yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] chriseshearin:
Lol!

---------- Post added 3rd December 2012 at 12:00 AM ---------- Previous post was 2nd December 2012 at 11:58 PM ----------

Why do 60% of the people on here have to be d-bags? Sorry for the one's who actually contribute their time on here.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] kchen96:
I feel bad for the developers who are being rushed by people like you who don't even bother to read the 15 pages and realize that this is a major jump and will take a while longer. If you've been following the thread, you would know that they need to update the kernel to get it booting. Your welcome. D-bag
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] blackwing182:
actually is not a major jump, our cuernt CM10 libs and some propietary files works well on CM10.1, it just need a couple of Kernel eddits. just reed gerrit. and stay up 2 date in Cyanogenmod on google plus.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] sk8erwitskil:
Lol this is still very much in progress. All the work is being discussed in irc though.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] m4570d0n:
I wish I knew which mods to the kernel need to be made. I've seen the long list of commits for the d2. For many of them, I have no idea which ones are necessary for the msm8660, or where the changes might need some massaging. Would be nice to know top's general status. Not for an ETA, but if anyone wanted to pick up some of the work to help him out to get it done a little quicker, it would be good not to work on stuff he already finished but has not pushed to gerrit yet.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] car vs driver:
4.2 just dropped for the S3 via Kies ... anyone have a dump we can start playing with?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Deliberate:
For at&t? Or for a different carrier?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] stoopendis:
I have two friends here at work with S3s..is there a link to how to get a dump from the phone... I'll check first... We're in Canada so update may not be here yet.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] daviebeach:
For AT&T
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] blackwing182:
Its 4.1.1 not 4.2 -_- , i juts updated my friends Gs3
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] car vs driver:
Sweet, see if you can get them to do a dump via recovery ... in the meantime, I'm going to poke my head in the S3 forums tonight and see if they have it dumped already.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] stoopendis:
Ya this is correct. so...CVD...do you still want a 4.1.1 dump?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] car vs driver:
Crap. It isn't 4.2?

*facepalm*

Here's a linkey ... http://www.gottabemobile.com/2012/12/03/att-galaxy-s3-jelly-bean-update-available/

Anyway, sorry for the false alarm.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] softballjunkee13:
Lol. Had me excited
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] tkjeeper:
Yeah, it's 4.1.1, some reason no sphere camera?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] softballjunkee13:
Sphere is 4.2
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] xcrazydx:
Atta boy kchen! You're learning!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Deliberate:
so i was just browsing the net and i found this. im pretty sure know one has posted this but sorry if someone has... a list of phones who have andoid 4.2 up and running.

http://411droid.com/list-of-android-jelly-bean-roms-for-your-flashing-convenience/
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] ghassir:
Status?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] m4570d0n:
No idea. Out of boredom from the current building hiatus I started adding some of the commits that were merged from CAF to the d2 kernel over to our kernel but I have no idea where topprospect is at in his status or if I will be brickong my phone, should I try to compile this jazz when I finish.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] crt60:
I've been able to get successful builds, but my biggest problem is getting the video to work. Since google decided to add in their own qcom display driver, it needs to be rewritten to include msm8660 or celox. I'm sure one of these high powered devs are working on it, but not finding anything on the git or code aurora yet.

But I'm still working on it, and getting black screens...:eek:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] blackwing182:
This ia a UPDATE :) thanx! this would help alot
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] jobankler:
Then how come the HTC sensation got a working built(Display working) , from what i thought they both have the same msm8660 chip dont they?

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2017309
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] crt60:
He may have got the prebuilt driver libraries working, or has his own qcom code that is adreno 220 compatible. The skyrocket uses the msm8660 device source, since it is nearly identical to the msm8260 chipset, but the qcom google source is geared towards the msm8960.

I tried using the prebuilt libraries from 4.1.2 but still had the same problem with the blackscreen, so I don't know how he got it running. The qcom display code in the original 4.2.1 google source seems to be for the adreno 225, but not sure how much difference there is between the 220 and 225 gpu's. A pointer here, and integer there, I don't know enough about device hardware programming yet, so I hope someone can solve it soon...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] jobankler:
Yea maybe we should ask him too,cuz even they said their chip was not supported in 4.2 and we have the same story, so check his source code out, cuz he has a few things he changed about month ago(time of his release).
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] blackwing182:
if i remember right, we have this problem when 4.1 comes out, and it was fixed in the kernel, we need to keep an eye to code aurora forums and qualcomm site for the new adreno files that may work on 4.2.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] m4570d0n:
I already checked his github. Most of the changes he made are already present in the jellybean branch for device/samsung/msm8660-common and kernel/samsung/msm8660-common.The one exception I've seen so far is some changes he made to the framerate for different camera resolutions, which I highly doubt is our issue.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] jobankler:
have seen the source for the gpu? There are a few changes done https://github.com/bruce2728/android_kernel_htc_pyramid/tree/jellybean/drivers/gpu/drm

and is our kernel also upstreamed to linux 3.0.53?

Faux also been updating his source : https://github.com/faux123/msm8660-htc-ics
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] m4570d0n:
hey sk8,

I decided to update the kernel to 3.0.53 from CAF last night. There's no changes to any display drivers that might affect us from what I can tell but if anyone wants to play around with it, have at it. I doesn't look like that Bruce guy did anything to the htc msm8660 kernel to get it working with 4.2, as his last kernel update was before 4.2 came out. Still don't know what the difference is.

https://github.com/M4570D0N/android_kernel_samsung_msm8660-common/tree/jb-testing
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] roger_n:
I built using your jb-testing branch and it built without errors, but the image doesn't boot at all. The samsung logo flashes and that’s it adb does not see the device so no logcat. Thanks for providing the test branch I'm sure it will come in handy in the near future.

EDIT: adb may be working I just noticed adb is broken on my system. I already installed a nandroid backup so I don't know for sure, maybe I'll give it another try later to see if I can capture some logs.

Thanks Roger:cool:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] m4570d0n:
sent a message to bruce. This was his reply:

I guess that's one option to try. I dunno if that gralloc.msm8660.so file might be any different in the Skyrocket JB 4.1.2 UCLK4 leak or if it would make any difference.

Speaking of which, has anyone tried a build with these cherry picks?

qcom display: Bring back pmem/ashmem

display: add things covered by QCOM_ICS_COMPAT

display: allow disabling of HDMI out for devices which don't support it

display: Add option to disable MSMFB_OVERLAY

display: Add option to disable hardware VSYNC
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] blackwing182:
there is a hiden place that we are lossing, what really can be going wrong? im going to ask cyanogen or topp or even mike, maeby we can hellp who knows
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] m4570d0n:
I was able to get a logcat when I tried to boot. Lots of errors haha.

https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B0bpxu46xkWSX2hBREhsTnZuM3c
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] roger_n:
@m4570d0n

Did you include this cherry-pick in your last build http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/c/27131/ I'm not sure if it will help but it's worth a shot. If you don't get to it first I'll try it this evening.

Roger:cool:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] softballjunkee13:
Wow. God bless u devs. I don't understand one word of that. Lol

:D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] fordstang99:
Haha that makes 2 of us
[Nexus 7 General] jptech:
will the dock be arriving soon?

Also, look at daydream in display settings.
[HTC One S] ballooneh:
I have the latest AOKP. The problem is that I can't send or retrieve picture messages. Anyone else have the same problem?
[HTC One S] potatoesryum:
I had this problem as well when I was using the latest blackbean rom
[HTC Desire S] mayurh:
hi Everyone

why is the htc Saga not getting any Cm official nightlies ? 9 or 10?

We got official ics( via ruu) and kernel sources?
[HTC Desire S] sbsbsb123:
why don't you use other roms like jelly time and nk111's
[HTC Desire S] mayurh:
tried pacman which is a combination

how stable are those roms? is everything working?

i seen a few issues

but anyways.still wondering why no official cm nightlies?
[HTC Desire S] amidabuddha:
Because to have official support it has to be out of Alpha/Beta stage. In other words it has to be completely stable on hardware level (kernel and proprietary binaries) before it can be included in the main repo and build with only CM not device changes. CM devs will not bother to fix device stuff, only OS related. So if you are reading the CM10 threads you will know that we are far from that still. It may be working but not for all (example the hitachi panel users). Until this is fixed - no official support.
[HTC Desire S] mayurh:
thanks for the explanation dude

appreciate it. now i understand

i always thought the cm guys do the work them selves to get everythign working correctly.guess i was wrong

so our devs have to get it stable first.then they add it
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] mjrifath:
Guys,

Could you suggest me a app to backup/restore my account setting since each time i flash a new rom need to be done it manually.

Thanks
[Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] kriskras:
Try MyBackup Root from store.

Respect!
[HTC Droid DNA] NorthlandAZ:
The new Beats Pill for HTC DROID DNA. Not sure what the cost is, but I'll ask.
[HTC Droid DNA] ilive12:
The pill costs $200, but I'm sure you could get a lot better portable speaker for a lot less. Beats are known for bad audio quality, ask any expert in audio.
[HTC Droid DNA] SwiftLegend:
Since they have the name 'Dre' on them, people assume they must be amazing. I've tried my friend's Beats with my own music (The Strokes actually) and it sounded bad. It sounded like the music was being played from a distance. The headphones Samsung included with the GN sound 10 times better imho
[HTC Droid DNA] ShayonX:
Honestly....Beats is the most over rated Audio Brand in the Industry....I am pretty sure the pill will also be one such

Ultra Hyped product which eventually will yield very poor sound quality...
[HTC Droid DNA] amaroth:
Beats aren't that bad they are just overpriced. Real audiophiles know better :)
[HTC Droid DNA] alunet:
strange thing.. i think its bad sound
[HTC Droid DNA] Mooselips:
I 've been using it for about 2 weeks. It's fine. Just don't expect a $500-800 sound from this or any other no matter how awesome speaker for $200. The Pill is decent IMO. I have Beats Studio too. Maybe you wanna call me Beats fan, IDK... I like the headphones a lot. I know everybody says Beats are overpriced. Maybe, IDK, but they are not bad.
[HTC Droid DNA] boushidosan:
How good does this phone sound with beats audio? Also does the 2.55v driver kick it without the phone being plugged up?
[HTC Droid DNA] Spaded21:
I picked this Logitech bluetooth speaker from Amazon. At the time it was $115 with a $50 giftcard to the Amazon MP3 store. Sound is great.

http://www.amazon.com/Logitech-984-000181-Bluetooth-Wireless-Speaker/dp/B005KQ2O26/
[HTC Droid DNA] :
Real audiophiles don't listen to MP3 audio through a phone.
[HTC Droid DNA] revolutionz_s13:
Actually, the DNA (with the beats turned off) plus Neutron music player doesnt sound half bad on my Shure SE215's. Waiting for my Westone 4's to get here to give it a real test though. I think the amp they put in the phone plus some decent software might do OK, and keep me from carrying a seperate player. Still, not going to be as good as running a headphone amp or a hifiman mp3 player....
[HTC Droid DNA] jonjvaughn:
Would it be safer to say "Real audiophiles don't listen to MP3 audio period"? I don't make the claim to be one but the HD Tracks I get in flac format top any MP3s I have. The problem gets back to one of storage size.
[LG Optimus G (International)] Snow_fox:
First: do the at&t and sprint versions use the same case?

Second: Are there any cases out for at&t yet if the answer to the first question is no?
[LG Optimus G (International)] Digil:
I don't know the answer to the first question. The second answer is the AT&T store has two cases available, a Body Glove case and a Belkin bumper. Otterbox also has a case coming out that looks pretty nice. http://www.otterbox.com/LG-Optimus-...us-g_color=20&start=1&cgid=lg-optimus-g-cases Not sure what variant that Otterbox case if for though. Apparently Best Buy also has a RocketFish case available.
[LG Optimus G (International)] Rocket_Science:
1st question: No. They're slightly different shaped and I think the camera is in a different spot.
[LG Optimus G (International)] JasonJoel:
Correct. I use the bumper case with my att lg og, and really like it. Although it completely covers the power button, thus making the notification light unusable.
[LG Optimus G (International)] Snow_fox:
I'll check best buy when I go to buy.
[HTC One X] mr.dj26:
Hi guys,

just wondering if its possible to run a CM rom or and other non-sense rom with HTC camera.

I like to use CM but the camera app sucks.

thanks..
[HTC One X] tomascus:
not possible, not happening
[HTC One X] shinigamikris:
Is it possible to make a new one that is as good as the sense one???
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] miniura:
Hey all,

I'm trying to compile my own ROM of ParanoidAndroid from source following a guide on their official site. Anyway, I need to find device specific trees, can anyone please help me out?

The guy gave an example for his S3:

Thanks
[Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] cistamlaka:
Wait,do u have galaxy s3 i9300(quad core,4.8 screen) or galaxy s1(single core,4 inch screen)?
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] babyarm85:
does anybody know what kind of plastic Samsung uses on the stock/default screen protector? I have looked at about 8 or 9 different so called "screen protectors" and they all have that "rubbery" or soft plastic feeling to them. the original one has the "galaxy note 2" logo and web address at the bottom and it is annoying but I like the way the original feels. so smoooooth.........

I rode my galaxy s epic 4g bareback for over two years all the way from froyo to jellybean. would be nice to find a screen protector that is smooth.

maybe I just have high hopes but I am hoping for the best. thanks in advance for anyone that helps or attempts to help.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] PsycloneTW:
Agree with you on the rubbery feel to most protectors, e.g. Invisishield, Phantom Skinz, etc. If you want one like the protector that comes on the phone then check out http://www.spigen.com/cell-phone/sa...note-2-screen-protector-steinheil-series.html. I have had their protectors on my GS2 and GS3 and will not use anything else, good protection with the feel of glass. Be advised that it takes a few days or so for the shield to 'loosen' up. At first it feels kind of 'sticky' but I think that's due to the manufacturing process but after some use(I presume after it gets some oils from your skin on it), it feels just like glass. Best protector IMO and I'm not alone in that opinion.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] babyarm85:
thanks. so what sub-choice would you recommend? ultra crystal, ultra fine, ultra oleophobic, or ultra optics? and does it have the same feel as the default screen protector that comes with the phone? sorry if I sound a little picky but I have spent well over $200 in screen protectors trying to get that "smooth" feel.

I really wish someone knew what type of plastic was used for the default screen protectors. when I called Samsung they were like "uuhhhh, I don't know".
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] Jcossack88:
Also, would be interested in figuring this out...I heard the Zagg protectors suck with device (along with all other wet application protectors). Anyone with a Spigen care to comment?
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] Deltatko:
In my experience the cheap ones from ebay are the best. They are smooth and if it peels up (which I've never had happen in 2 years) or you don't get it on perfect, you probably got 5 for $5 anyway so it is not a big deal.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] 00mred00:
This. Look for PET protectors. That or is all I buy....ttypically you can get tons of them for cheap on ebay
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] threestripebrand:
Here's what I use, and can't even tell there's anything there, and it doesn't effect the span functionality at all. I'm still on the first one. I bought a spigen ultra clear while waiting for these because I thought the shipper was was drop shipping the from china but they need up getting to me the next day which was like 6 days total I think. Needless to say I'll be selling the spigen when I get it.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/6x-Premium-...-Samsung-Galaxy-Note-II-2-N7100-/370669378143
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] linzgeneral:
I have a Spigen ultra clear as I did on my EVO LTE. The screen protector is really easy to apply with no wet application necessary. They look crystal clear, you cant even tell its there, and the only thing is that you have to wipe off fingerprints every now and again, which is the case with any screen protector. The screen protector feels great to the touch and does not affect the S-pen or sensors in any way that I can tell. I must warn that the screen protector does cover the whole screen but not necessarily the whole glass surface as there is probably a millimeter or two left uncovered on each side. It really is not noticeable or any thing to worry about. In my opinion, this screen protector is far superior to the cheap ones, which in themselves aren't too bad.

I recently sold my EVO LTE and the guy was shocked that there was a screen protector on the phone as he could not tell. He commented later that he didn't even know that they sold screen protectors that you could not see....lol....
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] babyarm85:
threestripebrand, that looks almost like the default protector without the note 2 logo. is it sort of a harder smooth plastic? not like the rubbery feel ultra soft/flexible ones? because if so i'll order as soon as I get confirmation from you.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] threestripebrand:
No zagg rubbery feel at all. Not even noticable. You wont be disappointed.
[Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note II] babyarm85:
Thanks! Just ordered it.
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] rslink:
I'm on 4.1.2 stock and wanted to update to 4.2, however I can't get to the recovery. First attempts: Turn n7 off, vol down + power, etc.., boot recovery: It then switches to the google logo (and this device is unlocked), screen flashes to black, google logo again, and it starts to boot normally. I've googled the problem found some things about needing a usb connected to a computer tried it didn't work, tried using a app to boot to recovery, didn't work. I used a toolkit to flash twrp recovery (and tired cwm later on), tried to boot into recovery again both manually and with a app, same thing happened.

Anyone have any idea what is going on?
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] irishrally:
The booting into recovery bug should be fixed in 4.1.2. Have you tried booting into the bootloader by holding both volume up and down and the power button at the same time when the phone is off? From there you can use the volume button to scroll to recovery and select it with the power button. If that doesn't work then you may have other issues. The custom recoveries may not have flashed with the toolkit or may have been over written on a reboot with stock recovery. You might try flashing twrp using fastboot and rename the recovery-from-boot file. http://www.teamw.in/project/twrp2/103
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Menthix:
I am having the same issue.

First noticed something was wrong when Android asked me to update to 4.2 (OTA). I allowed the update and the device rebooted, only to come back in 4.1.2 without any sign of the update. Then I tried to do the update manually, but I can't seem to enter recovery mode in any way.

Things I tried:

* Boot while holding volume up + volume down -> Select Recovery Mode

* Boot while holding volume up + volume down and connected to a PC -> Select Recovery Mode

* Use Quick Boot to enter Recovery Mode

* Use Rom Manager to enter Recovery Mode

* Flash ClockworkMod Recovery through Rom Manager

* Flash ClockworkMod Touch through Rom Manager

* Flash TWRP Touch Recovery through Google Nexus 7 Toolkit

Each time I try to enter the Recovey Mode it will: Show the Google logo and the open padlock symbol for a few seconds -> Screen turns off -> Google logo and the open padlock symbol again -> Nexus logo -> Booted in normal mode. Seems like something errors when attempting to enter Recovery Mode and then it just boots normally.

I attempted the method on http://www.teamw.in/project/twrp2/103. Booting while holding down volume down will boot to FASTBOOT MODE, but the secreen does not say FASTBOOT USB when connecting it to a PC. I have the USB drivers from Google Nexus 7 Toolkit installed, do I need other drivers?
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Sim2:
EDIT: So I finally got a custom recovery installed by doing a "fastboot flash recovery" of the latest TWRP (2.3.1.1) from here: http://teamw.in/project/twrp2/103

Neither of the current CWM recoveries (6.0.1.0) would work for me.

You are not alone. Same thing has happened to me. I manually flashed the 4.2 OTA zip yesterday from CWM and while that went fine, I have been unable to re-install a custom recovery ever since. I tried flashing CWM and TWRP from toolkit multiple times. I also did a manual fastboot flash of a newly download CWM but I am getting the same results as you. Nexus 7 will not boot into a custom recovery no matter what.

On the plus side, 4.2 is working well..... Would really like to get root back though.
[Nexus 7 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting] Menthix:
That actually does work, but I just didn't have any idea what I was doing first. Got it to work now.

If you are like me:...

* Before you go into fastboot/bootloader, get CWM-SuperSU-v0.98.zip and place it on your sdcard.

* Go to http://teamw.in/project/twrp2/103

* Download openrecovery-twrp-2.3.1.1-grouper.img

* Put it in the 'put_img_files_to_flash_here' folder of Google Nexus 7 Toolkit

* Boot while holding volume up + volume down and connected to a PC

* Start Google Nexus 7 Toolkit

* Select option 11

* Type the openrecovery-twrp-2.3.1.1-grouper.img filename

* Once it is done pushing the file to the phone, boot from it

* You can now install CWM-SuperSU-v0.98.zip to get root on 4.2