yashsingh1/xdaforums huggingface dataset:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] jobankler:
Does htc sensation have the new kernel? if they do we can probally fork it
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] m4570d0n:
nope. That's why it's really confusing/frustrating that I can't figure out so far why display and some other stuff is working on the Sensation/Pyramid but not the Skyrocket/Hercules. It also feels like all the real devs (topprospect, mikeyman77, Whitehawkx) have all gone MIA since the mr1-staging branches were created.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] krazeecracker:
Current cm10.1 devices. Might help?

https://github.com/CyanogenMod/hudson/blob/master/cm-daily-build-targets
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] blackwing182:
its rare how a bad developmen phone like sensation have a working build. we can now see how good our devs are, sorry but even putting donations this development will be slow, and we wont get a build until jan
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] krazeecracker:
What makes you say Jan?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] blackwing182:
i need to look more deep here before that lol, but i know we did not looked in the right place, our phone is now legacy.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] litshredder:
And its not like they have real funding to do this. Its some spare time work. And its great work at that.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] blackwing182:
github.com/bruce2728

sensation kernel source

the one used when the first cm10.1 rom was build with working display.

kernel version 3.0.52
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] softballjunkee13:
Is that a way of saying our devs are no good?

:thumbdown::thumbdown:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] blackwing182:
i mean slow if you keep reading down, its a hard work i know, but most of devices have a cm10.1 on the line, if you misunderstood the msg sorry for you.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] car vs driver:
We'll get it ... just takes time. What I think should happen is for us to pull together see who wants to work on which pieces. There is a lot to this, one single person cannot do it all.

I'm just about done the nibbles kernel, plus I'm off work next week so I can divert some of my attention to this then. At least, that's the plan ...
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] blackwing182:
i agree , is to much work for only one person, if we are going to put our hands in this, we should know how are working on XXX part and start to put pices together.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] jobankler:
We have one of the best devs! Its just that we need a kernel update and for that we need new source, so no matter how good of Dev you can be its just not a easy task to come up with. But cherry picking from maybe other drives source may help but still every kernel is extremely specific for that device. Some Samsung official source is really need here.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Deliberate:
Man...... now the f'ing captivate has cm10.1 12/20 build. Sucks!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Deliberate:
Can we take anything helpful out of the kernel for the http://get.cm/?device=i9100g or the http://get.cm/?device=i777 They now have cm10.1
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] litshredder:
It amazes me how this model gets less attention than others. The phone is already down the economical pole (hell I saw adverts for the GSIV already) yet this phone keeps up w the rest. I'm proud of my skyrocket. I'll get my hands dirty on this. Its time I got into working on my phone.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] m4570d0n:
Yes, that was already posted a week or so ago. That's just the jellybean (cm10.0) kernel though. He hasn't really done anything to the kernel since 4.2 was released other than pull in a few updates from the linux kernel. I already did that for our kernel as well (up to linux kernel version 3.0.56), but still no dice. That's why this has been rather frustrating/confusing. I don't know what else he did to get it to work, but it was something other than just the kernel. The bigger issue is with hardware_qcom_display and hardware_qcom_audio in the cm-10.1 branch, as it's totally redone around the msm8960, and from what I can tell, CM has not added support for the msm8660 yet.

The sgh-i9100g has a TI OMAP4430 SoC, and the sgh-i777 (and the i9100) has a Samsung Exynos 4210 SoC. Different hardware from different manufactures, and use different kernels (different from ours as well as from each other).
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Deliberate:
Poop. Well Idk much about development. I just trying to research as much as I can. Hoping to contribute something useful. But sorry it didn't help! :(
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] blackwing182:
dis you check the qualcomm page for the msm8660 new display drivers?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] 26.2man:
I have both phones. Flashed it on my captivate tonight. I cant believe for such an early nightly how smooth it runs. Makes me really unhappy that we don't have it for our Skyrockets yet. I will just have to be patient I guess.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] m4570d0n:
Well, I tried a few more things and made another build last night. Still no go. About to head out of town until probably New Year's and won't have my computer with me. Hopefully when I get back CM will have made some progress that I can look forward to. :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] blackwing182:
is this added to BoardConfigcommon.mk?

BOARD_USES_QCOM_HARDWARE := true

if yes never mind lol!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] sebo1084:
Merry Christmas devs! Thanks for all the hard work. Hope you all get to spend time with families and not worry over these little machines so much!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] jobankler:
Any updates from top respect?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] whosgotlag:
I hope not; it's the holidays!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Deliberate:
So found this in the t989 forum. It may help?

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2069954
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] bearclaw7380:
They will get this to boot. Too many minds are wrapped around for it not to. It's just a matter of time.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] jobankler:
Ok guys i messaged bruce (who got working 10.1 from htc sensation and shares same chip with us) and asked for his help and this was his reply
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] ktempleton:
So my phone uses the msm8660 also and i was wondering if the changes you guys have made to get it to compile would be the same ones i would have to make?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] jobankler:
I would look at the htc sensation since its booting
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] ktempleton:
Thanks but i have to get past recovery image error 1. I think at the beginning i removed a part where it says to put something about a ramdisk offset and now i think it's come back
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] spitfire2425:
Any news? Our should we just expect living with 4.1.2?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] onlychevys:
Time for a Nexus or GSIII
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] m4570d0n:
I'm taking a break for the time being. I'm not a programmer and this requires more work that is beyond my current knowledge. Unfortunately, I can't seem to find any evidence anywhere of any of the more capable devs working on this at all. Until then, or until the CM team decides to port 4.2 to the msm8660, it looks like we shouldn't hold our breath on this. :(
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] car vs driver:
I'm with you man, this is certainly beyond my abilities. The SR is a dying phone, and dare I say, a legacy platform. It's a shame because it does have some pretty good hardware and can keep up a lot of the newer phones on the market.

The cream of the crop developers will always be on the newest and greatest devices, that's to be expected.

I really don't see what all the fuss is about 4.2 anyway. Granted, it's what 4.1 should've been all along. But I don't see any compelling reasons that we absolutely have to have it. Sure, it might be a little faster and smoother, but there are some pretty good home brew ROMs that make up for that :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] softballjunkee13:
+1 to that. I posted a comment on one of the first few pages of this thread. I got it on my nexus 7 and its really nothing to pitch a tent about. HONESTLY
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] tommyjt24:
4.2 apps

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=1966302

4.2 apps work on skyrocket... I have only tested cam\gallery but others i think have used more

using cm10, latest nightly
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] dakpluto:
Seriously, only part of 4.2 that would be good on the phone is the lock screen widgets, and even it feels like it could have been done much better.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Deliberate:
+1
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] spitfire2425:
Its sad really, it's a great device with fairly good hardware that probably deserves to keep going on. I find it weird that the old phones like the captivate or any of its galaxy relatives or phones like the original evo get more attention than our phone... :sigh: :(
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] mtdew:
The hd2 refuses to die and continues to learn new tricks like triple booting now. I would love to see our phone get this one last hoorah before calling it legacy lol.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] spitfire2425:
So would the rest of us but I doubt we'll get that.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] bearclaw7380:
A little late to the game, are we? We've been doing that for a while. Even a few threads exist as well.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Wesley32:
Why can't the skyrocket at least dual boot? Even the Motorola droid bionic can quad boot. Sad sad sad :(
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] car vs driver:
It isn't that it can't ... it's just nobody has actually sat down to do it.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] adelvillar:
It will take some time as the JB builds from codeaurora started appearing on Dec 19.

You can check the progress here https://www.codeaurora.org/gitweb/quic/la/?p=platform/vendor/qcom/msm8660_surf.git;a=summary

At least platform sources are available for this one and you are not on the hot mess that Exynos4 is.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] softballjunkee13:
What's that mean to triple boot or quad boot?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] merlen:
Allows the phone to boot into more than one rom.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] LawStud3nt:
So has anyone figured out what's up with it no building our modules?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Deliberate:
I saw your post in the t989 forum and was wondering if your source for cm10.1 was good to go? And if it would help us out here?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] LawStud3nt:
Its a work in progress but will help. We need to get the /hardware/qcom/display folder sorted out.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] m4570d0n:
I just noticed today that helicopter88 has 4.2 running now (AOKP and Evervolv) on the Evo 3D (which also uses the msm8660).

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2089270

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2073403

And I happened to catch some recent msm8660 related work being done for cm-10.1 on a few github repos here:

https://github.com/Team-Hydra

https://github.com/Andromadus
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] bearclaw7380:
Awesome! This looks like we have a winner!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] deandre3001:
YEAHHH lol sorry about the caps but this is the second best thing i have seen today. First was the scandal show.. big thanks to our devs on here YOUUUUUUUUUUUU guys are simply the best
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] roger_n:
I shared your post with the guys on Teamchopsticks IRC and mikeyman77 pointed out that it looks like the kernel is a prebuilt one so it won't help we still need the source.

https://github.com/Evervolv/android_device_htc_shooteru/tree/jellybean/prebuilt

Roger:cool:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] jobankler:
Cant someone get a hold of one of them for the source?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Koragg618:
Can you guys check an error we're getting on the T-Mobile forum?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Phatboyj420:
Samsung Kernel Source ?

How would/could we as a community bombard Samsung with the J-Bean Source requests?

Where to send the requests exactly?

Or could/should we start a petition, or might there already be one we don't know about?

Yes I know there exists only an un-official J-Bean Leak for our I-727, but where did it come from if not Samsung originally?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] mindmajick:
Sigh.

Patience. Samsung will release the source shortly after jellybean is official. They're very prompt about that.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] whosgotlag:
Except won't that be an official 4.1.2; and we need 4.2.1 - so essentially it's useless?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] mindmajick:
Ack! Good point! Brain fart! I don't think harassing Samsung will help though
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] jeffakajeff:
Whats your status on this build? Did you get it to boot yet? Did you figure out anything with the display drivers?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] onlychevys:
Well, I did a new build for my hercules and dang if it didn't boot! And then I realized that I flashed a rom that was 4.1 but named very close to what I thought I was flashing. I was so freaking happy that I figured out the display problems we have been having! And then I realized that in reality I am a moron! A dev I am not, but I give myself a big dummy award for thinking I got 4.2 to boot. I'm still going to keep trying though!

On a better note I set up a build env. with ubunu 12.10 and things do seem to be better as far as fixing errors compared to 10.04 or 12.04
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] jeffakajeff:
Same spot I am in. Bleh.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Deliberate:
Omg guys! Look at this!!!!

http://xdaforums.com/showthread.php?t=2103831

T989 (Hercules)

They have something some devs may wanna look at!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Smittiegee19:
Sweet looks promising!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] smartguy044:
hey guys i have been looking through the thread and the google doc....i have sucessfully built and am currently running 4.2 for exhibit 4g (soory its the pos im stuck with till i get another s3 :-/) the way we got it booting is we use cm10 boot.img very lil if any ramdisk edits were done. with that said i may be able to build it if you guys wanna test it out. i just need someone to upload the vendor and device folders for the skyrocket and ill be happy to look at it for you guys
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Smittiegee19:
I'll be willing to test. I want the no brick guarantee though ;)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] mtdew:
Then your not willing to test anything as there is no dev in their right mind who would ever give a promise like that. In fact you should never do any modifications to your phone at all as the risk is always there.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] car vs driver:
Quoted again for the hilarity. Well played.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Smittiegee19:
Relax bud. It was said in jest. I am a die hard, and not a fresh off the boat flasher
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] mtdew:
My bad I'm bad at interwebs lol.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] BMP7777:
I don't even think AT$T can provide a guarantee like that. I've seen many an OTA update turn ugly. Not personally, but ......

(the dollar sign was intentional btw)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] whosgotlag:
And the camera works? Impressive
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] bearclaw7380:
Someone needs to get ahold of top right away if he doesn't already know lol
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] vincom:
yup, i tried it , it boots, i made changes to the updaterscript and buildprop, cant seem to fix the rotation though
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] whosgotlag:
Done, I passed it along.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] AndroidGee209:
is there a guide on how to be a tester ? lol , i'd really like to help but i want to know what im suppose to be looking for and all that.

and sorry for such a stupid question.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] softballjunkee13:
If u don't know what to look for on your own.... you're definitely not ready to b a tester.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] spitfire2425:
Holy Santa clause nuts batman! We got boot! :D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] jobankler:
im getting status 7 on the jeffs build on the latest sk8erwitskil cwm
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Deliberate:
could try my fix

http://www.mediafire.com/?76bxbw34bzvj7j2

its for cm10 but hey! u never know...

---------- Post added at 04:14 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:13 PM ----------

agree. but speaking of ill def. be a tester! pm me a link when your ready if u want!!

---------- Post added at 04:16 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:14 PM ----------

really? that usually happens when the updater script is for a different phone. extract zip using 7zip(or something similiar) download notepad++ go to META-INF-com-google-android-updater-script once there open with notepad++ and change the top to SGH-I727 and the name to Skyrocket!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] jobankler:
Thanks man! fix it!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] whosgotlag:
I've been talking to CM on G+ and the status given to me was

"There is no 4.2 for 8660 yet, so 8660 devices are stalled. We have every expectation that it will happen, but currently Qcom is lagging."﻿

Can anyone translate?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] krazeecracker:
Qcom likely is dragging there feet on releasing the proper drivers.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Deliberate:
no prob! :)
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] whosgotlag:
Does the T989 use different processor?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] vincom:
no afaik, but this is what he did to get it to boot on hercs, dirty but worked

tried that, but ill try again
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] AndroidGee209:
well i flashed the rom and its been on the boot animation ever since.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] roger_n:
That means that the device maintainers (topprospect and mikeyman77) have to do all the work of re-branching, patching, for the kernel and any drivers like display, camera, BT, radio etc... not qcom. I've been on IRC pretty much all day with mikeyman77 (Herc) and we both had builds that failed to boot, he is currently working on some kernel patches for both the Skyrocket and Herc. jeffakajeff has done some awesome work getting the Herc to boot but the ROM is still using the old CM10 libs not the 4.2 egl libs. The new stuff is a PITA but the maintainers will eventually get it done we all have to be patient.

Roger:cool:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] whosgotlag:
So basically, it'll happen but not soon. But no one has given up
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] m4570d0n:
Nope. Both use the Snapdragon S3 SoC with the APQ8060/MSM8x60 CPU and Adreno 220 GPU.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snapdragon_(system_on_chip)#Snapdragon_S3
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] roger_n:
It's being worked it just takes longer without source.

Roger
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Locoman_:
Wow, this is good news indeed! I was worrying that the sr was at the end of its development life.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Deliberate:
That's why I started porting. All of our Devs seem to be leaving! Its a shame. I truly love this phone!
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] krazeecracker:
Re: [rom] [kang] cm10.1 wip

delete
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] whosgotlag:
Good input
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] AndroidGee209:
This alpha build is pretty smooth :3 except the bugs it has :(
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] krazeecracker:
team chopsticks has updated there git with new changes for our phones.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] ..Cory..:
I saw! Things are looking gooooood! :p
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] m4570d0n:
He rebased the kernel, but now has to work through all of the conflicts that created to get the kernel to compile (and even then, it still may not boot). The list is in the commit message here:

https://github.com/TeamChopsticks/a...mmit/e798b2c56dbe91b22d99dc56b47b907874ebebb9
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] whosgotlag:
So are we a week or two away
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] Koragg618:
No ETAs as usual but probably under month with our devs' workhorse
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] whosgotlag:
Now THAT was good input =p

Yeah I didn't mean it as an ETA; just confused what all of it meant
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] dakpluto:
It means....still a lot of work to do. TeamChopsticks won't release a patched together hodgepodge just to get a boot.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] mindmajick:
Its why I love TC! :D
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] whosgotlag:
Is anyone confused by how long its taking? Not in any disrespectful way, I was just under the impression that 4.1-4.2 was a very small jump. I know nothing about coding, but beyond the camera and quick panel, isn't nothing else really different?
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] vincom:
i also had that impression, i guess google changed more than anyone thought they would, tooooo much butter, but that being the case the jb name should of changed also, i guess we gotta wait
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] mtdew:
I was under a similar impression but it looks like they overhauled a large number of things again. This naturally presents roadblocks for devs as they have no point of reference and have to jump back to near square one. I would say we should appreciate all the hard work it took to get us 4.1 if 4.2 happens awesome if not, oh well. We know its getting close that's all I need lol.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] roger_n:
CM 10.1 4.2.1 Update

Guys I just got off IRC with topprospect and mikeyman77, the word is Cyanogen has done a little msm8660 kernel work. Bad news the kernel is panicking early in the boot process, good news Topp and Mikey are debugging and trying to fix things. This news is bigger then it appears we now have the right set of eyes on the code for our devices.

EDIT: I did a fresh build with Cyanogen's changes and VERIFIED boot-looping panic. lol

Roger:cool:
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] onlychevys:
Now that is good news! This has been such a major change in everything, I have borked my build environment a few times trying to fix things only to feel as I am going backwards. I don't mind the wait at all, its just super news that the right eyes are on things! If only I could just zap the knowledge these people have into my head lol. I learn super fast, its just the remembering part that gets me. If only I was in my 20's again.
[AT&T Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket SGH-I727] quikt:
Thanks for contacting them roger, i think you or someone else posted sometime ago that our device were next in line, it was gonna take Mr Cyanogen himselfs edits to get us going.

everyone here really needs to just chill out and wait for TC, obviously when cm10.1 is ready we will have builds posted. if you dont see a build posted, its safe to assume its not ready. if you dont see a date or timeline or status update its still safe to assume its not ready. so stop asking .02