yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] :
AW: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

Ouh yeah, beat that guys!

Seriously though, how do i fix this?
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] :
AW: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

Is this the interface you are talking about?
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] ceroglu:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

Try to change it on there? It doesn't look like you have supersu permission. When I try to change it on there, mine reverts back to 600mv.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] franciscofranco:
The minimum is 750mV. I don't know what happens if that isn't met. I guess I need to add some defensive programing... sigh.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] :
AW: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

Is there a reason to have that minimum? If people can have it stable with less, why not allow it?
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] veyka:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

Krait is not A15 based, its qcoms custom implementation of the ARMv7 instruction set, somewhere between A9 and A15 in terms of performance.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] franciscofranco:
Thats what I set in the regulator limits. Because I know what happens with less knowledgeable users when they have too much power. I won't lower it more than 700mV.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] :
AW: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

Hm. I understand your reasoning here, but even with a 750 limit it's easy to **** up the phone completely. Maybe not with the 384mhz step but with the higher ones definately. So in the end the limit doesn't really make sense, does it? Or am i missing something here?
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] icemasta31:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

PowerManagerService wakelock is destroying my battery based on BBS.

Anyone know which app that could be?
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] KyraOfFire:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

In simple term, it is the collective of partial wake locks. Look at those.

Sent from my Nexus 4 in a Faraday cage
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] iammudd:
Just a heads up. There is a new SuperSU in play store. When I allowed it to update, the N4 crashed. (Perhaps I was in app that required root? I don't recall now.) When I tried to go into franco app, it stalled... because none of the updates succeeded (edit: so I didn't realize that the original SuperSU was already deleted and the app was waiting for root.)

edit: the update didn't cause the crash. I made another post to describe my mistake. http://xdaforums.com/showpost.php?p=37317267&postcount=9637
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] alanwyl:
Suddenly when a new feature came out, people start experimenting them. It's good.

But somehow it changed to some kind of primary school comparison. Ha mine is lower, mine is even lower.

When somebody pointed out with some stats, that it may have a side effect due to the mother of nature.

People will start saying, that's not true. Sample size is small. Look at me, I can do better, forgetting the sample size of his is still one.

Then, again they start pushing the limit again.

Big daddy came out and said that he will ground you based on your behavior, then kids start saying you don't have the right to do so.

This goes on and on until someone starts crying how he ****ed up his phone and blame everybody.

Not pointing to any particular user but this is what I saw in the last few pages.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] JNewms:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

Mine updated just fine ..

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] drawde40599:
Updated fine for me about 8 hours ago. No crash., Franco's app and Google Wallet also updated just fine, that was something on your end that failed
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] iammudd:
Yes, I think I might have been in an app that was requesting root. I wasn't suggesting that the kernel or any app caused the crash. I just wanted to point out that if SuperSU is missing, then some apps might stall (waiting for root without any other notifications). I *was* able to install SuperSU without any other changes afterwards.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] drawde40599:
O i c, i must have misunderstood u, Sorry. But ya if root app is missing any app that depends on root will fail
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] richteralan:
No. Every chip is different. There's no clear cut "should be xxxmV" answer.

I've tested mine with StabilityTest and found no issues.

---------- Post added at 10:58 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:57 PM ----------

It started WAY back with Battery and screen on times.

---------- Post added at 10:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:58 PM ----------

Now you know the importance of fool-proof.

But at the same time you can't be really fool-proof, they are too creative.:laugh::eek:
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] Godaemon:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

Fast chip here want to try these voltages but is there a program that we can check the stability running these settings the last hour only thanks!
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] danillll:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

In reply to:

'''

Hey guys, I had something odd happen today. I noticed at the end of my work day that my battery was at 11% when it is usually somewhere around 35 to 40%. When i went into the battery stats screen I saw that maps and phone where unusually high. It looks like my phone thought the GPS was enabled and running for hours (I used it for roughly 20 minutes and disabled it when through) and the phone app kept the phone awake for 5+ hours after a 2 minute phone call. The only thing I've done is install cm 1/27 nightly (updated from a few nightlies back) and update Franco's kernel from 34 to the newest 53. I posted in the cm thread as well to see if i can find any help there too. Can anyone think of a reason why these two apps would be acting like this?

Thanks in advance.

'''

I have ran into this issue when using tasker to enable disable GPS when maps is launched. It's a cosmetic issue , at least for me it was not draining the battery, only the GPS counter kept was running and it caused false positive results in the battery usage info. You can lookup my posts and threads for more into. Posted in cm thread and created its own thread. But yeah, this is not a kernel issue, most likely an android framework bug or maps bug.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] franciscofranco:
If it didn't crash what more stability do you need?
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] irishtexmex:
I, too, had & noticed this exact same thing today.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] Godaemon:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

Well I thought that you have to do a stability test like PC overclocking etc :)
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] drawde40599:
61

Im really really liking 61 with settings u mentioned yesterday , haven't had any issues at all, using 100% your settings besides min set to 486

Thanks franco
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] iammudd:
An update, the superSU update was not the cause of the above crash. Hopefully *my* mistakes may benefit someone else who is UV'ing:

The crash was caused by too much UV.... After making my settings, I used CPUspy to verify that the N4 was still functioning at each cpu freq for a few minutes each. I ran this setting the entire day. What I failed to test was unplugging from USB.

The problem was I also had llama perform a series of tasks when USB was unplugged -- disable WiFi, play a notification, etc. -- which combined with the drop in power from USB triggered the crash. Backing off UV by 25 solved the issue. So it's worthwhile testing usb / charger disconnects before making a permanent setting.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] danillll:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

Check cm thread, it's been identified as an issue with cm http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/29349/ the fix is in singleshot a 2 lines code change, but it's delayed by other fixes in the patch set, keep an eye on the patch or use the cm bits that somebody compiled with the code change in the cm thread.

I guess we are getting out of topic in this thread, any additional discussion should go in the cm thread.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] drawde40599:
My data also seems better with 61 haven't had any playstore fails, or issues with twitter loading pictures . Probably nothing to do with 61 but was having issues for while now so ill thank u anyways :P
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] whitedragonz83:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

GPS wakelocks can occur randomly I found. Today likely was due to the very cloudy and foggy sky for me. A reboot fixes this. Sometimes a force stop on maps and then relocating myself on Google maps afterwards will fix it too.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] Codekrypt:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

Yea that went well. Thing is I wasn't even trying to get good battery life, just a usual day. And Great work Sir, thanks. Yup I will UV today, got a fast binned chip so hoping for about - 150mV or something around that.

For people asking I used Franco's tunables he posted earlier on yesterday.

Sent from my Nexus 4
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] shilent:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

Which app is this that shows CPU usage while gaming?
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] Codekrypt:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

PerfMon by Chainfire. Free on XDA, paid on the Play Store.

Sent from my Nexus 4
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] franciscofranco:
I'm really impressed, after 17 hours of being out of the charger my device has 74% battery left with roughly 1h 20m screen on time which is pretty good for me considering my daily usage. The big question in my mind right now is: do we really need hotplugging?
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] realfelix:
AW: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

I dont think so. My device doesnt produce any more heat than before. Its just that smooth.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] Codekrypt:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

Wow that's great. I had about 83% yesterday with about 45 mins screen on time.

I don't think we need it to be honest.

Sent from my Nexus 4
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] noneabove:
13 hours on

5 hours awake

30 minutes of screen off music

2 hours 45 minutes screen on

8 hours wifi

auto brightness

51% left, not bad :)

also TONS of texts haha
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] drawde40599:
If its removed on 61 then no, ive never had a phone run this smooth, fast, cold, stable and ive had as many as u have :P man i wanna c what u can do with OC ;)
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] Luigiesin:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

No hotplugging man! This is working better than ever without it! :)

ROM: MINCO v5 N7

Kernel: Franco r25

T-Mobile USA
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] garets10:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

Hi i just got my nexus 4 and flashed the latest nightly what are the best color settings to make the screen look more vivid i guess ? ..

Enviado usando mi Nexus 4 usando xda premium
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] franciscofranco:
I really doubt that I'm gonna add OC. Its not a dead possibility though, just not something I feel being needed.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] richteralan:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

Since the SoC is designed to scale up to 1.7GHz, I think it will be great if the interface can be added, and of course limit to max 1.7
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] noneabove:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

I'm under clocked and I've never seen it show. Nothing kills the performance, especially with all four cores on always
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] Codekrypt:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

Hmm won't be a bad idea to add it later. If UV has had no people complaining then OC shouldn't as well. Anyways not something we need immediately. Thanks.

Sent from my Nexus 4
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] alanwyl:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

Franco, I am trying to be lazy, will your recommended settings be in the upcoming (test) build?
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] persheshhater:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

Having all cores on all the time, does it harm the cpu or no? Just wondering
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] icepuente:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

Yep. Franco wants all of our phones to break. :confused:
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] drawde40599:
Oh i no its not needed, but sure would be nice to have the options GPU/CpU ;)
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] franciscofranco:
The interactive ones? Yes. Next build won't be a test one though, should be normal nightly labeled.

No, why should it?
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] drawde40599:
Nope, not a chance
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] franciscofranco:
GPU not at all, thats something that I don't consider, period.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] persheshhater:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

Idk lol just like that came to my mind

---------- Post added at 07:34 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:33 AM ----------

I know franco wont break our phones:)
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] franciscofranco:
Thats what I want everyone to think... until... someday... :angel:
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] erikwervo:
ahh cmon Franco man, u already took away 1 core out of our nexus4. in manual it says nexus 4 is quadcore. but u label the core as cpu core 0, 1, 2 and 3. so its only 3 then!!! and you planning on destroy all of them someday? c'mon mann.. :p
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] zephiK:
Thats not Francos doing. In normal programming it is known to start with 0 rather than a 1.

array[0], array[1]... etc.

I know it was sarcasm, but still :p
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] techmatlock:
Franco, I bought your app for the hard work and consistent improvements to the device. The only complaint I have about contributing to you is sometimes I've seen you say to people, "That's the least of my worries" or, "I don't give a **** about that and don't plan on doing it". I get that some posts are either repetitive or non-contributing, but don't you think that the kernel should be based on the community and not only what you want to do?
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] zephiK:
What do you mean by based on the community? Franco takes a lot of feedback from the community and adapts his kernel accordingly. Without us as free alpha/beta testers, Franco Kernel wouldn't what it is today. At the end of the day, it's a free kernel, only paid option is the app which no one is forcing anyone to buy it because it works out of the box just fine and there are free alternatives available that may do the same thing (but may not work at the same time).

He also gets a lot of feedback/collaboration with other kernel developers. Not to mention, he also co-develops kernels for N10 and GN as well (N7). He only says that to responses that he deem to be 'redundant.'
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] noneabove:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

No, you see, Franco doesn't do this for us, hence why he doesn't charge us to use it. He makes a kernel that fits his needs, and since it would fit others too, he makes it open source and available to everyone for free with the option to donate if you feel so inclined. While he does listen to user feedback and reply to some requests, it's his choice entirely :)
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] ben_pyett:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

in a word, of say no.

If the community want to for example to OC yet Franco thinks that it's worthless and dangerous should he still do it.. Hell no.

Its his work, if you want to do something different to it out go on an alternative direction with it then download the source and change it yourself
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] drawde40599:
Since u started your post with i bought your app, u feel he owes u something now right?
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] franciscofranco:
Neither the kernel is based on the community or based on what I want to do. Theres a balance in between that I try to maintain. I'd do some things differently if it was only for me, and I'd do things differently if it was only for community. I have a priority list on my head that I don't break. Usually I'm right on what should be worked first and then later - my user base is big, it just speaks it itself ;) People can call me arrogant, but I listen to what the users say, I ask for feedback, I help on troubleshooting and I release test kernels. I don't do everything users ask me to or suggests me, but I take everything into consideration before making a decision.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] terranox:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

I just bought your application!! =)

Enviado desde mi Nexus 4 usando Tapatalk 2
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] nokkenas:
r53 battery test:

On mobile data I can get 20 hours uptime with 2 hours 18 minutes screen on time.

On Wifi I can get 23 hours uptime with 3 hours 59 minutes screen on time.

Brightness is on 19%.

Great job franco!
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] persheshhater:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

Franco what do you think of Mourinho?
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] ben_pyett:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

If the performance of 61 test is anything to go by then Franco s the special one !
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] bleuf1sh:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

Huh? I thought Conservative at 98 was the new kid on the block that everyone was loving?

sent from my r53-Franco nexus 4
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] franciscofranco:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

Best coach in the world.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] persheshhater:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

Hehe!:):):)
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] drawde40599:
Conservative and interactive is what we have been testing. There s settings posted for both, if u havent tryed interactive with posted settings man ur missing out ;)
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] bleuf1sh:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

I'll get to it soon probably. I was waiting to see everyone's experience from using the test kernel without hot plugging and all the cores on .... because it's such a radical shift from r53. Seems like most people are getting great results. :)

Does that mean conservative won't be the default?

sent from my r53-Franco nexus 4
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] techmatlock:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

No, I just don't kiss ass like half the people in this thread do. I tell it like it is and I just wanted some clarification that kind of bugged me. Now that a couple people who've responded, including Franco, I understand more of the structure of this development.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] persheshhater:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

There r many in this thread, thats true. (As an outside note lol)
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] trueblueram:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

The special one
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] Martin_Ro:
Some comments about r61 from my side:

1. I love it

2. I love it even more

3. Stop talking about tapatalk / XDA if you want to measure "smoothness" of the kernel. 99% of the lag's come from tapatalk and it's handling of images etc. You can easy verify this by loading a thread like this on 3G/Data and then on WiFi. You will see that the lag's on 3G are much bigger then on WiFi. If you want it even clearer: Use 2G only and then you know what really lags. Also you can see it when you first slowly scroll sometimes through the hole threadpage up and down till all images are loaded and cached. after that, the lags are much smaller, the rest is only due to the placing (and the way tapatalk realized that). You can easily verify this by scrolling through a long post that fills more then one page. As long as you scroll to text only, you don't have any lags. Only if there are Images, you got lag because the way, tapatalk works (I have a strong beleave, that it checks anytime if the Avatar or the image has changes even when it has loaded it some seconds earlier).

I have also this lags in Tapatalk but wouldn't complain about it as long as it don't get bigger between two builds (the only time a have observed such issue was back around r17-23). Scroll through titanium-backup save and restore list, and you have zero lags.

Have I allready mentioned that I love r61 ? :silly:

I use the interactive/deadline settings posted from franco and they are amazing. Don't look to much on battery time but would say they are equal to r53 :good:

Thank you so much franco, if I hadn't allready buyed your app, I would do it now at latest :victory:
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] drawde40599:
U didn't think deadline slowed it down on 61? On 50's deadline was badass but didn't get good results personally on 61 cfq seemed snapper

---------- Post added at 12:28 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:26 AM ----------

No clue what will be default i would think interactive but......? , i used interactive all day just switched over to conservative with I/O and gov recommend settings rest default, so far so good :P .
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] yoyoz808:
That's a good question. I liked the concept you were using for the hotplugging and the logic for it made perfect sense. Keeping all the cores online seems to actually do better for less power consumption. I think the hotplugging was the problem for the lag everyone was having but this why we have testing :) my opinion, we don't need hotplugging. I also want to add that I'm liking the conservative governor. Verry smoooth. Maybe this could be the new default.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] fkrone:
AW: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

Sometimes I experience some kinds of lags with r61 especially in keyboard (swyping around in Facebook Messenger) and a game (Subway Surfer). I did no undervolting. Governor is interactive, I/O schedule is deadline.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] Bar81:
After a day of testing, I have not discovered any bugs (finally) and battery life and performance are excellent with ondemand. This looks like the one to replace r23. Good work.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] Stretlow:
I've got £10 at 100/1 that he'll be the next manager of Manchester United, put it on when he "Left" Chelsea.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] Vangelis13:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

Oh man, you broke the rules. No religion, no politics, no football.. Mods aren't gonna like this.. :p

He's too arrogant. But, hey, he gets the silverware!

Win. :thumbup:
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] TeddyBeers:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

Just had 20% battery drop after single reboot on r61

What and how that happened.

Installed latest r61

Charged nexus on qi charge pad overnight.

At about 7:30 had 100% - which is unusual because always had 99% after qi charging.

At 8:51 done reboot - phone started up as always.

Than battery drops to 71% from about 92%

Done another reboot to check if bug still exist - - yes

Cleaned battery stats - - still nothing.

Can someone explain to me what happened?

How it's possible to lose 20% battery in one minute?

Should I attach any kind of log file?

Bellow is screenshoot which showing what happened.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] Vangelis13:
Re: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

^^ Known issue. Battery isn't really reported correctly on our n4. Hopefully 4.2.2 will fix it.
[Nexus 4 Original Android Development] Testraindrop:
AW: [KERNEL][GPL][N4] franco.Kernel - r53

Doubt it, had it on all devices I had, Google didn't bother to fix it until now, why should they now?

Had this bug the other way round yesterday. Rebooted 20>9, rebooted again 9>14:rolleyes:

Gesendet von meinem Nexus 4 mit Tapatalk 2