yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] cooperaaaron:
I did not know, but I am looking at my screen and when things are running, 4 cores are used at first ( Project Butter ? ) then it settles down to just 2 cores running with 2 cores offline... is there a tweak to just have two cores only ?
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] cheech87:
When I set the max cpu freq to 1350, and switch to interactive, the hispeed_freq in interactive settings does not override to 1350 as it did in the past. The max cpu freq appears to only obey the global max (and not the hispeed_freq field, for both hispeed_freq > global max or hispeed_freq < global max). Is the hispeed_freq speed doing something different? Or is it not used anymore in the updated interactive governor? (v5.5 gpuoc)

Great kernel so far otherwise!

EDIT: or should we be manually modifying hispeed_freq to match the global max for interactive to scale optimally?
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] bigmase521:
Use "max" in the command instead of min...

Mathkid..any chance of making this a toggle option in kernel control apps like Trickster (like with fast charge/s2w etc)? I know I'd use it more and I'm sure many others would too :good:
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] SA-07:
Re: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

Uh yeah ask the dev of that app to include it.

Setting it to max won't do anything btw

Sent from my Nexus 4
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] bigmase521:
I will ping them.

Setting max online cpus to 2 wouldn't give him just the two online cores he's asking about? I haven't used it yet but seems logical.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] SA-07:
Re: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

No, that module does not exist in this kernel. I only have the min_online_cpus mod.

Look in sys/module/auto_hotplug/parameters

Sent from my Nexus 4
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] cooperaaaron:
I just wanted to know if it's possible ( of course ) and just how to do it.... I do not game on my Nexus 4, so I didn't think I needed the 4 cores to always be running.. Just something to tinker with.... And I have installed all Nexus 4 matrix kernels....with no issues whatsoever in installation and in use, btw. Great work !
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] bigmase521:
Re: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

Ok I see it. I definitely misunderstood the functionality of this feature. It seems that it's only for keeping cores on all the time, for a performance boost. Makes sense now with what you said about the feature to keep temps low.

Any chance of adding the "max cores" module? Would be great for battery saving purposes.

What is the temperature threshold for the feature you added from Franco? I notice that with 5.5 one of my cores is always at 1026 (my max), and not raping back down. Temp at around 30°.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] joshnichols189:
Re: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1[KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

5.5 running great over here. Keep up the good work
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] bigmase521:
Re: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

After more testing with ondemand and interactive govs and all schedulers, no matter what I always have 2 cores online, and one is usually at 1026. With interactive or well occasionally ramp down to 288, but always ramps back up, and it always stays online. Even when cpu load is 0% or 1% .

Haven't messed with min_online_cpus, but the value is "1". What could cause this? Hotplug? It worked correctly on 5.0. It's killing my battery. :confused:
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] sucre213:
Re: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

The download link is dead now....
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] trismegistos:
AW: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

Nope working here. Thx for the update Mathkid, btw

Gesendet von meinem Nexus 4 mit Tapatalk 2
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] ntc3freak:
Re: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

5.5 working nicely, went with non-oc version as I don't game.

Can't wait for PGM compatibility!
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] phunghoang24:
Many many thank for U. The best Kernel!
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] sucre213:
Maybe it's my problem

just come from franco kernel

And the data drop occurs a bunch of times in one hour
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] Lucena04:
I used kernel version OCGPU, speed in NFS MW was very good, was the kernel I tested that gave the best result. But yesterday my phone "died" for no apparent reason (I was not using the phone when it happened). After a few hours recharging the battery and press the power button for over 30 seconds and squeeze it again the phone came back to life. Can you tell me what may have happened to him had this semi-brick?
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] hicks12:
I cant download your new kernel mate, download link is dead it times out :(.

Cant wait to try it :D.

edit: Typical just as I say this, the site now works :) flashing now!.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] JmPTaz09:
Re: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

So far so smooth on 5.5 running interactive and row :beer:
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] technogravy:
Re: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

Great to see MK on the Nexus 4. I used matrix on my Nexus S.

Still figuring my way around the n4. But matter of time before I'm on this kernel.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] 309041291a:
Re: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

What do you guys recommend for battery life? I'm on interactive, row (IO).
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] trismegistos:
AW: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

For battery life ondemand is a bit better. But interactive is so responsive and battery life is quite good.

Gesendet von meinem Nexus 4 mit Tapatalk 2
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] 309041291a:
Re: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

Ondemmand gave me 2.5 hours...
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] aletto:
So if I got it right, there are two versions now, 1. stock gpu clock = 400mhz 2. gpu oc = 487.5 mhz?
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] regular:
I tried both GPU OC and normal version and found that overclocked version got a bit too hot for my liking, but otherwise the kernel has been great!
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] artinz:
Just out of curiosity what is the kernel version I should be seeing I'd I'm running 5.5?
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] cheech87:
for the gpuoc version:

3.4.0-cfs-ge64003f-00855-gf7e60ad

shankar@Matr1x.local #4

Wed Jan 16 20:45:29 CST 2013
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] bigmase521:
Re: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

Anyone else have a problem with core 1 not going offline in 5.5? Looking at the cpu's in Trickster, it never shuts off, and always runs at 1026. I re-flashed 5.5 but no change.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] chappy824:
Re: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

I'm running GPU oc version and don't have this problem. Everything working as expected.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] cheech87:
(i) it sounds like you have your min cpu freq set at 1026 (assuming every state < 1026 is unused according to trickstermod)

(ii) when you have the app open, you will always have at least 1 (or more if you use the hotplug min cores online think mathkid added in). When your screen is off, it should enter deep sleep if your using a "reasonable" governor (ondemand or interactive). If it deep sleep is unused, then either your governor is something like powersave (which pegs your cpu freq at the set min), or you have a rogue app running and/or holding a wakelock, or your phone is charging.

I am also running 5.5 gpuoc and every state between my min and max + deep sleep have cpu time.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] bigmase521:
Re: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

Damn, I was hoping I wasn't alone.

My min is 288 and max is 1026. All states below 1026 are used.

I'd expect one core to be active at idle, but not two (cpu0 and cpu1). Cpu0 will be at 288 but cpu1 will be at 1026 and will not shut off. Occasionally 2 and 3 come online, but they both go offline properly. Cpu1 will not. Tried both ondemand and interactive. If I had a video camera I'd take a video.

I'm not using the min_cores mod, and I double checked and the file is set to "1". I re-flashed a few times but no luck. Don't think it's a rogue app as I've been using every Matr1x version since 1.0 and never had this issue, and definitely have the same app setup since flashing from 5.0 (no updates either). I'll try the gpuoc version to see if it behaves the same way.

Thanks for the responses and ideas though!

Edit: screenshot attached
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] cheech87:
That is odd, although I notice with the new interactive parameters, it's really hard to scale down to just one core. My does eventually (sit idle for about 5-10 seconds) or so but then it likes to ramp up to min on one and max on a second (i also set my hispeed_freq = max cpu = 1350). It should jump down to one core only much faster with on demand.

EDIT: it's also probably not the best test to just stare at trickster mod bc its sampling ram and cpu states and usige and the app is using cpu time to display these. so your "test" is actually inducing load on the system and not truly idle.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] JmPTaz09:
Re: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

Running 5.5 GPU OC version on Killrom; getting great battery life and awesome speed and smoothness! I've been on other kernels lately, but this version seems pretty sweet! I'm undervolted a bit so that 1.5ghz is at 1037 MV and 288 is at 737 mv and haven't had any reboots or other indications of instability! :beer:

p.s. running row and interactive, 288/1.5.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] bigmase521:
Re: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

That's exactly what mine does but the second core never goes down with either governor.

I know trickster puts some load on it just displaying the cpu states, but not much. I don't watch it for hours, I just checked it to see the behavior of the new interactive gov after I flashed and noticed the behavior.

Like I said I've never seen this behavior before on older versions so I noticed it right away. Whatever load Trickster causes hasn't been enough to cause this, especially with the core being stuck at 1026. Even if it was stuck on 288 it wouldn't be as bad. But the fact that it's stuck at all tells me something is wrong.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] aletto:
Re: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

Reposting.

I'm using the first version right now. So far so smooth.

edit: I'm experiencing a few stability issues here. Maybe it's because of the UV, but it used to be stable with harsh's kernel
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] trismegistos:
AW: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

Can you define stability issue a little bit detailed?

Gesendet von meinem Nexus 4 mit Tapatalk 2
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] ryanfsdf:
Smoothest kernel and most battery saving for me. I've tried Franco and faux on cm10. I'm getting some touch screen sensitivity issues though. I was fine before the kernel but now the pinch to zoom in my browser seems to be not as responsive as before
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] aletto:
random reboots. anyway, it wasn't the kernels fault, i just reflashed cm
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] trismegistos:
AW: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

I ran the kernel with cm nightly 14 till yesterday, no issues. Since yesterday matrix+slim and no issues, too. of you have a reboot again, please post a kmsg for us.

---------- Post added at 11:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:35 PM ----------

Do you use the default browser? Which rom? Do you mean double click or gesture (with 2 fingers)? Both work fine for me.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] IgnorCZ:
Feedback

Hi ..

I would like to post feedback from real life :D ... This kernel is The best ..... no lag (only when you swipe very quickly between widget in app drawer,this is the only one), games are perfectly smooth, device is much cooler than stock and battery .... I have no word :D

.. One question about thermal throttling .. I didn't find it in the forum so I want ask you .. when I run StabilityTest app and run Classic Stability Test ... all cores run flat out on 1,5 ... then couple of minutes later it goes little bit down .. ok I told myself that it's thermal throttling but (now thats the question) when you touch the screen all cores jump back to max .. so it can't be the thermal throttling ... by the way battery temp in that moment is in about 38 - 40 degrees celsius ..... and this about 2 minutes later become again ... it's not deal breaker .. I am wondering :) ...

... huge thanks for hard work !!!!!!

PS: I'm on stock rom and your last Gpu OC kernel .... most of the screen time was youtube .. than couple of mails .. game for a little moment .. so not heavy using .. brightness on minimum all the time and wifi all the time... thanks
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] trismegistos:
AW: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

Regarding the quick swiping in the app drawer. I use apex and there's no really lag, tried to swipe as much as I can. Of I use stock launcher I think I can reproduce it but it is a really little lag, right? In things of throttling mathkid should answer your question. What governor are you using?
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] IgnorCZ:
All stock so I think that its interactive ... yeah the lag is small ... ;) but it is the only thing what is bad .... but its nothing :)
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] trismegistos:
AW: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

Perhaps you want to try apex to compare of the lag is gone. Just to make sure it is the app drawer from stock launcher?
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] IgnorCZ:
Thanks I will try it ;)
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] netsyd:
Re: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

Anyone else still seeing msm_hsic_host wakelock being a problem? (This is today from 5.5)
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] sk3201:
AW: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

Not yet, but it will probably come back.

Gesendet von meinem Nexus 7 mit Tapatalk 2
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] trismegistos:
AW: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

The wakelocks are normal. Faux has some improvements for this. I talk to mathkid perhaps he implements them.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] sk3201:
AW: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

These are mine. Ondemand up threshold 98, max freq 1026

Gesendet von meinem Nexus 4 mit Tapatalk 2
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] trismegistos:
AW: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

15 mins are not that bad! Quiet normal behavior
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] sk3201:
AW: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

Yes, happy with it. Made also tests with trinity and had great display time and low hsic wake locks. Also with ondemand. Then switched to interactive and hsic wakelocks increased a lot. Maybe also due to my usage. Don't know why. But in general i guess nobody found out a reason for these wakelocks. Currently I'm happy with matrix. Thank you mathkid.

Gesendet von meinem Nexus 4 mit Tapatalk 2

Edit: hsic wakelock is 8m, not 15
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] grisha1:
AW: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

This is on WLAN. Problem is only with 3G.

by N4 via Tapatalk
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] trismegistos:
AW: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

Right
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] sk3201:
AW: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

Interesting, will test it.

Gesendet von meinem Nexus 4 mit Tapatalk 2
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] aletto:
Alright, I have two problems with this kernel 1. stability issues. I reverted the extra undervolting but harsh's kernel used to run fine. I'm still not exactly sure whether it's the kernel's fault or not but 2. is worrying me a lot. Occasionally I encounter display errors, mostly artifacts, even on the boot animation. Yesterday, when I opened the app drawer, the display switched extremely fast to the wallpaper and back and I wasn't able to stop it (had to reboot). Maybe it's a bug in the launcher (Apex), but I'd say it's the kernel.

I'm running AOKP with the non-gpu-oc version (actually, I'm still not sure whether it's the stock gpu frequency or 450 mhz)

I really don't want to abandon matrix ;( I've never had better battery life AND performance.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] trismegistos:
AW: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

To 1. How much do you under volt? 2. using apex too and no issue till now
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] SA-07:
Re: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

Ok, I will look into the wakelock stuff again and try to fix it!

Sent from my Nexus 4
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] aletto:
-50mV, totally stable with harshkernel
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] trismegistos:
AW: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

Of you set-50 on matrix, does out reboot directly or only in some specific use case?
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] cheech87:
Well matr1x is already uv'd by -100mv, so are you reducing it by an additional 50mv? or increasing it by 50mv to bring you up to -50?
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] aletto:
It reboots randomly. I didn't notice a pattern.

effectiv -150
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] trismegistos:
AW: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

Have you compared if all voltages are the same after y you set them on both kernels? I think there is one or more voltage different on a clock type and when it gets used it reboots. If you figure out which one it is you can adjust it.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] aletto:
AW: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

I'm 99% sure that they're the same
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] trismegistos:
AW: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

Please check the last 0.1%. I tested -50 on my phone. Till now no problems

---------- Post added at 08:37 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:55 PM ----------

now what's funny? if i set -50uv on harsh kernel my device reboots immediately :eek:
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] cheech87:
-150 is kind of steep. Try -100 and -125 and see if you can replicate the issue.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] trismegistos:
AW: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

Be careful here. -100 is default. Someone could understand this wrong and sets -100 on top ;)
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] SA-07:
Re: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

I'd like a phone that can handle that much :)

Sent from my Nexus 4
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] trismegistos:
AW: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

;)
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] persheshhater:
Re: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

How do you guys find out which apk is forbidding the device from going into sleep mode?
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] co.ag.2005:
Re: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

BetterBatteryStats app. Search XDA for the thread of the developer and downloads.

Sent from my Nexus 4
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] trismegistos:
AW: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

Like I told you, here is the answer from harsh.

Harsh;36966733]Because at some frequencies my kernel is uv more than -100 mv... So you can't do same uv as in other kernels which have exactly 100 mv uv across all.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] aletto:
AW: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

Wait, but that means I'm undervolting even more on harshkernel. That doesn't really help your argumentation, you know.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] trismegistos:
on the one hand you are right, but on the other, harsh has some lower voltages then matrix has and then you run into trouble (i wanted to show you that there ARE differences, becuase you said you are 99% sure that they are the same). again, the only way to figure out (and i am pretty sure there are voltage diffrence) is that you compare all voltages and see the difference. if you don't want that you have two options. only use -25uv with matr1x or leave it with -100 (the default setting). i don't believe that you will recognize any battery diffrence.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] aletto:
I just did a comparison. Matrix has a lot more steps, so I only compared the voltages of the frequencies they have in common and they're the same.

The problem is: Harshkernel runs completely stable whereas matrix doesn't. I'm going to try matrix again without any UV and if it's still unstable, then we know that UV was not the issue.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] trismegistos:
thx, sounds like a deal. since you are the only one who has the problems, i think you will not run into any trouble with the defualt -100uv.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] deltatux:
Just tried switching over to Matr1x Kernel but it seems like for some reason, with this kernel, it affects the haptic feedback, the vibration is a lot weaker than in Franco kernel. Was the haptic feedback driver changed in this kernel?

Cheers,

deltatux
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] samthe2can:
Re: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

Opposite way around, Franco increased his.

You can increase it on this kernel with Trickster mod though, I can't remember what value Franco's is though, I think it may of been 100... Don't hold me to that though.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] trismegistos:
AW: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

Franco has max setting 100,right
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] v-haker:
Yeah, samthe2can is right. You can change vibration power in Trickster MOD app. On Franco this value is 100%.

UPD. Sorry, didn't notice previous answer :p

Also, I got one issue on Matr1x. Sweep2Wake works at the second or third try. Does anyone else have such issue? Using stock firmware. Tried to reflash Matr1x, but it didn't help.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] SA-07:
Re: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

Don't worry, we are going to have PGM support soon ;)

Sent from my Nexus 4
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] Raphael17:
Paranoid Android

Sorry if this had been asked before but which one do I flash if I am on Paranoid Android? *Still a noob
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] samthe2can:
Re: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

Here is yesterdays achievement on Liquid Smooth.

WiFi most of the day, some 3g, auto brightness, full sync.

I'm very happy :D

Spoiler content hidden.

Edit: put it in spoiler tags to save some real estate.

Double edit: working on tapatalk but not on the browser... I give up.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] deltatux:
Thanks, that's exactly what I needed, weak vibrations drives me insane as I don't know if my finger hit a key properly or not lol.

deltatux
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] trismegistos:
AW: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

The non cm version
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] v-haker:
Niiice! :D Waiting for new version! ;)
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] jarjar124:
Re: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

It works
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] aletto:
I asked this before but I never received an answer, so I'll repost it (again).
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] SA-07:
Re: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

Yep

Sent from my Nexus 4
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] v-haker:
A few hours ago I found another bug. The screen doesn't lock while making calls. It turns off but not lock. I tried several times, but still the same. It's a pity, becuase I like Matr1x kernel the most. Hope you can solve this in next version :fingers-crossed:
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] ceejay83:
Re: [KERNEL] *Matr1x* v5.5 | JB - 4.2/4.2.1

You sure it's the kernel? This doesn't happen with other kernels?
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] v-haker:
Oh, I found out what happend. I'm sorry, it's my mistake. I didn't notice that my nexus was in the horizontal position, so proximity sensor was turned off. Thats not the kernel, excuse me for my mistake.