. It is 90% stock-ish.

Thanks!
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] daveid:
I think our development fora should be linked with the other 7105 variants, there is significant progress towards CM10 and other AOSP in the AT&T forum.

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2018411

But, since there are four (ours, international 7105, AT&T, and Sprint), the devs are scattered, when unity would breed much more success. Our accessories is already linked, how about a linked development (not just the unused developers only forum) or moving threads like this to the linked dev forum? Either way, maybe this will help bring attention to the progress that has been made.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] fix-this!:
As long as i get aosp before the verizon or sprint varients. Glad to know progress is being made.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] daveid:
This isn't and shouldn'tbe about first, besides once one 7105 variant has a working device tree, we all do.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] mojorisin7178:
I am trying to get an idea of what the differences are between the phones. From what I gather so far is there is the international 7105 and its variants which are the tmo att and sprints versions and they are all gsm? Then there is the 7100 international and its variant which would be Verizon and they are cdma? But I thought that sprint was cdma carrier so wouldn't the sprint be in with the 7100 version?

From what I understand the physical and specs are the same for all the phones and the hardware is the same except the radio difference between the two. so the software is the major difference. I know on my last phone the sgs2 the att and tmo versions were almost identical twins the two were able to use roms interchangeably without porting except for minor kernel differences. In the end the only problem was the rotation was messed up. and it was fixed by using a the kernel that was native to the device. Like if you used a att rom on a tmo phone you had to use a tmo kernel with it. and also finally someone came up with a flashable .zip fix for it. The .zip fixed the rotation and also the build.prop so that the right device was in the build.prop. So that is what I foresee here in this situation. It will take time but it will happen. I know that we got some real good devs on the tmo side I haven't checked out the other variants yet but I am sure they got some real good devs too. A phone like this was bound to attract top quality people ( and schmucks like me too) I would definitely like to see a dev only subforum for all the devices or even a forum it doesn't have to be a sub forum because then the info will be fragmented because which forum do you put it in tmo, att, sprint, international. I say make a 7105 variant dev only forum for them to talk and work out some kick ass stuff. Like AOSP and cm and of course the ultimate AOKP. And whatever else they come up with.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] _Dennis_:
7105 = international LTE

Variants include:

AT&T

T-mobile

Sprint

Verizon

7100 = international GSM

7102 = Chinese GSM/CDMA dual SIM

Differences include radio hardware/software.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] sino8r:
Coming from HTC since the beginning of my smartphone career... I'd don't know jack about Samsung, Odin, and some other differences but isn't there a way to compile roms without the radio lol? Thta would fix alot. I'm sure there might be various issues between carriers but it should work. I get cmda and dual sim models would be different but at&t model should be able to share. As someone meantioned before, once at&t subforum has their branch... we will too. It just seems that mods separated the forums to cut down on confusion for the end user but it hurts development collaboration between development and hurts the end users who read directions and don't flash stuff blindly. I'm just not used to seeing all this talent wasted by being segregated like this. Obviously there is a reason I'm not seeing... whether due to total incompatibility or something else. It couldn't be that simple, could it?! In the meantime, I'm gonna continue to read up on Samsung development and see if there is anything I can do to contribute... no matter how small or insignificant ;)
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] _Dennis_:
there is a way to compile without radios, most of the ROMs do not have radios, or they are optional. Problem is since the radio hardware is different, the kernel needs to be recomplied for the 7105/variants. I will say if they get it on 7105 then AT&T, T-mobile, and Sprint should be easy to get working (sprint would require blobs, T-Mo and AT&T should work out of the box. Verizon would work only if they 1) crack the bootloader or 2) make a special k-sec version of the rom. There is a new dev section that crosses all boards so that should help the devs some. Basicaly if we get 7105 AOSP we get TMO/AT&T/Sprint and possibly Verizon.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] mojorisin7178:
I saw on g+ that they got a bootoble version of cm 10 on the note 2 I do not know which model and it was not a dd but it boots. That is a promising sign. We will have it soon. I cant wait. For now I am sticking with stock until a working aokp comes out. That is what I did with my sgs2 when we got ics. I didnt even bother rooting it till aokp came out.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] deeznutz1977:
Cmenard said hes got aokp on our note but he s having ril problems...http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php...//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_Interface_Layer
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] nuwayman:
Madmack in our forums has a fully working cm10 he says. He's working on getting up on github and then post a flashable version for us to test. Only a matter of time now.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] deeznutz1977:
I flashed it and flashed our modem it worked the calls worked data . The home button didnt though ??
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] JFizDaWiz:
i no longer need TouchWiz if GMD SPen Gestures is working on AOSP/AOKP

that's all I really care about, S-Memo I hardly use anymore.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] fix-this!:
Awesome, cannot wait!

---------- Post added at 08:12 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:11 PM ----------

I barely use spen but it would be cool if it could be included in aosp/aokp.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] mojorisin7178:
Check out the dev only sub fourm they are really making some good progress and we got so leagacy devs working on it so it will be soon.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] fix-this!:
Cannot wait for aosp.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] mojorisin7178:
Yea i cant wait too I miss my AOSP
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] sanchitgrover:
Can we flash at&t roms on our tmobile note 2 ??

I'm a fan of cleanroms.. But the developer doesnt develop for us , he develops for at&t .. Can i just flash his rom without any problem ?
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] volcomguyaz:
Yes you can. Flash the cm10 floating around but be sure to flash the T-Mobile modem. I won't brick if you forget to but the reception/ signal will be much better. I'm using it as my daily driver. Its fast and amazing.

Disregard my signature. I'm on Tmo t889
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] tino_b:
To my understanding, yes, you can. I myself am on NOTEorious Prime rom which is based on the N7105 firmware but was made for ATT, all needed to do is flash the Tmo radio to get data and since I like to overclock my devices I also flashed the Note2Core kernel which will work with N7100 and N7105 roms; and on top of that I flashed an AOSP theme made by foreverloco since I can't stand Touchwiz. Overall, the UI looks clean just like AOSP (but of course, it ain't the same:crying:) but you can also see some elements of Touchwiz here and there...

I mean, this is just for now until a more stable port of cm10 shows up for our Note2, like you, I also like to have a clean rom and not layer upon layer upon layer. :)

---------- Post added at 08:49 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:41 PM ----------

How is the audio working out for you so far? I read they were having issues before... Have you tried flashing a third party kernel? If so, which one?

Thanks.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] skater4690:
Audio seems to work fine. You have to make 2 phone calls upon boot in order for calls to work correctly And in the beginning of a call it sounds really low so you have to toggle the volume during a call and the. It will be regular and loud again. Otherwise seems to run great. I didn't flash any modems or extra kernels besides updated one that was in the thread.
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] tino_b:
Interesting... I need to try cm10 asap. I'm assuming you didn't have to make any build.prop edits either like other members may have suggested, right?
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] volcomguyaz:
+1

I applied the audio mod floating around and the sound is great. No Kernels yet to flash
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] tino_b:
Awesome! :good:
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] skater4690:
Well you don't have to do any build.prop edits. It will just show that you have an att note though
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] tino_b:
Cool, I should be downloading in a few...:)
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] skater4690:
Be sure to download the ril fix and scaling fix that's in the thread somewhere
[T-Mobile Samsung Galaxy Note II] tino_b:
For sure, thanks for the reminder! :highfive:

Ok, so I got it up and running with cm10, everything working as expected... :D
[Android Apps and Games] androidforlifech:
Android Tools App is for the most favorite devices (Smartphones/Phablets and Tablets)

Search your smartphone and find the customrooms and tools.

New is the "News selection" in the app. Here we post all new infos and pictures from new smartphones and tablets.

Is your smartphone not in the app, go to the plus icon and add your smartphone in the form. We working hard for all devices.

We have Support to:

- Samsung (Note2, Note, S3, S2, Tab10.1, Tab7.7)

- Google (Nexus4, Nexus10, Nexus7, GalaxyNexus (+ Verizon and Sprint), NexusS, NexusOne)

- Asus (Transformer)

- HTC (DroidDNA, OneX, Incredible, Evo3D, DesireHD, Legend)

- LG (Optimus4XHD, OptimusG, L7, Optimus 2X)

- Motorola (RazerHD, DroidX, Droid2, Droid)

- Sony (XperiaS, XperiaNeoV)

Download Link: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.wAndroidTools&feature=search_result#?t=W251bGwsMSwxLDEsImNvbS53QW5kcm9pZFRvb2xzIl0.
[HTC Desire S] tn9:
Hi, I just unlocked my Desire S S-OFF with revolutionary, and I want to flash the latest CM10 - flinnycm10_saga_129.

After reboot phone is stuck on white screen with green htc logo.

HBOOT - 7.00.1002

Radio - 38.03.02.11_M

Recovery - clockwork-touch-5.8.1.5-saga

I tried to flash boot.img from the CM10 ROM with no luck
[HTC Desire S] teadrinker:
Were you running a recent cm10 build before that? If not, maybe you have a non-Sony panel, look at the thread in the general section
[HTC Desire S] BeerOnMars:
I had the same problem. When you've a non-sony panel, flash the saga_kernel_82n.zip from your recovery!